Seminar [ES] Beyond Budgeting: La Revolución del Desempeño - 1-day seminar wi...
Ähnlich wie Agileee 2013: Bjarte Bogsnes "Beyond Budgeting – a management model for new business and people realities – the Statoil implementation journey"
What ISO Management Systems can learn from Balanced Scorecard?PECB
Ähnlich wie Agileee 2013: Bjarte Bogsnes "Beyond Budgeting – a management model for new business and people realities – the Statoil implementation journey" (20)
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
Agileee 2013: Bjarte Bogsnes "Beyond Budgeting – a management model for new business and people realities – the Statoil implementation journey"
1. Beyond Budgeting - a management model
for new business and people realities
Ambition to Action - the Statoil journey
Bjarte Bogsnes
Vice President - Performance Management Development
Chairman - Beyond Budgeting Roundtable Europe
2. Outline
• The case for change - what is the problem?
• The Beyond Budgeting principles
• The Statoil model - Ambition to action
-
3. Statoil in brief
• Turnover and market cap
approx. 90 bn. USD
Arctic
North Sea & Norwegian Sea
• 22000 employees
in 36 countries
Russia
• World’s largest operator in
waters deeper than 100 metres
• Second largest gas exporter to
Europe
Canada
Caspian
North Africa
US Gulf of Mexico
Middle East
• World leader of crude oil sales
• Listed in New York and Oslo
Aus/Indo.
South America
West Africa
East Africa
Current production of oil and gas
7. Which is most efficient?
Which is most difficult?
In which are values most important?
8. The world has changed what about the way we lead and manage?
Stable
Dynamic
Business
environment
Traditional
management
”Theory X”
8-
”Theory Y”
People
9. We must change both processes and leadership
Dynamic
Processes
Relative and directional goals
Dynamic forecasting and
resource allocation
Holistic performance evaluation
Stable
Rigid, detailed and annual
Rules-based micromanagement
Centralised command and
control
Secrecy, sticks and carrots
”Theory X”
Beyond Budgeting
Values based
Autonomy
Transparency
Internal motivation
”Theory Y”
Leadership
11. The Beyond Budgeting principles
Change in leadership
1. Values - Govern through a few clear values, goals and
boundaries, not detailed rules and budgets
7. Goals - Set relative goals for continuous improvement,
don’t negotiate fixed performance contracts
2. Performance - Create a high performance climate
based on relative success, not on meeting fixed targets
8. Rewards - Reward shared success based on relative
performance, not on meeting fixed targets
3. Transparency - Promote open information for self
management, don’t restrict it hierarchically
9. Planning - Make planning a continuous and inclusive
process, not a top-down annual event
4. Organization - Organize as a network of lean,
accountable teams, not around centralized functions
10. Coordination - Coordinate interactions dynamically,
not through annual planning cycles
5. Autonomy - Give teams the freedom and capability to
act; don’t micro-manage them
11. Resources - Make resources available as needed, not
through annual budget allocations
6. Customers - Focus everyone on improving customer
outcomes, not on hierarchical relationships
11 -
Change in processes
12. Controls - Base controls on relative indicators and
trends, not on variances against plan
12. Start of the Statoil journey
- solving a serious budget conflict
Step 1
The budget purposes
Step 2
Separate
Improve
Target
Budget =
•Target
•Forecast
•Resource allocation
What we want
to happen
Forecast
What we think
will happen
Resource
allocation
“Same number –
conflicting purposes”
12 -
”Different numbers”
• Inspiring & motivating
• Relative where possible
• Holistic performance evaluation
• Unbiased - expected outcome
• Limited detail
• Dynamic - no annual allocation
• KPI targets, mandates, decision
gates & decision criteria
• Trend monitoring
“Event driven
- not calendar driven”
14. The mindset required…..
– cost conscious from the first penny
Do I have a
budget for this?
Is this really
necessary?
What is good enough?
How much value is this
creating?
Budget
Not
OK
Is this within my execution
framework?
OK?
OK
OK?
OK?
OK?
OK?
15. …..and the tools available
Traditional
cost budget
Absolute KPIs
Detailed and
annual
Ambition level /
burn rate
Relative KPIs
Unit cost
input/output
Unit cost vs
peers
If no KPIs found
Bottom line
focus only
Strategic objectives
or actions only
Increasing
autonomy
and flexibility
Xx
Xx
Xx
”USD/bbl”
Xx
Xx
”USD/customer”
Xx
Xx
”USD/employee”
Xx
1003,4
~1000
”1. quartile”
”Better than
average”
EBIT
RoACE
(abs/rel)
” A simplified and cost
conscious way of
working”
“More video - less
travel ”
”Reduce down-time at
all our facilities”
Select based on what works best in your business
Monitoring of actual development, intervention if needed only
Increasing
need for
strong values
and clear
direction
16. Ambition to Action - purpose and process
• Translating strategy - from ambitions to actions
• Securing flexibility - room to act and perform
• Activating values and leadership principles
Strategic
objectives
KPIs
Actions &
forecasts
Individual or
team
goals
Where are we going
– what does success
look like?
How do we measure
progress?
How do we get
there?
What is my or our
contribution?
• Most important strategic
change areas
• Indicative measure of
strategic delivery
My Performance Goals
• Medium term horizon
• 5-10 KPIs, shorter/
longer term targets
• Concrete actions and
expected outcome
(forecast)
• Clear deadlines and
accountabilities
•Delivery
•Behaviour
17. Ambition to Action example
People &
Organisation
HSE
Operations
Market
Finance
Where are we
going?
”Strategic
objectives”
How do we
measure
progress?
”Key
Performance
Indicators”
How do
we get
there?
”Actions”
18. More than 1400 ”Ambition to Actions”
across the company
…..and more
21. A broader performance language
- from narrow measurement to a holistic assessment
Ambition to Action
Pressure testing KPI results:
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
50/50
• Development plan
• Rewards
Behaviour
• Deliver towards the strategic objectives?
• How ambitious KPI targets?
• Changed assumptions, with positive or
negative effect?
Living the values
• Agreed actions implemented, or corrective
actions initiated as needed?
• 360°/ 180°/ 90° surveys
• Delivered results sustainable?
• Day-to day-observations
• People survey
22. Towards a simpler, more dynamic and
self-regulating Ambition to Action process
More cost conscious
- less «cost cutting»
More event driven
- less calendar driven
More translation
- less cascading
More relative
- less absolute KPIs
More transparency
- less secrecy
Simple is not the same as easy!
23. Questions or comments - now or later?
Bjarte Bogsnes
bjbo@statoil.com
+ 47 916 13 843
Twitter @bbogsnes
Beyond Budgeting Round Table
www.bbrt.org
24. Want to hear more?
1.
The problems with traditional management
2.
The Beyond Budgeting model
3.
The Borealis case
4.
The Statoil case
5.
Implementation advice
Out on Wiley (US)
Available from e.g. Amazon.co.uk
(Now available in Russian and Japanese)
26. Key principles - Ambition to Action
Performance is
ultimately about
performing
better than
those we
compare
ourselves with
26 -
Do the right
thing in the
actual situation,
guided by the
Statoil Book,
your Ambition to
action, decision
criteria &
authorities and
sound business
judgement
Within this
framework,
resources are
made available
or allocated
case-by-case
Business follow
up is forward
looking and
action oriented
Performance
evaluation is a
holistic
assessment of
delivery and
behaviour
27. A target – what we want to happen
• Relative where possible
− Input/output or benchmarking
• Translation - not cascading
− Must all targets add up?
• Ambitious - without overstretching
− Remember Aristotle
• SMART*
− but not too SMART
*SMART: Specific, Measureable, Achievable, Realistic, Timebound
28. A forecast – what we think will happen
- whether we like what we see or not!
… not a promise,
not an application for resources
29. A forecast is a call to action
Get issues on the radar
screen early enough …
… to be able to take
corrective actions
Hinweis der Redaktion
We want a responsible, cost conscious and commercial organisation, where people ask different and better questions before making cost decisions
A budget “ceiling” is effective in keeping cost down, but also in keeping them up. The ceiling is also a “floor”, because one might get less next year if under-spending .
There is some flexibility during the year in a budget, but normally upwards only. Many ask for more money when assumptions change, few if any does the opposite…..
A detailed cost budget is also comfortable for managers who dislike uncertainty and decision making, because most decisions are already made by someone above (what to do and how much it shall cost).
So dynamic resource allocation is not necessarily “easier” for managers, but we believe its is much better.
Such a different mind-set is necessary, but not sufficient. We also need a set of tools to help us. These are explained on the next slide.
(Note: slide show !)
We have a number of alternative ways of managing other costs:
Manage against a total ambition level or “burn rate” “(in the range of 1000)”. This solves some, but not all of the budget problems, because we don’t always know up front if 1000 is exactly the right level.
This is solved by moving from absolute to relative KPIs; a unit cost target or comparing with others and set a ”league table” target.
If a unit has a profit target, this is an indirect way of managing cost . You can spend more if you earn even more (good cost)..
It is also possible to manage without costs KPIs, and address costs only through strategic objectives and/or actions.
Remember that we in a addition always monitor actual cost trends. If these reveal irresponsible spending, we have not abdicated the right to intervene . But we do this only when and where needed, and not for everybody like in a traditional budget.
Select from this ”menu” based on type of business and the actual situation in each unit. The further to the right, the higher the need for strong value s and a clear strategic direction.
Ambition to Action translates our strategy into
Strategic objectives – where are we going and what does success look like?
Key Performance Indicators – how do we measure progress?
Actions – how do we get there?
Individual or team goals – what is my or our contribution?
Remember that KPIs are indicators only, they are not always able to tell the whole truth. That is why we have a holistic performance evaluation, where we look at much more than only measurement.
Ambition to Action can and should be changed when needed, driven by events more than by the calendar. Big changes require approval, small changes require information only.
CFO Torgrim Reitan announces a new and longer term effort to build a stronger cost culture in Statoil.
The purpose is to achieve sustainable effects.
The strategy is to work on cost consciousness instead of running a traditional cost cutting program.
We have over the last years tried to make Ambition to Action even more relevant and useful for business teams across Statoil.
The goal is an even simpler, self-regulating and efficient process This means.
A more cost conscious culture - and less traditional cost cutting
A more event driven and a less calendar driven rhythm
More translation and less cascading
More relative and less absolute KPIs
In short, we want to give Ambition to Action back to the line!