Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Preparation of IPA II Action Documents
1. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
All presentations are available on the PPF5 website: www.ppf5.rs
2. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
to explain the core
content of IPA II
Action Document
to participate in
and contribute to the
process of
preparation of IPA II
Action Documents
3. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Candidate countries and potential candidate
countries are “Beneficiary countries” which have access
to assistance in all five “policy areas” (formerly
“components”);
Sector approach: almost complete shift from project-
based assistance to co-financing of agreed country
sector strategies;
Flexibility to re-allocate funds between policy areas
and/or countries;
Opportunity for broader usage of innovative
financial instruments. e.g. sector budget support;
And*...
4. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
IPA II Regulation / Rules of Application
Enlargement Package
(EU Enlargement Strategy, EC Progress Report /SAA/ European Partnership)
Country /Multi-Country Strategy Paper
National Sector Programme or (IPA-specific)
Sector Planning Document -SPD)
Action Documents (ADs)
(Draft) Action Programme (AP)
Financing Proposal
Commission
Implementing Decision
Financing Agreement
Annexed: ADs
Annexed: AP
5. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Country Strategy Paper/Multi – Country Strategy Paper:
the overreaching strategic planning documents - describe in
broad terms how Beneficiaries will use financial assistance to
address the political priorities of the Enlargement Strategy and
the reform efforts under different Sectors
Action Programme: A group of actions defined by clearly
identified objectives and expected results, as well as
implementation arrangements and other related conditions for
execution, adopted through a Commission implementing
Decision.
Action: A coherent set of coordinated activities carried out to
meet a defined objective, which have an estimated total cost plus
implementation schedule and performance parameters.
Activity: A component of an Action which can be clearly identified
by its costs and type of financing (procurement, grant etc.)
6. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
7. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Scope Underlying document –
implementation oriented - to be used
for the preparation of the Financing
Proposal.
Type Document of a working/operational
nature to be shared mainly between
the Republic of Serbia, the EU
Delegation and the Commission
Responsibili
ties
Preparation by the Republic of Serbia.
Supervision and quality control by the
EU Delegation and EC services
8. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
UNDERSTAND,
IDENTIFY
EXPLAIN,
ASSESS,
DEFINE,
STRUCTURE
ACTION
9. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Then provide Action
Rationale…
briefly describe the context -
key problems/needs which are
currently faced by the
Beneficiary Country and how
the Action will help resolve
these
identify the stakeholders
most affected by the problem
and
what institutional and
organisational issues should be
addressed
10. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Rationale…
Relevance with
the CSP priority(ies)the Action
addresses
priority(ies) of the Enlargement
Strategy(if relevant) ;
priorities of the Annual Progress
Report the Action will address;
the EU policies and any regional
strategy in line with the Action;
Multi-Country Strategy Paper (if
relevant);
other relevant actions or
strategies supported by the national
authorities and/or the donor
community.
11. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
•
Rationale…
Lessons learned
short description of
problems/issues encountered in
previous actions in the same
field and how they can be
avoided.
key recommendations and
follow-up of the relevant
evaluation(s)
Q for you: What key lessons
can be drawn for future
financial assistance?
12. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Rationale…
Sector Approach
Assessment
An overview of
Sector Maturity based on
main EC assessment criteria
13. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Work together with all
relevant stakeholders
Shift from stand-alone
projects to programmes
National policy process &
ownership
Increase the coherence
between policy, spending
and results, and reduce
transaction costs
14. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
1. National sector policies/ strategies
2. Institutional setting, leadership & capacity
3. Sector & donor coordination
4. Mid-term budgetary perspective
5. Monitoring & performance assessment
framework
6. Public finance management
7. Macro-economic framework
15. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
•
A summary of the sector approach assessment based on
EC criteria
In the case of AD, a summary of the sector
policy/context, even in the case of a Stand-alone
Action (if relevant), including any plan of the
Beneficiary Country to improve its capacity and move
towards a sector approach.
16. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
For a Sector Support Action an overview of the following
aspects:
description of any existing Country Sector Policy/Strategy and how
this translates into an IPA Action
any specific IPA SPD & the way how it was prepared;
institutional arrangements ,including lead ministry;
sector and donor coordination (i.e. very brief description of the
mechanisms for ensuring coordination between the government
institutions and between the government and donors/other
stakeholders);
Sector budget and medium term perspective (very concise)
Other aspects, i.e. performance management framework; Public
finance management system, may be added but should remain
very concise.
further details can be added as an annex.
17. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Analysis phase:
Preparatory analysis – situation analysis
Stakeholder analysis
Problem analysis Objective analysis
Strategy analysis
Planning phase:
Logical Framework Matrix
Activity scheduling
Resource scheduling
18. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
19. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
This comprises a more detailed analysis:
• Of the people, groups or organizations that may
influence or be influenced by the problem or a
potential solution to the problem.
• The objectives of this step are to identify and
discuss the interest and expectations of
persons and groups that are important to the
success of the intervention.
20. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Politicians (Values)
Technicians
(Solutions)
Recipients
(Problems)
21. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
POLITICIANS TECHNICIANS RECIPIENTS
PUBLIC
SPHERE
Government
Public
Administration
Local
Communities
PRIVATE
SPHERE Chambers
Consultants
and
researchers
SMEs
SOCIAL
SPHERE Trade Unions Universities CSOs
22. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Interests
Previous
experience
Questions of
authority
Pressure
at work
Priorities
Occupations
and relations
Personal
characteristics
Different stakehoders
perceive same changes
in different ways
23. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Stakeholder
and basic
characteristics
Interests and
how affected
by the
problem(s)
Capacity and
motivation to
bring about
change
Possible actions
to adsress
stakeholder
interests
24. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
25. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
26. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
SWOT is a method for conducting
situation analysis
Participatory approach
Subjective stands of the group
Facilitates problems and objectives
identification
27. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
SWOT
analysis
Internal
factors
Strengths Weaknesses
External
factors
Opportunities Threats
Identify S. W. O. T. , then analyze through
SWOT Matrix
strategic choices
28. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
INTERNAL
TRANSLATE INTO
ACTION PLAN
EXTERNAL
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
How do we use our
strengths to exploit
the opportunities?
How do we overcome
the weaknesses that
prevent us exploit the
opportunities?
THREATS
How do we use our
strengths to reduce
the likelihood and
impact of the threats?
How do we overcome
the weaknesses that
will make these threats
a reality?
29. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
INTERNAL
EXTERNAL
STRENGTH
•High % of young people
with higher education
WEAKNESSES
•High unemployment rate
of young population
OPPORTUNITIES
•Increase of young
labour force
S-O /Maxi- Maxi
strategy
Build on strengths
to exploit
opportunities
W-O /mini- Maxi
strategy
Minimise weaknesses
to exploit opportunities
THREATS
•Emigration of
skillful labour
force
S-T /Maxi –mini
strategy
Build on strengths in
order to fight off
threats
W-T/mini- mini
strategy
Minimise weaknesses
in order to fight off
threats
Invest on high education to
qualify young labour force
Invest on high education
to avoid brain-draining
Minimise unemployment to
exploit young labour force
Minimise unemployment to
avoid brain-draining
30. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
31. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Establishing the
roots of causes
in order to focus the
intervention design on them and
not solely to the
symptoms of problems!
32. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Process of identification of
negative aspects of some
existing situation and
establishment of
cause and effect relations
between identified
aspects / problems.
33. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Once identified, the stakeholder
group should meet and conduct a
facilitated discussion to further
identify and clearly state the
problems that need to be
resolved.
34. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Precise defining of framework and
object of analyses
Identification and formulation of the
problems
Selection of primary or focal
problem(s)
Problem tree development
35. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Only existing problems should be identified,
not potential ones, future ones nor imagined
ones
Problem is not absence of solution, but
existence of some negative state of affairs
On each paper you should write only one
problem
36. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Public transportation in Tac City
37. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Insufficient
maintenance of
busses
Bus Company losing trust of
the passengers
Increased traffic jams in
the city
Busses do not
arrive and leave on time
Passengers suffer
injuries or die
Frequent traffic
accidents
Bad quality of
roads
Bus Company is losing money
Busses are in bad
technical conditions
Busses are very old
Passengers use alternative
traffic means
Reckless driving of
bus drivers
Passengers arrive late
38. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Technique for establishing cause-effect
relations between problems and its
visualization
39. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Picture of existing negative state of
affairs
Effects
Central problem
Causes
40. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
1. Identification of primary or focal problem(s)
2. Identification of essential direct causes of
primary problem – first order causes
3. Identification of essential and direct effects
of primary problem – first order effects
4. Identification of second order causes and
effects, third order, etc.
5. Problem tree construction – drawing cause-
effect relations, bottom up
6. Problem tree review
41. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Effect
Focal problem
Cause Cause Cause
Cause Cause
Effect
Effect Effect
42. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Insufficient
maintenance
of busses
Busses are very old Bad quality of roads
Busses are in bad
technical conditions
Reckless driving of
bus drivers
Busses do not
arrive and leave on time
Passengers arrive late
Frequent traffic
accidents
Passengers suffer injuries or
die
Bus Company losing trust of the
passengers
Passengers use alternative
traffic means
Bus Company is loosing money Increased traffic jams in the
city
EFFECTS
CENTRAL
PROBLEM/S
CAUSES
43. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
44. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
45. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Process in which Problem tree is converted
into Objective/solution tree and analysis of
that product
PROBLEM TREE OBJECTIVE TREE
46. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Reformulate each problem in a “problem tree”
into a positive statement (objective)
Verify hierarchy of objectives
Visualization of relationships in a diagram
47. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Objective Tree
Overall objectives
Project Purpose
Results
Problem Tree
Effects
Focal problem
Causes
48. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Rural exodus
Low
productivity
High
unemployment
Low skilled
labour
Poor education
facilities
Outdated
technologies
Rural immigration
Higher
productivity
Lower
unemployment
Higher skilled
labour
Better education
facilities
Updated
technologies
.. Is caused by.. .. Will lead to...
49. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
1. Starting from the top reformulate all
elements of Problem tree into a
positive, desirable conditions
2. Instead of cause-effect relations in
Problem tree, established relations are
means-solution or means-objective
3. Starting from the bottom check
whether established means-objective
relations are logic and valid
50. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
4. If needed:
a) revise objective statements
b) erase solutions/objective which are
unrealistic or unnecessary
c) add new solutions/objectives where
necessary
5. connect with lines to show means-
solutions or means-objective
relationships
51. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Busses are well maintained Old busses are being
replaced
as needed
Good quality of roads
Busses are in good
technical condition
Drivers drive more
carefully
Busses arrive and leave in line with
schedule
Passengers arrive on time
Number of accidents
has decreased
Increased safety of the
passengers
Trust of the passengers regained
Increased number of people use public transport
Buss Company makes profit
Improved traffic situation in
the city centre
Overall
objective
Specific
objective(s)
Results
52. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
53. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Final step in ANALYSIS PHASE
Selection of strategy which will be used for
achieving desired objectives
Process of decision making on which
solutions (objectives) will be included in
project and which will stay outside of
project, as well as what is purpose/specific
objectives and what is overall objective
54. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
The objective tree usually depicts several
possible strategies that can comprise a
solution to each sub-problem and to the focal
problem.
Since there is usually a limit to the resources
that can be applied to the project, it is
necessary to examine these alternatives and
select the best one.
To do this, decision-makers will first need to
select criteria upon which they can base the
analysis.
55. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Which combinations will most probably
lead to desired results and sustainable
benefits?
Which is the best way to support the
ownership over the project,
including institutions/organizations
capacity development?
Which option is the most efficient one?
56. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Busses are well maintained Old busses are being
replaced
as needed
Good quality of roads
Busses are in good
technical condition
Drivers drive more
carefully
Busses arrive and leave in line with
schedule
Passengers arrive on time
Number of accidents
has decreased
Increased safety of the
passengers
Trust of the passengers regained
Increased number of people use public transport
Buss Company makes profit
Improved traffic situation in
the city centre
drivers
57. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
58. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
NAD /CSP SPD AD
Overall Objective
/Enlargement
Strategy
Priority /Target
Measure
Results
Results
Overall Objective
Specific
Objective
Overall Objective
Specific
Objective
59. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Sector Planning
Document
Action Document
Results
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
R8
Specific
Objective 1
Specific
Objective 2
Results
2015
R1
R2
2016
R3
R4
R5
R6
2017
R7
R8
60. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
61. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Overall
objective
(1)
Indicators
(8)
Sources of
verification
(9)
Specific
objective
(2)
Indicators
(10)
Sources of
verification
(11)
Assumptions
(7)
Results
(3)
Indicators
(12)
Sources of
verification
(13)
Assumptions
(6)
Activities
(4)
Implementation
Modalities
Costs Assumptions
(5)
62. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVI)represent the baseline
for measuring performance, monitoring operations and the overall
effectiveness of programme implementation.
Performance Indicators mainly OUTCOME indicators
at the level of Specific Objective
provide information on changes which occur for direct
beneficiaries
63. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
• Impact indicators - to be set at the level of the SPD overall
and specific objective and can be identified from CSR/NAD targets
• Outcome indicators measure the result performance and
provide information on changes which occur for direct
beneficiaries
- to be set at the level of AD specific objective;
• Output indicators- to be identified as the consequences of AD
activities carried out and their products and set at the level of
result
64. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
65. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Indicator Description Baseline
(year)
Target
(year)
CSP indicator (if
applicable)
Action outcome
indicator1
Action outcome
indicator2
Etc.
66. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
67. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
the main institutional stakeholders involved in the
management and implementation process of the Action
their respective roles and responsibilities (e.g. Line
Ministries, National Institutions/Agencies, Regional
Authorities, etc.)
as well as any coordination arrangements (working
group, steering committee, etc)
IMPLEMENTATION METHOD AND TYPE OF FINANCING
financing methods to deliver activities; i.e. indicative
number and types of tender(s)/call for
proposal(s)/grants, as well as, where available, the
method of implementation and any delegated partners
Co-financing arrangement
Explain…
68. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
IPA
Action
Document
SERVICES
SUPPLIES
WORKS
Terms of
Reference
Technical
Specifications
Bills of
Quantity
GRANTS Guidelines for
Applicants
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
69. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
SERVICES
>€300,000
International
restricted
procedure
< €300,000 but > €20,000
1.Framework contracts
2.Competitive negotiated
procedure
< €20,000
Single tender
SUPPLIES
> €300,000
International
open
procedure
<€300,000 but
> €100,000
Local open
procedure
<€100,000 but >
€20,000
Competitive
negotiated
procedure
< €20,000
Single tender
WORKS
>€5,000,000
1.Internation
al open
procedure
2.Internation
al restricted
procedure
<€ 5,000,000
but > €300,000
Local open
procedure
< € 300,000 but
> €20,000
Competitive
negotiated
procedure
< €20,000
Single tender
GRANTS >€2,000,000
International
call for
proposals
>€2,000,000
Local call for proposals
For any amount
in cases of
urgency
Direct grant
70. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Indicative Contracting Time
Contract
Type
Procurement
Procedure
Average
Time Taken
SERVICE International Restricted
Tender
(9)-12 months
Framework (3)-5 months
SUPPLIES International Open Tender 9 months
Local Open Tender 6 months
WORKS International Open Tender 12+ months
Local Open Tender 9-12 months
GRANTS International Call for
Proposals
12+ months
Local Call for Proposals (6)-9 months
71. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
SPD: Programming and Implementation Plan
SECTOR
TITLE
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Q3 Q4 Q1
Q
2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
ACTION 1
P C C C/I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Activity
1.1 P C C I I I I I I I I I I I I
Activity
1.2 P C C C C I I I I I I I I I I
…..
ACTION 2 P P P C C C C/I I I I I I I I I I I I
Activity
2.1 P P P C C C C I I I I I I I I I I I
Activity
2.2 P P P C C I I I I I I I I I I I I
P = programming (period when the IPA action programme is expected to be adopted
C = procurement and grant award procedure
I = implementation period
72. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
73. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
74. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Service contract is used for engagement of
experts for delivery of defined tasks
Costs cover expert fees
Budget is relatively simple – fees include
other costs (transport, per-diems)
75. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Budget is calculated in relation to type and number of
experts
Fees - usual cost: € 800-1000 for senior experts and €
250-400 for junior experts (it depends on expertise
and period of engagement, short-term or long-term)
Incidental expenditures (between 2 & 5, sometimes
10% of budget)
• Bank charges
• Per diems for experts when working outside normal
place of work
• Visibility events, translation etc.
Verification (e.g. around 2% of budget)
• External auditor’s fees
76. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Supply contract is used for purchase of
equipment
Contract covers equipment, including
installation, training, spare parts etc.
Experts estimation is necessary
It is necessary to take into account timeframe
(1,5 year to implementation)
77. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Value of the contract depends on the type and
quantity of equipment
Costs are totally depended on the type of
equipment (e.g. computer is around € 1,000)
78. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Works contract is used for construction and
reconstruction (infrastructure)
Contract covers all costs related to (re)
construction, including materials, workers,
engines etc.
Expert’s estimation is necessary
Precondition for implementation is prepared
technical documentation, existence of relevant
licenses etc.
79. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Value of the contract depends on type and
shape of (re) construction
Contingency reserve (6-15%) and supervision
of works
80. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Grants contract is used for the grant scheme
as direct donation for local and regional
authorities and civil society organizations
Budget composition: total value of the grant
scheme
81. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Represents transfer of knowledge and
experience from MS to CC and PCC
Budget composition: detailed breakdown in
line with twinning manual
Budget from practice:
– Twinning: 1-2 million euros
– Twinning light: 200.000 euro
82. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Direct Agreement between the EC and
institutions which have specific and unique
knowledge necessary for project
implementation (UNHCR, UNICEF, IFIs, IOM,
UNDP etc.)
Budget composition: there is no prescribe
form, but it should be presented in detail
(expert fees, sub-contracting, supplies etc.)
83. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE (AND IF RELEVANT
DISASTER RESILIENCE)
Q: How environmental considerations have been
integrated in the Action design” as well as how the 'Rio
marking' of the Action for climate change 'adaptation'
and 'mitigation' will be applied (if relevant)?
Q:Describe the measures related to disaster resilience
and risk prevention (if relevant)
ENGAGEMENT WITH CIVIL SOCIETY (AND IF RELEVANT,
OTHER NON-STATE STAKEHOLDERS)
Q: What measures have been taken to associate civil
society and/or social partners etc. in the design and
implementation of the Action?
84. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND GENDER MAINSTREAMING
Q: How does the Action take account of gender
aspects during design and implementation phases?
MINORITIES AND VULNERABLE GROUPS
Q: How does the Action take account of people
belonging to minorities/vulnerable groups?
Q: How their involvement is facilitated?
85. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
the Action should be sustainable beyond its
implementation period
Q: Define your commitment or describe required
resources (human and financial)provided for the
operation and maintenance of results once the
Action is completed
86. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic
of Serbia
European Integration Office
Details on any specific communication and visibility
activity/plan for the Action, including information on
target audiences (if relevant)
Useful tool (if required)-guidelines provided in the
Communication and Visibility Manual for EU External
Actions
87. Project funded by
The European Union
Government of the Republic of Serbia
European Integration Office
All presentations are available on the PPF5 website: www.ppf5.rs