Choosing the right team is often overlooked in this world of "shiny features" for CMSs. The process to choose the right CMS for the job is well worth the investment, but it's easy to get distracted, and forget that the people who lead your Content Team are equally, if not more important than the tools themselves.
17. How we buy content technology
We identify all the
shortcomings of our
system (real and
perceived)
We make a wish list to fit
the design of our new
presentation NOT our
new process.
We get demos from
vendors who show us all
the new stuff to
differentiate themselves.
Our
Wish
List
Vendor
New Stuff
All The Stuff
Our CMS
Doesn’t Do.
18. How we implement the same
The stuff we
don’t
understand.
We’ll wait for
phase 2 on
this
The rationalized the purchase
of the technology.
Our
Wish
List
Vendor
New Stuff
All The Stuff
Our CMS
Doesn’t Do.
19. All WCM’s fail
All WEM’s / SOE’s will fail too.
Smart Content Strategy & Good Technology
implementation – that enables CHANGE – is
what’s key.
How do we, as marketers, and content
strategists get to good implementation.
Conclusion:
25. It’s where most
content agencies start.
Google sez there’s
4 million ways to say
We listen to you...
We repeat it back...
We design it...
We develop it...
We help you maintain/measure it...
26. It’s time for marketing to step up
and YOU can be the catalyst
We must create and
communicate new processes
– anchored around an ability
to change.
Doesn’t matter whether it’s a
new WCMS, or WEM/CXM or
SOE
Deployment / implementation
is the critical factor.
35. 35
Robert Rose | @Rober_Rose
Scott Liewehr | @sliewehr
Digital Clarity Group | @just_clarity
Hinweis der Redaktion
Could’ve said interoperability, openness
Could’ve said interoperability, openness
Outline of the next 45 minutes
Break before
When buying a WCM system, it’s not just about looking for a system to manage web content.It’s about finding a system which aligns with your strategy and helps create the experience you want for your audience.
That is . . .The role of the software (and the vendor selection process) is diminished in comparison to role of implementation, integration, and incorporation of the software into a complete solution.
Enabling technology – aka functional requirementsGive me controlMake it easier (not harder)Help me do it fasterTell me what I don’t knowHelp me improve over timeAligned Philosophy -- Does the platform support your strategic orientation for your online presence?Customer service?Personalization?Channelization?Social?Globalization?Inspiring trajectory -- Judge the platform with the next five years in mind (as if you know what’s coming) Innovative and strategic Agile response to market Transparent roadmap Stable and supportivePartnership mentality – can be satisfied by vendor or agency Understands your needs;Sets clear expectations; “Gets” customer service;Plays nicely with others;Has a strong community
Key thing to remember: You’re dealing with PEOPLETherefore, very hard to evaluate. Reputations are helpful, but may be unreliable.Not like evaluating softwareEmpathetic – Do they get you? Whether it’s an industry vertical, market size, target audience, philosophical approach, etcCapable and fluent – Capable: Sys Integrator? Branding agency? Interactive agency? Staff Augmentation? Fluent: with the technology? Past, referenceable projects? Comfy enough to be flexible?Consistent – A team vs C team minimize this risk. Ask about documented process, knowledge transfer, turnover, how they staff projects with seniors v juniors, training, etc.Accountable – Do you have their attention? Senior enough relationship manager? Accountable to the needs of the org, meaning they know how to say NO?