Bullet points from the group discussions at the end of the symposium

2. Public education about juries

3. Support for juries

4. Need for recognition of jurisdictional differences

5. Value of methodological differences

6. Mock v real

7. Maximising effectiveness of each method

8. Ecological validity

9. Value of cross-disciplinary research

10. Measures of jury performance

12. Mailing list

13. Advertising related events

14. Finding expertise

15. Applying for funding

16. Inviting speakers

17. Interaction with practitioners/bench

18. Annual events

19. Examination of fundamental normative question: “What are juries for (now, here)?”

20. Comparative/cross-jurisdictional law

21. Scotland

22. England/Wales/NI

23. Ireland

24. Italy

25. South Africa

26. Japan

27. Australia/NZ

28. Methodological support

29. Legal Empirical Research Support Network

30. More research on Comprehension

31. Decision-making

32. Evaluation of evidence

33. Application of law

34. Deliberations

35. Accountability

36. Expert evidence