2. 2
What is a “project”?
A project is a temporary, one-time activity
undertaken to create a unique product or
service, which is intended to bring about
beneficial change or added value.
3. 3
What is a “project”?
A project’s characteristic of being a temporary,
one-time event contrasts with processes or
operations, which are ongoing activities
intended to create the same product or service
over and over again.
4. 4
What is “project finance”?
Project finance is the financing of long-term
infrastructure and industrial projects based
upon a complex financial structure.
Both project debt and equity are used to finance
the project.
Debt is repaid using the cash flow generated by
operation of the project, rather than other
resources of the project owners.
5. 5
What is “project finance”?
Financing is typically secured by all project
assets, including any revenue-producing
contracts intended to be fulfilled by future
activities of the completed project.
Lenders are also given the right to assume
control of a project if the project company has
difficulties complying with loan terms.
6. 6
What is “project finance”?
Generally, a special purpose entity is created
for each project.
This shields other assets owned by a project
sponsor from failure of the project.
As a special purpose entity, the project
company has no assets other than the project
7. 7
What is “project finance
modeling”?
Project modeling is the development of
analytical models to assess the risk-reward,
cost-benefit or feasibility of a project.
Project finance modeling is the development of
analytical models to assess the risk-reward of
lending to or investing in a project.
8. 8
What is “project finance
modeling”?
All financial evaluations of a project depend
upon projections of expected future cash flows
generated by activities of the completed project.
Forecasting project cash flows requires a
thorough understanding of the methods,
techniques and computer software commonly
used in such projections.
9. 9
What is “project finance
modeling”?
The analytical challenge is to design financial
projection models that are:
– Thorough in scope
– Accurate and reliable
– Flexible in accommodating revisions
– Quick to develop and maintain
10. 10
Course Outline
Project lending: Credit considerations
Project investing: Measures of return
Lending or investing: Free cash flow
Modeling issues
Dealing with data
11. 11
Project Lending
Expected from owner before approval:
– Economic justification for project
Feasibility study
Cost – benefit analysis
– Demographics
– Assumptions
– Projections
– IRR, NPV, etc.
– Identified risks
12. 12
Project Lending
Expected from owner before approval:
– Detailed cash flows
– Detailed project time schedule
Together, cash flows and time schedule dictate
borrowing and repayment schedule
13. 13
Project Lending
Expected from bank before approval:
– Evaluation of project benefits and risks
Is economic justification believable?
– Are assumptions logical and believable?
– Are financial projections, especially cash flow, realistic?
– Have all risks been adequately identified?
Does company management have sufficient expertise?
Can any risks be mitigated by insurance or “bonding”?
If recourse, can owner survive failed project and repay
bank?
14. 14
Project Lending
Expected from bank before approval:
– Is project time schedule realistic?
– Is cost overrun contingency adequate?
– Proposal for loan structure
Collateral
Covenants
Recourse
– Preparation of borrowing schedule
– Can bank manage failed project to recover loan?
15. 15
Project Lending
Expected from owner after approval:
– Project status reports
Percentage completion
Actual expenditures versus budgeted expenditures
Cash flow re-forecasts
Changes to project
Increases or decreases in risk
– Borrowing requests … based on scheduled
expenditures
16. 16
Project Lending
Expected from bank after approval:
– Ongoing review of status reports provided by owner
– Regular on-site inspections of project progress by
experts
– Careful “yes or no” decision to fund each borrowing
request based on project progress and known risks
– If recourse, ongoing review of owner’s other “normal”
business operations through ordinary credit analysis
17. 17
Project Lending
Loan structure
– Recourse (guarantees, etc.)
Bank wants recourse to owner and owner’s assets
– Moral value even if limited economic value
[partner/ sophisticated investor theory]
– Exercising rights of recourse expensive, time consuming
Owner wants “non-recourse” financing
18. 18
Project Lending
Loan structure
– To completion versus through completion:
To completion
– Acquisition/ development/ construction only
– Completion guarantee
From owner to bank
From general contractor to owner, assigned to bank
Liquidated damages
– Standby or “take out” financing
19. 19
Project Lending
Loan structure
– To completion versus through completion:
Through completion
– Financing ongoing operations
– Clear conditions for if/ when working capital line/ loan begins
– Clear conditions for if/ when acquisition/ construction loan
converts into permanent term loan for property/ equipment
– Revised set of operating covenants
20. 20
Project Lending
Loan structure
– Covenants
Acquisition/ construction
– Restrictive covenants to prevent loss of collateral value
– Prescriptive covenants to promote successful completion
– Tangible Net Worth
– Net Working Capital
Permanent/ operational financing
– Debt/ Worth
– Current Ratio
– EBITDA
21. 21
Credit Analysis
What factors influence the ability of a borrower
to repay a loan?
– External factors
– Internal factors
22. 22
Credit Analysis
External versus internal factors:
– Good external factors can not offset poor internal
factors.
– Good internal factors can often mitigate weak
external factors.
23. 23
Credit Analysis
External factor analysis — a caution:
– There are vast amounts of macro economic data
available. The amount of industry-specific data is
overwhelming. Analyzing these external factors is
time consuming and often expensive. Decisions
about how much analysis of external factors to
include in a credit report should be based on the
degree to which the analyst thinks these factors will
affect a borrower’s ability to repay its loans.
24. 24
PEST Analysis
Political Factors
– Political factors include governmental laws and
regulations which define the rules of commerce.
Political stability
Labor laws
Tax laws
Trade restrictions
Environmental regulations
25. 25
PEST Analysis
Economic Factors
– Economic factors include basic characteristics that
affect consumer purchasing power and corporate
capital costs.
Economic growth
Wage rates
Inflation rate
Interest rates
Exchange rates
Energy costs
26. 26
PEST Analysis
Social Factors
– Social factors include demographic and cultural
attitudes of a population that can influence issues as
diverse as work force flexibility and market potential.
Population demographics
Educational quality
Labor unions
Healthcare
Work attitudes
27. 27
PEST Analysis
Technological Factors
– Technological factors include research and
development activities that can lower barriers to
entry, reduce minimum efficient production levels,
and influence outsourcing decisions.
Basic academic research
Applied research and development
Automation potential
Information systems
Technology incentives
28. 28
Sector Analysis
Industry sector analysis:
– If a borrower has a significant share of industry
sales, say 10% or more, it is then very important to
fully review available information regarding the
outlook for the industry. (Many government agencies and
investment banks publish a variety of sector reviews.)
29. 29
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
– A company’s strengths are its resources and
capabilities that can be used as a basis for
developing a competitive advantage.
Good reputation
Strong brand names
Patents
Proprietary cost advantages
Access to high-grade natural resources
Favorable access to distribution networks
30. 30
SWOT Analysis
Weaknesses
– The absence of certain strengths usually results in
weaknesses.
Poor reputation
Weak brand names
Lack of patent protection
High cost structure
Lack of access to natural resources
Lack of access to key distribution channels
31. 31
SWOT Analysis
Opportunities
– The external environment may offer certain new
opportunities for profit and growth.
Unfulfilled customer need
Development of new technologies
Loosening of regulations
Removal of trade barriers
32. 32
SWOT Analysis
Threats
– Changes in the external environment may also
present threats to a company.
Shifts in consumer tastes away from company’s products
Emergence of substitute products
New regulations
Increased trade barriers
35. 35
Credit Analysis
Internal factor analysis:
– Financial information
Ratios
Trends
Cash flow
– Management information
Background and experience
Behavior as reflected in financial performance
36. 36
Liquidity Ratios
Current Ratio
sLiabilitieCurrentTotal
AssetsCurrentTotal
This ratio is a rough indication of a company’s ability to
service its current liabilities when due. A high value is better
than a low value. A ratio larger than one means there are
more assets that are already cash or that can be converted
into cash within a year than there are liabilities that will have
to be paid with cash. However, the composition and quality
of current assets is a critical factor in the analysis of an
individual company’s liquidity.
37. 37
Leverage Ratios
Debt/ Worth
This ratio measures the relationship between capital
contributed by creditors and that contributed by owners
(minus any intangibles). It expresses the degree to which
owners’ equity provides protection for creditors. A value that
is lower than the industry norm is better than a value that is
higher than the industry norm. A lower ratio generally
indicates greater long-term financial safety and greater
flexibility to borrow in the future.
WorthNetTangible
sLiabilitieTotal
38. 38
Project Investing
Common measures of return
– Cost-benefit analysis (CBA)
– Payback period
– Net present value (NPV)
– Internal rate of return (IRR)
39. 39
Project Investing
Cost-benefit analysis
– Compare total costs to total benefits
– If competing projects, choose:
Most profitable
“Best”
– Not always financial
40. 40
Project Investing
Payback period
– Period of time it takes to recover the initial
investment
– Does not properly account for:
Time value of money
Inflation
Risk
Financing costs
– Managers like it because it is easy
41. 41
Project Investing
Internal Rate of Return
– Potential problems:
Understates reinvestment value of future positive cash flows
Cannot deal with negative cash flows near end of a project
(e.g., environmental cleanup costs)
Cannot deal with changing degrees of risk over life of a
project
– Managers like it because it can be used to compare
projects of different size
42. 42
Project Investing
Mutual exclusivity
– Assume a limit on availability of capital at
an acceptable cost
– Corresponding limit on the number of investments
that can be made
If projects are mutually exclusive, academics argue that
NPV is a better analytical measure than IRR
Ex: High initial cost versus high future cash flows
43. 43
Project Investing
Complex measures of return
– Modified internal rate of return (MIRR)
Positive cash flows discounted at weighted average cost of
capital (WACC) instead of discount rate making positive
cash flows more valuable
Future negative cash flows discounted separately and
added to initial cost of project
44. 44
Project Investing
Complex measures of return
– Real options analysis
Each separate cash flow assumed to have unique
uncertainty or risk
Uncertainty of each separate cash flow accounted for using
“risk-adjusting probabilities”
Risk-adjusted cash flows then discounted at risk-free rate