4. How
do
plants
adapt
to
new
environments?
Clausen,
Keck,
Heisey
5. What
is
the
geneRc
basis
of
adaptaRon?
Lowry & Willis 2010 PLoS Biology
6. Supplementary Figure 1
How
common
is
parallel
adaptaRon?
LETTERS
LETTERS
Jin et al. 2008 Nat. Gen. rice
Teqing
Wild
is a Hop
inverted
Supplementary Figure 1. The phenotypes of Teqing and wild ri
ferences
whereas
delineate
To est
teosinte,
addition
this purp
the haplo
Rose Andrew
>95% of
somes. T
the initia
Studer et al. 2011 Nat. Gen.
Figure 1 Teosinte and maize p
Figure 1 Teosinte and maize plants. (a) Highly branched teosinte plant.
gene flow
a
b
c
d a
7. Does
parallel
phenotype
=
parallel
genotype?
Colosimo et al. 2005 Science
Kovach et al. 2009 PNAS
8. • Highland
adapta-on
in
teosinte
• AdapRve
introgression
in
highland
maize
• Parallel
adaptaRon
in
highland
maize
• Future
direcRons
13. 0.4
0.6
0.8
r2=0.34
0.2
Inversion
Frequency
Inversion Frequency
1.0
Large
inversions
common
and
show
alRtudinal
clines
0.0
edutitla neewteb pihsnoitaler a sa detneserp snoisrevni eerht fo senilc lanidutitlA 8S erugiF
hcihw rof sPNS fo rebmun a sa( ecnatsiD .noisrevni hcae nihtiw ecnatsid epytolpah dna
ytisrevid wol niam eht ni epytolpah latsid tsom eht morf epytolpah hcae fo )reffid yeht
)C dna m4vnI )B ,n1vIn )A .snoitalupop etacidni sroloC .sixa-y eht ni si puorg epytolpah
.d9vnI
Inv1n
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Inversion
Frequency
Altitude (m)
AlRtude
Figure S4 LD in chromosome 9 among mexicana populations based on SNPs with minor
allele frequency >0.1.
LD plot of two inversions on
chr. 9 in mexicana
Inv9d
Inv9d
AlRtude
Figure S8 Altitudinal clines of three inversions presented as a relationship between altitude
and haplotype distance within each inversion. Distance (as a number of SNPs for which
they differ) of each haplotype from the most distal haplotype in the t
al.
Gene-cs
2012
Fang
e main low diversity
haplotype group is in the y-axis. Colors indicate populations. A) nIv1n, B) Inv4m and C)
14. GWAS,
frequency
distribuRons
idenRfy
candidate
SNPs
Combined GWAS for temperature/altitude
Inv1n
Inv9d
allele freq. differentiation
Hierarchical Fst Outlier
heterozygosity
15. Candidate
loci
overlap
QTL
for
pigment
&
macrohairs
photo by Ed Coe
Inv4n
Moose et al. 2004 Genetics
b1 in maize
Lauter et al. 2004 Genetics
mhl1 in maize
16. Candidate
SNPs
enriched
in
regulatory
regions
regulatory
<-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐>
coding
enrichment
Climate
Hancock
et
al.
2011
Science
Fraser
2013
Genome
Research
Alelle
Freq.
Morphology
(maize)
17. • Highland
adaptaRon
in
teosinte
• Adap-ve
introgression
in
highland
maize
• Parallel
adaptaRon
in
highland
maize
• Future
direcRons
18. Maize
colonizaRon
of
highlands
domestication in
Mexico lowland
9,000 BP
Matsuoka et al. 2002; Piperno 2006; Perry et al. 2006; Piperno et al. 2009; van Heerwaarden et al. 2011;
19. Maize
colonizaRon
of
highlands
6,000 BP
Mexico highland
domestication in
Mexico lowland
9,000 BP
maize
Photo
by
Pesach
Lubinsky
Matsuoka et al. 2002; Piperno 2006; Perry et al. 2006; Piperno et al. 2009; van Heerwaarden et al. 2011;
mexicana
20. Parallel
phenotypes
and
admixture
with
teosinte
mexicana
parviglumis
Highland
Lowland
Photos: Ruairidh Sawers, LANGEBIO
Lauter et al. (2004) Genetics
2500
2000
m 1500
1000
500
0
mexicana
parviglumis
South/Caribbean
West
Highland
van
Heerwaarden
et
al.
2011
PNAS
21. maize
&
teosinte
sympatric
populaRon
sampling
Ixtlan
Puruandiro
El
Porvenir
Santa
Clara
Xochimilco
Opopeo
Tenango
del
Aire
San
Pedro
Amatlan
Nabogame
Sample:
✦
✦
✦
✦
✦
9
sympatric
populaRon
pairs
2
allopatric
references
120
mexicana
95
maize
40,000
SNPs
Hufford
et
al.
2013
PLoS
Gene-cs
27. IdenRfying
admixture
along
the
genome
Chromosome
4:
maize
(STRUCTURE)
0
50
100
150
200
250
• STRUCTURE:
Bayesian
assignment
to
k=2
pops
using
admixture
LD
28. IdenRfying
admixture
along
the
genome
Chromosome
4:
maize
(STRUCTURE)
0
50
100
150
200
250
150
200
250
Chromosome
4:
maize
(HapMix)
0
50
100
Mb
• STRUCTURE:
Bayesian
assignment
to
k=2
pops
using
admixture
LD
• HAPMIX:
HMM
of
chromosomal
ancestry
along
genome
29. IdenRfying
admixture
along
the
genome
Chromosome
4:
maize
(STRUCTURE)
0
50
100
150
200
250
150
200
250
Chromosome
4:
maize
(HapMix)
0
50
100
Mb
• STRUCTURE:
Bayesian
assignment
to
k=2
pops
using
admixture
LD
• HAPMIX:
HMM
of
chromosomal
ancestry
along
genome
• Shared
regions:
long
shared
haplotypes,
low
FST,
many
shared
SNPs
30. Shared
introgression
from
teosinte
into
maize
El Porvenir
Opopeo
Santa Clara
Nabogame
Puruandiro
Xochimilco
Tenango del Aire
San Pedro
Ixtlan
Allopatric
31. Shared
introgression
from
teosinte
into
maize
El Porvenir
Opopeo
Santa Clara
Nabogame
Puruandiro
Xochimilco
Tenango del Aire
San Pedro
Ixtlan
Allopatric
Inv4n
32. Shared
introgression
from
teosinte
into
maize
El Porvenir
Opopeo
Santa Clara
Nabogame
Puruandiro
Xochimilco
Tenango del Aire
San Pedro
Ixtlan
Allopatric
Inv4n
33. Shared
introgression
from
teosinte
into
maize
El Porvenir
Opopeo
Santa Clara
Nabogame
Puruandiro
Xochimilco
Tenango del Aire
San Pedro
Ixtlan
Allopatric
Inv4n
34. Shared
introgression
from
teosinte
into
maize
El Porvenir
Opopeo
Santa Clara
Nabogame
Puruandiro
Xochimilco
Tenango del Aire
San Pedro
Ixtlan
Allopatric
Fst high vs. low elevation maize
35. 6
of
9
introgressions
overlap
with
teosinte
QTL
Inv4n
Moose et al. 2004 Genetics
b1 in maize
Lauter et al. 2004 Genetics
36. Introgressed
pops
show
highland
phenotypes,
cold
adaptaRon
Introgression
No
Introgression
37. • Highland
adaptaRon
in
teosinte
• AdapRve
introgression
in
highland
maize
• Parallel
adapta-on
in
highland
maize
• Future
direcRons
38. Maize
colonizaRon
of
highlands
6,000 BP
Mexico highland
Mexico lowland
9,000 BP
Matsuoka et al. 2002; Piperno 2006; Perry et al. 2006; Piperno et al. 2009; van Heerwaarden et al. 2011;
39. Maize
colonizaRon
of
highlands
6,000 BP
Mexico highland
6,000
BP
Mexico lowland
9,000 BP
Matsuoka et al. 2002; Piperno 2006; Perry et al. 2006; Piperno et al. 2009; van Heerwaarden et al. 2011;
S.
America
lowland
40. Maize
colonizaRon
of
highlands
6,000 BP
Mexico highland
6,000
BP
Mexico lowland
S.
America
lowland
9,000 BP
4,000
BP
S.
America
Highland
Matsuoka et al. 2002; Piperno 2006; Perry et al. 2006; Piperno et al. 2009; van Heerwaarden et al. 2011;
41. differences between lowland and highland maize in terms of
heterozygosity and differentiation from parviglumis (Fig. S3).
Structure analysis (21) of all Mexican accessions lends support
for this magnitude of introgression (Fig. 2). The three subspecies
form clearly separated clusters, but evidence of admixture is
the West Mexico group as the most ancestral population (Fig.
To mitigate the impact of introgression, we used a sli
modified approach that excludes both parviglumis and mexi
and calculates genetic drift with respect to ancestral freque
inferred from domesticated maize alone. Because the ge
photo by Matt Hufford
photo by Monthon Wachirasettakul
Parallel
phenotypic
adaptaRon
to
highlands
Mexico
Andes
Fig. 1. (A) Map of sampled maize accessions colored by genetic group. (B) First three genetic PCs of all sampled accessions.
• shared
phenotypes
between
Mexico
and
Andes
PNAS | January 18, 2011 | vol. 108 | no. 3 |
van Heerwaarden et al.
• geneRc
data
supports
independent
origin
• independent
mutaRons?
adapRve
gene
flow?
van
Heerwaarden
et
al.
2011
PNAS
42. differences between lowland and highland maize in terms of
heterozygosity and differentiation from parviglumis (Fig. S3).
Structure analysis (21) of all Mexican accessions lends support
for this magnitude of introgression (Fig. 2). The three subspecies
form clearly separated clusters, but evidence of admixture is
the West Mexico group as the most ancestral population (Fig.
To mitigate the impact of introgression, we used a sli
modified approach that excludes both parviglumis and mexi
and calculates genetic drift with respect to ancestral freque
inferred from domesticated maize alone. Because the ge
photo by Matt Hufford
photo by Monthon Wachirasettakul
Parallel
phenotypic
adaptaRon
to
highlands
Mexico
Andes
Fig. 1. (A) Map of sampled maize accessions colored by genetic group. (B) First three genetic PCs of all sampled accessions.
• shared
phenotypes
between
Mexico
and
Andes
PNAS | January 18, 2011 | vol. 108 | no. 3 |
van Heerwaarden et al.
• geneRc
data
supports
independent
origin
• independent
mutaRons?
adapRve
gene
flow?
van
Heerwaarden
et
al.
2011
PNAS
43. Mexican/Andean
maize
data
•
96
samples
from
four
highland/lowland
populaRons
•
100K
SNPS
(GBS
&
Maize
SNP50
array)
Shohei Takuno
44. Modeling
demography
to
idenRfy
outliers
!
Mexico
Using&da/di&for¶meter&estimation
Mexico Simulation
Observation
Observed
td
te
NB
Simulated
highland allele frequency
0.9NA
0.27NA
tf=6,000
0.63NA
Lowland
Highland
Lowland
!
South&America
S. America
td
te
NB
Observed
Simulated
0.5NA
0.48NA
0.02NA
tf=4,000
>2NA
Lowland
Highland
Lowland
lowland allele frequency
•
Demographic
models
fit
with
joint
site
freq.
spectrum
(δa/δi)
•
Simulate
to
generate
null
allele
frequency
distribuRon
45. !
! Using&da/di&
Using&da/di&for¶meter&
AdaptaRon
quanRtaRve,
but
not
parallel
Mexico Observation
Mexico
Observation
Simulation
unique S. America
Highland
-Log p-value Fst S. America
Maize
shared SNPs
Lowland
REPORTS
unique Mexico
Yi
et
al.
2010
Science
South&America
Han
Chinese
South&America
-Log p-value Fst Mexico
•
Many
SNPs:
adaptaRon
quanRtaRve
•
Sharing
in
Mex./teosinte,
not
Mex./S.
America
•
•
Lowland
Lowland
95%
loci
differ,
80%
from
standing
variaRon
No
enrichment
of
shared
genes
Tibetan
Fig. 1. Two-dimensional unfolded site frequency spectrum for SNPs in Tibetan (x axis) and Han (y
population samples. The number of SNPs detected is color-coded according to the logarithmic s
plotted on the right. Arrows indicate a pair of intronic SNPs from the EPAS1 gene that show stro
elevated derived allele frequencies in the Tibetan sample compared with the Han sample.
Table 1. Genes with strongest frequency changes in the Tibetan population. The top 30 PBS v
candidate genes within 100 kb of these loci are noted. For FXYD, F indicates Phe; Y, Tyr; D,
Gene
Description
Lowland
EPAS1
C1orf124
DISC1
ATP6V1E2
SPP1
PKLR
Lowland
Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (HIF-2a)
Hypothetical protein LOC83932
Disrupted in schizophrenia 1
Adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), H+ transporting, lysosomal 31 kD, V1
Secreted phosphoprotein 1
Pyruvate kinase, liver, and RBC
51. Full
genomes,
new
highlands
Ne
Li & Durbin 2011 Nature
Years
Vince
Buffalo
MaL
Hufford
52. In
progress:
mapping
pops
&
more
genomes
M Hufford (ISU), R. Sawers (Langebio)
Summer 2013
S. Flint-Garcia (MU)
Winter 2012
MX x MX
F2
SA x SA
F2
Highland Landrace (PT) x B73
BC2 NILs
Highland x Lowland Landrace
F2 populations
54. In
progress:
GWAS
on
temperature
phenotypes
Root Signals
y–1)
4000
20
rature (°C)
after 2h of
ction of June
or the site of
Lycopersicon
precipitation
herry tomato
ilting score of
e fully turgid
tes that they
own are mean
10
8
Chilling sensitivity
Wilting score
2
1
6
Gitanshu Munjal
4
Japonica temperate
Japonica tropical
Indica
2
0
Temperate
Tropical
0
0
20
40
60
Latitude (°)
Fig. 2. Shoot wilting during root Fig. 3. Chilling sensitivity as a function
chilling Plant
Height,
Highland
Temperatures for Oryza sativa
at 6°C for Zea mays of latitude of origin
genotypes of temperate or genotypes of japonica (temperate or
tropical ancestry. A wilting score tropical) or indica ancestry. A chilling
of ‘3’ designates that shoots sensitivity score of ‘9’ designates that
were fully flaccid, whereas ‘0’ all leaves were yellow as a result of
designates fully turgid. Shown water stress at root temperatures
are mean ± SE for 8 and 13 below 13°C, whereas ‘1’ designates
genotypes of temperate and that none were. Data for yellowing
tropical ancestry, respectively. from Mackill & Lei (1997) and data for
(unpublished)
latitude from Zhao et al. (2011).
der rhizosphere chilling, which is associated with wilting (Cruz et al. 2013),
Sofiane Mezmouk
Arnold Bloom
55. Conclusions
• Parallel
phenotypic
adaptaRon
of
Zea
to
highlands
• Important
roles
for
inversions,
regulatory
mutaRons
• AdaptaRon
to
high
alRtude
quanRtaRve
• Parallel
geneRcs
in
highland
Mexico
via
adapRve
gene
flow
• Different
geneRcs
in
S.
America,
likely
from
standing
variaRon