Weitere ähnliche Inhalte Ähnlich wie Disruptive Technology - Why large companies often fail to innovate (20) Kürzlich hochgeladen (20) Disruptive Technology - Why large companies often fail to innovate6. © NORMAN HIOB
WHAT MAKES
SENSE IS
PRIMARILY
SHAPED BY
THEIR VALUE
NETWORK
© NORMAN HIOB
13. © NORMAN HIOB
RESOURCE DEPENDENCE
COMPANIES FREEDOM
OF ACTION IS LIMITED TO
SATISFYING THE NEEDS
OF EXTERNAL ENTITIES
19. © NORMAN HIOB
THE TECHNOLOGY S-CURVEProductperformance
Time or engineering effort
Richard N. Foster: „Innovation: The attacker's advantage“, New York, Summit Book, 1986
OFTEN USED TO
PREDICT NEW
TECHNOLOGIES
20. © NORMAN HIOB
THE TECHNOLOGY S-CURVEProductperformance
Time or engineering effort
Richard N. Foster: „Innovation: The attacker's advantage“, New York, Summit Book, 1986
DECREASING RATE OF
IMPROVEMENT INDICATES
THAT A NEW TECHNOLOGY
MAY EMERGE
22. © NORMAN HIOB
#1 Sustaining technologies
IMPROVES
PRODUCT
PERFORMANCE
Productperformance
Time or engineering effort
Technology #1
Technology #2
Technology #3
Clayton M. Christensen: „Exploring the Limits of the Technology S-Curve“, Productions and Operations Management 1, no. 4, 1992
24. © NORMAN HIOB
#2 Disruptive technologies
Technology #1
Technology #2
Technology #2
Application
(Market) „A“
Application
(Market) „B“
Time or engineering effort
Productperformance
DISRUPTS OR
REDEFINES
PERFORMANCE
TRAJECTORIES
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 10, 47
27. © NORMAN HIOB
Sustaining innovations
MARKETS: KNOWN
CUSTOMERS: UNDERSTOOD
MARKET
RESEARCH
GOOD
PLANNING
EXECUTION
ACCORDING
TO PLAN
+ +
© NORMAN HIOB
42. © NORMAN HIOB
THEY OFTEN FAIL, BECAUSE THEY
WAIT TOO LONG UNTIL THE
MARKET IS ESTABLISHED
© NORMAN HIOB
45. © NORMAN HIOB
20TIMES
THE
REVENUE
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 143-146Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 143-146
60. © NORMAN HIOB
VALUES
CRITERIA
BY WHICH
DECISIONS
ABOUT
PRIORITIES
ARE MADE
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“,
Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 185-196 © NORMAN HIOB
71. © NORMAN HIOB
1
2
3
4
5 TECHNOLOGY UNDERSUPPLY
RESOURCE DEPENDENCE
UNKNOWN MARKETS
GROWTH NEEDS
PROCESSES AND VALUES
76. © NORMAN HIOB
SET UP SEPARATE
ORGANISATION
SMALL ENOUGH
TO GET EXCITED
BY SMALL GAINS
77. © NORMAN HIOB
1
SPINS-OFF
CREATE AN
ORGANISATION WHOSE
SIZE MATCHES THE
OPPORTUNITY
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 154-155
78. © NORMAN HIOB
2
INCUBATE
ACQUIRE A SMALL
COMPANY WHOSE
STRUCTURE MATCHES
THE OPPORTUNITY
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 154-155
79. © NORMAN HIOB
DISCOVERY
DRIVEN LEARNING
TEST MARKET
ASSUMPTIONS
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 180-182
80. © NORMAN HIOB
PLANS FOR
EXECUTION
PLANS FOR
LEARNING
Clayton M. Christensen: “The Innovators Dilemma“, Harper Business, New York, 2011, p. 180-182
82. © NORMAN HIOB
1
2
3
4
5 PLAN FOR FAILURE
FIND NEW CUSTOMERS
CHECK PROCESSES AND VALUES
SET UP SEPARATE ORGANISATION
CREATE PLANS FOR LEARNING
84. © NORMAN HIOB
GET IN TOUCH!
Norman Hiob
Olivaer Platz 17
10707 Berlin
normanhiob@me.com