2. EVIDENCE OF AN ATTACHMENT
• Proximity seeking
• Separation distress
• Joy on reunion
• General disorientation (for behaviour towards the
other person- interaction and engagement)
3. THE LEARNING THEORY
• Classical conditioning
– The person that feeds the infant becomes associated with
the food, bringing pleasure; association between the
individual and pleasure leads to an attachment bond
– Pavlov’s dog study
• Operant conditioning
– A type of learning that takes place because of actions and
rewards that would reinforce the behaviour
• Social learning
– Role models
4. BOWLBY’S EVOLUTIONARY THEORY
• Survival
– Babies form attachments in order to survive; infants require adults to
feed, care for and protect them, and humans have evolved so that
babies have innate tendencies to form attachments
• Monotropy
– A single attachment to one person who is most important to the baby
• Internal working model
– Attachments at a young age provide a template for all future
relationships
• Sensitive/critical period
– If attachments are not formed within the first 3 years of a child’s life, it
can have serious consequences for future relationships, as attachments
will not form outside of this period
5. AINSWORTH’S STRANGE SITUATION
STUDY
• 8 stages
– Mother and child introduced to the room
– Mother and child left alone to investigate toys
– Stranger enters and approaches child
– Mother leaves and stranger interacts with child
– Mother returns to comfort child
– Child left alone
– Stranger returns and tries to engage with child
– Mother returns to comfort child and stranger leaves
• easy to replicate
• low ecological validity
• demand characteristics
• ethical issue- psychological harm
6. AINSWORTH’S TYPES OF ATTACHMENT
• Secure (70%)
– Baby uses mother as a safe base and is happy to explore
– Gets distressed with mother leaves
– When mother returns, baby quickly settles down and plays again
• Insecure-avoidant (15%)
– Baby shows some distress when mother leaves
– Doesn’t seek comfort on reunion; can be comforted by strangers
• Insecure-resistant (15%)
– Easily distressed when mother leaves
– On reunion, baby alternates between seeking comfort and
rejecting it
7. COLLECTIVIST VS. INDIVIDUALIST
• Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg
– Most common = secure
– Non-Western countries- more collectivist
– Western countries- insecure-avoidant
– China- 50/50 split between two insecure types
• based on strange situation study, so there is potential for having
all variables controlled in the same way, meaning that results can
be compared with other researchers
• mixture of collectivist and individualist cultures
• each study that was compared were slightly different to each
other, so comparisons may not be reliable
• ethical issues- distress to infants
• small sample- only one study in the UK, Sweden and China
8. DISRUPTION OF ATTACHMENT
• Separation- child is away from the caregiver they are
attached to for a relatively short time, just hours or days.
• Deprivation- the loss of something that is wanted or needed,
a long-term or even permanent loss
• Stages of disruption
– Protest- few hours, crying, panicking etc.
– Despair- day or two, withdrawn, eat/sleep less
– Detachment- alert, ‘recovered’, possible permanent damage to
attachment
• Robertson & Robertson
– Short term separation can have very bad effects or possible
permanent damage to an attachment
9. THE PDD MODEL
• PDD Model
– Separating a child from its caregivers should be avoided
– Children in foster care do better than those in an
institutionalised setting; they can cope with the
separation if they still receive one-on-one emotional
support
– Many factors influence a child’s reaction to separation
which might not necessarily produce the PDD effects
10. BOWLBY- 44 JUVENILE THEIVES
• Bowlby
– 44 teens who were convicted of stealing, 44 teens who
had never stolen anything but were still ‘emotionally
disturbed’
– 17 thieves had frequent separation before the age of 2
from the convicted group, but only 2 from the control
group
– Deprivation has harmful long-term consequences
• cannot determine cause/effect or explain any
extraneous variables
11. LONG TERM EFFECTS OF SEPARATION
• Affectionless psychopathology
– As seen in the 44 juvenile thieves
• Anaclitic depression
– Appetite loss, sleeplessness, impaired social and
intellectual development
• Deprivation dwarfism
– Physically underdeveloped
12. PRIVATION
• Privation- never forming a bond with a caregiver
• Genie
– Never formed an attachment, discovered at 13- physically
underdeveloped
– After a lot of help, she learned some language, but her social
and intellectual skills never fully developed
• Czech twins
– Locked in a cellar, found at the age of 7 with rickets and very
little social or intellectual development
– They made lots of progress after being adopted, and had
above average intelligence and normal social relationships
by the time they reached adulthood.
13. GENIE VS. CZECH TWINS
• Length/Age
– Czech twins had more time to develop because they were found at a
younger age
• Experiences
– Twins were kept together so they became attached to each other but
Genie was alone
• Quality of care
– The twins were adopted but Genie was put in an institution so it would
have been harder to form attachments there
• cannot generalise findings
• mixed results
• more controlled, scientific evidence needed, but ethically wrong
to put children in situations of privation
14. HODGES & TIZARD
• Hodges & Tizard
– 65 children in residential nursery before they were 4 months old
– They had no chance to form close attachments
– By the age of 4, some were adopted, some stayed at the nursery and
some were returned to their mothers
– Children can recover from early privation if they are in a good quality,
loving environment, although their social development is not as good as
children without privation
– The adopted children showed strong family relationships, where others
showed poorer relationships
• natural experiment- high ecological validity
• supported by Rutter (Romanian orphans)- adopted have a
better chance than those not adopted
• small sample- hard to generalise results
15. THE EFFECTS OF DAYCARE
• Clarke-Stewart
– Peer relationship study- 2/3 year olds experienced daycare and
were good at coping in social situations
– Strange situation replication- 18 month olds with high intensity
daycare were found to have a direct relationship between distress
levels and their low intensity daycare
– controlled, easily replicated
– lacks ecological validity, cannot generalise
• Belsky & Rovine
– Children who received daycare were more likely to have insecure
attachments, and children with no daycare were more securely
attached
– controlled, supported by other research in the area
– lacks ecological validity
16. WHAT IS GOOD DAYCARE?
• Good staff training
• Adequate space
• Appropriate toys and activities
• Good ratio of staff to children
• Minimal turnover so that children form stable
attachments with the carers