SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 32
Question:-
A concrete car park structure is shown in the figure you are requested to design the
following elements using BS-8110
 Slab
 Beam denoted by D and E
 A pad footing
 A column
DATA’S:-
1) Finishes of 1 KN/m2
2) Imposed load on slab
Of = [1 +
𝐵
10
] KN/m2
3) Grade of concrete 25 N/mm2
4) Assume self-weight of block
work is 20 KN/m3
5) Bearing pressure of ground
soil 150 KN/m2
6) Cover for slab is 20 mm
7) Cover for beam is 25 mm
8) Cover for footing is 50 mm
WHERE:-
 “A” is a first digit of your
Registration number.
 “B” is a last digit of your
Registration number.
REQUREMENTS:-
 Write your assumption clearly.
 All work are to be under taken individually.
 Submission date is 02/01/2016.
 Late submission will not be accepted.
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:1
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:2
Calculation:-
[My registration number is 41, First digit number (A) = 4,and second digit number (B) = 1]
1) Imposed load on slab = [1 +
𝐵
10
] KN/m2
Solution: - Imposed load on slab (Qk) is = [1 +
1
10
] KN/m2
= [1 + 0.1] KN/m2
= 1.1 KN/m2
2) Car Park Width is = [2.4 +
𝐴
10
] m
Solution: - Car Park Width is = [2.4 +
4
10
] m
= [2.4 + 0.4] m
= 2.8 m
[This design calculation Assume the finishes load only consider the slab]
 Symbols:-
𝑓𝑦 – Characteristic strength of reinforcement
𝑓𝑦𝑣 – Characteristic strength of links
𝑓𝑐𝑢 – Characteristic strength of concrete
𝛾 𝑚 – Partial safety factor for strength of materials
𝑑 – Effective depth of the tension reinforcement
𝐴 𝑆 – Area of the tension reinforcement
𝐴 𝑆𝑉 – Total cross-section of links at the neutral axis
𝑏 – Width or Effective width of the section
𝐴 𝑆𝐶 – Area of vertical reinforcement
𝐺 𝑘 – Characteristic dead load
𝑄 𝑘 – Characteristic Imposed load
𝑙 𝑥 – Length of shorter side
𝑙 𝑦 – Length of longer side
𝑙 – Span of the beam
𝐻 – High yields steel
𝑀 – Design ultimate moment
𝑉 – Design shear force due to ultimate loads
 𝑐 – Design concrete shear stress
 – Design shear stress at a cross-section
𝑁 – Design axial force
𝑆 𝑉 – Spacing of links along the member
𝑐 – Column width
𝑙 𝐶 – Half the spacing between column centers
𝐴 𝐶 – Area of the concrete section
𝑓𝑆 – Estimated design service stress in the
tension reinforcement
𝑙 𝑂 – Clear height between end restraints
ℎ – Overall depth of the cross-section of a R/F
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:3
REINFORCEMENT
SLAB
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1, SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.5[Solid slabs supported by
beams or walls]
h
d
c
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:4
 Design of a reinforced roof slab ( BS 8110 )
A reinforced concrete roof subject to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2 spans between
walls as shown below. Design the roof for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for slab is 20mm.
[Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel
(Φ) = 10 mm and Assume this slab is simply supported but normal condition is fixed
support]
a) ANALYSIS
The car park area is 2800 mm x 6000 mm, so 𝑙 𝑥 = 2800 mm and 𝑙 𝑦 = 6000 mm
𝑙 𝑦
𝑙 𝑥
=
6000
2800
= 2.143 > 2, Hence this slab is one-way spanning slab.
b) DEPTH OF SLAB
[Assume the modification factor is 1.5]
Minimum effective depth, dmin =
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
=
2800
20 ×1.5
= 93.333 mm
Hence, assume effective depth of slab (d) = 95 mm.
Overall depth of slab (h) = d + /2 + c
= 95 + 10/2 + 20
= 120 mm
c) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120m × 24 kNm−3 = 2.880 KNm−2
Finishes = 1 KNm-2
Total Dead load (Gk) = 2.880 + 1 = 3.880 KNm-2
225 mm
2800 mm

(Basic ratio from table
3.9,BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:5  Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.1 KNm−2
 Ultimate design load
(For 1 m width of slab total ultimate load), W, is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) x width of slab × span
= (1.4 × 3.880 + 1.6 × 1.1) x 1 × 2.80
= 20.138 KN
d) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
20.138 𝐾𝑁 ×2.80 𝑚
8
= 7.048 KNm
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156 𝑓𝑐𝑢bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 1 m x 952 mm2
= 35.197 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
e) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
7.048 × 106
25 ×1000 ×952 = 0.031
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 95 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.031
0.9⁄ ]
= 95 [ 0.964 ] mm = 91.607 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
7.048 × 106
0.95 ×460 ×90.25
= 178.705 mm2/m
 Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 1000 x 120 = 156 mm2/m < As
Width of slab
(Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110)
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter bars spaced at
300 mm
 H10 @ 300 mm centers (As = 262mm2/m).
f) ACTUAL MODIFICATION FACTOR
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× 460 ×
178.705
262.00
= 209.171 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−209.171)
120 × [0.9+
7.048 ×106
1000 ×952 ]
= 0.55 +
267.829
120 × [0.9+ 0.781]
= 0.55 + 1.328
= 1.878 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.
 Hence, New dmin =
𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟
=
2800
20 ×1.878
= 74.547 mm < assume d = 95 mm
Therefore take d = 95 mm and provide H10 @ 300 mm Centers as main steel.
g) SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT
This is one way-spanning slab, hence secondary reinforcement Based on minimum steel
area = 156 mm2/m. Assume secondary reinforcement diameter () 8 mm.
Hence from using steel area tables, provide H8 @ 300 mm Centre’s (As = 168 mm2/m).
(Note that the condition 𝛽 𝑏 ≤ 1does not apply hear)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:6
d=95 mm
h) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
2800
95
= 29.474
 Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
= Basic ratio x modification factor
= 20 x 1.878
= 37.560
Hence Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
< Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
Hence defection check is satisfy.
i) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Since slab is symmetrically loaded
RA = RB =
𝑊
2
=
20.138
2
= 10.069 KN
 Ultimate shear force (V ) = 10.069 KN
And design shear stress, is
 =
𝑉
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
10.069 × 103
1000 × 95
= 0.106 Nmm-2
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = 0.79 {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
c = 0.79 {
100 ×262
1000 × 95
}
1
3⁄
(
400
95
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 ×0.6509 ×1.4325
1.25
= 0.7366 Nmm-2
From Table 3.16 for BS-8110, since  < c, no shear reinforcement is required.
Main steel
Secondary steel
RBRA 2800 mm
W
V
V
(c from table 3.8,BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:7
j) REINFORCEMENT DETAILS
k) CHECK SPACING BETWEEN BARS
Maximum spacing between bars should not exceed the lesser of 3d (= 285 mm) or
750 mm. Actual spacing = 300 mm main steel and 300 mm secondary steel. OK.
l) MAXIMUM CRACK WITH
Since the slab depth does not exceed 200 mm, the above spacing between bars will
automatically ensure that the maximum permissible crack width of 0.3 mm will not be
exceeded.
(from clause 3.12.11.2.7,BS-
88110)
(from clause 3.12.11.2.1,BS-
88110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:8
REINFORCEMENT
BEAM
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.4 [ Beams ]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:9
 Design of a reinforced beam ( BS 8110 )
A reinforced concrete roof slab to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2, self-weight of block
work is 20 KN/m3. Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for beam is 25 mm.
[Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2]
Figure of the one-way spanning slab load distribution as shown above. It is supported
by beams in only 2 sides, so beam-D is load distribution beam and beam-E is non load
distribution beam
Design of a beam - D
D – Beam as shown below:
a) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 3.7080 KNm−1
Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 24 KNm−3 = 2.70 KNm−1
Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 1.2875 KNm−1
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1
Total Dead load (Gk) = 3.708 + 2.70 + 1.2875 + 2.50 = 10.1955 KNm-1
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 1.1 KNm−2 = 1.4163 KNm-1
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span
= (1.4 × 10.1955 + 1.6 × 1.4163) × 6.0 m
= 99.2387 KN
Beam - D
Beam- E
225 mm
6000 mm
h=500 mm
b=225 mm
SECTION OF BEAM
Load distribution
Direction
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:10
b) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
99.2387 × 6.0
8
= 74.4290 KNm
c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH
 Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 20 mm
 Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 8 mm
 Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm.
d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2
= 500 − 25 − 8 − 20/2 = 457 mm
d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 4572 mm2
= 183.265 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
e) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
74.4290 × 106
25 × 225 × 4572 = 0.0634
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 457 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0634
0.9⁄ ]
= 457 [ 1.0661 ] mm = 487.1977 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 434.150 mm)
Hence Z = 420.2828 mm
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
74.4290 × 106
0.95 ×460 ×420.2828
= 405.2464 mm2
 Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 500 = 146.250 mm2 < As
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 20 mm diameter 2 bars .
 2H20 (As = 628 mm2)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:11
Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110)
The above calculations were based on an effective span of
6 m, but this needs to be confirmed. For a simply
supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of
(1) The distance between centers of bearings, A, or
(2) The clear distance between supports, D, plus the effective depth, d, of the beam
 Clear distance between supports = 6000 mm – 225 mm = 5775 mm
 Clear distance + effective depth = 5775 mm + 457 mm = 6232 mm
Assumed span length of 6 m is correct.
f) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
6000
457
= 13.129
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× ×
405.2464
628.00
= 197.8910 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−197.8910)
120 × [0.9+
74.4290 ×106
225 × 4572 ]
= 0.55 +
279.1090
120 × [0.9+ 1.5839]
= 0.55 + 0.9364
= 1.4864 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.
 Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
= Basic ratio x modification factor
= 20 x 1.4864
= 29.7279
Hence Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
< Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110.
460
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:12
g) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Ultimate design load W = 104.093 KN
Since beam is symmetrically loaded
RA = RB =
𝑊
2
=
99.2387
2
= 49.6194 KN
 Ultimate shear force (V ) = 49.6194 KN
And shear stress, is
 =
𝑉
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
49.6194 × 103
225 × 457
= 0.4826 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢
h) SPACING OF LINKS
All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear
force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face
 Calculate the design shear force
𝑉 𝑑
3000−𝑑
=
𝑉
3000
𝑉 𝑑
3000−457
=
49.6194
3000
Vdesign = 42.0607 KN
 Calculate the design shear stress, d is
d =
𝑉 𝑑
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
42.0607 × 103
225 × 457
= 0.4091 Nmm-2
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
c = {
100 ×628
225× 457
}
1
3⁄
(
400
457
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 × 0.8484 ×0.9672
1.25
= 0.5186 Nmm-2
RBRA 6000 mm
W
V
V
[= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2
]
VVdd
V Vdesing
3000 mm
0.79
0.79
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:13
 0.5c = 0.5 x 0.5186 = 0.2593 Nmm-2
 c + 0.4 = 0.5186 + 0.4 = 0.9186 Nmm-2
Hence, 0.5 𝑐 <  𝑑 < (  𝑐 + 0.4 )
Design links required according to
𝐴 𝑠𝑣 ≥
0.4 𝑏 𝑣 𝑆 𝑣
0.95 𝑓𝑦𝑣
[Diameter of link 8 mm and 𝑓𝑦𝑣 = 250 Nmm-2]
 𝐴 𝑠𝑣 = 2 ×
𝜋
4
× 𝑑2
= 2 ×
𝜋
4
× 82
= 100.531 mm2
Hence 100.531 ≥ 0.4 × 225 × 𝑆 𝑣
0.95 ×250
𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 100.531 ×0.95 ×250
0.4 ×225
𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 265.29 mm
Maximum spacing of links is 0.75d = 0.75 × 457 = 342.75 mm. Hence provide H8
links at 200 mm centers.
i) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “D”
(from Table 3.7 ,BS-88110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:14
Design of a beam - E
E – Beam as shown below:
Self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3.
Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and
cover for beam is 25 mm. [Assuming the
following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250
Nmm-2 ]
a) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.300 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.62 KNm−1
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1
Total Dead load (Gk) = 1.62 + 2.50 = 4.120 KNm-1
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span
= (1.4 × 4.120 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m
= 16.15 KN
b) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
16.15 ×2.8
8
= 5.653 KNm
c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH
 Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm
 Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm
225 mm
2800 mm
h=300 mm
b=225 mm
SECTION OF BEAM
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:15
 Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm.
d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2
= 300 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 264 mm
d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 2642 mm2
= 61.158 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
e) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
5.653 × 106
25 ×225 ×2642 = 0.014419
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 264 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.014419
0.9⁄ ]
= 264 [ 0.9837 ] mm = 259.6968 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
5.633 × 106
0.95 ×250 ×250.80
= 138.216 mm2
 Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 300 = 162.00 mm2 > As
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars .
 3H10 (As = 236 mm2)
Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110)
The above calculations were based on an effective span of 2.8 m, but this needs to be
confirmed. For a simply supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of
(Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:16
 Clear distance between supports = 2800 mm – 225 mm = 2575 mm
 Clear distance + effective depth = 2575 mm + 264 mm = 2839 mm
Assumed span length of 2.8 m is correct.
f) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
2800
264
= 10.6061
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× ×
138.216
236.00
= 97.6102 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−97.6102)
120 × [0.9+
5.653 ×106
225 × 2642]
= 0.55 +
379.3898
120 × [0.9+ 0.3605]
= 0.55 + 2.5082
= 3.0582 > 2 , This factor not satisfy for this case.
Hence,
This beam cross-section (225 mm x 300 mm) is not satisfy for this load distribution
So we can change the dimension, assume this cross-section and again design the
beam-E
 Cross-section = 225 mm x 180 mm
g) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.180 m x 24 KNm−3 = 0.972 KNm−1
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1
Total Dead load (Gk) = 0.972 + 2.50 = 3.472 KNm-1
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00
250
h=180 mm
b=225 mm
SECTION OF BEAM
(Table 3.10 for BS-8110)
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:17
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span
= (1.4 × 3.472 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m
= 13.610 KN
h) MOMENT
 Design moment (M) =
𝑊 ×𝐿
8
=
13.610 × 2.8
8
= 4.7646 KNm
i) EFFECTIVE DEPTH
 Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm
 Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm
 Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm.
d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2
= 180 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 144 mm
j) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 1442 mm2
= 18.1958 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
k) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
4.7646 × 106
25 ×225 ×1442 = 0.040849
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 144 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.040849
0.9⁄ ]
= 144 [ 0.9523 ] mm = 137.1371 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
4.7646 × 106
0.95 ×250 ×136.80
= 146.6482 mm2
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:18
 Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 180 = 97.20 mm2 < As
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 2 bars .
 2H10 (As = 157.00 mm2)
l) DEFLECTION
 Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
=
2800
144
= 19.4444
 Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 =
2
3
× 𝑓𝑦 ×
𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞
𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣
=
2
3
× ×
146.6482
157
= 155.6775 Nmm-2
 Modification factor = 0.55 +
(477 − 𝑓𝑠)
120 × [0.9 +
𝑀
𝑏𝑑2]
= 0.55 +
(477−155.6775)
120 × [0.9+
4.7646 ×106
225 × 1442 ]
= 0.55 +
321.3225
120 × [0.9+ 1.0212]
= 0.55 + 1.3937
= 1.9437 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.
 Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
= Basic ratio x modification factor
= 20 x 1.9437
= 38.8749
Hence Actual
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
< Permissible
𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ
The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110.
j) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Ultimate design load W = 12.9752 KN
Since beam is symmetrically loaded
RA = RB =
𝑊
2
=
13.610
2
= 6.8050 KN
250
RBRA 2800 mm
W
V
V
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:19
 Ultimate shear force (V ) = 6.8050 KN
And shear stress, is
 =
𝑉
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
6.8050 × 103
225 × 144
= 0.2100 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢
k) SPACING OF LINKS
All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear
force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face
 Calculate the design shear force
𝑉 𝑑
1400−𝑑
=
𝑉
1400
𝑉 𝑑
1400−144
=
6.8050
1400
Vdesign = 6.1051 KN
 Calculate the design shear stress, d is
d =
𝑉 𝑑
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
=
6.1051 × 103
225 × 144
= 0.1884 Nmm-2
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
c = {
100 ×157
225× 144
}
1
3⁄
(
400
144
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 × 0.7854 ×1.2910
1.25
= 0.6408 Nmm-2
 0.5c = 0.5 x 0.6408 = 0.3204Nmm-2
design < 0.5c , shear reinforcement may not be necessary.
l) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “E”
[= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2
]
V
Vdd
V Vd
1400 mm
0.79
0.79
C–25mm
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:20
REINFORCEMENT
BASES
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.11 [ Bases ]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:21
 Design of a reinforced foundation ( BS 8110 )
A 225 mm square column carries a load transmit to foundation, safe bearing capacity
of the soil is 150 KNm-2. Design a square pad footing to resist the load.𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2
[Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250 Nmm-2]
a) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN
Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN
Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN
Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN
Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN
Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250
= 38.9746 KN
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk)
= (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894)
= 61.1075 KN
 Serviceability load
Design axial load =
𝑈𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑
1.45
= 61.1075
1.45
= 42.1431 KN.
Beam - D
Beam- E
Design
Area
3.0 m
1.4 m
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:22
 Total weight
Total weight including footing weight = Serviceability load + 8% of Axial load
= 42.1431 +
8 ×42.1431
100
= 45.5145 KN.
b) PLAN AREA
Plan area of base =
𝑁
𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙
=
45.5145
150
= 0.3034 m2 = 303430.00 mm2
Hence provide a 600 mm square base (plan area 0.36 m2)
c) SELF-WEIGHT OF FOOTING
[Assume the overall depth of footing (h) = 150 mm]
 Self-weight of footing = Area x h x density of concrete
= 0.36 x 0.15 x 24 KNm-3
= 1.296 KN
 Actual total load = 42.1431 + 1.296 = 43.4391 KN
 Actual earth pressure (Ps) =
𝑊
𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒
=
43.4391
0.36
= 120.6642 KNm-2
Ps < Bearing capacity of soil
d) DESIGN MOMENT
 Total ultimate load (W) = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk
= 61.1075 KN
 Earth pressure (Pe) =
Ultimate load
Area
=
61.1075
0.36
= 169.7431 KNm-2
0.1875 m 0.1875 m
0.225 m
168.9317 KNm-2
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:23
davg
cover
Φ
 Maximum design moment (M) = Resultant force x length
(Occurs at face of column) = ( 169.7431 x 0.6 x 0.1875 ) x
0.1875
2
= 19.0961 x 0.0938
= 1.7912 KNm
e) ULTIMATE MOMENT
Base to be cast against blinding, hence cover (c) to reinforcement = 50 mm (Assume
10 mm diameter (Φ) bars will be needed as bending reinforcement in both directions.
Hence, average effective depth of reinforcement, davg is
 davg = h – cover – Φ
= 150 – 50 – 10
= 90 mm
 Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2
= 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.6 m x 902 mm2
= 18.9540 KNm
Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required.
f) MAIN STEEL
 K =
𝑀
𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 =
1.7912 × 106
25 ×600 × 902 = 0.0147
 Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾
0.9⁄ ]
= 90 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0147
0.9⁄ ]
= 90 [ 0.9834 ] mm = 88.5052 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm)
Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm)
 As =
𝑀
0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍
=
1.7912 × 106
0.95 ×250 × 85.5
= 88.2093 mm2
 Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 600 x 150 = 216.00 mm2 > As
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:24
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars.
 3H10 (As = 236 mm2)
g) DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENT (See clause 3.11.3.2, BS 8110)
 𝑙 𝑐 = 600/2 = 300 mm

3𝑐
4
+
9𝑑
4
=
3 × 225
4
+
9 ×90
4
= 371.25 mm
 𝑙 𝑐 <
3𝑐
4
+
9𝑑
4
Hence, provide 3H10 (As = 236 mm2) distributed uniformly across the full width of the
footing parallel to the x–x and y–y axis.
h) PUNCH SHEAR
 Critical perimeter, pcrit, is
[ pcrit = column perimeter + 8 × 1.5d ] OR [ pcrit = 4 ( 225 + 3d ) ]
pcrit = ( 4 x 225 ) + ( 8 x 1.5 x 90 )
= 1980 mm
 Area within perimeter is = ( 225 + 3d )2
= ( 225 + 3 x 90 )2
= 0.2450 x 106 mm2
 Ultimate punching force, V, is
V = load on shaded area
= 169.7431 × ( 0.36 – 0.245) = 19.5205 KN
 Design punching shear stress,  , is
 =
𝑉
𝑃 𝑐𝑟𝑖 ×𝑑
=
19.5205 ×103
1980 ×90
= 0.1095 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢
 Design concrete shear stress, c
c = {
100 𝐴𝑠
𝑏 𝑣 𝑑
}
1
3⁄
(
400
𝑑
)
1
4⁄
𝛾 𝑚
1.5d
225 + 3d
0.79
[= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2
]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:25
c = {
100 ×88.2093
600 × 90
}
1
3⁄
(
400
90
)
1
4⁄
1.25
c =
0.79 × 0.5466 ×1.4520
1.25
= 0.5016 Nmm-2
Since c >  , punching failure is unlikely and a 150 mm depth of slab is acceptable.
i) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the foundation
0.79
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:26
REINFORCEMENT
COLUMN
BS 8110 : 1997
PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.8 [ Columns ]
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:27
 Design of a reinforced column ( BS 8110 )
A column may be considered to be unbraced if the lateral loads are resisted by the
sway action of the column [Assume this is unbraced column]
a) CLASSIFICATION OF A CONCRETE COLUMN
 For bending in the “Y” direction:
End condition at top of column = 2
End condition at bottom of column = 2
Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βx = 1.5
𝑙 𝑒𝑦
ℎ
=
𝛽 𝑦 𝑙 𝑜
ℎ
=
1.5 × 3320
225
= 22.1333 > 10
 For bending in the “X” direction:
End condition at top of column = 1
End condition at bottom of column = 2
Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βy = 1.3
𝑙 𝑒𝑥
𝑏
=
𝛽𝑥 𝑙 𝑜
𝑏
=
1.3 × 3000
225
= 17.3333 > 10
Since both
𝑙 𝑒𝑥
ℎ
and
𝑙 𝑒𝑦
𝑏
are both greater than 10, the column is SLENDER.
180
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:28
Design the longitudinal steel and links for a 225 mm square, slender-Unbraced column
which supports the following axial loads: 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 [Assuming the following
material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel (Φ)
= 12 mm, diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm]
b) LOADING
 Dead
Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN
Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN
Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN
Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN
Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN
Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN
Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250
= 38.9746 KN
 Imposed
Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN
 Ultimate design load
Total ultimate load, W is
W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk)
= (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894)
= 61.1075 KN
c) LONGITUDINAL STEEL
Since column is axially loaded, use equation 28, BS-8110.
N = 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛 + 0.8 𝑓𝑦 𝐴 𝑠𝑐
61.1075 x 103 = 0.4 x 25 x (2252 - Asc) + 0.8 x 460 x Asc
61107.5 = 506250.0 – 10 Asc + 368 Asc
358 Asc = - 445142.50
Hence, no require for reinforcement steels for this column.
Asc Minimum = 0.13%Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 255 = 65.8125 mm2
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:29
For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given
diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 12 mm diameter 1 bar.
e) SIZE AND MINIMUM NUMBER OF BARS
From clause 3.12.5.3, BS 8110 . Columns with rectangular cross-sections should be
reinforced with a minimum of four longitudinal bars and each of the bars should not be
less than 12 mm in diameter.
 Hence, provide 12 mm diameter 4 bars.
 4H12 (As = 452 mm2)
f) LINKS - (clause 3.12.7, BS 8110)
 Size of links. Links should be at one-quarter of the size of the largest
longitudinal bar or 6 mm, whichever is the greater. That is
=
1
4
× 12 = 3 mm , but not less than 6mm diameter.
 The spacing of the links, is the lesser of
(a) 12 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, that is,
12 × 12 = 144 mm, or
(b) The smallest cross-sectional dimension of the column (= 225 mm).
 Provide H6 links at 125 mm centers.
g) REINFORMATION DETAILS
The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the column
PLAN
SECTION
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:30
CARPARK
ISOMATRIC
VIEW
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:31
[Assumefoundation
Depthfromground
Level=600mm]
255
0
THANK YOU
P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:32

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM Pavan Kumar
 
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concrete
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concreteAnalysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concrete
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concreteSurat Construction PVT LTD
 
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements 2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements shielaBalanta2
 
Doubly reinforced beams...PRC-I
Doubly reinforced beams...PRC-IDoubly reinforced beams...PRC-I
Doubly reinforced beams...PRC-IIrfan Malik
 
Ductile detailing IS 13920
Ductile detailing IS 13920Ductile detailing IS 13920
Ductile detailing IS 13920INTEZAAR ALAM
 
Design of compression members
Design of compression membersDesign of compression members
Design of compression membersSabna Thilakan
 
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2saibabu48
 
My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)
My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)
My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)Abhilash Chandra Dey
 
Design of tension members
Design of tension membersDesign of tension members
Design of tension membersSabna Thilakan
 
Rcc member design steps
Rcc member design stepsRcc member design steps
Rcc member design stepsDYPCET
 
Axially loaded columns
Axially loaded columnsAxially loaded columns
Axially loaded columnsYash Patel
 
Steel Plate Girder Bridge Design
Steel Plate Girder Bridge DesignSteel Plate Girder Bridge Design
Steel Plate Girder Bridge DesignVenkatesh A
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Losses in prestressed concrete
Losses in prestressed concreteLosses in prestressed concrete
Losses in prestressed concrete
 
Bs8110 design notes
Bs8110 design notesBs8110 design notes
Bs8110 design notes
 
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
SINGLY REINFORCED BEAM
 
Bridge loading
Bridge loadingBridge loading
Bridge loading
 
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concrete
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concreteAnalysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concrete
Analysis and design of a multi storey reinforced concrete
 
Ch 7 design of rcc footing
Ch 7 design of rcc footingCh 7 design of rcc footing
Ch 7 design of rcc footing
 
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements 2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
2 marks Question with Answer for Design of Reinforced Cement Concrete Elements
 
Doubly reinforced beams...PRC-I
Doubly reinforced beams...PRC-IDoubly reinforced beams...PRC-I
Doubly reinforced beams...PRC-I
 
Ductile detailing IS 13920
Ductile detailing IS 13920Ductile detailing IS 13920
Ductile detailing IS 13920
 
Design of steel beams
Design of steel beamsDesign of steel beams
Design of steel beams
 
Reinforced slab
Reinforced slabReinforced slab
Reinforced slab
 
Design of compression members
Design of compression membersDesign of compression members
Design of compression members
 
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
Iii design-of-steel-structures-unit-2
 
Prestressed Concrete Design
Prestressed Concrete DesignPrestressed Concrete Design
Prestressed Concrete Design
 
My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)
My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)
My project work(analysis and design of g+3 building)
 
Design of tension members
Design of tension membersDesign of tension members
Design of tension members
 
Rcc member design steps
Rcc member design stepsRcc member design steps
Rcc member design steps
 
Lecture 1 design loads
Lecture 1   design loadsLecture 1   design loads
Lecture 1 design loads
 
Axially loaded columns
Axially loaded columnsAxially loaded columns
Axially loaded columns
 
Steel Plate Girder Bridge Design
Steel Plate Girder Bridge DesignSteel Plate Girder Bridge Design
Steel Plate Girder Bridge Design
 

Ähnlich wie Structural Design

onw way slab design
onw way slab designonw way slab design
onw way slab designPalak Patel
 
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxDP NITHIN
 
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET Journal
 
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumDesign of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumIRJET Journal
 
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...IRJET Journal
 
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowAnchit Agrawal
 
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODECOMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODEIRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET Journal
 
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdfChap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdfAberaMamoJaleta
 
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxsubhashini214160
 
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank designHarish Mahavar
 
final internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptxfinal internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptxKiranKr32
 
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptxNew Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptxRajeshKumar25548
 
Design of Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
Design of  Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity WallDesign of  Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
Design of Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity WallIRJET Journal
 
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of DesignCost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of DesignIJERA Editor
 
Design and analysis of school building
Design and analysis of school buildingDesign and analysis of school building
Design and analysis of school buildingRaghav Sankar
 
Isolated footing design
Isolated footing designIsolated footing design
Isolated footing designsrinu_anduri
 
Design of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingArun Kurali
 

Ähnlich wie Structural Design (20)

onw way slab design
onw way slab designonw way slab design
onw way slab design
 
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptxAnalysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
 
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute BuildingIRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
IRJET - Design and Analysis of Residential Institute Building
 
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an AuditoriumDesign of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
Design of Steel Grillage Foundation for an Auditorium
 
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
Analysis, Design, and Estimation of Multi-Storied Institutional Building by u...
 
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknowStructural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
Structural design of 350 kl overhead water tank at telibagh,lucknow
 
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODECOMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
COMPARISON BETWEEN VARIOUS STEEL SECTION BY USING IS CODE AND EURO CODE
 
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
 
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdfChap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf
Chap-5-T-Girder Example-1.pdf
 
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
 
SANDIN.pptx
SANDIN.pptxSANDIN.pptx
SANDIN.pptx
 
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design350 kl overhead water intze tank design
350 kl overhead water intze tank design
 
final internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptxfinal internship ppt.pptx
final internship ppt.pptx
 
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptxNew Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
 
Design of Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
Design of  Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity WallDesign of  Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
Design of Bioclimatic Structure with Insulation of Cavity Wall
 
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of DesignCost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of Design
 
Design and analysis of school building
Design and analysis of school buildingDesign and analysis of school building
Design and analysis of school building
 
Isolated footing design
Isolated footing designIsolated footing design
Isolated footing design
 
Design of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footingDesign of RCC Column footing
Design of RCC Column footing
 
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTUREDESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
DESIGN OF STEEL STRUCTURE
 

Mehr von Vj NiroSh

BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District Vj NiroSh
 
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District Vj NiroSh
 
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopyIrranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopyVj NiroSh
 
Vechile shed Sample Drawing
Vechile shed Sample DrawingVechile shed Sample Drawing
Vechile shed Sample DrawingVj NiroSh
 
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete PracticeCONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete PracticeVj NiroSh
 
Palimentory control in Tamil
Palimentory control in Tamil Palimentory control in Tamil
Palimentory control in Tamil Vj NiroSh
 
Document for Handing over the building
Document for Handing over the buildingDocument for Handing over the building
Document for Handing over the buildingVj NiroSh
 
BSR - 2020 With OH&P
BSR - 2020 With OH&PBSR - 2020 With OH&P
BSR - 2020 With OH&PVj NiroSh
 
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All DepartmentSchedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All DepartmentVj NiroSh
 
Auto CAD - 2D
Auto CAD - 2DAuto CAD - 2D
Auto CAD - 2DVj NiroSh
 
Adobe Photoshop- in Tamil
Adobe Photoshop- in TamilAdobe Photoshop- in Tamil
Adobe Photoshop- in TamilVj NiroSh
 
ATI Final Report
ATI Final ReportATI Final Report
ATI Final ReportVj NiroSh
 
Windows XP in தமிழ்
Windows XP in தமிழ் Windows XP in தமிழ்
Windows XP in தமிழ் Vj NiroSh
 
Builders of Quantity
Builders of QuantityBuilders of Quantity
Builders of QuantityVj NiroSh
 
General notes to building schedule of rates
General notes to building schedule of ratesGeneral notes to building schedule of rates
General notes to building schedule of ratesVj NiroSh
 
AutoCAD - 3D Notes
AutoCAD - 3D NotesAutoCAD - 3D Notes
AutoCAD - 3D NotesVj NiroSh
 
Industrial Training Report
Industrial Training ReportIndustrial Training Report
Industrial Training ReportVj NiroSh
 
SBD - 3 - ICTAD
SBD - 3 - ICTADSBD - 3 - ICTAD
SBD - 3 - ICTADVj NiroSh
 
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consulScope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consulVj NiroSh
 
Contract payment and variation
Contract payment and variationContract payment and variation
Contract payment and variationVj NiroSh
 

Mehr von Vj NiroSh (20)

BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
BSR - 2021 - Mullaitivu - District
 
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
BSR - 2021 - Kiliinochchi - District
 
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopyIrranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
Irranaitivu R.C.T.M.S-Drawing file (Ori)_NoCopy
 
Vechile shed Sample Drawing
Vechile shed Sample DrawingVechile shed Sample Drawing
Vechile shed Sample Drawing
 
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete PracticeCONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
CONCRETE BASICS A Guide to Concrete Practice
 
Palimentory control in Tamil
Palimentory control in Tamil Palimentory control in Tamil
Palimentory control in Tamil
 
Document for Handing over the building
Document for Handing over the buildingDocument for Handing over the building
Document for Handing over the building
 
BSR - 2020 With OH&P
BSR - 2020 With OH&PBSR - 2020 With OH&P
BSR - 2020 With OH&P
 
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All DepartmentSchedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
Schedule of Rates - 2020 All Department
 
Auto CAD - 2D
Auto CAD - 2DAuto CAD - 2D
Auto CAD - 2D
 
Adobe Photoshop- in Tamil
Adobe Photoshop- in TamilAdobe Photoshop- in Tamil
Adobe Photoshop- in Tamil
 
ATI Final Report
ATI Final ReportATI Final Report
ATI Final Report
 
Windows XP in தமிழ்
Windows XP in தமிழ் Windows XP in தமிழ்
Windows XP in தமிழ்
 
Builders of Quantity
Builders of QuantityBuilders of Quantity
Builders of Quantity
 
General notes to building schedule of rates
General notes to building schedule of ratesGeneral notes to building schedule of rates
General notes to building schedule of rates
 
AutoCAD - 3D Notes
AutoCAD - 3D NotesAutoCAD - 3D Notes
AutoCAD - 3D Notes
 
Industrial Training Report
Industrial Training ReportIndustrial Training Report
Industrial Training Report
 
SBD - 3 - ICTAD
SBD - 3 - ICTADSBD - 3 - ICTAD
SBD - 3 - ICTAD
 
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consulScope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
Scope of consultancy services - ICTAD - consul
 
Contract payment and variation
Contract payment and variationContract payment and variation
Contract payment and variation
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptxHOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptxSCMS School of Architecture
 
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech studentsAIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech studentsvanyagupta248
 
1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf
1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf
1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdfAldoGarca30
 
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueBhangaleSonal
 
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna MunicipalityA Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna MunicipalityMorshed Ahmed Rahath
 
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxOrlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxMuhammadAsimMuhammad6
 
Moment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
Moment Distribution Method For Btech CivilMoment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
Moment Distribution Method For Btech CivilVinayVitekari
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTbhaskargani46
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Kamal Acharya
 
Verification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptx
Verification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptxVerification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptx
Verification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptxchumtiyababu
 
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.pptBlock diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.pptNANDHAKUMARA10
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXssuser89054b
 
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and propertiesPE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and propertiessarkmank1
 
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best ServiceTamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Servicemeghakumariji156
 
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptxWork-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptxJuliansyahHarahap1
 
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equationDC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equationBhangaleSonal
 
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...Amil baba
 
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startDesign For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startQuintin Balsdon
 
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...drmkjayanthikannan
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptxHOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
HOA1&2 - Module 3 - PREHISTORCI ARCHITECTURE OF KERALA.pptx
 
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech studentsAIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
AIRCANVAS[1].pdf mini project for btech students
 
1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf
1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf
1_Introduction + EAM Vocabulary + how to navigate in EAM.pdf
 
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torqueDouble Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
Double Revolving field theory-how the rotor develops torque
 
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna MunicipalityA Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
A Study of Urban Area Plan for Pabna Municipality
 
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptxOrlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
Orlando’s Arnold Palmer Hospital Layout Strategy-1.pptx
 
Moment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
Moment Distribution Method For Btech CivilMoment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
Moment Distribution Method For Btech Civil
 
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPTGenerative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
Generative AI or GenAI technology based PPT
 
Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.Employee leave management system project.
Employee leave management system project.
 
Verification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptx
Verification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptxVerification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptx
Verification of thevenin's theorem for BEEE Lab (1).pptx
 
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak HamilCara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
Cara Menggugurkan Sperma Yang Masuk Rahim Biyar Tidak Hamil
 
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.pptBlock diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
Block diagram reduction techniques in control systems.ppt
 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and propertiesPE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
PE 459 LECTURE 2- natural gas basic concepts and properties
 
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best ServiceTamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
Tamil Call Girls Bhayandar WhatsApp +91-9930687706, Best Service
 
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptxWork-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
Work-Permit-Receiver-in-Saudi-Aramco.pptx
 
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equationDC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
DC MACHINE-Motoring and generation, Armature circuit equation
 
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
NO1 Top No1 Amil Baba In Azad Kashmir, Kashmir Black Magic Specialist Expert ...
 
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the startDesign For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
Design For Accessibility: Getting it right from the start
 
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
Unit 4_Part 1 CSE2001 Exception Handling and Function Template and Class Temp...
 

Structural Design

  • 1. Question:- A concrete car park structure is shown in the figure you are requested to design the following elements using BS-8110  Slab  Beam denoted by D and E  A pad footing  A column DATA’S:- 1) Finishes of 1 KN/m2 2) Imposed load on slab Of = [1 + 𝐵 10 ] KN/m2 3) Grade of concrete 25 N/mm2 4) Assume self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3 5) Bearing pressure of ground soil 150 KN/m2 6) Cover for slab is 20 mm 7) Cover for beam is 25 mm 8) Cover for footing is 50 mm WHERE:-  “A” is a first digit of your Registration number.  “B” is a last digit of your Registration number. REQUREMENTS:-  Write your assumption clearly.  All work are to be under taken individually.  Submission date is 02/01/2016.  Late submission will not be accepted. P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:1
  • 2. P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:2 Calculation:- [My registration number is 41, First digit number (A) = 4,and second digit number (B) = 1] 1) Imposed load on slab = [1 + 𝐵 10 ] KN/m2 Solution: - Imposed load on slab (Qk) is = [1 + 1 10 ] KN/m2 = [1 + 0.1] KN/m2 = 1.1 KN/m2 2) Car Park Width is = [2.4 + 𝐴 10 ] m Solution: - Car Park Width is = [2.4 + 4 10 ] m = [2.4 + 0.4] m = 2.8 m [This design calculation Assume the finishes load only consider the slab]  Symbols:- 𝑓𝑦 – Characteristic strength of reinforcement 𝑓𝑦𝑣 – Characteristic strength of links 𝑓𝑐𝑢 – Characteristic strength of concrete 𝛾 𝑚 – Partial safety factor for strength of materials 𝑑 – Effective depth of the tension reinforcement 𝐴 𝑆 – Area of the tension reinforcement 𝐴 𝑆𝑉 – Total cross-section of links at the neutral axis 𝑏 – Width or Effective width of the section 𝐴 𝑆𝐶 – Area of vertical reinforcement 𝐺 𝑘 – Characteristic dead load 𝑄 𝑘 – Characteristic Imposed load 𝑙 𝑥 – Length of shorter side 𝑙 𝑦 – Length of longer side 𝑙 – Span of the beam 𝐻 – High yields steel 𝑀 – Design ultimate moment 𝑉 – Design shear force due to ultimate loads  𝑐 – Design concrete shear stress  – Design shear stress at a cross-section 𝑁 – Design axial force 𝑆 𝑉 – Spacing of links along the member 𝑐 – Column width 𝑙 𝐶 – Half the spacing between column centers 𝐴 𝐶 – Area of the concrete section 𝑓𝑆 – Estimated design service stress in the tension reinforcement 𝑙 𝑂 – Clear height between end restraints ℎ – Overall depth of the cross-section of a R/F
  • 4. h d c P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:4  Design of a reinforced roof slab ( BS 8110 ) A reinforced concrete roof subject to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2 spans between walls as shown below. Design the roof for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for slab is 20mm. [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel (Φ) = 10 mm and Assume this slab is simply supported but normal condition is fixed support] a) ANALYSIS The car park area is 2800 mm x 6000 mm, so 𝑙 𝑥 = 2800 mm and 𝑙 𝑦 = 6000 mm 𝑙 𝑦 𝑙 𝑥 = 6000 2800 = 2.143 > 2, Hence this slab is one-way spanning slab. b) DEPTH OF SLAB [Assume the modification factor is 1.5] Minimum effective depth, dmin = 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 2800 20 ×1.5 = 93.333 mm Hence, assume effective depth of slab (d) = 95 mm. Overall depth of slab (h) = d + /2 + c = 95 + 10/2 + 20 = 120 mm c) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120m × 24 kNm−3 = 2.880 KNm−2 Finishes = 1 KNm-2 Total Dead load (Gk) = 2.880 + 1 = 3.880 KNm-2 225 mm 2800 mm  (Basic ratio from table 3.9,BS-8110)
  • 5. P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:5  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.1 KNm−2  Ultimate design load (For 1 m width of slab total ultimate load), W, is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) x width of slab × span = (1.4 × 3.880 + 1.6 × 1.1) x 1 × 2.80 = 20.138 KN d) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 20.138 𝐾𝑁 ×2.80 𝑚 8 = 7.048 KNm  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156 𝑓𝑐𝑢bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 1 m x 952 mm2 = 35.197 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. e) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 7.048 × 106 25 ×1000 ×952 = 0.031  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 95 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.031 0.9⁄ ] = 95 [ 0.964 ] mm = 91.607 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 90.25 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 7.048 × 106 0.95 ×460 ×90.25 = 178.705 mm2/m  Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 1000 x 120 = 156 mm2/m < As Width of slab (Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110)
  • 6. For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter bars spaced at 300 mm  H10 @ 300 mm centers (As = 262mm2/m). f) ACTUAL MODIFICATION FACTOR  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × 460 × 178.705 262.00 = 209.171 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−209.171) 120 × [0.9+ 7.048 ×106 1000 ×952 ] = 0.55 + 267.829 120 × [0.9+ 0.781] = 0.55 + 1.328 = 1.878 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.  Hence, New dmin = 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑐 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜 ×𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 2800 20 ×1.878 = 74.547 mm < assume d = 95 mm Therefore take d = 95 mm and provide H10 @ 300 mm Centers as main steel. g) SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT This is one way-spanning slab, hence secondary reinforcement Based on minimum steel area = 156 mm2/m. Assume secondary reinforcement diameter () 8 mm. Hence from using steel area tables, provide H8 @ 300 mm Centre’s (As = 168 mm2/m). (Note that the condition 𝛽 𝑏 ≤ 1does not apply hear) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:6
  • 7. d=95 mm h) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 2800 95 = 29.474  Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = Basic ratio x modification factor = 20 x 1.878 = 37.560 Hence Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ < Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ Hence defection check is satisfy. i) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT Since slab is symmetrically loaded RA = RB = 𝑊 2 = 20.138 2 = 10.069 KN  Ultimate shear force (V ) = 10.069 KN And design shear stress, is  = 𝑉 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 10.069 × 103 1000 × 95 = 0.106 Nmm-2  Design concrete shear stress, c c = 0.79 { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 c = 0.79 { 100 ×262 1000 × 95 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 95 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 ×0.6509 ×1.4325 1.25 = 0.7366 Nmm-2 From Table 3.16 for BS-8110, since  < c, no shear reinforcement is required. Main steel Secondary steel RBRA 2800 mm W V V (c from table 3.8,BS-8110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:7
  • 8. j) REINFORCEMENT DETAILS k) CHECK SPACING BETWEEN BARS Maximum spacing between bars should not exceed the lesser of 3d (= 285 mm) or 750 mm. Actual spacing = 300 mm main steel and 300 mm secondary steel. OK. l) MAXIMUM CRACK WITH Since the slab depth does not exceed 200 mm, the above spacing between bars will automatically ensure that the maximum permissible crack width of 0.3 mm will not be exceeded. (from clause 3.12.11.2.7,BS- 88110) (from clause 3.12.11.2.1,BS- 88110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:8
  • 9. REINFORCEMENT BEAM BS 8110 : 1997 PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.4 [ Beams ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:9
  • 10.  Design of a reinforced beam ( BS 8110 ) A reinforced concrete roof slab to an imposed load of 1.1 KNm−2, self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3. Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for beam is 25 mm. [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2] Figure of the one-way spanning slab load distribution as shown above. It is supported by beams in only 2 sides, so beam-D is load distribution beam and beam-E is non load distribution beam Design of a beam - D D – Beam as shown below: a) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 3.7080 KNm−1 Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 24 KNm−3 = 2.70 KNm−1 Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 1.2875 KNm−1 Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1 Total Dead load (Gk) = 3.708 + 2.70 + 1.2875 + 2.50 = 10.1955 KNm-1  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 1.1 KNm−2 = 1.4163 KNm-1  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span = (1.4 × 10.1955 + 1.6 × 1.4163) × 6.0 m = 99.2387 KN Beam - D Beam- E 225 mm 6000 mm h=500 mm b=225 mm SECTION OF BEAM Load distribution Direction P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:10
  • 11. b) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 99.2387 × 6.0 8 = 74.4290 KNm c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH  Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 20 mm  Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 8 mm  Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm. d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2 = 500 − 25 − 8 − 20/2 = 457 mm d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 4572 mm2 = 183.265 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. e) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 74.4290 × 106 25 × 225 × 4572 = 0.0634  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 457 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0634 0.9⁄ ] = 457 [ 1.0661 ] mm = 487.1977 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 434.150 mm) Hence Z = 420.2828 mm  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 74.4290 × 106 0.95 ×460 ×420.2828 = 405.2464 mm2  Asmin = 0.13% Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 500 = 146.250 mm2 < As For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 20 mm diameter 2 bars .  2H20 (As = 628 mm2) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:11
  • 12. Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110) The above calculations were based on an effective span of 6 m, but this needs to be confirmed. For a simply supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of (1) The distance between centers of bearings, A, or (2) The clear distance between supports, D, plus the effective depth, d, of the beam  Clear distance between supports = 6000 mm – 225 mm = 5775 mm  Clear distance + effective depth = 5775 mm + 457 mm = 6232 mm Assumed span length of 6 m is correct. f) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 6000 457 = 13.129  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × × 405.2464 628.00 = 197.8910 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−197.8910) 120 × [0.9+ 74.4290 ×106 225 × 4572 ] = 0.55 + 279.1090 120 × [0.9+ 1.5839] = 0.55 + 0.9364 = 1.4864 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.  Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = Basic ratio x modification factor = 20 x 1.4864 = 29.7279 Hence Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ < Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110. 460 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:12
  • 13. g) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT Ultimate design load W = 104.093 KN Since beam is symmetrically loaded RA = RB = 𝑊 2 = 99.2387 2 = 49.6194 KN  Ultimate shear force (V ) = 49.6194 KN And shear stress, is  = 𝑉 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 49.6194 × 103 225 × 457 = 0.4826 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢 h) SPACING OF LINKS All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face  Calculate the design shear force 𝑉 𝑑 3000−𝑑 = 𝑉 3000 𝑉 𝑑 3000−457 = 49.6194 3000 Vdesign = 42.0607 KN  Calculate the design shear stress, d is d = 𝑉 𝑑 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 42.0607 × 103 225 × 457 = 0.4091 Nmm-2  Design concrete shear stress, c c = { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 c = { 100 ×628 225× 457 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 457 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 × 0.8484 ×0.9672 1.25 = 0.5186 Nmm-2 RBRA 6000 mm W V V [= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2 ] VVdd V Vdesing 3000 mm 0.79 0.79 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:13
  • 14.  0.5c = 0.5 x 0.5186 = 0.2593 Nmm-2  c + 0.4 = 0.5186 + 0.4 = 0.9186 Nmm-2 Hence, 0.5 𝑐 <  𝑑 < (  𝑐 + 0.4 ) Design links required according to 𝐴 𝑠𝑣 ≥ 0.4 𝑏 𝑣 𝑆 𝑣 0.95 𝑓𝑦𝑣 [Diameter of link 8 mm and 𝑓𝑦𝑣 = 250 Nmm-2]  𝐴 𝑠𝑣 = 2 × 𝜋 4 × 𝑑2 = 2 × 𝜋 4 × 82 = 100.531 mm2 Hence 100.531 ≥ 0.4 × 225 × 𝑆 𝑣 0.95 ×250 𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 100.531 ×0.95 ×250 0.4 ×225 𝑆 𝑣 ≤ 265.29 mm Maximum spacing of links is 0.75d = 0.75 × 457 = 342.75 mm. Hence provide H8 links at 200 mm centers. i) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “D” (from Table 3.7 ,BS-88110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:14
  • 15. Design of a beam - E E – Beam as shown below: Self-weight of block work is 20 KN/m3. Design the beam for 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 and cover for beam is 25 mm. [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250 Nmm-2 ] a) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.300 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.62 KNm−1 Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1 Total Dead load (Gk) = 1.62 + 2.50 = 4.120 KNm-1  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span = (1.4 × 4.120 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m = 16.15 KN b) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 16.15 ×2.8 8 = 5.653 KNm c) EFFECTIVE DEPTH  Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm  Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm 225 mm 2800 mm h=300 mm b=225 mm SECTION OF BEAM P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:15
  • 16.  Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm. d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2 = 300 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 264 mm d) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 2642 mm2 = 61.158 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. e) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 5.653 × 106 25 ×225 ×2642 = 0.014419  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 264 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.014419 0.9⁄ ] = 264 [ 0.9837 ] mm = 259.6968 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 250.80 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 5.633 × 106 0.95 ×250 ×250.80 = 138.216 mm2  Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 300 = 162.00 mm2 > As For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars .  3H10 (As = 236 mm2) Effective span (clause 3.4.1.2, BS 8110) The above calculations were based on an effective span of 2.8 m, but this needs to be confirmed. For a simply supported beam this should be taken as the lesser of (Asmin from table 3.25,BS-8110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:16
  • 17.  Clear distance between supports = 2800 mm – 225 mm = 2575 mm  Clear distance + effective depth = 2575 mm + 264 mm = 2839 mm Assumed span length of 2.8 m is correct. f) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 2800 264 = 10.6061  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × × 138.216 236.00 = 97.6102 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−97.6102) 120 × [0.9+ 5.653 ×106 225 × 2642] = 0.55 + 379.3898 120 × [0.9+ 0.3605] = 0.55 + 2.5082 = 3.0582 > 2 , This factor not satisfy for this case. Hence, This beam cross-section (225 mm x 300 mm) is not satisfy for this load distribution So we can change the dimension, assume this cross-section and again design the beam-E  Cross-section = 225 mm x 180 mm g) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of beam = 0.225 m x 0.180 m x 24 KNm−3 = 0.972 KNm−1 Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 20 KNm−3 = 2.50 KNm−1 Total Dead load (Gk) = 0.972 + 2.50 = 3.472 KNm-1  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 0.00 250 h=180 mm b=225 mm SECTION OF BEAM (Table 3.10 for BS-8110) P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:17
  • 18.  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) × span = (1.4 × 3.472 + 1.6 × 0.00) × 2.8 m = 13.610 KN h) MOMENT  Design moment (M) = 𝑊 ×𝐿 8 = 13.610 × 2.8 8 = 4.7646 KNm i) EFFECTIVE DEPTH  Assume diameter of main bars (Φ) = 10 mm  Assume diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm  Cover for beam Δc = 25 mm. d = h − c − Φ′ − Φ/2 = 180 − 25 − 6 − 10/2 = 144 mm j) ULTIMATE MOMENT OF RESISTENT  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.225 m x 1442 mm2 = 18.1958 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. k) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 4.7646 × 106 25 ×225 ×1442 = 0.040849  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 144 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.040849 0.9⁄ ] = 144 [ 0.9523 ] mm = 137.1371 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 136.80 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 4.7646 × 106 0.95 ×250 ×136.80 = 146.6482 mm2 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:18
  • 19.  Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 225 x 180 = 97.20 mm2 < As For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 2 bars .  2H10 (As = 157.00 mm2) l) DEFLECTION  Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 2800 144 = 19.4444  Design services stress, 𝑓𝑠 = 2 3 × 𝑓𝑦 × 𝐴𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞 𝐴𝑠 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑣 = 2 3 × × 146.6482 157 = 155.6775 Nmm-2  Modification factor = 0.55 + (477 − 𝑓𝑠) 120 × [0.9 + 𝑀 𝑏𝑑2] = 0.55 + (477−155.6775) 120 × [0.9+ 4.7646 ×106 225 × 1442 ] = 0.55 + 321.3225 120 × [0.9+ 1.0212] = 0.55 + 1.3937 = 1.9437 < 2 , This factor satisfy for this case.  Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = Basic ratio x modification factor = 20 x 1.9437 = 38.8749 Hence Actual 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ < Permissible 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ The beam therefore satisfies the deflection criteria in BS 8110. j) SHEAR REINFORCEMENT Ultimate design load W = 12.9752 KN Since beam is symmetrically loaded RA = RB = 𝑊 2 = 13.610 2 = 6.8050 KN 250 RBRA 2800 mm W V V P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:19
  • 20.  Ultimate shear force (V ) = 6.8050 KN And shear stress, is  = 𝑉 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 6.8050 × 103 225 × 144 = 0.2100 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢 k) SPACING OF LINKS All through the shear force will be maximum at the face of the support. The design shear force for uniformly distributed load is at the section “d” from the face  Calculate the design shear force 𝑉 𝑑 1400−𝑑 = 𝑉 1400 𝑉 𝑑 1400−144 = 6.8050 1400 Vdesign = 6.1051 KN  Calculate the design shear stress, d is d = 𝑉 𝑑 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 = 6.1051 × 103 225 × 144 = 0.1884 Nmm-2  Design concrete shear stress, c c = { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 c = { 100 ×157 225× 144 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 144 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 × 0.7854 ×1.2910 1.25 = 0.6408 Nmm-2  0.5c = 0.5 x 0.6408 = 0.3204Nmm-2 design < 0.5c , shear reinforcement may not be necessary. l) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the beam “E” [= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2 ] V Vdd V Vd 1400 mm 0.79 0.79 C–25mm P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:20
  • 21. REINFORCEMENT BASES BS 8110 : 1997 PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.11 [ Bases ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:21
  • 22.  Design of a reinforced foundation ( BS 8110 ) A 225 mm square column carries a load transmit to foundation, safe bearing capacity of the soil is 150 KNm-2. Design a square pad footing to resist the load.𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 250 Nmm-2] a) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250 = 38.9746 KN  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) = (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894) = 61.1075 KN  Serviceability load Design axial load = 𝑈𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑 1.45 = 61.1075 1.45 = 42.1431 KN. Beam - D Beam- E Design Area 3.0 m 1.4 m P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:22
  • 23.  Total weight Total weight including footing weight = Serviceability load + 8% of Axial load = 42.1431 + 8 ×42.1431 100 = 45.5145 KN. b) PLAN AREA Plan area of base = 𝑁 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 = 45.5145 150 = 0.3034 m2 = 303430.00 mm2 Hence provide a 600 mm square base (plan area 0.36 m2) c) SELF-WEIGHT OF FOOTING [Assume the overall depth of footing (h) = 150 mm]  Self-weight of footing = Area x h x density of concrete = 0.36 x 0.15 x 24 KNm-3 = 1.296 KN  Actual total load = 42.1431 + 1.296 = 43.4391 KN  Actual earth pressure (Ps) = 𝑊 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 43.4391 0.36 = 120.6642 KNm-2 Ps < Bearing capacity of soil d) DESIGN MOMENT  Total ultimate load (W) = 1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk = 61.1075 KN  Earth pressure (Pe) = Ultimate load Area = 61.1075 0.36 = 169.7431 KNm-2 0.1875 m 0.1875 m 0.225 m 168.9317 KNm-2 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:23
  • 24. davg cover Φ  Maximum design moment (M) = Resultant force x length (Occurs at face of column) = ( 169.7431 x 0.6 x 0.1875 ) x 0.1875 2 = 19.0961 x 0.0938 = 1.7912 KNm e) ULTIMATE MOMENT Base to be cast against blinding, hence cover (c) to reinforcement = 50 mm (Assume 10 mm diameter (Φ) bars will be needed as bending reinforcement in both directions. Hence, average effective depth of reinforcement, davg is  davg = h – cover – Φ = 150 – 50 – 10 = 90 mm  Ultimate design moment (Mu) = 0.156𝑓𝑐𝑢 bd2 = 0.156 x 25 Nmm-2 x 0.6 m x 902 mm2 = 18.9540 KNm Since M < Mu, no compression reinforcement is required. f) MAIN STEEL  K = 𝑀 𝑓 𝑐𝑢 b𝑑2 = 1.7912 × 106 25 ×600 × 902 = 0.0147  Z = 𝑑 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 𝐾 0.9⁄ ] = 90 [ 0.5 + √0.25 − 0.0147 0.9⁄ ] = 90 [ 0.9834 ] mm = 88.5052 mm > 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm) Hence Z = 0.95𝑑 (= 85.50 mm)  As = 𝑀 0.95 × 𝑓𝑦 ×𝑍 = 1.7912 × 106 0.95 ×250 × 85.5 = 88.2093 mm2  Asmin = 0.24% Ac = 0.0024 x 600 x 150 = 216.00 mm2 > As P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:24
  • 25. For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 10 mm diameter 3 bars.  3H10 (As = 236 mm2) g) DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENT (See clause 3.11.3.2, BS 8110)  𝑙 𝑐 = 600/2 = 300 mm  3𝑐 4 + 9𝑑 4 = 3 × 225 4 + 9 ×90 4 = 371.25 mm  𝑙 𝑐 < 3𝑐 4 + 9𝑑 4 Hence, provide 3H10 (As = 236 mm2) distributed uniformly across the full width of the footing parallel to the x–x and y–y axis. h) PUNCH SHEAR  Critical perimeter, pcrit, is [ pcrit = column perimeter + 8 × 1.5d ] OR [ pcrit = 4 ( 225 + 3d ) ] pcrit = ( 4 x 225 ) + ( 8 x 1.5 x 90 ) = 1980 mm  Area within perimeter is = ( 225 + 3d )2 = ( 225 + 3 x 90 )2 = 0.2450 x 106 mm2  Ultimate punching force, V, is V = load on shaded area = 169.7431 × ( 0.36 – 0.245) = 19.5205 KN  Design punching shear stress,  , is  = 𝑉 𝑃 𝑐𝑟𝑖 ×𝑑 = 19.5205 ×103 1980 ×90 = 0.1095 Nmm-2 < Permissible = 0.8√𝑓𝑐𝑢  Design concrete shear stress, c c = { 100 𝐴𝑠 𝑏 𝑣 𝑑 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 𝑑 ) 1 4⁄ 𝛾 𝑚 1.5d 225 + 3d 0.79 [= 0.8√25 = 4 Nmm-2 ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:25
  • 26. c = { 100 ×88.2093 600 × 90 } 1 3⁄ ( 400 90 ) 1 4⁄ 1.25 c = 0.79 × 0.5466 ×1.4520 1.25 = 0.5016 Nmm-2 Since c >  , punching failure is unlikely and a 150 mm depth of slab is acceptable. i) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the foundation 0.79 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:26
  • 27. REINFORCEMENT COLUMN BS 8110 : 1997 PART – 1 , SECTION 3 , CLAUSE 3.8 [ Columns ] P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:27
  • 28.  Design of a reinforced column ( BS 8110 ) A column may be considered to be unbraced if the lateral loads are resisted by the sway action of the column [Assume this is unbraced column] a) CLASSIFICATION OF A CONCRETE COLUMN  For bending in the “Y” direction: End condition at top of column = 2 End condition at bottom of column = 2 Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βx = 1.5 𝑙 𝑒𝑦 ℎ = 𝛽 𝑦 𝑙 𝑜 ℎ = 1.5 × 3320 225 = 22.1333 > 10  For bending in the “X” direction: End condition at top of column = 1 End condition at bottom of column = 2 Hence from Table 3.20,BS-8110, βy = 1.3 𝑙 𝑒𝑥 𝑏 = 𝛽𝑥 𝑙 𝑜 𝑏 = 1.3 × 3000 225 = 17.3333 > 10 Since both 𝑙 𝑒𝑥 ℎ and 𝑙 𝑒𝑦 𝑏 are both greater than 10, the column is SLENDER. 180 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:28
  • 29. Design the longitudinal steel and links for a 225 mm square, slender-Unbraced column which supports the following axial loads: 𝑓𝑐𝑢= 25 Nmm-2 [Assuming the following material strength 𝑓𝑦 = 460 Nmm-2 and 𝑓𝑦𝑣= 250 Nmm-2 and Diameter of main steel (Φ) = 12 mm, diameter of links (Φ′) = 6 mm] b) LOADING  Dead Self-weight of slab = 0.120 m x 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 10.7069 KN Self-weight of beam-E = 0.225 m x 0.180 x 1.2875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 1.2515 KN Self-weight of beam-D = 0.225 m x 0.500 m x 2.8875 m x 24 KNm−3 = 7.796 KN Self-weight of column = 0.225 m x 0.225 m x 3.5 m x 24 KNm−3 = 4.2525 KN Finishes of slab = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1 KNm-2 = 3.7177 KN Block wall load = 0.125 m x 1.00 m x 4.50 m x 20 KNm−3 = 11.250 KN Total Dead load (Gk) = 10.7069 + 1.2515 + 7.796 + 4.2525 + 3.7177 + 11.250 = 38.9746 KN  Imposed Total imposed load (Qk) = 1.2875 m x 2.8875 m x 1.1 kNm−2 = 4.0894 KN  Ultimate design load Total ultimate load, W is W = (1.4 Gk + 1.6 Qk) = (1.4 × 38.9746 + 1.6 × 4.0894) = 61.1075 KN c) LONGITUDINAL STEEL Since column is axially loaded, use equation 28, BS-8110. N = 0.4 𝑓𝑐𝑢 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛 + 0.8 𝑓𝑦 𝐴 𝑠𝑐 61.1075 x 103 = 0.4 x 25 x (2252 - Asc) + 0.8 x 460 x Asc 61107.5 = 506250.0 – 10 Asc + 368 Asc 358 Asc = - 445142.50 Hence, no require for reinforcement steels for this column. Asc Minimum = 0.13%Ac = 0.0013 x 225 x 255 = 65.8125 mm2 P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:29
  • 30. For detailing purposes this area of steel has to be transposed into bars of a given diameter and spacing using steel area tables. Provide 12 mm diameter 1 bar. e) SIZE AND MINIMUM NUMBER OF BARS From clause 3.12.5.3, BS 8110 . Columns with rectangular cross-sections should be reinforced with a minimum of four longitudinal bars and each of the bars should not be less than 12 mm in diameter.  Hence, provide 12 mm diameter 4 bars.  4H12 (As = 452 mm2) f) LINKS - (clause 3.12.7, BS 8110)  Size of links. Links should be at one-quarter of the size of the largest longitudinal bar or 6 mm, whichever is the greater. That is = 1 4 × 12 = 3 mm , but not less than 6mm diameter.  The spacing of the links, is the lesser of (a) 12 times the diameter of the smallest longitudinal bar, that is, 12 × 12 = 144 mm, or (b) The smallest cross-sectional dimension of the column (= 225 mm).  Provide H6 links at 125 mm centers. g) REINFORMATION DETAILS The sketch below shows the main reinforcement requirements for the column PLAN SECTION P.NIROJAN–JAF/CE/2014/F/0041–CIVILENGINEERING–2NDYEAR–2NDSEMISTER–S.L.I.A.T.EJAFFNACAMPAS–PAGE:30