The worst of the global financial crisis appears to be over, but unknown to many organizations, another time bomb awaits. Employee goodwill has been worn down through working longer and harder during the past year, putting up with pay cuts and freezes and with little in return.
And while many employees have taken the extra demands in their stride, most of them consider their efforts unsustainable, given the strain it puts on their families, relationships, health and wellbeing.
More importantly, the lack of staff engagement and proper communication during the crisis has led employees to feel that an unwritten ‘contract’ has been breached, thus eroding their loyalty, commitment and ultimately, companies’ ability to truly recover from the recession.
Sadly, the treachery will not end there. As economies revive, organizations are likely to face a talent exodus, as disengaged, over-stretched and under-rewarded employees look out for greener pastures.
3. 3
“
While CEOs make promises about what their organization can
deliver to customers, shareholders and other stakeholders, it
is the employees who keep these promises on their behalf. Do
we really want to put detached or ineffective employees in
”
front of our clients and investors?
Or look at it another way. While CEOs Walking around the offices today,
make promises about what their managers may feel the warm glow of team
organization can deliver to customers, spirit among their subordinates, having
shareholders and other stakeholders, it is battled through the downturn successfully.
the employees who keep these promises
on their behalf. Do we really want to put But managers should be aware of superficial
detached or ineffective employees in front engagement – where the levels of
of our clients and investors? discretionary effort and retention are
artificially inflated by redundancy fears
and a soft employment market, rather than
Lost in expansion genuine loyalty to the company.
How did this state of affairs happen? In Hence companies who have solely focused
the rapid growth of the last twenty years, on the bottom line during the recession
managers in Asia have been focusing so could easily fail to notice the “sweat debt”
much on managing external issues such they have built up with employees for their
as capitalizing on market opportunities, extra effort during rough times. They risk
expanding into new businesses, and falling behind their competitors that have
securing financial capital, that they have bucked the trend and kept true
overlooked the importance of building engagement high.
internal organizational strengths for future
sustainability and continued success.
The assumption is that we can always buy Can reward make a difference?
talent, so why bother to build? Of course, While one of the easiest ways to improve
straight away, we see that this is akin to employee motivation is by increasing their
growing a bigger body without building pay, is it necessarily the most effective?
the corresponding muscle strength.
What we have seen repeatedly is how this
The financial crisis of 2008-09 has not stop-gap measure creates a vicious cycle
helped matters as companies went into that encourages employees to be loyal
survival mode, asking employees to do to money, rather than the company, and
more with less resources and reward. Many abandoning their positions for better
employees understood the importance of paying jobs, driving salary benchmarks
pulling together and willingly put in upwards without any real benefit.
additional time (often without pay) at the
expense of health, relationships and family
life.
www.haygroup.com
5. 5
Perhaps part of the solution lies in re- 20.5% in Vietnam – meaning that one in
designing the manager’s job and parcelling five employees who started the year with
it out among several assistant mangers, in your Vietnamese operations will not be
thus taking advantage of the fact, for the there by the end of the year!
cost one middle manager, you can hire
three junior managers in China (as shown While good salaries can help
in Figure 2). organizations attract the best talent, it
is not the largest factor in determining
whether these talents would stay. From our
observation of leading multinationals, it is
Money can’t buy love
clear that there are distinctions between the
It is not unusual for the leading multi- tools used in recruitment and attraction,
nationals in Asia to dedicate a sizable and those that are used in engagement and
proportion of the total remuneration retention (Figure 4). A common oversight
package to non-monetary rewards and is the failure to distinguish between the
benefits. two.
According to Hay Group’s PayNet, in
China for example, compensation in the
form of statutory benefits, allowances for Case study: When it pays to “save face”
cars and other privileges, as well as short- In Asian culture, the notion of “saving face”
term incentives like performance bonuses, adds an interesting dimension to the
make up close to 30 per cent of the delicate equation that balances between
remuneration mix for junior to senior “stay” and “go”. In China, a top-paying MNC
post remained open for 12 months simply
management employees. In Vietnam,
because it did not offer a company car
employees enjoy similar benefits that range among its perks. Although salary
between 29 per cent and 42 per cent of the adjustments made by the HQ more than
total remuneration package. compensated for the drawback, it did
nothing to entice candidates to leave their
And yet, despite all the attention that existing jobs, which came with a car. As one
HR pays to designing and administering of the candidates puts it, “No one knows
bonuses and benefits, are we reaping the how much I earn; but everyone will see if I
corresponding returns in staff loyalty? In am not entitled to a company car!”
2009, staff attrition reached as high as
Figure 3:
How soon do they leave? 14
Junior Mgmt Middle Mgmt Senior Mgmt
13 How soon they leave? (median) 13
12
11
11
10 10
10
Average length of service (Years)
9
8 8
8
7 7
7
6 6
6
5 5 5 5
5
4 4
4
3 3 3 3
3
2
2
1
0
China Indonesia Korea Malaysia Singapore Thailand Vietnam
Source: Hay Group PayNet, 2009
www.haygroup.com
7. 7
Hence, sound and decisive leadership is and not hinder, productivity. This could
critical for improving employee involve shifts in organizational procedures
engagement levels. The message to Asian and having the right tools to measure and
companies hoping to ride the waves of manage performance.
economic recovery is this: hire the right
senior managers and appoint the right In a supportive environment, employees
leaders. Quality leaders are the key to would have authority and empowerment
better engagement and more effective to act within their areas of responsibility,
organizational performance. and full access to resources required (for
example, information, technology, tools
and equipment and budgets) to get the job
done. They are also able to focus on their
Setting employees up for success
mission-critical work without having to
However, engagement alone is not enough. negotiate obstacles in the form of non-
To get the most from employees, leaders essential tasks or red tape.
have a responsibility to ensure that
organizational systems and work In other words, to get the most out of
environments support individual and employees, companies would need to not
organizational effectiveness. only motivate but also enable them to
channel their extra efforts more
Enablement requires that employees must productively. Engaged employees need the
first be matched to their jobs, so that their confidence that their organization is not
skills and abilities may be put to good use. setting them up to fail but rather, it is
Secondly, enablement involves creating enabling their success.
supportive environments that facilitate,
Figure 5: Engagement drivers Asia West
The East-West divide:
Clear and promising direction 76% 77%
Engagement and
enablement drivers Quality & customer focus 72% 77%
Employee Engagement
Confidence in leaders 61% 67% Asia = 68%
(West = 74%)
Respect and recognition 60% 65%
Development opportunities 55% 60%
Pay and benefits 40% 53%
Employee
Effectiveness
Enablement drivers Asia West
Collaboration 76% 77%
Performance management 73% 77% Employee Enablement
Asia = 66%
Authority and empowerment 72% 76%
(West = 71%)
Resources 61% 63%
Work, structure & process 54% 55%
Training 40% 54% Source: Hay Group Insight, 2009
www.haygroup.com