2. www.le.ac.uk
Developing distance learning
programmes at Leicester
An overview and an example from the
Institute of Learning Innovation
Dr Palitha Edirisingha
Institute of Learning Innovation
University of Leicester, UK
Learning Innovation Workshop - Delegates from the Open University of China (OUC) – 3 – 7 June 2013
3. From an ‘idea’ to delivering
Proposal
Management
Delivery
Students and
teachers
4. Developing a new programme – 7 step process
Initial
concept
Early
decisions
Outline
Business
Plan /
Academic
Rationale
Approval
Process
(FSPDC)
Further
Market
Testing
Advertising
and
Applications
Final
Approval
(PDC)
6. Programme characteristics
Full-time
(from Oct 2014)
Distance, Part-time
(from Oct 2013)
Campus-based Distance
Full-time Part-time
One year Two years
Two modules (courses) per Term One module per Term
35 – 40 learning hours a week 14+ learning hours a week
180 credits 180 credits
1,350 learning hours 1,350 learning hours
7.
8. Module 1: Technology
Enhanced Learning
(30 credits)
Module 2: Learning
Design for the 21st
Century
(30 credits)
Module 3: Research
Design and Methods
(30 credits)
Module 4: Case Studies
of Learning Innovation
(30 credits)
Module 5: Dissertation
Research Project
(60 credits)
Oct – Dec 2014 Jan – Apr 2015 May – Sept 2015
CERTIFICATE in Learning Innovation
(Modules 1 and 2 = 60 credits)
DIPLOMA in Learning Innovation (Modules 1, 2, 3, and 4 = 120 credits)
MSc in Learning Innovation (all 5 modules)
MSc in Learning Innovation – structure of the full-time programme
10. Considerations in design a module for
distance learning
225 learning hours
14 weeks
14 hours per week
30 credits, and
allowing for:
- catch-up time
- synchronous activities
11. Considerations in developing module
specifications
Matching:
- Learning outcomes
- Assessments
- Activities, and
- Content / topics to be learned
12. Module: Research Design and Methods
Learning
outcomes
Teaching/learning
methods
Student workload
Assessment
13. Module: Research Design and Methods
Learning
outcomes
Teaching/learning
methods
Student workload
Assessment
(= 6,000 words)
(= 225 hours)
14. Learning outcomes
By the end of this module, successful participants will be able
to:
1. develop researchable research questions
2. critically appraise the strengths and weaknesses of a range
of research designs, methodologies and methods applicable to
learning innovations research
3. evaluate the use of key data gathering and analysis methods
4. develop a suitable research proposal in the field of learning
innovation to be carried out as part of their dissertation
research project module.
15. Assessment components
1. A 'digital poster' (or equivalent artefact) with a 'narrative'
illustrating choices made on research design, methodology
and methods for a chosen research project in the field of
learning innovation.
2. A research proposal on the study of a chosen topic of a
learning innovation initiative
16. Teaching/learning methods
Designed according to the 7C approach to learning design
Well-designed learning activities using both synchronous and
asynchronous, to be carried out online (e.g.., discussion boards and
wikis on Blackboard, blogs) that are moderated by tutors and peers
Recorded teaching material by the course team (videos, podcasts,
narrated slides and lecture notes)
Podcasts produced by international experts
Open Educational Resources (OERs) videos on YouTube, lectures on
iTunesU
Social networking tools (e.g., Cloudworks) for learners to share and
discuss their learning artefacts
Tutorials with the personal tutor for the duration of the module
Duration can be as long as one year.Proposal stage involves 4 – 5 stages / steps and can take up to 6 months.This is the stage at which decisions are made about:Whether there is a market for the course / the business caseIts nameFeesWho is going to be involved in developing and delivering the course (also recruiting new staff)Course outline, assessments, learning outcomes, how students’ progression is going to be managed/supportedInnovations that are going to be built into the course [the character of the institution and its members of staff]Opportunity to put research into teaching [in terms of content and approach to teaching]What we are talking today is the delivery stage. But it is important to consider the Proposal stage too, especially in the context of distance learning.
What is constructive alignment?'Constructive alignment' has two aspects. The 'constructive' aspect refers to the idea that students construct meaningthrough relevant learning activities. That is, meaning is not something imparted or transmitted from teacher to learner,but is something learners have to create for themselves. Teaching is simply a catalyst for learning:'If students are to learn desired outcomes in a reasonably effective manner, then the teacher's fundamental task is to get studentsto engage in learning activities that are likely to result in their achieving those outcomes... It is helpful to remember that what thestudent does is actually more important in determining what is learned than what the teacher does.' (Shuell, 1986: 429)The 'alignment' aspect refers to what the teacher does, which is to set up a learning environment that supports thelearning activities appropriate to achieving the desired learning outcomes. The key is that the components in the teachingsystem, especially the teaching methods used and the assessment tasks, are aligned with the learning activities assumed inthe intended outcomes. The learner is in a sense 'trapped', and finds it difficult to escape without learning what he or sheis intended to learn.There are thus four major steps:1. Defining the intended learning outcomes (ILOs);2. Choosing teaching/learning activities likely to lead to the ILOs;3. Assessing students' actual learning outcomes to see how well they match what was intended;4. Arriving at a final grade.[http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/resources/database/id477_aligning_teaching_for_constructing_learning.pdf]