2. âČ A debate is a discussion between two people/sides
âČ Centred around a topic/issue
(e.g Children should not have to wear school uniforms)
âČ Winner is the person/side that presented their argument the
best: its about persuasion, not how loud you can shout/argue!
âą Simulation of real parliamentary or senate debate
discussing: Regulation, Policy, Constitution, or
Problems happening in society
âą In parliamentary system we have: Government &
Opposition
ï resembling political parties in parliament that
runs legislatives (and probably also executives).
3. âČ One person speaks at a time, for a
given period of time (e.g. 2 minutes)
âČ No interrupting when someone is
speaking, but you can question them
when their time is up
âČ No shouting
âČ Don't get aggressive- remain calm!
4. Governmentâs Role Oppositionâs Role
Providing proposals,
solution, or idea of certain
kind of opinion
Negating the proposal or
the solution or the idea
provided by government.
Saying the proposal or the
idea is wrong or the status
quo is better.
5. Neutral ideas can be used by both teams ï depends on how they are shaped
and characterized.
THW(This House WouldâŠ.) ï ï ï ï proposal debate
argument yang disertai dengan solusi dan langkah-langkah yang harus
dilakukan
THBT (This House Believe ThatâŠ.) ï ï ï ï philosophical debate
benar atau salah, baik atau tidak, signifikan atau tidak, tanpa memberikan
solusi
6. ï§ Tell the motion, background,
definition,
ï§ Classified / tell room of debate and
team statement
ï§ Tell theme line, team split
ï§ Describe main arguments
ï§ Conclude the arguments with the
statement
âą Rebuttal first speaker
negative
âą Re team statement
âą Describe the arguments
âą Conclude the arguments
with the statement
âą Rebuttal all negative
speakers
âą Re team statement
âą Retell all arguments
âą Strengthen 1st and 2nd
speaker statements and
rebuttal all negative teams
statements
âą Give more relevant example
âą Conclude all and re team
statement
7. ASSERTION
REASONING
EVIDENCE
LINK BACK
Signposting, title of the points of
arguments or rebuttals
Principals, Chain of Logic, Nature of,
Characterization
Statistics, numbers, What has
happened, What might happen, What
might or might not be achieved,
evidence
Linking back to the motion and stance and goal
8. ï§ Response to 1st positive,
ï§ Rebuttal with team
statement
ï§ Tell theme line, team split
ï§ Describe main arguments
ï§ Conclude the arguments with
the statement
âą Rebuttal second speaker
positive
âą Rebuild the timeline
âą Describe the arguments
âą Conclude the arguments
with the statement
âą Rebuttal all positive
speakers
âą Rebuild the timeline
âą Retell all arguments
âą Strengthen 1st and 2nd
speaker statements and
rebuttal all negative teams
statements
âą Give more relevant example
âą Conclude all and re team
statement
9. ï§ Donât just question the arguments, answer the question by oneself in
accordance with the teamâs stance and advantages
ï§ Donât just say the argument or example is wrong or invalid or unclear,
but must prove why or the otherwise in accordance with the teamâs
stance and advantages.
ï§ Clarify teamâs argument that has been questioned or rebutted by
opponent ï Be responsive!
ï§ Engage with every possible opponentâs case! Refute them!
ï§ REMEMBER AREL! ï Basically the structure of Rebuttal is not
really different from Argument
ï§ Clash a principal or characterization with the same principal or object
of characterization but with opposite point of view!