The Presentation is on study of a manufacturing company, and its expected endorsement in new channel with target among target customers. Its pros and cons in distribution through new channels.
2. B H A R A T H P O C H U
N . I . T J A M S H E D P U R
NATUREVIEW FRAME
3. OVER VIEW
1. NatureView frame in market
2. Goals
3. Hypothesis
4. Market Study
5. Option of profitability
6. Comparing the Options
7. Conclusion
4. 1.NATUREVIEW FRAME IN MARKET
⢠Natureview Farm, Inc., a small
yogurt manufacturer
⢠In 10 years, revenues had grown from
less than $100,000
to $13 million. (by 1999)
⢠First entered the market with 8-ounce (oz.) and 32-
oz. cup sizes of yogurt in two flavors
⢠With sales 86% 8-oz. yogurt cups and 14% 32-oz.
yogurt cups.
5. 1.1-FEATURES
⢠The recipe used natural
ingredients.
⢠The yogurt its unique smooth,
creamy texture unlike other
competitors
⢠Natureview Farmâs yogurtâs average shelf life was 50
days
⢠Most of the large competitorsâ products had a 30-day
shelf life
6. 1.2- PRODUCT LINE
⢠The Natureview brand grew quickly to
national distribution and
⢠Shared leadership in the natural
foods channel.
⢠The company had also started exploring multipack
yogurt products -childrenâs 4-oz. cups and yogurt
packaged in tubes.
⢠Natureview shipped its yogurt to retailers in cases.
7. 1.2- PRODUCT LINE
⢠Typical case containing 12 cups for the 8-oz
& 6 cups for the 32-oz. product lines,
respectively
⢠In both channels, the small cups
(6-oz. and 8-oz.) were displayed on the upper
two shelves.
⢠By 2000, Natureview Farm produced
ďtwelve refrigerated yogurt flavors in 8-oz. cups (86%
revenues)
ďfour flavors in 32-oz. cups (14% revenues).
Stores usually put multipacks on the next-lowest
shelves and 32-oz. containers in the bottom
8. 2-CHALLENGES
⢠Natureview did not consider entry into these channels
because, relative to the supermarket channel, these
channels offered limited revenue generation potential;
⢠The companyâs product was not a strong fit for the
narrow product offering afforded to consumers through
these channels; and volume requirements were
prohibitive in certain channels.
⢠With increase in demand Natureview want to expand
further with improved profits
9. 3-HYPOTHESIS
Sales
⢠Natureview, Whole Foods ($1.57 billion revenues in
1999) and Wild Oats ($721 million revenues).
⢠The organic foods market, worth $6.5 billion in 1999,
was predicted to grow to $13.3 billion in 2003.
⢠Target is to expand through new channels and get profit.
10. 3-PREVIEW
In 1999,
⢠Total U.S. retail sales of refrigerated yogurt reached $1.8
billion and sales volume was just over 2.3 billion units
⢠Supermarkets sold 97% of all yogurt consumed, and
natural food stores sold the balance
⢠In the previous five years, yogurt sales through
supermarkets had grown an average of 3% per year,
while sales through natural food stores had grown 20%
per year.
11. 3-PRICING
⢠The typical distributor margin in this
channel was 15%, and the typical
retailer margin was 27%.
⢠Advertisements cost $7,500 (used
by Natureview Farmâs competitors.)
⢠In the West, the same
advertisements cost $15,000 per
ad per retailer. (Nationally, they
cost $8,000 on average.)
12. 3-COST ON PRODUCT
Revenues $13,000,000 100%
Cost of Goods Sold $ 8,190,000 63%
Gross Profit $ 4,810,000 37%
Expenses
Administration/Freight $ 2,210,000 17%
Sales $ 1,560,000 12%
Marketing $ 390,000 3%
R&D $ 390,000 3%
Net Income $ 260,000 2%
13. 4-MARKET SURVEY
Organic food consumers bought
organic products of
46% - Supermarkets
25%- Small Health
29%- Natural Foods
Supermarkets sold 97% of all yogurt consumed, and
natural food stores sold the balance
14. 4-MARKET SURVEY
⢠Among 100% of the U.S Population taken
ď Organic products was consumed - 40% population
ď Non consumers - 60% of population
ďPrice was a barrier -40.2% of Population
ďless expensive will be afforded â 34.80% (58% 0f 60%)
ďAmong Organic Products 70% are yogurt Users
⢠Previously 28% of population consumed Yogurt
⢠Decreasing in price will Improve 24.36% Population
sales
So decrease in price would double the sales
15. 4-DOLLAR SHARE
⢠Yogurt Market Share by Packaging Segment, 1999 (Supermarket
channel, in % U.S. dollars)
⢠Dollar Share Dollar Sales
Change
8-oz. cups and smaller 74% +3%
Childrenâs multipacks 9% +12.5%
32-oz. cups 8% +2%
Other 9% NC
16. 4-CUSTOMER NATURE
⢠Shoppers at natural foods
stores tended to be more educated,
earn higher incomes, and be older
than the typical
supermarket shopper.
⢠Organic dairy products were bought by
74% of heavy organic food buyers and
29% of light organic food buyers.
17. OPTION 1
- most strongly advocated by Walter Bellini, vice
president of sales.
To expand six SKUs of the 8-oz. product line into one or
two selected supermarket channel regions
ďEight-ounce cups represented the largest dollar and unit
share of the refrigerated yogurt market
ďOther natural foods brands had successfully expanded their
distribution into the supermarket channel. Two such had
increased revenues by over 200% within two years of entering
supermarkets.
ďSupermarket retailers would likely authorize only one organic
yogurt brand. The first brand to enter the channel could
therefore have a significant first-mover advantage.
18. OPTION 2
⢠To expand four SKUs of the 32-oz. size
nationally
ďAlthough 32-oz. cups comprised a smaller unit and dollar
share of the yogurt market, they currently generated an
above-average gross profit margin for Natureview
(43.6% vs. 36.0% for the 8-oz. line).
ďNatureview Farm had a strong competitive advantage
because of the productâs longer shelf life. Natureviewâs
brand had achieved a 45% share of this size segment in
the natural foods channel.
19. OPTION 2
ďsell approximately 5.5 million incremental units in the
first year. To generate this projection,
Natureviewâs broker advised that the
company would need to expand into 64 supermarket
retail chains across the United States.
ďPromotional expenses would be lowerâthe 32-oz. size
was promoted only twice a year.
ďFor a 32-oz. expansion, marketing expenses would be
significantly lower as wellâonly 10% of what was
projected for the 8-oz. size in each region, representing
$120,000 per region per year.
20. OPTION 3
To introduce two SKUs of a childrenâs
multi-pack into the natural foods channel
ďexpansion into the supermarket channel could potentially
affect these relationships.
ďIt is was not convinced that necessary resources or skill-
set to sell effectively to and through supermarkets.
ďNatureview Farmâs all-natural ingredients would provide
the perfect positioning from which to launch its own
childrenâs multi-pack product offering into their core sales
channel.
21. OPTION 3
ďThe financial potential was very attractive,
The projected total yearly revenue for the 2-
multipack sales, and
ďRiley estimated potential incremental unit volume at 1.8
million.
ďGross profitability of the line would be 37.6%.
ďFurthermore, sales and marketing expenses in this
channel were lower; the cost of the complimentary cases
was estimated at 2.5% of the product lineâs manufacturer
sales
22. OPTION 3
ďThe marketing expenses were estimated at
$250,000.-- the strongest profit
contribution of all the strategies under
consideration.
ďThe natural foods channel was growing almost seven
times faster than the supermarket channel,
ďNatureview was developing several new products that
could further boost sales performance in this highly
successful channel.
ďThe five-year projected unit growth CAGR of yogurt in
the natural foods channel was projected to be 15%,
according to industry market research.
23. WHAT WILL BE BETTER OPTION
⢠All the option have different options
⢠But Option-1 seems to have better scope of
profitability to the Natureview frame
PROS
ď§ Supermarket has 97 of % of all yogurt consumed and
3% by natural food stores
ď§ Special service is taken at supermarket in sales
promotion and product delivery
24. SUPERMARKET VS NATURE FOODS
⢠Supermarket Channel
Dannon 33%
Yoplait 24%
Others 23%
Private Label 15%
Columbo 5%
Natural Foods Channel
Natureview Farm 24%
Brown Cow 15%
Horizon Organic 19%
White Wave 7%
Others 35%
Top competitors of Natureview were having good share in supermarket so
it may be success in getting into supermarket
⢠It is stated supermarket may make brand partner one who come first
25. TARGET CUSTOMERS
From the market survey
ďąPreviously years -28% of
population consumedYogurt
ďąDecreasing in price will Improve
24.36% Population sales
ďą24.36% people were willing to buy yogurt if the price is
being less,
ďThis simple means that decreasing in prices may double
the sales
It is observed that Supermarket has relative LOW PRICES
when compared to Nature food (Price table shown above)
26. NATURE FOOD / SUPERMARKET
⢠Natural Foods Channel Average Retail Price 8-
ounce (oz.) cup $ 0.88 32-oz.
cup $ 3.19 4- oz.
cup multipack $ 3.35
⢠Supermarket Channel Average Retail Price
⢠8-oz. cup $ 0.74
32-oz. cup $ 2.70
4-oz. cup multipack $ 2.85
⢠Manufacturing cost the 8-oz. cup, the 32-oz. cup, and
the childrenâs multipackâwere $0.31, $0.99, and $1.15
respectively.
⢠So entering to supermarket may improve target addience
27. This is Incremental sales, in Option-1 it is 35 million, and
8-oz has 74% dollar share, 32-oz has 8% share
⢠This means Action-1 could give 77.7 million revenue
⢠Action-2 could give 2.01 million and other could bring 0.8
million
This may include soling charges and advertising expanses
28. OTHER EXPENDITURES
ďlarger competitors such as Dannon and Yoplait, both of
which spent over $60 million per year in marketing their
yogurt products,
ďThis include slotting charges of $10,00 per SKU, on
other hand this is initially supplied to 2 or 3 store
ďNatureviewâs advertising agency estimated that a
comprehensive advertising plan would cost Natureview
$1.2 million per region per year.
29. OTHER EXPENSES
ďSG&A would increase by $320,000annually;
ď $200,000 would be incremental SG&A for additions to
sales staff required to manage the supermarket brokers
in the two regions, and $120,000 would go towards
additional marketing staff.
⢠Apart from all expanses the profit margin of 1.5% over
71.3million (77.7â(3.2+2+1.2))will be a large number
after all margins included
30. OPTION 1-VS-2/3
⢠As seen above this could bring better sales unit and
⢠Margin is better when compared 32-oz (74% Dollar
share-8-oz and 9% for 32-oz )
(Option-2 is not preferred)
⢠Entry to supermarket will enlarge its target customers
⢠Low cost with respective to Natural food will improve
customer segment (Option 3 is
not preferred)
⢠So ACTION 1 could improve sales and profit margin with
its Promotions and Advertising in market
31. CONCLUSION
⢠Option 1 could bring good sales for NATUREVIEW
FRAME
⢠Natureview Frame has low cast of making still have high
price in Natural food store
⢠It has spent less on advertising compared to its
competitors, though it has large target customers
⢠Entry as Option-1 could improve its brand value and
could make it improve marketing
â˘