SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 12
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
May 2005                                                                                                                    White Paper




                                                                                          Rich Media:
                                                                                          At The Tipping Point
      Sponsored by


Impetus: The US Internet quietly passed an important milestone late last year, as the number of broadband users
surpassed dial-up users for the first time. More than one-third of all US households will be broadband-enabled by the
end of 2005. Spurred by the wide availability of broadband, the use of rich media in advertising will grow sharply over
the next five years. The wider prominence of rich media and the strong response rate to rich media ads will stimulate
new creative activity—and that creativity could well lead to even more interest in rich media ads among advertisers
and ad agencies.
                                                                            063872


US Rich Media Ad Spending, 2000-2008 (in millions)                                   Overview
                                                                                     The mass broadband audience has arrived. The shift to fast
       2000     $161
                                                                                     connection in the home and the office has created a substantial
       2001     $177
                                                                                     audience for marketers employing rich media advertising. Rich
2002        $301                                                                     media advertising totaled roughly $800 million in 2004,
2003                   $581                                                          accounting for less than 10% of all online advertising. eMarketer
2004*                          $808                                                  expects the category to register gains of more than 25% through
                                                                                     2007, and spending as a whole will reach $2.2 billion by 2008.
2005                                  $1,093
                                                                                     Growth will come not only in absolute numbers but also as a
2006                                           $1,407
                                                                                     share of the overall market, as traditional advertisers look to rich
2007                                                        $1,794                   media for branding opportunities. But there are obstacles to
2008                                                             $2,200              overcome. Click-through rates are strong, but Internet users
Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against
                                                                                     could become disaffected if they are bombarded with boring,
the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)              irrelevant or repetitive ads. Targeting and frequency capping will
data, for which the last quarter measured was Q4 2004; *as of 2004,
interstitial ads included in rich media                                              be critical for both direct and brand marketing efforts, and,
Source: eMarketer, March 2005                                                        perhaps more so with rich media than with other types of online
063872 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                            www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                     advertising, strong creative work will be crucial.

                                                                                     Issues & Questions
                                                                                     s What rich media standards are emerging?

                                                                                     s What are the best ways to measure rich media results?

                                                                                     s Which formats work best—and when?

                                                                                     s Which strategies are capturing consumer attention?




                                                                                     The First Place to Look
Advertising.com Welcome Letter                                                 The eMarketer Outlook

Dear Marketer,                                                                 The use of audio, video, animation, and
It moves, it speaks, it engages and captures the attention of an               interactivity has been a siren song for advertisers
audience like virtually no other online advertising format. It’s
called rich media advertising - and with the approaching demise                since the emergence of the Internet. The first
of dialup, it’s here to stay.                                                  generation of animated ads showed both the
Sponsored by Advertising.com, this report explores the                         promise and peril of the new medium – “Look! It
increasingly influential role rich media advertising is playing in the         moves!” followed by “Oh, no! It crashed my
new broadband-dominant world of Internet advertising. Using
motion (animated or video), sound and interactivity, rich media                browser!” Then came abuse and overuse—the
advertising offers important advantages for advertisers with                   ubiquitous “blink,” the endless loop, the audio file
diverse goals. For brand marketers, it allows advertisements to
                                                                               that played without permission. Web publishers
engage audiences at an emotional level once reserved for
television. For direct response marketers, it offers click-through             moved to clamp down on these early forms of
rates as much as five times higher than static display ads. These              rich media, and for years many publishers viewed
factors, the new predominance of high-speed Internet access,
and the simple fact that sixty percent of American households are
                                                                               rich media ads with suspicion.
now online are all contributing to double-digit growth in rich media
                                                                               The landscape has changed, and widespread broadband Internet
ad spending.
                                                                               access has been a key. Web sites, once dubious about the format,
This report is critical reading for virtually anyone with a stake in the       now welcome rich media advertising. Indeed, DoubleClick says
future of online advertising. The data captured here are fascinating           that some 43% of the ads it serves are rich media. But the growth
and sometimes staggering, and although technological and                       phase is far from over: Mike Henry, director of advertising sales for
financial hurdles will make the road ahead rocky for some in our               The Wall Street Journal Online, estimates that rich media ads on
industry, the statistics clearly support one conclusion. In the                WSJ.com jumped by 60% in 2004, with more increases expected
coming months and years, rich media advertising will increasingly              this year.
influence how advertisers and agencies approach online
                                                                               The increased use of rich media for advertising will likewise increase
marketing, how publishers compete for advertising revenue, and
                                                                               attention on measurement. Brand marketers can’t spend significant
how we all experience the Internet.
                                                                               dollars without getting clear usage reports. But eMarketer expects
                                                                               measurement to become more accurate as the category grows, in
                                                                               part because control-group benchmarks will be more reliable.
Sincerely,                                                                     Similarly, measurement should become easier because reporting will
                                                                               become built into the buy, rather than added as an afterthought.
Scott Ferber
CEO
Advertising.com




     Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                          An eMarketer White Paper                                                            2
Implications for Your Business                                               A. Defining Rich Media

For Brand Marketers                                                          Before looking at the rich media marketplace,
The growth of broadband, the expanding universe of Internet                  it’s important to understand what “rich media”
users, and the widening array of available rich media formats and
technologies mean that brand marketers can no longer overlook                means. Some define rich media by technology,
online advertising. Brand marketers not advertising on the Internet          some by content.
today are like their counterparts 10 years ago who failed to
embrace cable television: “No thanks—we find the big networks                But eMarketer defines it more by its purpose: rich media
give us all the market reach we’ll ever need!” Rich media ads allow          advertising uses motion (animated or video), sound and/or
marketers to engage audiences at an emotional level that once                interactivity to engage its audience. That engagement may simply
was the hallmark of television ads alone. The emotional impact of            be a better way to capture an individual’s attention for direct
rich media combined with the power of targeting gives marketers              response goals, or it may be a brand’s attempt to build mindshare
tools not available in any other medium.                                     or weave its way into the consumer’s heart.

                                                                             That’s a broad definition, but it’s one that reflects general market
For Direct Response Marketers
                                                                             perceptions. Some purists insist that simple Flash animations are
For direct response marketers, the superior click-through rates of
                                                                             not rich media, but if that measure were used, the majority of ads
rich media are impossible to ignore. But rich media is a bit like a
                                                                             now identified as rich media would no longer be identified that
rich dessert—at least as far as the consumer is concerned.
                                                                             way. Most publishers and advertising firms still count Flash ads as
Studies suggest that overexposure to a single ad reduces
                                                                             rich media.
effectiveness. The creative possibilities of rich media are many, but
use of the ads still requires attention to nuts and bolts issues like        Like any new medium, the nature of rich media is frequently
targeted placement and frequency capping.                                    debated by industry executives and observers. And while the
                                                                             industry is far from general agreement about what is or isn’t rich
For Web Publishers                                                           media, a common thread emerges: interactivity.
Rich media poses new challenges for many publishers.
                                                                             s Rich media ads are “interactive in nature,” says online
Advertising.com’s survey of interactive publishers, released in
                                                                               advertising firm DoubleClick.
February 2005, found that publishers expect rich media to have
the greatest impact on revenues this year, citing the ads ability to         s “It’s the interactivity,” says Advertising.com’s Mr. Ferber.
deliver the advertiser’s message. Nonetheless, publishers are
                                                                             s Ads that “allow users to view and interact with products and
concerned about the resources required to support the ads—and
                                                                               services,” says the Interactive Advertising Bureau,
streaming content in particular. Still, publishers who can offer rich
media placement and detailed audience data will be in a very                 s Rich media ads are “all about interactivity,” according to a
strong position.                                                               presentation by Zedo, a San Francisco Internet ad serving company,
                                                                               and LearningCraft, a Massachusetts online ad consultant.
For Ad Agencies
                                                                             The term “rich media” dates back to the early days of Web
Interactive ads with audio and video components offer an
                                                                             advertising, when motion and sound were rare. Perhaps some day
opportunity to flex creative muscles in ways that simply aren’t
                                                                             the industry will no longer refer to “rich media” but simply to
possible when working with flat image files. Setting aside the
                                                                             “advertising.” For now, however, “rich media” is the commonly
measurable benefits—both branding and direct response—of
                                                                             accepted term.
rich media ads, interactive campaigns are a chance to shine.
“Rich media brings back some of the pizzazz to the creative side
of Internet advertising,” says Scott Ferber, the co-founder and CEO
of Advertising.com.




    Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                         An eMarketer White Paper                                                               3
B. Broadband & the Rich
Media Audience
                                                                                       What makes the broadband audience attractive is not the high
The single most important factor supporting the                                        speed alone. First off, those individuals who connect via
                                                                                       broadband make up a sweet spot for marketers. Compared to
growth of rich media is the audience—more                                              dial-up users, “people in broadband households earn 27% more,
people are going online; they spend considerable                                       are online 52% more time, and spend more money when shopping
                                                                                       online ($80 more than dial-up users during the past three
time online and do more things there. More than
                                                                                       months),” as a Forrester Research analyst told MediaPost in
60% of US households are now online.                                                   August 2004.

                                                                                       And while broadband’s greater bandwidth opens up an avenue for
Online Households in the US, 2003-2008 (in millions
and as a % of total households*)                                                       larger (and therefore more complex) rich media ads, the pervasive
                                                                                       quality of broadband connections might be even more important.
2003                                                           64.1 (56.9%)            Always-on encourages individuals to dip in and out at will, much
2004                                               68.8 (60.0%)                        as they do with television or radio, making the Internet a much
2005                                                    71.5 (61.2%)                   more integral part of their overall media experience.
2006                                                      74.1 (62.3%)                 Besides broadband itself, the ready availability among consumers
2007                                                         78.0 (64.4%)              of desktop technology required for much of rich media advances
2008                                                            82.2 (66.7%)           the playing field. More than 98% of Internet-enabled computers
                                                                                       have a Flash player, according to NPD Research data for 2004, and
Note: *The Department of Commerce reported 112.6 million households in
the US in September 2003. eMarketer has based its total household                      more than 87% can handle Java.
projections on this figure
Source: eMarketer, February 2005                                                       The main players for streaming video and audio are not as widely
062970 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                                www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                       available, but still represent significant chunks of the market.
062970

And just as important, more households are accessing the
                                                                                       Rich Media Player Penetration in the US, 2004 (as a %
Internet using high-speed connections that make rich media ads                         of Internet-enabled computers)
palatable (even if not always welcome). Not even taking into
                                                                                       Macromedia Flash Player
account the near-universal penetration of broadband at work                                                                                           98.2%
(94% among those with Internet access at their desks according to
                                                                                       Java
comScore), there will be 60.4 million households with high-speed                                                                                      87.1%
connections by 2007—nearly half of all households in the US,
                                                                                       Adobe Acrobat Reader
whether online or not.
                                                                                                                                              78.2%

Broadband Households in the US, 2003-2008 (in                                          Apple QuickTime Player
millions and as a % of total households*)                                                                                         59.6%

                                                                                       RealOne Player
2003                           26.0 (23.1%)
                                                                                                                                  58.5%
2004                                     34.3 (29.9%)
                                                                                       Macromedia Shockwave Player
2005                                            42.3 (36.2%)                                                                  52.7%
2006                                                        51.1 (42.9%)               ViewPoint Media Player
2007                                                    60.4 (49.8%)                                                      49.6%

2008                                                            69.4 (56.3%)           Microsoft Windows Media Player
                                                                                                                      42.0%
Note: eMarketer uses the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as
its benchmark source for broadband households for 2003; *the                           SVG
Department of Commerce reported 112.6 million households in the US in
September 2003. eMarketer has based its total household projections on                            11.9%
this figure
Source: eMarketer, February 2005                                                       Source: NPD Group, December 2004; Macromedia, Inc., 2005
062972 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                                www.eMarketer.com          063936 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                        www.eMarketer.com

062972                                                                                 063936




      Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                                 An eMarketer White Paper                                                               4
C. Rich Media Ad Spending

To put rich media spending into greater                                         In absolute dollars, the overall US online ad growth translates to a
                                                                                record $9.5 billion in spending this year, according to eMarketer,
perspective, a quick look at the total US online ad                             rising rapidly to $17.6 billion by the end of 2008.
spending trends shows an overall increase of
                                                                                US Online Ad Spending, 2000-2008 (in billions)
30.7% in 2004. eMarketer projects growth of more
                                                                                2000                                     $8.1
than 20% this year, with healthy double-digit
                                                                                2001                                  $7.1
increases through 2008.
                                                                                2002                           $6.0

                                                                                2003                                  $7.3
Online Ad Spending Growth in the US, 2001-2008 (as a
% increase/decrease vs. prior year)                                             2004                                             $9.5

                                                                                2005                                                     $11.5
         -11.8%                2001
                                                                                2006                                                              $13.4
 -15.8%                        2002
                                                                                2007                                                                       $15.6
                               2003                        20.9%
                                                                                2008                                                                        $17.6
                               2004                                30.7%

                               2005                        21.1%                Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against
                                                                                the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB)/PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
                               2006                16.5%                        data, for which the last full year measured was 2003
                                                                                Source: eMarketer, January 2005
                               2007                16.4%                        062495 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                                     www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                062495
                               2008          12.8%
                                                                                Meanwhile, advertisers spent $808 million for rich media in 2004.
Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against
the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)         Rich media spending in the US will surpass $1 billion this year, and
data, for which the last full year measured was 2003                            then reach more than $2.2 billion by 2008. (See chart on the first
Source: eMarketer, January 2005
062496 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                          www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                page of this report.)
062496
                                                                                In fact, these estimates may be seen as conservative, since rich
Building from a small base in 2002, rich media advertising
                                                                                media usage has not yet hit any tipping point among traditional
expanded by a record 93.5% in 2003, according to the IAB/PwC
                                                                                brand marketers. Should that occur sooner than later, eMarketer
research that eMarketer uses to benchmark its projections.
                                                                                would need to increase these projections by at least 50%.
Growth was nearly 40% in 2004, and eMarketer projects that
spending on rich media will continue to grow by well more than                  Rich Media Ads as a Percent of Total Online Ad
20% annually through 2008.                                                      Impressions Served Worldwide, Q1 2002-Q3 2004

                                                                                Q1 2002                               17.3%
US Rich Media Ad Spending Growth, 2001-2008 (as a %
increase vs. prior year)                                                        Q2 2002                                  19.3%

2001      10.1%                                                                 Q3 2002                                          23.2%

2002                                                  69.9%                     Q4 2002                                            24.9%

2003                                                               93.5%        Q1 2003                                                  27.8%

2004*                              38.9%                                        Q2 2003                                                          31.7%

2005                            35.3%                                           Q3 2003                                                                   36.6%

2006                       28.8%                                                Q4 2003                                                               39.7%

2007                     27.5%                                                  Q1 2004                                                                     42.8%

2008                 22.6%                                                      Q2 2004                                                                     42.7%

Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against        Q3 2004                                                                     42.7%
the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)
data, for which the last quarter measured was Q4 2004; *as of 2004,             Source: DoubleClick, November 2004
interstitial ads included in rich media                                         053300 ©2003 eMarketer, Inc.                                     www.eMarketer.com
Source: eMarketer, March 2005
                                                                                053300
063874 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                          www.eMarketer.com
063874




      Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                          An eMarketer White Paper                                                                            5
C. Rich Media Ad Spending


Using the IAB/PwC’s overall data as a benchmark, eMarketer                       Branding and Direct Response
estimates 8.5% of 2004’s online ad spending went to rich media,                  Take away paid search, classifieds and e-mail from the US totals (and
and expects that figure to increase to a 12.5% share by 2008.                    negligible non-format spending of slotting fees and referrals) and
                                                                                 you’re left with the three core brand-oriented online ad formats:
Rich Media's Share of Total Online Ad Spending in the
US, 2000-2008                                                                    display advertising (which includes banners), rich media (which
                                                                                 includes interstitials) and sponsorships (which includes both).
2000          2.0%
                                                                                 These three formats make up the majority of ads on content sites
2001             2.5%
                                                                                 and portals and represent the advertising that brand marketers do
2002                            5.0%
                                                                                 online. And by breaking out rich media, display ads and
2003                                          8.0%                               sponsorships from the US totals—which are increasingly skewed
2004*                                            8.5%                            by the large sums spent on paid search—you get a clearer view of
2005                                                    9.5%                     rich media’s place in online brand advertising.

2006                                                           10.5%             Looking at 2004 alone, rich media is not a mere 8.5% of total online
2007                                                       11.5%                 ad spending, but 24.3% of online brand advertising spending. And
2008                                                              12.5%          when you consider that an uncalculated portion of sponsorships
                                                                                 is devoted to rich media ads, it’s likely that 2004’s true rich media
Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against
the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)          share edges up to the 30% range.
data, for which the last quarter measured was Q4 2004; *as of 2004,
interstitial ads included in rich media                                          The current rich media spending share of about 25% appears
Source: eMarketer, March 2005
063875 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                          www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                 closer to the estimates from companies like Unicast, Starcom IP
063875                                                                           and Eyeblaster. And by 2008, eMarketer projects that rich media
                                                                                 alone will make up over 34% of online brand advertising; again
                                                                                 factoring in sponsorships would make that figure higher.

                                                                                 US Online Ad Spending for Branding, by Format,
                                                                                 2000-2008 (as a % of total)
                                                                                          Display ads           Rich media*   Sponsorships          Total**
                                                                                                                                                 (in millions)
                                                                                 2000         57.9%                7.1%           35.1%             $6,539
                                                                                 2001         52.6%                8.1%           39.3%             $4,807
                                                                                 2002         51.9%                15.9%          32.2%             $3,398
                                                                                 2003         51.2%                24.4%          24.4%             $2,979
                                                                                 2004         51.4%                24.3%          24.3%             $3,276
                                                                                 2005         50.0%                25.7%          24.3%             $3,955
                                                                                 2006         46.5%                28.2%          25.4%             $4,722
                                                                                 2007         42.7%                30.7%          26.7%             $5,813
                                                                                 2008         39.5%                34.2%          26.3%             $6,650
                                                                                 Note: *rich media includes interstitials; **total refers to spending on just
                                                                                 the three formats shown
                                                                                 Source: eMarketer, October 2004
                                                                                 060944 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                               www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                 060944




      Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                           An eMarketer White Paper                                                                       6
C. Rich Media Ad Spending                                                  D. Measuring Rich Media
                                                                           Effectiveness
Branding Challenges
                                                                           The cost of creating and running rich media ads
Rich media projections by eMarketer raise some key                         make results measurement all the more
questions about the nature and use of rich media
advertising—is it fundamentally a tool for brand building,
                                                                           important. The basics begin with clicks. This is a
or one for direct response?                                                primitive user response, and limited in its
Advertising.com CEO Scott Ferber says the answer may                       meaning for the marketer, but the click does
be in the eye of the beholder. “Right now, it’s seen as a                  illustrate the greater engagement rich media
branding medium,” he says. And that makes a certain
                                                                           creates over static ads.
amount of sense, given the visceral impact of animation
and other special effects. “Movement conveys ‘essence,’
so it helps branding.”                                                     Click-Through Rates
                                                                           Rich media click-through rates have outperformed non-rich media
But the reality, says Mr. Ferber, is that rich media is a valuable         CTRs in every quarter. Click rates fell in 2003 but the declines
tool both for branding and direct response campaigns. “The                 halted in 2004. The decline in click rates in 2003 suggests that as
ability to capture information in an interactive environment               new ad formats grew more familiar to users, the ads were easier
is an incredible tool for direct response.”                                to ignore. Stabilizing rates in more recent quarters suggest that
With that broad utility, Mr. Ferber is looking for a new wave              new formats have proven compelling and that marketers have a
of advertisers to adopt rich media. Currently, use of rich                 better understanding of the need to cap ad frequency and to use
media tends to be focused on a handful of industries, he                   appropriate targeting.
says. “Broadly speaking—on the branding side, most rich                    The key in all of this is that rich media ads have stabilized and are
media ads are in the entertainment and automotive sectors,                 delivering a CTR five times higher than static display ads.
while on the direct response side the focus is on retail,
financial services, telecom and travel.”                                   Click-Through Rates for Rich Media, Non-Rich Media
                                                                           and Total Ads, Q1 2002-Q3 2004
Widespread broadband should change that. “I would hope                                          Rich media        Non-rich media            Total
to see the CPG companies coming more to the Internet to                    Q1 2002                  2.50%              0.41%                0.72%
raise brand awareness,” he says. But that’s just a start. He               Q2 2002                  2.48%              0.33%                0.69%
points to major marketers like restaurant chains and                       Q3 2002                  2.47%              0.27%                0.69%
technology companies, to name just two, that could benefit                 Q4 2002                  2.44%              0.27%                0.72%
from increased use of rich media to build brand online.                    Q1 2003                  2.15%              0.28%                0.70%
                                                                           Q2 2003                  1.87%              0.34%                0.61%
Use of rich media is still new enough that not all of the                  Q3 2003                  1.57%              0.29%                0.76%
wrinkles have been ironed out, he says. Advertising.com’s                  Q4 2003                  1.24%              0.27%                0.44%
network has a reach of roughly 125 million unique users,                   Q1 2004                  0.98%              0.25%                  –
but the entire network is not yet rich media enabled.                      Q2 2004                  1.17%              0.23%                  –
“Right now the figure stands at about 70%,” he says.                       Q3 2004                  1.17%              0.20%                  –
                                                                           Source: DoubleClick, November 2004
Meanwhile, the process can still be sticky. “There’s not                   058416 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                         www.eMarketer.com
one standard, no common language, for rich media. The                      058416
reach is there but some of the process is still being
worked out.”

The challenges, though, are easily outweighed by the
potential benefits—in particular the chance to interact
with customers. “The big issue is responsible marketing,”
he says. “You can overdo it with obnoxiously loud volume
or offensive graphics. But if we’re responsible as
marketers, there’s not much downside risk.”




    Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                       An eMarketer White Paper                                                                7
D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness



Frequency Capping                                                                  Again, the specific rich media format influences response rates.
Ad frequency makes a difference in the click rate. Data from                       While 28.8% of users interacted with floating ads during the first
Eyeblaster for the 14 months from January 2002 through February                    quarter of 2004, only about half that number interacted with rich
2003 indicate that while the average CTR was 5.99%, it peaked at                   media banners or expandable ads. Note, too, that DoubleClick
6.36% among users who had seen an ad two times, dropping off                       counts even the act of closing the ad window as a viable metric,
to 5.33% when users were exposed to an ad six or more times.                       since user perception of the ad takes place during that brief time.
                                                                                   Not every marketer might feel that way, however.
Logical enough—familiarity breeds, if not contempt, disinterest in
clicking. Therefore, if part of a marketer’s goals with a rich media-              Interaction* Rates with Rich Media Ads on
based ad campaign is the direct response of a click, make certain                  DoubleClick Network Worldwide, by Type of Ad, Q1
                                                                                   2004
to limit the frequency of ads that run on any single site.
                                                                                   Rich media banner                         15.5%
Click-Through Rate for Rich Media Ads Run on the
                                                                                   Rich media expandable                 14.0%
Eyeblaster Platform, by Ad Frequency, January 2002 -
February 2003                                                                      Rich media floating                                                  28.8%

1x                                                              6.00%              Average                                           18.4%

2x                                                                  6.36%          Note: *DoubleClick defines interaction as including "a mouse-over, a
                                                                                   pull-down, game playing, clicking to another layer of information, or closing
3x                                                              6.03%              the window in which the ad appears"
                                                                                   Source: DoubleClick, May 2004
4x                                                             5.93%               060965 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                              www.eMarketer.com

5x                                                            5.84%                060965


6x+                                                             5.33%

Note: Average click-through rate=5.99%; seven rich media ad formats
Source: Eyeblaster, April 2003
048856 ©2003 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
048856


Ad Formats
Ad format makes a difference for CTRs, according to Dynamic
Logic’s study of Eyeblaster-branded interstitials. The floating ad—
where the creative is not bound by a rectangular banner shape
and moves on top of the page content—had a 4.39% CTR
compared to 1.56% for a commercial break ad (a full-page unit
that plays on site entry or before a site page).

Click-Through Rate for Rich Media Interstitial Ads* for
Snuggle Botanical Bliss, by Creative Format, 2003

Floating ad                                                         4.39%

Commercial break               1.56%

  GIF banner        0.11%

Note: *the two types of Eyeblaster-branded rich media interstitials used
were a commercial break (a full-page ad that plays on site entry or before
any other site page) and a floating ad (moves within transparent layer over
Web page and plays within area up to 500x500 pixels)
Source: Eyeblaster/Dynamic Logic, April 2003
050030 ©2003 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
050030

DoubleClick also measures “interaction” rates, referring to user-
initiated events such as “a mouse-over, a pull-down, game playing,
clicking to another layer of information, or closing the window in
which the ad appears.”




      Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                             An eMarketer White Paper                                                                     8
D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness



                                                                    User Interaction Rates* and Average Brand
Playing With the Ads                                                Interaction Times** for Rich Media Ads Using
                                                                    PointRoll Technology, by Industry, August
Perhaps it goes without saying that the creative side of            2004-October 2004
any rich media ad plays a huge role in generating clicks                                           Interaction rate           Average brand
                                                                                                                             interaction time
and interaction. A recent campaign that generated strong                                                                       (in seconds)
response was Moxie Interactive’s work for Verizon                   Automotive                           17.9%                       9.9
Wireless’s new VCAST service offering streaming media to            Pharmaceutical                       12.0%                      12.8
wireless phones. Moxie developed floating ads with                  Consumer goods                        9.0%                      12.4
streaming video that allowed users to get a sense of the            Finance                               8.8%                       8.7
VCAST service.                                                      Retail                                8.6%                      11.7
                                                                    Technology                            8.6%                      15.2
“We wanted banners that people could play with,” says               Travel                                8.6%                       9.4
Moxie Vice President Joel Lunenfeld. “Our goal was to               Entertainment                         8.2%                      11.2
clearly shout that Verizon has this new service, and to             Telecommunications                    7.6%                      11.7
match the innovative service by putting it in people’s              Total                                 9.5%                      11.3
hands online and letting them play with it.”                        Note: interaction defined as "any time a unique user rolls over the ad unit
                                                                    to expand a panel"; *interaction rate defined as total interactions divided
The campaign was not easy to pull off, Mr. Lunenfeld says,          by total impressions; **average brand interaction time defined as
                                                                    "weighted average of total seconds that panels were displayed within an
because it needed clearance from the sites where the ads            individual impression"
                                                                    Source: PointRoll, November 2004
were to run. “We needed permission to run streaming
                                                                    061715 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
video uninitiated,” he says. (He suggests reaching out to           061715
media partners to reach agreements early in the process.)
                                                                    Indirect Response
But the campaign delivered significant results of interest          Beyond click-through and interaction time, indirect response is
to both brand and direct marketers. “Click-through rates            another key measure. DoubleClick found that consumers were more
were phenomenal,” he says, at over 3% during the first              likely to visit an advertiser’s Web site or purchase the company’s
week. Interaction times, meanwhile, were roughly 13                 product after viewing a rich-media ad than a non-rich media one.
seconds. (Moxie worked with Advertising.com using
PointRoll Technology on the campaign. See chart below               Post-impression activity per impression was 1.11% for rich media
for statistics from PointRoll on interaction times.)                in Q4 2003 versus 0.54% for non-rich media. And when tracked,
                                                                    each rich media activity created greater conversion to sales than
But beyond the interaction, Moxie saw gratifying message            did static display ads.
results as well. “We started off the campaign by doing
roadblocks, geo-targeted, frequency capping at one per              Consumer Post-Impression Reactions to Rich Media
user per day,” he says. “We saw 39.5% message                       vs. Non-Rich Media Online Ads, Q4 2003
association from the roadblocks alone.”                             Post-impression activity* per impression
                                                                                                         1.11%
                                                                                        0.54%

                                                                    Post-impression sales** per activity
                                                                                                                                           2.30%
                                                                                                                     1.47%

                                                                      Rich media                             Non-rich media
                                                                    Note: *any activity taken by a consumer subsequent to viewing an online
                                                                    ad but not clicking on it; includes visiting advertiser's Web site,
                                                                    downloading document or filling in form for more information;
                                                                    **conversion data here represents only DART for Advertisers data in which
                                                                    advertisers tracked conversions through Spotlight tags
                                                                    Source: DoubleClick, February 2004
                                                                    060941 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
                                                                    060941




    Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                An eMarketer White Paper                                                                       9
D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness


Data from Advertising.com supports the DoubleClick post-                           Brand Metrics for Rich Media Ads vs. GIF/JPG/HTML
impression activity results, showing rich media’s strength over                    Ads, Q2 2003 (as a % lift over unexposed group)
display advertising.                                                               Brand awareness
                                                                                                        7%
Take a recent week of activity on the Advertising.com network.
                                                                                                 5%
While only 11.67% of the total impressions were for rich media
                                                                                   Message association
ads, fully 22.71% of “actions” took place in response to such ads. In
                                                                                                                                                             31%
this case, actions are defined as “any post-click event, such as
                                                                                                                                 18%
lead acquisition or a user filling out a site registration.”
                                                                                   Brand favorability
                                                                                                    6%
Rich Media Ad's Share of Impressions, Clicks and
Actions* on Advertising.com Network, Week of                                                  4%
January 1, 2005-Week of March 12, 2005                                             Purchase intent
                                Impressions          Clicks        Actions                       5%
Week of January 1                   14.25%           21.55%         30.15%                    4%
Week of January 8                   13.64%           21.41%         23.67%
                                                                                     Rich media                             GIF/JPG/HTML
Week of January 15                  15.45%           22.52%         24.11%
                                                                                   Note: Dynamic Logic's MarketNorms database defines rich media as
Week of January 22                  16.34%           21.23%         24.38%         "including DHTML, Flash, rollover/expand, Superstitial, Eyeblaster, and
Week of January 29                  14.65%           19.56%         18.97%         Pointroll, [but] does not include video and audio"
                                                                                   Source: Dynamic Logic, 2004; DoubleClick, May 2004
Week of February 5                  13.36%           19.97%         15.80%
                                                                                   060964 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                               www.eMarketer.com
Week of February 12                 12.32%           19.06%         15.68%
                                                                                   060964
Week of February 19                 12.96%           24.92%         17.70%
Week of February 26                 13.69%           30.91%         18.74%         The Bottom Line
Week of March 5                     13.12%           27.62%         18.66%         For many advertisers, click rates, interaction measurements, and
Week of March 12                    11.67%           21.94%         22.71%         brand lift are secondary to the fundamental goal of customer
Note: *actions defined as any post-click event, such as lead acquisition or        acquisition. A poll of online retailers by the e-tailing group found that
user filling out a site registration
Source: Advertising.com, March 2003                                                customer acquisition was the most important marketing objective.
063910 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
063910                                                                             US Online Retailers' Rankings of Their Marketing
                                                                                   Objectives, 2004 (as a % of respondents)
Branding Effectiveness                                                                                        Very Impor- Some- Not      Not   Not
To measure the branding effectiveness of online advertising,                                                 impor- tant what very at all applicable
                                                                                                              tant        impor- impor- impor-
marketers typically employ the services of third-party companies                                                           tant   tant   tant
such as Dynamic Logic. Basing its research primarily on                            Customer acquisition       72%   21%    7%       0%        0%        1%
exposed/control consumer panels, Dynamic Logic has developed                       Convert browsers to 67%          26%    6%       1%        0%        1%
                                                                                   buyers
its MarketNorms database, as a benchmark to compare any
                                                                                   Customer retention         67%   25%    7%       1%        0%        1%
current campaign.
                                                                                   Drive traffic to site      49%   28%    20%      3%        0%        0%
Dynamic Logic has found that rich media ads generate increased                     Minimize shopping          33%   34%    22%      7%        2%        3%
                                                                                   cart abandonment
readings for branding metrics when compared to control group
                                                                                   Integrated multi-          26%   29%    22%      8%        5%       10%
figures. Message association showed the strongest lift. It is important            channel initiative
to note that these figures do not include audio or video ads.                      Reduce spam                10%   18%    30%      17%       8%       17%
                                                                                   Source: the e-tailing group, Exmplar, Inc., October 2004
                                                                                   062630 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                               www.eMarketer.com
                                                                                   062630




      Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                             An eMarketer White Paper                                                                    10
D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness                                        E. Obstacles—and Solutions

That’s the goal for Internet phone service provider Vonage. “We              Rich media is poised to become the dominant
are focused on customer acquisition at a good CPA,” or cost per
acquisition, says Caroline Finch, director of marketing.
                                                                             form of Web site advertising, but obstacles remain.

Vonage judges rich media online ads, including streaming video,              A key issue is cost, from both the marketer’s and the publisher’s
on that single goal. “We look at rich media as a way to increase             perspective. According to a JupiterResearch survey, more than a
awareness, educate consumers, and provide an enjoyable                       quarter of respondents cited cost as a reason for not buying
experience—but with the focus still on customer acquisition,”                online video advertising. (It should be noted that nearly as many
says Ms. Finch.                                                              cited unfamiliarity with the format.)

The success of an ad is simple, she says: track acquisitions based
                                                                             Reasons that US Marketers Give for Not Buying
on individual campaigns. “Some companies do look at other                    Online Video Advertising, 2004 (as a % of
metrics,” she says, “but we don’t. It’s primarily acquisitions at an         respondents)
acceptable CPA.”                                                             Audience is too small
                                                                                                                                                    38%

                                                                             Price is too high
                                                                                                                                    27%

                                                                             Too unfamiliar with the format
                                                                                                                      21%

                                                                             Publisher offerings aren't attractive enough
                                                                                                                   19%

                                                                             Poor picture quality
                                                                                                            14%

                                                                             Source: JupiterResearch, 2004; MediaPost, July 2004
                                                                             060959 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
                                                                             060959

                                                                             On the publishing side, Web sites are nervous about the costs
                                                                             associated with rich media, in particular streaming media. While
                                                                             70% of publishers support rich media ads, only 27% support
                                                                             streaming content.

                                                                             Types of Advertising Capabilities Supported by US
                                                                             Online Publishing Sites, December 2004 (as a % of
                                                                             respondents)

                                                                             Web banners                                                           87.2%

                                                                             Rich media                                                    69.2%

                                                                             Pop-ups and pop-unders                                60.3%

                                                                             Contextual advertising                      51.3%

                                                                             Streaming content 26.9%

                                                                                                     Behavioral targeting   24.4%

                                                                                 Other      3.8%

                                                                             Source: Advertising.com, February 2005
                                                                             062848 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc.                             www.eMarketer.com
                                                                             062848




    Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                         An eMarketer White Paper                                                                 11
E. Obstacles—and Solutions                                                     About this White Paper

The restrictions placed on certain formats by individual Web sites             Much of this white paper is based on research
may pose inventory challenges for advertisers looking for broad
reach. The promulgation of standards will help alleviate this issue.
                                                                               that originally appeared in the eMarketer
And the growth of rich media use will persuade more cautious                   spotlight report, “Rich Media: Techniques and
publishers to support it. In the meantime, advertising networks are
                                                                               Trends,” by Senior Analyst David Hallerman.
one option for advertisers seeking wider audiences.
                                                                               Additional reporting and writing for this paper
Cost issues will not disappear, but as with any technology, they will
decline over time as the use of rich media becomes more
                                                                               was done by Ezra Palmer.
common. And even now, on a cost per click basis rich media
seems to be worth its price.                                                   eMarketer Contact Information
                                                                               eMarketer, Inc.           Toll-Free: 800-405-0844
Certainly cost is an issue when considering streaming audio and
                                                                               75 Broad Street           Outside the US: 212-763-6010
video—tools that give marketers the ability to create the
                                                                               32nd floor                Fax: 212-763-6020
emotional impact of brand advertising on television and radio. One
                                                                               New York, NY 10004        E-Mail: sales@emarketer.com
route around this problem is repurposing content from other
media—but this must be done with an eye toward the
characteristics of the Internet.                                               Advertising.com Contact Information
                                                                               Advertising.com           Phone: 212-497-0085
“We can’t treat this like TV,” says Advertising.com’s Mr. Ferber. “If          Lauren Weinberg           HTTP://www.advertising.com
we just repurpose, we’re not making the most of the medium.”                   625 Broadway, 5th Floor   E-Mail:research@advertising.com
A campaign by Adidas made use of repurposed content—with a                     New York, NY 10012
twist. An Adidas TV spot featuring Muhammad Ali “boxing” with his
daughter was downloaded more than 2.5 million times. The twist:
The knockout wasn’t included in the TV part of the campaign, and
could only be accessed online.

Meanwhile, interactive streaming media advertising is still, at this
point, not very common. But the success stories, like the Jerry
Seinfeld-Superman Webisodes for American Express and Burger
King’s Subservient Chicken site, point up the marketing possibilities.

Inventiveness like this is at the heart of successful rich media
spots. At WSJ.com, the highest impact unit is a “sliding brand
launch unit,” which briefly expands over editorial real estate
before sliding back into its designated ad position.

As WSJ.com’s Mr. Henry puts it: “We think better advertising is
better for everyone, from clients to readers.”




     Rich Media: At The Tipping Point                          An eMarketer White Paper                                                 12

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Marketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-box
Marketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-boxMarketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-box
Marketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-boxMathilde Lenoir
 
Digital Marketing for Beer & Wine Distributors
Digital Marketing for Beer & Wine DistributorsDigital Marketing for Beer & Wine Distributors
Digital Marketing for Beer & Wine DistributorsDave Knox
 
Brand advertising and digital
Brand advertising and digitalBrand advertising and digital
Brand advertising and digitalWebAnalytika
 
"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper
"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper
"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Papercomms planning
 
The evolution of client-agency relationships
The evolution of client-agency relationshipsThe evolution of client-agency relationships
The evolution of client-agency relationshipsMark Linder
 
Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]
Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]
Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]interlinkONE
 
Mobile social synergy 2012
Mobile social synergy 2012 Mobile social synergy 2012
Mobile social synergy 2012 Sharyl Dobos
 
Four forces reshaping the digital advertising landscape
Four forces reshaping the digital advertising landscapeFour forces reshaping the digital advertising landscape
Four forces reshaping the digital advertising landscapePwC España
 
Primir 090308
Primir 090308Primir 090308
Primir 090308BosRick
 
Integrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channels
Integrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channelsIntegrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channels
Integrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channelsIntelligencia Limited
 
The New Emerging Trend In Social Media
The New Emerging Trend In Social MediaThe New Emerging Trend In Social Media
The New Emerging Trend In Social MediaLim Kang Ning
 
When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...
When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...
When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...Laura Morales
 
Six Emerging Media Trends
Six Emerging Media TrendsSix Emerging Media Trends
Six Emerging Media TrendsGreg Verdino
 
The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media April 2017
The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media  April 2017The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media  April 2017
The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media April 2017Tom Collinger
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Marketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-box
Marketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-boxMarketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-box
Marketingcharts powerpoint-the-marketing-data-box
 
Digital Marketing for Beer & Wine Distributors
Digital Marketing for Beer & Wine DistributorsDigital Marketing for Beer & Wine Distributors
Digital Marketing for Beer & Wine Distributors
 
Brand advertising and digital
Brand advertising and digitalBrand advertising and digital
Brand advertising and digital
 
"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper
"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper
"Brand advertising and digital" an IAB Europe - White Paper
 
The evolution of client-agency relationships
The evolution of client-agency relationshipsThe evolution of client-agency relationships
The evolution of client-agency relationships
 
Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]
Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]
Wide Format Printers: A Hidden Profit Pool [Global Channel Partners Summit]
 
ia_white_paper
ia_white_paperia_white_paper
ia_white_paper
 
Mobile social synergy 2012
Mobile social synergy 2012 Mobile social synergy 2012
Mobile social synergy 2012
 
Four forces reshaping the digital advertising landscape
Four forces reshaping the digital advertising landscapeFour forces reshaping the digital advertising landscape
Four forces reshaping the digital advertising landscape
 
Primir 090308
Primir 090308Primir 090308
Primir 090308
 
Integrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channels
Integrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channelsIntegrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channels
Integrating social media with mobile, online and other marketing channels
 
The New Emerging Trend In Social Media
The New Emerging Trend In Social MediaThe New Emerging Trend In Social Media
The New Emerging Trend In Social Media
 
Emerging Media
Emerging MediaEmerging Media
Emerging Media
 
MR MRP302 PROJECT
MR MRP302 PROJECTMR MRP302 PROJECT
MR MRP302 PROJECT
 
Viphone Final
Viphone FinalViphone Final
Viphone Final
 
When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...
When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...
When the money moves to digital, where should it go? ComScore Study: Media Pl...
 
Six Emerging Media Trends
Six Emerging Media TrendsSix Emerging Media Trends
Six Emerging Media Trends
 
Shazam x NBCU
Shazam x NBCUShazam x NBCU
Shazam x NBCU
 
Can Media Firms Become Digital Video Mavens?
Can Media Firms Become Digital Video Mavens?Can Media Firms Become Digital Video Mavens?
Can Media Firms Become Digital Video Mavens?
 
The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media April 2017
The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media  April 2017The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media  April 2017
The Impact of Owned vs. Paid media April 2017
 

Andere mochten auch

Mit Annual Conference 2009 Presentation
Mit Annual Conference 2009 PresentationMit Annual Conference 2009 Presentation
Mit Annual Conference 2009 Presentationleilac
 
Double click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertising
Double click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertisingDouble click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertising
Double click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertisingIlias Louis Hatzis
 
IoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architecture
IoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architectureIoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architecture
IoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architecturePaul Fremantle
 

Andere mochten auch (8)

Ad words and your clients
Ad words and your clientsAd words and your clients
Ad words and your clients
 
Social Gifting
Social Gifting Social Gifting
Social Gifting
 
Mit Annual Conference 2009 Presentation
Mit Annual Conference 2009 PresentationMit Annual Conference 2009 Presentation
Mit Annual Conference 2009 Presentation
 
Mobiguide
MobiguideMobiguide
Mobiguide
 
Double click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertising
Double click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertisingDouble click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertising
Double click 04-2005-the-decade-in-online-advertising
 
Social Gifting
Social GiftingSocial Gifting
Social Gifting
 
Retailmediastudy
RetailmediastudyRetailmediastudy
Retailmediastudy
 
IoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architecture
IoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architectureIoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architecture
IoT World - creating a secure robust IoT reference architecture
 

Ähnlich wie Rich media spending

Informe Ibm End of Advertisement as we know it
Informe Ibm End of Advertisement as we know itInforme Ibm End of Advertisement as we know it
Informe Ibm End of Advertisement as we know itGonzalo Martín
 
T Viral Istanbul 21112006
T Viral Istanbul 21112006T Viral Istanbul 21112006
T Viral Istanbul 21112006Casper Moller
 
Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)
Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)
Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)Jon Egley
 
Media Ibv Advertisingv2
Media Ibv Advertisingv2Media Ibv Advertisingv2
Media Ibv Advertisingv2gojipcap
 
Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]
Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]
Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]Engel Fonseca
 
The end of advertising as we know it
The end of advertising as we know itThe end of advertising as we know it
The end of advertising as we know itinnovActing
 
The End Of Advertising By IBM
The End Of Advertising By IBMThe End Of Advertising By IBM
The End Of Advertising By IBMBrian Tiong
 
Today's Media Planning and Buying Landscape
Today's Media Planning and Buying LandscapeToday's Media Planning and Buying Landscape
Today's Media Planning and Buying LandscapeRenoTahoeAMA
 
Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media Companies
Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media CompaniesChallenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media Companies
Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media CompaniesJose Claudio Terra
 
A look at client-agency relationships.
A look at client-agency relationships. A look at client-agency relationships.
A look at client-agency relationships. Mark Linder
 
Social Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital Signage
Social Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital SignageSocial Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital Signage
Social Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital SignageLynne d Johnson
 
The 4 fundamentals of iDirect Marketing
The 4 fundamentals of iDirect MarketingThe 4 fundamentals of iDirect Marketing
The 4 fundamentals of iDirect MarketingTim Suther
 
Airline advertising - A promising media
Airline advertising - A promising mediaAirline advertising - A promising media
Airline advertising - A promising mediaBlue Mushroom
 
High Performance Marketing & Advertising
High Performance Marketing & AdvertisingHigh Performance Marketing & Advertising
High Performance Marketing & AdvertisingAcxiom Corporation
 
12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)
12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)
12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)The Open Room
 
Neustar marketing fact pack 2019
Neustar marketing fact pack 2019Neustar marketing fact pack 2019
Neustar marketing fact pack 2019Mr Nyak
 
7 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 2017
7 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 20177 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 2017
7 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 2017iQ Media
 
Digital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year Report
Digital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year ReportDigital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year Report
Digital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year ReportJomer Gregorio
 
The End of Advertising As We Know It
The End of Advertising As We Know It   The End of Advertising As We Know It
The End of Advertising As We Know It Ishraq Dhaly
 
IBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know it
IBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know itIBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know it
IBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know itWho Let The Dogs Out
 

Ähnlich wie Rich media spending (20)

Informe Ibm End of Advertisement as we know it
Informe Ibm End of Advertisement as we know itInforme Ibm End of Advertisement as we know it
Informe Ibm End of Advertisement as we know it
 
T Viral Istanbul 21112006
T Viral Istanbul 21112006T Viral Istanbul 21112006
T Viral Istanbul 21112006
 
Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)
Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)
Emcc jan 2012 vers 1 (1)
 
Media Ibv Advertisingv2
Media Ibv Advertisingv2Media Ibv Advertisingv2
Media Ibv Advertisingv2
 
Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]
Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]
Ibm The End Media Ibv Advertisingv2[1]
 
The end of advertising as we know it
The end of advertising as we know itThe end of advertising as we know it
The end of advertising as we know it
 
The End Of Advertising By IBM
The End Of Advertising By IBMThe End Of Advertising By IBM
The End Of Advertising By IBM
 
Today's Media Planning and Buying Landscape
Today's Media Planning and Buying LandscapeToday's Media Planning and Buying Landscape
Today's Media Planning and Buying Landscape
 
Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media Companies
Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media CompaniesChallenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media Companies
Challenges and Opportunities in the Internet for Media Companies
 
A look at client-agency relationships.
A look at client-agency relationships. A look at client-agency relationships.
A look at client-agency relationships.
 
Social Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital Signage
Social Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital SignageSocial Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital Signage
Social Media Opportunities and Challenges in Digital Signage
 
The 4 fundamentals of iDirect Marketing
The 4 fundamentals of iDirect MarketingThe 4 fundamentals of iDirect Marketing
The 4 fundamentals of iDirect Marketing
 
Airline advertising - A promising media
Airline advertising - A promising mediaAirline advertising - A promising media
Airline advertising - A promising media
 
High Performance Marketing & Advertising
High Performance Marketing & AdvertisingHigh Performance Marketing & Advertising
High Performance Marketing & Advertising
 
12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)
12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)
12 Tenets of DigiMarketing (OgilvyOne)
 
Neustar marketing fact pack 2019
Neustar marketing fact pack 2019Neustar marketing fact pack 2019
Neustar marketing fact pack 2019
 
7 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 2017
7 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 20177 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 2017
7 Ways Brands Will Transform TV and Media Strategies in 2017
 
Digital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year Report
Digital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year ReportDigital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year Report
Digital Advertising Trends 2021 – Mid-Year Report
 
The End of Advertising As We Know It
The End of Advertising As We Know It   The End of Advertising As We Know It
The End of Advertising As We Know It
 
IBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know it
IBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know itIBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know it
IBM Ad Study: The end of advertising as we know it
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Durg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTS
Durg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTSDurg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTS
Durg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTSkajalroy875762
 
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024Marel
 
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur DubaiUAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubaijaehdlyzca
 
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1kcpayne
 
Falcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business Growth
Falcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business GrowthFalcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business Growth
Falcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business GrowthFalcon investment
 
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book nowKalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book nowranineha57744
 
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with CultureOrganizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with CultureSeta Wicaksana
 
Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...
Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...
Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...meghakumariji156
 
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration PresentationUneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentationuneakwhite
 
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGBerhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGpr788182
 
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableNashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Availablepr788182
 
Jual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan CytotecJual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan CytotecZurliaSoop
 
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptxQSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptxDitasDelaCruz
 
JAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR ESCORTS
JAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR  ESCORTSJAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR  ESCORTS
JAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR ESCORTSkajalroy875762
 
joint cost.pptx COST ACCOUNTING Sixteenth Edition ...
joint cost.pptx  COST ACCOUNTING  Sixteenth Edition                          ...joint cost.pptx  COST ACCOUNTING  Sixteenth Edition                          ...
joint cost.pptx COST ACCOUNTING Sixteenth Edition ...NadhimTaha
 
New 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck Template
New 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck TemplateNew 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck Template
New 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck TemplateCannaBusinessPlans
 
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGParadip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGpr788182
 
Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...
Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...
Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...ssuserf63bd7
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Durg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTS
Durg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTSDurg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTS
Durg CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN durg ESCORTS
 
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
 
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur DubaiUAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
UAE Bur Dubai Call Girls ☏ 0564401582 Call Girl in Bur Dubai
 
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
Katrina Personal Brand Project and portfolio 1
 
Falcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business Growth
Falcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business GrowthFalcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business Growth
Falcon Invoice Discounting: Empowering Your Business Growth
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf buy Old Gmail Accounts
 
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book nowKalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
Kalyan Call Girl 98350*37198 Call Girls in Escort service book now
 
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with CultureOrganizational Transformation Lead with Culture
Organizational Transformation Lead with Culture
 
HomeRoots Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
HomeRoots Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024HomeRoots Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
HomeRoots Pitch Deck | Investor Insights | April 2024
 
Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...
Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...
Escorts in Nungambakkam Phone 8250092165 Enjoy 24/7 Escort Service Enjoy Your...
 
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration PresentationUneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
Uneak White's Personal Brand Exploration Presentation
 
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGBerhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Berhampur 70918*19311 CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
 
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableNashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Nashik Call Girl Just Call 7091819311 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Jual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan CytotecJual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
Jual Obat Aborsi ( Asli No.1 ) 085657271886 Obat Penggugur Kandungan Cytotec
 
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptxQSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
QSM Chap 10 Service Culture in Tourism and Hospitality Industry.pptx
 
JAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR ESCORTS
JAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR  ESCORTSJAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR  ESCORTS
JAJPUR CALL GIRL ❤ 82729*64427❤ CALL GIRLS IN JAJPUR ESCORTS
 
joint cost.pptx COST ACCOUNTING Sixteenth Edition ...
joint cost.pptx  COST ACCOUNTING  Sixteenth Edition                          ...joint cost.pptx  COST ACCOUNTING  Sixteenth Edition                          ...
joint cost.pptx COST ACCOUNTING Sixteenth Edition ...
 
New 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck Template
New 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck TemplateNew 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck Template
New 2024 Cannabis Edibles Investor Pitch Deck Template
 
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDINGParadip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
Paradip CALL GIRL❤7091819311❤CALL GIRLS IN ESCORT SERVICE WE ARE PROVIDING
 
Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...
Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...
Horngren’s Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis, Canadian 9th edition soluti...
 

Rich media spending

  • 1. May 2005 White Paper Rich Media: At The Tipping Point Sponsored by Impetus: The US Internet quietly passed an important milestone late last year, as the number of broadband users surpassed dial-up users for the first time. More than one-third of all US households will be broadband-enabled by the end of 2005. Spurred by the wide availability of broadband, the use of rich media in advertising will grow sharply over the next five years. The wider prominence of rich media and the strong response rate to rich media ads will stimulate new creative activity—and that creativity could well lead to even more interest in rich media ads among advertisers and ad agencies. 063872 US Rich Media Ad Spending, 2000-2008 (in millions) Overview The mass broadband audience has arrived. The shift to fast 2000 $161 connection in the home and the office has created a substantial 2001 $177 audience for marketers employing rich media advertising. Rich 2002 $301 media advertising totaled roughly $800 million in 2004, 2003 $581 accounting for less than 10% of all online advertising. eMarketer 2004* $808 expects the category to register gains of more than 25% through 2007, and spending as a whole will reach $2.2 billion by 2008. 2005 $1,093 Growth will come not only in absolute numbers but also as a 2006 $1,407 share of the overall market, as traditional advertisers look to rich 2007 $1,794 media for branding opportunities. But there are obstacles to 2008 $2,200 overcome. Click-through rates are strong, but Internet users Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against could become disaffected if they are bombarded with boring, the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) irrelevant or repetitive ads. Targeting and frequency capping will data, for which the last quarter measured was Q4 2004; *as of 2004, interstitial ads included in rich media be critical for both direct and brand marketing efforts, and, Source: eMarketer, March 2005 perhaps more so with rich media than with other types of online 063872 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com advertising, strong creative work will be crucial. Issues & Questions s What rich media standards are emerging? s What are the best ways to measure rich media results? s Which formats work best—and when? s Which strategies are capturing consumer attention? The First Place to Look
  • 2. Advertising.com Welcome Letter The eMarketer Outlook Dear Marketer, The use of audio, video, animation, and It moves, it speaks, it engages and captures the attention of an interactivity has been a siren song for advertisers audience like virtually no other online advertising format. It’s called rich media advertising - and with the approaching demise since the emergence of the Internet. The first of dialup, it’s here to stay. generation of animated ads showed both the Sponsored by Advertising.com, this report explores the promise and peril of the new medium – “Look! It increasingly influential role rich media advertising is playing in the moves!” followed by “Oh, no! It crashed my new broadband-dominant world of Internet advertising. Using motion (animated or video), sound and interactivity, rich media browser!” Then came abuse and overuse—the advertising offers important advantages for advertisers with ubiquitous “blink,” the endless loop, the audio file diverse goals. For brand marketers, it allows advertisements to that played without permission. Web publishers engage audiences at an emotional level once reserved for television. For direct response marketers, it offers click-through moved to clamp down on these early forms of rates as much as five times higher than static display ads. These rich media, and for years many publishers viewed factors, the new predominance of high-speed Internet access, and the simple fact that sixty percent of American households are rich media ads with suspicion. now online are all contributing to double-digit growth in rich media The landscape has changed, and widespread broadband Internet ad spending. access has been a key. Web sites, once dubious about the format, This report is critical reading for virtually anyone with a stake in the now welcome rich media advertising. Indeed, DoubleClick says future of online advertising. The data captured here are fascinating that some 43% of the ads it serves are rich media. But the growth and sometimes staggering, and although technological and phase is far from over: Mike Henry, director of advertising sales for financial hurdles will make the road ahead rocky for some in our The Wall Street Journal Online, estimates that rich media ads on industry, the statistics clearly support one conclusion. In the WSJ.com jumped by 60% in 2004, with more increases expected coming months and years, rich media advertising will increasingly this year. influence how advertisers and agencies approach online The increased use of rich media for advertising will likewise increase marketing, how publishers compete for advertising revenue, and attention on measurement. Brand marketers can’t spend significant how we all experience the Internet. dollars without getting clear usage reports. But eMarketer expects measurement to become more accurate as the category grows, in part because control-group benchmarks will be more reliable. Sincerely, Similarly, measurement should become easier because reporting will become built into the buy, rather than added as an afterthought. Scott Ferber CEO Advertising.com Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 2
  • 3. Implications for Your Business A. Defining Rich Media For Brand Marketers Before looking at the rich media marketplace, The growth of broadband, the expanding universe of Internet it’s important to understand what “rich media” users, and the widening array of available rich media formats and technologies mean that brand marketers can no longer overlook means. Some define rich media by technology, online advertising. Brand marketers not advertising on the Internet some by content. today are like their counterparts 10 years ago who failed to embrace cable television: “No thanks—we find the big networks But eMarketer defines it more by its purpose: rich media give us all the market reach we’ll ever need!” Rich media ads allow advertising uses motion (animated or video), sound and/or marketers to engage audiences at an emotional level that once interactivity to engage its audience. That engagement may simply was the hallmark of television ads alone. The emotional impact of be a better way to capture an individual’s attention for direct rich media combined with the power of targeting gives marketers response goals, or it may be a brand’s attempt to build mindshare tools not available in any other medium. or weave its way into the consumer’s heart. That’s a broad definition, but it’s one that reflects general market For Direct Response Marketers perceptions. Some purists insist that simple Flash animations are For direct response marketers, the superior click-through rates of not rich media, but if that measure were used, the majority of ads rich media are impossible to ignore. But rich media is a bit like a now identified as rich media would no longer be identified that rich dessert—at least as far as the consumer is concerned. way. Most publishers and advertising firms still count Flash ads as Studies suggest that overexposure to a single ad reduces rich media. effectiveness. The creative possibilities of rich media are many, but use of the ads still requires attention to nuts and bolts issues like Like any new medium, the nature of rich media is frequently targeted placement and frequency capping. debated by industry executives and observers. And while the industry is far from general agreement about what is or isn’t rich For Web Publishers media, a common thread emerges: interactivity. Rich media poses new challenges for many publishers. s Rich media ads are “interactive in nature,” says online Advertising.com’s survey of interactive publishers, released in advertising firm DoubleClick. February 2005, found that publishers expect rich media to have the greatest impact on revenues this year, citing the ads ability to s “It’s the interactivity,” says Advertising.com’s Mr. Ferber. deliver the advertiser’s message. Nonetheless, publishers are s Ads that “allow users to view and interact with products and concerned about the resources required to support the ads—and services,” says the Interactive Advertising Bureau, streaming content in particular. Still, publishers who can offer rich media placement and detailed audience data will be in a very s Rich media ads are “all about interactivity,” according to a strong position. presentation by Zedo, a San Francisco Internet ad serving company, and LearningCraft, a Massachusetts online ad consultant. For Ad Agencies The term “rich media” dates back to the early days of Web Interactive ads with audio and video components offer an advertising, when motion and sound were rare. Perhaps some day opportunity to flex creative muscles in ways that simply aren’t the industry will no longer refer to “rich media” but simply to possible when working with flat image files. Setting aside the “advertising.” For now, however, “rich media” is the commonly measurable benefits—both branding and direct response—of accepted term. rich media ads, interactive campaigns are a chance to shine. “Rich media brings back some of the pizzazz to the creative side of Internet advertising,” says Scott Ferber, the co-founder and CEO of Advertising.com. Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 3
  • 4. B. Broadband & the Rich Media Audience What makes the broadband audience attractive is not the high The single most important factor supporting the speed alone. First off, those individuals who connect via broadband make up a sweet spot for marketers. Compared to growth of rich media is the audience—more dial-up users, “people in broadband households earn 27% more, people are going online; they spend considerable are online 52% more time, and spend more money when shopping online ($80 more than dial-up users during the past three time online and do more things there. More than months),” as a Forrester Research analyst told MediaPost in 60% of US households are now online. August 2004. And while broadband’s greater bandwidth opens up an avenue for Online Households in the US, 2003-2008 (in millions and as a % of total households*) larger (and therefore more complex) rich media ads, the pervasive quality of broadband connections might be even more important. 2003 64.1 (56.9%) Always-on encourages individuals to dip in and out at will, much 2004 68.8 (60.0%) as they do with television or radio, making the Internet a much 2005 71.5 (61.2%) more integral part of their overall media experience. 2006 74.1 (62.3%) Besides broadband itself, the ready availability among consumers 2007 78.0 (64.4%) of desktop technology required for much of rich media advances 2008 82.2 (66.7%) the playing field. More than 98% of Internet-enabled computers have a Flash player, according to NPD Research data for 2004, and Note: *The Department of Commerce reported 112.6 million households in the US in September 2003. eMarketer has based its total household more than 87% can handle Java. projections on this figure Source: eMarketer, February 2005 The main players for streaming video and audio are not as widely 062970 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com available, but still represent significant chunks of the market. 062970 And just as important, more households are accessing the Rich Media Player Penetration in the US, 2004 (as a % Internet using high-speed connections that make rich media ads of Internet-enabled computers) palatable (even if not always welcome). Not even taking into Macromedia Flash Player account the near-universal penetration of broadband at work 98.2% (94% among those with Internet access at their desks according to Java comScore), there will be 60.4 million households with high-speed 87.1% connections by 2007—nearly half of all households in the US, Adobe Acrobat Reader whether online or not. 78.2% Broadband Households in the US, 2003-2008 (in Apple QuickTime Player millions and as a % of total households*) 59.6% RealOne Player 2003 26.0 (23.1%) 58.5% 2004 34.3 (29.9%) Macromedia Shockwave Player 2005 42.3 (36.2%) 52.7% 2006 51.1 (42.9%) ViewPoint Media Player 2007 60.4 (49.8%) 49.6% 2008 69.4 (56.3%) Microsoft Windows Media Player 42.0% Note: eMarketer uses the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as its benchmark source for broadband households for 2003; *the SVG Department of Commerce reported 112.6 million households in the US in September 2003. eMarketer has based its total household projections on 11.9% this figure Source: eMarketer, February 2005 Source: NPD Group, December 2004; Macromedia, Inc., 2005 062972 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 063936 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 062972 063936 Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 4
  • 5. C. Rich Media Ad Spending To put rich media spending into greater In absolute dollars, the overall US online ad growth translates to a record $9.5 billion in spending this year, according to eMarketer, perspective, a quick look at the total US online ad rising rapidly to $17.6 billion by the end of 2008. spending trends shows an overall increase of US Online Ad Spending, 2000-2008 (in billions) 30.7% in 2004. eMarketer projects growth of more 2000 $8.1 than 20% this year, with healthy double-digit 2001 $7.1 increases through 2008. 2002 $6.0 2003 $7.3 Online Ad Spending Growth in the US, 2001-2008 (as a % increase/decrease vs. prior year) 2004 $9.5 2005 $11.5 -11.8% 2001 2006 $13.4 -15.8% 2002 2007 $15.6 2003 20.9% 2008 $17.6 2004 30.7% 2005 21.1% Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB)/PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) 2006 16.5% data, for which the last full year measured was 2003 Source: eMarketer, January 2005 2007 16.4% 062495 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 062495 2008 12.8% Meanwhile, advertisers spent $808 million for rich media in 2004. Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Rich media spending in the US will surpass $1 billion this year, and data, for which the last full year measured was 2003 then reach more than $2.2 billion by 2008. (See chart on the first Source: eMarketer, January 2005 062496 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com page of this report.) 062496 In fact, these estimates may be seen as conservative, since rich Building from a small base in 2002, rich media advertising media usage has not yet hit any tipping point among traditional expanded by a record 93.5% in 2003, according to the IAB/PwC brand marketers. Should that occur sooner than later, eMarketer research that eMarketer uses to benchmark its projections. would need to increase these projections by at least 50%. Growth was nearly 40% in 2004, and eMarketer projects that spending on rich media will continue to grow by well more than Rich Media Ads as a Percent of Total Online Ad 20% annually through 2008. Impressions Served Worldwide, Q1 2002-Q3 2004 Q1 2002 17.3% US Rich Media Ad Spending Growth, 2001-2008 (as a % increase vs. prior year) Q2 2002 19.3% 2001 10.1% Q3 2002 23.2% 2002 69.9% Q4 2002 24.9% 2003 93.5% Q1 2003 27.8% 2004* 38.9% Q2 2003 31.7% 2005 35.3% Q3 2003 36.6% 2006 28.8% Q4 2003 39.7% 2007 27.5% Q1 2004 42.8% 2008 22.6% Q2 2004 42.7% Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against Q3 2004 42.7% the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) data, for which the last quarter measured was Q4 2004; *as of 2004, Source: DoubleClick, November 2004 interstitial ads included in rich media 053300 ©2003 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com Source: eMarketer, March 2005 053300 063874 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 063874 Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 5
  • 6. C. Rich Media Ad Spending Using the IAB/PwC’s overall data as a benchmark, eMarketer Branding and Direct Response estimates 8.5% of 2004’s online ad spending went to rich media, Take away paid search, classifieds and e-mail from the US totals (and and expects that figure to increase to a 12.5% share by 2008. negligible non-format spending of slotting fees and referrals) and you’re left with the three core brand-oriented online ad formats: Rich Media's Share of Total Online Ad Spending in the US, 2000-2008 display advertising (which includes banners), rich media (which includes interstitials) and sponsorships (which includes both). 2000 2.0% These three formats make up the majority of ads on content sites 2001 2.5% and portals and represent the advertising that brand marketers do 2002 5.0% online. And by breaking out rich media, display ads and 2003 8.0% sponsorships from the US totals—which are increasingly skewed 2004* 8.5% by the large sums spent on paid search—you get a clearer view of 2005 9.5% rich media’s place in online brand advertising. 2006 10.5% Looking at 2004 alone, rich media is not a mere 8.5% of total online 2007 11.5% ad spending, but 24.3% of online brand advertising spending. And 2008 12.5% when you consider that an uncalculated portion of sponsorships is devoted to rich media ads, it’s likely that 2004’s true rich media Note: eMarketer benchmarks its US online ad spending projections against the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) - PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) share edges up to the 30% range. data, for which the last quarter measured was Q4 2004; *as of 2004, interstitial ads included in rich media The current rich media spending share of about 25% appears Source: eMarketer, March 2005 063875 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com closer to the estimates from companies like Unicast, Starcom IP 063875 and Eyeblaster. And by 2008, eMarketer projects that rich media alone will make up over 34% of online brand advertising; again factoring in sponsorships would make that figure higher. US Online Ad Spending for Branding, by Format, 2000-2008 (as a % of total) Display ads Rich media* Sponsorships Total** (in millions) 2000 57.9% 7.1% 35.1% $6,539 2001 52.6% 8.1% 39.3% $4,807 2002 51.9% 15.9% 32.2% $3,398 2003 51.2% 24.4% 24.4% $2,979 2004 51.4% 24.3% 24.3% $3,276 2005 50.0% 25.7% 24.3% $3,955 2006 46.5% 28.2% 25.4% $4,722 2007 42.7% 30.7% 26.7% $5,813 2008 39.5% 34.2% 26.3% $6,650 Note: *rich media includes interstitials; **total refers to spending on just the three formats shown Source: eMarketer, October 2004 060944 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 060944 Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 6
  • 7. C. Rich Media Ad Spending D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness Branding Challenges The cost of creating and running rich media ads Rich media projections by eMarketer raise some key make results measurement all the more questions about the nature and use of rich media advertising—is it fundamentally a tool for brand building, important. The basics begin with clicks. This is a or one for direct response? primitive user response, and limited in its Advertising.com CEO Scott Ferber says the answer may meaning for the marketer, but the click does be in the eye of the beholder. “Right now, it’s seen as a illustrate the greater engagement rich media branding medium,” he says. And that makes a certain creates over static ads. amount of sense, given the visceral impact of animation and other special effects. “Movement conveys ‘essence,’ so it helps branding.” Click-Through Rates Rich media click-through rates have outperformed non-rich media But the reality, says Mr. Ferber, is that rich media is a valuable CTRs in every quarter. Click rates fell in 2003 but the declines tool both for branding and direct response campaigns. “The halted in 2004. The decline in click rates in 2003 suggests that as ability to capture information in an interactive environment new ad formats grew more familiar to users, the ads were easier is an incredible tool for direct response.” to ignore. Stabilizing rates in more recent quarters suggest that With that broad utility, Mr. Ferber is looking for a new wave new formats have proven compelling and that marketers have a of advertisers to adopt rich media. Currently, use of rich better understanding of the need to cap ad frequency and to use media tends to be focused on a handful of industries, he appropriate targeting. says. “Broadly speaking—on the branding side, most rich The key in all of this is that rich media ads have stabilized and are media ads are in the entertainment and automotive sectors, delivering a CTR five times higher than static display ads. while on the direct response side the focus is on retail, financial services, telecom and travel.” Click-Through Rates for Rich Media, Non-Rich Media and Total Ads, Q1 2002-Q3 2004 Widespread broadband should change that. “I would hope Rich media Non-rich media Total to see the CPG companies coming more to the Internet to Q1 2002 2.50% 0.41% 0.72% raise brand awareness,” he says. But that’s just a start. He Q2 2002 2.48% 0.33% 0.69% points to major marketers like restaurant chains and Q3 2002 2.47% 0.27% 0.69% technology companies, to name just two, that could benefit Q4 2002 2.44% 0.27% 0.72% from increased use of rich media to build brand online. Q1 2003 2.15% 0.28% 0.70% Q2 2003 1.87% 0.34% 0.61% Use of rich media is still new enough that not all of the Q3 2003 1.57% 0.29% 0.76% wrinkles have been ironed out, he says. Advertising.com’s Q4 2003 1.24% 0.27% 0.44% network has a reach of roughly 125 million unique users, Q1 2004 0.98% 0.25% – but the entire network is not yet rich media enabled. Q2 2004 1.17% 0.23% – “Right now the figure stands at about 70%,” he says. Q3 2004 1.17% 0.20% – Source: DoubleClick, November 2004 Meanwhile, the process can still be sticky. “There’s not 058416 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com one standard, no common language, for rich media. The 058416 reach is there but some of the process is still being worked out.” The challenges, though, are easily outweighed by the potential benefits—in particular the chance to interact with customers. “The big issue is responsible marketing,” he says. “You can overdo it with obnoxiously loud volume or offensive graphics. But if we’re responsible as marketers, there’s not much downside risk.” Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 7
  • 8. D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness Frequency Capping Again, the specific rich media format influences response rates. Ad frequency makes a difference in the click rate. Data from While 28.8% of users interacted with floating ads during the first Eyeblaster for the 14 months from January 2002 through February quarter of 2004, only about half that number interacted with rich 2003 indicate that while the average CTR was 5.99%, it peaked at media banners or expandable ads. Note, too, that DoubleClick 6.36% among users who had seen an ad two times, dropping off counts even the act of closing the ad window as a viable metric, to 5.33% when users were exposed to an ad six or more times. since user perception of the ad takes place during that brief time. Not every marketer might feel that way, however. Logical enough—familiarity breeds, if not contempt, disinterest in clicking. Therefore, if part of a marketer’s goals with a rich media- Interaction* Rates with Rich Media Ads on based ad campaign is the direct response of a click, make certain DoubleClick Network Worldwide, by Type of Ad, Q1 2004 to limit the frequency of ads that run on any single site. Rich media banner 15.5% Click-Through Rate for Rich Media Ads Run on the Rich media expandable 14.0% Eyeblaster Platform, by Ad Frequency, January 2002 - February 2003 Rich media floating 28.8% 1x 6.00% Average 18.4% 2x 6.36% Note: *DoubleClick defines interaction as including "a mouse-over, a pull-down, game playing, clicking to another layer of information, or closing 3x 6.03% the window in which the ad appears" Source: DoubleClick, May 2004 4x 5.93% 060965 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 5x 5.84% 060965 6x+ 5.33% Note: Average click-through rate=5.99%; seven rich media ad formats Source: Eyeblaster, April 2003 048856 ©2003 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 048856 Ad Formats Ad format makes a difference for CTRs, according to Dynamic Logic’s study of Eyeblaster-branded interstitials. The floating ad— where the creative is not bound by a rectangular banner shape and moves on top of the page content—had a 4.39% CTR compared to 1.56% for a commercial break ad (a full-page unit that plays on site entry or before a site page). Click-Through Rate for Rich Media Interstitial Ads* for Snuggle Botanical Bliss, by Creative Format, 2003 Floating ad 4.39% Commercial break 1.56% GIF banner 0.11% Note: *the two types of Eyeblaster-branded rich media interstitials used were a commercial break (a full-page ad that plays on site entry or before any other site page) and a floating ad (moves within transparent layer over Web page and plays within area up to 500x500 pixels) Source: Eyeblaster/Dynamic Logic, April 2003 050030 ©2003 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 050030 DoubleClick also measures “interaction” rates, referring to user- initiated events such as “a mouse-over, a pull-down, game playing, clicking to another layer of information, or closing the window in which the ad appears.” Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 8
  • 9. D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness User Interaction Rates* and Average Brand Playing With the Ads Interaction Times** for Rich Media Ads Using PointRoll Technology, by Industry, August Perhaps it goes without saying that the creative side of 2004-October 2004 any rich media ad plays a huge role in generating clicks Interaction rate Average brand interaction time and interaction. A recent campaign that generated strong (in seconds) response was Moxie Interactive’s work for Verizon Automotive 17.9% 9.9 Wireless’s new VCAST service offering streaming media to Pharmaceutical 12.0% 12.8 wireless phones. Moxie developed floating ads with Consumer goods 9.0% 12.4 streaming video that allowed users to get a sense of the Finance 8.8% 8.7 VCAST service. Retail 8.6% 11.7 Technology 8.6% 15.2 “We wanted banners that people could play with,” says Travel 8.6% 9.4 Moxie Vice President Joel Lunenfeld. “Our goal was to Entertainment 8.2% 11.2 clearly shout that Verizon has this new service, and to Telecommunications 7.6% 11.7 match the innovative service by putting it in people’s Total 9.5% 11.3 hands online and letting them play with it.” Note: interaction defined as "any time a unique user rolls over the ad unit to expand a panel"; *interaction rate defined as total interactions divided The campaign was not easy to pull off, Mr. Lunenfeld says, by total impressions; **average brand interaction time defined as "weighted average of total seconds that panels were displayed within an because it needed clearance from the sites where the ads individual impression" Source: PointRoll, November 2004 were to run. “We needed permission to run streaming 061715 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com video uninitiated,” he says. (He suggests reaching out to 061715 media partners to reach agreements early in the process.) Indirect Response But the campaign delivered significant results of interest Beyond click-through and interaction time, indirect response is to both brand and direct marketers. “Click-through rates another key measure. DoubleClick found that consumers were more were phenomenal,” he says, at over 3% during the first likely to visit an advertiser’s Web site or purchase the company’s week. Interaction times, meanwhile, were roughly 13 product after viewing a rich-media ad than a non-rich media one. seconds. (Moxie worked with Advertising.com using PointRoll Technology on the campaign. See chart below Post-impression activity per impression was 1.11% for rich media for statistics from PointRoll on interaction times.) in Q4 2003 versus 0.54% for non-rich media. And when tracked, each rich media activity created greater conversion to sales than But beyond the interaction, Moxie saw gratifying message did static display ads. results as well. “We started off the campaign by doing roadblocks, geo-targeted, frequency capping at one per Consumer Post-Impression Reactions to Rich Media user per day,” he says. “We saw 39.5% message vs. Non-Rich Media Online Ads, Q4 2003 association from the roadblocks alone.” Post-impression activity* per impression 1.11% 0.54% Post-impression sales** per activity 2.30% 1.47% Rich media Non-rich media Note: *any activity taken by a consumer subsequent to viewing an online ad but not clicking on it; includes visiting advertiser's Web site, downloading document or filling in form for more information; **conversion data here represents only DART for Advertisers data in which advertisers tracked conversions through Spotlight tags Source: DoubleClick, February 2004 060941 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 060941 Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 9
  • 10. D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness Data from Advertising.com supports the DoubleClick post- Brand Metrics for Rich Media Ads vs. GIF/JPG/HTML impression activity results, showing rich media’s strength over Ads, Q2 2003 (as a % lift over unexposed group) display advertising. Brand awareness 7% Take a recent week of activity on the Advertising.com network. 5% While only 11.67% of the total impressions were for rich media Message association ads, fully 22.71% of “actions” took place in response to such ads. In 31% this case, actions are defined as “any post-click event, such as 18% lead acquisition or a user filling out a site registration.” Brand favorability 6% Rich Media Ad's Share of Impressions, Clicks and Actions* on Advertising.com Network, Week of 4% January 1, 2005-Week of March 12, 2005 Purchase intent Impressions Clicks Actions 5% Week of January 1 14.25% 21.55% 30.15% 4% Week of January 8 13.64% 21.41% 23.67% Rich media GIF/JPG/HTML Week of January 15 15.45% 22.52% 24.11% Note: Dynamic Logic's MarketNorms database defines rich media as Week of January 22 16.34% 21.23% 24.38% "including DHTML, Flash, rollover/expand, Superstitial, Eyeblaster, and Week of January 29 14.65% 19.56% 18.97% Pointroll, [but] does not include video and audio" Source: Dynamic Logic, 2004; DoubleClick, May 2004 Week of February 5 13.36% 19.97% 15.80% 060964 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com Week of February 12 12.32% 19.06% 15.68% 060964 Week of February 19 12.96% 24.92% 17.70% Week of February 26 13.69% 30.91% 18.74% The Bottom Line Week of March 5 13.12% 27.62% 18.66% For many advertisers, click rates, interaction measurements, and Week of March 12 11.67% 21.94% 22.71% brand lift are secondary to the fundamental goal of customer Note: *actions defined as any post-click event, such as lead acquisition or acquisition. A poll of online retailers by the e-tailing group found that user filling out a site registration Source: Advertising.com, March 2003 customer acquisition was the most important marketing objective. 063910 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 063910 US Online Retailers' Rankings of Their Marketing Objectives, 2004 (as a % of respondents) Branding Effectiveness Very Impor- Some- Not Not Not To measure the branding effectiveness of online advertising, impor- tant what very at all applicable tant impor- impor- impor- marketers typically employ the services of third-party companies tant tant tant such as Dynamic Logic. Basing its research primarily on Customer acquisition 72% 21% 7% 0% 0% 1% exposed/control consumer panels, Dynamic Logic has developed Convert browsers to 67% 26% 6% 1% 0% 1% buyers its MarketNorms database, as a benchmark to compare any Customer retention 67% 25% 7% 1% 0% 1% current campaign. Drive traffic to site 49% 28% 20% 3% 0% 0% Dynamic Logic has found that rich media ads generate increased Minimize shopping 33% 34% 22% 7% 2% 3% cart abandonment readings for branding metrics when compared to control group Integrated multi- 26% 29% 22% 8% 5% 10% figures. Message association showed the strongest lift. It is important channel initiative to note that these figures do not include audio or video ads. Reduce spam 10% 18% 30% 17% 8% 17% Source: the e-tailing group, Exmplar, Inc., October 2004 062630 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 062630 Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 10
  • 11. D. Measuring Rich Media Effectiveness E. Obstacles—and Solutions That’s the goal for Internet phone service provider Vonage. “We Rich media is poised to become the dominant are focused on customer acquisition at a good CPA,” or cost per acquisition, says Caroline Finch, director of marketing. form of Web site advertising, but obstacles remain. Vonage judges rich media online ads, including streaming video, A key issue is cost, from both the marketer’s and the publisher’s on that single goal. “We look at rich media as a way to increase perspective. According to a JupiterResearch survey, more than a awareness, educate consumers, and provide an enjoyable quarter of respondents cited cost as a reason for not buying experience—but with the focus still on customer acquisition,” online video advertising. (It should be noted that nearly as many says Ms. Finch. cited unfamiliarity with the format.) The success of an ad is simple, she says: track acquisitions based Reasons that US Marketers Give for Not Buying on individual campaigns. “Some companies do look at other Online Video Advertising, 2004 (as a % of metrics,” she says, “but we don’t. It’s primarily acquisitions at an respondents) acceptable CPA.” Audience is too small 38% Price is too high 27% Too unfamiliar with the format 21% Publisher offerings aren't attractive enough 19% Poor picture quality 14% Source: JupiterResearch, 2004; MediaPost, July 2004 060959 ©2004 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 060959 On the publishing side, Web sites are nervous about the costs associated with rich media, in particular streaming media. While 70% of publishers support rich media ads, only 27% support streaming content. Types of Advertising Capabilities Supported by US Online Publishing Sites, December 2004 (as a % of respondents) Web banners 87.2% Rich media 69.2% Pop-ups and pop-unders 60.3% Contextual advertising 51.3% Streaming content 26.9% Behavioral targeting 24.4% Other 3.8% Source: Advertising.com, February 2005 062848 ©2005 eMarketer, Inc. www.eMarketer.com 062848 Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 11
  • 12. E. Obstacles—and Solutions About this White Paper The restrictions placed on certain formats by individual Web sites Much of this white paper is based on research may pose inventory challenges for advertisers looking for broad reach. The promulgation of standards will help alleviate this issue. that originally appeared in the eMarketer And the growth of rich media use will persuade more cautious spotlight report, “Rich Media: Techniques and publishers to support it. In the meantime, advertising networks are Trends,” by Senior Analyst David Hallerman. one option for advertisers seeking wider audiences. Additional reporting and writing for this paper Cost issues will not disappear, but as with any technology, they will decline over time as the use of rich media becomes more was done by Ezra Palmer. common. And even now, on a cost per click basis rich media seems to be worth its price. eMarketer Contact Information eMarketer, Inc. Toll-Free: 800-405-0844 Certainly cost is an issue when considering streaming audio and 75 Broad Street Outside the US: 212-763-6010 video—tools that give marketers the ability to create the 32nd floor Fax: 212-763-6020 emotional impact of brand advertising on television and radio. One New York, NY 10004 E-Mail: sales@emarketer.com route around this problem is repurposing content from other media—but this must be done with an eye toward the characteristics of the Internet. Advertising.com Contact Information Advertising.com Phone: 212-497-0085 “We can’t treat this like TV,” says Advertising.com’s Mr. Ferber. “If Lauren Weinberg HTTP://www.advertising.com we just repurpose, we’re not making the most of the medium.” 625 Broadway, 5th Floor E-Mail:research@advertising.com A campaign by Adidas made use of repurposed content—with a New York, NY 10012 twist. An Adidas TV spot featuring Muhammad Ali “boxing” with his daughter was downloaded more than 2.5 million times. The twist: The knockout wasn’t included in the TV part of the campaign, and could only be accessed online. Meanwhile, interactive streaming media advertising is still, at this point, not very common. But the success stories, like the Jerry Seinfeld-Superman Webisodes for American Express and Burger King’s Subservient Chicken site, point up the marketing possibilities. Inventiveness like this is at the heart of successful rich media spots. At WSJ.com, the highest impact unit is a “sliding brand launch unit,” which briefly expands over editorial real estate before sliding back into its designated ad position. As WSJ.com’s Mr. Henry puts it: “We think better advertising is better for everyone, from clients to readers.” Rich Media: At The Tipping Point An eMarketer White Paper 12