The current study intends to represent scientific arguments that support the research on a city project for Bogotá, that is, a city crowdsourcing platform. In the article we come across how a public administration have to set the mission and goals based on legitimacy in order to work and how technology can be used in the framework of e-government and open government to meet citizens and government goals by using a crowdsourcing platform for dual participation and co-creation decision making for the public sector.

2. PRESENTATION

3. AGENDA
1. Introduction
public value: organizational strategy for public sectors.
3. E-Government
4. Open Innovation
5. Crowdsourcing
6. Open Government
7. Research context
8. Current research status
9. Conclusions
10.References

4. 1
INTRODUCTION
Ministry of ICT of Colombia (MinTIC, 2014) filed the act
2573 of 2014 where established the general directions
of the electronic government
strategy. Recommendations of the Organization for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OCDE) and
Open Government promote more
open, participative and innovative
approaches allowing citizens to have access to open
data to foster public use.

5. CREATING PUBLIC VALUE
substantively
valuable
legitimate and
political
sustainable
operationally and
administrable
2

6. 3
E-GOVERNMENT
Source: (United Nations, & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA), 2002, p. 1, Means & Schneider,
2002, p. 121, Duffy, 2001 , Brown & Brudney, J, L., 2001, Riasco & Giordano, 2008)

7. 4
OPEN INNOVATION
closed innovation model versus open innovation model. Chesbrough (2003, 2006)
Source: closed innovation model versus open innovation model. Chesbrough (2003, 2006)

8. 5
CROWDSOURCING
Source: (Agrawal, Catalini, & Goldfarb, 2011, Seltzer & Mahmoudi,
2013; Brabham, 2008)

9. 6
OPEN GOVERNMENT
Source: Wikipedia (accessed 5/30/2015)

10. 7
OPEN GOVERNMENT
Source: Information flow in a ideal Open Government System,
(Gavelin, Burall, & Wilson, 2009)

11. 8
OPEN GOVERNMENT
Source: Hilgers & Ihl, (2010)

12. 9
OPEN GOVERNMENT
Source: Framework for citizen engaged governance (Hilgers & Ihl, 2010)

13. 10
RESEARCH CONTEXT
á
á

14. 11
CURRENT RESEARCH STATUS
Source: own creation.

15. 12
CONCLUSIONS

16. 13
REFERENCES
Agrawal, Catalini, & Goldfarb. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding.
Alujas Ramírez. (2011). Gobierno Abierto y Modernización de la Gestión Pública. Tendencias actuales y el
(Inevitable) Camino que Viene-Reflexiones Seminales (Open Government and Modernization of Public
Management: Current Trends and the (Inevitable) Way Forward-Seminal Reflections). Revista Enfoques: Ciencia
Política y Administración Pública, 9(15), 99-125.
Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: the
international journal of research into new media technologies, 14(1), 75-90.
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing Public Participation.
Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application.
Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1122-1145. http://doi.org/10.1080/13691181003624090
Brown, M. M., & Brudney, J, L. (2001). Achieving advanced electronic government services: An examination of
obstacles and implications from an international perspective. Paper presented at the National Public Management
Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
Chapman, R., & Hunt, M. (1987). Open Government. A study of the prospects of open government within the
limitations of the British political system, Routledge, London.
Chesbrough. (2003). Open innovation -The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology.
Cohen, & Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovatión. Administrative
Science Quarterly, Volume 35, Issue I: Tecnology, Organization and Innovation, 35, 128, 152.
Duffy, D. (2001). Q&A: Balancing the role of e-Government: Interview with Mike Hernon, vice president of
egovernment for New York City-based GovWorks.
Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon.
Gavelin, K., Burall, S., & Wilson, R. (2009). Open Government: beyond static measures A paper produced by Involve
for the OECD.
Hilgers, D., & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The
International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 67-88.

17. 14
REFERENCES
Howe, J. (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing, Wired, 14(6). Retrieved from
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.htm
Huizingh, E. . (2010). Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives.
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for Innovation: The role of openess in explaining innovation performance
among UK manufacturing firms.
Lévy, P., & Bonomo, R. (1999). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus
Publishing.
Means, G., & Schneider, D. (2002). Meta-capitalism: The e-business revolution and the design of 21st century
companies and markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
MinTIC. (2014). Decreto Gobierno en línea.
Moore, M., H. (1997). Creating public value.
Riasco, S. ., & Giordano, G. . (2008). Riascos, S. C., Giordano, G. M., & Solano, O. J. El Gobierno Electrónico como
estrategia de participación ciudadana en la Administración pública a nivel de Suramérica-Casos Colombia y
Uruguay.
Seltzer, & Mahmoudi. (2013). Citizen Participation, Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing.
Surowiecki. (2005). The wisdom of crowds.
United Nations, & American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A
global perspective. New York, NY: U.N. Publications.
Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT press.
Wikipedia. (2013). “Open Government.” Wikipedia.org. Last Modified on July 11, 2013.
Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward.

18. 2
AGENDA