SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 131
“WHERE HAVE ALL
THE CROP ACRES
GONE?”
Bryce Larson, Calumet
County UW-Extension
Agriculture Educator
Special thank you to
Connie Leonhard our
program assistant for her
talents and assistance with
this project
October 21, 2010
How this project began
• Mary Kohrell, Calumet County UW-Extension
Resource Development Educator, invited me
to attend a Calumet County Working Lands
Committee Meeting, and that is the event that
triggered my interest in researching
information and data that resulted in the
following presentation.
Farm Land Disappearance
Nationwide 1964-2007
• From 1964 to 2007 the United States lost
188,092,000 acres of land in farms or the
equivalent of 5.3 states the size of Wisconsin.
During that time the US also lost 27,808,000
acres of crop land but showed an increase of
22,716,000 acres of the crop land available
that was harvested.
Time Line and Selected States
• I will be using data and information from the
1987-2007 Ag Census data for the remainder
of this summary on the disappearance of farm
land, crop land, and harvested crop land from
the IA, IL, IN, MI, MN, and WI and the selected
counties I have chosen to highlight.
Animal Unit Statistics
• I am also using Ag Census data to calculate the 1,000
lbs. animal units (AU) in each state and the changes
in numbers from 1987-2007. For these calculations I
have included dairy and beef cows, heifers and feed
lot animals, swine inventory herd, hogs fed and
slaughtered, laying hens, and broilers or meat birds.
I am using the NRCS animal unit conversion numbers
to equate the various animal units to 1,000 lbs. unit
increments that are used for converting varying
animal species to a standardized number.
US and Selected States Population
• I am using the April 2008 US, state, and county
population data to calculate the human
populations and the per capita calculations on
land lost from farms, crop land, and harvested
crop land.
• The United States in 2008 was estimated to
have 304 million citizens which translates into
80 persons per square mile.
Farm Land Loss Trends
• As one reviews the data from the US and the six states including
Wisconsin, there are some trends that become very evident.
• The majority of land in farms lost in the US occurred from 1964 to
1987.
• Good quality crop land in the US and in most states is continuing to
disappear and at faster rates than land in farms is disappearing.
This would indicate that good crop land is being utilized for other
types of developments and usage. Land in farms that is unsuitable
for cropping is in many cases unsuitable for many other uses.
• Harvested crop land continues to increase in the five states with the
exception of Wisconsin. To me this means that our remaining crop
land is being utilized more intensively and to grow either wheat or
row crops such as corn and soybeans.
USA Farmland loss (continued)
• Wisconsin has had the largest loss of land in farms, crop land
and is the only state of the 6 that has lost harvested crop land
over the last 20 years.
• Not only have we lost the highest percentage of farm land and
crop land we have lost the most absolute acres of crop land.
Only Michigan has fewer crop acres than Wisconsin yet we lost
1.5 million acres of crop land over the last 20 years. Some our
neighboring states have twice as many crop acres as does
Wisconsin and yet lost less total crop land.
• On a per capita basis Wisconsin consumes land in farms and
crop land at many fold the rate of our neighboring 5 states.
Wisconsin
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
Loss of 1,416,000 acres -8.51%
Crop land
Loss of 1,502,000 -13%
Harvested crop land
Loss of 454,000 acres -4.84%
April 2008 population estimate
5.63 million
99 persons per square mile
Minnesota
14,000,000
16,000,000
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
24,000,000
26,000,000
28,000,000
30,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
Gain of 344,000 acres +1%
Crop land
Gain of 72,000 acres +.003%
Harvested crop land
Gain of 2,632,000 acres +15.8%
April 2008 population estimate
5.2 million
62 persons per square mile
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
Loss of 891,000 acres -2.82%
Crop land
Loss of 974,000 acres -3.57%
Harvested crop land
Gain of 3,315,000 acres +16%
April 2008 population estimate
3,002,000
52 persons per square mile
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
24,000,000
26,000,000
28,000,000
30,000,000
32,000,000
34,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
Loss of 1,751,000 acres -3.3%
Crop land
Loss of 1,395,000 acres -5.56%
Harvested crop land
Gain of 2,509,000 acres +12.5%
April 2008 population estimate
12,904,000
223 persons per square mile
18,000,000
20,000,000
22,000,000
24,000,000
26,000,000
28,000,000
30,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
Loss of 285,000 acres -2.8%
Crop land
Loss of 378,000 acres -4.6%
Harvested crop land
Gain of 687,000 acres +11%
April 2008 population estimate
10,003,000
175 persons per square mile
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
Loss of 1,397,000 acres -8.7%
Crop land
Loss of 650,000 acres -6.5%
Harvested crop acres
Gain of 1,402,000 acres +9.4%
April 2008 population estimate
6,376,000
170 persons per square mile
10,000,000
11,000,000
12,000,000
13,000,000
14,000,000
15,000,000
16,000,000
17,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Wisconsin County Map
Brown County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
35,000 acres lost -15.8%
Crop Land
47,000 acres lost -22.8%
Harvested crop land
34,000 acres lost -19.7%
Population 245,000
Per square mile 429 120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Calumet County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
18,000 acres lost -10.7%
Crop Land
15,000 acres lost -10.4%
Harvested crop land
9,000 acres lost -7%
Population 45,000
Per square mile 127 100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Clark County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
5,000 acres lost -1.2%
Crop Land
16,000 acres lost -5.2%
Harvested crop land
15,000 acres gained +6%
Population 34,000
Per square mile 28 200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Dane County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
34,000 acres lost -6%
Crop Land
58,000 acres lost -12%
Harvested crop land
2,000 acres lost -1%
Population 483,000
Per square mile 355 300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
550,000
600,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Dodge County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
54,000 acres lost -12.4%
Crop Land
25,000 acres lost -6.9%
Harvested crop land
4,000 acres gained +1.2%
Population 88,000
Per square mile 77 280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
460,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Dunn County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
17,000 acres lost -4.25%
Crop Land
20,000 acres lost -7.4%
Harvested crop land
3,000 acres lost -1.5%
Population 43,000
Per square mile 47 150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Fond du Lac County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
23,000 acres lost -6.4%
Crop Land
21,000 acres lost -9.1%
Harvested crop land
13,000 acres lost -4.9
Population 109,000
Per square mile 135 220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Jefferson County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
12,000 acres lost -4.7%
Crop land
17,000 acres lost -8.2%
Harvested crop land
3,000 acres gained +1.7
Population 81,000
Per square mile 133 150,000
170,000
190,000
210,000
230,000
250,000
270,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Lafayette County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
30,000 acres lost -9.1%
Crop land
44,000 acres lost -15%
Harvested crop acres
8,000 acres lost -2.3%
Population 16,000
Per square mile 26 200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Manitowoc County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
29,000 acres lost -10.5%
Crop land
36,000 acres lost -15.3%
Harvested crop land
29,000 acres lost -13.3%
Population 81,000
Per square mile 140 150,000
170,000
190,000
210,000
230,000
250,000
270,000
290,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Marathon County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
91,000 acres lost -15.7%
Crop land
43,000 acres lost -11.8 %
Harvested crop land
13,000 acres lost -4.3%
Population 131,000
Per square mile 81 250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
550,000
600,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Outagamie County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
35,000 acres lost -12.5%
Crop land
33,000 acres lost -13.7%
Harvested crop land
19,000 acres lost -9.9%
Population 175,000
Per square mile 252 175,000
195,000
215,000
235,000
255,000
275,000
295,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Polk County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
26,000 acres lost -8.3%
Crop land
29,000 acres lost -14.5%
Harvested crop acres
11,000 acres lost -7.9%
Population 44,000
Per square mile 45 100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Rock County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
14,000 acres lost -4%
Crop land
22,000 acres lost -6.9%
Harvested crop land
21,000 acres gained +8%
Population 160,000
Per square mile 212 250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
350,000
370,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Shawano County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
54,000 acres lost -16.6%
Crop land
34,000 acres lost -15.25%
Harvested crop land
19,000 acres lost -9.1%
Population 41,000
Per square mile 46 150,000
170,000
190,000
210,000
230,000
250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
350,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Sheboygan County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
18,000 acres lost -8.6%
Crop land
22,000 acres lost -12.3%
Harvested crop land
11,000 acres lost -7.1%
Population 115,000
Per square mile 219 130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
190,000
200,000
210,000
220,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Taylor County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
22,000 acres lost -8.4%
Crop land
12,000 acres lost -8.5%
Harvested crop land
4,000 acres lost -3.4%
Population 19,000
Per square mile 20 50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Trempealeau County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
25,000 acres lost -6.9%
Crop land
41,000 acres lost -17.6%
Harvested crop land
27,000 acres lost -15.3%
Population 28,000
Per square mile 37 100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Washington County,
Wisconsin
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
26,000 acres lost -16.7%
Crop land
28,000 acres lost -21.2%
Harvested crop land
19,000 acres lost -16.7%
Population 130,000
Per square mile 273 80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Milwaukee County,
Wisconsin
(Milwaukee Metro Area)
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
4,300 acres lost -44%
Crop land
3,100 acres lost -50%
Harvested crop land
3,192 acres lost -45.5%
Population 959,421
Per square mile 3,885 2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
11,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Waukesha County,
Wisconsin
(Milwaukee Metro Area)
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
30,100 acres lost -31.7%
Crop land
37,100 acres lost -23.8%
Harvested crop land
19,500 acres lost -23.8%
Population 383,000
Per square mile 649 60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
140,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Kenosha County,
Wisconsin
(Milwaukee Metro Area)
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms -16.3%
Crop land -19.2%
Harvested crop land -7.5%
Population 165,382
Per square mile 548
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
80,000
85,000
90,000
95,000
100,000
105,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Racine County,
Wisconsin
(Milwaukee Metro Area)
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms -9.5%
Crop land -10.7%
Harvested crop land 0%
Population 201,000
Per square mile 567
90,000
95,000
100,000
105,000
110,000
115,000
120,000
125,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Minnesota Counties Map
Blue Earth County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
13,000 acres gained +.5%
Crop Land
0 acres gained or lost
Harvested crop land
65,000 acres gained +21.5%
Population 60,000
Per square mile 75 280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Dakota County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
26,000 acres gained +11.8%
Crop Land
23,000 acres gained +11.8%
Harvested crop land
50,000 acres gained +32%
Population 642,000
Per square mile 624 140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Faribault County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
26,000 acres gained +6%
Crop Land
28,000 acres gained +7%
Harvested crop land
88,000 acres gained +26.7%
Population 14,000
Per square mile 23 300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
460,000
480,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Houston County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
41,000 acres lost -14.5%
Crop Land
36,000 acres lost -20%
Harvested crop land
16,000 acres lost -13.3%
Population 19,000
Per square mile 35 80,000
130,000
180,000
230,000
280,000
330,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Olmstead County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
23,000 acres lost -7.2%
Crop Land
30,000 acres lost -10.6%
Harvested crop land
23,000 acres gained +12.5%
Population 141,000
Per square mile 190 150,000
170,000
190,000
210,000
230,000
250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Ottertail County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
23,000 acres gained +2.6%
Crop Land
33,000 acres lost -5.3%
Harvested crop land
7,000 acres gained +1.5%
Population 51,000
Per square mile 29 400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Pipestone County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
2,000 acres lost -1%
Crop Land
4,000 acres lost -2.0%
Harvested crop land
22,000 acres gained +13.4%
Population 9,400
Per square mile 21 150,000
170,000
190,000
210,000
230,000
250,000
270,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Polk County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
22,000 acres gained +2.3%
Crop Land
15,000 acres gained +1.6%
Harvested crop land
85,000 acres gained +12.0 %
Population 31,000
Per square mile 16 600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1,100,000
1,200,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Stearns County,
Minnesota
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
36,000 acres gained +5.4%
Crop Land
6,000 acres gained +1%
Harvested crop land
52,000 acres gained +12.5%
Population 147,000
Per square mile 99 400,000
450,000
500,000
550,000
600,000
650,000
700,000
750,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Iowa Counties Map
Boone County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
5,000 acres lost -1.5%
Crop Land
40,000 acres lost -13.3%
Harvested crop land
8,000 acres gained +3.2%
Population 26,000
Per square mile 47 220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Butler County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
48,000 acres gained +14.6%
Crop Land
47,000 acres gained +15.1%
Harvested crop land
96,000 acres gained +42%
Population 15,000
Per square mile 26 220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Clinton County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
19,000 acres gained +5%
Crop land
19,000 acres gained +5.6%
Harvested crop land
75,000 acres gained +29%
Population 49,000
Per square mile 72 250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
350,000
370,000
390,000
410,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Dallas County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
31,000 acres lost -9.5%
Crop land
25,000 acres lost -8.7%
Harvested crop land
21,000 acres gained +8.0%
Population 60,000
Per square mile 70 200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Dubuque County
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
23,000 acres lost -6.9%
Crop land
39,000 acres lost -11.2%
Harvested crop land
3,000 acres gained +1.0%
Population 93,000
Per square mile 147 180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Harrison County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
22,000 acres lost-5.7%
Crop land
15,000 acres lost -4.6%
Harvested crop land
33,000 acres gained +17.3%
Population 15,350
Per square mile 23 240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Sioux County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
7,000 acres gained +1.3%
Crop land
3,000 acres gained +1.0%
Harvested crop land
78,000 acres gained +22.0%
Population 32,000
Per square mile 41 340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
460,000
480,000
500,000
520,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Tama County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
14,000 acres gained +3.3%
Crop land
13,000 acres gained +3.5%
Harvested crop land
69,000 acres gained +25%
Population 18,000
Per square mile 25 250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
350,000
370,000
390,000
410,000
430,000
450,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Warren County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
62,000 acres lost -20.4
Crop land
95,000 acres lost -33.0%
Harvested crop land
26,000 acres lost -16.7%
Population 45,000
Per square mile 71 100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Wayne County,
Iowa
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
8,000 acres lost -2.9%
Crop land
51,000 acres gained +23.4%
Harvested crop land
6,000 acres gained +5.0%
Population 6,000
Per square mile 13 100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Illinois Counties Map
Henry County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
34,000 acres gained +7.4%
Crop land
34,000 acres gained +8.25%
Harvested crop land
42,000 acres gained +10.9%
Population 50,000
Per square mile 62 300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
460,000
480,000
500,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Iroquois County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
1,000 acres lost -0.2%
Crop land
13,000 acres gained +2.0%
Harvested crop land
12,000 acres gained +1.2%
Population 30,000
Per square mile 28 540,000
560,000
580,000
600,000
620,000
640,000
660,000
680,000
700,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Kane County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
15,000 acres lost -7.25%
Crop land
15,000 acres lost -7.4%
Harvested crop land
17,000 acres lost -8.2%
Population 506,000
Per square mile 777 150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
190,000
200,000
210,000
220,000
230,000
240,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
LaSalle County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
56,000 acres gained +9.5%
Crop land
61,000 acres gained +11.1%
Harvested crop land
64,000 acres gained +11.9%
Population 113,000
Per square mile 98 480,000
500,000
520,000
540,000
560,000
580,000
600,000
620,000
640,000
660,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
McLean County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
21,000 acres lost -3.4%
Crop land
19,000 acres lost -2.9%
Harvested crop land
16,000 acres lost -2.5%
Population 165,000
Per square mile 127 550,000
600,000
650,000
700,000
750,000
800,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Madison County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
29,000 acres gained +10.2%
Crop land
37,000 acres gained +14.9%
Harvested crop land
56,000 acres gained +19.8%
Population 268,000
Per square mile 357 220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
St. Clair County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
48,000 acres gained +18%
Crop land
46,000 acres gained +19.2%
Harvested crop land
48,000 acres gained +20.8%
Population 263,000
Per square mile 386 200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Stephenson County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
29,000 acres gained +9.3%
Crop land
33,000 acres gained +10.4%
Harvested crop land
42,000 acres gained +16.6%
Population 46,000
Per square mile 87 200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Wayne County,
Illinois
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
11,000 acres gained +3.7%
Crop land
10,000 acres gained +3.6%
Harvested crop land
23,000 acres gained +10.2%
Population 16,000
Per square mile 24 200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Indiana Counties Map
Allen County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
37,000 acres lost -12.7%
Crop land
27,000 acres lost -10.5%
Harvested crop land
3,000 acres lost -1.4%
Population 350,000
Per square mile 505 200,000
210,000
220,000
230,000
240,000
250,000
260,000
270,000
280,000
290,000
300,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Clinton County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
8,000 acres gained +3.2%
Crop land
16,000 acres gained +6.9%
Harvested crop land
45,000 acres gained +12.3%
Population 34,000
Per square mile 84 180,000
190,000
200,000
210,000
220,000
230,000
240,000
250,000
260,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Elkhart County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
42,000 acres lost -20.5%
Crop land
37,000 acres lost -20.7%
Harvested crop land
11,000 acres lost -7.5%
Population 200,000
Per square mile 394 120,000
130,000
140,000
150,000
160,000
170,000
180,000
190,000
200,000
210,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Greene County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
32,000 acres lost -15.4%
Crop land
25,000 acres lost -17.4%
Harvested crop land
6,000 acres gained +5.7%
Population 33,000
Per square mile 61 80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Harrison County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
30,000 acres lost -16.2%
Crop land
23,000 acres lost -19.9%
Harvested crop land
11,000 acres gained +14.8%
Population 37,000
Per square mile 71 60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Jackson County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
7,000 acres lost -3.25%
Crop land
2,000 acres lost -1.2%
Harvested crop land
37,000 acres gained +21.0%
Population 42,000
Per square mile 81 100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Knox County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
18,000 acres gained +5.8%
Crop land
24,000 acres gained +12.4%
Harvested crop land
80,000 acres gained +35.8%
Population 38,000
Per square mile 76 200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Lake County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
17,000 acres lost -11.8%
Crop land
16,000 acres lost -13.0%
Harvested crop land
15,000 acres lost -11.3%
Population 493,000
Per square mile 975 110,000
115,000
120,000
125,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
145,000
150,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Marion County,
Indiana
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
40,000 acres lost -70.2%
Crop land
34,000 acres lost -69.2%
Harvested crop land
28,000 acres lost -68.3%
Population 880,000
Per square mile 2,173 10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Michigan Counties Map
Alpena County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
14,000 acres lost -17.1%
Crop land
5,000 acres gained +9.0%
Harvested crop land
11,000 acres gained +31.0%
Population 34,000
Per square mile 55 30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Calhoun County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
25,000 acres lost -9.9%
Crop land
19,000 acres lost -9.8%
Harvested crop land
25,000 acres gained +18.9%
Population 136,000
Per square mile 195 100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Claire County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
0 acres gained or lost 0%
Crop land
10,000 acres lost -20.8%
Harvested crop land
1,000 acres lost -3.6%
Population 30,000
Per square mile 55 20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Clinton County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
15,000 acres gained +5.8%
Crop land
13,000 acres gained +5.9%
Harvested crop land
41,000 acres gained +23.1%
Population 70,000
Per square mile 113 160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Kent County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
34,000 acres lost -16.7%
Crop land
31,000 acres lost -19.1%
Harvested crop land
4,000 acres lost -3.3%
Population 605,000
Per square mile 671 100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Lapeer County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
43,000 acres lost -19.7%
Crop land
20,000 acres lost -11.4%
Harvested crop land
10,000 acres lost -8.0%
Population 91,000
Per square mile 134 100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
220,000
240,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Lenawee County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
4,000 acres gained +1%
Crop land
5,000 acres lost -1.7%
Harvested crop land
8,000 acres gained +3.1%
Population 101,000
Per square mile 130 250,000
270,000
290,000
310,000
330,000
350,000
370,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Menominee County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
14,000 acres lost -11.9%
Crop land
4,000 acres lost -6.25%
Harvested crop land
10,000 acres gained +20%
Population 24,000
Per square mile 24 40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
110,000
120,000
130,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Muskegon County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
2,000 acres lost -2.5%
Crop land
1,000 acres gained +1.3%
Harvested crop land
8,000 acres gained +18.2%
Population 174,000
Per square mile 334 40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
70,000
75,000
80,000
85,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Oakland County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
27,000 acres lost -55%
Crop land
28,000 acres lost -58.4%
Harvested crop land
19,000 acres lost -57.6%
Population 1,202,000
Per square mile 1,368 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Saginaw County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
16,000 acres gained +5.2%
Crop land
9,000 acres lost -3.25%
Harvested crop land
20,000 acres gained +8.1%
Population 205,000
Per square mile 260 220,000
240,000
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Sanilac County,
Michigan
Total % gain or loss over 20 years
Land in farms
14,000 acres lost -3.25%
Crop land
23,000 acres lost -5.9%
Harvested crop land
32,000 acres gained +10.5%
Population 42,064
Per square mile 46 280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
440,000
460,000
1987 1992 1997 2002 2007
Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
Possible reasons Wisconsin may be losing
farm land more quickly
• Wisconsin was logged earlier and more
quickly than most neighboring states due to
our southern flowing rivers. That encouraged
softwood harvest and the creation of several
cities and towns throughout our rural
northern portion of Wisconsin.
Wisconsin River Map
Michigan Rivers
Minnesota Rivers
Possible reasons Wisconsin may be losing
farm land more quickly (continued)
• The second wave of logging came with the advent
of the railroad that allowed the harvest of the
heavier hardwoods. Those millions of acres of
cut over land created opportunities for immigrant
farmers to settle and homestead many sections
of northern Wisconsin. Transportation routes
were created to move people and goods to and
from these communities.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Wisconsin agriculture under the
guidance of W. D. Hoard moved from a wheat crop grain agriculture to
a dairy and forage agriculture.
• The number of farms and dairy cows continued to grow until the early
1950s when there were roughly 180,000 dairy farms in Wisconsin with
2.2 million dairy cows scattered throughout Wisconsin.
• The need to transport a highly perishable product such as milk
necessitated a dependable and expansive highway and road system.
• Dairy, the manufacturing of dairy products, and the related industries
require large amounts of labor; thus, many people and workers were
needed to support the dairy industry.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Wisconsin has many more residents more
recently tied to farm and rural life than our
neighboring states do.
• Wisconsin has a very strong local government
governance system. How much more politically
active and powerful our local township
government is than our neighboring states, I do
not know; but, we do have a very strong
township form of government in Wisconsin.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Wisconsin residents have German as their major
ancestry (43%) as compared to 15% for the USA. How
much influence does national origin and culture have
on our land use issues? The other states have the
following rates of German as their major ancestry
• MN 37%
• IA 36%
• ILL 20%
• IN 23%
• MI 20%
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Due to many large rivers with dependable water
supplies and the creation of many large reservoirs
for managed water release and the reduction of
spring flooding, electricity through hydro electric
systems came quite quickly to rural Wisconsin.
• The existing road ways for transporting dairy
products created easements for power line
systems to be installed. With good roads and
electricity, rural life in Wisconsin was attractive
even prior to World War II.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Many of the major manufacturing firms located in
Eastern Wisconsin were seasonal companies for
decades. The manufacturing of farm equipment
was the major product and many dairy farmers
worked in those plants during the winter and
then the plants shut down major portions of their
production during the summer. As the firms grew
and their product lines developed, the need for
year round production created good
manufacturing jobs for many citizens.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Firms such as Kohler, Brillion Iron Works, the
Manitowoc Company, Tecumseh, Ariens, etc.
are just a few firms that grew with our dairy
and rural agriculture sector.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Many of the acres farmed and cropped by
dairy farmers have production limitations for
row crops and large equipment. Much of our
cut over dairy land, rolling glaciated farm land,
and our bluff and coulee, drift less area does
not allow for large expansive row crop
agriculture; thus, as the dairy industry has
been shrinking in some of these areas, so has
the crop land and the harvested crop land.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• With modern day agriculture utilizing more
capital investment to farm more acres with less
labor, many of our smaller fields with slope
limitations etc. do not allow the efficient use of
equipment that has high capacity and also high
ownership and operational costs. No-till,
conservation tillage, and grazing have become
more common place in many of these areas and
is keeping these lands in agriculture production.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• With modern day agriculture utilizing more
capital investment to farm more acres with less
labor, many of our smaller fields with slope
limitations etc. do not allow the efficient use of
equipment that has high capacity and also high
ownership and operational costs. No-till,
conservation tillage, and grazing have become
more common place in many of these areas and
is keeping these lands in agriculture production.
Bed Rock Map of Wisconsin
Glacial Till and Terminal Moraines of
Wisconsin
Soil Regions of Wisconsin
Potential Prime Farm Land in
Wisconsin
Ecological Tension Zone in Wisconsin
Early Vegetation Map of Wisconsin
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Dairy cows require a large land base per cow and
replacement to be able to raise enough forage and grain
to produce the large volumes of milk, maintain
themselves, and grow replacements.
• Considerable land is also needed to land-apply large
volumes of semi-solid and liquid manure.
• The fact that dairy cows utilize very bulky, wet feeds
increases the need for significant storage capacity and
also the need to transport bulky and wet feeds from
growing sites to storage sites.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• Even though large dairy complexes can be built to
take advantage of efficiencies of scale, the feed
production area and the manure distribution area
need to be large to adequately supply the dairy
complex with sufficient feed and other land
based resources.
• This means that cows can be concentrated, but
their feed, fiber, and manure distribution foot
print is still very large.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• The Wisconsin legislature has passed several laws
that have created credits or tax relief for land that
remains in agriculture production.
• Up until the most recent law on land taxed based
on use, most of these programs, although
beneficial to farmers, did not stop Wisconsin
from being the state in this report that lost the
most crop land over the last 20 years.
Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss
(continued)
• The dairy industry in Wisconsin manufactures about 90
plus percent of the milk produced in the state.
• The dairy manufacturing industry, along with the many
other dairy-related businesses, creates a strong link
between the rural farm, rural non farm, and even our
suburban and urban citizens.
• These close ties are great in making a 20 billion dollar
per year industry work well, but the close relationship
can and does also create use and space issues and
constraints.
Cows per crop acre 1987-2007
Selected Counties
1987 2007
County Cows Crop acres Crop acres/cow Cows Crop acres Crop acres /cow
Brown 37,630 192,000 5.1 39,020 160,561 4.1
Calumet 29,544 144,800 4.9 28,222 128,524 4.3
Clark 64,571 308,557 4.77 64,438 291,609 4.52
Dane 65,246 474,688 7.2 51,454 417,244 8.1
Dodge 61,361 366,503 5.9 40,639 342,684 8.4
Dunn 40,174 271,106 6.7 23,143 250,765 10.8
Fond du Lac 51,742 307,598 5.9 47,256 279,922 5.9
Jefferson 24,532 207,051 8.4 14,669 190,189 12.9
Lafayette 44,054 294,200 6.69 30,737 249,866 8.12
Manitowoc 47,283 245,558 5.19 45,704 199,725 4.36
Marathon 75,983 356,789 4.56 62,840 323,614 5.14
Outagamie 43,504 240,719 5.5 37,681 207,537 5.5
Polk 29,643 201,026 8.1 16,540 172,203 10.3
Rock 23,165 320,063 13.75 11,862 298,238 25
Shawano 48,094 222,877 4.6 36,453 189,064 5.18
Sheboygan 29,158 179,257 6.15 26,022 157,607 6.0
Taylor 28,857 141,699 4.9 16,609 129,825 7.8
Trempealeau 33,144 233,334 7.0 21,811 192,305 8.8
Washington 23,753 131,753 5.5 14,772 104,273 7.0
WI average 1,743,427 11,618,876 6.8 1,249,309 10,116,279 8.1
Animal Units /1,000 lbs. Equivalent
State
1987
(millions)
2007
(millions)
%
Change
Illinois
Cattle and calves 1.9 1.2 -37
Swine herd 2.2 1.72 -22
Market hogs 1.3 2.67 +205
Laying hens NA 0.05
Broilers * * *
Total AU 5.52 5.6 +1.4
Indiana
Cattle and calves 1.3 0.9 -30
Swine herd 1.7 1.5 -12
Market hogs 1.2 2.0 +66
Laying hens N/A 0.24
Broilers 0.11 0.185 +68
Total AU 4.11 4.8 +17
Animal Units /1,000 lbs. Equivalent
State
1987
(millions)
2007
(millions)
%
Change
Iowa
Cattle and calves 4.3 4.0 -7
Swine herd 5.2 7.7 +48
Market hogs 4.0 9.3 +232
Laying hens N/A 0.55
Broilers 0.02 0.04 +200
Total AU 13.61 21.59 +59
Michigan
Cattle and calves 1.1 1 -9
Swine herd 0.5 0.4 -20
Market hogs 0.6 0.6 0
Laying hens N/A .09
Broilers 0.01 .02 +200
Total AU 2.1 2.1 0
Animal Units /1,000 lbs. Equivalent
State
1987
(millions)
2007
(millions)
%
Change
Minnesota
Cattle and calves 2.7 2.4 -12
Swine herd 1.7 3.0 +76
Market hogs 1.2 5.0 +417
Laying hens N/A .11 0
Broilers 0.135 0.24 +460
Total AU 5.75 10.75 +87
Wisconsin
Cattle and calves 4.1 3.4 -17
Swine herd .17 .6 -71
Market hogs .3 .2 -33
Laying hens N/A .05 0
Broilers .05 .23 +46
Total AU 4.95 4.03 -18
Rural Population Stats
State
Total
Population
Total Rural
Population
Rural
Population
(as a % of
state)
% of
State
Ranking
Total Farm
Population
Farm
Population
(as a % of
state total)
Non Farm
Rural
Population
Non Farm
Rural
Population
(as a % of
state total)
Illinois 12,419,293 1,508,961 12.2 41 127,879 1.0 1,381,082 11.1
Indiana 6,080,485 1,777,305 29.2 23 125,698 2.1 1,651,607 27.2
Iowa 2,926,324 1,139,641 38.9 14 171,374 5.9 968,267 33.1
Michigan 9,938,444 2,518,920 25.3 29 94,192 0.9 2,424,728 24.4
Minnesota 4,919,479 1,430,160 29.1 24 149,204 3.0 1,280,956 26.0
Wisconsin 5,363,675 1,698,538 31.7 20 137,115 2.6 1,561,423 29.1
USA 281,421,906 59,063,597 21.0 2,987,531 1.1 56,076,066 19.9
Acres of crop land per rural resident
State/Nation Crop acres per resident using 2002 USDA crop
acres and 2000 USA Census
USA 7.3 crop acres per rural resident
Illinois 16 crop acres per rural resident
Indiana 7.3 crop acres per rural resident
Iowa 24 crop acres per rural resident
Michigan 3.2 crop acres per rural resident
Minnesota 16 crop acres per rural resident
Wisconsin 6.3 crop acres per rural resident
Income figures for each state
State/Nation 1990 2006 Percent change
USA $18,667 $36,714 +196
Illinois $20,159 $38,409 +190
Indiana $16,815 $32,288 +192
Iowa $16,683 $33,038 +198
Michigan $18,239 $33,788 +185
Minnesota $18,784 $38,859 +207
Wisconsin $17,399 $34,405 +198
Average Agriculture land prices for
2009 (per acre)
• Illinois
– Average Ag land value $4,330
– Southern Illinois $3,400
– Central and Northern Illinois $5,500-$6,000
• Indiana
– Average Ag land value $4,198
– 118 bu. corn average $3,238
– 150 bu. corn average $4,188
– 182 bu. corn average $5,169
• Iowa
– Average Ag land value $4,371
– South Central lowest average value $2,537
– Northwest highest average value $5,364
– Central Iowa (3 districts 25 counties) $4,775
Average Agriculture land prices for
2009 (per acre)
• Michigan
– Average $3,750 per acre
– Poorer land average- $2,800 per acre
– Better land average- $4,101 (not including fruit tree acres)
• Minnesota
– Average land price $2,870
– Poorer land averages $1,150
– Good crop land averages $4,750
• Wisconsin
– Average of all agriculture land, all parcels $3,750 per acre
– Bare land, parcels more than 35 acres not sold to relatives $3,190 per acre
with average parcel size of 79-80 acres
– North central average price is $1,856 per acre
– South East average price is $5,376 per acre.
Farm land legislation to protect farm
land acres
• Iowa
• First Ag land protection bill 1939
• The states that have passed the most farm land protection or credit
legislation are IA, MN and WI.
• These are also states with the most cattle, the most German and
Scandinavian ancestries.
• As you can see however that in two out of the three states farm
land loss has been minimal while in Wisconsin our historical farm
land legislation has not been successful in saving farm land.
• The latest taxation for use legislation is probably the most effective
in saving farm land. The real question is who are the real
beneficiaries of that legislation?
Farm land legislation to protect farm
land acres
• The other three states Ill, IN an MI have
passed less legislation on tax savings, tax
credits but have been very pro active in
working with right to farm legislation and thus
in particular in southern MI which still has a
significant dairy industry you see sizable
livestock farm operations surrounded by
developed land. This is also quite common in
northern Ill and northern IN.
What are my thoughts on our rapid and continuous
loss of farm land and in particular our crop land?
• Have we as a state grew faster in population than
our neighbors? NO
• Have we as a state had faster income gains than
our neighbors? NO
• Have we as a state grown our GDP faster than our
neighbors? NO
• Have we increased our business sector or
manufacturing and service economies faster than
our neighbors? NO
If the answer to all these
questions is NO, then what
has Wisconsin gained by our
extensive farm land and crop
land losses?

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

The Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic Audiences
The Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic AudiencesThe Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic Audiences
The Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic Audiences
sondramilkie
 
Scholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott Peters
Scholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott PetersScholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott Peters
Scholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott Peters
sondramilkie
 
Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...
Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...
Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...
sondramilkie
 
Understanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal Justice
Understanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal JusticeUnderstanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal Justice
Understanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal Justice
sondramilkie
 
"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension
"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension
"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension
sondramilkie
 
Protecting Your Privacy Online
Protecting Your Privacy OnlineProtecting Your Privacy Online
Protecting Your Privacy Online
sondramilkie
 
Rute media festival presentation
Rute media festival presentationRute media festival presentation
Rute media festival presentation
rutelopes95
 
Teaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational Learners
Teaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational LearnersTeaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational Learners
Teaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational Learners
sondramilkie
 
"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration
"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration
"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration
sondramilkie
 
Nutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and Training
Nutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and TrainingNutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and Training
Nutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and Training
sondramilkie
 
What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...
What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...
What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...
sondramilkie
 
Integrating Sustainability-2
Integrating Sustainability-2Integrating Sustainability-2
Integrating Sustainability-2
sondramilkie
 
Integrating Sustainability-4
Integrating Sustainability-4Integrating Sustainability-4
Integrating Sustainability-4
sondramilkie
 
Putting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for Producers
Putting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for ProducersPutting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for Producers
Putting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for Producers
sondramilkie
 
2010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-4
2010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-42010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-4
2010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-4
sondramilkie
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

The Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic Audiences
The Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic AudiencesThe Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic Audiences
The Learning Process of Reaching Out and Programming to Hispanic Audiences
 
Scholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott Peters
Scholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott PetersScholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott Peters
Scholarship as Collaborative Public Work: Extension's Unique Niche--Scott Peters
 
Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...
Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...
Connecting the Dots: Program Sustainability, Relationships and Building Capac...
 
Inspirational
InspirationalInspirational
Inspirational
 
Understanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal Justice
Understanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal JusticeUnderstanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal Justice
Understanding the System: Creating Impacts in Criminal Justice
 
"Power of Wind"
"Power of Wind""Power of Wind"
"Power of Wind"
 
"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension
"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension
"Everybody is a Somebody" A Dialogue on Classism in Cooperative Extension
 
Protecting Your Privacy Online
Protecting Your Privacy OnlineProtecting Your Privacy Online
Protecting Your Privacy Online
 
Rute media festival presentation
Rute media festival presentationRute media festival presentation
Rute media festival presentation
 
Teaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational Learners
Teaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational LearnersTeaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational Learners
Teaching Financial Literacy: Engagement of Multigenerational Learners
 
Witch's hats exhibition
Witch's hats exhibitionWitch's hats exhibition
Witch's hats exhibition
 
"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration
"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration
"Power of Wind" Enhancing Facilitation through Science-Based Exploration
 
Exploring Ag through 4-H
Exploring Ag through 4-HExploring Ag through 4-H
Exploring Ag through 4-H
 
Nutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and Training
Nutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and TrainingNutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and Training
Nutrient Management: Education, On-farm Research, and Training
 
What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...
What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...
What Do You Get When You Cross a Logic Model with Transdisciplinary Action-Re...
 
Integrating Sustainability-2
Integrating Sustainability-2Integrating Sustainability-2
Integrating Sustainability-2
 
Integrating Sustainability-4
Integrating Sustainability-4Integrating Sustainability-4
Integrating Sustainability-4
 
Conservation Tech
Conservation TechConservation Tech
Conservation Tech
 
Putting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for Producers
Putting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for ProducersPutting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for Producers
Putting New 2008 Farm Bill Programs to Work for Producers
 
2010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-4
2010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-42010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-4
2010 Department of Community Resource Development Symposium-4
 

Ähnlich wie Where Have All the Crop Acres Gone?

What is the current state of food production in the region?
What is the current state of food production in the region?What is the current state of food production in the region?
What is the current state of food production in the region?
oneregionforward
 

Ähnlich wie Where Have All the Crop Acres Gone? (20)

Trends in Agricultural Values and the Fundamental Reasons Why - Kenton Springer
Trends in Agricultural Values and the Fundamental Reasons Why - Kenton SpringerTrends in Agricultural Values and the Fundamental Reasons Why - Kenton Springer
Trends in Agricultural Values and the Fundamental Reasons Why - Kenton Springer
 
Me presentation[2887]
Me presentation[2887]Me presentation[2887]
Me presentation[2887]
 
1. Ag Census 2016 - Steve Duff
1. Ag Census 2016 - Steve Duff1. Ag Census 2016 - Steve Duff
1. Ag Census 2016 - Steve Duff
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1.pptx
 
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptxbnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
bnwebinar07-24-13_1 (2).pptx
 
The Impact of Land Fragmentation in the Trans-Pecos
The Impact of Land Fragmentation in the Trans-PecosThe Impact of Land Fragmentation in the Trans-Pecos
The Impact of Land Fragmentation in the Trans-Pecos
 
The Decline of Farming in Buena Vista County Iowa
The Decline of Farming in Buena Vista County IowaThe Decline of Farming in Buena Vista County Iowa
The Decline of Farming in Buena Vista County Iowa
 
Kant(t) Your County Feed Itself?
Kant(t) Your County Feed Itself?Kant(t) Your County Feed Itself?
Kant(t) Your County Feed Itself?
 
Saratoga County Agriculture and Business Economic Index 9.19.18
Saratoga County Agriculture and Business Economic Index 9.19.18Saratoga County Agriculture and Business Economic Index 9.19.18
Saratoga County Agriculture and Business Economic Index 9.19.18
 
What is the current state of food production in the region?
What is the current state of food production in the region?What is the current state of food production in the region?
What is the current state of food production in the region?
 
Manejo Sostenible del Agua para Riego en Producción de Vegetales y Hortalizas...
Manejo Sostenible del Agua para Riego en Producción de Vegetales y Hortalizas...Manejo Sostenible del Agua para Riego en Producción de Vegetales y Hortalizas...
Manejo Sostenible del Agua para Riego en Producción de Vegetales y Hortalizas...
 
Sustaining a Rural Landscape
Sustaining a Rural LandscapeSustaining a Rural Landscape
Sustaining a Rural Landscape
 
Assessment of the Cost of Soil Erosion to Crop Production in Canada
Assessment of the Cost of Soil Erosion to Crop Production in CanadaAssessment of the Cost of Soil Erosion to Crop Production in Canada
Assessment of the Cost of Soil Erosion to Crop Production in Canada
 
Farming Decline in Winnebago County Iowa
Farming Decline in Winnebago County IowaFarming Decline in Winnebago County Iowa
Farming Decline in Winnebago County Iowa
 
QEW African Diaspora Earthcare Coalition, UN High Level Political Forum (HLP...
 QEW African Diaspora Earthcare Coalition, UN High Level Political Forum (HLP... QEW African Diaspora Earthcare Coalition, UN High Level Political Forum (HLP...
QEW African Diaspora Earthcare Coalition, UN High Level Political Forum (HLP...
 
Rice in North america
Rice in North americaRice in North america
Rice in North america
 
A slide show presentation for surf
A slide show presentation for surfA slide show presentation for surf
A slide show presentation for surf
 
Pierce CD - Agricultural Assistance Program
Pierce CD - Agricultural Assistance ProgramPierce CD - Agricultural Assistance Program
Pierce CD - Agricultural Assistance Program
 
The Decline of Farming in Pocahontas County Iowa
The Decline of Farming in Pocahontas County IowaThe Decline of Farming in Pocahontas County Iowa
The Decline of Farming in Pocahontas County Iowa
 
Restoring Depleted Soils - Kitchen
Restoring Depleted Soils - KitchenRestoring Depleted Soils - Kitchen
Restoring Depleted Soils - Kitchen
 

Mehr von sondramilkie

Recognition Moments
Recognition MomentsRecognition Moments
Recognition Moments
sondramilkie
 
Connect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth Sweeney
Connect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth SweeneyConnect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth Sweeney
Connect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth Sweeney
sondramilkie
 
Communicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug Court
Communicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug CourtCommunicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug Court
Communicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug Court
sondramilkie
 
Taking the Terror out of Writing for Publication
Taking the Terror out of Writing for PublicationTaking the Terror out of Writing for Publication
Taking the Terror out of Writing for Publication
sondramilkie
 
Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...
Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...
Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...
sondramilkie
 
It’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong Relationships
It’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong RelationshipsIt’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong Relationships
It’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong Relationships
sondramilkie
 
Asset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic Development
Asset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic DevelopmentAsset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic Development
Asset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic Development
sondramilkie
 
Promising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse Audiences
Promising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse AudiencesPromising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse Audiences
Promising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse Audiences
sondramilkie
 
Maximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel Members
Maximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel MembersMaximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel Members
Maximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel Members
sondramilkie
 
Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences wnep ap...
Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences   wnep ap...Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences   wnep ap...
Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences wnep ap...
sondramilkie
 
Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...
Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...
Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...
sondramilkie
 
A Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity Issues
A Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity IssuesA Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity Issues
A Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity Issues
sondramilkie
 
Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...
Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...
Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...
sondramilkie
 
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
sondramilkie
 
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
sondramilkie
 
Integrating Sustainability-3
Integrating Sustainability-3Integrating Sustainability-3
Integrating Sustainability-3
sondramilkie
 
Integrating Sustainability
Integrating SustainabilityIntegrating Sustainability
Integrating Sustainability
sondramilkie
 
Engaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build Opportunity
Engaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build OpportunityEngaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build Opportunity
Engaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build Opportunity
sondramilkie
 
Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...
Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...
Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...
sondramilkie
 

Mehr von sondramilkie (20)

Recognition Moments
Recognition MomentsRecognition Moments
Recognition Moments
 
Connect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth Sweeney
Connect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth SweeneyConnect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth Sweeney
Connect the Dots and Change the Game--Linda Booth Sweeney
 
Communicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug Court
Communicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug CourtCommunicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug Court
Communicating Value: UWEX Partners with County Drug Court
 
Taking the Terror out of Writing for Publication
Taking the Terror out of Writing for PublicationTaking the Terror out of Writing for Publication
Taking the Terror out of Writing for Publication
 
Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...
Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...
Tricky Terminology: Making Sense Of and Applying Research and Evidence-Based ...
 
It’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong Relationships
It’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong RelationshipsIt’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong Relationships
It’s All About Me! My Responsibility in Building Strong Relationships
 
Asset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic Development
Asset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic DevelopmentAsset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic Development
Asset-Based and Collaborative Strategies for Community Economic Development
 
Promising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse Audiences
Promising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse AudiencesPromising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse Audiences
Promising Strategies for Engaging Culturally Diverse Audiences
 
Maximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel Members
Maximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel MembersMaximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel Members
Maximizing the Teen Court Experience for Youth Panel Members
 
Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences wnep ap...
Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences   wnep ap...Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences   wnep ap...
Innovative responses to working with diverse and emerging audiences wnep ap...
 
Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...
Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...
Technology across the Generations: Using Educational Technologies to Engage M...
 
A Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity Issues
A Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity IssuesA Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity Issues
A Cross-Programmatic Response to Food Insecurity Issues
 
Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...
Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...
Creating Aging Friendly Communities in Wisconsin: How Prepared is Your Commun...
 
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
 
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
Why Public Policy Education is Extension's Long-Standing Approach for Working...
 
Leadership"
Leadership"Leadership"
Leadership"
 
Integrating Sustainability-3
Integrating Sustainability-3Integrating Sustainability-3
Integrating Sustainability-3
 
Integrating Sustainability
Integrating SustainabilityIntegrating Sustainability
Integrating Sustainability
 
Engaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build Opportunity
Engaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build OpportunityEngaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build Opportunity
Engaging Communities to Reduce Poverty and Build Opportunity
 
Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...
Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...
Relational Leadership: Building Politically Effective Relationships with Stak...
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
Strategies for Unlocking Knowledge Management in Microsoft 365 in the Copilot...
 
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source MilvusA Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
A Beginners Guide to Building a RAG App Using Open Source Milvus
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
 

Where Have All the Crop Acres Gone?

  • 1. “WHERE HAVE ALL THE CROP ACRES GONE?” Bryce Larson, Calumet County UW-Extension Agriculture Educator Special thank you to Connie Leonhard our program assistant for her talents and assistance with this project October 21, 2010
  • 2. How this project began • Mary Kohrell, Calumet County UW-Extension Resource Development Educator, invited me to attend a Calumet County Working Lands Committee Meeting, and that is the event that triggered my interest in researching information and data that resulted in the following presentation.
  • 3. Farm Land Disappearance Nationwide 1964-2007 • From 1964 to 2007 the United States lost 188,092,000 acres of land in farms or the equivalent of 5.3 states the size of Wisconsin. During that time the US also lost 27,808,000 acres of crop land but showed an increase of 22,716,000 acres of the crop land available that was harvested.
  • 4. Time Line and Selected States • I will be using data and information from the 1987-2007 Ag Census data for the remainder of this summary on the disappearance of farm land, crop land, and harvested crop land from the IA, IL, IN, MI, MN, and WI and the selected counties I have chosen to highlight.
  • 5. Animal Unit Statistics • I am also using Ag Census data to calculate the 1,000 lbs. animal units (AU) in each state and the changes in numbers from 1987-2007. For these calculations I have included dairy and beef cows, heifers and feed lot animals, swine inventory herd, hogs fed and slaughtered, laying hens, and broilers or meat birds. I am using the NRCS animal unit conversion numbers to equate the various animal units to 1,000 lbs. unit increments that are used for converting varying animal species to a standardized number.
  • 6. US and Selected States Population • I am using the April 2008 US, state, and county population data to calculate the human populations and the per capita calculations on land lost from farms, crop land, and harvested crop land. • The United States in 2008 was estimated to have 304 million citizens which translates into 80 persons per square mile.
  • 7. Farm Land Loss Trends • As one reviews the data from the US and the six states including Wisconsin, there are some trends that become very evident. • The majority of land in farms lost in the US occurred from 1964 to 1987. • Good quality crop land in the US and in most states is continuing to disappear and at faster rates than land in farms is disappearing. This would indicate that good crop land is being utilized for other types of developments and usage. Land in farms that is unsuitable for cropping is in many cases unsuitable for many other uses. • Harvested crop land continues to increase in the five states with the exception of Wisconsin. To me this means that our remaining crop land is being utilized more intensively and to grow either wheat or row crops such as corn and soybeans.
  • 8. USA Farmland loss (continued) • Wisconsin has had the largest loss of land in farms, crop land and is the only state of the 6 that has lost harvested crop land over the last 20 years. • Not only have we lost the highest percentage of farm land and crop land we have lost the most absolute acres of crop land. Only Michigan has fewer crop acres than Wisconsin yet we lost 1.5 million acres of crop land over the last 20 years. Some our neighboring states have twice as many crop acres as does Wisconsin and yet lost less total crop land. • On a per capita basis Wisconsin consumes land in farms and crop land at many fold the rate of our neighboring 5 states.
  • 9. Wisconsin 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms Loss of 1,416,000 acres -8.51% Crop land Loss of 1,502,000 -13% Harvested crop land Loss of 454,000 acres -4.84% April 2008 population estimate 5.63 million 99 persons per square mile
  • 10. Minnesota 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 26,000,000 28,000,000 30,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms Gain of 344,000 acres +1% Crop land Gain of 72,000 acres +.003% Harvested crop land Gain of 2,632,000 acres +15.8% April 2008 population estimate 5.2 million 62 persons per square mile
  • 11. Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms Loss of 891,000 acres -2.82% Crop land Loss of 974,000 acres -3.57% Harvested crop land Gain of 3,315,000 acres +16% April 2008 population estimate 3,002,000 52 persons per square mile 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 26,000,000 28,000,000 30,000,000 32,000,000 34,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 12. Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms Loss of 1,751,000 acres -3.3% Crop land Loss of 1,395,000 acres -5.56% Harvested crop land Gain of 2,509,000 acres +12.5% April 2008 population estimate 12,904,000 223 persons per square mile 18,000,000 20,000,000 22,000,000 24,000,000 26,000,000 28,000,000 30,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 13. Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms Loss of 285,000 acres -2.8% Crop land Loss of 378,000 acres -4.6% Harvested crop land Gain of 687,000 acres +11% April 2008 population estimate 10,003,000 175 persons per square mile 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 8,000,000 9,000,000 10,000,000 11,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 14. Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms Loss of 1,397,000 acres -8.7% Crop land Loss of 650,000 acres -6.5% Harvested crop acres Gain of 1,402,000 acres +9.4% April 2008 population estimate 6,376,000 170 persons per square mile 10,000,000 11,000,000 12,000,000 13,000,000 14,000,000 15,000,000 16,000,000 17,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 16. Brown County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 35,000 acres lost -15.8% Crop Land 47,000 acres lost -22.8% Harvested crop land 34,000 acres lost -19.7% Population 245,000 Per square mile 429 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 17. Calumet County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 18,000 acres lost -10.7% Crop Land 15,000 acres lost -10.4% Harvested crop land 9,000 acres lost -7% Population 45,000 Per square mile 127 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 140,000 150,000 160,000 170,000 180,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 18. Clark County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 5,000 acres lost -1.2% Crop Land 16,000 acres lost -5.2% Harvested crop land 15,000 acres gained +6% Population 34,000 Per square mile 28 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 19. Dane County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 34,000 acres lost -6% Crop Land 58,000 acres lost -12% Harvested crop land 2,000 acres lost -1% Population 483,000 Per square mile 355 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 600,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 20. Dodge County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 54,000 acres lost -12.4% Crop Land 25,000 acres lost -6.9% Harvested crop land 4,000 acres gained +1.2% Population 88,000 Per square mile 77 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 460,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 21. Dunn County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 17,000 acres lost -4.25% Crop Land 20,000 acres lost -7.4% Harvested crop land 3,000 acres lost -1.5% Population 43,000 Per square mile 47 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 22. Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 23,000 acres lost -6.4% Crop Land 21,000 acres lost -9.1% Harvested crop land 13,000 acres lost -4.9 Population 109,000 Per square mile 135 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 23. Jefferson County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 12,000 acres lost -4.7% Crop land 17,000 acres lost -8.2% Harvested crop land 3,000 acres gained +1.7 Population 81,000 Per square mile 133 150,000 170,000 190,000 210,000 230,000 250,000 270,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 24. Lafayette County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 30,000 acres lost -9.1% Crop land 44,000 acres lost -15% Harvested crop acres 8,000 acres lost -2.3% Population 16,000 Per square mile 26 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 25. Manitowoc County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 29,000 acres lost -10.5% Crop land 36,000 acres lost -15.3% Harvested crop land 29,000 acres lost -13.3% Population 81,000 Per square mile 140 150,000 170,000 190,000 210,000 230,000 250,000 270,000 290,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 26. Marathon County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 91,000 acres lost -15.7% Crop land 43,000 acres lost -11.8 % Harvested crop land 13,000 acres lost -4.3% Population 131,000 Per square mile 81 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 600,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 27. Outagamie County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 35,000 acres lost -12.5% Crop land 33,000 acres lost -13.7% Harvested crop land 19,000 acres lost -9.9% Population 175,000 Per square mile 252 175,000 195,000 215,000 235,000 255,000 275,000 295,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 28. Polk County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 26,000 acres lost -8.3% Crop land 29,000 acres lost -14.5% Harvested crop acres 11,000 acres lost -7.9% Population 44,000 Per square mile 45 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 29. Rock County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 14,000 acres lost -4% Crop land 22,000 acres lost -6.9% Harvested crop land 21,000 acres gained +8% Population 160,000 Per square mile 212 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000 330,000 350,000 370,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 30. Shawano County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 54,000 acres lost -16.6% Crop land 34,000 acres lost -15.25% Harvested crop land 19,000 acres lost -9.1% Population 41,000 Per square mile 46 150,000 170,000 190,000 210,000 230,000 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000 330,000 350,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 31. Sheboygan County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 18,000 acres lost -8.6% Crop land 22,000 acres lost -12.3% Harvested crop land 11,000 acres lost -7.1% Population 115,000 Per square mile 219 130,000 140,000 150,000 160,000 170,000 180,000 190,000 200,000 210,000 220,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 32. Taylor County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 22,000 acres lost -8.4% Crop land 12,000 acres lost -8.5% Harvested crop land 4,000 acres lost -3.4% Population 19,000 Per square mile 20 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 33. Trempealeau County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 25,000 acres lost -6.9% Crop land 41,000 acres lost -17.6% Harvested crop land 27,000 acres lost -15.3% Population 28,000 Per square mile 37 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 400,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 34. Washington County, Wisconsin Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 26,000 acres lost -16.7% Crop land 28,000 acres lost -21.2% Harvested crop land 19,000 acres lost -16.7% Population 130,000 Per square mile 273 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 140,000 150,000 160,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 35. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin (Milwaukee Metro Area) Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 4,300 acres lost -44% Crop land 3,100 acres lost -50% Harvested crop land 3,192 acres lost -45.5% Population 959,421 Per square mile 3,885 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 36. Waukesha County, Wisconsin (Milwaukee Metro Area) Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 30,100 acres lost -31.7% Crop land 37,100 acres lost -23.8% Harvested crop land 19,500 acres lost -23.8% Population 383,000 Per square mile 649 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 140,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 37. Kenosha County, Wisconsin (Milwaukee Metro Area) Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms -16.3% Crop land -19.2% Harvested crop land -7.5% Population 165,382 Per square mile 548 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 90,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 38. Racine County, Wisconsin (Milwaukee Metro Area) Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms -9.5% Crop land -10.7% Harvested crop land 0% Population 201,000 Per square mile 567 90,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 40. Blue Earth County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 13,000 acres gained +.5% Crop Land 0 acres gained or lost Harvested crop land 65,000 acres gained +21.5% Population 60,000 Per square mile 75 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 41. Dakota County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 26,000 acres gained +11.8% Crop Land 23,000 acres gained +11.8% Harvested crop land 50,000 acres gained +32% Population 642,000 Per square mile 624 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 42. Faribault County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 26,000 acres gained +6% Crop Land 28,000 acres gained +7% Harvested crop land 88,000 acres gained +26.7% Population 14,000 Per square mile 23 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 43. Houston County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 41,000 acres lost -14.5% Crop Land 36,000 acres lost -20% Harvested crop land 16,000 acres lost -13.3% Population 19,000 Per square mile 35 80,000 130,000 180,000 230,000 280,000 330,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 44. Olmstead County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 23,000 acres lost -7.2% Crop Land 30,000 acres lost -10.6% Harvested crop land 23,000 acres gained +12.5% Population 141,000 Per square mile 190 150,000 170,000 190,000 210,000 230,000 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000 330,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 45. Ottertail County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 23,000 acres gained +2.6% Crop Land 33,000 acres lost -5.3% Harvested crop land 7,000 acres gained +1.5% Population 51,000 Per square mile 29 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 46. Pipestone County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 2,000 acres lost -1% Crop Land 4,000 acres lost -2.0% Harvested crop land 22,000 acres gained +13.4% Population 9,400 Per square mile 21 150,000 170,000 190,000 210,000 230,000 250,000 270,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 47. Polk County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 22,000 acres gained +2.3% Crop Land 15,000 acres gained +1.6% Harvested crop land 85,000 acres gained +12.0 % Population 31,000 Per square mile 16 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,100,000 1,200,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 48. Stearns County, Minnesota Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 36,000 acres gained +5.4% Crop Land 6,000 acres gained +1% Harvested crop land 52,000 acres gained +12.5% Population 147,000 Per square mile 99 400,000 450,000 500,000 550,000 600,000 650,000 700,000 750,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 50. Boone County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 5,000 acres lost -1.5% Crop Land 40,000 acres lost -13.3% Harvested crop land 8,000 acres gained +3.2% Population 26,000 Per square mile 47 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 51. Butler County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 48,000 acres gained +14.6% Crop Land 47,000 acres gained +15.1% Harvested crop land 96,000 acres gained +42% Population 15,000 Per square mile 26 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 52. Clinton County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 19,000 acres gained +5% Crop land 19,000 acres gained +5.6% Harvested crop land 75,000 acres gained +29% Population 49,000 Per square mile 72 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000 330,000 350,000 370,000 390,000 410,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 53. Dallas County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 31,000 acres lost -9.5% Crop land 25,000 acres lost -8.7% Harvested crop land 21,000 acres gained +8.0% Population 60,000 Per square mile 70 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 54. Dubuque County Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 23,000 acres lost -6.9% Crop land 39,000 acres lost -11.2% Harvested crop land 3,000 acres gained +1.0% Population 93,000 Per square mile 147 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 55. Harrison County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 22,000 acres lost-5.7% Crop land 15,000 acres lost -4.6% Harvested crop land 33,000 acres gained +17.3% Population 15,350 Per square mile 23 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 56. Sioux County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 7,000 acres gained +1.3% Crop land 3,000 acres gained +1.0% Harvested crop land 78,000 acres gained +22.0% Population 32,000 Per square mile 41 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 500,000 520,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 57. Tama County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 14,000 acres gained +3.3% Crop land 13,000 acres gained +3.5% Harvested crop land 69,000 acres gained +25% Population 18,000 Per square mile 25 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000 330,000 350,000 370,000 390,000 410,000 430,000 450,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 58. Warren County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 62,000 acres lost -20.4 Crop land 95,000 acres lost -33.0% Harvested crop land 26,000 acres lost -16.7% Population 45,000 Per square mile 71 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 59. Wayne County, Iowa Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 8,000 acres lost -2.9% Crop land 51,000 acres gained +23.4% Harvested crop land 6,000 acres gained +5.0% Population 6,000 Per square mile 13 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 350,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 61. Henry County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 34,000 acres gained +7.4% Crop land 34,000 acres gained +8.25% Harvested crop land 42,000 acres gained +10.9% Population 50,000 Per square mile 62 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 460,000 480,000 500,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 62. Iroquois County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 1,000 acres lost -0.2% Crop land 13,000 acres gained +2.0% Harvested crop land 12,000 acres gained +1.2% Population 30,000 Per square mile 28 540,000 560,000 580,000 600,000 620,000 640,000 660,000 680,000 700,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 63. Kane County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 15,000 acres lost -7.25% Crop land 15,000 acres lost -7.4% Harvested crop land 17,000 acres lost -8.2% Population 506,000 Per square mile 777 150,000 160,000 170,000 180,000 190,000 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 64. LaSalle County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 56,000 acres gained +9.5% Crop land 61,000 acres gained +11.1% Harvested crop land 64,000 acres gained +11.9% Population 113,000 Per square mile 98 480,000 500,000 520,000 540,000 560,000 580,000 600,000 620,000 640,000 660,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 65. McLean County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 21,000 acres lost -3.4% Crop land 19,000 acres lost -2.9% Harvested crop land 16,000 acres lost -2.5% Population 165,000 Per square mile 127 550,000 600,000 650,000 700,000 750,000 800,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 66. Madison County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 29,000 acres gained +10.2% Crop land 37,000 acres gained +14.9% Harvested crop land 56,000 acres gained +19.8% Population 268,000 Per square mile 357 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 67. St. Clair County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 48,000 acres gained +18% Crop land 46,000 acres gained +19.2% Harvested crop land 48,000 acres gained +20.8% Population 263,000 Per square mile 386 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 68. Stephenson County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 29,000 acres gained +9.3% Crop land 33,000 acres gained +10.4% Harvested crop land 42,000 acres gained +16.6% Population 46,000 Per square mile 87 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 69. Wayne County, Illinois Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 11,000 acres gained +3.7% Crop land 10,000 acres gained +3.6% Harvested crop land 23,000 acres gained +10.2% Population 16,000 Per square mile 24 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 71. Allen County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 37,000 acres lost -12.7% Crop land 27,000 acres lost -10.5% Harvested crop land 3,000 acres lost -1.4% Population 350,000 Per square mile 505 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 250,000 260,000 270,000 280,000 290,000 300,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 72. Clinton County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 8,000 acres gained +3.2% Crop land 16,000 acres gained +6.9% Harvested crop land 45,000 acres gained +12.3% Population 34,000 Per square mile 84 180,000 190,000 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 250,000 260,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 73. Elkhart County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 42,000 acres lost -20.5% Crop land 37,000 acres lost -20.7% Harvested crop land 11,000 acres lost -7.5% Population 200,000 Per square mile 394 120,000 130,000 140,000 150,000 160,000 170,000 180,000 190,000 200,000 210,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 74. Greene County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 32,000 acres lost -15.4% Crop land 25,000 acres lost -17.4% Harvested crop land 6,000 acres gained +5.7% Population 33,000 Per square mile 61 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 75. Harrison County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 30,000 acres lost -16.2% Crop land 23,000 acres lost -19.9% Harvested crop land 11,000 acres gained +14.8% Population 37,000 Per square mile 71 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 76. Jackson County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 7,000 acres lost -3.25% Crop land 2,000 acres lost -1.2% Harvested crop land 37,000 acres gained +21.0% Population 42,000 Per square mile 81 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 77. Knox County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 18,000 acres gained +5.8% Crop land 24,000 acres gained +12.4% Harvested crop land 80,000 acres gained +35.8% Population 38,000 Per square mile 76 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 78. Lake County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 17,000 acres lost -11.8% Crop land 16,000 acres lost -13.0% Harvested crop land 15,000 acres lost -11.3% Population 493,000 Per square mile 975 110,000 115,000 120,000 125,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 79. Marion County, Indiana Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 40,000 acres lost -70.2% Crop land 34,000 acres lost -69.2% Harvested crop land 28,000 acres lost -68.3% Population 880,000 Per square mile 2,173 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 81. Alpena County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 14,000 acres lost -17.1% Crop land 5,000 acres gained +9.0% Harvested crop land 11,000 acres gained +31.0% Population 34,000 Per square mile 55 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 82. Calhoun County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 25,000 acres lost -9.9% Crop land 19,000 acres lost -9.8% Harvested crop land 25,000 acres gained +18.9% Population 136,000 Per square mile 195 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 83. Claire County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 0 acres gained or lost 0% Crop land 10,000 acres lost -20.8% Harvested crop land 1,000 acres lost -3.6% Population 30,000 Per square mile 55 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 84. Clinton County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 15,000 acres gained +5.8% Crop land 13,000 acres gained +5.9% Harvested crop land 41,000 acres gained +23.1% Population 70,000 Per square mile 113 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 85. Kent County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 34,000 acres lost -16.7% Crop land 31,000 acres lost -19.1% Harvested crop land 4,000 acres lost -3.3% Population 605,000 Per square mile 671 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 86. Lapeer County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 43,000 acres lost -19.7% Crop land 20,000 acres lost -11.4% Harvested crop land 10,000 acres lost -8.0% Population 91,000 Per square mile 134 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 220,000 240,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 87. Lenawee County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 4,000 acres gained +1% Crop land 5,000 acres lost -1.7% Harvested crop land 8,000 acres gained +3.1% Population 101,000 Per square mile 130 250,000 270,000 290,000 310,000 330,000 350,000 370,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 88. Menominee County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 14,000 acres lost -11.9% Crop land 4,000 acres lost -6.25% Harvested crop land 10,000 acres gained +20% Population 24,000 Per square mile 24 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 110,000 120,000 130,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 89. Muskegon County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 2,000 acres lost -2.5% Crop land 1,000 acres gained +1.3% Harvested crop land 8,000 acres gained +18.2% Population 174,000 Per square mile 334 40,000 45,000 50,000 55,000 60,000 65,000 70,000 75,000 80,000 85,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 90. Oakland County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 27,000 acres lost -55% Crop land 28,000 acres lost -58.4% Harvested crop land 19,000 acres lost -57.6% Population 1,202,000 Per square mile 1,368 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 91. Saginaw County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 16,000 acres gained +5.2% Crop land 9,000 acres lost -3.25% Harvested crop land 20,000 acres gained +8.1% Population 205,000 Per square mile 260 220,000 240,000 260,000 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 92. Sanilac County, Michigan Total % gain or loss over 20 years Land in farms 14,000 acres lost -3.25% Crop land 23,000 acres lost -5.9% Harvested crop land 32,000 acres gained +10.5% Population 42,064 Per square mile 46 280,000 300,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 380,000 400,000 420,000 440,000 460,000 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 Land in farms Crop land Harvested crop land
  • 93. Possible reasons Wisconsin may be losing farm land more quickly • Wisconsin was logged earlier and more quickly than most neighboring states due to our southern flowing rivers. That encouraged softwood harvest and the creation of several cities and towns throughout our rural northern portion of Wisconsin.
  • 97. Possible reasons Wisconsin may be losing farm land more quickly (continued) • The second wave of logging came with the advent of the railroad that allowed the harvest of the heavier hardwoods. Those millions of acres of cut over land created opportunities for immigrant farmers to settle and homestead many sections of northern Wisconsin. Transportation routes were created to move people and goods to and from these communities.
  • 98. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • During the late 1800s and early 1900s, Wisconsin agriculture under the guidance of W. D. Hoard moved from a wheat crop grain agriculture to a dairy and forage agriculture. • The number of farms and dairy cows continued to grow until the early 1950s when there were roughly 180,000 dairy farms in Wisconsin with 2.2 million dairy cows scattered throughout Wisconsin. • The need to transport a highly perishable product such as milk necessitated a dependable and expansive highway and road system. • Dairy, the manufacturing of dairy products, and the related industries require large amounts of labor; thus, many people and workers were needed to support the dairy industry.
  • 99. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Wisconsin has many more residents more recently tied to farm and rural life than our neighboring states do. • Wisconsin has a very strong local government governance system. How much more politically active and powerful our local township government is than our neighboring states, I do not know; but, we do have a very strong township form of government in Wisconsin.
  • 100. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Wisconsin residents have German as their major ancestry (43%) as compared to 15% for the USA. How much influence does national origin and culture have on our land use issues? The other states have the following rates of German as their major ancestry • MN 37% • IA 36% • ILL 20% • IN 23% • MI 20%
  • 101. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Due to many large rivers with dependable water supplies and the creation of many large reservoirs for managed water release and the reduction of spring flooding, electricity through hydro electric systems came quite quickly to rural Wisconsin. • The existing road ways for transporting dairy products created easements for power line systems to be installed. With good roads and electricity, rural life in Wisconsin was attractive even prior to World War II.
  • 102. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Many of the major manufacturing firms located in Eastern Wisconsin were seasonal companies for decades. The manufacturing of farm equipment was the major product and many dairy farmers worked in those plants during the winter and then the plants shut down major portions of their production during the summer. As the firms grew and their product lines developed, the need for year round production created good manufacturing jobs for many citizens.
  • 103. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Firms such as Kohler, Brillion Iron Works, the Manitowoc Company, Tecumseh, Ariens, etc. are just a few firms that grew with our dairy and rural agriculture sector.
  • 104. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Many of the acres farmed and cropped by dairy farmers have production limitations for row crops and large equipment. Much of our cut over dairy land, rolling glaciated farm land, and our bluff and coulee, drift less area does not allow for large expansive row crop agriculture; thus, as the dairy industry has been shrinking in some of these areas, so has the crop land and the harvested crop land.
  • 105. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • With modern day agriculture utilizing more capital investment to farm more acres with less labor, many of our smaller fields with slope limitations etc. do not allow the efficient use of equipment that has high capacity and also high ownership and operational costs. No-till, conservation tillage, and grazing have become more common place in many of these areas and is keeping these lands in agriculture production.
  • 106. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • With modern day agriculture utilizing more capital investment to farm more acres with less labor, many of our smaller fields with slope limitations etc. do not allow the efficient use of equipment that has high capacity and also high ownership and operational costs. No-till, conservation tillage, and grazing have become more common place in many of these areas and is keeping these lands in agriculture production.
  • 107. Bed Rock Map of Wisconsin
  • 108. Glacial Till and Terminal Moraines of Wisconsin
  • 109. Soil Regions of Wisconsin
  • 110. Potential Prime Farm Land in Wisconsin
  • 111. Ecological Tension Zone in Wisconsin
  • 112. Early Vegetation Map of Wisconsin
  • 113. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Dairy cows require a large land base per cow and replacement to be able to raise enough forage and grain to produce the large volumes of milk, maintain themselves, and grow replacements. • Considerable land is also needed to land-apply large volumes of semi-solid and liquid manure. • The fact that dairy cows utilize very bulky, wet feeds increases the need for significant storage capacity and also the need to transport bulky and wet feeds from growing sites to storage sites.
  • 114. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • Even though large dairy complexes can be built to take advantage of efficiencies of scale, the feed production area and the manure distribution area need to be large to adequately supply the dairy complex with sufficient feed and other land based resources. • This means that cows can be concentrated, but their feed, fiber, and manure distribution foot print is still very large.
  • 115. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • The Wisconsin legislature has passed several laws that have created credits or tax relief for land that remains in agriculture production. • Up until the most recent law on land taxed based on use, most of these programs, although beneficial to farmers, did not stop Wisconsin from being the state in this report that lost the most crop land over the last 20 years.
  • 116. Wisconsin’s faster crop land loss (continued) • The dairy industry in Wisconsin manufactures about 90 plus percent of the milk produced in the state. • The dairy manufacturing industry, along with the many other dairy-related businesses, creates a strong link between the rural farm, rural non farm, and even our suburban and urban citizens. • These close ties are great in making a 20 billion dollar per year industry work well, but the close relationship can and does also create use and space issues and constraints.
  • 117.
  • 118.
  • 119. Cows per crop acre 1987-2007 Selected Counties 1987 2007 County Cows Crop acres Crop acres/cow Cows Crop acres Crop acres /cow Brown 37,630 192,000 5.1 39,020 160,561 4.1 Calumet 29,544 144,800 4.9 28,222 128,524 4.3 Clark 64,571 308,557 4.77 64,438 291,609 4.52 Dane 65,246 474,688 7.2 51,454 417,244 8.1 Dodge 61,361 366,503 5.9 40,639 342,684 8.4 Dunn 40,174 271,106 6.7 23,143 250,765 10.8 Fond du Lac 51,742 307,598 5.9 47,256 279,922 5.9 Jefferson 24,532 207,051 8.4 14,669 190,189 12.9 Lafayette 44,054 294,200 6.69 30,737 249,866 8.12 Manitowoc 47,283 245,558 5.19 45,704 199,725 4.36 Marathon 75,983 356,789 4.56 62,840 323,614 5.14 Outagamie 43,504 240,719 5.5 37,681 207,537 5.5 Polk 29,643 201,026 8.1 16,540 172,203 10.3 Rock 23,165 320,063 13.75 11,862 298,238 25 Shawano 48,094 222,877 4.6 36,453 189,064 5.18 Sheboygan 29,158 179,257 6.15 26,022 157,607 6.0 Taylor 28,857 141,699 4.9 16,609 129,825 7.8 Trempealeau 33,144 233,334 7.0 21,811 192,305 8.8 Washington 23,753 131,753 5.5 14,772 104,273 7.0 WI average 1,743,427 11,618,876 6.8 1,249,309 10,116,279 8.1
  • 120. Animal Units /1,000 lbs. Equivalent State 1987 (millions) 2007 (millions) % Change Illinois Cattle and calves 1.9 1.2 -37 Swine herd 2.2 1.72 -22 Market hogs 1.3 2.67 +205 Laying hens NA 0.05 Broilers * * * Total AU 5.52 5.6 +1.4 Indiana Cattle and calves 1.3 0.9 -30 Swine herd 1.7 1.5 -12 Market hogs 1.2 2.0 +66 Laying hens N/A 0.24 Broilers 0.11 0.185 +68 Total AU 4.11 4.8 +17
  • 121. Animal Units /1,000 lbs. Equivalent State 1987 (millions) 2007 (millions) % Change Iowa Cattle and calves 4.3 4.0 -7 Swine herd 5.2 7.7 +48 Market hogs 4.0 9.3 +232 Laying hens N/A 0.55 Broilers 0.02 0.04 +200 Total AU 13.61 21.59 +59 Michigan Cattle and calves 1.1 1 -9 Swine herd 0.5 0.4 -20 Market hogs 0.6 0.6 0 Laying hens N/A .09 Broilers 0.01 .02 +200 Total AU 2.1 2.1 0
  • 122. Animal Units /1,000 lbs. Equivalent State 1987 (millions) 2007 (millions) % Change Minnesota Cattle and calves 2.7 2.4 -12 Swine herd 1.7 3.0 +76 Market hogs 1.2 5.0 +417 Laying hens N/A .11 0 Broilers 0.135 0.24 +460 Total AU 5.75 10.75 +87 Wisconsin Cattle and calves 4.1 3.4 -17 Swine herd .17 .6 -71 Market hogs .3 .2 -33 Laying hens N/A .05 0 Broilers .05 .23 +46 Total AU 4.95 4.03 -18
  • 123. Rural Population Stats State Total Population Total Rural Population Rural Population (as a % of state) % of State Ranking Total Farm Population Farm Population (as a % of state total) Non Farm Rural Population Non Farm Rural Population (as a % of state total) Illinois 12,419,293 1,508,961 12.2 41 127,879 1.0 1,381,082 11.1 Indiana 6,080,485 1,777,305 29.2 23 125,698 2.1 1,651,607 27.2 Iowa 2,926,324 1,139,641 38.9 14 171,374 5.9 968,267 33.1 Michigan 9,938,444 2,518,920 25.3 29 94,192 0.9 2,424,728 24.4 Minnesota 4,919,479 1,430,160 29.1 24 149,204 3.0 1,280,956 26.0 Wisconsin 5,363,675 1,698,538 31.7 20 137,115 2.6 1,561,423 29.1 USA 281,421,906 59,063,597 21.0 2,987,531 1.1 56,076,066 19.9
  • 124. Acres of crop land per rural resident State/Nation Crop acres per resident using 2002 USDA crop acres and 2000 USA Census USA 7.3 crop acres per rural resident Illinois 16 crop acres per rural resident Indiana 7.3 crop acres per rural resident Iowa 24 crop acres per rural resident Michigan 3.2 crop acres per rural resident Minnesota 16 crop acres per rural resident Wisconsin 6.3 crop acres per rural resident
  • 125. Income figures for each state State/Nation 1990 2006 Percent change USA $18,667 $36,714 +196 Illinois $20,159 $38,409 +190 Indiana $16,815 $32,288 +192 Iowa $16,683 $33,038 +198 Michigan $18,239 $33,788 +185 Minnesota $18,784 $38,859 +207 Wisconsin $17,399 $34,405 +198
  • 126. Average Agriculture land prices for 2009 (per acre) • Illinois – Average Ag land value $4,330 – Southern Illinois $3,400 – Central and Northern Illinois $5,500-$6,000 • Indiana – Average Ag land value $4,198 – 118 bu. corn average $3,238 – 150 bu. corn average $4,188 – 182 bu. corn average $5,169 • Iowa – Average Ag land value $4,371 – South Central lowest average value $2,537 – Northwest highest average value $5,364 – Central Iowa (3 districts 25 counties) $4,775
  • 127. Average Agriculture land prices for 2009 (per acre) • Michigan – Average $3,750 per acre – Poorer land average- $2,800 per acre – Better land average- $4,101 (not including fruit tree acres) • Minnesota – Average land price $2,870 – Poorer land averages $1,150 – Good crop land averages $4,750 • Wisconsin – Average of all agriculture land, all parcels $3,750 per acre – Bare land, parcels more than 35 acres not sold to relatives $3,190 per acre with average parcel size of 79-80 acres – North central average price is $1,856 per acre – South East average price is $5,376 per acre.
  • 128. Farm land legislation to protect farm land acres • Iowa • First Ag land protection bill 1939 • The states that have passed the most farm land protection or credit legislation are IA, MN and WI. • These are also states with the most cattle, the most German and Scandinavian ancestries. • As you can see however that in two out of the three states farm land loss has been minimal while in Wisconsin our historical farm land legislation has not been successful in saving farm land. • The latest taxation for use legislation is probably the most effective in saving farm land. The real question is who are the real beneficiaries of that legislation?
  • 129. Farm land legislation to protect farm land acres • The other three states Ill, IN an MI have passed less legislation on tax savings, tax credits but have been very pro active in working with right to farm legislation and thus in particular in southern MI which still has a significant dairy industry you see sizable livestock farm operations surrounded by developed land. This is also quite common in northern Ill and northern IN.
  • 130. What are my thoughts on our rapid and continuous loss of farm land and in particular our crop land? • Have we as a state grew faster in population than our neighbors? NO • Have we as a state had faster income gains than our neighbors? NO • Have we as a state grown our GDP faster than our neighbors? NO • Have we increased our business sector or manufacturing and service economies faster than our neighbors? NO
  • 131. If the answer to all these questions is NO, then what has Wisconsin gained by our extensive farm land and crop land losses?