2. Stewardship and Cultural Memory
Organizations in the Digital Age (Sep 12, 2008)
Notes & remarks (MuseumsWiki)
– cf. Google search (“Stewardship…”)
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
2
3. History, Heritage, and
Cultural Memory Organizations I
“It is useful to distinguish between
– the past, what happened;
– history, accounts of the past; and
– heritage, which consists of those parts of the past that affect
us in the present. […]
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
3
4. History, Heritage, and
Cultural Memory Organizations II
Histories are always multiple and and incomplete […]
Included in our cultural, intellectual, and professional heritage
are the historical narratives we know and we accept and which
help shape our sense of identity.”
– Buckland, M. K. (2006). Emanuel Goldberg and his
knowledge machine information, invention, and political
forces. New directions in information management.
Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited, pp. 254, 255
Dynamic character of heritage and the role of cultural memory
organizations
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
4
5. Complex cultural context
Robert L. Stevenson
The Bottle Imp
Honolulu
Ballroom
Heinrich Berger
Letters
Royal Hawaiian Band
“Thither he went, because he feared to
be alone; and there, among happy faces,
walked to and fro, and heard the tunes
go up and down, and saw Berger beat
the measure, and all the while he heard
the flames crackle, and saw the red fire
burning in the bottomless pit.”
Kingdom of Hawaiʻi
King Kalākaua
Molokaʻi
Leprosy
Leper colony
Father Damien
Hoʻokena
Haole
Literature
Music
History
Geography
Language
Wikipedia:
“The Bottle Imp”
Historical and
cultural background
Kōkua
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
5
6. Which web is what?
"the semantic web is never going to get here. Instead
we'll pour more semanticness into the existing web"
– http://twitter.com/dmje/statuses/785062078, referring to
Weaving a Web of Data (MW2008 workshop)
“The web has immense semantic value already.
However, for a specific purpose the correlative
semantic relations have to be extracted from the
surrounding noise and to be expressed in a formal
structure or model.”
– http://museums.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Jpbowen#Semantic
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
6
7. Standards for cultural heritage information
Museums as example
–
–
–
–
–
documentation
procedures
data structure
terminology
…
different
– cultures
– levels
– scopes
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
7
8. CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model
CIDOC: International Committee on Documentation,
International Council of Museums
International standard (ISO 21127:2006)
– controlled exchange of cultural heritage information
– formal ontology for archives, libraries and museums
– implementations and utilizations still rare
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
8
12. Function, role, task
Language
– Type
• Lingua franca
• Standard
• Regional
– Function
• Communicate
• Collaborate
• Exchange
CoReWIKI
– Types and levels of
expert knowledge
– Communicate,
collaborate & exchange
information
– Flexible tool
– Dynamics
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
12
14. Benefits and needs
Efficient node and repository
Flexible and extendable
knowledge base
Combines restrictions and
accuracy of standards with
collaborative environment
September 19, 2008
Individual commitment
Institutional care and support
Publicity
Resources
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
14
16. See also
New York Semantic Web Meetup
at the Museum 2008
– CoReWIKI and Semantic Web: A node for cultural heritage s
MuseumsWiki
Semantic Web and Wikis
September 19, 2008
The Friday Afternoon Seminar, UC Berkeley iSchool
16
Abstract
Museums as well as other communities related to cultural heritage have developed many standards with different scopes and levels of implementation. The CIDOC CRM is the international standard (ISO 21127:2006) for the controlled exchange of cultural heritage information. Although covering the universe of cultural heritage concepts and providing the formal ontology for archives, libraries and museums, implementations and utilizations of this model are still considered rare.
While the CIDOC CRM is the result of the efforts of the specialized CIDOC working group, it seems to be difficult for other members of the professional community of museum specialists to share the highly abstract essence of a conceptual reference model. The same is true for other complex and diversified standards. Wikis with semantic functionality are capable to deal with both the complex and abstract features of an ontology as well as multiple pieces of data and information. Therefore the combination of the model and a wiki can provide new qualities of accessibility and connectivity for cultural heritage standards.
http://www.swnyc.org/index.php?title=New_York_Semantic_Web_Meetup_at_the_Museum_2008