2. Aims
• Review key weight bias concepts
and theories.
• Apply concepts to practice:
o prevalence of weight bias
o implications for health
o effects on quality of care.
• Discuss strategies for change.
4. Obesity stigma – social sign or label affixed to an
individual who is the victim of prejudice.
Weight bias – negative attitudes towards, and
beliefs about, others because of their weight.
Weight-based discrimination – enactment
of weight bias and stigma.
Some key concepts …
5. • Negative attitudes and
views about obesity
and people with obesity
Weight bias
• Labelling, stereotyping
• Damaged identities
• Deeply rooted in
society
Obesity
stigma
• Verbal, physical,
relational
• Subtle and overt
actions/expressions
Weight-based
discrimination
Bias
Stigma
Discrimin
ation
6. • lazy
• awkward
• sloppy
• non-compliant
• unintelligent
• unsuccessful
• lacking the self-discipline and self-control
necessary to manage their weight
Stereotypes and negative attitudes towards patients …
Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2009)
Puhl RM, Luedicke J, Grilo CM
(2014)
7. Stigma and population health
• There are many stigmatized conditions that affect large portions of
the general population.
• Disease stigma has a major and persistent influence on
population health.
• Stigma studies focus on outcomes: housing, employment or
income, social relationships, psychological or behavioural
responses, health care access, and overall health.
• Stigma is an added burden that affects people above and beyond
any impairments they may have.
8. Consequences of weight bias
• Negative consequences include shame and guilt, anxiety,
depression, poor self-esteem and body dissatisfaction that
can lead to unhealthy weight-control practices.
• Weight bias also negatively affects access to obesity
treatment, educational attainment, employment
opportunities and quality of health care, ultimately leading
to inequalities.
Pearl RL, Puhl RM (2016)
Forhan M, Salas XR (2013)
9. Stigma is a population health issue
Stigma
Stereotyp
es that
damage
peoples’
identities
Suppress
individual
s’ agency
(stress,
anxiety)
Social
exclusion
and
discrimin
ation
Social,
economi
c and
health
inequalit
ies
Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG (2013)
11. What causes weight bias?
• Belief that obesity is caused by controllable behavioural
factors (eating too much and moving too little).
• Desirability of a thin body in Western culture (social norms).
• Ideological views and personality traits.
• Feelings about one’s own appearance (social identity
theory).
12. Do public health professionals have weight
bias?
Do public health messages/strategies
contribute to weight bias?
13. Weight bias in health care
Dietitians and nurses …
view patients with obesity as overeaters, lacking self-control and
willpower, unattractive, insecure, slow, non-compliant,
overindulgent, lazy and unsuccessful.
Nurses …
would prefer not to care for patients with obesity, feel repulsed
by them, and would prefer not to touch them.
Psychologists …
ascribe more pathology, severe symptoms, negative attributes,
and worse prognosis.
14. Weight bias in health care
Medical students’ views:
• poor self-control, less likely to adhere, sloppy, awkward,
unsuccessful, unpleasant.
Physicians’ views:
• non-compliant, lazy, lacking in self-control, weak-willed,
unsuccessful, unintelligent, dishonest.
15. Impact of weight bias on quality of care
• Ambivalence about treatment roles
• Less time spent with patients
• Less discussion with patients
• More ascribing of negative symptoms
• Reduced preventative health services and exams (fewer cancer
screens, pelvic exams, mammograms)
• Less intervention
Merrill E, Grassley J (2008)
Drury CA, Louis M (2002)
16. Weight-related barriers in healthcare
• Inaccessible equipment and facilities
• Embarrassment about being weighed
• Unsolicited advice about losing weight
• Receiving inappropriate comments about their weight
• Being treated disrespectfully because of their weight
Puhl RM, Heuer CA
(2009)
17. Lack of training on obesity
Weight is a conversation stopper
• Professionals report inadequate training (1).
• Shift training curricula to provide the necessary understanding of
obesity (2).
Lack of training in HCP training programmes
• Health promotion at community/individual levels.
• Nutrition and lifestyle contributors.
• Training in weight bias is not included in a systematic way (3).
(1) Jay M, Kalet A, Ark T, McMacken M, Messito MJ, Richter R et al. (2009)
(2) Brown I, Flint SW (2013); Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, Sharma AM, Freedhoff Y (2013)
(3) Russell-Mayhew S, Nutter S, Alberga AS, Jelinski S, Ball GDC, Edwards A et al. (2016)
18. Patient perspective
It’s simple: eat less, move more …
“When I deconstruct this message, it says to me that
public health professionals believe I did this to myself
so they don’t need to help me find evidence-based
treatments.”
“The eat less, move more message makes it sound
really simple, doesn’t it? But my journey has NOT
been simple. It has been difficult for me. Every day is
difficult.”
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
19. Patient perspective: healthy weight
“I have lost over 100 lb [45 kg], but I am still obese
according to the BMI categories. My goal is to
maintain this weight loss. Based on what I am doing
now, I cannot eat less and I cannot exercise more.
So, I will never achieve the healthy weight range
promoted through public health campaigns. I am at
my best weight and I need to accept that.”
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
20. Patient perspective
• Patients feel frustration with lack of effective weight
management strategies.
• They feel trapped in yo-yo diet cycles.
• Obesity prevention does not represent their realities.
• Public health messages put the blame on individuals.
• They feel shame and blame for not being able to
implement public health recommendations.
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
21. Patient perspective
• Messages are overly simplistic and narrowly focused.
• They ignore the struggle people have every day.
• The underlying assumption is that weight management is easy.
• It is assumed that people with obesity are bad citizens, that
they are irresponsible.
• Stereotypical images – the idea that people with obesity
engage in unhealthy behaviours and make unhealthy choices.
• There is resistance and rejection of public health messages.
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
22. Patient perspective
• Internalize stigma and develop unhealthy coping strategies
(unhealthy eating behaviours – binge eating, unhealthy
weight loss practices).
• Delay preventive health care services and adopt poor self-
care practices.
• Avoid interactions with health care professionals.
• Vulnerable to:
o depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, poor body image,
suicidal acts and thoughts;
o poor quality of life.
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
23. Summary: individual and public health
consequences of weight bias and stigma
Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2010)
24. Weight bias reduction interventions:
systematic review
Interventions addressing weight bias
• Few studies exist (n = 17).
• Mixed samples (n = 15 students in training, n = 2 practising HCPs).
No magic way to address weight bias
• Deciphering successful strategies/approaches (used in combination).
• Need to move beyond awareness and information provision to raise
skills and competencies in health professionals.
• A change in social norms and ideologies about body weight required.
Alberga AS, Pickering BJ, Alix Hayden K, Ball GD,
Edwards A, Jelinski S et al. (2016)
25. Health care sector: key messages from systematic
review of weight bias reduction interventions
1. Presenting facts about uncontrollable and non-modifiable
causes of obesity.
2. Evoking empathy by positive contact with patients living with
obesity.
3. Peer-modelling, shadowing with empathic experts.
4. Repeated exposure to patients over the long term.
Alberga AS, Pickering BJ, Alix Hayden K, Ball GD,
Edwards A, Jelinski S et al. (2016)
26. Recommendations for public health
• Consider the unintended consequences of population health
messages (critical reflection).
• Aim healthy eating strategies and messages at the entire
population without focusing on weight reduction.
• Challenge healthy weight messaging by shifting focus to health
and move away from quantifying health in terms of numbers.
• Challenge the individual choice and the energy in, energy out
paradigms.
• Examine language, beliefs, values, practices and relationships
that contribute to stigma and health disparities.
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
27. Recommendations for public health
• Consider complexity of obesity and peoples’ lived
experiences.
• Give people with obesity a voice (engage them in the
development of public health strategies).
• Shift focus from individual behaviour change to improving
sociocultural, economic and physical environments that can
enable health and well-being for the whole population.
Ramos Salas X. PhD Thesis (2016)
28. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity –
recommendations for health professionals
1. Consider patients’ previous negative experiences.
2. Recognize that having obesity is a product of many factors.
3. Explore all causes of presenting problems (not just weight).
4. Recognize that many patients have tried to lose weight repeatedly.
5. Emphasize importance of behaviour change rather than weight.
6. Acknowledge the difficulty of making lifestyle changes.
7. Recognize that small weight losses can improve health.
29. Rudd Center recommendations for health
professionals: identify your own attitudes!
• Do I make assumptions based on weight regarding character,
intelligence, professional success, health status, or lifestyle
behaviours?
• Am I comfortable working with people of all shapes and sizes?
• Do I give appropriate feedback to encourage healthful behaviour
change?
• Am I sensitive to the needs and concerns of individuals with
obesity?
• Do I treat the individual or only the condition?
30. What can we change in primary care practice?
• Focus more on health and wellness and less on weight or weight loss.
• Remove all magazines or brochures from the waiting area that
stereotype people with obesity.
• Do not weigh patients or discuss their weight in public areas.
• Have gowns, tape measures, scales, BP cuffs in your office designed
to fit larger-than-average patients.
• Have assistive devices available for patients to make it easier to put on
socks or shoes.
• Install grab bars in the washroom.
• Be sure to have seating that will accommodate/support a larger-than-
average body size and shape.
31. References (1)
• Alberga AS, Pickering BJ, Alix Hayden K, Ball GD, Edwards A, Jelinski S et al. (2016). Weight bias reduction in
health professionals: a systematic review. Clin Obes. 6(3):175–88. doi: 10.1111/cob.12147.
• Brown I, Flint SW (2013). Weight bias and the training of health professionals to better manage obesity: what do
we know and what should we do? Curr Obes Rep. 2(4):333–40.
• Budd GM, Mariotti M, Graff D, Falkenstein K (2011). Health care professionals’ attitudes about obesity: an
integrative review. Appl Nurs Res. 24(3):127–37. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
• Chaput JP, Ferraro ZM, Prud’homme D, Sharma AM (2014). Widespread misconceptions about obesity. Can
Fam Physician. 60(11):973–5, 981–4.
• Cramer P, Steinwert T (1998). Thin is good, fat is bad: how early does it begin? J Appl Dev Psychol. 19:429–51.
• DeJong W (1980). The stigma of obesity: the consequences of naive assumptions concerning the causes of
physical deviance. J Health Soc Behav. 21(1):75–87.
• Drury CA, Louis M (2002). Exploring the association between body weight, stigma of obesity, and health care
avoidance. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 14(12):554–61.
• Forhan M, Salas XR (2013). Inequities in healthcare: a review of bias and discrimination in obesity treatment.
Can J Diabetes. 37(3):205–9.
• Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG (2013). Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities.
Am J Public Health. 103(5):813–21.
• Janssen I, Craig WM, Boyce WF, Pickett W (2004). Associations between overweight and obesity with bullying
behaviors in school-aged children. Pediatrics. 113(5):1187–94.
32. References (2)
• Jay M, Kalet A, Ark T, McMacken M, Messito MJ, Richter R et al. (2009). Physicians’ attitudes about obesity
and their associations with competency and specialty: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 9:106.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-106.
• Merrill E, Grassley J (2008). Women’s stories of their experiences as overweight patients. J Adv Nurs.
64(2):139–46.
• Pearl RL, Puhl RM (2016). The distinct effects of internalizing weight bias: an experimental study. Body Image.
17:38–42.
• Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison
to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes (Lond). 32(6):992–1000. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.22.
Epub 2008 Mar 4.
• Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2009). The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity (Silver Spring). 17(5):941–64.
doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.636. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
• Puhl RM, Heuer CA (2010). Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health.
100(6):1019–28. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159491. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
• Puhl RM, Latner JD (2007). Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bull. 133(4):557–
80.
• Puhl RM, Luedicke J, Grilo CM (2014). Obesity bias in training: attitudes, beliefs, and observations among
advanced trainees in professional health disciplines. Obesity (Silver Spring). 22(4):1008–15. doi:
10.1002/oby.20637. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
33. References (3)
• Ramos Salas X (2015). The ineffectiveness and unintended consequences of the public health war on
obesity. Can J Public Health. 106(2):e79–81. doi: 10.17269/cjph.106.4757.
• Ramos Salas X, Forhan M, Caulfield T, Sharma AM, Raine K (2018). A critical analysis of obesity prevention
policies and strategies. Can J Public Health. 108(5–6):e598–e608.
• Ramos Salas X, Forhan M, Sharma AM (2014). Diffusing obesity myths. Clin Obes. 4(3):189–96.
doi: 10.1111/cob.12059. Epub 2014 May 7.
• Roehling MV (1999). Weight-based discrimination in employment: psychological and legal aspects. Person
Psychol. 52(4):969–1016.
• Russell-Mayhew S, Nutter S, Alberga AS, Jelinski S, Ball GDC, Edwards A et al. (2016). Environmental scan
of weight bias exposure in primary health care training programs. Can J Scholarship Teaching Learning.
7(2). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2016.2.5.
• Sharma AM, Kushner RF (2009). A proposed clinical staging system for obesity. Int J Obes (Lond).
33(3):289–95. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2009.2. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
• Teachman BA, Brownell KD (2001). Implicit anti-fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune? Int
J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 25(10):1525–31.
• Vallis M, Piccinini-Vallis H, Sharma AM, Freedhoff Y (2013). Clinical review: modified 5 As: minimal
intervention for obesity counseling in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 59(1):27–31.
• Wang SS, Brownell KD, Wadden TA (2004). The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 28(10):1333–7.
Hinweis der Redaktion
Speaker notes
In this session we will provide an overview of obesity as a chronic disease and outline causes and consequences.
Speaker notes
Speaker notes
This slide was kindly lent by Dr Erin Cameron.
Let me tell you about my two friends … Look at these two images and take a minute to associate the right words with the right friend.
What if I told you that my friend on the left (larger silhouette) loves the outdoors and goes canoeing along the Ottawa River, has run five marathons and is very organized. She is also the founder of a successful not-for-profit organization that has over 20 000 volunteer members.
My friend on the right (smaller silhouette) knits beautiful baby clothes, loves to eat junk food, and is very shy and a bit socially awkward.
Is this how you associated words and images? This is one way that social stereotypes and cultural biases can affect our beliefs and attitudes towards people with obesity.
Speaker notes
To begin, let’s review some concepts that will be used throughout this presentation.
Weight bias is defined as negative attitudes towards, and beliefs about, others based on their weight. An example would be how some health professionals believe that people with obesity are lazy, unmotivated and lack discipline.
Obesity stigma, on the other hand, is the social sign or label that we attach to people who are the victims of prejudice. An example would be when we refer to people with obesity as obese people. When we do this, we are defining them on the basis of a characteristic. But obesity is a condition; it does not define a person – just as cancer, for example, does not define a person. We would not refer to a patient with cancer as “cancerous”, but in the case of obesity, we label people as obese all the time. When we label a person as obese, it is important to understand that there are social connotations that come with that label, such as laziness, lack of motivation or will power, etc.
Finally, weight-based discrimination is the enactment of weight bias and stigma. This concept concerns actions directed towards people with obesity that can cause exclusion and marginalization, and ultimately lead to health inequalities – for example, when people with obesity do not receive adequate health care or when they are excluded/marginalized in workplaces, schools and other social settings. We know, for example, that individuals who have obesity are less likely to get hired and to be recommended for promotions than thinner employees. That is weight-based discrimination.
Speaker notes
This graphic emphasizes the extent to which these concepts are interrelated. Weight bias attitudes can affect interpersonal interactions in a very negative way and can lead to stereotypes about people with obesity. These stereotypes, in turn, can create deeply rooted social labels about people with obesity. The stigma associated with these labels can then be manifested as verbal, physical and relational expressions or actions against people with obesity. These expressions include verbal teasing, physical bullying and social exclusion.
Speaker notes
Note: full references are given in the final slides of the presentation.
Speaker notes
What is the link between stigma and population health? We know that there are many stigmatized conditions, including sexual orientation, mental illness, disability, HIV status and obesity; these affect a large portion of the population.
Studies have shown that stigma has major implications for population health. For example, stigma is associated with poor health and social outcomes in the areas of housing, employment, income, social relationships, psychological and behavioural responses, health care treatment and overall health outcomes.
It is important to recognize that stigma can affect many of these outcomes together – although most studies on stigma have measured a single outcome. Overall, data show that stigma is an independent added burden on peoples’ health, above and beyond any impairments they may have.
Speaker notes
Speaker notes
Speaker notes
Studies conducted to date (mainly in the US, with some in Canada, the UK and Australia) indicate that we all have weight bias.
One of the youngest populations in which weight bias has been measured is in 3-year-old children.
In the case of health care professionals, weight bias has been documented among dietitians, physicians, nurses, psychologists, public health students, trainees in advanced health professional programmes, and even among obesity specialists.
Since obesity stigma is often internalized by people with obesity, weight bias has also been measured and demonstrated among patients with obesity.
Speaker notes
There are many theories about the causes of weight bias and obesity stigma.
The main theories point to the fact that people believe that obesity is a controllable condition and that people with obesity are just lazy and non-compliant with obesity treatments such as diets and exercise programmes.
Other mechanisms that have been associated with weight bias include social norms and the cultural desirability of thin bodies, ideological views and personality traits, and individuals’ own feelings about their physical appearance.