3. Photography
Structured
Light Scanning
3D Modeling
GIS
Aerial &
Terrestrial
Laser Scanning
Augmented
Reality
Point Clouds
Meshes
CISA3Layered Realities
& Beyond…

5. Conclusion: Constructs need to be
meaningful & navigable
Escher WikiCommons

7. Storage Issues
Access & Discovery
Issues
Danish
Antiquarian
Ole Worm’s
17th Century
Cabinet of
Curiosities
The recently “discovered” olinguito

8. The Physical Site The 2D
Representation of
the Site
The 3D Layered
Navigable
Representation of
the Site

10. *Economic Issues-
Price IS going down slowly –
hope for cost efficiency in the
future
Graph: M. Mansour
*So Much Data-
Who is Combing through it?
Anyone?
Anything?

11. Sustainability of Storage Platforms?

12. If we have a Star Trek holodeck that can show us the past – the real scientific
remains of sites and artifacts as well as the imagined re-created layers in all
temporal forms…what will that mean for site preservation and the devotion of
spaces to physical artifacts?

13. Too Little Information… Too Wrong!…
Too Much Information without
means of clarification?
Smithsonian Natural History Museum
British Museum Creationist Museum
Rarely does the archaeologist get to directly write the museum labels…

14. Digital = Potential for Auto-Publication
(and shouldn’t things be available as soon as possible without interference?)
Changing International Legislation Paradigms on cultural access?
(a whole new can of worms someone can tackle in a different presentation?)

17. Archaeology & Nationalism
The Past Re-Invented to Justify
Nation-Building and Religious
Connectivity

19. The Pop Culture
Past: Casting
Aspersions on our
Methodologies
Fringe
Archaeology
Prevalence in
the Media
We can’t let pseudoscience win!

20. (Forthcoming Paper: Technology
Engineered for Cultural Heritage as a
Means to turn STEM into STEAM)
International Education Emphasis is on:
Should be on:
Science
Technology
ART
ARCHITECTURE
&
ARCHAEOLOGY
Engineering
Mathematics

21. Not just the descriptives of where it came from,
but how it came from there- what technologies were used? In which combination? Under
what conditions?
How was it collected?
We need/want enough information to make digital collection replicable
(and therefore more diagnostically viable)

22. Who collected the raw data?
(What qualified them?)
Who processed the data?
(What qualified them?)
How did the data get
processed?
Who accessed the data?
What did they
add/subsequently create from
it?

23. DEMOCRATIZING THE PAST…

24. What will 3D Printed Artifacts Mean for
Authenticity?
How will this change Storage priorities and
conservation legislation?
What will this mean for low-cost educational
engagement in schools and museums?
= TEASER for an upcoming paper of mine
at Marseilles’ Digital Heritage
3D Printed Artifacts By CISA3
collaborator Cosmos Wenman