A Novel Framework for Credit Card. Shakas Technologies ( Galaxy of Knowledge) #11/A 2nd East Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Vellore - 632006. Mobile : +91-9500218218 / 8220150373| land line- 0416- 3552723 Shakas Training & Development | Shakas Sales & Services | Shakas Educational Trust|IEEE projects | Research & Development | Journal Publication | Email : info@shakastech.com | shakastech@gmail.com | website: www.shakastech.com​ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Shakas-Technologies

1. Base paper Title: A Novel Framework for Credit Card Fraud Detection
Modified Title: A Unique Structure for Identifying Credit Card Fraud
Abstract
Credit card transactions have grown considerably in the last few years. However, this
increase has led to significant financial losses around the world. More than that, processing the
enormous amount of generated data becomes very challenging, making the datasets highly
dimensional and unbalanced. This means the collected data is suffering from two major
problems. It is characterized by a severe difference in observation frequency between fraud
and non-fraud transactions, and it contains irrelevant, inappropriate, and correlated data that
negatively affects their prediction performance. Consequently, it has attracted the interest of
machine learning (ML), which has become a significant actor in fraud detection. ML has
provided methods such as Logistic Regression (LR), Support vector machines (SVM),
Decision Trees (DT), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). However, these
methods cannot meet the outstanding performance required to detect and predict unusual fraud
patterns. In this regard, the contribution of this paper is to propose a framework for fraud
detection (FFD). At first, to overcome the unbalanced data problem, the framework uses an
undersampling technique. Next, a feature selection (FS) mechanism is applied to select only
relevant features. Then, a Support Vector Data Description (SVDD) is used to build the ML
model. SVDD aims to create a tight boundary around regular data points to distinguish them
from potential outliers or anomalies. In order to enhance optimization capability for its
hyperparameters C and σ, a modified version of the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
algorithm, Polynomial Self Learning PSO (PSLPSO), is proposed. As a result, the framework’s
effectiveness is shown in the experimental results on a real credit card transaction dataset.
Existing System
The emergence of digital payment systems, such as mobile wallets, contactless
payments, and online payment platforms, has made it easier and more convenient for people
to use their credit cards for transactions. These systems provide a seamless and secure way to
purchase in physical stores and online. The rapid growth of e-commerce has been a
significant driver of credit card transactions. With the rise of online shopping, consumers
increasingly rely on credit cards to purchase on various e-commerce platforms. Credit cards’

2. convenience, security, and flexibility make them a popular choice for online transactions.
Mobile banking apps provided by financial institutions have made it simpler for consumers to
manage their credit cards and make transactions on the go. These apps enable users to check
their account balances, view transaction history, and make payments using their smartphones,
contributing to the overall increase in credit card transactions. Mobile banking apps provided
by financial institutions have made it simpler for consumers to manage their credit cards and
make transactions on the go. These apps enable users to check their account balances, view
transaction history, and make payments using their smartphones, contributing to the overall
increase in credit card transactions. The industry has made significant advancements in credit
card security. These measures help protect against fraud and increase consumers’ confidence
in using their credit cards for transactions.
Drawback in Existing System
 False Positives: One significant issue is the generation of false positives—legitimate
transactions mistakenly flagged as fraudulent. This can inconvenience customers by
declining valid transactions, leading to frustration and potentially impacting the user
experience.
 Complexity in Adaptive Fraud Techniques: Fraudsters continuously develop
sophisticated methods to mimic legitimate transactions, making it difficult for detection
systems to differentiate between fraudulent and genuine activities.
 Resource Intensive: Implementing and maintaining robust fraud detection systems
requires significant resources, including advanced technology, skilled personnel, and
ongoing updates to algorithms and databases.
 Data Privacy Concerns: The collection and analysis of vast amounts of transactional
data raise privacy concerns. There's a delicate balance between gathering enough data
to detect fraud and respecting customer privacy.
Proposed System
 Real-time Transaction Monitoring: Enhance real-time monitoring capabilities to
swiftly detect and respond to suspicious transactions. This includes analyzing
transactional data instantly and employing automated alerts for potentially fraudulent
activities.
 Behavioral Biometrics: Utilize behavioral biometrics, such as keystroke dynamics,
mouse movement patterns, or unique interaction behaviors, to supplement traditional

3. authentication methods and enhance fraud detection accuracy without inconveniencing
users.
 Hybrid Models: Combine rule-based systems with machine learning approaches to
create a hybrid model. This allows for predefined rules to catch obvious fraud attempts
while machine learning continuously learns and adapts to new fraud patterns.
 Unsupervised Learning for Anomaly Detection: Implement unsupervised learning
techniques to detect anomalies in transactional behavior without relying solely on
predefined rules. This method helps in identifying previously unknown fraud patterns.
Algorithm
 Logistic Regression: Often used as a baseline model to classify transactions as
fraudulent or legitimate based on various features.
 Random Forest: Effective in handling large datasets and capturing complex
relationships between features.
 Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM): Builds multiple models sequentially to improve
predictive accuracy.
 Clustering Algorithms (e.g., K-Means, DBSCAN): Group transactions based on
similarity to identify outliers or anomalies.
 Autoencoders: Neural network-based models used for anomaly detection by
reconstructing input data and identifying deviations.
 Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN): Suitable for processing sequential data and can
identify patterns within transaction sequences.
 Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM): Effective
for processing temporal sequences in transaction data.
Advantages
 Real-time Detection: These systems operate in real time or near real time, swiftly
flagging potentially fraudulent transactions as they occur. This immediate response
helps prevent further unauthorized use of the card.
 Regulatory Compliance: These systems aid financial institutions in adhering to
regulatory requirements by implementing robust fraud prevention measures and
protecting customer data.
 Adaptability and Learning: Fraud detection systems continually learn and adapt to new
fraud patterns and tactics, improving their accuracy over time. Machine learning

4. algorithms evolve based on new data, enhancing their ability to detect sophisticated
fraud attempts.
 Early Warning System: They serve as an early warning system, providing alerts to both
cardholders and financial institutions about suspicious activities, enabling proactive
measures to mitigate potential risks.
Software Specification
 Processor : I3 core processor
 Ram : 4 GB
 Hard disk : 500 GB
Software Specification
 Operating System : Windows 10 /11
 Frond End : Python
 Back End : Mysql Server
 IDE Tools : Pycharm