GCE Kannur

1. COCONUT SHELL
AGGREGATE CONCRETE
GCE Kannur
MAIN PROJECT
PROJECT ID: 2K6CEPJT01
1

2. 2GCE Kannur
 AJEESHA V I
 APARNA P
 ARUN RAJ K
 SAHANA M P
 SHAHSOORA K
 SHAMJITH K M
MEMBERS:

3. OUTLINE
 INTRODUCTION
 MINI PROJECT OVERVIEW
 TEST CONDITIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
 TEST RESULTS
 ANALYSIS
 CONCLUSION
3

4. 4GCE Kannur
25.48
29.84
21
3.98
19.7
Philippines
Indonesia
India
Srilanka
Others
Coconut Production in the World- Country wise
(Values in percentage)
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
INTRODUCTION - WORLD

5. 5GCE Kannur
45%
29%
12%
6%
8%
KER
TN
KAR
AP
Others
Coconut Production in INDIA - State wise
(Values in Percentage)
Source: Coconut Development Board, Kerala
INTRODUCTION - INDIA

6. 6
• Solid waste management issues;
• Utilization of Coconut Shell (CS) in cost effective
construction;
• Sustainable development – preservation & economy;
• Light weight structures;
GCE Kannur
INTRODUCTION

7. GCE Kannur 7
Cement OPC 53 grade
River sand
Coconut shell aggregate
8mm to 16mm size
(From local homes, hostels,..)
Crushed granite stone
20 mm
Potable drinking water
MATERIALS

8. GCE Kannur 8
METHEDOLOGY ADOPTED
Determination of engineering
properties of CS
Determination of properties of
conventional aggregates
Casting M20 mix concrete
Testing, Analysis & Results
Documentation
Conclusion

9. GCE Kannur 9
To evaluate the engineering properties of
coconut shell aggregate.
To compare the properties of coconut shell
aggregate with conventional aggregate.
MINI PROJECT OVERVIEW

10. GCE Kannur 10
PROPERTIES TESTED
Specific gravity
Void ratio
Bulk density
Porosity
Aggregate impact value
Aggregate crushing value
Abrasion value
Fineness modulus

11. GCE Kannur 11
Tests
Convention
al aggregate
Coconut
shell aggregate
Sand
Max size 20 16 4.75
Specific gravity 2.82 1.29 1.1
Bulk density(kg/l) 1.51 0.681
Void ratio 0.866 0.894
Porosity (%) 46.4 47.2
Aggregate abrasion value 27 4.66 -
Impact value of aggregate (%) 21.114 5.51 -
Aggregate crushing value (%) 2.6 5.28 -
Fineness modulus 0.915 1.415 2.83
PROPERTIES AT A GLANCE

12. 12
COCONUT SHELL AGGREGATE
CONCRETE
To find the optimum replacement
of coconut shell

13. GCE Kannur 13
MIX DESIGN
Mass of cement (in kg/m3) 383
Mass of water (in kg/m3) 191.6
Mass of fine aggregate (in kg/m3) 626.36
Mass of coarse aggregate (in kg/m3) 1200.8
Mix ratio 1: 1.635: 3.135

14. GCE Kannur 14
CURING
Temperatures : 27°C ±7°C
W/C Ratio : 0.5

15. Experimental procedure
 Compressive strength
 Split tensile strength
 Flexural strength
15

16. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Factors affecting,
16
Ultimate strength = P/A
Water cement ratio
Aggregate cement ratio
Aggregate grade and maximum
size of aggregate
Compaction
Curing
Age of concrete

17. FLEXURAL STRENGTH
Modulus of rupture, fct =
PL
bd2 ……………… (1)
fct =
3Pa
b
……………… (2)
17
If a > 200, eqn 1
If 170 < a < 200, eqn 2

18. SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH
Circular disc subjected to compression load
diametrically
F =
2P
𝜋DL
Where,
L = Length of cylinder
D = Diameter of cylinder
P = Maximum load
18

19. 19

20. TEST RESULTS
0% Replacement
Cement content : 383 kg/m3
Water cement ratio : 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean
(N/mm2)
1 2 Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive
strength
18.03 17.99 18.01 26.2 26.6 26.4
Split tensile
strength
1.424 1.44 1.432
2.85 2.79 2.82
Flexural strength 2.02 2.08 2.05
3.25 3.09 3.17
20

21. 5% Replacement
Cement content : 384.17 kg/m3
Water cement ratio : 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean
(N/mm2)
1 2 Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive
strength
17.82 17.99 17.90 24.06 24.18 24.12
Split tensile
strength
1.12 0.98 1.050 2.64 2.256 2.448
Flexural strength 2.17 1.79 1.981 2.015 2.551 2.283
21

22. 10% replacement
Trial no:1
Cement content : 385.76 kg/m3
Water cement ratio : 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean
(N/mm2)
1 2 Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive
strength
16.85 16.75 16.80 24.45 17.09 20.77
Split tensile
strength
1.220 1.210 1.215 1.84 2.04 1.94
Flexural
strength
1.843 1.621 1.732 2.78 2.29 2.535
22

23. 10% replacement
Trial no: 2
Cement content: 386.55kg/m3
Water cement ratio: 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2
Mean
(N/mm2) 1 2
Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive
strength 17.55 16.21 16.89 23.81 24.21 24.02
Split tensile
strength 1.3 1.260 1.28 2.47 2.61 2.54
23

24. 15% replacement
Cement content: 387.34kg/m3
Water cement ratio: 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2
Mean
(N/mm2) 1 2
Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive
strength
17.9 17.5 17.7 24.87 24.35 24.61
Split tensile
strength
1.38 1.27 1.32 2.61 2.53 2.57
Flexural
strength
1.984 1.69 1.837 2.99 2.79 2.89
24

25. 20%replacement
Trial no:1
Cement content: 388.13kg/m3
Water cement ratio: 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2
Mean
(N/mm2) 1 2
Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive
strength
12.48 13.33 12.9 20.32 20.49 20.41
Split tensile
strength
1.23 1.1 1.16 1.87 2.09 1.98
Flexural
strength
1.95 1.69 1.820 2.78 2.42 2.60
25

26. Trial no:2
Cement content: 388.92kg/m3
Water cement ratio: 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean 1 2 Mean
Compressive
strength
14.81 14.20 14.78 21.76 19.9 20.83
Trial no:3
Cement content: 389.71kg/m3
Water cement ratio: 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean 1 2 Mean
Compressive
strength
15.7 14.3 15 20.89 22.89 21.89
26

27. 25%replacement
Cement content: 390.50kg/m3
Water cement ratio: 0.5
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean 1 2 Mean
Compressive
strength
12.03 11.87 11.95 21.18 20.54 20.86
Split tensile strength 0.89 1.14 1.015 2.42 2.48 2.45
Flexural strength 1.57 1.69 1.63
27

28. Trial 2
Cement content=391.29kg/m3
Properties
7 days 28 days
1 2 Mean 1 2 Mean
Compressive
strength
11.89 12.13 12.01 21.2 21.26 21.23
30% Replacement
Cement content: 392.08kg/m3
w/c Ratio:0.5
Properties
7 days
1 2 Mean
Compressive strength 10.89 11.58 11.23
Split tensile strength 0.86 1.08 0.97
28

29. 35% Replacement
Cement content:392.08
W/C ratio:0.5
Properties
7 days
1 2
Mean
(N/mm2)
Compressive strength 10.67 11.45 11.06
Split tensile strength 0.59 0.74 0.66
29

30. ANALYSIS
Compressive strength
0%
Replacement
Cement
addition rate
(kg/m3)
7 day strength (N/mm2)
Extra
cement (g)1 2 Mean
0 383.00 18.03 17.99 18.01 0
5 384.17 17.82 17.99 17.90 150
10 385.76 16.85 16.75 16.80 200
10 386.55 17.55 16.21 16.89 250
15 387.34 17.90 17.50 17.70 300
20 388.13 12.48 13.33 12.90 350
20 388.92 14.87 14.20 14.78 400
20 389.71 15.7 14.3 15.0 450
25 390.50 12.03 11.87 11.95 450
25 391.29 12.57 13.01 12.79 500
30 392.08 10.89 11.58 11.23 550
35 392.87 10.67 11.45 11.06 600
30

31. %
replacement
Cement
addition rate
(kg/m3)
3 days strength
(N/mm2)
7 days strength
(N/mm2)
1 2 Mean 1 2 Mean
0 - 0.81 0.83 0.820 1.424 1.44 1.432
5 384.17 kg/m3 0.726 0.746 0.736 1.120 0.98 1.050
10 385.76 kg/m3 0.700 0.740 0.720 1.220 1.210 1.210
10 386.55 kg/m3 0.760 0.760 0.760 1.300 1.260 1.280
15 387.34 kg/m3 1.380 1.270 1.32
20 388.13 kg/m3 1.23 1.10 1.16
20 388.92 kg/m3 1.37 0.96 1.165
25 390.50 kg/m3 0.89 1.14 1.015
30 391.29 kg/m3 0.86 1.08 0.97
35 392.08 kg/m3 0.59 0.74 0.66
Split tensile strength
31

32. %
replacement
Cement
addition rate
(kg/m3)
7 days strength
(N/mm2)
28 days strength
(N/mm2)
1 2 Mean 1 2 Mean
0 - 2.02 2.08 2.05 3.25 3.09 3.17
5 384.17 kg/m3 2.17 1.79 1.981 2.015 2.551 2.283
10 385.76 kg/m3 1.843 1.621 1.732 2.78 2.29 2.535
15 387.34 kg/m3 1.984 1.69 1.837 2.99 2.79 2.89
20 388.13 kg/m3 1.95 1.69 1.82 2.78 2.42 2.60
Flexural strength
32

33. Fig 6.1 Seven days compressive strength (N/mm2)
33
Compressivestrength(N/mm2)

34. Fig 6.2 Seven days split tensile strength (N/mm2)
34
Compressivestrength(N/mm2)

35. Fig 6.3 seven days flexural strength
35
Compressivestrength(N/mm2)

36. Fig 6.4 : 28 days compressive strength
36
Compressivestrength(N/mm2)

37. Fig 6.5 : 28 days split tensile strength
37
Compressivestrength(N/mm2)

38. Fig 6.6 : 28 days flexural strength
38
Compressivestrength(N/mm2)

41. GCE Kannur 41
The optimum replacement is obtained as 15%
CONCLUSION
Can be used as coarse aggregate in the
production of lightweight concrete

42. GCE Kannur 42
1. E. A. Olanipekun, K. O. Olusola ,and O. Atia, “Comparative study between palm
kernel shell and coconut shell as coarse aggregate”, Journal of Engineering and
Applied Science, Asian Research Publishing Network. Japan, 2005.
2. U. O. Kabiru, and A. Saleh, “Exploratory study of coconut shell as coarse
aggregate in concrete”, Journal of engineering and applied sciences, Vol. 2,
December 2010.
3. K. Gunasekaran, and P. S. Kumar, “Lightweight Concrete using Coconut Shells as
Aggregate”, Proceedings, International Conference on "Innovations in Building
Materials, Structural Designs and Construction Practices (IBMSDCP-2008), 15-17
May 2008, pp.375-382.
4. K. Gunasekaran, “Utilization of Coconut Shell as Coarse Aggregate in the
Development of Lightweight Concrete”, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil
Engineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, 2011.
5. C. B. Gopal, and K. B. Ranjan, “Effect of Coconut Shell Aggregate on Normal
Strength Concrete”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology,
Vol. 2 Issue 6, June – 2013, pp: 2405 -2415.
6. Y. Amarnath, and C. Ramachandrudu, “Properties of Concrete with Coconut Shells
as Aggregate Replacement”, International Journal of Engineering Inventions,
Volume 1, Issue 6 (October 2012), pp: 21-31.
7. U. Johnson Alengaram, Baig Abdullah Al Muhit, and Mohd Zamin bin Jumaat,
“Utilization of oil palm kernel shell as lightweight aggregate in concrete”,
Construction and Building Materials, Volume 38, January 2013, Pages 161-172.
REFERENCES

43. GCE Kannur 43