Statergy mgmt

Implementation of Risk Management Strategies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Incentives for Risky Decisions ,[object Object],Sure Thing Risky Alternative Success .5 Failure .5 Manager’s Outcomes Promotion Fired Pat on Back Company’s Outcomes $1,000,000 -$100,000 $100,000

Decentralization and “Gambler’s Ruin” ,[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Success (0.2) Failure (0.8) $10,000,000 -$1,000,000 EV = $1,200,000

Establishing Appropriate Incentives ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Limitations of Expected Value ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

EMV - Unlimited Pool of Capital? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Unlimited Pool of Capital? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

EMV - The Firm is Risk Neutral? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

EV - Failure to Provide Guidance on Limiting Downside Exposure ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],0.50 0.80 $200M -$40M $88M -$20M Prospect B Prospect A 0.20 0.50

Risk Methods Used in Making Decisions by Energy Companies (J. Battle, 1986)

A Comment on Risk-Adjusted Discount Rates ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],Long Life Venture .2 .8 -10 - 100/(1+ i) 3 + 500/(1+ i ) 10 -10 ($MM) Short Life Venture .2 .8 -10 + 60/1+ i -10 ($MM) Short Life Long Life Discount Rate NPV if Success NPV if Success 10% $44.5 MM $107.0 MM 20% $40.0 MM $ 12.8 MM ,[object Object]

Preference or Expected Utility Theory ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Attitudes Toward Risk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Attitudes Toward Risk -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Assessing a Utility Function ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Session ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Session -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Session -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object]

Comments on Preference Assessment ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Step 4. Find the risk premium. Risk Premium = EV - CEQ $600 = $1500 - $900

[object Object],[object Object],A B .5 .7 .1 .4 .3 $10,000 $4,000 $0 $8,000 $2,000 EV = $6600 EV = $6200

Example 6.9 Incorporating Attitudes Toward Risk

Background Information ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Background Information -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Risk Aversion - Functional Forms ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Expected Value = $5,000 Expected Utility = 0.32 CEQ = $2,800 Risk Premium = $2,200 where, p = 0.5 1 - p = 0.5 $20,000 -$10,000

[object Object],p = 0.5 1 - p = 0.5 $20,000 -$10,000 (A) $30,000 $0 (B) $40,000 $10,000 (C) $50,000 $20,000 (D) Expected Value: Expected Utility: Certainty Equivalent: Risk Premium: ,[object Object],[object Object],$5,000 0.32 $2,800 $2,200 $15,000 0.52 $12,800 $2,200 $25,000 0.68 $22,800 $2,200 $35,000 0.82 $32,800 $2,200

Exponential Utility ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Exponential Utility -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Exponential Utility -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Solution ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Decision Tree ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

VENTURE.XLS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Interpretation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Interpretation -- continued ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Certainty Equivalents ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Decision Tree with Certainty Equivalents

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Project B Project A .4 .1 .3 .2 $700,000 $100,000 -$50,000 -$450,000 .4 .1 .3 .2 $800,000 $200,000 -$100,000 -$500,000 $0 Invest Do not Invest EV = $210,000 at 100% EV(B) = $185,000 EV(A) = $210,000

[object Object],Project B Project A .4 .1 .3 .2 $700,000 $100,000 -$50,000 -$450,000 .4 .1 .3 .2 $800,000 $200,000 -$100,000 -$500,000 $0 Invest Do not Invest CEQ = $0 Do not Invest CEQ(B) = -$30,000 CEQ (A) = -$85,000 ...and analyze our investment problem on the basis of certainty equivalents. ,[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Measuring Risk Tolerance ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

SSG Utility Function Worksheet ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

RT & Analysis of Past Decisions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Risk Tolerance & Financial Measures ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Risk Tolerance (RT) And Firm Performance ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Corporate RT - An Industry Look ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Risk Tolerance versus Firm Size ,[object Object],7.6 8.0 8.4 8.8 9.2 9.6 10.0 10.4 10.8 Log (RT) vs. Log (SMCF) Log (RT) Year: 1983-1990 8.6 8.2 7.8 7.4 7.0 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.4 Regression Line Log (SMCF) Observed Data

Risk Tolerance - Comparing Firms ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Risk Tolerance Ratio ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

RTR - A Relative Measure of Risk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

RTR - The Performance Implications ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Summary of Concepts Regarding the Estimation of a Risk Attitude ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Statergy mgmt

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Statergy mgmt

Ähnlich wie Statergy mgmt (20)

Mehr von Babasab Patil

Mehr von Babasab Patil (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Statergy mgmt