Genesis 1:10 || Meditate the Scripture daily verse by verse
Institutional Funding Guide for INGOs in Tough Times
1. Institutional Funding in tough times
A practitioner’s guide
Lysa Ralph, Head of High Value Giving, British Red Cross
Philip Goodwin, Chief Executive, Tree Aid
2. Session overview
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Clarification and definition
Outlook for general fundraising
Institutional donor trends / features
Savvy INGO’s – commonalities & success rates
INGO growth 2008-12
Tree Aid’s approach
Last thoughts
Useful sites / resources
Questions
3. Point of clarification…
Money is not a dirty word!!
Fundraising, funding co-ordination,
resource mobilisation…
…essentials and disciplines are the same
4. Definition of Institutional Funding
Funding from governmental donors plus those whose assessment
methodology / priorities share the characteristics and requirements i.e. project cycle management - of governmental donors:
UK government streams – e.g. DFID, Island donors eg Jersey
Overseas Aid, Scottish Government International Funds
European Commission – ECHO / DEVCO
Other countries government funding streams e.g. USAID
‘Foundations’ sharing those behaviours - Comic Relief, Big Lottery
5. Outlook for general fundraising
> Supplier capacity
> Increased competition
> Demands for donor engagement
> Social media creating closer relationships
> Potential to flatline ??
6. Trends – Institutional income
State Funding of Voluntary Sector (£bn)
14
£ bn
13
12.8
12
12.8
11.9
11.9
11.8
Public Funding of
Voluntary Sector
11.3
11
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
> Between 2006-11, despite the economic outlook, increase in state
funding to the voluntary sector of 4%, plus ringfenced Int’l Aid
> EC budget reduced for first time, down 1.5% for 2014-2020 €960bn,
from €975 bn 2007-2013
> DFID’s ringfencing / commitment to 0.7 GDP may not last beyond 2015
7. Trends – IF features
> Shift away from grants to contracts:
> 2001 grants worth £4.6 billion, contracts £3.8 billion
> By 2008, grants worth £3.7 billion, £9.1 billion worth of
contracts
> Full cost recovery principles widely accepted, set
margins
> Increase in ‘payment by results’; Social Return on
Investment / Social Impact Bonds
> Polarisation of the sector, consortia development
> Need to evidence outcomes / impact
> Increase in competition
> Introduction of private sector, new landscape
8. Donor trends / savvy INGO’s
> Decentralised operations / decision making
> Preference to reduce admin costs / deal with consortia lead /
Int’l orgs / input to central funds eg Global Fund
> Assessment via programme cycle management methodology:
‘theory of change’
> Ownership by local actors
> Shared policy environment / MDG’s etc
> Value for Money / having policies around this
9. Return on investment, success rates
> High return on investment: IoF Fundraising Index
2012 - £16:1
> BRCS success rates:
– EC 1:5 rising to 1:3 where closest to core mission
= ECHO.
– Lottery 85% against a sector average of 15%
> Tree Aid: 1:3 success rate by number of
submissions, 1:4 by project value
10. INGO’s ranked by institutional income (2012)
Rank
Total income
Institutional funding
1
Oxfam
367.90
162.10
2
Save the Children
283.75
150.66
3
Merlin
60.86
54.88
4
CARE International
43.68
31.98
5
Christian Aid
95.45
27.44
6
British Red Cross
200.10
21.40
7
World Vision
68.79
21.06
8
Plan
54.25
20.06
9
Islamic Relief
100.37
19.47
10
Tearfund
60.05
18.56
11
Action Aid
59.45
15.33
12
CAFOD
48.80
11.11
13
Concern Worldwide
14.62
6.79
14
UNICEF
62.33
3.99
15
MSF
23.89
0.00
11. Total income and IF income, 15 INGO’s 2008-12
1800
1,694.56
Income (£millions)
1600
1400
1200
1,544.79
1299.776
1,544.28
1,337.97
1000
Total income
800
IF income
600
400
409.25
425.57
535.47
638.18
564.84
200
0
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
> Many grew their Institutional income quite dramatically, avg +38%
- British Red Cross, + 570% 2008-11
- Tree Aid, £195k to £1.1m and growing, doubled since 2011
12. IF income of charities (2008 - 2012)
200.00
180.00
160.00
Income (£millions)
140.00
120.00
2008
2009
100.00
2010
2011
80.00
2012
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
British Red
Cross
CARE
International
Christian Aid
Merlin
Oxfam
Plan
Save the
Children
World Vision
13. Institutional funding as a proportion of total income
400.00
350.00
Total income (£millions)
300.00
250.00
Other income
200.00
Inst. Funding
150.00
100.00
50.00
0.00
British Red
Cross
CARE
Christian Aid
International
Merlin
Oxfam
Plan
Save the
Children
World Vision
16. Building Capacity to Attract Funding
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Building strategic relationships
Understanding the "market"
Building credibility and track record
Increasing visibility and evidence of impact
Resources
22. 5. Resources / tools to pursue funding
> Fundraisers = highly valuable assets = not cheap
> Interpretation – EC, DFID, Lottery
– Experience: programme management, track record
fundraising success, building / monitoring complex budgets
– Knowledge : technical donor knowledge (<ECHO / DEVCO)
– Skills: relationship building; communication; negotiation,
financial, creativity, research, statistical analysis
– Characteristics: resilience, patience and ….Zen!
> Investment of staff time
– In-house teams
– How they are constructed
– Use of external support
23. Last thoughts
> Match - European Commission: co-financing – from
15% International to 50% domestic - can include
cash and / or in kind match
> Stewardship – Trusts approach to Inst Funding
> Know your place / added value in your sphere
> Be nimble, react to trends / corporate dfid wash
> Understand risks / resources needed & investment /
don’t just follow the money
> Know your theory / story of change …can you hook
them emotionally?
24. Useful sites
EuropeAid / Search – ‘calls for proposals’
http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/index_en.htm
Local, regional, national and European sources
http://www.governmentfunding.org.uk/default.aspx
fundsforngos.org
http://www.inprogressweb.com/
http://www.trustfunding.org.uk/default.aspx
http://www.biglotteryfund.org.uk/funding
Lysato cover slides – Phil answering a consortia question when we get to it -increase in PBR Q. Helen / BBC - How medium sized organisations, with v limited / no unrestricted funding can work within the new DFID (and probably soon to be others) preference for a payment by results mechanism. Any thoughts from you on what payment by results will look like in practice, and to what extent (if at all) it is likely to move to being linked to outcome level results as opposed to output level results would be useful to know.Lysa - WASH –rejected a full outcomes PBR as it would be too difficult to design /; NGO’s not take risk and wanted delivery quicker – all experiments for them-polarisation of the sector. Large INGO’s on the one side with ability to act as Int’l org & to pre finance work & the smaller INGO’s who are forming consortiaQ. Julie Hurst/ practicalaction Strategies for building consortia A. Phil - BRACED Q. Helen / BBC Q. How medium sized organisations with no unrestricted funding can compete against the big players when the large orgs can use their unrestricted income to make their budgets more competitive and more value for money? Smaller orgs need to recoup a high proportion of running costs from project budgets and this can make budgets look admin heavy, yet it is the only way to cover actual costs. Any tips on how this can be done in an innovative way would be most helpful.And Q. Robin Stafford. How can the large institutions be persuaded to adopt more consistent, transparent and realistic approaches to full cost recovery so that NGO’s can reduce or eliminate their dependency on subsidies from increasingly scarce unrestricted funding?Phil - no clever answer about full cost recovery except ensuring you include all eligible costs, have a standard fee for situs where you can charge it that is FCR. Otherwise it’s about really effective planning & going into that a bit later in terms of portfolio planning-evidencing outcomes & impact / language may differ but-hugely competitive / new landscape with private sector alongside us
LysaResearch carried out by BRCS, October 2013, reviewed by annual accounts
LysaBRCS growth was in International Institutional, UK - including contracts was flat
LysaSave will overtake Oxfam this year with Merlin merger
LysaHence why it is a good idea not to become over reliant on govt income – Merlin