Objectives: This study is to identify the effect of parameter such as Activator ratio thataffects the properties of alkali activated fly ash
Methodology: To achieve the above objectives, the present investigation is adopted atechnology that is currently in use to manufacture and to test themain aim of this activity was to facilitate promotion of newmaterials later on to the concreteindustry. Research variable included activator ratio (1:2, 1:2.5, and 1:3). The trial mix isprepared for the molarity of 16 M. Concrete specimens were cured at roresponse variables are Flexural strength, Compressive strength and Split tensile strength.Findings: Test data are used to identify the variation ofGeopolymer concrete propertieswhich are affected by using of various activator ratios and curing period. At all ages, theactivator ratio 1:3 gives maximum strength and also economical when compared to otheractivator ratios. There is substantial gain incompressive strength of fly ash geopolymerconcrete with age.Improvements:Thisworkcan beenhancedforvariousmolaritiesundervarioustemperaturesandvariousactivator ratios.
2. Ch. Eka Sai Kumar and V. Raju
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 724 editor@iaeme.com
problems. When it is burned, the obtained material is known as RHA. RHA contains SiO2of nearly 80-
90% responsible for having pozzolonic properties.
In this experimental work rice husk ash replaces cement partially at different proportions such as
0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25%. Tests are conducted on hardened concrete.
2. OBJECTIVES
The primary objectives of the study are
• the practicability of utilizing the Rice Husk Ash in concrete production as partial replacement of cement
• to determine the amount of RHA that can be partially replaced with cement.
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1. MATERIALS
• Cement: Ordinary Portland cement of grade 53 confirmed to requirements of IS: 1229-1987 with
specific gravity of 3.15.
• Fine aggregate: Locally available river sand satisfying requirement of IS: 383-1980. Specific gravity is
2.58
• Coarse aggregate: Crushed angular aggregate of nominal size 20mm.specific gravity is 2.80
• Water: Water confirming to IS 456-2009
• Rice husk ash: Collected from Guntur rice mill. It is burned under controlled temperature and sieved
by 150 micron sieve. Specific gravity is 2.05.
3.2 Mix design
Mix design is done as per IS:10262. The mix proportion taken is 1:1:2 with water cement ratio of 0.42
3.3 Casting
A total of 108 specimens are casted where 36 specimens are cubes, 36 specimens are beams and 36
specimens are cylinders and left for 24 hours respectively.
3.4 Curing
After 24 hours of casting concrete mix samples are removed from moulds and cured for 7and 28 days.
3.5 Testing
The strength tests i.e., compression test, split tensile test, flexural test conducted for 7days and 28 days
as per Indian Standards.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
As per IS standards tests are conducted such as compression test, split tensile test and flexural test.
After conducting tests the average of three samples are noted in tables and plotted in graphs for
percentages of 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% which are as shown in graphs (figure1, 2, 3) below
for 7 days and 28 days
3. A Study on Replacement of Cement with Rice Husk Ash
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 725 editor@iaeme.com
Table 1 Chemical composition of RHA
Component % of composition
SiO2 86.91
Al2O3 0.5
Fe2O3 0.87
CaO 1.04
MgO 0.85
Na2O 0.69
K2O 3.16
Table 2 Compressive strength in N/mm2
0% 5%, 10% 15%, 20% 25%,
7 days 19.78 21.97 24.89 17.82 15.75 8.26
28 days 31.75 35.78 32.78 24.48 22.15 14.46
Table 3 Split tensile strength in N/mm2
0% 5%, 10% 15%, 20% 25%,
7 days 1.40 1.97 2.39 1.03 0.7 0.36
28 days 2.34 2.96 3.38 1.59 1.26 0.81
Table 4 Flexural strength in N/mm2
0% 5%, 10% 15%, 20% 25%,
7 days 2.3 2.95 2.45 2.07 1.15 1.04
28 days 3 4.25 3.75 3.37 2.25 2.05
4. Ch. Eka Sai Kumar and V. Raju
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 726 editor@iaeme.com
Figure 1 Compressive strength for 7 and 28 days
Figure 2 Split tensile strength for 7 and 28 days
Figure 3 Flexural strength for 7 and 28 days
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
FlexuralstrengthinN/mm2
% of cement replaced with RHA
7 days
28 days
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
compresivestrength(N/mm2)
% of cement repaced with RHA
7 days
28 days
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
splittensiletensilestrength(N/mm2)
% of cement replaced with RHA
7 days
28 days
5. A Study on Replacement of Cement with Rice Husk Ash
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 727 editor@iaeme.com
5. CONCLUSIONS
Following are the outcomes drawn from the above study:
• Cement can be replaced with RHA up to range of 0-15%.
• It is clearly shown that RHA has the prospective to be used as partial replacement material for cement
as it has pozzolanic properties
• The problem of disposal of RHA is reduced.
• The greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced up to a major extent by replacing OPC with RHA in
concrete
REFERENCES
[1] Basha, Emhammed A., and Agus S. Muntohar. “Effect of the cement-rice husk ash on the plasticity
and compaction of soil,” Electronic Journal of Geotechnical engineering 8(2003).
[2] Bakar, B.H.A., Putrajaya, R.C. and Abdulaziz H. (2010). Malaysian Saw dust ash – Improving the
Durability and Corrosion resistance of concrete: Pre-review. Concrete Research Letters, 1(1): 6-13,
March 2010.
[3] Bui, D.D.; Hu, J. and Stroeven, P. (2005). Particle Size Effect on the Strength of Rice Husk Ash
Blended Gap-Graded Portland Cement Concrete, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 27, pp
357-366.
[4] De Sensale, G.R. (2006). Strength development of concrete with rice-ash. Cement & Concrete
Composites, 28; 158-160.
[5] Ganeshan, K., Rasagopal, K., Thangavel, K., Sarawathi. V. And Selvaraj, R. “Rice Husk Ash”,
Journal, Indian Cement Review, May-04
[6] Gemma Rodriguez de Sensale, “Strength development of concrete with rice-husk ash”, Cement &
Concrete Composite, Vol. 28, 2006,158-160
[7] Habeeb, G.A. and Fayyadh, M.M. (2009). Saw dust ash Concrete: The Effect of SDA Average
Particle Size Mechanical Properties and Drying Shrinkage. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied
Sciences, 3(3):1616-1622.
[8] Kartini, K. (2011). Rice Husk Ash- Pozzolanic Material for Sustainability. International Journal of
Applied Science and Technology. Vol. 1, No 6.
[9] Lee,S.T., Moon,H.Y. and Swamy,R.N.(2005), Sulphate Attack and Role of Silica Fume in
Resisting Strength Loss;Cementan Concrete Composites,Vol 27;pp:65-76.
[10] Malhotra, V.M. and Mehta, P.K. (2004). Pozzolanic and Cementitious Materials. London: Taylor &
Francis
[11] Michael, R. (2009). Discovery new rice concrete cement - greenhouse emissions.
[12] Shafiq, N., Austriaco, L.R. and Nimityongskul, P. (1988). Durability of natural fibers in RHA
mortar. Journal of Ferrocement, Volume 18, No. 3, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand. 249-
262.
[13] Abdullah Anwar, Sabih Ahmad, Yusuf Jamal and M.Z. Khan, Assessment of Liquefaction Potential
of Soil Using Multi-Linear Regression Modeling, International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology, 7(1), 2016, pp. 373-415.
[14] Akpila, S. B. and Omunguye, I. W. Derivative of Stress Strain, Deviatoric Stress and Undrained
Cohesion Models Based on Soil Modulus of Cohesive Soils. International Journal of Civil
Engineering and Technology, 6(7), 2015, pp 34-43.
[15] John Paul V. and Antony Rachel Sneha M., Effect of Random Inclusion of Bamboo Fibers on
Strength Behaviour of Flyash Treated Black Cotton Soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering
and Technology, 7(5), 2016, pp.153–160.