Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model"

•

1 gefällt mir•485 views

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Präsentation bei der zweiten Sitzung der Fachgruppe Datenformate am 22. November 2017 in Frankfurt am Main

Eine mögliche Motivation
"Wenn man gesagt hat, dass die
Beatles und Bob Dylan das
musikalische und gesellschaftliche
Bewußtsein einer ganzen Generation
verändert haben, dann ist es für
unseren Zusammenhang wichtig zu
sehen: Diese Bewußtseinsveränderung
basiert auf dem Blues und wäre
unmöglich ohne ihn.
Besonders deutlich sagt dies der
englische Gitarrist Eric Clapton: 'Rock
ist wie eine Batterie. Von Zeit zu Zeit
mußt du zurück zum Blues und dich
neu aufladen.'"
Joachim-Ernst Berendt, Das Jazzbuch,
1993, Seite 225
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20172
Public Domain,
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=829904

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20173
Vorbemerkung: Our View (2004)

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20174
MAB => FRBR: Tabelle ...

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20175
... und
Artikel
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-8938

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20176
Die FRBR-Familie
– Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
1997, amended and corrected through 2008
– Functional Requirements for Authority Data
2008, amended and corrected through 2013
– Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data
2010
– FRBRoo
2010, Version 2.4 2015

Die FRBR Review Group, hier: 2015
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20177
© Anke Verena Meyer-Heß, http://spontan-wild-und-kuchen.de/?p=1864

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20178
https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11412

Table of Contents
1 Introduction
2 Methodology
3 Users and User Tasks
4 Model Definition
4.1 Entities
4.2 Attributes
4.3 Relationships
5 Model Overview
5.1 Entity-Relationship Diagrams
5.2 Constraints between Entities and Alignments
5.3 Modelling of Online Distribution
5.4 Nomens in a Library Context
5.5 Modelling of Bibliographic Identities
5.6 Representative Expression Attributes
5.7 Modelling of Aggregates
5.8 Modelling of Serials
6 Alignment of User Tasks with the Entities, Attributes and
Relationships
7 Glossary of Modelling Terminology
8 Conceptual Models Consulted
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20179

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201710
Entity Hierarchy

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201711
"Pumpkin"?

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201712
W-E-M-I

Responsibility
Relationships
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201713

Overview of Relationships
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201714

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201715
Neu: "res"
http://geek-and-poke.com/geekandpoke/2013/7/22/future-proof-your-data-model

Neu: "nomen"
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201716

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201717
neu:
"agent"

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 2017
General Model for Aggregates
18

Additional explanatory documentation
1. Summary of changes since the world-wide review in 2016
2. Explanations of recurring issues
3. Transition mapping document
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201719

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 2017
Ein Detail: Fiktive Person
Person An individual human being
Scope notes:
The entity person is restricted to real persons who live or are
assumed to have lived.
Strict proof of the existence of a person is not required, as
long as there is a general acceptance of their probable
historicity.
However, figures generally considered fictional (for example,
Kermit the Frog), literary (for example, Miss Jane Marple) or
purely legendary (for example, the wizard Merlin) are not
instances of the entity person.
20

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201721
vgl. GND-Entitätencodierungen
– "pxl" fuer "Literarische Gestalten, Sagengestalten":
> 1.300 Entitäten
– "kxz" fuer "fiktive Körperschaften":
17 Entitäten
– "gxz" fuer "fiktive Orte":
32 Entitäten
– "sxz" fuer fiktive Sachbegriffe:
2 Entitäten

Ausblick 1: IFLA LRM und RDA
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201722

Ausblick 2:
IFLA LRM und
BIBFRAME ?
Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201723

Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201724
Danke
Reinhold Heuvelmann
r.heuvelmann@dnb.de

Empfohlen

They have left the building: The Web Route to Library Users

Richard Wallis

Russian public libraries

Katelyn Coombes

This document summarizes research strategies for a project on Russian public libraries. It outlines steps such as using general databases first before branching out, and considering search terms, dates, and perspectives. Useful databases are listed, and challenges are noted around finding Soviet-era sources and varying viewpoints. Zotero is evaluated as helpful despite some accuracy issues, and careful keyword selection and outlining approaches are recommended.

Locating librarianships Identity in its historical roots of professional phil...

IFLA New Professionals Special Interest Group

"Locating librarianship's Identity in its historical roots of professional philosophies: towards a radical new identity for librarians of today (and tomorrow)" SARA WINGATE GRAY (Department of Information Studies, University College London, London, United Kingdom) Session 95: "Strategies for library associations: include new professionals now!" Management of Library Associations with the New Professionals Special Interest Group 13 August 2012, 09:30 - 12:45, Room: 6 http://conference.ifla.org/ifla78/session-95 WLIC2012 "Libraries Now! - Inspiring, Surprising, Empowering" IFLA World Library and Information Congress 78th IFLA General Conference and Assembly 11-17 August 2012, Helsinki, Finland http://conference.ifla.org/ifla78/

Maja Žumer: Library catalogues of the future: realising the old vision with n...

ÚISK FF UK

The document discusses the future of library catalogs and metadata, noting that catalogs need to change to meet new user needs and expectations by making data more intuitive to explore, exposing relationships between works and other entities, and fully utilizing the quality of library metadata. It also reviews the history and conceptual models for bibliographic data like FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD, which aim to present bibliographic information in a more user-oriented way. Libraries will need new systems built on these conceptual models to improve user tasks like finding, identifying, selecting, and exploring materials.

NASIG Webinar 2014 "From Record-Bound to Boundless: FRBR, Linked Data and New...

Juliya Borie

The use of linked data within the library community has the potential to significantly impact cataloging and may help improve information discovery and retrieval for the end user. For librarians and users alike, serial publications have been a constant challenge due to their complex publication histories and fluid nature. In this webinar, the presenters will reprise their NASIG 2013 Conference presentation, providing an overview of Linked Data developments within the library and journal publishing communities. By exploring serials in relation to FRBR principles and linked data modeling techniques, the presenters will describe how a search for periodical literature might be improved in a linked data environment. Taking description out of the current record constraints, serials librarians will be able to express the relationships between multiple versions of the same publication, and document how a particular journal has changed over time. The linked data model also opens up many opportunities for the provision of value-added content to bibliographic descriptions.

Links and Entities: The Library Data Revolution

OCLC

Building a balanced collection 2003 version

Johan Koren

The document discusses building a balanced library collection to serve student needs. It defines key terms like "collection building" and explores ideas of balance, including balancing print and digital resources, balancing popular and educational materials, and balancing issues with multiple perspectives. The document presents a matrix model for conceptualizing a balanced collection, positioning resources on continua from glocal to grobal and from something to nothing.

BIBFRAME on its way

Reinhold Heuvelmann

The document discusses the development of BIBFRAME, a new bibliographic framework being developed as a replacement for MARC. It provides an overview of BIBFRAME, including its model and vocabulary, participating institutions, applications being developed, and future plans and challenges. Caveats about the transition are noted, such as concerns about the need for yet another new standard and changes to existing workflows. The future of linked library data is also speculated on.

Empfohlen

They have left the building: The Web Route to Library Users

Richard Wallis

Russian public libraries

Katelyn Coombes

Locating librarianships Identity in its historical roots of professional phil...

IFLA New Professionals Special Interest Group

Maja Žumer: Library catalogues of the future: realising the old vision with n...

ÚISK FF UK

NASIG Webinar 2014 "From Record-Bound to Boundless: FRBR, Linked Data and New...

Juliya Borie

Links and Entities: The Library Data Revolution

OCLC

Building a balanced collection 2003 version

Johan Koren

BIBFRAME on its way

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Das_Doppelhaus

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Das Doppelhaus: Werkstattbericht aus der MARC/RDA Working Group Vortrag beim 109. Deutschen Bibliothekartag 2021 Auf der Basis des IFLA Library Reference Model (LRM) wurden im Zuge des 3R-Projekts neue Entitätentypen und neue Elemente in das Regelwerk Resource Description and Access (RDA) eingebracht. Um sie nutzbar zu machen, gilt es, sie im Datenformat MARC 21 abzubilden, soweit es notwendig und zugleich technisch möglich ist. MARC 21 ist auch über 50 Jahre nach seiner Entstehung noch immer das international am weitesten verbreitete bibliografische Datenformat. Das Network Development and MARC Standards Office (NDMSO) der Library of Congress hat im Dezember 2019 die "MARC/RDA Working Group" gebildet, zusammengesetzt aus internationalen Fachleuten für RDA und MARC 21. Für den deutschsprachigen Bereich ist Reinhold Heuvelmann benannt worden. Die Gruppe hat in bisher vier halbjährlichen Zyklen Analysen erstellt zu den neuen Themenbereichen "Manifestation Statements", "Mode of Issuance", "Extension Plan", "Type of Binding" und "Data Provenance", die dann als Diskussionspapiere und Anträge für das MARC Advisory Committee vorbereitet worden sind. Bisher resultieren daraus die neuen Felder 334 "Mode of Issuance", 335 "Extension Plan" und 881 "Manifestation Statements". Auch an dem Thema der "Representative Expression" und ihrer Attribute wird weitergearbeitet. Mit dem vorläufigen Abschluss der Arbeiten ist für das Frühjahr 2022 zu rechnen. Der Vortrag stellt den aktuellen Stand und den Fortgang der Arbeiten dar und versucht auch, die Spannungsfelder bei der Regelwerks- und Formatentwicklung zu beleuchten.

Open Access und Lizenzangaben im MARC-Format

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access, Embargo, Lizenzangaben, Creative Commons, Rights Statements, Rechteinhaber – diese Begriffe bezeichnen ein aktuell intensiv diskutiertes Themenfeld. Kann ich eine Online-Publikation bekommen, sofort, kostenfrei und egal wo ich mich gerade befinde? Und wenn ja: Was kann und darf ich dann damit machen, und was eventuell nicht? Und was sollte ich sonst beachten? Diese Angaben sind bisher in Metadatenformaten unterrepräsentiert. Teils liegen sie an unterschiedlichen Stellen und in unterschiedlicher Form vor, teils sind die Elemente nicht besetzt, teils fehlen die Aussagemöglichkeiten ganz. Hier gilt es Verbesserungen zu erreichen: Ziel ist es, konsistente und maschinell auswertbare Daten zu ermitteln, zu erstellen und transportieren zu können, auf deren Basis den Endnutzenden die Informationen zu Zugang und Nutzung und ihren Bedingungen angeboten werden. Der Vortrag schildert das Vorgehen im Datenformat MARC 21: Von der Ermittlung des Bedarfs und dem Auftrag durch den Standardisierungsausschuss, über die Analysen und Diskussionen in der Themengruppe Lizenzangaben als Untergruppe der Fachgruppe Datenformate und in der DINI Gruppe Lizenzen, bis zur Zusammenarbeit mit OCLC an Diskussionspapieren und einem MARC-Antrag und der internationalen Standardisierung im MARC Advisory Committee, resultierend in der abschließenden Entscheidung. Ein Ausblick auf Empfehlungen und die Anwendung der Formatelemente, deren Einführung bevorsteht, rundet den Vortrag ab.

European BIBFRAME Workshop

Reinhold Heuvelmann

RDA / MARC / BIBFRAME: some observations

Reinhold Heuvelmann

In the days of AACR2 and MARC 21, the distinction between a rules standard and a format standard seemed to be straightforward: The rules standard provided instructions on which pieces of information are relevant, and how to build and provide them. The format standard then accommodated these pieces, creating structured elements in a defined technical framework so that information could be created, stored and communicated. Nowadays, the line between rules standards and format standards seems to be blurred. Based on relatively new models, the standard "Resource Description and Access" not only provides instructions in a toolkit, but adds blocks for handling the information on its own, e.g. as "RDA in RDF" data. On the other hand, "BIBFRAME" was developed, one of the goals being to define a successor to the MARC 21 format. Based on a model with a slightly different approach, it aims to cover different rules standards, among which RDA is the most prominent one. Both RDA and BIBFRAME are based on Linked Data principles, but they have chosen different paths. In my lightning talk I share some observations, from a German perspective, collected over some years of active participation in MARC 21 standardization and BIBFRAME experimentation, as a bystander of the FRBR and RDA development, and still as a newbie in Linked Data. There are more questions than answers.

From enthusiasm to hesitation,and beyond: some German remarks on BIBFRAME

Reinhold Heuvelmann

The document discusses the German National Library's views on BIBFRAME. It notes initial enthusiasm that has given way to some hesitation as open questions remain. These include whether BIBFRAME will run parallel to MARC, its relationship to standards like RDA, and how implementation and vendor participation will work. The document also provides examples of bibliographic data represented in different formats including MARC, Linked Data, and BIBFRAME.

Diakritika in Unicode

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access und Lizenzangaben in MARC 21 - Update

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access and License Representation in MARC 21

Reinhold Heuvelmann

The document discusses several MARC 21 fields that could potentially be used to represent open access and license information: Field 506 (Restrictions on Access Note), Field 540 (Terms Governing Use and Reproduction Note), Field 510 (Citation/References Note), Field 856 (Electronic Location and Access), and Field 912 (Designation of National Licenses and Digital Collections). It provides details on the definition, indicators, subfields, and usage of each field. It concludes by posing questions about which fields are currently used in practice for licensing, which fields are preferred, and whether any fields require changes to better represent licensing information.

Open Access und Lizenzangaben in MARC 21

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Overview of Format Activities in Die Deutsche Bibliothek

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Provenance in MARC 21

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Linked Data at the German National Library

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Entitäten, Relationen und mehr - Erweiterungen in MARC 21 Authority durch di...

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Some requirements for a future metadata format

Reinhold Heuvelmann

BIBFRAME

Reinhold Heuvelmann

BIBFRAME: Neues bibliografisches Datenformat, und noch viel mehr Vortrag im Rahmen des Berliner Bibliothekswissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums, Institut für Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, am 2. Februar 2016 Die Bibliographic Framework Initiative "BIBFRAME" ist bereits einige Jahre "alt". Nach Planungen im Jahr 2011, nach Vertragsabschluss zwischen der LoC und der Firma Zepheira sowie Veröffentlichung des ersten Modellpapiers "Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data" in 2012 folgten ein arbeitsintensives Jahr 2013, das unter Beteiligung der DNB von den Aktivitäten der Early Experimenters Group geprägt war, ein konsolidierendes Jahr 2014, in dem das bestehende Vokabular auf Praxistauglichkeit hin geprüft wurde, und ein Jahr 2015, in dem BIBFRAME mit unterschiedlichen Ansätzen (LC Pilot, Libhub.org, LD4L/LD4P) weiter vorangetrieben wurde. In meinem Vortrag gehe ich der Frage nach, welchen Stellenwert die BIBFRAME-Initiative im Umfeld der Linked Library Data einnimmt. Wie verhalten sich BIBFRAME und andere existierende und neu entstehende Vokabularien zueinander? Sind RDA und BIBFRAME als Seiten derselben Medaille zu sehen? Welche Bezüge gibt es zu schema.org und den bibliothekarischen Erweiterungen dieses Vokabulars? Welche Rolle spielen in Zukunft noch die klassischen Datenformate, wie MARC 21 und seine Derivate? Was macht den Framework-Charakter der Initiative aus? Und: Welchen Beitrag kann die deutschsprachige Community bei der Diskussion und Entwicklung dieser Fragen weiterhin leisten? https://www.ibi.hu-berlin.de/de/bbk https://www.ibi.hu-berlin.de/de/bbk/abstracts/ws1516/heuvelmann

GND and URIs: Integration and Identification

Reinhold Heuvelmann

BIBFRAME

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Warum ausgerechnet BIBFRAME?

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Die Bibliographic Framework Initiative "BIBFRAME" blickt jetzt auf drei Jahre zurück. Nach dem Abschluss des Vertrags zwischen der Library of Congress und der Firma Zepheira im Mai 2012 und nach der Veröffentlichung des ersten maßgeblichen Modellpapiers "Bibliographic Framework as a Web of Data: Linked Data Model and Supporting Services" im November 2012 folgten ein arbeitsintensives Jahr 2013, das unter Beteiligung der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek von den Aktivitäten der Early Experimenters / Early Implementers Group geprägt war, und ein konsolidierendes Jahr 2014, in dem das bestehende Vokabular auf Praxistauglichkeit hin geprüft wurde und ergänzende Initiativen, wie der "BIBFRAME Editor" und libhub.org, aufgesetzt wurden. Nun ist es Zeit zu fragen, was erreicht wurde und wie es weiter geht. In dem Vortrag soll beleuchtet werden, welchen Stellenwert die BIBFRAME-Initiative im Umfeld der Linked Library Data einnimmt, bisher, und besonders in den kommenden Jahren. Dabei soll die Frage untersucht werden, wie wichtig die Offenheit ist, die durch den Framework-Aspekt betont wird, im Gegensatz zu dem eher starren Standard bisheriger Prägung. Wie verhalten sich BIBFRAME und andere existierende und neu entstehende Vokabularien zueinander? Sind RDA und BIBFRAME als die beiden Seiten derselben Medaille zu sehen? Was hat es mit schema.org und den bibliothekarischen Erweiterungen dieses Vokabulars auf sich? Welche Rolle spielen in Zukunft noch die klassischen Datenformate, wie MARC 21 und seine Derivate? Und ganz wichtig: Welchen Beitrag kann die deutschsprachige Community bei der Diskussion und Entwicklung dieser Fragen weiterhin leisten?

BIBFRAME: Wie geht es weiter?

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Seit drei Jahren zieht die Bibliographic Framework Initiative "BIBFRAME" Aufmerksamkeit und Hoffnungen auf sich. Wie hat sich das Rahmenkonzept für künftige bibliografische Metadatenformate bisher entwickelt? Welche Aktivitäten gibt es bei den einstigen Early Experimenters, und darüber hinaus? Welche Ausprägungen gibt es? Wie gut passen RDA-Daten aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum zu BIBFRAME? Und wie verhalten sich BIBFRAME und andere existierende und neu entstehende Vokabularien zueinander?

2015 02-24 dnb-linking_data

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Choosing The Best AWS Service For Your Website + API.pptx

Brandon Minnick, MBA

Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API? Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose? Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs? Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!

Serial Arm Control in Real Time Presentation

tolgahangng

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von Reinhold Heuvelmann

Das_Doppelhaus

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access und Lizenzangaben im MARC-Format

Reinhold Heuvelmann

European BIBFRAME Workshop

Reinhold Heuvelmann

RDA / MARC / BIBFRAME: some observations

Reinhold Heuvelmann

From enthusiasm to hesitation,and beyond: some German remarks on BIBFRAME

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Diakritika in Unicode

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access und Lizenzangaben in MARC 21 - Update

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access and License Representation in MARC 21

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Open Access und Lizenzangaben in MARC 21

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Overview of Format Activities in Die Deutsche Bibliothek

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Provenance in MARC 21

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Linked Data at the German National Library

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Entitäten, Relationen und mehr - Erweiterungen in MARC 21 Authority durch di...

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Some requirements for a future metadata format

Reinhold Heuvelmann

BIBFRAME

Reinhold Heuvelmann

GND and URIs: Integration and Identification

Reinhold Heuvelmann

BIBFRAME

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Warum ausgerechnet BIBFRAME?

Reinhold Heuvelmann

BIBFRAME: Wie geht es weiter?

Reinhold Heuvelmann

2015 02-24 dnb-linking_data

Reinhold Heuvelmann

Mehr von Reinhold Heuvelmann (20)

Das_Doppelhaus

Open Access und Lizenzangaben im MARC-Format

European BIBFRAME Workshop

RDA / MARC / BIBFRAME: some observations

From enthusiasm to hesitation,and beyond: some German remarks on BIBFRAME

Diakritika in Unicode

Open Access und Lizenzangaben in MARC 21 - Update

Open Access and License Representation in MARC 21

Open Access und Lizenzangaben in MARC 21

Overview of Format Activities in Die Deutsche Bibliothek

Provenance in MARC 21

Linked Data at the German National Library

Entitäten, Relationen und mehr - Erweiterungen in MARC 21 Authority durch di...

Some requirements for a future metadata format

BIBFRAME

GND and URIs: Integration and Identification

BIBFRAME

Warum ausgerechnet BIBFRAME?

BIBFRAME: Wie geht es weiter?

2015 02-24 dnb-linking_data

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Choosing The Best AWS Service For Your Website + API.pptx

Brandon Minnick, MBA

Serial Arm Control in Real Time Presentation

tolgahangng

Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack

shyamraj55

Overcoming the PLG Trap: Lessons from Canva's Head of Sales & Head of EMEA Da...

saastr

Skybuffer AI: Advanced Conversational and Generative AI Solution on SAP Busin...

Tatiana Kojar

Skybuffer AI, built on the robust SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP), is the latest and most advanced version of our AI development, reaffirming our commitment to delivering top-tier AI solutions. Skybuffer AI harnesses all the innovative capabilities of the SAP BTP in the AI domain, from Conversational AI to cutting-edge Generative AI and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). It also helps SAP customers safeguard their investments into SAP Conversational AI and ensure a seamless, one-click transition to SAP Business AI. With Skybuffer AI, various AI models can be integrated into a single communication channel such as Microsoft Teams. This integration empowers business users with insights drawn from SAP backend systems, enterprise documents, and the expansive knowledge of Generative AI. And the best part of it is that it is all managed through our intuitive no-code Action Server interface, requiring no extensive coding knowledge and making the advanced AI accessible to more users.

System Design Case Study: Building a Scalable E-Commerce Platform - Hiike

Hiike

Letter and Document Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Sol...

Jeffrey Haguewood

Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows. We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases. This video focuses on automated letter generation for Bonterra Impact Management using Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. Interested in deploying letter generation automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.

GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations

kumardaparthi1024

June Patch Tuesday

Ivanti

Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.

Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus

Zilliz

During this demo, the founders of Secludy will demonstrate how their system utilizes Milvus to store and manipulate embeddings for generating privacy-protected synthetic data. Their approach not only maintains the confidentiality of the original data but also enhances the utility and scalability of LLMs under privacy constraints. Attendees, including machine learning engineers, data scientists, and data managers, will witness first-hand how Secludy's integration with Milvus empowers organizations to harness the power of LLMs securely and efficiently.

Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024

Hiroshi SHIBATA

I develop the Ruby programming language, RubyGems, and Bundler, which are package managers for Ruby. Today, I will introduce how to enhance the security of your application using open-source software (OSS) examples from Ruby and RubyGems. The first topic is CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures). I have published CVEs many times. But what exactly is a CVE? I'll provide a basic understanding of CVEs and explain how to detect and handle vulnerabilities in OSS. Next, let's discuss package managers. Package managers play a critical role in the OSS ecosystem. I'll explain how to manage library dependencies in your application. I'll share insights into how the Ruby and RubyGems core team works to keep our ecosystem safe. By the end of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to safeguard your code.

Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and Milvus

Zilliz

leewayhertz.com-AI in predictive maintenance Use cases technologies benefits ...

alexjohnson7307

Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment

Octavian Nadolu

In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject. We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup. Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved. The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring. The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise. By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.

Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf

Malak Abu Hammad

Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers: * What is Vector Search? * Importance and benefits of vector search * Practical use cases across various industries * Step-by-step implementation guide * Live demos with code snippets * Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search * Best practices and optimization strategies Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications. #MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology

Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERP

Pixlogix Infotech

UI5 Controls simplified - UI5con2024 presentation

Wouter Lemaire

Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story

Safe Software

Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency. During the hour, we’ll take you through: Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board. Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes. Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI. We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI. This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!

Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers

akankshawande

TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey

TrustArc

How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024? In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores. See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe. This webinar will review: - The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey - The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024 - Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Choosing The Best AWS Service For Your Website + API.pptx

Serial Arm Control in Real Time Presentation

Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack

Overcoming the PLG Trap: Lessons from Canva's Head of Sales & Head of EMEA Da...

Skybuffer AI: Advanced Conversational and Generative AI Solution on SAP Busin...

System Design Case Study: Building a Scalable E-Commerce Platform - Hiike

Letter and Document Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Sol...

GenAI Pilot Implementation in the organizations

June Patch Tuesday

Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus

Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024

Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and Milvus

leewayhertz.com-AI in predictive maintenance Use cases technologies benefits ...

Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment

Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf

Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERP

UI5 Controls simplified - UI5con2024 presentation

Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story

Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers

TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy Survey

Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model"

1. 1 Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" Reinhold Heuvelmann

2. Eine mögliche Motivation "Wenn man gesagt hat, dass die Beatles und Bob Dylan das musikalische und gesellschaftliche Bewußtsein einer ganzen Generation verändert haben, dann ist es für unseren Zusammenhang wichtig zu sehen: Diese Bewußtseinsveränderung basiert auf dem Blues und wäre unmöglich ohne ihn. Besonders deutlich sagt dies der englische Gitarrist Eric Clapton: 'Rock ist wie eine Batterie. Von Zeit zu Zeit mußt du zurück zum Blues und dich neu aufladen.'" Joachim-Ernst Berendt, Das Jazzbuch, 1993, Seite 225 Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20172 Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=829904

3. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20173 Vorbemerkung: Our View (2004)

4. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20174 MAB => FRBR: Tabelle ...

5. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20175 ... und Artikel http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0297-zib-8938

6. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20176 Die FRBR-Familie – Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records 1997, amended and corrected through 2008 – Functional Requirements for Authority Data 2008, amended and corrected through 2013 – Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data 2010 – FRBRoo 2010, Version 2.4 2015

7. Die FRBR Review Group, hier: 2015 Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20177 © Anke Verena Meyer-Heß, http://spontan-wild-und-kuchen.de/?p=1864

8. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20178 https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11412

9. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Methodology 3 Users and User Tasks 4 Model Definition 4.1 Entities 4.2 Attributes 4.3 Relationships 5 Model Overview 5.1 Entity-Relationship Diagrams 5.2 Constraints between Entities and Alignments 5.3 Modelling of Online Distribution 5.4 Nomens in a Library Context 5.5 Modelling of Bibliographic Identities 5.6 Representative Expression Attributes 5.7 Modelling of Aggregates 5.8 Modelling of Serials 6 Alignment of User Tasks with the Entities, Attributes and Relationships 7 Glossary of Modelling Terminology 8 Conceptual Models Consulted Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 20179

10. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201710 Entity Hierarchy

11. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201711 "Pumpkin"?

12. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201712 W-E-M-I

13. Responsibility Relationships Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201713

14. Overview of Relationships Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201714

15. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201715 Neu: "res" http://geek-and-poke.com/geekandpoke/2013/7/22/future-proof-your-data-model

16. Neu: "nomen" Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201716

17. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201717 neu: "agent"

18. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 2017 General Model for Aggregates 18

19. Additional explanatory documentation 1. Summary of changes since the world-wide review in 2016 2. Explanations of recurring issues 3. Transition mapping document Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201719

20. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 2017 Ein Detail: Fiktive Person Person An individual human being Scope notes: The entity person is restricted to real persons who live or are assumed to have lived. Strict proof of the existence of a person is not required, as long as there is a general acceptance of their probable historicity. However, figures generally considered fictional (for example, Kermit the Frog), literary (for example, Miss Jane Marple) or purely legendary (for example, the wizard Merlin) are not instances of the entity person. 20

21. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201721 vgl. GND-Entitätencodierungen – "pxl" fuer "Literarische Gestalten, Sagengestalten": > 1.300 Entitäten – "kxz" fuer "fiktive Körperschaften": 17 Entitäten – "gxz" fuer "fiktive Orte": 32 Entitäten – "sxz" fuer fiktive Sachbegriffe: 2 Entitäten

22. Ausblick 1: IFLA LRM und RDA Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201722

23. Ausblick 2: IFLA LRM und BIBFRAME ? Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201723

24. Reinhold Heuvelmann | Zum "IFLA Library Reference Model" | 22. November 201724 Danke Reinhold Heuvelmann r.heuvelmann@dnb.de