SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 69
Social Psychology
Elliot Aronson
University of California, Santa Cruz
Timothy D. Wilson
University of Virginia
Robin M. Akert
Wellesley College
slides by Travis Langley
Henderson State University
6th edition
Chapter 7
Attitudes and
Attitude Changes:
Influencing Thoughts
and Feelings
“By persuading others,
we convince ourselves.”
— Junius
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF
ATTITUDES
Advertising can have powerful effects.
• Until the early twentieth century, men bought
99% of cigarettes sold. Then advertisers began
targeting female buyers.
• In 1955, there were twice as many male as
female smokers in the United States.
• Although the smoking rate has decreased
overall, women have almost caught up to men.
In 2004 23% of adult men smoked, compared
to 19% of adult women.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF
ATTITUDES
• Although the smoking rate has decreased
overall, women have almost caught up to men.
In 2004 23% of adult men smoked, compared
to 19% of adult women.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
• But is advertising responsible?
• To what extent can advertising shape
people’s attitudes and behavior?
• Exactly what is an attitude, anyway, and
how is it changed?
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF
ATTITUDES
Attitudes
Evaluations of people,
objects, and ideas.
People are not neutral observers of the
world.
They evaluate what they encounter.
They form attitudes.
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF
ATTITUDES
Attitudes are made up of three parts that together
form our evaluation of the “attitude object”:
1.An affective component, consisting of your
emotional reactions toward the attitude object.
2.A cognitive component, consisting of your
thoughts and beliefs about the attitude object.
3.A behavioral component, consisting of your
actions or observable behavior toward the
attitude object.
THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF
ATTITUDES
1. What is your affective reaction when you see a
certain car?
– Perhaps you have feelings of excitement.
– If you are a U.S. autoworker examining a new foreign-
made model, maybe you feel anger and resentment.
2. What is your cognitive reaction?
– What beliefs do you hold about the car’s attributes?
– Perhaps you admire its hybrid engine that makes it one
of the most fuel efficient cars you can buy.
3. What is your behavioral reaction?
– Do you go to a dealership and test-drive the car and
actually buy one?
Where Do Attitudes Come From?
One provocative answer that some attitudes, at
least, are linked to our genes.
• Identical twins share more attitudes than
fraternal twins, even when raised in different
homes, never knowing each other.
• Some attitudes are an indirect function of our
genetic makeup, related to things like our
temperament and personality.
Where Do Attitudes Come From?
Even if there is a genetic component, our
social experiences clearly play a large
role in shaping our attitudes.
Not all attitudes are created equally.
Though all attitudes have affective,
cognitive, and behavioral components,
any given attitude can be based more on
one type of experience than another.
Cognitively Based Attitude
An attitude based primarily on people’s
beliefs about the properties of an
attitude object.
Sometimes our attitudes are based
primarily on the relevant facts, such as
the objective merits of an automobile.
• How many miles to the gallon does it
get?
• Does it have side-impact air bags?
Affectively Based Attitude
An attitude based more on people’s feelings
and values than on their beliefs about the
nature of an attitude object.
Sometimes we simply like a car,
regardless of how many miles to the
gallon it gets.
Occasionally we even feel great about
something or someone in spite of having
negative beliefs.
If affectively based attitudes do not come
from examining the facts, where do they
come from? They can result from:
1. People’s values, such as religious and
moral beliefs,
2. Sensory reaction, such as liking the
taste of chocolate ,
3. Aesthetic reaction, such as admiring a
painting or the lines and color of a car,
4. Conditioning.
The phenomenon whereby a stimulus
that elicits an emotional response is
repeatedly paired with a neutral stimulus
that does not until the neutral stimulus
takes on the emotional properties of the
first stimulus.
Classical Conditioning
Classical conditioning works this way:
A stimulus that elicits an emotional response is
accompanied by a neutral stimulus that does not
until eventually the neutral stimulus elicits the
emotional response by itself.
• Suppose that when you were a child, you
experienced feelings of warmth and love when
you visited your grandmother.
• Suppose also that her house always smelled
faintly of mothballs.
• Eventually, the smell of mothballs alone will
trigger the emotions you experienced during
your visits, through the process of classical
conditioning.
The phenomenon whereby behaviors that
people freely choose to perform increase
or decrease in frequency, depending on
whether they are followed by positive
reinforcement or punishment.
Operant Conditioning
Operant Conditioning
In operant conditioning, behaviors we freely
perform become more or less frequent,
depending on whether they are followed by a
reward (positive reinforcement) or punishment.
How does this apply to attitudes?
Imagine:
• A 4-year-old white girl goes to the playground
and begins to play with an African American
girl.
• Her father expresses strong disapproval, telling
her, “We don’t play with that kind of child.”
• It won’t take long before the child associates
interacting with African Americans with
disapproval, thereby adopting her father’s racist
attitudes.
Although affectively based attitudes come
from many sources, we can group them
into one family because they:
(1)Do not result from a rational examination of
the issues,
(2)Are not governed by logic (e.g., persuasive
arguments about the issues seldom
change an affectively based attitude), and
(3)Are often linked to people’s values, so that
trying to change them challenges those
values.
Behaviorally Based Attitude
An attitude based on observations of
how one behaves toward an attitude
object.
According to Daryl Bem’s (1972) self-
perception theory, under certain
circumstances, people don’t know how
they feel until they see how they behave.
We can form our attitudes based on our
observations of our own behavior.
Behaviorally Based Attitude
An attitude based on observations of
how one behaves toward an attitude
object.
People infer their attitudes from their behavior only
under certain conditions.
1. Their initial attitude has to be weak or
ambiguous.
2. People infer their attitudes from their behavior
only when there are no other plausible
explanations for their behavior.
Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes
Explicit Attitudes
Attitudes that we consciously
endorse and can easily report.
Implicit Attitudes
Attitudes that are involuntary,
uncontrollable, and at times unconscious.
Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes
Consider Sam, a white, middle-class college
student who genuinely believes that all races
are equal and abhors any kind of racial bias.
This is Sam’s explicit attitude, in the sense that it
is his conscious evaluation of members of other
races that governs how he chooses to act.
For instance, consistent with his explicit attitude,
Sam recently signed a petition in favor of
affirmative action policies at his university.
Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes
Sam has grown up in a culture in which there are
many negative stereotypes about minority
groups, however, and it is possible that some of
these negative ideas have seeped into him in
ways of which he is not fully aware.
When Sam is around African Americans, for
example, perhaps some negative feelings are
triggered automatically and unintentionally. If
so, he has a negative implicit attitude toward
African Americans.
Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes
People can have explicit and implicit
attitudes toward virtually anything, not just
other races.
For example, students can believe explicitly
that they hate math but have a more
positive attitude at an implicit level.
HOW DO ATTITUDES CHANGE?
• When attitudes change, they often do so in
response to social influence.
• Our attitudes toward everything from a
presidential candidate to a brand of laundry
detergent can be influenced by what other
people do or say.
• This is why attitudes are of such interest to
social psychologists—even something as
personal and internal as an attitude is a highly
social phenomenon, influenced by the imagined
or actual behavior of other people.
Changing Attitudes by Changing Behavior:
Cognitive Dissonance Theory Revisited
As we noted in Chapter 6, people experience
dissonance:
• When they do something that threatens their
image of themselves as decent, kind, and
honest.
• Particularly if there is no way they can explain
away this behavior as due to external
circumstances.
When you can’t find external justification for your
behavior, you will attempt to find internal
justification by bringing the two cognitions (your
attitude and your behavior) closer together.
Changing Attitudes by Changing Behavior:
Cognitive Dissonance Theory Revisited
Suppose you don’t want to rub your new father-in-
law the wrong way by arguing with him about
politics. You might go along with a mildly positive
remark about a politician you actually dislike.
Counterattitudinal advocacy, a process by which
people are induced to state publicly an opinion or
attitude that runs counter to their own private
attitudes, creates dissonance.
When this is accomplished with a minimum of
external justification, it results in a change in
people’s private attitude in the direction of the
public statement.
Communication (e.g., a speech or television
ad) advocating a particular side of an
issue.
Persuasive Communication
How should you construct a message so that it
would really change people’s attitudes?
Persuasive Communications
and Attitude Change
Yale Attitude Change Approach
The study of the conditions under which
people are most likely to change their
attitudes in response to persuasive
messages, focusing on “who said what
to whom”—the source of the
communication, the nature of the
communication, and the nature of the
audience.
The Central and Peripheral
Routes to Persuasion
Elaboration Likelihood Model
An explanation of the two ways in which
persuasive communications can cause attitude
change:
• Centrally, when people are motivated and have
the ability to pay attention to the arguments in
the communication.
• peripherally, when people do not pay attention
to the arguments but are instead swayed by
surface characteristics.
The Central and Peripheral
Routes to Persuasion
Under certain conditions, people are motivated to
pay attention to the facts in a communication,
and so they will be most persuaded when these
facts are logically compelling.
Central Route to Persuasion
The case whereby people elaborate on a persuasive
communication, listening carefully to and thinking
about the arguments, as occurs when people
have both the ability and the motivation to listen
carefully to a communication.
The Central and Peripheral
Routes to Persuasion
Under other conditions, people are not motivated
to pay attention to the facts; instead, they notice
only the surface characteristics of the message,
such as how long it is and who is delivering it.
Peripheral Route to Persuasion
The case whereby people do not elaborate
on the arguments in a persuasive
communication but are instead swayed by
peripheral cues.
The Motivation to Pay Attention
to the Arguments
One thing that determines whether people
are motivated to pay attention to a
communication is the personal relevance
of the topic:
• How important is the topic to a person’s
well-being?
The Motivation to Pay Attention
to the Arguments
The more personally relevant an issue is,
the more willing people are to pay
attention to the arguments in a speech,
and therefore the more likely people are
to take the central route to persuasion.
The Motivation to Pay Attention
to the Arguments
People high in the need for cognition are more likely to
form their attitudes by paying close attention to
relevant arguments (i.e., via the central route),
whereas people low in the need for cognition are
more likely to rely on peripheral cues, such as how
attractive or credible a speaker is.
Need for Cognition
A personality variable reflecting the
extent to which people engage in and
enjoy effortful cognitive activities.
The Ability to Pay Attention
to the Arguments
When people are unable to pay close
attention to the arguments, they are
swayed more by peripheral cues.
• Status of communicator
• Liking or trusting communicator
Therefore someone with a weak argument
can create distractions (e.g., loud music)
to make people more susceptible to
peripheral influence.
How to Achieve Long-Lasting
Attitude Change
Compared to people who base their
attitudes on peripheral cues, people who
base their attitudes on a careful analysis
of the arguments will be:
• More likely to maintain this attitude over
time,
• More likely to behave consistently with
this attitude,
• More resistant to counterpersuasion.
Emotion and Attitude Change
• Before people will consider your carefully
constructed arguments, you have to get
their attention.
• One way is to grab people’s attention by
playing to their emotions.
Source of images: Microsoft Office Online.
Fear-Arousing Communications
Fear-Arousing Communications
Persuasive messages that attempt to
change people’s attitudes by
arousing their fears.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
Fear-Arousing Communications
Do fear-arousing
communications work?
• If a moderate amount of fear is
created and people believe that
listening to the message will teach
them how to reduce this fear, they
will be motivated to analyze the
message carefully and will likely
change their attitudes via the central
route.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
A group of smokers who watched a graphic film depicting lung cancer and then
read pamphlets with specific instructions about how to quit smoking reduced
their smoking significantly more than people who were shown only the film or
only the pamphlet.
Fear-Arousing Communications
Fear-arousing appeals will also
fail if they are so strong that
they overwhelm people.
If people are scared to death,
they will become defensive,
deny the importance of the
threat, and be unable to think
rationally about the issue.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
Emotions as a Heuristic
Heuristic–Systematic Model of
Persuasion
An explanation of the two ways in which
persuasive communications can cause
attitude change: either systematically
processing the merits of the arguments or
using mental shortcuts (heuristics) –
(e.g., thinking, “Experts are always right”)
Emotions as a Heuristic
Interestingly, our emotions and moods can
themselves act as heuristics to determine
our attitudes.
When trying to decide attitude about
something, we often rely on the “How do I
feel about it?”-heuristic.
If we feel good, we must have a positive
attitude; if we feel bad, it’s thumbs down.
Emotions as a Heuristic
• The problem with the “How do I feel about it?” heuristic
is that we can make mistakes about what is causing
our mood, misattributing feelings created by one
source to another.
• If so, people might make a bad decision.
• Once you get a new couch home, you
might discover that it no longer makes
you feel all that great.
• Advertisers and retailers want to create good feelings
while they present their product (e.g., by playing
appealing music or showing pleasant images), hoping
that people will attribute at least some of those feelings
to the product they are trying to sell.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
Emotion and Different
Types of Attitudes
Several studies have shown that it is best
to fight fire with fire:
• If an attitude is cognitively based, try to
change it with rational arguments.
• If it is affectively based, try to change it
with emotional appeals.
Emotion and Different
Types of Attitudes
• Some ads stress the objective merits of a
product, such as an ad for an air conditioner or
a vacuum cleaner that discusses its price,
efficiency, and reliability.
• Other ads stress emotions and values, such as
ones for perfume or designer jeans that try to
associate their brands with sex, beauty, and
youthfulness, rather than saying anything about
the objective qualities of the product.
• Which kind of ad is most effective?
Culture and Different
Types of Attitudes
• Perhaps people in Western cultures base their
attitudes more on concerns about individuality
and self-improvement, whereas people in Asian
cultures base their attitudes more on concerns
about their standing in their social group, such
as their families.
• If so, advertisements that stress individuality
and self-improvement might work better in
Western cultures, and advertisements that
stress one’s social group might work better in
Asian cultures.
RESISTING PERSUASIVE
MESSAGES
Attitude Inoculation
Making people immune to attempts to
change their attitudes by initially
exposing them to small doses of the
arguments against their position.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
RESISTING PERSUASIVE
MESSAGES
Being Alert to Product Placement
• When an advertisement comes on during a TV
show, people often decide to press the mute
button on the remote control or to get up and
get a snack.
• To counteract this tendency to tune out,
advertisers look for ways of displaying their
wares during the show itself.
• With this technique, called product placement,
companies pay the makers of a TV show or
movie to incorporate their product into the script.
RESISTING PERSUASIVE
MESSAGES
Being Alert to Product Placement
• When an advertisement comes on during a TV
show, people often decide to press the mute
button on the remote control or to get up and
get a snack.
• To counteract this tendency to tune out,
advertisers look for ways of displaying their
wares during the show itself.
• With this technique, called product placement,
companies pay the makers of a TV show or
movie to incorporate their product into the script.
• When people are forewarned, they analyze
what they see and hear more carefully and as
a result are likely to avoid attitude change.
• Without such warnings, people pay little
attention to the persuasive attempts and tend
to accept them at face value.
• So before kids watch TV or sending them off to
the movies, it is good to remind them that they
are likely to encounter several attempts to
change their attitudes.
RESISTING PERSUASIVE
MESSAGES
Resisting Peer Pressure
• Peer pressure is linked to values and emotions, playing
on their fear of rejection and their desire for freedom
and autonomy.
• In adolescence, peers become an important source of
social approval—perhaps the most important—and can
dispense powerful rewards for holding certain attitudes
or behaving in certain ways, such as using drugs or
engaging in unprotected sex.
• What is needed is a technique that will make young
people more resistant to attitude change attempts via
peer pressure so that they will be less likely to engage
in dangerous behaviors.
RESISTING PERSUASIVE
MESSAGES
Resisting Peer Pressure
• One possibility is to extend the logic of the attitude
inoculation approach to more affectively based
persuasion techniques, such as peer pressure.
• In addition to inoculating people with doses of logical
arguments that they might hear, we could also inoculate
them with samples of the kinds of emotional appeals
they might encounter.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
When Persuasion Attempts Boomerang:
Reactance Theory
Reactance Theory
The idea that when people feel their
freedom to perform a certain
behavior is threatened, an
unpleasant state of reactance is
aroused, which they can reduce by
performing the threatened behavior.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
WHEN WILL ATTITUDES
PREDICT BEHAVIOR?
The relationship between attitudes and behavior is not
simple, as shown in a classic study (LaPiere, 1934):
• In the early 1930s, Richard LaPiere embarked on a cross-
country sightseeing trip with a young Chinese couple.
• Prejudice against Asians was common in the United States
at this time, so at each hotel, campground, and restaurant
they entered, LaPiere worried that his friends would be
refused service.
• To his surprise, of the 251 establishments he and his
friends visited, only one refused to serve them.
• And yet when surveyed, only one replied that it would
serve a Chinese visitor. More than 90 percent said they
definitely would not; the rest were undecided.
Predicting Spontaneous Behaviors
Attitudes will predict spontaneous behaviors only
when they are highly accessible to people.
Attitude Accessibility
The strength of the association between an
attitude object and a person’s evaluation
of that object, measured by the speed
with which people can report how they
feel about the object.
Predicting Deliberative Behaviors
Theory of Planned Behavior
The idea that the best predictors of a
person’s planned, deliberate behaviors
are the person’s attitudes toward
specific behaviors, subjective norms,
and perceived behavioral control.
Predicting Deliberative Behaviors
Specific behaviors: The theory of planned
behavior holds that only specific attitudes toward
the behavior in question can be expected to
predict that behavior.
Subjective norms: We also need to measure
people’s subjective norms—their beliefs about
how people they care about will view the
behavior in question.
Perceived behavioral control: Intentions are
influenced by the ease with which they believe
they can perform the behavior.
THE POWER OF ADVERTISING
It turns out that people are influenced by
advertisements more than they think.
The results of over three hundred split
cable market tests indicate that
advertising does work, particularly for
new products.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
Effective ads worked quickly,
increasing sales substantially
within the first six months
they were shown.
THE POWER OF ADVERTISING
Subliminal Messages
Words or pictures that are not consciously
perceived but may nevertheless influence
people’s judgments, attitudes, and behaviors.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
Simply stated, there is no evidence
that the types of subliminal
messages encountered in
everyday life have any influence
on people’s behavior.
Advertising, Cultural Stereotypes,
and Social Behavior
• Advertisements transmit cultural
stereotypes in their words and images,
subtly linking products with desired
images.
• Advertisements can also reinforce and
perpetuate stereotypical ways of thinking
about social groups.
Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
• Gender stereotypes are particularly pervasive in
advertising imagery.
• Men are depicted as doers, women as observers.
Advertising, Cultural Stereotypes, and
Social Behavior
Stereotype Threat
The apprehension experienced by
members of a group that their behavior
might confirm a cultural stereotype.
Social Psychology
Elliot Aronson
University of California, Santa Cruz
Timothy D. Wilson
University of Virginia
Robin M. Akert
Wellesley College
slides by Travis Langley
Henderson State University
6th edition

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

AS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive model
AS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive modelAS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive model
AS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive modelJill Jan
 
Ch-5 Cognitive perspective.pptx
Ch-5 Cognitive perspective.pptxCh-5 Cognitive perspective.pptx
Ch-5 Cognitive perspective.pptxanayanoor28
 
Forensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notes
Forensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notesForensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notes
Forensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notesElla Warwick
 
AP Psychology - Research Methods
AP Psychology - Research MethodsAP Psychology - Research Methods
AP Psychology - Research MethodsTaylor Stevens
 
Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2
Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2
Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2Haley Ho
 
Chapter 4 Social Cognition
Chapter 4 Social CognitionChapter 4 Social Cognition
Chapter 4 Social Cognitionqulbabbas4
 
Social perception & attribution
Social perception & attributionSocial perception & attribution
Social perception & attributionIvy Greatel Valcobero
 
Attitude Formation and Change
Attitude Formation and ChangeAttitude Formation and Change
Attitude Formation and ChangeSeta Wicaksana
 
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Vinu Arpitha
 
Heuristics and biases
Heuristics and biasesHeuristics and biases
Heuristics and biasesSebnem Ozdemir
 
Heuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasion
Heuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasionHeuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasion
Heuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasionMr. Arindam Bhattacharjee
 
Positive Cognitive States and Processes.pptx
Positive Cognitive States and Processes.pptxPositive Cognitive States and Processes.pptx
Positive Cognitive States and Processes.pptxAQSA SHAHID
 
Structured equation model
Structured equation modelStructured equation model
Structured equation modelKing Abidi
 
Chapter 1 Ap Psych- Research Methods
Chapter 1 Ap Psych- Research MethodsChapter 1 Ap Psych- Research Methods
Chapter 1 Ap Psych- Research MethodsDr. J's AP Psych Class
 
Chapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychologyChapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychologyBilalAhmed717
 
George kelly
George kellyGeorge kelly
George kellyRAHUL TOMER
 
Appel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 Slides
Appel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 SlidesAppel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 Slides
Appel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 Slideskimappel
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

AS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive model
AS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive modelAS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive model
AS Abnormal Psychology Cognitive model
 
Ch-5 Cognitive perspective.pptx
Ch-5 Cognitive perspective.pptxCh-5 Cognitive perspective.pptx
Ch-5 Cognitive perspective.pptx
 
Forensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notes
Forensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notesForensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notes
Forensic Psychology - AQA A Level revision notes
 
AP Psychology - Research Methods
AP Psychology - Research MethodsAP Psychology - Research Methods
AP Psychology - Research Methods
 
Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2
Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2
Relationships AQA Paper 3 PSYCHOLOGY A2
 
Attribution theory
Attribution theoryAttribution theory
Attribution theory
 
Chapter 4 Social Cognition
Chapter 4 Social CognitionChapter 4 Social Cognition
Chapter 4 Social Cognition
 
Attitude
AttitudeAttitude
Attitude
 
Social perception & attribution
Social perception & attributionSocial perception & attribution
Social perception & attribution
 
Social cognition
Social  cognitionSocial  cognition
Social cognition
 
Attitude Formation and Change
Attitude Formation and ChangeAttitude Formation and Change
Attitude Formation and Change
 
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance
 
Heuristics and biases
Heuristics and biasesHeuristics and biases
Heuristics and biases
 
Heuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasion
Heuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasionHeuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasion
Heuristic-systematic model (HSM) of persuasion
 
Positive Cognitive States and Processes.pptx
Positive Cognitive States and Processes.pptxPositive Cognitive States and Processes.pptx
Positive Cognitive States and Processes.pptx
 
Structured equation model
Structured equation modelStructured equation model
Structured equation model
 
Chapter 1 Ap Psych- Research Methods
Chapter 1 Ap Psych- Research MethodsChapter 1 Ap Psych- Research Methods
Chapter 1 Ap Psych- Research Methods
 
Chapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychologyChapter 1 social psychology
Chapter 1 social psychology
 
George kelly
George kellyGeorge kelly
George kelly
 
Appel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 Slides
Appel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 SlidesAppel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 Slides
Appel PSY 150 403 Chapter 1 Slides
 

Andere mochten auch

The social animal
The social animalThe social animal
The social animaljcklp1
 
Aronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perceptionAronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perceptionmrkramek
 
Social attitudes
Social attitudesSocial attitudes
Social attitudesUtkarsh Modi
 
Communication theories comm
Communication theories commCommunication theories comm
Communication theories commTarek Mahmoud
 
Psychology Of Aggression
Psychology Of Aggression Psychology Of Aggression
Psychology Of Aggression Heba Essawy, MD
 
Aggression In Social Psychology
Aggression In Social Psychology Aggression In Social Psychology
Aggression In Social Psychology vibha yadav
 

Andere mochten auch (10)

The social animal
The social animalThe social animal
The social animal
 
Aronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perceptionAronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perception
 
Elliot aronson
Elliot aronsonElliot aronson
Elliot aronson
 
Fhs attitudes
Fhs attitudesFhs attitudes
Fhs attitudes
 
Social attitudes
Social attitudesSocial attitudes
Social attitudes
 
Communication theories comm
Communication theories commCommunication theories comm
Communication theories comm
 
Attitudes
AttitudesAttitudes
Attitudes
 
Psychology Of Aggression
Psychology Of Aggression Psychology Of Aggression
Psychology Of Aggression
 
Aggression In Social Psychology
Aggression In Social Psychology Aggression In Social Psychology
Aggression In Social Psychology
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 

Ähnlich wie Aronson 6e ch7_attitudes

Kuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdf
Kuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdfKuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdf
Kuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdfMohdAkif12
 
Chapter12
Chapter12Chapter12
Chapter12drellen
 
PSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDES
PSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDESPSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDES
PSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDESkimappel
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychologyErikaBeam
 
Social Psychology
Social PsychologySocial Psychology
Social PsychologyAlex Holub
 
2011 ch 14
2011 ch 142011 ch 14
2011 ch 14Alex Holub
 
Attitude- Formation and Change
Attitude- Formation and ChangeAttitude- Formation and Change
Attitude- Formation and ChangeZulfiquer Ahmed Amin
 
PGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptx
PGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptxPGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptx
PGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptxbibha737
 
psychological theories of crime.pptx
psychological theories of crime.pptxpsychological theories of crime.pptx
psychological theories of crime.pptxresearch gate
 
Behavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.ppt
Behavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.pptBehavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.ppt
Behavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.pptMoisesMacaranasJr
 
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognition
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognitionAttitudes, beliefs and social cognition
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognitionindianeducation
 
Ch 6 Powerpoint
Ch 6 PowerpointCh 6 Powerpoint
Ch 6 Powerpointguestb617b7
 

Ähnlich wie Aronson 6e ch7_attitudes (20)

Kuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdf
Kuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdfKuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdf
Kuliah 5-attitude and attitude change.pdf
 
Chapter12
Chapter12Chapter12
Chapter12
 
PSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDES
PSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDESPSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDES
PSY 150 403 Chapter 13 SLIDES
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
Social Psychology
Social PsychologySocial Psychology
Social Psychology
 
2011 ch 14
2011 ch 142011 ch 14
2011 ch 14
 
Attitude- Formation and Change
Attitude- Formation and ChangeAttitude- Formation and Change
Attitude- Formation and Change
 
PoP wk 14
PoP wk 14PoP wk 14
PoP wk 14
 
PGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptx
PGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptxPGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptx
PGDM-Unit-3 Attitutes.pptx
 
Attitudes
Attitudes Attitudes
Attitudes
 
Attitude and prejudice
Attitude and prejudiceAttitude and prejudice
Attitude and prejudice
 
psychological theories of crime.pptx
psychological theories of crime.pptxpsychological theories of crime.pptx
psychological theories of crime.pptx
 
Behavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.ppt
Behavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.pptBehavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.ppt
Behavior and Attitudes Chicken and Eggs.ppt
 
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognition
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognitionAttitudes, beliefs and social cognition
Attitudes, beliefs and social cognition
 
Ch 6 Powerpoint
Ch 6 PowerpointCh 6 Powerpoint
Ch 6 Powerpoint
 
ATTITUDES.ppt
ATTITUDES.pptATTITUDES.ppt
ATTITUDES.ppt
 
Attitudes
AttitudesAttitudes
Attitudes
 
Attitudes
AttitudesAttitudes
Attitudes
 
Attitude
Attitude Attitude
Attitude
 

KĂźrzlich hochgeladen

Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfSherif Taha
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.christianmathematics
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxnegromaestrong
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and ModificationsMJDuyan
 
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptxMagic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptxdhanalakshmis0310
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...Poonam Aher Patil
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfAdmir Softic
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701bronxfugly43
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...christianmathematics
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxRamakrishna Reddy Bijjam
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Jisc
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptxMaritesTamaniVerdade
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentationcamerronhm
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfciinovamais
 

KĂźrzlich hochgeladen (20)

Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding  Accommodations and ModificationsUnderstanding  Accommodations and Modifications
Understanding Accommodations and Modifications
 
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptxMagic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
Magic bus Group work1and 2 (Team 3).pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
Accessible Digital Futures project (20/03/2024)
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 

Aronson 6e ch7_attitudes

  • 1. Social Psychology Elliot Aronson University of California, Santa Cruz Timothy D. Wilson University of Virginia Robin M. Akert Wellesley College slides by Travis Langley Henderson State University 6th edition
  • 2. Chapter 7 Attitudes and Attitude Changes: Influencing Thoughts and Feelings “By persuading others, we convince ourselves.” — Junius
  • 3. THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF ATTITUDES Advertising can have powerful effects. • Until the early twentieth century, men bought 99% of cigarettes sold. Then advertisers began targeting female buyers. • In 1955, there were twice as many male as female smokers in the United States. • Although the smoking rate has decreased overall, women have almost caught up to men. In 2004 23% of adult men smoked, compared to 19% of adult women. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 4. THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF ATTITUDES • Although the smoking rate has decreased overall, women have almost caught up to men. In 2004 23% of adult men smoked, compared to 19% of adult women. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online. • But is advertising responsible? • To what extent can advertising shape people’s attitudes and behavior? • Exactly what is an attitude, anyway, and how is it changed?
  • 5. THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF ATTITUDES Attitudes Evaluations of people, objects, and ideas. People are not neutral observers of the world. They evaluate what they encounter. They form attitudes.
  • 6. THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF ATTITUDES Attitudes are made up of three parts that together form our evaluation of the “attitude object”: 1.An affective component, consisting of your emotional reactions toward the attitude object. 2.A cognitive component, consisting of your thoughts and beliefs about the attitude object. 3.A behavioral component, consisting of your actions or observable behavior toward the attitude object.
  • 7. THE NATURE AND ORIGIN OF ATTITUDES 1. What is your affective reaction when you see a certain car? – Perhaps you have feelings of excitement. – If you are a U.S. autoworker examining a new foreign- made model, maybe you feel anger and resentment. 2. What is your cognitive reaction? – What beliefs do you hold about the car’s attributes? – Perhaps you admire its hybrid engine that makes it one of the most fuel efficient cars you can buy. 3. What is your behavioral reaction? – Do you go to a dealership and test-drive the car and actually buy one?
  • 8. Where Do Attitudes Come From? One provocative answer that some attitudes, at least, are linked to our genes. • Identical twins share more attitudes than fraternal twins, even when raised in different homes, never knowing each other. • Some attitudes are an indirect function of our genetic makeup, related to things like our temperament and personality.
  • 9. Where Do Attitudes Come From? Even if there is a genetic component, our social experiences clearly play a large role in shaping our attitudes. Not all attitudes are created equally. Though all attitudes have affective, cognitive, and behavioral components, any given attitude can be based more on one type of experience than another.
  • 10. Cognitively Based Attitude An attitude based primarily on people’s beliefs about the properties of an attitude object. Sometimes our attitudes are based primarily on the relevant facts, such as the objective merits of an automobile. • How many miles to the gallon does it get? • Does it have side-impact air bags?
  • 11. Affectively Based Attitude An attitude based more on people’s feelings and values than on their beliefs about the nature of an attitude object. Sometimes we simply like a car, regardless of how many miles to the gallon it gets. Occasionally we even feel great about something or someone in spite of having negative beliefs.
  • 12. If affectively based attitudes do not come from examining the facts, where do they come from? They can result from: 1. People’s values, such as religious and moral beliefs, 2. Sensory reaction, such as liking the taste of chocolate , 3. Aesthetic reaction, such as admiring a painting or the lines and color of a car, 4. Conditioning.
  • 13. The phenomenon whereby a stimulus that elicits an emotional response is repeatedly paired with a neutral stimulus that does not until the neutral stimulus takes on the emotional properties of the first stimulus. Classical Conditioning
  • 14. Classical conditioning works this way: A stimulus that elicits an emotional response is accompanied by a neutral stimulus that does not until eventually the neutral stimulus elicits the emotional response by itself. • Suppose that when you were a child, you experienced feelings of warmth and love when you visited your grandmother. • Suppose also that her house always smelled faintly of mothballs. • Eventually, the smell of mothballs alone will trigger the emotions you experienced during your visits, through the process of classical conditioning.
  • 15. The phenomenon whereby behaviors that people freely choose to perform increase or decrease in frequency, depending on whether they are followed by positive reinforcement or punishment. Operant Conditioning
  • 16. Operant Conditioning In operant conditioning, behaviors we freely perform become more or less frequent, depending on whether they are followed by a reward (positive reinforcement) or punishment. How does this apply to attitudes? Imagine: • A 4-year-old white girl goes to the playground and begins to play with an African American girl. • Her father expresses strong disapproval, telling her, “We don’t play with that kind of child.” • It won’t take long before the child associates interacting with African Americans with disapproval, thereby adopting her father’s racist attitudes.
  • 17.
  • 18. Although affectively based attitudes come from many sources, we can group them into one family because they: (1)Do not result from a rational examination of the issues, (2)Are not governed by logic (e.g., persuasive arguments about the issues seldom change an affectively based attitude), and (3)Are often linked to people’s values, so that trying to change them challenges those values.
  • 19. Behaviorally Based Attitude An attitude based on observations of how one behaves toward an attitude object. According to Daryl Bem’s (1972) self- perception theory, under certain circumstances, people don’t know how they feel until they see how they behave. We can form our attitudes based on our observations of our own behavior.
  • 20. Behaviorally Based Attitude An attitude based on observations of how one behaves toward an attitude object. People infer their attitudes from their behavior only under certain conditions. 1. Their initial attitude has to be weak or ambiguous. 2. People infer their attitudes from their behavior only when there are no other plausible explanations for their behavior.
  • 21. Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes Explicit Attitudes Attitudes that we consciously endorse and can easily report. Implicit Attitudes Attitudes that are involuntary, uncontrollable, and at times unconscious.
  • 22. Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes Consider Sam, a white, middle-class college student who genuinely believes that all races are equal and abhors any kind of racial bias. This is Sam’s explicit attitude, in the sense that it is his conscious evaluation of members of other races that governs how he chooses to act. For instance, consistent with his explicit attitude, Sam recently signed a petition in favor of affirmative action policies at his university.
  • 23. Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes Sam has grown up in a culture in which there are many negative stereotypes about minority groups, however, and it is possible that some of these negative ideas have seeped into him in ways of which he is not fully aware. When Sam is around African Americans, for example, perhaps some negative feelings are triggered automatically and unintentionally. If so, he has a negative implicit attitude toward African Americans.
  • 24. Explicit versus Implicit Attitudes People can have explicit and implicit attitudes toward virtually anything, not just other races. For example, students can believe explicitly that they hate math but have a more positive attitude at an implicit level.
  • 25. HOW DO ATTITUDES CHANGE? • When attitudes change, they often do so in response to social influence. • Our attitudes toward everything from a presidential candidate to a brand of laundry detergent can be influenced by what other people do or say. • This is why attitudes are of such interest to social psychologists—even something as personal and internal as an attitude is a highly social phenomenon, influenced by the imagined or actual behavior of other people.
  • 26. Changing Attitudes by Changing Behavior: Cognitive Dissonance Theory Revisited As we noted in Chapter 6, people experience dissonance: • When they do something that threatens their image of themselves as decent, kind, and honest. • Particularly if there is no way they can explain away this behavior as due to external circumstances. When you can’t find external justification for your behavior, you will attempt to find internal justification by bringing the two cognitions (your attitude and your behavior) closer together.
  • 27. Changing Attitudes by Changing Behavior: Cognitive Dissonance Theory Revisited Suppose you don’t want to rub your new father-in- law the wrong way by arguing with him about politics. You might go along with a mildly positive remark about a politician you actually dislike. Counterattitudinal advocacy, a process by which people are induced to state publicly an opinion or attitude that runs counter to their own private attitudes, creates dissonance. When this is accomplished with a minimum of external justification, it results in a change in people’s private attitude in the direction of the public statement.
  • 28. Communication (e.g., a speech or television ad) advocating a particular side of an issue. Persuasive Communication How should you construct a message so that it would really change people’s attitudes?
  • 29. Persuasive Communications and Attitude Change Yale Attitude Change Approach The study of the conditions under which people are most likely to change their attitudes in response to persuasive messages, focusing on “who said what to whom”—the source of the communication, the nature of the communication, and the nature of the audience.
  • 30.
  • 31. The Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion Elaboration Likelihood Model An explanation of the two ways in which persuasive communications can cause attitude change: • Centrally, when people are motivated and have the ability to pay attention to the arguments in the communication. • peripherally, when people do not pay attention to the arguments but are instead swayed by surface characteristics.
  • 32. The Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion Under certain conditions, people are motivated to pay attention to the facts in a communication, and so they will be most persuaded when these facts are logically compelling. Central Route to Persuasion The case whereby people elaborate on a persuasive communication, listening carefully to and thinking about the arguments, as occurs when people have both the ability and the motivation to listen carefully to a communication.
  • 33. The Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion Under other conditions, people are not motivated to pay attention to the facts; instead, they notice only the surface characteristics of the message, such as how long it is and who is delivering it. Peripheral Route to Persuasion The case whereby people do not elaborate on the arguments in a persuasive communication but are instead swayed by peripheral cues.
  • 34.
  • 35. The Motivation to Pay Attention to the Arguments One thing that determines whether people are motivated to pay attention to a communication is the personal relevance of the topic: • How important is the topic to a person’s well-being?
  • 36. The Motivation to Pay Attention to the Arguments The more personally relevant an issue is, the more willing people are to pay attention to the arguments in a speech, and therefore the more likely people are to take the central route to persuasion.
  • 37.
  • 38. The Motivation to Pay Attention to the Arguments People high in the need for cognition are more likely to form their attitudes by paying close attention to relevant arguments (i.e., via the central route), whereas people low in the need for cognition are more likely to rely on peripheral cues, such as how attractive or credible a speaker is. Need for Cognition A personality variable reflecting the extent to which people engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activities.
  • 39. The Ability to Pay Attention to the Arguments When people are unable to pay close attention to the arguments, they are swayed more by peripheral cues. • Status of communicator • Liking or trusting communicator Therefore someone with a weak argument can create distractions (e.g., loud music) to make people more susceptible to peripheral influence.
  • 40. How to Achieve Long-Lasting Attitude Change Compared to people who base their attitudes on peripheral cues, people who base their attitudes on a careful analysis of the arguments will be: • More likely to maintain this attitude over time, • More likely to behave consistently with this attitude, • More resistant to counterpersuasion.
  • 41. Emotion and Attitude Change • Before people will consider your carefully constructed arguments, you have to get their attention. • One way is to grab people’s attention by playing to their emotions. Source of images: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 42. Fear-Arousing Communications Fear-Arousing Communications Persuasive messages that attempt to change people’s attitudes by arousing their fears. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 43. Fear-Arousing Communications Do fear-arousing communications work? • If a moderate amount of fear is created and people believe that listening to the message will teach them how to reduce this fear, they will be motivated to analyze the message carefully and will likely change their attitudes via the central route. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 44. A group of smokers who watched a graphic film depicting lung cancer and then read pamphlets with specific instructions about how to quit smoking reduced their smoking significantly more than people who were shown only the film or only the pamphlet.
  • 45. Fear-Arousing Communications Fear-arousing appeals will also fail if they are so strong that they overwhelm people. If people are scared to death, they will become defensive, deny the importance of the threat, and be unable to think rationally about the issue. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 46. Emotions as a Heuristic Heuristic–Systematic Model of Persuasion An explanation of the two ways in which persuasive communications can cause attitude change: either systematically processing the merits of the arguments or using mental shortcuts (heuristics) – (e.g., thinking, “Experts are always right”)
  • 47. Emotions as a Heuristic Interestingly, our emotions and moods can themselves act as heuristics to determine our attitudes. When trying to decide attitude about something, we often rely on the “How do I feel about it?”-heuristic. If we feel good, we must have a positive attitude; if we feel bad, it’s thumbs down.
  • 48. Emotions as a Heuristic • The problem with the “How do I feel about it?” heuristic is that we can make mistakes about what is causing our mood, misattributing feelings created by one source to another. • If so, people might make a bad decision. • Once you get a new couch home, you might discover that it no longer makes you feel all that great. • Advertisers and retailers want to create good feelings while they present their product (e.g., by playing appealing music or showing pleasant images), hoping that people will attribute at least some of those feelings to the product they are trying to sell. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 49. Emotion and Different Types of Attitudes Several studies have shown that it is best to fight fire with fire: • If an attitude is cognitively based, try to change it with rational arguments. • If it is affectively based, try to change it with emotional appeals.
  • 50. Emotion and Different Types of Attitudes • Some ads stress the objective merits of a product, such as an ad for an air conditioner or a vacuum cleaner that discusses its price, efficiency, and reliability. • Other ads stress emotions and values, such as ones for perfume or designer jeans that try to associate their brands with sex, beauty, and youthfulness, rather than saying anything about the objective qualities of the product. • Which kind of ad is most effective?
  • 51.
  • 52. Culture and Different Types of Attitudes • Perhaps people in Western cultures base their attitudes more on concerns about individuality and self-improvement, whereas people in Asian cultures base their attitudes more on concerns about their standing in their social group, such as their families. • If so, advertisements that stress individuality and self-improvement might work better in Western cultures, and advertisements that stress one’s social group might work better in Asian cultures.
  • 53. RESISTING PERSUASIVE MESSAGES Attitude Inoculation Making people immune to attempts to change their attitudes by initially exposing them to small doses of the arguments against their position. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 54. RESISTING PERSUASIVE MESSAGES Being Alert to Product Placement • When an advertisement comes on during a TV show, people often decide to press the mute button on the remote control or to get up and get a snack. • To counteract this tendency to tune out, advertisers look for ways of displaying their wares during the show itself. • With this technique, called product placement, companies pay the makers of a TV show or movie to incorporate their product into the script.
  • 55. RESISTING PERSUASIVE MESSAGES Being Alert to Product Placement • When an advertisement comes on during a TV show, people often decide to press the mute button on the remote control or to get up and get a snack. • To counteract this tendency to tune out, advertisers look for ways of displaying their wares during the show itself. • With this technique, called product placement, companies pay the makers of a TV show or movie to incorporate their product into the script. • When people are forewarned, they analyze what they see and hear more carefully and as a result are likely to avoid attitude change. • Without such warnings, people pay little attention to the persuasive attempts and tend to accept them at face value. • So before kids watch TV or sending them off to the movies, it is good to remind them that they are likely to encounter several attempts to change their attitudes.
  • 56. RESISTING PERSUASIVE MESSAGES Resisting Peer Pressure • Peer pressure is linked to values and emotions, playing on their fear of rejection and their desire for freedom and autonomy. • In adolescence, peers become an important source of social approval—perhaps the most important—and can dispense powerful rewards for holding certain attitudes or behaving in certain ways, such as using drugs or engaging in unprotected sex. • What is needed is a technique that will make young people more resistant to attitude change attempts via peer pressure so that they will be less likely to engage in dangerous behaviors.
  • 57. RESISTING PERSUASIVE MESSAGES Resisting Peer Pressure • One possibility is to extend the logic of the attitude inoculation approach to more affectively based persuasion techniques, such as peer pressure. • In addition to inoculating people with doses of logical arguments that they might hear, we could also inoculate them with samples of the kinds of emotional appeals they might encounter. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 58. When Persuasion Attempts Boomerang: Reactance Theory Reactance Theory The idea that when people feel their freedom to perform a certain behavior is threatened, an unpleasant state of reactance is aroused, which they can reduce by performing the threatened behavior. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 59. WHEN WILL ATTITUDES PREDICT BEHAVIOR? The relationship between attitudes and behavior is not simple, as shown in a classic study (LaPiere, 1934): • In the early 1930s, Richard LaPiere embarked on a cross- country sightseeing trip with a young Chinese couple. • Prejudice against Asians was common in the United States at this time, so at each hotel, campground, and restaurant they entered, LaPiere worried that his friends would be refused service. • To his surprise, of the 251 establishments he and his friends visited, only one refused to serve them. • And yet when surveyed, only one replied that it would serve a Chinese visitor. More than 90 percent said they definitely would not; the rest were undecided.
  • 60. Predicting Spontaneous Behaviors Attitudes will predict spontaneous behaviors only when they are highly accessible to people. Attitude Accessibility The strength of the association between an attitude object and a person’s evaluation of that object, measured by the speed with which people can report how they feel about the object.
  • 61. Predicting Deliberative Behaviors Theory of Planned Behavior The idea that the best predictors of a person’s planned, deliberate behaviors are the person’s attitudes toward specific behaviors, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control.
  • 62. Predicting Deliberative Behaviors Specific behaviors: The theory of planned behavior holds that only specific attitudes toward the behavior in question can be expected to predict that behavior. Subjective norms: We also need to measure people’s subjective norms—their beliefs about how people they care about will view the behavior in question. Perceived behavioral control: Intentions are influenced by the ease with which they believe they can perform the behavior.
  • 63.
  • 64. THE POWER OF ADVERTISING It turns out that people are influenced by advertisements more than they think. The results of over three hundred split cable market tests indicate that advertising does work, particularly for new products. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online. Effective ads worked quickly, increasing sales substantially within the first six months they were shown.
  • 65. THE POWER OF ADVERTISING Subliminal Messages Words or pictures that are not consciously perceived but may nevertheless influence people’s judgments, attitudes, and behaviors. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online. Simply stated, there is no evidence that the types of subliminal messages encountered in everyday life have any influence on people’s behavior.
  • 66. Advertising, Cultural Stereotypes, and Social Behavior • Advertisements transmit cultural stereotypes in their words and images, subtly linking products with desired images. • Advertisements can also reinforce and perpetuate stereotypical ways of thinking about social groups. Source of image: Microsoft Office Online.
  • 67. • Gender stereotypes are particularly pervasive in advertising imagery. • Men are depicted as doers, women as observers.
  • 68. Advertising, Cultural Stereotypes, and Social Behavior Stereotype Threat The apprehension experienced by members of a group that their behavior might confirm a cultural stereotype.
  • 69. Social Psychology Elliot Aronson University of California, Santa Cruz Timothy D. Wilson University of Virginia Robin M. Akert Wellesley College slides by Travis Langley Henderson State University 6th edition

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. (Ajzen, 2001; Eagly & Chaiken, 1998; Fazio, 2000; Petty, Cacioppo, Strathman, & Priester, 2005).
  2. One study, for example, found that identical twins had more similar attitudes toward such things as the death penalty and jazz than fraternal twins did (Martin et al., 1986). People may have inherited a temperament and personality from their parents that made them predisposed to like jazz more than rock-and-roll.
  3. (Zanna & Rempel, 1988)
  4. An attitude based more on emotions and values than on an objective appraisal of pluses and minuses is called an affectively based attitude (Breckler & Wiggins, 1989; Zanna & Rempel, 1988). As a guide to which attitudes are likely to be affectively based, consider the topics that etiquette manuals suggest should not be discussed at a dinner party: politics, sex, and religion. People seem to vote more with their hearts than their minds, for example, caring more about how they feel about a candidate than their beliefs about his or her specific policies (Abelson, Kinder, Peters, & Fiske, 1982; Granberg & Brown, 1989). In fact, it has been estimated that one-third of the electorate knows virtually nothing about specific politicians but nonetheless has strong feelings about them (Redlawsk, 2002; Wattenberg, 1987).
  5. People’s feelings about such issues as abortion, the death penalty, and premarital sex are often based more on their values than on a cold examination of the facts. The function of such attitudes is not so much to paint an accurate picture of the world as to express and validate one’s basic value system (Maio & Olson, 1995; Schwartz, 1992; Smith, Bruner, & White, 1956; Snyder & DeBono, 1989).
  6. (Olson & Fazio, 2001). (Cacioppo, Marshall-Goodell, Tassinary, & Petty, 1992; De Houwer, Baeyens, & Eelen, 1994)
  7. Attitudes can take on a positive or negative affect through either classical or operant conditioning, as shown in Figure 7.1 (Cacioppo et al., 1992; Kuykendall & Keating, 1990).
  8. How can we tell if an attitude is more affectively or cognitively based? See the Try It! exercise in the textbook for one way to measure the bases of people’s attitudes.
  9. For example, suppose you asked a friend how much she likes to exercise. If she replies, “Well, I guess I like it, because I always seem to be going for a run or heading over to the gym to work out,” we would say she has a behaviorally based attitude. Her attitude is based more on an observation of her behavior than on her cognitions or affect. As a guide to which attitudes are likely to be affectively based, consider the topics that etiquette manuals suggest should not be discussed at a dinner party: politics, sex, and religion. People seem to vote more with their hearts than their minds, for example, caring more about how they feel about a candidate than their beliefs about his or her specific policies (Abelson, Kinder, Peters, & Fiske, 1982; Granberg & Brown, 1989). In fact, it has been estimated that one-third of the electorate knows virtually nothing about specific politicians but nonetheless has strong feelings about them (Redlawsk, 2002; Wattenberg, 1987).
  10. If your friend already has a strong attitude toward exercising, she does not have to observe her behavior to infer how she feels about it. If your friend believes she exercises to lose weight or because her doctor has ordered her to, she is unlikely to assume that she runs and works out because she enjoys it. (See Chapter 5 for a more detailed description of self-perception theory.)
  11. (Bassili & Brown, 2005; Fazio & Olson, 2003; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Wilson, Lindsey, & Schooler, 2000)
  12. (Devine, 1989a)
  13. (Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002)
  14. (Hofmann, Gawronski, Gschwendner, Le, & Schmitt, 2005; Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002; Rudman, 2004) A variety of techniques have been developed to measure people’s implicit attitudes, some of which we discussed in Chapter 3. One of the most popular is the Implicit Association Test or IAT (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998; Nosek, Greenwald, & Banaji, 2005), in which people categorize words or pictures on a computer. Rather than going into detail about how this test works, we encourage you to visit a Web site where you can take the test yourself and read more about how it is constructed (http://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit).
  15. Attitudes do sometimes change. In America, for example, the popularity of the president often seems to rise and fall with surprising speed. In the weeks before the tragic events of September 11, 2001, for example, only about 50 percent of Americans said that they approved of the job that George W. Bush was doing as president. In the days right after 9/11, his approval rating jumped to 86 percent. Since then his popularity has gone up and down. Right before the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March of 2003 his approval rating had dropped to 57 percent; a month later, it rose to 71 percent (PollingReport.com, 2003). In November of 2005, as the war dragged on, only 37 percent of Americans approved of President Bush’s performance.
  16. Drawing on their experiences during World War II, when they worked for the United States armed forces to increase the morale of U.S. soldiers (Stouffer, Suchman, De Vinney, Star, & Williams, 1949), Carl Hovland and his colleagues (Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953) conducted many experiments on the conditions under which people are most likely to be influenced by persuasive communications. In essence, they studied “who says what to whom,” looking at the source of the communication (e.g., how expert or attractive the speaker is), the communication itself (e.g., the quality of the arguments; whether the speaker presents both sides of the issue), and the nature of the audience (e.g., which kinds of appeals work with hostile or friendly audiences).
  17. This approach yielded a great deal of useful information on how people change their attitudes in response to persuasive communications; some of this information is summarized in Figure 7.2. As the research mounted, however, a problem became apparent: Many aspects of persuasive communications turned out to be important, but it was not clear which were more important than others—that is, it was unclear when one factor should be emphasized over another. For example, let’s return to that job you have with the American Cancer Society. The marketing manager wants to see your ad next month! If you were to read the many Yale Attitude Change studies, you might find lots of useful information about who should say what to whom in order to construct a persuasive communication. However, you might also find yourself saying, “There’s a lot of information here, and I’m not sure where I should place the most emphasis. Should I focus on who delivers the ads? Or should I worry more about the content of the message?”
  18. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986; Petty et al., 2005), for example, specifies when people will be influenced by what the speech says (i.e., the logic of the arguments) and when they will be influenced by more superficial characteristics (e.g., who gives the speech or how long it is).
  19. Petty and Cacioppo (1986) call this the central route to persuasion.
  20. Here people will not be swayed by the logic of the arguments because they are not paying close attention to what the communicator says. Instead, they are persuaded if the surface characteristics of the message—such as the fact that it is long or is delivered by an expert or attractive communicator—make it seem like a reasonable one. Petty and Cacioppo call this the peripheral route to persuasion because people are swayed by things peripheral to the message itself.
  21. What determines whether people take the central versus the peripheral route to persuasion? The key is whether people have both the motivation and the ability to pay attention to the facts. If people are truly interested in the topic and thus motivated to pay close attention to the arguments, and if they people have the ability to pay attention—for example, if nothing is distracting them—they are more likely to take the central route.
  22. For example, consider the issue of whether Social Security benefits should be reduced. How personally relevant is this to you? If you are a 72-year-old whose sole income is from Social Security, the issue is extremely relevant; if you are a 20-year-old from a well-to-do family, the issue has little personal relevance.
  23. Petty, Cacioppo, & Goldman (1981): Figure 7.4 shows what happened when an issue is highly relevant to the listeners. This finding illustrates a general rule: When an issue is personally relevant, people pay attention to the arguments in a speech and will be persuaded to the extent that the arguments are sound—the “proof” of the speech, in Aristotle’s words. When an issue is not personally relevant, people pay less attention to the arguments. Instead, they will take a mental shortcut, following such peripheral rules as “Prestigious speakers can be trusted” (Chen & Chaiken, 1999; Fabrigar, Priester, Petty, & Wegener, 1998).
  24. This is a personality variable that reflects the extent to which people engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activities.
  25. An exchange of letters appeared in the an advice column about whether drugs such as cocaine and marijuana should be legalized. Readers wrote in with all sorts of compelling arguments on both sides of the issue, and it was difficult to figure out which arguments had the most merit. One reader resolved this dilemma by relying less on the content of the arguments than on the prestige and expertise of the source of the arguments.
  26. (Chaiken, 1980; Mackie, 1987; Petty, Haugtvedt, & Smith, 1995; Petty & Wegener, 1998) In one study, for example, people changed their attitudes either by analyzing the logic of the arguments or by using peripheral cues. When the participants were telephoned ten days later, those who had analyzed the logic of the arguments were more likely to have maintained their new attitude—that is, attitudes that changed via the central route to persuasion lasted longer (Chaiken, 1980).
  27. Now you know exactly how to construct your ad for the American Cancer Society, right? Well, not quite. If you are going to show your antismoking ad on television, for example, how can you be sure people will watch the ad when it comes on, instead of changing the channel or heading for the refrigerator?
  28. Public service ads often take this approach by trying to scare people into practicing safer sex, wearing seat belts, and staying away from drugs. For example, as of January, 2001, cigarette packs sold in Canada are required to display graphic pictures of diseased gums and other body parts that cover at least 50% of the outside label (Carroll, 2003).
  29. (Petty, 1995; Rogers, 1983)
  30. Why? Watching the film scared people, and giving them the pamphlet reassured them that there was a way to reduce this fear—by following the instructions on how to quit. (Leventhal, Watts, & Pagano, 1967) Seeing only the pamphlet didn’t work very well because there was little fear motivating people to read it carefully. Seeing only the film didn’t work very well either because people are likely to tune out a message that raises fear but does not give information about how to reduce it. This may explain why some attempts to frighten people into changing their attitudes and behaviors fail: They succeed in scaring people but do not provide specific recommendations to help them reduce their fear (Hoog, Stroebe, & de Wit, 2005; Ruiter, Abraham, & Kok, 2001).
  31. So if you have decided to arouse people’s fear in your ad for the American Cancer Society, keep these points in mind: First, try to create enough fear to motivate people to pay attention to your arguments but not so much fear that people will tune out or distort what you say. Second, include some specific recommendations about how to stop smoking so that people will be reassured that paying close attention to your arguments will help them reduce their fear.
  32. Recall from Chapter 3 that heuristics are mental shortcuts people use to make judgments quickly and efficiently. In the present context, a heuristic is a simple rule people use to decide what their attitude is without having to spend a lot of time analyzing every little detail about the matter. Examples of such heuristics include thinking that length equals strength (i.e., long messages are more persuasive than short ones).
  33. Now this probably sounds like a pretty good rule to follow, and like most heuristics, it is—most of the time. Suppose you need a new couch and go to a furniture store to look around. You see one in your price range and are trying to decide whether to buy it. If you use the “How do I feel about it?” heuristic, you do a quick check of your feelings and emotions. If you feel great while you’re sitting in the couch in the store, you will probably buy it. (Clore & Schnall, 2005; Forgas, 1995; Schwarz & Clore, 1988)
  34. The problem is that sometimes it is difficult to tell where our feelings come from. Is it really the couch that made you feel great, or is it something completely unrelated? Maybe you were in a good mood to begin with, or maybe on the way to the store you heard your favorite song on the radio. Or perhaps a salesperson greeted you with a big smile and an ice-cold drink when you walked in the door, and that brightened your mood.
  35. The success of various attitude change techniques depends on the type of attitude we are trying to change. As we saw earlier, not all attitudes are created equally; some are based more on beliefs about the attitude object (cognitively based attitudes), whereas others are based more on emotions and values (affectively based attitudes). (Fabrigar & Petty, 1999; Shavitt, 1989; Snyder & DeBono, 1989)
  36. Shavitt (1990): Participants looked at different kinds of advertisements. Some were for “utilitarian products,” such as air conditioners and coffee. People’s attitudes toward such products tend to be formed after an appraisal of the utilitarian aspects of the products (e.g., how energy-efficient an air conditioner is) and thus are cognitively based. The other items were “social identity products,” such as perfume and greeting cards. People’s attitudes toward these types of products tend to reflect a concern with how they appear to others and are more affectively based.
  37. To test this hypothesis, researchers created different ads for the same product that stressed independence (e.g., an ad for shoes said, “It’s easy when you have the right shoes”) or interdependence (e.g., “The shoes for your family”) and showed them to both Americans and Koreans (Han & Shavitt, 1994). The Americans were persuaded most by the ads stressing independence, and the Koreans were persuaded by the ads stressing interdependence. The researchers also analyzed actual magazine advertisements in the United States and Korea and found that these ads were in fact different: American ads tended to emphasize individuality, self-improvement, and benefits of the product for the individual consumer, whereas Korean ads tended to emphasize the family, concerns about others, and benefits for one’s social group. In general, then, advertisements work best if they are tailored to the kind of attitude they are trying to change.
  38. By considering “small doses” of arguments against their position, people become immune to later, full-blown attempts to change their attitudes. Having considered the arguments beforehand, people are relatively immune to the effects of the later communication, just as exposing people to a small amount of a virus can inoculate them against exposure to the full-blown viral disease. In contrast, if people have not thought much about the issue—that is, if they formed their attitude via the peripheral route—they are particularly susceptible to an attack on that attitude using logical appeals.
  39. In the movie E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, for example, Elliot left a trail of Reese’s Pieces to draw out E.T., after which sales of the candy boomed. In a 1996 James Bond movie, Agent 007 abandoned his usual Aston Martin and drove a BMW Z3 roadster, reportedly in return for a $3 million fee from the BMW company. Moviegoers responded with $240 million in advance sales for the car (York, 2001). Children can be especially vulnerable. One study, for example, found that the more children in grades 5–8 had seen movies in which adults smoked cigarettes, the more positive were their attitudes toward smoking (Sargent et al., 2002; Wakefield, Flay, & Nichter, 2003).
  40. (Sagarin, Cialdini, Rice, & Serna, 2002; Wood & Quinn, 2003)
  41. One study found that the best predictor of whether an adolescent smokes marijuana is whether he or she has a friend who does so (Allen, Donohue, & Griffin, 2003; Yamaguchi & Kandel, 1984).
  42. Consider Jake, a 13-year-old who is hanging out with some classmates, many of whom are smoking cigarettes. The classmates begin to tease Jake about not smoking, calling him a wimp. One of them even lights a cigarette and holds it in front of Jake, daring him to take a puff. Many 13-year-olds, facing such pressure, would cave in. But suppose that we immunized Jake to such social pressures by exposing him to mild versions of them and showing him ways to combat these pressures. We might have him role-play a situation where a friend calls him a chicken for not smoking a cigarette and teach him to respond by saying, “I’d be more of a chicken if I smoked it just to impress you.” Would this help him resist the more powerful pressures exerted by his classmates? Several programs designed to prevent smoking in adolescents suggest that it would. In one, psychologists used a role-playing technique with seventh graders, very much like the one we described (McAlister, Perry, Killen, Slinkard, & Maccoby, 1980). The researchers found that these students were significantly less likely to smoke three years after the study, compared to a control group that had not participated in the program. This result is encouraging and has been replicated in similar programs designed to reduce smoking (Chassin, Presson, & Sherman, 1990; Falck & Craig, 1988; Killen, 1985).
  43. In one study, for example, researchers placed one of two signs in the bathrooms on a college campus, in an attempt to get people to stop writing graffiti on the restroom walls (Pennebaker & Sanders, 1976). One sign read, “Do not write on these walls under any circumstances.” The other gave a milder prohibition: “Please don’t write on these walls.” The researchers returned two weeks later and observed how much graffiti had been written since they posted the signs. As they predicted, significantly more people wrote graffiti in the bathrooms with the “Do not write …” sign than with the “Please don’t write …” sign. Similarly, people who receive strong admonitions against smoking, taking drugs, or getting their nose pierced become more likely to perform these behaviors in order to restore their sense of personal freedom and choice (Bushman & Stack, 1996; Dowd et al., 1988).
  44. LaPiere’s study was not, of course, a controlled experiment. As he acknowledged, there are several reasons why his results may not show an inconsistency between people’s attitudes and behavior. He had no way of knowing whether the proprietors who answered his letter were the same people who had served him and his friends, and even if they were, people’s attitudes could have changed in the months between the time they served the Chinese couple and the time they received the letter. Nonetheless, the lack of correspondence between people’s attitudes and what they actually did was so striking that we might question the earlier assumption that behavior routinely follows from attitudes.
  45. (Fazio, 1990, 2000; Fazio & Roskos-Ewoldsen, 2005; Kallgren & Wood, 1986) When accessibility is high, your attitude comes to mind whenever you see or think about the attitude object. When accessibility is low, your attitude comes to mind more slowly. It follows that highly accessible attitudes will be more likely to predict spontaneous behaviors because people are more likely to be thinking about their attitude when they are called on to act.
  46. In many circumstances, behavior is not spontaneous but deliberative and planned. Most of us think seriously about where to go to college, whether to accept a new job, or where to spend our vacation. Under these conditions, the accessibility of our attitude is less important. Given enough time to think about an issue, even people with inaccessible attitudes can bring to mind how they feel. It is only when we have to decide how to act on the spot, without time to think it over, that accessibility matters (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993; Fazio, 1990).
  47.  In one study, researchers asked a sample of married women for their attitudes toward birth control pills, ranging from the general (their attitude toward birth control) to the specific (their attitude toward using birth control pills during the next two years; see Table 7.1). Two years later, they asked the women whether they had used birth control pills at any time since the last interview. As Table 7.1 shows, the women’s general attitude toward birth control did not predict their use of birth control at all. This general attitude did not take into account other factors that could have influenced their decision, such as concern about the long-term effects of the pill and their attitude toward other forms of birth control. The more specific the question was about the act of using birth control pills, the better this attitude predicted their actual behavior (Davidson & Jaccard, 1979).
  48. Considerable research supports the idea that asking people about these determinants of their intentions—attitudes toward specific behaviors, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control—increases the ability to predict their planned, deliberative behaviors, such deciding what job to accept, whether to wear a seat belt, whether to check oneself for disease, and whether to use condoms when having sex (Albarracin, Johnson, Fishbein, & Muellerleile, 2001; Armitage & Conner, 2001; Cooke & Sheeran, 2004; Trafimow & Finlay, 1996).
  49. (Abraham & Lodish, 1990; Liebert & Sprafkin, 1988; Ryan, 1991; Wells, 1997; Wilson, Houston, & Meyers, 1998) The best evidence that advertising works comes from studies using what are called split cable market tests. Advertisers work in conjunction with cable television companies and grocery stores, showing a target commercial to a randomly selected group of people. They keep track of what people buy by giving potential consumers special ID cards that are scanned at checkout counters; thus they can tell whether people who saw the commercial for ScrubaDub laundry detergent actually buy more ScrubaDub—the best measure of advertising effectiveness. (Lodish et al., 1995)
  50. Hidden commands do not cause us to line up and buy popcorn any more than we normally do, and the subliminal commands on self-help tapes do not (unfortunately!) help us quit smoking or lose weight (Brannon & Brock, 1994; Merikle, 1988; Moore, 1992; Pratkanis, 1992; Theus, 1994; Trappey, 1996).
  51. As seen in Figure 7.9 here, one review found that women were more likely to be portrayed in dependent roles (that is, not in a position of power but dependent on someone else) than men in every country that was examined (Furnham & Mak, 1999).
  52. Where do commercials fit in? A recent study found that advertisements that portray women in stereotypical ways can trigger stereotype threat (Davies, Spencer, Quinn, & Gerhardstein, 2002). College women and men who were good at math watched television ads that showed women in stereotypical ways (e.g., an ad for an acne product in which a young woman bounced up and down on a bed) or counterstereotypical ways (e.g., an ad in which a woman impressed a man with her knowledge about cars). The students then took a difficult math test. As you can see in Figure 7.10, women and men performed at similar levels when they saw the counterstereotypical ads (there was no significant difference between men and women in this condition). Women performed significantly worse than men when they saw the stereotypical commercials.