SONA report for june 2010 & Q2
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
0 gefällt mir•260 views
The document summarizes AIESEC Romania's organizational performance for June 2010 and the second quarter. Key points include: - Exchange realizations increased 42.3% year-over-year but were 39.4% below plan. Membership declined 8.1% from May. - Revenue came from various sources including corporate (36%), exchanges (16%), and grants (33%). Seven local committees could support over 3 months of operations from reserves. - Realizations for the second quarter were up year-over-year but below plan, with the top three performing committees being Iasi, Brasov, and Oradea. Overall achievement for the quarter was 77.4% of plan.
![AIESEC Romania Report ,[object Object]](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/sonareportforjune2010-100712023307-phpapp02/85/SONA-report-for-june-2010-Q2-1-320.jpg)
![Introduction ,[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Ähnlich wie SONA report for june 2010 & Q2
Ähnlich wie SONA report for june 2010 & Q2 (20)
Mehr von Michael Omescu
Mehr von Michael Omescu (8)
SONA report for june 2010 & Q2
- 4. 1. Exchange status - Performance vs last year
- 5. 1. Exchange status - Realized vs Planned for June
- 8. 2. Membership Status - No of Active Members
- 9. 2. Membership Status - Members efficiency
- 12. 3. Financial situation - Revenue Diversification
- 13. 3. Financial situation - Revenue Diversification for Country
- 14. 3. Financial situation - Grant Applications
- 15. 3. Financial situation - Reserve Policy *Calculated using the following formula: Reserve fund/Operational budget per month
- 18. 4. Q 2 Report - MoS realized vs. last year for AIESEC Ro * Reporting in SONA has some issues for some LCs, data was taken from the Platform
- 19. 4. Q 2 Report - MoS Planned vs. Realized for AIESEC Ro AIESEC Ro overall achievement for Q 2 of MoS: 77.4% * Reporting in SONA has some issues for some LCs, data was taken from the Platform
- 20. 4. Q 2 Report - LCs MoS Realizations
- 21. 4. Q 2 Report - Clustering Map Simulation* * Disclosure - the Clustering Map is based on a Clustering Simulation that has only data for 2 months (for the Efficiency KPI), as so the data may not be accurate. This simulation is done only to test the clustering system and we will realize an accurate map for Q3. GL LC Performance Score Efficiency Score Romania 8.05 4.08 Brasov 9.25 4.52 Bucuresti 4.41 3.33 Cluj Napoca 9.33 3.65 Craiova 6.25 3.68 Constanta 6 2.28 Galati 4.50 3.29 Iasi 10 3.53 Oradea 9 2.31 Pitesti 9 2.88 Ploiesti 7 3.86 Sibiu 1.5 2.47 Targu Mures 10 2.62 Timisoara 7.90 3.56
- 25. Thank You