The document discusses the Distributed Ground Station Network (DGSN), a proposed global network of small ground stations for tracking and communicating with small satellites as an open service. The key features of DGSN are that it uses a network of low-cost ground stations placed globally, connected via the internet, to scan for satellite signals, determine satellite positions via trilateration, and provide satellite tracking data and payload/housekeeping data reception to satellite owners. This approach aims to provide a lower-cost alternative to traditional ground station networks for small satellite missions with limited budgets. The document provides details on the proposed DGSN system architecture, positioning methods using GPS time synchronization, and compares it to existing ground station networks.
!~+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUD...
Distributed Ground Station Network @ IAC-13 (paper)
1. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
IAC-13,B4,3,11,x17101
DISTRIBUTED GROUND STATION NETWORK - A GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR TRACKING AND
COMMUNICATION WITH SMALL SATELLITES AS AN OPEN SERVICE
Mr. Andreas Hornig
University of Stuttgart, Germany, andreas.hornig@aerospaceresearch.net
Mr. Timm Eversmeyer
Germany, timm@hgg.aero
Mr. Ulrich Beyermann
University of Stuttgart, Germany, beyermann@irs.uni-stuttgart.de
Small satellite missions face two special challenges due to limited financial budgets. The first is tracking the
satellite for orbit determination after orbit injection. The orbit can vary from the specified orbit when the satellite will
be launched as secondary or parasitic payload. In case of unknown orbit parameters high-gain antennas cannot be
pointed towards the satellite and establish the first connection needed for satellite activation. The second challenge is
to transmit all housekeeping and scientific data to mission operations via a limited number of ground-stations.
The Distributed Ground Station Network (DGSN) solution can solve the problem with permanent tracking and a
faster orbital element provision to the satellite owners. And it can provide permanent reception of satellite signals
with its data-dump mode in between main ground-stations provided by the satellite owner. The key feature is the
network of small ground-stations placed globally connected via the internet and performing an automatic scan of
satellite (and other beacon) signals, storing and sending them back to a central server, where they can be accessed by
the satellite owner. With a correlation of the beacon signal and GNSS synched ground-station time the satellite
position is determined with pseudo-ranging trilateration.
In contrast to ground-station time sharing concepts of Radio Aurora Explorer (SRI International in California and
University of Michigan), AISat (DLR) and QB50-GENSO (Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics) that rely on a
limited number of amateur radio operators and expensive hardware with limited availability DGSN uses an
innovative citizen science approach. The participatory aspect includes the deployment of ground-station hardware
and acquisition of satellite signal data but also the open-source hardware. In this way a high number of built sensornodes can be achieved and it also creates a new market for selling ready ground-stations.
The network owners an open-platform for every small satellite operator with a faster access to tracking data than
the update period by NORAD or ESTRACK with less running costs. The low data-rate reception is compensated by
the global and permanent coverage. DGSN will offer the orbital parameters of the received satellite signal under a
free license.
The feasibility study had been conducted as part of Azorean observing VERDE Sat during the Small Satellite
Project at the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of Stuttgart and DGSN is in the prototyping and
testing phase of the ground-stations.
I. INTRODUCTION
For small satellites that will be launched as
secondary or parasitic payloads the injected orbit can
vary from the specified one. This is due to the fact that
the main payload launched with the same launching
system sets the main target orbit and the launching
system is programmed to achieve this orbit with high
accuracy and the parasitic payload's orbit can be
influenced and thus be slightly changed. This change in
orbit has to be known by the small satellite owner to be
able to establish a communication link. When the orbital
elements differ high gain antennas cannot be pointed to
the satellite and miss the target's on-board antenna.
Therefor a relatively fast tracking and positioning of the
satellite is required.
Setting up an own tracking system with multi
ground stations is costly and most often not suitable for
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
small satellite owners like universities. The utilization
of using external databases of satellite ephemerides by
NORAD and ESTRACK is a challenge for the satellite
mission planning because the databases are updated on a
regular basis sometimes not matching the launch time.
A second aspect is the network of possible ground
stations that can be used for telemetry and control of
such small satellites. A permanent coverage of satellite
signal reception is costly or requires partnerships with
commercial stations or with the amateur radio
community.
II. PROPOSED NETWORK SOLUTION
The financial and planning tasks are one of the main
challenges for the VERDE sat (VEgetation Research
and DEtection) during the Small Satellite Project [1] at
the Institute of Space Systems (IRS) of the University of
Page 1 of 11
2. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
Stuttgart. The mission objective is to observe the
indigenous and exotic vegetation on the Azore islands
with a small satellite. This satellite budget is 5 M€, it is
booked for a launch with the Indian GSLV launcher
system and it has access to two primary ground stations
at the IRS and on the campus of the University of the
Azores, São Miguel. The secondary launch option into a
sun synchronous orbit (575 km height) with an
uncertainty of the provided orbital element in
combination with the high-gain antennas and limited
access times to the primary ground stations resulted in
the concept of the DGSN. It was designed to provide a
simple and cost efficient tracking system with respect to
on-board satellite hardware as well as the ground
segment.
The allocation of amateur radio bands for the highspeed payload data and the TT&C channels also
requires including the ham-radio community into
satellite mission to be allowed to use the bands. With
low-cost ground station hardware not only the hamradio community but also the participatory ordinary
citizen can be part in a grass-roots space program. In
this way a huge basis of only-receiving ground stations
can be deployed forming a global grid of distributed
ground stations via the internet. This network can be
used for tracking satellite signals, it gives the
opportunity of globally collecting satellite housekeeping
and even payload data, and it also includes the public
and brings space research to the front gardens as well as
balconies of the everyman. So it offers a synergy
between the satellite owner and providing a fast and
permanent communication and tracking service and it
directly involves the citizen with an active and
important part within a satellite mission.
The implementation of the beacon hardware onboard of the satellite is minimal, because it uses the
existing communication payload so the DGSN system
was chosen as the mandatory secondary science payload
of VERDE. Additional missions like the FlyingLaptop,
the flagship mission of the Small Satellite Project at the
IRS [1], the ArduSat [2] cube sat by nanosatisfi and the
FREDE [3] experiment, on-board the high-altitude
balloon mission BEXUS, applied for candidates.
As one result of the study the DGS-network is
designed as an open service for further satellites using
the network. The concept even proceeds existing
concepts by including everyone and not only the
professional or ham-radio community, where ham
licenses are required. The participation as a node of the
reception grid is also simplified by an open-source
approach of the ground station hardware. So interested
users can either buy a starter kit or build their own
station. This also allows a creative utilization of the
concept and spawns further sensor ideas by adding
modules for further tasks like GPS signal measuring
similar to EGNOS, adding further antennas and thus
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
frequency ranges or completely new applications due to
lateral thinking.
III. DISTRIBUTED GROUND STATION
NETWORK
The distributed ground station network (DGSN)
solution can solve the problem with permanent tracking
and a faster orbital element provision to the satellite
owners.
And it can provide permanent reception of satellite
signals with its data-dump mode in between main
ground stations provided by the satellite owner. In this
way it reduces black-out times and provides the
advantage of a low data-rate, but constant and
permanent reception globally. This is essential for small
projects with limited budget and the DGSN can provide
a service these parties do not have to build and operate
by themselves and it can provide some kind of standard
for an open use.
III.I DGSN Architecture
The DGSN architecture is divided in space, ground
and network segments (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1: Tracking and communication sequence (a-d)
The key feature is the network of small ground
stations placed globally connected via the internet and
performing an automatic scan for satellite (and other
beacon) signals, storing and sending them back to a
central server, where they can be accessed by the
satellite owner. This is part of the ground segment.
The network segment, formed by ground stations on
multiple locations and connected via the Internet, makes
Page 2 of 11
3. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
it possible to track them with trilateration, but it needs a
precise system time to correlate the received signals
with the reception time. That can be done with global
navigation satellite systems (GNSS) like GPS, Galileo
and others, So each ground station will be equipped
with a GNSS receiver that also determines the stations'
locations.
The ground station will be connected to a standard
personal computer with internet access. An open-source
software called BOINC (Berkeley Open Interface for
Network Computing) will be used to attach the PC to
the Constellation Platform [4], from where the
communication application will be loaded. Afterwards
the PC will automatically perform the needed signal
scanning with the connected ground station hardware.
The received data will be sent to the central
Constellation server where it will processed. And
another feature is signal processing and processing other
numerical tasks on the PCs connected to ground
stations. In this way also computing capacity for a
distributed computing system is provided. The
Constellation Platform is already available for this
application.
The ground station coverage relies on communities
ranging from the owner itself, amateur radio operators
and volunteers, for this scenario the ground station
hardware has to be simple and cheap, and the first
ground station version will be used for passive signal
reception. That means that it will only receive signals
for tracking and data dumping, but not for signal
transmission from ground station to the satellite. This is
due to operator licensing and because of safety reasons
for commanding signals. So the DGSN is an expansion
of the current communication and tracking system and
offers a niche especially for small satellites.
The network segment is also designed to work
without a central server in the internet in a 5+ ground
station mode and only connected on a local area or even
without connection by thus storing all the received
signals for later processing. This will allow a usage in
the fields for tests and not public endeavours.
The space segment includes satellites but is not
limited to this use. The required beacon signal can be
transmitted from other vessels like high altitude
balloons, flight drones or cars as well.
The required beacon signal can be either transmitted
by another hardware we offer or by just using the
required parameters for transmission and identification
signal to be used by the ground station system. So we
provide both, the hardware and the standard.
III.II DGSN Stations
Ground stations devices are small modular systems
to be either connected to a personal computer or as
standalone devices. The device will include the basic
unit that will use GNSS receivers to receive GNSS time
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
signals that will be either used to locate the stations
position and to correlate the measured data with a high
precision time source.
The measuring infrastructure will allow modules to
be plugged into the system and the first application will
be the beacon signal receiver, but more measurements
modules can be plugged in for various sensoric
purposes.
In addition to the beacon signal receiver module, the
antenna periphery can be attached. The on-board data
handling and network communication unit will handle
the data traffic in the ground station and allows
connecting an internal storage unit or a connection to an
external computer. DGSN concept is divided in space,
ground and network segments.
IV. EXISTING GROUND STATION NETWORKS
DGSN uses a new participatory approach and covers
a niche that is not covered by existing ground stations
networks.
For tracking satellites NORAD (North American
Aerospace Defense Command) offers Two-line element
set (TLE) of satellites and space vehicles. NORAD uses
active and passive tracking methods and regularly
updates the public TLE data-base.
The Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning
Integrated by Satellite (DORIS) by the French Space
Agency (CNES) uses beacon signals by satellites for
positioning. A beacon signal is send out by ground
stations and the frequency shift that occurs due to the
high relative velocity is processed on-board the satellite.
By the observation the satellite orbit, ground positions
and other parameters can be derived. 50-60 stations are
distributed over the Earth. These stations only emit
signals but do not receive signals. On the one hand the
installation of stations only requires electricity and the
positioning can be processed by the satellite, on the
other hand no payload data can be collected thus now
position data is sent to the owner via the network.
Furthermore it requires a reception of a bi-frequency 0.4
GHz and 2 GHz signal and additional processing power
for the positioning. This is an additional challenge for
small and smaller satellites.
A combination of tracking and communication is
provided by the Deep Space Network (DSN, NASA)
and the European Space Tracking (ESTRACK, ESA)
network. Both networks are set up by three ground
stations with deep space antennas (35m diameter)
providing a hemispherical signal propagation and
reception. In addition to the main stations additional
ground stations for communication with lower orbits
(15m diameter antennas) are used. DSN is mainly used
for missions beyond 16.000 km height. In this altitude
the satellite is always in view of one of the three main
DSN ground station antennas. For missions in lower
orbits other NASA ground stations or the tracking and
Page 3 of 11
4. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
data relay satellites (TDRS) are used. A similar
approach is used by ESTRACK. DSN and ESTRACK
are services are beyond budgets of small satellites.
For university and amateur radio satellites the
Global Educational Network for Satellite Operations
(GENSO) [5] was started. GENSO is a worldwide
network of ground stations that are connected via the
internet. The stations can be actively controlled via a
main server by an operator. During this phase each
ground station will grant control access and will
remotely communicate to the satellite if it is in view.
Due to the active communication to the satellite the
network is composed of only the amateur radio
community because operational licensing is required.
The satellite mission operator requests communication
time via GENSO’s Authentication Server (AUS) and
will get access to the network and can remote control
each Ground Station Server (GSS) and the motorized
antennas via the Mission Control Client (MCC). There
are currently 25 ground stations inside the GENSO
network. This is a time sharing approach by existing
semi-professional ground stations offering an efficient
usage of the stations. This method offers synergetic
effects to each member of the community due to the fact
that during the time the own satellite is out-of-view for
communication another member is allowed to use the
own station for their mission (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2: Comparison between DGSN and GENSO
network topology. No RX/TX for DGSN
participants, only via mission control terminal.
V. POSITIONING
The main task of the DGSN is the tracking of
beacon signals of satellites. This only requires low datarate and a regular emission of the signal for obtaining
the orbital parameters. Trilateration is used which
allows pseudo-ranging the signal’s origin position.
V.I GNSS Relation
Each ground station is equipped with GNSS
modules. GNS-services like GPS and Galileo provides
an independent and high accuracy time source that is
globally available. This is used for the station’s system
clocks. Furthermore GNSS can also automatically
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
provide the ground station location that with minimum
manual set-up to make it user-friendly and to allow
higher accuracy measurements.
The ground station location is used to determine all
station positions in the DGSN. The time source is used
to be correlated with the satellite beacon signal when
received. The same signal received at minimum five
stations can be used to trilaterate the signals origin
position. In this way the beacon and thus the satellite
can be tracked and with a global network of many more
ground station will allow it to permanently track it.
All in all a global available and precise time source
is essential and this can be only provided with GNSS.
This gives the opportunity to use the ground station
hardware as part of an internet connected sensor grid
with thousands of sensor nodes, or even without as a 5
node sensor grid storing on internal memory units.
V.II Trilateration
The first phase of DGSN stations will use
trilateration for determination of the signal’s original
location. This is due to the fact to use a simple and
proven method for positioning. Furthermore it allows a
simpler design of the ground station and antennas.
Additional features like frequency and phase shift
measurement will be updated by software and due to the
modular base design of the hardware. As an opensource project the application of this method is
licensing-free and also allows modification by the
community.
DGSN implements a “reverse-GPS” determination
of position. Instead of sending out signals from satellites
with known orbital positions and calculating the
unknown position of the GNSS receiver, a beacon
signal with a unique time-stamp from an unknown
position is send out and received at ground stations with
known positions. The advantage of pseudoranging is
applied so that accuracy errors in the measured
reception time at each ground station can be determined.
Due to offset of the satellite’s clock, atmospheric effects
on the signal propagation path, errors in global time
synchronization of the stations or the stations system
delays, variations in the reception time occurs. So the
satellite’s clock cannot be trusted and by using
pseudoranging the beacon’s position and the time error
can be computed accurately.
This is based on the satellite’s time-stamp sent with
the beacon signal and marking the send-out time and the
reception time at the ground station. The signal path
length is obtained by multiplying the speed of light by
the time the signal has taken from the beacon to the
receiving ground station. By using four stations the
problem of accuracy errors will be transferred to spheres
with the diameter of the computed paths. The location
of the beacon signal is expected to be on each sphere’s
surface and the three-dimensional coordinates can be
Page 4 of 11
5. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
computed with four spheres under the premise of
elimination of one of the two results. By using five
stations the position can be determined explicitly.
100 km on Earth’s surface, variations in station system
delays between 16 ms and 100 ms and the location
(x,y,z) of the beacon origin in this area and up to
altitudes of 1000 km were generated. With this the
reception times at each ground stations is computed on
basis of the propagation paths from the beacon location
to each ground stations. The number of stations ranged
from 5 to 15.
Fig. 3: Trilateration in 2D plane with 3 circles (P1-3)
resulting in beacon circle B with radius rB due to
time error. A solution for this problem was firstly
posed by Apollonius of Perga (262 BC – 190 BC)
In case of errors in the time-accuracy the position of
the beacon signal does not lie on the surface of all
spheres but instead in the center of an additional sphere
that is tangent to all other spheres. The radius of this
sphere is the average time error of the position system.
The 3D-positioning is preceded by solving a set of
four linear equations for four ground stations or 5 linear
equations for 5 stations. The last option eliminates the
false solution by using four equations for four
unknowns (determined system).
[1]
By using additional ground stations and thus spheres
the system of linear equation is overdetermined. This is
used for smoothing time-error effects on the calculation
by either using a method for directly solving the
overdetermined system or by reducing the calculation to
a determined system and computing a set of ground
stations by means of variations and combinatorial
methods.
V.III Positioning Software
The “Lone Pseudoranger” software was developed
and includes both methods. The behaviour of the
algorithms was tested with a set of randomized input
parameters generated by a Monte Carlo method. The
locations (x,y,z) of ground stations within a 100 km x
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
Fig. 4: Lone Pseudoranger with mode 0 (top) and mode
1 (bottom)
The behaviour of the determined system mode
(mode 0) with four stations identifies that an additional
determination methods needed to be included to
distinguish between the two correct results of the
quadratic function of the system of linear sphere
equations. Because only four stations are used these can
be combinatorial varied on the base of 15 stations. Even
though each iteration will result in one result that is faroff the original beacon, the other one is assumed to be
near to it. This condition can be used for filtering and
cluster resulting positions that are in close proximity
and filtering-out half of all results that are highly
distributed.
The behaviour of the overdetermined system mode
(mode 1) was applied to all 15 stations. It only results in
a single solution for the beacon position. The algorithm
is faster but is very sensitive to variation in internal
system delays due to the hardware. As an open-source
project
the
user
could
integrate
different
microcontrollers and processors which results in
different signal processing times and overall delay. With
a delay range between typical values of 16 ms and 100
Page 5 of 11
6. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
ms the computed position are closer to the beacon origin
when all station delays are the same. With a high
distribution between minimum and maximum delays the
computed position is further away. This is the result of
solving all 15 equations with one overdetermined
system of linear equation. If one or two stations inject
different delay times in a system with equal delay times,
the error is applied in an averaged way resulting in
higher position differences. As a solution a
overdetermined system is used to benefit by single
solutions but with less stations than available. The
remaining stations allow a combinatorial computation
resulting in a set of positions. A filter detects the
position with the furthest distance to the main cluster.
V.IV Clustering
Clustering the computed positions is one benefit of
the distributed ground station network because there are
more stations available then needed for trilateration.
Lone Pseudoranger uses a simple sorting algorithm. The
positions are computed by trilateration. If there are more
than five stations and thus computed beacon position
distances from each point to every other point is
calculated. The next steps search inside the matrix of
distances and assign the connection to the
corresponding points from the shortest to the longest
distance until each point is connected to at least one
other position (Fig. 5). The next step includes a graph
check whether all points are connected to each other or
if there are clusters. If there are more than one cluster
the cluster with most positions are determined. It is
assumed that the cluster with the most position points is
near to the real position and the final result is the
geometric center of this cluster (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6: Allocation of computed positions by clustering
V.V Numerical Results
The results of the randomized inputs showed four
behaviours of the computed position (Fig. 7).
1) When the ground stations are located and only the
beacon position is changed, then the higher the altitude
of the beacon is, the smaller the field-of-view angle will
be and the higher the inaccuracy dR. So for
determination of satellites in different orbits, each orbits
requires an adapted distribution density of ground
stations.
2) When all ground stations system delay times are
equal the highest accuracy is reached. This is
independently of the value (16 ms to 100 ms) because
the time-error is computed. In case each delay time is
different the position accuracy decreases. This is an
important fact for the open-source ground-station
design. This can be respected by measured system delay
times that are also included in time correction.
3) The number of ground stations receiving the same
beacon signal shall be high. There was no obvious trend
of converging to the minimum distance to the real value
by increasing numbers of stations. The distribution of
stations has a big influence on the accuracy and thus the
number of stations.
4) Mode 1 showed to obtain better results than mode
0 with few ground station numbers (5 < stations < 10).
With station numbers ≥10 the accuracy of mode 0
increases to the range of mode 1. So a combination of
both modes with variable station numbers in the system
of linear equations is applied as an additional position
evaluation.
Fig. 5: Basic steps of clustering algorithm
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
Page 6 of 11
7. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
VII.I Frequency Allocation
The selected frequency ranges are amateur radio
bands. This is required to open DGSN for everybody,
including the amateur radio community. The candidate
bands for DGSN are 70 cm, 23 cm and 13 cm bands
(0.42, 1.24, 2.4 GHz). The 13 cm band is a popular band
for small satellites and is also used by VERDE and
FlyingLaptop.
VI. GLOBAL DATA DUMP COMMUNICATION
The global reception of beacon signals also offers
the opportunity of receiving housekeeping payload data.
With the simple antenna design of phase 1 only low
data-rates of >2 kbit/s are set. This is adequate for
essential data with high priority (Table 1).
VERDE
Data-Rate
Contact
Data
High-Data
1200 kbit/s 10 min
90 Mbyte
Beacon
2 kbit/s
100 min
1.5 Mbyte
Table 1: VERDE sat communication links from 575 km
SSO (100 minutes orbit). High-data rate in 13 cm
band, Constellation in 23 cm band.
The data-rate is due to omnidirectional antennas. For
simplicity no motorized high-gain antennas are used.
This is an option for later updates of DGSN.
Furthermore the data-dump mode is a one way
communication. The ground stations will only receive
the data package and send it to the central server via the
internet. The satellite owner accesses the data on the
server and check for integrity. Missing or damaged
packages will be ordered to be resend via the satellite
owner’s main communication terminals. The satellite
will then resend these packages as ordered via the
DGSN.
VII. GROUND STATION CONSIDERATIONS
Regulations
The main regulation will be amateur radio licensing.
DGSN is a participatory project and it is open for
everybody. This requires that the ground stations do not
emit signals. So the ground stations in phase 0 will only
include “listening” mode and can only receive signals
and will forward it to the central server.
For a later phase and for authorized users, ground
stations could also be used for two way
communications.
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
[2]
The propagation path S is adapted according to the
elevation angle and longer distances to the satellite in
orbit. The main influence is the system noise. It is
higher for the 70 cm band resulting in bigger system
margins of higher frequency in 13 cm band (221 K @
0.4 GHz, 135 K @ 2-12 GHz). By using the elevation
angle the solid angle of the propagation cone can be
determined. The maximum cone angle is reached when
the system margin drops below 4 dB (Fig. 8).
2.4GHz@
16,0
0.5kbit/s
1.2GHz@
12,0
0.5kbit/s
0.4GHz@
0.5kbit/s
8,0
2.4GHz@
1kbit/s
1.2GHz@
4,0
1kbit/s
0.4GHz@
0,0
1kbit/s
0
30
60
90
2.4GHz@
2kbit/s
-4,0
1.2GHz@
2kbit/s
-8,0
0.4GHz@
elevation angle [°]
2kbit/s
system margin [dB]
Fig. 7: Trilateration accuracy over ground station
number. The accuracy is presented as the difference
between computed and real beacon position.
VII.II Station Density
The radio link budgets for up and downlinks are
modelled after “Space Mission Analysis and Design” by
W. J. Larson and J. R. Wertz [6] [7].
Fig. 8: System margin over elevation angle. Graph
shows the system margin for links with 70, 23, 13
cm bands with 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 kbit/s in correlation
to the elevation. The signal path length to VERDE in
575 km varies according to elevation angle.
The angle defines the chain of ground stations that is
required for a full coverage of 360° on the equator
(longitude). By expanding to the latitude direction the
overall number of stations is obtained. However the
stations will be deployed on land the density of stations
increases.
The number of ground stations of 365 for a beacon
link with 2 kbit/s in 2.4 GHz is expected to be realistic
Page 7 of 11
8. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
(Fig. 9). For later phases the data-rate shall be increased.
And even though the data-rate is low compared to other
shared infrastructure concepts, it allows the
simultaneous usage of different satellite operators. In
those concepts the contact area is wider than those of
the DGSN stations. This also means that if an operated
allocates a ground station server this station is blocked,
no other operator can use it, and there is a high chance
of the satellite flying by in exactly this grid section.
With DGSN there are more nodes and it increases the
number of simultaneously received satellites. In this
way the effective data-rate of all traffic also increases.
1000
800
600
400
200
0
1013
network and only process the demanded data of a
demanded satellite. The processing and tracking is
possible with the id but it requires additional steps.
The beacon signal frame also allows the satellite
owner to use the optional part of the frame for data that
is not required for tracking. This is the case for the datadump mode. The package size should allow to be
broadcasted and receivable with low system margin and
should respect the current weather situation. This data
could be further data for the use of tracking correction
like IMU position data for correlation with the
computed values or frequency and phase information of
the transmitter. And finally the payload data for the
global dump mode is included. The satellite operator is
completely free to transmit data in this optional frame
segment.
613
72 98 128 145 221 288 365
Fig. 10: Beacon signal example frame
Fig. 9: Number of deployed station for global coverage.
VIII. BEACON AND GROUND STATION
ARCHITECTURE
VIII.I Beacon
For the first phase of DGSN the beacon signal is a
simple digital stream and alternatives like pseudorandom codes and more advanced concepts for real-time
reception are proposed for later updates.
The signal itself is a periodically transmitted frame
and is splitted in a mandatory section containing the
essential starting marker, unique event and satellite id,
and the optional part where additional payload data and
tracking correction data can be transmitted (Fig. 10).
The mandatory part starts with a marker for
addressing the following frame and it can be used for
synchronization. Additionally the marker can be used
for time correlation at the ground station.
After that a unique event is allocated. This unique
event is required for the detection of the same event at
different locations received at different times. If the
repetition of frame without a unique event is to fast the
received signal event is not distinguishable and
accuracy of detection is decreased or not possible. The
unique event can be satellite data, a random number, or
a time-code. The last option allows detection of clock
offsets and errors. And the first option increases usage
of the bandwidth.
The satellite id is required for the following signal
pre- and processing to filter all received data in the
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
VIII.II Ground Station
The DGSN concept is based on time correlation
provided by a GNSS source (currently GPS, later
Galileo and Glonass) with an event signal (Fig. 11).
This event can be a satellite beacon or any other beacon
with the beacon signal protocol or others (ADS-B, etc.).
For a flexible use of time source and even event signals
the ground station concept is modular allowing the user
to expand and use the DGSN modules as a basis and
any other compatible module. The received signal is
processed in the receiver modules and transferred to the
bus connector. The event data is than correlated with the
received time by the time source board both are
collected by the data collector and finally transferred to
the ground station server of the participants operating
the node. Then the data is submitted via the internet to
the central Constellation server.
Fig. 11: Allocation of computed positions by clustering
Page 8 of 11
9. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
The basic DGSN ground station is equipped with a
satellite event receiver (SER) and the time board (TB)
(Fig, 12). At first the time board is activated via the data
bus triggering a microcontroller to supervise and
configure the GPS module. The GPS module delivers
the location of the ground station and then provides the
one pulse per second (1PPS) time signal to the PhaseLocked Loop / Direct Digital Synthesizer (PLL/DDS).
The PPL/DDS synchronizes to the 1PPS and multiplies
the frequency with a stable and higher frequency (e.g.
10 MHz)- Both signals are transferred to the latched
counter that calculates the current system time based on
the 1PPS GPS time and increases the accuracy by using
PLL time for counting the intermediate time steps
between two 1PPS signals. The system time is then
constantly buffered in the latched counter block.
Fig. 13: Proposed test configuration of five mobile
ground stations for ESRANGE. The open-source
approach allows application outside DGSN and is
discussed to be used for FREDE experiment on
BEXUS high altitude balloon flight.
Fig. 12: Example of setup with a high precision time
source and measurement for ground station
The satellite beacon signal is received and injected
into the bus-connector. The event signal is detected and
the latched signal triggers the read-out of the latched
counter. The currently buffered latched time count value
is injected into the bus-connector and both signals are
correlated and transferred to the data-collector. For this
the time board hast to permanently hold available the
updated latched counter to be prepared for
instantaneously providing the event time when the event
signal is detected.
VIII.III Configuration
The beacon and ground station configuration is
designed to function with and without network
connection. The principle of five stations for tracking
beacon signals can be used in the DGSN project but also
on the fields for mobile and remote experiments like on
ESA ESRANGE, Sweden (Fig. 13). The “fast
deployable antenna” concept is applied where the data is
stored on ground station on-board memory that needs to
be collected and analysed after the experiments
activities.
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
IX. NETWORK SEGMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
The open-source approach allows free reproducing
and utilization of the hardware and the user can also setup their own network. For DGSN the Constellation
platform is used for the open tracking and
communication service.
IX.I Constellation Distributed Computing Platform
Constellation is a distributed computing supercomputer. More than 7000 volunteers share their idle
PC time at home and for a virtual super computer via
the internet (Table 2). Constellation has been active
since 2011 and their users solve numerical aerospace
problems. On each of their computer the BOINC
(Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing)
is installed. It can be attached to various citizen science
projects and computing their workunits.
Constellation’s user basis is spread worldwide and
shall serve as nodes for ground stations. The average
user shares their computing capacity for five hours per
day as BOINC runs in the background. It is expected to
motivate 5 % of the user base to participate in DGSN
and buying a ground station kit or assembling
components. The ground station is designed to be
installed easily and the omnidirectional antenna allows
deployment in various environments (windows,
balconies, front gardens).
Page 9 of 11
10. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
Users Countries TeraFLOPS
Constellation 7.848 108
3.957
Table 2: Constellation Distributed Computing Grid. [8]
Right away Constellation offers computing capacity
for signal processing the received data as well as
determination of the two-line element set. The satellite
operator can receive final track products. Furthermore
the operator is performing outreach by actively
involving the public in the satellite mission. It can be
used to inform about the mission, to benefit from
developments (software and hardware) by the
community, providing synergies between the operator
and community and also for recruiting outstanding,
skilled users.
IX.II Active Distributed Sensoring Projects
Besides distributed computing there is also
distributed sensoring. For this the user only provides a
minimum computing capacity and shares the idle time
for sensoring with small devices plugged to the
computer. During this time sensor data is recorded and
also sent to the central server. In this way regional and
global maps are generated (Table 3).
RadioActive@home and Quake Catcher Network
are BOINC projects and using the client for sensor
operations and data-management. The first project
acquires data of environmental background radiation
and the second measures Earth quakes with three-axes
accelerometers. The Air Quality Egg and Blitzortung
community use special sensors and own software for
sensoring and data transfer. The prize of their hardware
is in range of the expected hardware cost per unit of
DGSN. So a community size of 400 is plausible.
Project
Nodes
Price/Unit
RadioActive@home[3]
386
37 €
Air Quality Egg [9]
650
100 €
Blitzortung.org [10]
749
200 €
Quake Catcher Network[3] 4397
35 €
DGSN
>400
200 € (est.)
Table 3: Citizen science projects with distributed
sensors. The number of nodes and price per sensor
unit is presented (28.Aug.2013) in correlation to the
expected DGSN nodes and estimated price per unit.
The main drivers of people participating in these
projects are a general interest in the specific field of
science and out of conviction to make a small but
important contribution for a project where everyone
benefits in everyday life. This can be transferred to
space applications and research offering an opportunity
for DGSN.
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
X. PERSPECTIVE
X.I Test Campaign
A first set of 5 prototypes will be built to be able to
track with trilateration ("reverse-GPS").
These stations will be equipped with modules for
ADS-B to test the trilateration software with aircraft
data system signals to use their transmitted position in
ADS-B for validation.
After those tests the beacon receiver module will be
tested to be able to receive our own beacon signals on
ground "fox hunt" tests and on high altitude balloons.
This will allow a stepwise approach to reception of
satellite beacon signals.
The last test phase will include a deployment of 50
post-prototype ground station devices in across Europe
to test the global coverage of beacon signals.
• ground (fox hunt)
• air (quadrocopter, ADS-B)
• high altitude (REXUS/BEXUS [11])
• space (small satellites, ArduSat, FLP)
X.II Target Group
The target group spreads among small, nano and
cube satellites owner. They are mainly operated by
universities and the radio amateur community. Those
groups have a need for global and cheap communication
links to their satellites and payloads and also rely on
positioning of their satellites. The access to the DGSN is
meant to be open for everyone to have a wide range of
possible users of the network. In this sector there is a
market for services to integrate the needed hardware and
software for their satellites. Another market sector is the
ground station hardware itself, which has to be built and
deployed. This relies on citizen scientists and a huge
basis of small and cheap devices.
The biggest market will be derivates from sensor
data and their derivates spawning into other sections
besides the telemetry and tracking of satellites. A global
sensor grid of ground stations could be used to measure
GNSS accuracy and serve as a basis to improve the
GNSS service itself (WAAS, EGNOS) [12]. The ground
station can be used for augmented-GPS on ground when
extended with transmission capacity. Tracking of
beacon signals can serve tracking from weather balloons
to skiers with functional clothing with build in beacons
in avalanche situations. Or just for mapping in
OpenStreetMap [13]. The generated data-basis has the
potential to spawn this extended uses and the hardware
can be extended and upgraded for more measurement
purposes.
The big satellite owners already use their own
infrastructures or pay a service like DORIS by CNES or
use other sources by NORAD and ESTRACK. The
DGSN concept can be an additional service for small
players and can set up the first privately operated
Page 10 of 11
11. 64th International Astronautical Congress, Beijing, China.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, 2013.
service provider for tracking and for small telemetry
reception.
X.III Open Access
The business case includes an open access strategy
and this includes a citizen science participation, a
standard setting and providing of hardware with later
derivates of services.
The DSGN must be open accessible for a broad
acceptance of clients and their needs. There is a need
and thus a market for global tracking and data reception
service for small satellites and other mobile targets. The
aim is to provide them with a service they need in
combination with participants, which have not been part
in space based operations before and thus creating a
community and thus a new small market. The satellite
owner gets what he wants, the citizen scientists can help
by voluntarily work and be credited and the hard- and
software segment can be pushed that increases sales.
And the additionally spawned services like an
additional, but private, satellite tracking services among
NORAD, DORIS & Co. and new services like
automated mapping for OpenStreetMap and creating
data sets for further research gives possibilities.
Potential customers are small satellite owners and
services, like universities or even the German
Aerospace Center DLR, where several small satellite
projects are on their way and concepts for ground
station networks exists (but not to such an extent and as
an closed environment solution).
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Fig. 14: small satellites interested in DGSN
To name a few small satellite projects with their own
solution for ground station networks
• nano and small satellites by universities (RAX,
AISat, FlyingLaptop)
• satellite constellations and swarms (QB50 &
GENSO)
• re-entry vessels (MIRKA 2)
• high altitude experiments (REXUS/BEXUS)
• balloons (weather balloons, BEXUS, FREDE
experiment)
• planes and drones (ADS-B, Stuttgarter Adler)
• sensoring platform (thunderstorm-, flash-,
nuclear detonation detection)
• GNSS quality measuring (WAAS, EGNOS)
• safety of life (avalanche)
IAC-13-B4,3,11,x17101
[11]
[12]
[13]
IRS, University of Stuttgart, "Small
Satellite Project," [Online]. Available:
http://www.kleinsatelliten.de/.
nanosatisfy,
„ArduSat,“
[Online].
Available: https://ardusat.org.
"Project
FREDE - Freon Decay
Experiment,"
[Online].
Available:
http://www.wsag.pl/.
"Constellation Distributed Computing
Platform,"
[Online].
Available:
http://www.aerospaceresearch.net.
L. Mehnen, B. Preindl und S. Krinninger,
„The Potential of Ground Station Networks
like GENSO for Multi-Satellite Projects like
QB50,“ in IAC 2010, Prague, CZ, 2010.
Wertz, J. R.; Larson, W. J., Space Mission
Analysis
and
Design,
3rd
edition
(ISBN:1881883108), Mcgraw-Hill, 1999.
C. Nöldeke, Satellite Communications
(ISBN: 3869914017), Monsenstein und
Vannerdat, 2013.
BOINCstats, "Project stats info," [Online].
Available:
http://boincstats.com/en/stats/projectStatsInfo.
„AirQualityEgg - Environment Sensor,“
[Online]. Available: http://airqualityegg.com/.
Blitzortung.org, "Participants," [Online].
Available:
http://www.blitzortung.org/Webpages/index.ph
p?lang=en&page=4&subpage_0=10.
REXUS/BEXUS, "Rocket and Balloon
Experiments for University Students,"
[Online].
Available:
http://www.rexusbexus.net/.
T.
Feuerle,
GPSund
Ionosphärenmonitoring mit Low-Cost GPSEmpfängern (ISBN:9783928628549), TU
Braunschweig Campus Forschungsflughafen.
OpenStreetMap, „The Free Wiki World
Map,“
[Online].
Available:
http://www.openstreetmap.org.
Page 11 of 11