ITP / SED Day 6
•
4 gefällt mir•1,030 views
Second day of the week two of lectures at Aalto University School of Economics’ ITP summer programme’s Strategy and Experience. https://itp.hse.fi/ Contents: Interaction design, designing for flow, prototyping
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (11)
Ähnlich wie ITP / SED Day 6
Ähnlich wie ITP / SED Day 6 (20)
Mehr von Sami Niemelä
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
ITP / SED Day 6
- 1. 06 Strategy & Experience Design ITP 2011 Aalto University School of Economics Sami Niemelä Creative Director, Nordkapp sami.niemela@gmail.com @samin — www.nordkapp.fi — @Nordkapp
- 3. “Interaction Design is the creation of a dialogue between a person and a product, service or system.” —Jon Kolko in Thoughts on Interaction Design
- 4. The Larger Context(s) graph Ville Tikka / wevolve.us
- 6. Empathy http://www.openideo.com/open/maternal-health/inspiration/empathy-belly-/
- 7. business designer “user” technology
- 10. “Complexity is good. Simplicity can be misleading.” user experience wheel http://userexperienceproject.blogspot.com/ visualisation Facebook usage
- 11. “…but complexity is good only if it is understandable, sensible, and meaningful.” boxee remote http://boxee.tv
- 12. “As we learn to “intuitively” use a product, we are in fact illustrating the scope of our past experiences with it.“ —Jon Kolko in Thoughts on Interaction Design
- 15. Usable
- 17. Useful
- 19. Desirable
- 23. DESIGNING FOR FLOW Attention and Flow
- 24. CAUSES OF FLOW 1— A clear goal 2—Immediate feedback 3—A challenge you’re confident with
- 25. CHARACTERISTICS OF FLOW —Total concentration and focus —A sense of control over interactions —Openness to new things —Increased exploratory behavior —Increased learning —Positive feelings
- 26. CONSEQUENCES OF FLOW —Loss of consciousness of self —Distortions in the perception of time —Activity is perceived as intrinsically rewarding
- 27. “As we learn to “intuitively” use a product, we are in fact illustrating the scope of our past experiences with it.“ —Jon Kolko in Thoughts on Interaction Design
- 28. 0 challenges high Anxiety skills Flow Channel Boredom high Anxiety, Boredom and Flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990) (captions added van Gorp, 2006)
- 29. Causes of Flow
- 30. 1 2 Immediate 3 Challenge balanced A clear goal feedback with one’s skills
- 31. Different users
- 32. Less Challenges More Challenges Novice users Experienced users Less Exploration Exploration Entertainment Connected with tasks
- 34. EXAMPLE “Produce a podcast” — Collect Information — Interview Someone — Record My Parts — Edit Audio — Mix audio — Write Show Notes — Produce the files — Upload Files to Host — Build Corresponding Show Notes Post
- 35. EXAMPLE — Input- audio mix from GarageBand 3 and Show Notes in Text Editor. — Work- Play through audio once, listening for big mistakes. — Send the file to iTunes. — Inside iTunes, select the file, choose Get Info. — Edit info, inserting show notes and links into Lyrics tab. Doublecheck. —Choose “Convert File to MP3.” —Play the new MP3 file once it’s converted. —Move MP3 file to upload area. —Output- Upload Files to Host flow
- 36. HIGH LEVEL FLOW HOME VIEW SUBCATEGORY 1 SUBCATEGORY 2 PRODUCT DETAILS PURCHASE PATHS X N
- 37. IN DETAIL
- 39. EXERCISE Flesh out your scenario from week one into a task flow. Design the interactions within it. 60 MINUTES
- 52. UI SCENARIOS
- 53. EXERCISE Prototyping: Build a prototype of an interaction relating your project. Draw it out on paper, step by step. 90 MINUTES
- 54. Document your work: the task flows and prototype, send by email. FRI HOMEWORK WHERE? Deliver to sami.niemela@gmail.com w/ title “GROUPNAME Flows and prototype”
- 55. Design Review of team project: show & tell of design process + progress so far, design critique. THU WHERE? Present at class on Thursday Deliver to sami.niemela@gmail.com w/ title “GROUPNAME Design Review 1 ”
- 56. Q&A time!