This document discusses the challenges of using alternative ingredients in pig diets. It notes that:
1. Energy is the most costly component of pig diets and the cost of energy is rising, making the energy content and concentration of alternative ingredients an important consideration.
2. Alternative ingredients can impact carcass composition, such as fat levels and iodine value.
3. The nutrient composition of alternative ingredients varies widely between sources, requiring nutrient analysis to properly formulate diets. Consistent quality control of ingredients is important for optimal pig performance.
đChandigarh Call Girls đ9878799926đJust CallđChandigarh Call Girl In Chandiga...
Â
Dr. John Patience - Less Obvious Implications of Using Alternative Ingredients
1. âNOT SO OBVIOUSâ OBVIOUS
CHALLENGES OF USING
ALTERNATIVE INGREDIENTS IN
PRACTICAL PIG DIETS
John F. Patience
Applied Swine Nutrition
Dept. of Animal Science
Iowa State University
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
2. THINGS ARE NOT ALWAYS WHAT THEY SEEM
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
3. THINGS ARE NOT ALWAYS WHAT THEY SEEM
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
4. WHAT ARE THE âNSOâ CHALLENGES?
1. Cost of energy and concentration of energy
2. Impact of ingredients on carcass and pork
quality
3. Variability of nutrient composition
4. Differences in physical characteristics
5. Other
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
5. THE ISSUE
The cost differential as of January 23, 2012
between a traditional corn-soy diet
and a multi-ingredient diet
is at least $15.00/ton
and could be as high as $25.00/ton
or about $5/pig to $8/pig sold!!
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
6. HOW IMPORTANT IS FEED CONVERSION?
Feed Conversion = 2.63 Feed Conversion = 2.93
0.49
Each feed conversion point is worth
0.47
Value per pig of 0.01 improvement
30 to 32 cents per pig at todayâs feed costs
0.45
0.43
in feed conversion
0.41
0.39
0.37
0.35
0.33
0.31
0.29
0.27
0.25
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340
Average wean-to-finish feed cost, $/ton
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
7. GETTING DOWN TO BRASS TACKS
⢠Pigs do not have requirements for
ingredients, but rather energy and nutrients
Pigs around the
world
are successfully
raised to market
With little or no corn
or soybean meal
in their diet
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
8. EXAMPLE WEST. CANADIAN PIG DIETS
25 to 50 lb 75 to 150 lb Lactation
Wheat 16.77 36.63 30.28
Barley 12.92 15.00 10.00
Corn DDGS 20.00 15.00 20.00
Field peas 25.00 25.00 25.00
Soybean meal 18.09 - 5.75
Canola meal 3.50 5.00 5.00
Canola oil 0.50 0.50 0.32
Enzyme 0.04 0.04 0.04
Premix 0.40 0.40 0.40
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
10. FEEDING PROGRAM: PHILOSOPHY
Nutrient Nutrient
Requirements Supply
Feeding
Program
Pork Net Societal
Quality Income Sustainability
11. GETTING DOWN TO BRASS TACKS
⢠Pigs do not have requirements for ingredients,
but rather energy and nutrients
⢠The objective of pork production is financial
returns, not performance.
â Improved performance does not necessarily lead to
improved financial returns
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
12. âNOT SO OBVIOUSâ ISSUE #1
⢠Energy is the most costly component of the
diet, and the cost of energy is rising.
â We used to take the cost of energy for granted.
Not anymore!
â Are we using diet energy most effectively and
efficiently?
â By-products tend to have lower energy content
than corn and soybean meal.
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
14. THE RISING COST OF DIETARY ENERGY
Ingredient Cost, ME, NE, Cost, Cost,
$/ton Mcal/lb Mcal/lb ¢/Mcal ME ¢/Mcal NE
Corn 220 1.55 1.20 7.1 9.2
Corn DDGS 190 1.52 1.08 6.3 8.8
Wheat middlings 200 1.38 0.99 7.2 10.1
Bakery by-product 230 1.68 1.35 6.8 8.5
Soybean meal 300 1.52 0.89 9.9 16.9
AV blend 900 3.72 3.35 12.1 13.4
When corn cost $2.50/bu, 1 Mcal ME cost 2.9¢. It now costs 7.1¢.
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
15. HOW DAILY ENERGY INTAKE IS DIVIDED
BETWEEN MAINTENANCE AND GAIN
Functions Gain ME intake, Kcal/d
Maintenance - 2,516 (34%)
Protein (lean) gain 138 g/d (16%) 1,460 (20%)
Fat gain 267 g/d (31%) 3,358 (46%)
Total 1.90 lb/d (862 g/d) 7,300 (100%)
Assume the diet contains 1,500 kcal ME/lb and 0.85% SID lysine. The pig weighs between
100 to 200 lb, is gaining about 1.9 lb/d (total growout ADG = 1.85 lb) and is eating 4.9 lb of
feed/day, giving a feed conversion of 2.58 (total feeder to finish growout FC is 2.85:1).
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
16. EFFECT OF CORN BRAN WITH DECLINING OR
CONSTANT NE ON F:G IN FINISHING PIGS
Declining NE Constant NE
P < 0.001 P = 0.67
4.0
3.5 a
3.0 bc b
c c c c
2.5
F:G
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0 8 16 24
Corn bran level, %
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION Gutierrez et al., 2011
17. Body weight of weaned pigs was similar across
wheat classes, including CPS and durum
d7 d 14 d 21
28
24
Weight, lb
20
a ab ab ab b ab
16
12
Durum CPS-W CPS-R HRS HRW HW
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
18. IMPACT OF DIET ENERGY CONCENTRATION
ON AVERAGE DAILY GAIN, LB/D
Diet ME, Mcal/lb 1.43 1.47 1.51 1.55
Diet NE, Mcal/lb 1.02 1.05 1.09 1.12
Constant FI and wt 1.74 1.80 1.85 1.91
Constant FI and days 1.75 1.80 1.86 1.91
Constant wt, increasing FI 1.93 1.93 1.92 1.91
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
19. IMPACT OF DIET ENERGY CONCENTRATION
ON FEED EFFICIENCY
Diet ME, Mcal/lb 1.43 1.47 1.51 1.55
Diet NE, Mcal/lb 1.02 1.05 1.09 1.12
Constant FI and wt 3.03 2.91 2.82 2.73
Constant FI and days 2.94 2.87 2.79 2.73
Constant wt, increasing FI 2.98 2.89 2.81 2.73
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
20. IMPACT OF DIET ENERGY CONCENTRATION
ON FEED COST/PIG, $
Diet ME, Mcal/lb 1.43 1.47 1.51 1.55
Diet NE, Mcal/lb 1.02 1.05 1.09 1.12
Constant FI and wt $83.01 $82.57 $84.02 $85.45
Constant FI and days $73.58 $77.38 $80.90 $85.45
Constant wt, increasing FI $81.79 $81.74 $83.89 $85.45
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
21. Typically, we feed
pigs to achieve a
target growth rate, to
move pigs out of the
barn according to a
fill schedule
22. At what point do we
Typically, we feed accept that mainting
pigs to achieve a growth rate is too
target growth rate, to costly and less
move pigs out of the expensive diets
barn according to a supporting slower
fill schedule growth are more
profitable overall?
23. âNOT SO OBVIOUSâ ISSUE #2
⢠Energy is the most costly component of the
diet
⢠The impact of ingredients on carcass
composition
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
24. EFFECT OF FAT SOURCE AND LEVEL ON CARCASS
(JOWL) IV WHEN FED FROM 165 TO 290 LB
85
80.0a
80
75 IV = 74 72.6b
70.2c 70.3c
70
Iodine Value
66.3d 67.2d
65.4d
65
60
55
50
45
40
0 3 6 3 6 3 6
Tallow (IV = 41.9) CWG (IV = 66.5) Corn Oil (IV = 123.1)
Sex Pooled SEM P-Value
B G Trt Sex Trt Sex Source Level SXL
69.1 71.5 0.73 0.4 <.0001 0.0002 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION Kellner et al., 2011
25. âNOT SO OBVIOUSâ ISSUE #3
⢠Energy is the most costly component of the
diet
⢠The impact of ingredients on carcass
composition
⢠Many alternative ingredients vary widely in
composition. Therefore, adoption of
alternative ingredients requires investment in
lab assays.
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
27. NUTRIENT CONTENT OF 32 U.S. DDGS SOURCES
(100% DRY MATTER BASIS)
Nutrient Average Range
Dry matter, % 89.3 87.3-92.4
Crude protein, % 30.9 28.7-32.9
Crude fat, % 10.7 8.8-12.4
Crude fiber, % 7.2 5.4-10.4
Ash, % 6.0 3.0-9.8
Swine ME, kcal/lb 1,728 1,590-1,837
Lysine, % 0.90 0.61-1.06
Phosphorus, % 0.75 0.42-0.99
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION Source: Shurson
28. DE CONTENT OF 11 FIELD PEA SAMPLES
1800
DE (kcal/lb; 90% DM)
d
c,d c,d
b,c,d
1600 b,c b,c b,c
b,c
b
a a
1400
1200
Em Hi Ma Sp Ca Bo Da Or Vo Vi Mu
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION Variety
29. FEED EFFICIENCY OF PIGS
FED DE-CORRECTED DIETS
0.6
Feed efficiency (ADG/ADFI)
0.5 a a a a a
a a,b a,b
a,b a,b a,b
b
0.4
0.3
0.2
Em Hi Ma Sp Ca Bo Da Or Vo Vi Mu Con
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY Variety
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
30. INTEGRATED QUALITY CONTROL
Ensure pig performance is
within the tolerance of your
targets: growth, carcass, etc
PIGS
MIXED Feed INCOMING
FEED Manufacturing INGREDIENTS
Ensure feed Ensure feed
delivered to the mixing is Confirm composition
pigs meets their achieving in terms of both
requirements for uniform mixture desirable &
daily nutrient according to the undesirable
intake formulation constituents
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
31. âNOT SO OBVIOUSâ ISSUE #4
⢠Energy is the most costly component of the diet
⢠The impact of ingredients on carcass composition
⢠Variation in nutrient composition of alternative
ingredients
⢠The physical characteristics of different
ingredients may be different from those of corn
and soybean meal. Can you feed mixing and
delivery system handle this change?
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
33. SUMMARY: HIDDEN CHALLENGES
⢠Many alternative ingredients are lower in
energy. Most effective use occurs if diet
energy can be lowered â but performance may
suffer
⢠Changes in carcass composition and quality
⢠Increased need for quality control
⢠Changes in diet bulk density affect feed
mixing, delivery and storage capacity
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
34. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: ASN TEAM
Applied Swine Nutrition Team
Outside Iowa Machine Shed
Des Moines, IA
August, 2011
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
35. IOWA SWINE DAY 2012
WHAT Day devoted to sharing practical information on topics of interest to pork
producers
WHEN June 28, 2012
WHERE Scheman Hall, Iowa State University
WHO Pork producers (owner/operators, barn employees, contract growers, field
staff), affiliated industry personnel
TOPICS ânominatedâ by pork producers
1. PRRS
2. Biosecurity
3. Feed costs
4. Foaming pits
5. Pork exports
6. Ventilation
7. Risk management
8. Animal welfare
9. Human resources
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY
APPLIED SWINE NUTRITION
Hinweis der Redaktion
For most of you, this will be the first time you have heard me speak. So, Iâll take a minute to explain my approach, which is to begin my talk with a discussion on background information and basic principles. This is because we know that there are tremendous differences among farmsThe same pig will perform differently in different barns, in different seasons, under different health conditionsWe are also dealing with different pigs as well, among genotypes and within genotypesTherefore, and I can be accused of being too cautious, I am reluctant to make recommendations on nutrition that will apply under all conditions, because I know they will not.However, as I progress, I will move from principles to applications, hoping that you can then interpret my suggestions in the context of your own operationIn the interest of time, I am going to skip over some slides; you have them in your binder and therefore can get more details if you want themI would like to preserve my available time to focusing on the most important points
When you get as many grey hairs as I have, you know that what you see is not always what you get. Often our knowledge is like an iceberg. We know what we see above the surface, because we can see it. But what about things that are not so obvious, much like that part of the iceberg that is below the surface.Letâs take a look at this picture; what you see here is only part of the story. Letâs see what the whole picture looks likeâŚ
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!
When corn was $2.50/bu, ME cost only 2.9 c/Mcal!
MEm was estimated as 106 BW0.75. Protein gain is estimated based on our own data collected on various genotypes. Lipid gain is estimated from calculating total ME intake and subtracting that which is used for maintenance and for protein gain (Pd X 10.6). The residual is divided by 12.5 to estimate Ld.
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!
Not even sure F:G is even the right way to express feed efficiencyThe problem arises when we use feed efficiency to compare fill to fill and farm to farm â which is exactly how feed efficiency is used on the farm!