SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 20
2009 Year-in-Review Benchmarks
A DoubleClick Report




                       Table of Contents
                       Executive Summary ......................................................2
                       Static Image and Flash Benchmarks ......................3
                       Rich Media Ad Benchmarks .......................................5
                       Benchmarks Comparison 2008 vs. 2009 ............14
                       Worldwide Overall Performance Norms .................16
White Paper | DoubleCilck




                                                      2009 Year-in-Review Benchmarks
                                                      The DoubleClick Benchmarks Report is a free report of industry benchmarks that
About DoubleClick                                     helps advertisers, agencies, and publishers evaluate the performance of online
Google’s DoubleClick products provide ad
                     ™

management and ad serving solutions to                display advertising campaigns in the U.S., relative to industry norms.
companies that buy, create or sell online
                                                      DoubleClick benchmarks are derived from a robust data set of metrics across
advertising. The world’s top marketers, publishers,
ad networks and agencies use DoubleClick              DoubleClick for Advertisers (DFA), based on rigorous methodology with input
products as the foundation for their online           from the Advertising Research Foundation. This data set includes hundreds of
advertising businesses. With deep expertise in        advertisers, thousands of campaigns, and tens of billions of ad impressions.
ad serving, media planning, search management,
rich media, video and mobile, our DoubleClick         Data shown here represent activity of a wide range of ad formats for DFA
products help customers execute their digital         advertisers in the United States unless otherwise indicated. For all benchmarks
media strategy more effectively.                      provided in this report, the data are from January 2009 to December 2009.
For more information visit:
                                                      Executive Summary
www.doubleclick.com
                                                      Overall U.S. campaign performance norms for 2009 across DoubleClick image,
                                                      Flash, and rich media campaigns are as follows:

                                                       Click-through Rate (CTR)      0.10%          Video Complete Rate           50%
                                                       Interaction Rate              2.54%          Average Display Time          34.6 secs
                                                       Average Interaction Time      9.0 secs       Average Expanding Time        4.7 secs
                                                       Expansion Rate                2.8%


                                                      Key Observations:
                                                      Ad size correlates with clicks and interaction rates. As in previous years, we have
                                                      observed that ad size is somewhat correlated with click-through rate. This is also
                                                      true with interaction rates except for one anomaly – the ad size that has the highest
                                                      interaction rate overall is the square pop-under (250x250), although it’s important
                                                      to note this size is one of the least common creative sizes served through DFA.
                                                      Static ads and flash ad click-through rates remained relatively stable from 2008
                                                      to 2009. In 2009, static ads perform slightly better than flash ads in terms of click-
                                                      throughs when you compare them by creative size. However when you compare
                                                      them by industry vertical there was virtually no difference in click-through rates
                                                      between static and flash ads. This suggests that differences in click-through rates
                                                      between flash and static ads are due more to ad vertical rather than format.
                                                      We also observed that expansion rates declined from 2008 to 2009 while overall
                                                      interaction rates increased in 2009.

                                                      DFA Impressions by Creative Type
                                                      Data on the distribution of impressions by type of creative format was a popular
                                                      request in response to last year’s benchmarks report so we included this
                                                      information in the report this year. Note that as with other benchmarks in this
                                                      report, this data reflects impressions served through the DoubleClick for
                                                      Advertisers platform.




                                                                             2
2009 DFA Impressions


                                                                                    Image 20%



                                                                                    Rich Media In-page 5%


                                                                                    Rich Media Expanding 2%
                                                                                    Rich Media Video 2%
                                                                                    Rich Media In-page Video 2%


                                                                                    Flash 69%

Source: DoubleClick Benchmarks, U.S. DFA campaigns, January – December 2009



Static Image Ads and Flash Ads Benchmarks

Overall Click-Through Rate (CTR)

 Static Ads                           0.10%
 Flash Ads                            0.09%



Figure 1: Click-through Rate by Creative Sizes for Static Image and Flash Ads


      Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                               0.09%
                                                              0.10%
    Vertical Rectangle: 240x400                                                  0.19%
                                                                                                   0.28%
         Verical Banner: 120x240                   0.05%
                                                    0.06%
       Square Pop-Up: 250x250                                               0.16%
                                                                                          0.23%
              Skyscraper: 120x600                         0.07%
                                                                0.10%
               Rectangle: 180x150                             0.09%
                                                                  0.11%
   Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                    0.10%
                                                                    0.12%
              Leaderboard: 728x90                           0.08%
                                                              0.09%
      Large Rectangle: 336x280                                0.09%
                                                                        0.14%
          Half Page Ad: 300x600                                                0.18%
                                                                             0.17%
              Half Banner: 234x60                    0.06%
                                                     0.06%
               Full Banner: 468x60                 0.05%
                                                        0.08%
          3:1 Rectangle: 300x100                   0.05%
                                                     0.06%

                                       0       0.05         0.10     0.15       0.20      0.25    0.30

                                             Flash click-through rate%                 Static click-through rate%

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, a cross section of major ad sizes only,
January – December 2009

                                                      3
Figure 2: Click-Through Rate for Static Image and Flash Ads by Industry Vertical

                               Auto                                                              0.15%
                                                                                              0.14%
                            Brands                                             0.10%
                                                                                  0.12%
                                B2B                                  0.08%
                                                                        0.09%
             Classified and Local                                 0.07%
                                                                           0.10%
                                CPG                                     0.09%
                                                                           0.10%
               Financial Services                              0.06%
                                                                  0.07%
            Media/Entertainment                                            0.10%
                                                                              0.11%
                              Retail                                 0.08%
                                                                              0.11%
                               Tech                                    0.09%
                                                                                  0.12%
                           Telecom                             0.06%
                                                                  0.07%
                              Travel                                 0.08%
                                                                        0.09%
                          Wellness                                   0.08%
                                                                              0.11%

                                       0    0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08             0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16

                                             Flash click-through rate%              Static click-through rate%

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, a cross section of major industry verticals only,
January – December 2009




                                                     4
Rich Media Ad Benchmarks
•    Preface: A Primer on Evaluating Rich Media Ad Metrics
•    Overall Rich Media Performance Norms
•    Click-through Rate
•    Interaction Rate and Expansion Rate
•    Average Display Time, Interaction Time, and Expanding Time
•    Video Complete Rate



Preface: A Primer on Evaluating Rich Media Ad Metrics
A rich media ad unit can inspire a range of responses from users — not every click in a rich media unit
produces a click-through. When a viewer clicks on a rich media unit, a number of outcomes are possible,
including expanding the unit, playing a video or otherwise interacting with the unit. The call-to-action
for a viewer to click-through competes with all other possible forms of interaction within the unit. As a
result, click-through rates can be lower for rich media than for other forms of online advertising where the
clickthrough is the only form of user interaction.
The objective of rich media ads isn’t always to drive clicks — they are often used to provide users with
an experience within the ad itself. Therefore, engagement metrics such as interaction rates, interactions
times, video completion, and expansions are important measures of the success of such ads. Also
keep in mind that conversion activity can happen within the ad unit itself: A click could result in the user
downloading a report from the ad unit, signing up for more information through a form on the ad unit,
locating a product by zip code, or playing a video within the ad unit. Advertisers should consider the goals
of the campaign at hand, and evaluate the performance of their campaigns based on the most relevant
rich media ad metric.

Overall Rich Media Performance Norms

    Click-through Rate (CTR)          0.10%             Video Complete Rate                  50%
    Interaction Rate                  2.5%              Average Display Time                 34.6 secs
    Average Interaction Time          8.9 secs          Average Expanding Time               4.7 secs
    Expansion Rate                    2.8%


Key Observations
Differences between non-video and video for rich media in-page ads in terms of interaction rate were not
considerably different (see figure 7), except for the large rectangle where video outperformed non-video
by a large margin (4.0% vs. 2.7% respectively).
In-page video click-through rate was down for half-page ad size, from 0.3% in 2008 down to 0.1% in
2009. The other ads sizes remained relatively the same from year to year.
In contrast to the 2008 benchmarks where we saw video outperform non-video ads across the board,
we observed that in 2009 non-video rich media expanding ads performed better than video ads both in
terms of interaction and expansion rates. (Figures 14 and 15).
Video completes for rich media in-page went down a little over 6% from 2008 to 2009 from 62.3% in in
2008 to 56.3% in 2009 (see page 13).
Compared to 2008 benchmarks we found that in 2009 more people interacted with and expanded rich
media ads but the time they spent interacting, expanding or finishing a video ad has declined from 2008.

Increases in overall rich media metrics – 2008 to 2009
• Rich media average display time increased from 32.1 secs to 34.6 secs
• Rich media click-through rate went up from 0.09% to 0.11%
• Rich media interaction rate rose from 2.1% to 2.5%
• Rich media expansion rate rose from 2.5% to 2.8%


                                             5
Declines in overall rich media metrics – 2008 to 2009
• Average interaction time from 10.3 secs to 9.0 secs
• Video complete rate from 54.5% to 50.0%
• Average expanding time from 6.5 secs to 4.7 secs

Click-through Rate by DoubleClick Rich Media Format
Video exhibits higher click-through rates than non-video for both in-page as well as expanding rich
media formats.


Figure 3: Click-through Rate by DoubleClick Rich Media Format

   0.14
   0.12                                                                     0.1 1%                     0.11%
                   0.10%                       0.10%
   0.10
   0.08
   0.06
   0.04
   0.02
   0.00
            DoubleClick Rich Media       DoubleClick Rich Media       DoubleClick Rich Media    DoubleClick Rich Media
            Expanding (Non-video)          Expanding (Video)           In-page (Non-video)         In-page (Video)


Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page and expanding formats only,
January – December 2009




Click-through Rate (CTR) by Creative Size for in-page and Expanding DoubleClick Rich Media Formats

Figure 4: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Click-through Rate for video and non-video


                                                        0.10%
     Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                              0.12%

            Skyscraper: 120x600                              0.13%
                                                          0.11%
             Rectangle: 180x150                                                                 0.36%

  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                0.12%
                                                              0.14%
           Leaderboard: 728x90                  0.06%
                                                   0.08%
     Large Rectangle: 336x280                              0.12%
                                                       0.09%
          Half Page Ad: 300x600                           0.11%
                                                                        0.20%
            Full Banner: 468x60               0.05%

                                     0     0.05    0.10     0.15     0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

                                           Video click-through rate%              Non-video click-through rate%



Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




                                                   6
Figure 5: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Click-through Rate for video and non-video


    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                   0.11%
                                                           0.09%
           Skyscraper: 120x600                               0.10%
                                                        0.07%
  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                         0.12%
                                                                    0.12%
          Leaderboard: 728x90                            0.08%
                                                         0.08%
     Large Rectangle: 336x280                                            0.15%
                                                                     0.13%
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                                                    0.18%
                                                                                          0.22%

                                    0          0.05        0.10        0.15        0.20        0.25

                                          Video click-through rate%              Non-video%

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




Interaction and Expansion Rates
Non-video rich media expanding ads have both a higher expansion rate and a higher interaction rate
compared to video ads and in-page non-video ads.


Figure 6: Interaction Rate and Expansion Rate by DoubleClick Rich Media Format

      5.00

      4.50

      4.00
                                            3.99%

      3.50
                                                        3.08%                                      3.09%
      3.00
                                                                              2.56%
      2.50            2.21%                                                                                   2.27%
      2.00

       1.50

      1.00

      0.50

      0.00
               DoubleClick Rich Media      DoubleClick Rich Media     DoubleClick Rich Media      DoubleClick Rich Media
                In-page (Non-video)        Expanding (Non-video)         In-page (Video)            Expanding (Video)

                                                 Interaction Rate %            Expansion Rate %


Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in page and expanding formats only,
January – December 2009




                                                    7
Interaction Rate by Creative Size

Figure 7: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Interaction Rate for video and non-video

    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                                2.4%
                                                                          2.3%
                                                                     1.9%
           Skyscraper: 120x600                                    1.7%

             Rectangle: 180x150                         1.2%

  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                                       2.8%
                                                                               2.5%
          Leaderboard: 728x90                                       1.7%
                                                                     1.8%
     Large Rectangle: 336x280                                                                    4.0%
                                                                                    2.7%
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                                                                        4.1%
                                                                                                         4.5%
            Full Banner: 468x60                 0.7%

                                     0    0.5     1         1.5     2       2.5     3    3.5     4     4.5        5

                                          Video interaction rate %                         Non-video interaction rate %

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009


Interaction Rate and Expansion Rate by Creative Size

Figure 8: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Interaction Rate for video and non-video

    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                       2.9%
                                                                   2.9%
           Skyscraper: 120x600                  1.3%
                                                                   2.9%
  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                           3.4%
                                                                                  4.5%
          Leaderboard: 728x90                                     2.7%
                                                                          3.9%
    Large Rectangle: 336x280                                               4.0%
                                                                                      5.2%
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                                                     4.6%
                                                                                                     6.9%

                                    0                 2.0                4.0               6.0              8.0

                                          Video interaction rate %                         Non-video interaction rate %

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




                                                      8
Figure 9: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Expansion Rate for video and non-video

    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                     1.8%
                                                                        2.4%
           Skyscraper: 120x600                                          2.3%

  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                            2.1%
                                                                                 3.0%
          Leaderboard: 728x90                                                  2.8%
                                                                                     3.5%
     Large Rectangle: 336x280                                                   2.9%
                                                                                                   4.3%
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                             1.3%

                                      0         1.0              2.0           3.0           4.0      5.0

                                          Video Expansion Rate %                       Non-video Expansion Rate %

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009



Figure 10: Click-through Rate by Industry Vertical for DoubleClick Rich Media Format

                              Auto                                                                   0.15%
                              B2B                                         0.08%
                              CPG                                             0.09%
              Financial Services                                  0.06%
           Media/Entertainment                                                       0.10%
                             Retail                                            0.09%
                              Tech                                                   0.10%
                          Telecom                                      0.07%
                             Travel                                       0.08%
                         Wellness                                              0.09%

                                      0   0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10                      0.12 0.14 0.16

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media formats only, a cross section of major industry
verticals only, January – December 2009




                                                      9
Figure 11: Interaction Rate, and Expansion Rate by Industry Vertical for DoubleClick Rich Media Format

                             Auto                 2.0%
                                                   2.2%
                              B2B                                                               8.4%
                                                                             6.3%
                              CPG                               3.5%
                                                             3.1%
              Financial Services                                3.5%
                                                            2.9%
          Media/Entertainment                    1.7%
                                                         2.7%
                            Retail                     2.4%
                                                           3.0%
                             Tech                            3.5%
                                                        2.5%
                         Telecom                          2.9%
                                                       2.4%
                            Travel                     2.4%
                                                        2.5%
                         Wellness                            3.4%
                                                               3.8%

                                     0           2.0            4.0        6.0           8.0           10.0

                                            Expansion Rate %               Interaction Rate%

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media formats only, a cross section of major industry
verticals only, January – December 2009




Figure 12: Average Display Time (secs), Interaction Time (secs), and Expanding Time (secs)
by DoubleClick Rich Media Format


               45.00

               40.00                                                                    38.37
                                    35.24
               35.00
                                                            32.62                                              30.92
               30.00

               25.00

               20.00

                15.00
                            10.12                                                10.8
                10.00                                                                                                  8.05
                                                                                                        6.16
                 5.00                            4.24               3.56
                 0.00
                        DoubleClick Rich Media   DoubleClick Rich Media    DoubleClick Rich Media      DoubleClick Rich Media
                         In-page (Non-video)     Expanding (Non-video)        In-page (Video)            Expanding (Video)

                                Average Interaction Time
                                Average Display Time
                                Average Expanding Time

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




                                                       10
Average Display Time, Interaction Time, and Expanding Time by Creative Size and Rich Media Format

Figure 13: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Average Display Time (secs) for video and non-video

                                                                            36.6
    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                              33.8
                                                                            35.4
          Skyscraper: 120x600                                                36.6

            Rectangle: 180x150                                       29.0

  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                                    37.9
                                                                            34.9
          Leaderboard: 728x90                                                   40.3
                                                                            36.2
    Large Rectangle: 336x280                                                                         53.2
                                                                                                      54.8
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                                                       41.3
                                                                                  38.4
           Full Banner: 468x60                                              35.3

                                      0        10            20    30         40                50      60     (secs)

                                           Video Average Display Time
                                           Non-video Average Display Time

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




Figure 14: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Average Interaction Time (secs) for Video and non-video

  Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                                           11.1
                                                                              9.7
                                                                                   10.5
        Skyscraper: 120x600                                                        10.5
          Rectangle: 180x150                                 5.2

Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                                          10.5
                                                                                  10.3
        Leaderboard: 728x90                                                                11.8
                                                                                  10.2
                                                                                           11.9
  Large Rectangle: 336x280                                                                  13.1

      Half Page Ad: 300x600                                                                          14.2
                                                                                         11.4
         Full Banner: 468x60                                                       10.5

                                  0                      5                   10                       15     (secs)

                                          Video Average Interaction Time
                                          Non-video Average Interaction Time

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




                                                    11
Figure 15: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable non-video
Average Display Time (secs), Expanding Time (secs), and Interaction Time (secs)

                                           5.3
    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600              4.6
                                                                       29.6
                                           5.3
           Skyscraper: 120x600              6.6
                                                                         30.5
                                          4.7
  Medium Rectangle: 300x250               4.0
                                                                            32.4
                                        3.2
          Leaderboard: 728x90           2.6%
                                                                              34.0
                                          4.3
    Large Rectangle: 336x280               5.4
                                                                                          45.3
                                                7.6
        Half Page Ad: 300x600            3.2
                                                                                                 53.2

                                    0            10               20   30            40     50          60   (secs)

                                          Average Interaction Time
                                          Average Expanding Time
                                          Average Display Time

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




Figure 16: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Video
Average Display Time (secs), Expanding Time (secs), and Interaction Time (secs)

                                               6.1
     Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                        9.5
                                                                       27.6

           Skyscraper: 120x600                  6.5
                                                                        28.9
                                                6.8
  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                      7.8
                                                                            30.8
                                           5.0
          Leaderboard: 728x90                        7.8
                                                                              32.4
                                               5.7
     Large Rectangle: 336x280                         9.3
                                                                                                 51.1
                                                     8.5
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                              11.9
                                                                        29.4

                                    0            10               20   30            40     50          60   (secs)

                                          Average Interaction Time
                                          Average Expanding Time
                                          Average Display Time

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad
sizes only, January – December 2009




                                                           12
Video Complete Rate

 DoubleClick Rich Media Expanding              38.5                  DoubleClick Rich Media in-page                  56.3%



Figure 17: Video Complete Rate for DoubleClick Rich Media in-page (Video) and Expandable (Video)
by Creative Size

    Wide Skyscraper: 160x600                                         40.0%
                                                                                     60.8%
           Skyscraper: 120x600                                   34.4%
                                                                                         66.8%
  Medium Rectangle: 300x250                                           40.2%
                                                                                54.7%
           Leaderboard: 728x90                                   35.1%
                                                                                    59.7%
     Large Rectangle: 336x280                                      37.5%
                                                                                       61.8%
        Half Page Ad: 300x600                                         42.3%
                                                                     39.8%

                                      0             20            40              60             80

                                           Expandable Video Complete Rate %
                                           In-page Video Complete Rate %

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page and expanding formats only, a cross section
of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009




Figure 18: Video Complete Rate by Industry Vertical

                              Auto                                                                     61.5%
                               B2B                                         34.1%
                              CPG                                                        48.8%
               Financial Services                                                      46.2%
           Media/Entertainment                                              35.9%
                             Retail                         21.2%
                              Tech                                                                56.0%
                          Telecom                                                      46.7%
                             Travel                                                 42.0%
                         Wellness                               23.1%

                                      0        10          20        30        40         50        60          70

Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media video format only, a cross section of major verticals
only, January – December 2009




                                                      13
U.S. Benchmarks Comparison – 2008 vs. 2009

Figure 19: Overall Click-through Rates by Month for 2008 and 2009

          0.14

          0.12

          0.10

         0.08

         0.06

         0.04

         0.02

         0.00
        Month      1       2       3       4       5       6       7        8       9      10       11      12
        2008     0.12%   0.11%   0.10% 0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.10%           0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09%

        2009     0.12%   0.11%   0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09%


Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers U.S. campaigns, January 2008 – December 2009

Click-through rates tend to spike in January, possibly due to shoppers responding to post-holiday sales.
Otherwise, click-through rates overall tend to be consistent throughout the rest of year and similar to
click-through rates in 2008.




Figure 20: Overall Interaction Rates by Month for 2008 and 2009

           3.5

             3

           2.5

             2

           1.5

             1

           0.5

         0.00
        Month      1       2       3       4       5       6       7        8       9      10       11      12
        2008                             1.84%   1.77% 1.66%      1.81% 2.44% 2.38% 2.43% 2.35% 2.31%

        2009 2.96% 2.90% 2.79% 2.72% 2.52% 2.57% 2.60%                   2.53% 2.32% 2.29% 2.28% 2.27%
Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers campaigns, April 2008 – December 2009. In February 2008, DoubleClick upgraded the
methodology for counting interaction impressions and interaction times; benchmark data is available using this methodology
beginning April 2008.


Interaction rates have increased considerably in Q2 of 2009 year over year. They are stable across years
in the second half of the year.




                                                  14
Figure 21: Overall Expansion Rates by Month for 2008 and 2009
         4.00

         3.50

         3.00

         2.50

         2.00

          1.50

          1.00

         0.50

         0.00
        Month      1       2       3       4       5       6       7       8        9      10       11      12
        2008     1.85%   1.95%   1.89%   1.64% 1.96% 2.03% 2.37% 3.57% 3.49% 3.48% 3.38% 3.39%

        2009 3.48% 3.64% 3.47% 3.04% 2.78% 2.89% 2.71%                   2.80% 2.27% 1.97% 2.20% 2.14%


Expansion rates were generally declining from 2008 to 2009 but by the end of 2009, they were coming
back to their levels in early 2008.



Figure 22: Overall Interaction Time (secs) by Month for 2008 and 2009

            14

            12

            10

            8

            6

            4

             2

            0
        Month      1       2       3       4       5       6       7       8       9       10      11      12
        2008                              11.6    11.9    11.9    11.2    9.2     9.3      9.1     9.1     9.2      (secs)

        2009      8.1     8.0     8.2     8.5     8.9     8.7     9.2     9.3     9.5      9.7    9.5      9.7      (secs)


Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers campaigns, April 2008 – December 2009. In February 2008, DoubleClick upgraded the
methodology for counting interaction impressions and interaction times; benchmark data is available using this methodology
beginning April 2008.


While overall interaction times were declining month to month in 2008, we saw a steady increase in
overall interaction times in 2009.




                                                  15
Worldwide Overall Performance Norms

Figure 23: Overall Worldwide Click-Through Rates across Static Image, Flash and Rich Media Formats

 Region                                           Overall Click-Through Rate


 North America
 Canada                                           0.09%

 United States                                    0.10%



 EMEA

 Austria                                          0.11%

 Belgium                                          0.13%

 Denmark                                          0.12%

 Finland                                          0.05%

 France                                           0.12%

 Germany                                          0.11%

 Greece                                           0.17%

 Ireland                                          0.10%

 Italy                                            0.10%

 Luxembourg                                       0.09%

 Netherlands                                      0.14%

 Norway                                           0.11%

 Spain                                            0.12%

 Sweden                                           0.08%

 Switzerland                                      0.12%

 United Arab Emirates                             0.18%

 United Kingdom                                   0.07%



 JAPAC

 Australia                                        0.07%

 China                                            0.12%

 Hong Kong                                        0.17%

 India                                            0.18%

 Malaysia                                         0.30%

 Singapore                                        0.19%



Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, a cross section of regions, January – December 2009




                                                  16
Figure 24: DoubleClick Rich Media Metrics Across a Cross-Section of Regions


 Country          Interaction   Expansion      Video Complete    Average Interaction   Average Expanding      Average Display
                  Rate (%)      Rate (%)       Rate (%)          Time (secs)           Time (secs)            Time (secs)



 North America
 Canada           5.3%          6.4%           66.9%             6.6                   4.4                    47.1
 United States    2.5%          2.8%           50.0%             9.0                   4.7                    34.6


 EMEA
 Belgium          2.7%                                           7.7                                          31.1
 France           3.9%          7.4%           39.6%             7.1                   5.6                    27.6
 Germany          2.9%                         55.6%             8.6                                          33.3
 Ireland          2.2%          6.4%                             10. 5                 5.1                    37.4
 Italy            3.5%          7.1%           52.1%             7.5                   6.8                    36.1
 Luxembourg       2.1%          5.9%           39.5%             9.1                   7.5                    32. 6
 Netherlands      4.5%          7.3%                             7.5                   5.8                    34.9
 United           2.3%          5.1%           53.1%             9.6                   5.8                    35.2
 Kingdom


 JAPAC
 China            3.0%                                           7.1                                          15.5
 Hong Kong        6.0%          10.9%                            7.1                   7.0                    12.8
 Singapore        7.9%          9.2%           17.4%             6.5                   3.2                    30.3



Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, a cross section of regions with statistically significant rich media metrics,
January – December 2009




                                                       17
Appendix

Appendix A: About the Source Data
DoubleClick has built a robust software tool to analyze online advertising campaign activity across its
DART ad serving platform. Presently, the tool reports click-through rates, interaction rates, interaction
times, expansion rates, expansion times and video complete rates for ads for thousands of advertisers
using the DoubleClick for Advertisers (DFA) and DoubleClick Rich Media platforms. These data are
carefully normalized to reflect industry norms to the best of our ability. The Advertising Research
Foundation (ARF) was consulted on the design of this tool and advised on aspects of its methodological
design, including the use of medians instead of mean averages for the calculation of the benchmark
metrics noted above. Data shown here represent activity of a wide range of ad formats for DFA
advertisers in the United States unless otherwise indicated. The majority of data are from January
2009 to December 2009.
The dataset used for the DoubleClick benchmarks reports of the activity of thousands of DFA advertisers
that have been categorized by industry and country geography. Industry categories are defined by the
sub-categories they represent. To make category assignments, each DFA advertiser is assigned to a
single industry sub-category. Subcategory assignments then roll-up into category assignments. For
example, the Media and Entertainment industry category is a roll-up of advertiser data from seventeen
subcategories, including Music, Movies, Sports, Arts and others. To ensure statistical soundness as
well as client confidentiality, minimums have been applied to the data sets that can be reported on: at
least four advertisers and four DART networks must be represented for any metric to be reported at any
dimension of the data (e.g., by creative size, by time period).




Appendix B: Definition of Interaction Rate and Interactions
Interaction Rate: The ratio of DoubleClick Rich Media ad interactions to the number of rich media ad
impressions displayed. This number is reached using the following calculation:
      Interactions + Rich Media Impressions
Interactions: The number of times users interacted with a DoubleClick Rich Media ad.
An interaction is uniquely counted only once per impression.
Interactions are captured when the user does one or more of the following:
•   Mouses over the ad for 1 continuous second
•   Clicks an Exit link
•   Makes the ad display in Full Screen mode
•   Expands the ad




Appendix C: Definition of Average Interaction Time
Average Interaction Time: The average amount of time, in seconds, that a user interacts with
a DoubleClick Rich Media ad. Time from multiple interactions with an ad during a single ad view
are aggregated.




                                         18
Appendix D: Definition of Expansion Rate
Expansion Rate: Expansion rate is calculated by dividing Expansions by DoubleClick Rich Media
Expanding ad impressions.
Expansions are counted when a user expands the ad by either rolling over the ad or by clicking on it and
the ad reaches its expanded state.
An expansion is counted only once per impression




Appendix E: Definition of Average Expanding Time
Average Expanding Time: The average length of time, in seconds, that an expanding ad is viewed in its
expanded state. Time from multiple expansions during a single ad view are aggregated. Timer starts when
the ad reaches the expanded state and stops when it collapses.
Any expansion time that exceeds four minutes is capped. This extended expansion time can occur, for
example, when a user opens an expanding ad on his or her browser, then steps away for an hour without
collapsing the ad or closing the browser. The capping rule helps prevent skewed results.




Appendix F: Measuring Video Completes
The video complete rate is calculated by the following formula and definitions:
    Video Completes + Video Plays
Video Completes: The number of times a video played to its completion. For example, the number of
times a 15-second video plays for its full 15 seconds.
Video Plays: The number of impressions where a video started to play.
About DoubleClick
Google’s DoubleClick™ products provide ad management and ad serving solutions
to companies that buy, create or sell online advertising. The world’s top marketers,
publishers, ad networks and agencies use DoubleClick products as the foundation
for their online advertising businesses. With deep expertise in ad serving, media
planning, search management, rich media, video and mobile, DoubleClick products
help customers execute their digital media strategy more effectively.
For more information on DoubleClick solutions, contact a sales representative at
(212) 271-CLICK (2542) or visit www.doubleclick.com


www.doubleclick.com

© 2010 Google Inc. All rights reserved. Google, DoubleClick, the Google logo, and the DoubleClick logo are trademarks of Google Inc.
All other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.
2518548_100719

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Chris Tuff & Julie Tullis
Chris Tuff & Julie TullisChris Tuff & Julie Tullis
Chris Tuff & Julie Tullis
Mediabistro
 
Forbes insights sharethrough goingnative
Forbes insights sharethrough goingnativeForbes insights sharethrough goingnative
Forbes insights sharethrough goingnative
Edwin Warfield
 
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & OptimizationNext-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Vivastream
 
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & OptimizationSprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Vivastream
 
Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives
Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives
Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives
Francesca Savoldi
 
Millward-Brown Media Multiplier
Millward-Brown Media MultiplierMillward-Brown Media Multiplier
Millward-Brown Media Multiplier
Jason Snider
 
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011
Kenneth Lillie
 
Research: TV media buying optimisation with YouTube
Research: TV media buying optimisation with YouTubeResearch: TV media buying optimisation with YouTube
Research: TV media buying optimisation with YouTube
Mitya Voskresensky
 
WEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performance
WEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performanceWEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performance
WEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performance
ClickCommunity
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

DirecTV plansbook
DirecTV plansbookDirecTV plansbook
DirecTV plansbook
 
Chris Tuff & Julie Tullis
Chris Tuff & Julie TullisChris Tuff & Julie Tullis
Chris Tuff & Julie Tullis
 
Forbes insights sharethrough goingnative
Forbes insights sharethrough goingnativeForbes insights sharethrough goingnative
Forbes insights sharethrough goingnative
 
CONSUMER –BRAND RELATIONS IN A 360° WORLD
CONSUMER –BRAND RELATIONS IN A 360° WORLDCONSUMER –BRAND RELATIONS IN A 360° WORLD
CONSUMER –BRAND RELATIONS IN A 360° WORLD
 
State Of Online Video - TIMA presentation
State Of Online Video  - TIMA presentationState Of Online Video  - TIMA presentation
State Of Online Video - TIMA presentation
 
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & OptimizationNext-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
 
Airline advertising - A promising media
Airline advertising - A promising mediaAirline advertising - A promising media
Airline advertising - A promising media
 
An overview of measurement models and perceptions of ad effectiveness by Hann...
An overview of measurement models and perceptions of ad effectiveness by Hann...An overview of measurement models and perceptions of ad effectiveness by Hann...
An overview of measurement models and perceptions of ad effectiveness by Hann...
 
Putting the future_in_focus
Putting the future_in_focusPutting the future_in_focus
Putting the future_in_focus
 
House Party at DBS: All Earned Media is Not Created Equal: Winning Hearts, Mi...
House Party at DBS: All Earned Media is Not Created Equal: Winning Hearts, Mi...House Party at DBS: All Earned Media is Not Created Equal: Winning Hearts, Mi...
House Party at DBS: All Earned Media is Not Created Equal: Winning Hearts, Mi...
 
Advertising Exchange Whitepaper
Advertising Exchange WhitepaperAdvertising Exchange Whitepaper
Advertising Exchange Whitepaper
 
Guest Speaker Program
Guest Speaker ProgramGuest Speaker Program
Guest Speaker Program
 
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & OptimizationSprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
 
Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives
Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives
Align Facebook With Your Business Objectives
 
Millward-Brown Media Multiplier
Millward-Brown Media MultiplierMillward-Brown Media Multiplier
Millward-Brown Media Multiplier
 
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report Q4 2011
 
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report 2011
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report 2011TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report 2011
TBG Digital Global Facebook Advertising Report 2011
 
Report Global Facebook Advertising
Report Global Facebook AdvertisingReport Global Facebook Advertising
Report Global Facebook Advertising
 
Research: TV media buying optimisation with YouTube
Research: TV media buying optimisation with YouTubeResearch: TV media buying optimisation with YouTube
Research: TV media buying optimisation with YouTube
 
WEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performance
WEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performanceWEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performance
WEBTRENDS: Facebook advertising performance
 

Andere mochten auch

Trip to bristol
Trip   to   bristolTrip   to   bristol
Trip to bristol
mluisavm
 
алтанзул судалгаа
алтанзул судалгаа алтанзул судалгаа
алтанзул судалгаа
Altanzul79
 
Presentation TDG
Presentation TDGPresentation TDG
Presentation TDG
edofrederix
 
ประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัวประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัว
OomAmm Oom
 
ประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัวประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัว
OomAmm Oom
 

Andere mochten auch (13)

2015 09 23 sécurité des données de santé
2015 09 23    sécurité des données de santé2015 09 23    sécurité des données de santé
2015 09 23 sécurité des données de santé
 
Trip to bristol
Trip   to   bristolTrip   to   bristol
Trip to bristol
 
Sendgrid Deliverability Guide
Sendgrid Deliverability GuideSendgrid Deliverability Guide
Sendgrid Deliverability Guide
 
алтанзул судалгаа
алтанзул судалгаа алтанзул судалгаа
алтанзул судалгаа
 
Presentation TDG
Presentation TDGPresentation TDG
Presentation TDG
 
ประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัวประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัว
 
ประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัวประวัติส่วนตัว
ประวัติส่วนตัว
 
AD 70 - Investigating the End Times with Faith not Fear Part 10
AD 70 - Investigating the End Times with Faith not Fear Part 10AD 70 - Investigating the End Times with Faith not Fear Part 10
AD 70 - Investigating the End Times with Faith not Fear Part 10
 
Mkt preu
Mkt preuMkt preu
Mkt preu
 
Wasiat rasulullah dan para wali allah
Wasiat rasulullah dan para wali allahWasiat rasulullah dan para wali allah
Wasiat rasulullah dan para wali allah
 
сель селевые-потоки
сель селевые-потокисель селевые-потоки
сель селевые-потоки
 
Ecg fundamentals
Ecg fundamentalsEcg fundamentals
Ecg fundamentals
 
военнослужащий патриот
военнослужащий патриотвоеннослужащий патриот
военнослужащий патриот
 

Ähnlich wie Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, US, 07-2010

Time and Attention in Digital Advertising
Time and Attention in Digital AdvertisingTime and Attention in Digital Advertising
Time and Attention in Digital Advertising
Eyeblaster Spain
 
The Case For Viewable Impressions
The Case For Viewable ImpressionsThe Case For Viewable Impressions
The Case For Viewable Impressions
Peter Naylor
 
Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013
Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013
Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013
Brainient
 

Ähnlich wie Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, US, 07-2010 (20)

AdoTube Format Index Q3 2011
AdoTube Format Index Q3 2011AdoTube Format Index Q3 2011
AdoTube Format Index Q3 2011
 
DG - Digital 101
DG - Digital 101DG - Digital 101
DG - Digital 101
 
Online Display Advertising Benchmarks: DoubleClick Benchmarks Report
Online Display Advertising Benchmarks: DoubleClick Benchmarks ReportOnline Display Advertising Benchmarks: DoubleClick Benchmarks Report
Online Display Advertising Benchmarks: DoubleClick Benchmarks Report
 
Online Display Advertising
Online Display AdvertisingOnline Display Advertising
Online Display Advertising
 
The importance-of-being-seen study
The importance-of-being-seen studyThe importance-of-being-seen study
The importance-of-being-seen study
 
Google viewability study dec 2014
Google viewability study dec 2014Google viewability study dec 2014
Google viewability study dec 2014
 
Time and Attention in Digital Advertising
Time and Attention in Digital AdvertisingTime and Attention in Digital Advertising
Time and Attention in Digital Advertising
 
The importance of being seen
The importance of being seenThe importance of being seen
The importance of being seen
 
«Как важно быть увиденным» Google 2014
«Как важно быть увиденным» Google 2014«Как важно быть увиденным» Google 2014
«Как важно быть увиденным» Google 2014
 
The Case For Viewable Impressions
The Case For Viewable ImpressionsThe Case For Viewable Impressions
The Case For Viewable Impressions
 
Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013
Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013
Steve Chester- Breakfast & Brains October 2013
 
IAB US Presentation - Patrick Dolan for IAB Romania
IAB US Presentation - Patrick Dolan for IAB RomaniaIAB US Presentation - Patrick Dolan for IAB Romania
IAB US Presentation - Patrick Dolan for IAB Romania
 
STIMA Congress 2015: Stuart Wilkinson - Comscore
STIMA Congress 2015: Stuart Wilkinson - ComscoreSTIMA Congress 2015: Stuart Wilkinson - Comscore
STIMA Congress 2015: Stuart Wilkinson - Comscore
 
Tyroo Rich Media
Tyroo Rich MediaTyroo Rich Media
Tyroo Rich Media
 
The Brand Value Of Rich Media And Video Ads
The Brand Value Of Rich Media And Video AdsThe Brand Value Of Rich Media And Video Ads
The Brand Value Of Rich Media And Video Ads
 
Q3 2010 Format Index - AdoTube
Q3 2010 Format Index - AdoTubeQ3 2010 Format Index - AdoTube
Q3 2010 Format Index - AdoTube
 
Get Noticed: Using Creativity and Engaging Ad Formats to Break Through the Noise
Get Noticed: Using Creativity and Engaging Ad Formats to Break Through the NoiseGet Noticed: Using Creativity and Engaging Ad Formats to Break Through the Noise
Get Noticed: Using Creativity and Engaging Ad Formats to Break Through the Noise
 
Russell Barry, Eyeblaster, Mediacom Engage 19/05/10
Russell Barry, Eyeblaster, Mediacom Engage 19/05/10Russell Barry, Eyeblaster, Mediacom Engage 19/05/10
Russell Barry, Eyeblaster, Mediacom Engage 19/05/10
 
Intro to-online-advertising-greg-stuart
Intro to-online-advertising-greg-stuartIntro to-online-advertising-greg-stuart
Intro to-online-advertising-greg-stuart
 
Intro To Online Advertising Greg Stuart
Intro To Online Advertising Greg StuartIntro To Online Advertising Greg Stuart
Intro To Online Advertising Greg Stuart
 

Mehr von François-Yves Prigent

Mehr von François-Yves Prigent (20)

11 steps for better emailing results v5 - blog.digico.fr
11 steps for better emailing results v5 - blog.digico.fr11 steps for better emailing results v5 - blog.digico.fr
11 steps for better emailing results v5 - blog.digico.fr
 
12 steps for better emailing results v3
12 steps for better emailing results v312 steps for better emailing results v3
12 steps for better emailing results v3
 
Responsive email design guide
Responsive email design guideResponsive email design guide
Responsive email design guide
 
Infographie taux-abandon-panier
Infographie taux-abandon-panierInfographie taux-abandon-panier
Infographie taux-abandon-panier
 
ONLINE SHOPPER INTELLIGENCE - FRANCE - 4e trimestre 2011 - Kantar
ONLINE SHOPPER INTELLIGENCE - FRANCE - 4e trimestre 2011 - KantarONLINE SHOPPER INTELLIGENCE - FRANCE - 4e trimestre 2011 - Kantar
ONLINE SHOPPER INTELLIGENCE - FRANCE - 4e trimestre 2011 - Kantar
 
faberNovel: Why could google die?
faberNovel: Why could google die?faberNovel: Why could google die?
faberNovel: Why could google die?
 
faberNovel: Market your iPhone app
faberNovel: Market your iPhone appfaberNovel: Market your iPhone app
faberNovel: Market your iPhone app
 
Emarketing Paris 2012 : Awards
Emarketing Paris 2012 : AwardsEmarketing Paris 2012 : Awards
Emarketing Paris 2012 : Awards
 
First Aid Kit Tutorial / Cheat Sheet
First Aid Kit Tutorial / Cheat SheetFirst Aid Kit Tutorial / Cheat Sheet
First Aid Kit Tutorial / Cheat Sheet
 
Livre Blanc : Relation Client, ce qu’attendent les e-acheteurs – iAdvize
Livre Blanc : Relation Client, ce qu’attendent les e-acheteurs – iAdvizeLivre Blanc : Relation Client, ce qu’attendent les e-acheteurs – iAdvize
Livre Blanc : Relation Client, ce qu’attendent les e-acheteurs – iAdvize
 
IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report
IAB Internet Advertising Revenue ReportIAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report
IAB Internet Advertising Revenue Report
 
Modèles d'attribution : le guide du spécialiste en référencement payant
Modèles d'attribution : le guide du spécialiste en référencement payantModèles d'attribution : le guide du spécialiste en référencement payant
Modèles d'attribution : le guide du spécialiste en référencement payant
 
Etude E-commerce 2020 Malinea
Etude E-commerce 2020 MalineaEtude E-commerce 2020 Malinea
Etude E-commerce 2020 Malinea
 
Linked in tips for job seekers & reputation
Linked in tips for job seekers & reputationLinked in tips for job seekers & reputation
Linked in tips for job seekers & reputation
 
Email Emea study 2009
Email Emea study 2009Email Emea study 2009
Email Emea study 2009
 
Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, EMEA, 07-2010
Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, EMEA, 07-2010Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, EMEA, 07-2010
Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, EMEA, 07-2010
 
Ils ont réussi leur startup (livre)
Ils ont réussi leur startup (livre)Ils ont réussi leur startup (livre)
Ils ont réussi leur startup (livre)
 
Content is the fuel of social web : Aol & Nielsen Online 2011
Content is the fuel of social web : Aol & Nielsen Online 2011Content is the fuel of social web : Aol & Nielsen Online 2011
Content is the fuel of social web : Aol & Nielsen Online 2011
 
Advanced and technical SEO - Apr 2011 - Beijk martijn
Advanced and technical SEO - Apr 2011 - Beijk martijnAdvanced and technical SEO - Apr 2011 - Beijk martijn
Advanced and technical SEO - Apr 2011 - Beijk martijn
 
VoyagesSncf Marketing opérationnel - 22 10 2003
VoyagesSncf Marketing opérationnel - 22 10 2003 VoyagesSncf Marketing opérationnel - 22 10 2003
VoyagesSncf Marketing opérationnel - 22 10 2003
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service BangaloreCall Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
amitlee9823
 
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
dollysharma2066
 
Call Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service NoidaCall Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service Noida
dlhescort
 
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
amitlee9823
 
Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...
Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...
Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...
daisycvs
 
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
lizamodels9
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptxB.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
B.COM Unit – 4 ( CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ( CSR ).pptx
 
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMANA DAY IN THE LIFE OF A  SALESMAN / WOMAN
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A SALESMAN / WOMAN
 
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan CommunicationsPharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
Pharma Works Profile of Karan Communications
 
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRLMONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
MONA 98765-12871 CALL GIRLS IN LUDHIANA LUDHIANA CALL GIRL
 
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with CultureOrganizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
 
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service BangaloreCall Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
Call Girls Hebbal Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Service Bangalore
 
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataRSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
RSA Conference Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
 
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ludhiana Just Call 98765-12871 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
It will be International Nurses' Day on 12 May
It will be International Nurses' Day on 12 MayIt will be International Nurses' Day on 12 May
It will be International Nurses' Day on 12 May
 
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League CityHow to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
How to Get Started in Social Media for Art League City
 
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
FULL ENJOY Call Girls In Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi Contact Us 8377877756
 
BAGALUR CALL GIRL IN 98274*61493 ❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
BAGALUR CALL GIRL IN 98274*61493 ❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRLBAGALUR CALL GIRL IN 98274*61493 ❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
BAGALUR CALL GIRL IN 98274*61493 ❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
 
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
Ensure the security of your HCL environment by applying the Zero Trust princi...
 
Call Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service NoidaCall Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service Noida
Call Girls In Noida 959961⊹3876 Independent Escort Service Noida
 
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
Call Girls Electronic City Just Call 👗 7737669865 👗 Top Class Call Girl Servi...
 
Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...
Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...
Quick Doctor In Kuwait +2773`7758`557 Kuwait Doha Qatar Dubai Abu Dhabi Sharj...
 
VVVIP Call Girls In Greater Kailash ➡️ Delhi ➡️ 9999965857 🚀 No Advance 24HRS...
VVVIP Call Girls In Greater Kailash ➡️ Delhi ➡️ 9999965857 🚀 No Advance 24HRS...VVVIP Call Girls In Greater Kailash ➡️ Delhi ➡️ 9999965857 🚀 No Advance 24HRS...
VVVIP Call Girls In Greater Kailash ➡️ Delhi ➡️ 9999965857 🚀 No Advance 24HRS...
 
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
Mondelez State of Snacking and Future Trends 2023
 
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
Call Girls From Pari Chowk Greater Noida ❤️8448577510 ⊹Best Escorts Service I...
 
Falcon Invoice Discounting platform in india
Falcon Invoice Discounting platform in indiaFalcon Invoice Discounting platform in india
Falcon Invoice Discounting platform in india
 

Doubleclick Display Benchmark Report 2009, US, 07-2010

  • 1. 2009 Year-in-Review Benchmarks A DoubleClick Report Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................2 Static Image and Flash Benchmarks ......................3 Rich Media Ad Benchmarks .......................................5 Benchmarks Comparison 2008 vs. 2009 ............14 Worldwide Overall Performance Norms .................16
  • 2. White Paper | DoubleCilck 2009 Year-in-Review Benchmarks The DoubleClick Benchmarks Report is a free report of industry benchmarks that About DoubleClick helps advertisers, agencies, and publishers evaluate the performance of online Google’s DoubleClick products provide ad ™ management and ad serving solutions to display advertising campaigns in the U.S., relative to industry norms. companies that buy, create or sell online DoubleClick benchmarks are derived from a robust data set of metrics across advertising. The world’s top marketers, publishers, ad networks and agencies use DoubleClick DoubleClick for Advertisers (DFA), based on rigorous methodology with input products as the foundation for their online from the Advertising Research Foundation. This data set includes hundreds of advertising businesses. With deep expertise in advertisers, thousands of campaigns, and tens of billions of ad impressions. ad serving, media planning, search management, rich media, video and mobile, our DoubleClick Data shown here represent activity of a wide range of ad formats for DFA products help customers execute their digital advertisers in the United States unless otherwise indicated. For all benchmarks media strategy more effectively. provided in this report, the data are from January 2009 to December 2009. For more information visit: Executive Summary www.doubleclick.com Overall U.S. campaign performance norms for 2009 across DoubleClick image, Flash, and rich media campaigns are as follows: Click-through Rate (CTR) 0.10% Video Complete Rate 50% Interaction Rate 2.54% Average Display Time 34.6 secs Average Interaction Time 9.0 secs Average Expanding Time 4.7 secs Expansion Rate 2.8% Key Observations: Ad size correlates with clicks and interaction rates. As in previous years, we have observed that ad size is somewhat correlated with click-through rate. This is also true with interaction rates except for one anomaly – the ad size that has the highest interaction rate overall is the square pop-under (250x250), although it’s important to note this size is one of the least common creative sizes served through DFA. Static ads and flash ad click-through rates remained relatively stable from 2008 to 2009. In 2009, static ads perform slightly better than flash ads in terms of click- throughs when you compare them by creative size. However when you compare them by industry vertical there was virtually no difference in click-through rates between static and flash ads. This suggests that differences in click-through rates between flash and static ads are due more to ad vertical rather than format. We also observed that expansion rates declined from 2008 to 2009 while overall interaction rates increased in 2009. DFA Impressions by Creative Type Data on the distribution of impressions by type of creative format was a popular request in response to last year’s benchmarks report so we included this information in the report this year. Note that as with other benchmarks in this report, this data reflects impressions served through the DoubleClick for Advertisers platform. 2
  • 3. 2009 DFA Impressions Image 20% Rich Media In-page 5% Rich Media Expanding 2% Rich Media Video 2% Rich Media In-page Video 2% Flash 69% Source: DoubleClick Benchmarks, U.S. DFA campaigns, January – December 2009 Static Image Ads and Flash Ads Benchmarks Overall Click-Through Rate (CTR) Static Ads 0.10% Flash Ads 0.09% Figure 1: Click-through Rate by Creative Sizes for Static Image and Flash Ads Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 0.09% 0.10% Vertical Rectangle: 240x400 0.19% 0.28% Verical Banner: 120x240 0.05% 0.06% Square Pop-Up: 250x250 0.16% 0.23% Skyscraper: 120x600 0.07% 0.10% Rectangle: 180x150 0.09% 0.11% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 0.10% 0.12% Leaderboard: 728x90 0.08% 0.09% Large Rectangle: 336x280 0.09% 0.14% Half Page Ad: 300x600 0.18% 0.17% Half Banner: 234x60 0.06% 0.06% Full Banner: 468x60 0.05% 0.08% 3:1 Rectangle: 300x100 0.05% 0.06% 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Flash click-through rate% Static click-through rate% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, a cross section of major ad sizes only, January – December 2009 3
  • 4. Figure 2: Click-Through Rate for Static Image and Flash Ads by Industry Vertical Auto 0.15% 0.14% Brands 0.10% 0.12% B2B 0.08% 0.09% Classified and Local 0.07% 0.10% CPG 0.09% 0.10% Financial Services 0.06% 0.07% Media/Entertainment 0.10% 0.11% Retail 0.08% 0.11% Tech 0.09% 0.12% Telecom 0.06% 0.07% Travel 0.08% 0.09% Wellness 0.08% 0.11% 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 Flash click-through rate% Static click-through rate% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, a cross section of major industry verticals only, January – December 2009 4
  • 5. Rich Media Ad Benchmarks • Preface: A Primer on Evaluating Rich Media Ad Metrics • Overall Rich Media Performance Norms • Click-through Rate • Interaction Rate and Expansion Rate • Average Display Time, Interaction Time, and Expanding Time • Video Complete Rate Preface: A Primer on Evaluating Rich Media Ad Metrics A rich media ad unit can inspire a range of responses from users — not every click in a rich media unit produces a click-through. When a viewer clicks on a rich media unit, a number of outcomes are possible, including expanding the unit, playing a video or otherwise interacting with the unit. The call-to-action for a viewer to click-through competes with all other possible forms of interaction within the unit. As a result, click-through rates can be lower for rich media than for other forms of online advertising where the clickthrough is the only form of user interaction. The objective of rich media ads isn’t always to drive clicks — they are often used to provide users with an experience within the ad itself. Therefore, engagement metrics such as interaction rates, interactions times, video completion, and expansions are important measures of the success of such ads. Also keep in mind that conversion activity can happen within the ad unit itself: A click could result in the user downloading a report from the ad unit, signing up for more information through a form on the ad unit, locating a product by zip code, or playing a video within the ad unit. Advertisers should consider the goals of the campaign at hand, and evaluate the performance of their campaigns based on the most relevant rich media ad metric. Overall Rich Media Performance Norms Click-through Rate (CTR) 0.10% Video Complete Rate 50% Interaction Rate 2.5% Average Display Time 34.6 secs Average Interaction Time 8.9 secs Average Expanding Time 4.7 secs Expansion Rate 2.8% Key Observations Differences between non-video and video for rich media in-page ads in terms of interaction rate were not considerably different (see figure 7), except for the large rectangle where video outperformed non-video by a large margin (4.0% vs. 2.7% respectively). In-page video click-through rate was down for half-page ad size, from 0.3% in 2008 down to 0.1% in 2009. The other ads sizes remained relatively the same from year to year. In contrast to the 2008 benchmarks where we saw video outperform non-video ads across the board, we observed that in 2009 non-video rich media expanding ads performed better than video ads both in terms of interaction and expansion rates. (Figures 14 and 15). Video completes for rich media in-page went down a little over 6% from 2008 to 2009 from 62.3% in in 2008 to 56.3% in 2009 (see page 13). Compared to 2008 benchmarks we found that in 2009 more people interacted with and expanded rich media ads but the time they spent interacting, expanding or finishing a video ad has declined from 2008. Increases in overall rich media metrics – 2008 to 2009 • Rich media average display time increased from 32.1 secs to 34.6 secs • Rich media click-through rate went up from 0.09% to 0.11% • Rich media interaction rate rose from 2.1% to 2.5% • Rich media expansion rate rose from 2.5% to 2.8% 5
  • 6. Declines in overall rich media metrics – 2008 to 2009 • Average interaction time from 10.3 secs to 9.0 secs • Video complete rate from 54.5% to 50.0% • Average expanding time from 6.5 secs to 4.7 secs Click-through Rate by DoubleClick Rich Media Format Video exhibits higher click-through rates than non-video for both in-page as well as expanding rich media formats. Figure 3: Click-through Rate by DoubleClick Rich Media Format 0.14 0.12 0.1 1% 0.11% 0.10% 0.10% 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media Expanding (Non-video) Expanding (Video) In-page (Non-video) In-page (Video) Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page and expanding formats only, January – December 2009 Click-through Rate (CTR) by Creative Size for in-page and Expanding DoubleClick Rich Media Formats Figure 4: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Click-through Rate for video and non-video 0.10% Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 0.12% Skyscraper: 120x600 0.13% 0.11% Rectangle: 180x150 0.36% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 0.12% 0.14% Leaderboard: 728x90 0.06% 0.08% Large Rectangle: 336x280 0.12% 0.09% Half Page Ad: 300x600 0.11% 0.20% Full Banner: 468x60 0.05% 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 Video click-through rate% Non-video click-through rate% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 6
  • 7. Figure 5: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Click-through Rate for video and non-video Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 0.11% 0.09% Skyscraper: 120x600 0.10% 0.07% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 0.12% 0.12% Leaderboard: 728x90 0.08% 0.08% Large Rectangle: 336x280 0.15% 0.13% Half Page Ad: 300x600 0.18% 0.22% 0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 Video click-through rate% Non-video% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 Interaction and Expansion Rates Non-video rich media expanding ads have both a higher expansion rate and a higher interaction rate compared to video ads and in-page non-video ads. Figure 6: Interaction Rate and Expansion Rate by DoubleClick Rich Media Format 5.00 4.50 4.00 3.99% 3.50 3.08% 3.09% 3.00 2.56% 2.50 2.21% 2.27% 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media In-page (Non-video) Expanding (Non-video) In-page (Video) Expanding (Video) Interaction Rate % Expansion Rate % Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in page and expanding formats only, January – December 2009 7
  • 8. Interaction Rate by Creative Size Figure 7: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Interaction Rate for video and non-video Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 2.4% 2.3% 1.9% Skyscraper: 120x600 1.7% Rectangle: 180x150 1.2% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 2.8% 2.5% Leaderboard: 728x90 1.7% 1.8% Large Rectangle: 336x280 4.0% 2.7% Half Page Ad: 300x600 4.1% 4.5% Full Banner: 468x60 0.7% 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Video interaction rate % Non-video interaction rate % Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 Interaction Rate and Expansion Rate by Creative Size Figure 8: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Interaction Rate for video and non-video Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 2.9% 2.9% Skyscraper: 120x600 1.3% 2.9% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 3.4% 4.5% Leaderboard: 728x90 2.7% 3.9% Large Rectangle: 336x280 4.0% 5.2% Half Page Ad: 300x600 4.6% 6.9% 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 Video interaction rate % Non-video interaction rate % Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 8
  • 9. Figure 9: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Expansion Rate for video and non-video Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 1.8% 2.4% Skyscraper: 120x600 2.3% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 2.1% 3.0% Leaderboard: 728x90 2.8% 3.5% Large Rectangle: 336x280 2.9% 4.3% Half Page Ad: 300x600 1.3% 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 Video Expansion Rate % Non-video Expansion Rate % Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 Figure 10: Click-through Rate by Industry Vertical for DoubleClick Rich Media Format Auto 0.15% B2B 0.08% CPG 0.09% Financial Services 0.06% Media/Entertainment 0.10% Retail 0.09% Tech 0.10% Telecom 0.07% Travel 0.08% Wellness 0.09% 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media formats only, a cross section of major industry verticals only, January – December 2009 9
  • 10. Figure 11: Interaction Rate, and Expansion Rate by Industry Vertical for DoubleClick Rich Media Format Auto 2.0% 2.2% B2B 8.4% 6.3% CPG 3.5% 3.1% Financial Services 3.5% 2.9% Media/Entertainment 1.7% 2.7% Retail 2.4% 3.0% Tech 3.5% 2.5% Telecom 2.9% 2.4% Travel 2.4% 2.5% Wellness 3.4% 3.8% 0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 Expansion Rate % Interaction Rate% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media formats only, a cross section of major industry verticals only, January – December 2009 Figure 12: Average Display Time (secs), Interaction Time (secs), and Expanding Time (secs) by DoubleClick Rich Media Format 45.00 40.00 38.37 35.24 35.00 32.62 30.92 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.12 10.8 10.00 8.05 6.16 5.00 4.24 3.56 0.00 DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media DoubleClick Rich Media In-page (Non-video) Expanding (Non-video) In-page (Video) Expanding (Video) Average Interaction Time Average Display Time Average Expanding Time Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 10
  • 11. Average Display Time, Interaction Time, and Expanding Time by Creative Size and Rich Media Format Figure 13: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Average Display Time (secs) for video and non-video 36.6 Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 33.8 35.4 Skyscraper: 120x600 36.6 Rectangle: 180x150 29.0 Medium Rectangle: 300x250 37.9 34.9 Leaderboard: 728x90 40.3 36.2 Large Rectangle: 336x280 53.2 54.8 Half Page Ad: 300x600 41.3 38.4 Full Banner: 468x60 35.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (secs) Video Average Display Time Non-video Average Display Time Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 Figure 14: DoubleClick Rich Media in-page Average Interaction Time (secs) for Video and non-video Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 11.1 9.7 10.5 Skyscraper: 120x600 10.5 Rectangle: 180x150 5.2 Medium Rectangle: 300x250 10.5 10.3 Leaderboard: 728x90 11.8 10.2 11.9 Large Rectangle: 336x280 13.1 Half Page Ad: 300x600 14.2 11.4 Full Banner: 468x60 10.5 0 5 10 15 (secs) Video Average Interaction Time Non-video Average Interaction Time Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 11
  • 12. Figure 15: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable non-video Average Display Time (secs), Expanding Time (secs), and Interaction Time (secs) 5.3 Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 4.6 29.6 5.3 Skyscraper: 120x600 6.6 30.5 4.7 Medium Rectangle: 300x250 4.0 32.4 3.2 Leaderboard: 728x90 2.6% 34.0 4.3 Large Rectangle: 336x280 5.4 45.3 7.6 Half Page Ad: 300x600 3.2 53.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (secs) Average Interaction Time Average Expanding Time Average Display Time Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 Figure 16: DoubleClick Rich Media Expandable Video Average Display Time (secs), Expanding Time (secs), and Interaction Time (secs) 6.1 Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 9.5 27.6 Skyscraper: 120x600 6.5 28.9 6.8 Medium Rectangle: 300x250 7.8 30.8 5.0 Leaderboard: 728x90 7.8 32.4 5.7 Large Rectangle: 336x280 9.3 51.1 8.5 Half Page Ad: 300x600 11.9 29.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 (secs) Average Interaction Time Average Expanding Time Average Display Time Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media expanding format only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 12
  • 13. Video Complete Rate DoubleClick Rich Media Expanding 38.5 DoubleClick Rich Media in-page 56.3% Figure 17: Video Complete Rate for DoubleClick Rich Media in-page (Video) and Expandable (Video) by Creative Size Wide Skyscraper: 160x600 40.0% 60.8% Skyscraper: 120x600 34.4% 66.8% Medium Rectangle: 300x250 40.2% 54.7% Leaderboard: 728x90 35.1% 59.7% Large Rectangle: 336x280 37.5% 61.8% Half Page Ad: 300x600 42.3% 39.8% 0 20 40 60 80 Expandable Video Complete Rate % In-page Video Complete Rate % Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media in-page and expanding formats only, a cross section of standard ad sizes only, January – December 2009 Figure 18: Video Complete Rate by Industry Vertical Auto 61.5% B2B 34.1% CPG 48.8% Financial Services 46.2% Media/Entertainment 35.9% Retail 21.2% Tech 56.0% Telecom 46.7% Travel 42.0% Wellness 23.1% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, U.S. advertisers, DoubleClick Rich Media video format only, a cross section of major verticals only, January – December 2009 13
  • 14. U.S. Benchmarks Comparison – 2008 vs. 2009 Figure 19: Overall Click-through Rates by Month for 2008 and 2009 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2008 0.12% 0.11% 0.10% 0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.10% 0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 2009 0.12% 0.11% 0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.10% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% 0.09% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers U.S. campaigns, January 2008 – December 2009 Click-through rates tend to spike in January, possibly due to shoppers responding to post-holiday sales. Otherwise, click-through rates overall tend to be consistent throughout the rest of year and similar to click-through rates in 2008. Figure 20: Overall Interaction Rates by Month for 2008 and 2009 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0.00 Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2008 1.84% 1.77% 1.66% 1.81% 2.44% 2.38% 2.43% 2.35% 2.31% 2009 2.96% 2.90% 2.79% 2.72% 2.52% 2.57% 2.60% 2.53% 2.32% 2.29% 2.28% 2.27% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers campaigns, April 2008 – December 2009. In February 2008, DoubleClick upgraded the methodology for counting interaction impressions and interaction times; benchmark data is available using this methodology beginning April 2008. Interaction rates have increased considerably in Q2 of 2009 year over year. They are stable across years in the second half of the year. 14
  • 15. Figure 21: Overall Expansion Rates by Month for 2008 and 2009 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2008 1.85% 1.95% 1.89% 1.64% 1.96% 2.03% 2.37% 3.57% 3.49% 3.48% 3.38% 3.39% 2009 3.48% 3.64% 3.47% 3.04% 2.78% 2.89% 2.71% 2.80% 2.27% 1.97% 2.20% 2.14% Expansion rates were generally declining from 2008 to 2009 but by the end of 2009, they were coming back to their levels in early 2008. Figure 22: Overall Interaction Time (secs) by Month for 2008 and 2009 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 2008 11.6 11.9 11.9 11.2 9.2 9.3 9.1 9.1 9.2 (secs) 2009 8.1 8.0 8.2 8.5 8.9 8.7 9.2 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.7 (secs) Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers campaigns, April 2008 – December 2009. In February 2008, DoubleClick upgraded the methodology for counting interaction impressions and interaction times; benchmark data is available using this methodology beginning April 2008. While overall interaction times were declining month to month in 2008, we saw a steady increase in overall interaction times in 2009. 15
  • 16. Worldwide Overall Performance Norms Figure 23: Overall Worldwide Click-Through Rates across Static Image, Flash and Rich Media Formats Region Overall Click-Through Rate North America Canada 0.09% United States 0.10% EMEA Austria 0.11% Belgium 0.13% Denmark 0.12% Finland 0.05% France 0.12% Germany 0.11% Greece 0.17% Ireland 0.10% Italy 0.10% Luxembourg 0.09% Netherlands 0.14% Norway 0.11% Spain 0.12% Sweden 0.08% Switzerland 0.12% United Arab Emirates 0.18% United Kingdom 0.07% JAPAC Australia 0.07% China 0.12% Hong Kong 0.17% India 0.18% Malaysia 0.30% Singapore 0.19% Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, a cross section of regions, January – December 2009 16
  • 17. Figure 24: DoubleClick Rich Media Metrics Across a Cross-Section of Regions Country Interaction Expansion Video Complete Average Interaction Average Expanding Average Display Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%) Time (secs) Time (secs) Time (secs) North America Canada 5.3% 6.4% 66.9% 6.6 4.4 47.1 United States 2.5% 2.8% 50.0% 9.0 4.7 34.6 EMEA Belgium 2.7% 7.7 31.1 France 3.9% 7.4% 39.6% 7.1 5.6 27.6 Germany 2.9% 55.6% 8.6 33.3 Ireland 2.2% 6.4% 10. 5 5.1 37.4 Italy 3.5% 7.1% 52.1% 7.5 6.8 36.1 Luxembourg 2.1% 5.9% 39.5% 9.1 7.5 32. 6 Netherlands 4.5% 7.3% 7.5 5.8 34.9 United 2.3% 5.1% 53.1% 9.6 5.8 35.2 Kingdom JAPAC China 3.0% 7.1 15.5 Hong Kong 6.0% 10.9% 7.1 7.0 12.8 Singapore 7.9% 9.2% 17.4% 6.5 3.2 30.3 Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, a cross section of regions with statistically significant rich media metrics, January – December 2009 17
  • 18. Appendix Appendix A: About the Source Data DoubleClick has built a robust software tool to analyze online advertising campaign activity across its DART ad serving platform. Presently, the tool reports click-through rates, interaction rates, interaction times, expansion rates, expansion times and video complete rates for ads for thousands of advertisers using the DoubleClick for Advertisers (DFA) and DoubleClick Rich Media platforms. These data are carefully normalized to reflect industry norms to the best of our ability. The Advertising Research Foundation (ARF) was consulted on the design of this tool and advised on aspects of its methodological design, including the use of medians instead of mean averages for the calculation of the benchmark metrics noted above. Data shown here represent activity of a wide range of ad formats for DFA advertisers in the United States unless otherwise indicated. The majority of data are from January 2009 to December 2009. The dataset used for the DoubleClick benchmarks reports of the activity of thousands of DFA advertisers that have been categorized by industry and country geography. Industry categories are defined by the sub-categories they represent. To make category assignments, each DFA advertiser is assigned to a single industry sub-category. Subcategory assignments then roll-up into category assignments. For example, the Media and Entertainment industry category is a roll-up of advertiser data from seventeen subcategories, including Music, Movies, Sports, Arts and others. To ensure statistical soundness as well as client confidentiality, minimums have been applied to the data sets that can be reported on: at least four advertisers and four DART networks must be represented for any metric to be reported at any dimension of the data (e.g., by creative size, by time period). Appendix B: Definition of Interaction Rate and Interactions Interaction Rate: The ratio of DoubleClick Rich Media ad interactions to the number of rich media ad impressions displayed. This number is reached using the following calculation: Interactions + Rich Media Impressions Interactions: The number of times users interacted with a DoubleClick Rich Media ad. An interaction is uniquely counted only once per impression. Interactions are captured when the user does one or more of the following: • Mouses over the ad for 1 continuous second • Clicks an Exit link • Makes the ad display in Full Screen mode • Expands the ad Appendix C: Definition of Average Interaction Time Average Interaction Time: The average amount of time, in seconds, that a user interacts with a DoubleClick Rich Media ad. Time from multiple interactions with an ad during a single ad view are aggregated. 18
  • 19. Appendix D: Definition of Expansion Rate Expansion Rate: Expansion rate is calculated by dividing Expansions by DoubleClick Rich Media Expanding ad impressions. Expansions are counted when a user expands the ad by either rolling over the ad or by clicking on it and the ad reaches its expanded state. An expansion is counted only once per impression Appendix E: Definition of Average Expanding Time Average Expanding Time: The average length of time, in seconds, that an expanding ad is viewed in its expanded state. Time from multiple expansions during a single ad view are aggregated. Timer starts when the ad reaches the expanded state and stops when it collapses. Any expansion time that exceeds four minutes is capped. This extended expansion time can occur, for example, when a user opens an expanding ad on his or her browser, then steps away for an hour without collapsing the ad or closing the browser. The capping rule helps prevent skewed results. Appendix F: Measuring Video Completes The video complete rate is calculated by the following formula and definitions: Video Completes + Video Plays Video Completes: The number of times a video played to its completion. For example, the number of times a 15-second video plays for its full 15 seconds. Video Plays: The number of impressions where a video started to play.
  • 20. About DoubleClick Google’s DoubleClick™ products provide ad management and ad serving solutions to companies that buy, create or sell online advertising. The world’s top marketers, publishers, ad networks and agencies use DoubleClick products as the foundation for their online advertising businesses. With deep expertise in ad serving, media planning, search management, rich media, video and mobile, DoubleClick products help customers execute their digital media strategy more effectively. For more information on DoubleClick solutions, contact a sales representative at (212) 271-CLICK (2542) or visit www.doubleclick.com www.doubleclick.com © 2010 Google Inc. All rights reserved. Google, DoubleClick, the Google logo, and the DoubleClick logo are trademarks of Google Inc. All other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated. 2518548_100719