Theoretical Framework
What is the central concept(s) integral to
the study? (look within and outside LIS)
Connecting the study to theory: basic
research
Good Theory
Advances knowledge in a discipline,
guides, research, enlightens the discipline,
helps the discipline mature and gain
validation
Enables us to rise above the seemingly
random confusion of everyday life to see
patterns and to understand principles on
which to base purposeful, productive
action
Provides an important context
Theory vs. Practice
We cannot do without theory. It will always
defeat practice in the end for a quite
simple reason. Practice is static. It does
well what it knows. It has, however, no
principle for dealing with what it doesn’t
know … Practice is not well adapted for
rapid adjustments to a changing
environment. Theory is light footed, it can
adapt itself to changed circumstances,
think out fresh
Out fresh combinations and possibilities,
peer into the future. Theory provides a
clear framework, administrative practice
reduces to a series of meaningless acts,
without purpose of direction.
Source: Charles H. Granger, Harvard Business Review 42 (May-June
1964), p. 64.
Theory
Provides patterns for the interpretation of
data
Links one study to another
Supplies frameworks within which
concepts and variables acquire special
significance
Allows us to interpret the larger meaning
of our findings for ourselves and others
Source: The elements of social scientific thinking, p. 40
Examples
Information needs
information-seeking
behavior
Effectiveness
Teams/small groups
Success
Reference Transactions
Standards
RUSA, IL, Accreditation
Expectations
service quality
Satisfaction
Value
See Measuring your
library’s value, Donald
S. Elliott et al (ALA,
2007)
Theoretical Framework
Dalbello, M. (2009). Cultural dimensions of digital library
development: Part II the cultural innovations of five
European national libraries. Library Quarterly, 79(1).
Culture = National Culture + Organizational
Culture + Professional Culture + Heterogeneous
Tool Kit Culture
Logical Structure
Explicitly addresses all the possible
variables within a study
Identifies all of the important components
Is a menu of choices--no decisions are
represented
The decisions = objectives
Logical Structure
Not always directly addressed within the
published study, but must be addressed
by the research during the planning
stages.
Often possible to represent the logical
structure through a diagram or model
What
Identifies the problem under study
May help to brainstorm for contributing factors,
causes and effects
May have to operationalize terms= i.e. success,
efficiency, effectiveness, etc.
Some methods:
Flow Chart
Five Why’s
Fishbone Diagram
Basic: to conceptualize
Applied: to test
Action: to describe
Objectives
To “describe” To “relate:” “compare”
or “contrast” (relating
applies to basic,
applied, and action
research)
identify
define
distinguish
determine
Depict
etc.
Objectives
To identify the attributes (requirements, responsibilities,
qualifications, and salaries/benefits) of music librarians
To determine the extent to which their responsibilities
relate solely to music librarianship
To compare the attributes listed most frequently in job
advertisements with those attributes leading to the actual
hiring of individual
To compare the list of attributes identified in job
advertisements by: geographical area, highest degree
offered by the institution, institutional control (private vs.
public)
Evaluation Questions
How much?
How many?
How economical?
How prompt?
How accurate?
How responsive?
How well?
How valuable?
How reliable?
How courteous?
How satisfied?
---------------------------
Accountability and
Effectiveness = How
well?