SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 41
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Science: the time is now,
the place is Europe!
Kamila Markram, PhD
Co-founder & CEO, Frontiers
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
ESOF 2018, July 11th
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access
works
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
4.2
0.6
0
1
2
3
4
5
Subscription Open Access
Articles(2015-17),Millions
2.7
2.9
2.6
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.9
Subscription Open Access
AverageCites(2015-17)
Articles Average Citations
(1,459 journals)(12,131 journals)(1,459 journals)(12,131 journals)
Open Access journals get more cites on average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
2.7
2.9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
APS OUP ACS Springer
Nature
Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor &
Francis
AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters
Kluwer
Sage Walter
de
Gruyter
SPIE
AverageCites(2015-2017)
Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average
Open Access journals get more cites across publishers
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
American
Physical
Society
Oxford
University
Press
American
Chemical
Society
Royal
Society of
Chemistry
American
Institute of
Physics
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers is the 4th most cited publisher
0.83
1.37
1.38
1.65
1.7
1.74
1.92
2.07
2.1
2.16
2.35
3.01
3.1
3.17
3.25
3.64
3.65
3.79
5.01
6.59
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Walter de Gruyter
Cambridge University Press
Taylor & Francis
Hindawi
American Institute of Physics
Sage
IOP Publishing
Wolters Kluwer
IEEE
BMJ Publishing Group
Springer Nature
Wiley
MDPI
Elsevier
PLOS
Oxford University Press
Frontiers
American Physical Society
Royal Society of Chemistry
American Chemical Society
Average citations
#4Most cited
(out of the 20 largest)
Frontiers
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers is the 4th most cited publisher
0.83
1.37
1.38
1.65
1.7
1.74
1.92
2.07
2.1
2.16
2.35
3.01
3.1
3.17
3.25
3.64
3.65
3.79
5.01
6.59
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Walter de Gruyter
Cambridge University Press
Taylor & Francis
Hindawi
American Institute of Physics
Sage
IOP Publishing
Wolters Kluwer
IEEE
BMJ Publishing Group
Springer Nature
Wiley
MDPI
Elsevier
PLOS
Oxford University Press
Frontiers
American Physical Society
Royal Society of Chemistry
American Chemical Society
Average citations
#4Most cited
(out of the 20 largest)
Frontiers
Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017.
Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset:
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers open access journals are top cited
2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018)
Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Displayed is the total number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016.
Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open access journals are top cited
2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018)
Multidisciplinary Science (64 journals)
Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Displayed is the total number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016.
Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on Impact Factor
2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018)
Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (JCR, Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Journals are ranked by their 2017 Impact Factor percentile within the 23 categories where Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are indexed. Across
all 11,655 titles in the 2017-JCR, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 74th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 91th percentile. The Impact Factor is the average number of citations generated in
2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on Impact Factor
2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018)
Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (JCR, Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Journals are ranked by their 2017 Impact Factor percentile within the 23 categories where Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are indexed. Across
all 11,655 titles in the 2017-JCR, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 74th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 91th percentile. The Impact Factor is the average number of citations generated in
2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on CiteScore
2017 CiteScore, Scopus (Elsevier)
Data Source: 2017 CiteScore, Scopus database (Elsevier). Journals are ranked by their 2017 CiteScore percentiles within the 55 Scopus categories in which 35 different Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are
indexed. Across all 25,322 titles in the CiteScore (Scopus) 2017 edition, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 85th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 96th percentile. The CiteScore is the
average number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on CiteScore
2017 CiteScore, Scopus (Elsevier)
Data Source: 2017 CiteScore, Scopus database (Elsevier). Journals are ranked by their 2017 CiteScore percentiles within the 55 Scopus categories in which 35 different Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are
indexed. Across all 25,322 titles in the CiteScore (Scopus) 2017 edition, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 85th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 96th percentile. The CiteScore is the
average number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Scientific excellence
at scale
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
80’000 Editors & Reviewers
1,432
932
746
704
563
541
524
481
460
410
374
362
355
345
313
313
310
297
283
272
271
271
271
259
256
250
245
243
240
239
University of California System
Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS)
Harvard University
University of Texas System
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
State University System of Florida
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (HZ)
Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG)
University College London
Johns Hopkins University
Stanford University
University of Michigan
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
University of Pittsburgh
The State University of New York (SUNY)
Universidade de São Paulo
Sapienza Università di Roma
University of Oxford
University of Toronto
Universität Zürich
King's College London
University of Pennsylvania
Università degli Studi di Padova
University of Cambridge
The University of Queensland
Imperial College London
Data Source: Frontiers, total number of editors and reviewers on the Frontiers editorial boards.
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
90’000 published articles – 64% from world’s top 300 institutions
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Top
10
Top
20
Top
30
Top
40
Top
50
Top
60
Top
70
Top
80
Top
90
Top
100
Top
110
Top
120
Top
130
Top
140
Top
150
Top
160
Top
170
Top
180
Top
190
Top
200
Top
210
Top
220
Top
230
Top
240
Top
250
Top
260
Top
270
Top
280
Top
290
Top
300
6%
33%
20%
52%
64%
Based on Web of Science university ranking 2018
Data Source: Cumulated % of published Frontiers authors based on Web of Science university ranking
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Submission Independent
Review
Interactive
Review
Decision Final
Validation
Published
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
420 million article views & downloads
Data Source: Frontiers article metrics, total views and downloads to ~90’000 articles published, views and downloads sampled in June 2018.
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
420 million article views & downloads
15,000,000
13,000,000
Data Source: Frontiers article metrics, total views and downloads to ~90’000 articles published, views and downloads sampled in June 2018.
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Science
now
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
All publicly funded scientific papers
published in Europe are to be
made free to access by 2020.
Carlos Moedas, European Commissioner for Research,
Science and Innovation
May 27th 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/28/eu-ministers-2020-target-free-access-scientific-papers?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience
14%
37%
53%
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Global UK EU-Funded
Proportion of articles accessible immediatly on
publication (Gold and Green Open Access)
Global: Scimago 2016, Scopus, UK: 2016 data from Monitoring the transition to Open Access (2017), EU funded: 2014 data
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Europe
North America
Asia
Oceania
South America
Africa
49%
of all Frontiers
articles
from Europe
81,000 editors
33,757
26,082
10,930
3,355
2,389
647
42%
of all Frontiers
editors
from Europe
90,000 articles
43,958
31,860
20,361
4,893
3,954
1,233
305,000 authors
125,415
79,931
75,268
10,495
12,932
2,979
41%
of all Frontiers
authors
from Europe
Open Science has been embraced by the European academic community
Data: Frontiers, as of July 2018
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
European research has high impact (based on Frontiers sample)
Data: Frontiers, average views and downloads on Frontiers articles published in 2013, average citations to Frontiers articles published in 2013.
Average views and downloads per article
5,373
5,032
4,620
4,607
4,485
4,485
4,439
4,411
4,321
4,203
United Kingdom
Netherlands
United States
Switzerland
Germany
Japan
France
Spain
Australia
Canada
Netherlands
Australia
France
Spain
United States
Germany
Canada
United Kingdom
Italy
Japan
Average citations per article
16.3
15.9
15.3
15.2
14.3
13.8
13.8
13.8
13.4
13.1
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
European research has high impact (based on Frontiers sample)
Data: Frontiers, average views and downloads on Frontiers articles published in 2013, average citations to Frontiers articles published in 2013.
Average views and downloads per article
5,373
5,032
4,620
4,607
4,485
4,485
4,439
4,411
4,321
4,203
United Kingdom
Netherlands
United States
Switzerland
Germany
Japan
France
Spain
Australia
Canada
Netherlands
Australia
France
Spain
United States
Germany
Canada
United Kingdom
Italy
Japan
Average citations per article
16.3
15.9
15.3
15.2
14.3
13.8
13.8
13.8
13.4
13.1
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
EU funded research has highest impact (based on Frontiers sample)
Data: Frontiers, average views and downloads on Frontiers articles published in 2013, average citations to Frontiers articles published in 2013.
5,373
5,032
5,003
4,620
4,607
4,485
4,485
4,439
4,411
4,321
4,203
United Kingdom
Netherlands
EU Funded
United States
Switzerland
Germany
Japan
France
Spain
Australia
Canada
EU Funded
Netherlands
Australia
France
Spain
United States
Germany
Canada
United Kingdom
Italy
Japan
19.0
16.3
15.9
15.3
15.2
14.3
13.8
13.8
13.8
13.4
13.1
Average views and downloads per article Average citations per article
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
103 collaborations with universities and funders simplify the process for authors
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
First Landmark National Open Access Agreements
“The Austrian Science Fund (FWF) is pleased to be one of the
first signatories of the fully transparent Gold open access
Agreement with Frontiers. Transparency of costs, conditions
and services is a precondition to strengthen Open
Science; hence, this agreement may serve as a role model in
terms of openness for further agreements”
Klement Tockner
President of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2017/12/20/open-access-publishing-deal-university-vienna-austrian-science-fund/
“We are now making clear that entering into agreements with
gold Open Access publishers is an important route to
reaching the goal of immediate Open Access”
Anna Lundén
Head of National Coordination of Libraries
National Library of Sweden
https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/06/01/sweden-open-access-publishing-deal/
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Open Science
Machine-
readable
AI-ready
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
Innovation
Economic
Growth
Sustainable
Future
Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Small Molecules in Big Data - Analytica Munich
Small Molecules in Big Data - Analytica MunichSmall Molecules in Big Data - Analytica Munich
Small Molecules in Big Data - Analytica Munich
Emma Schymanski
 
Searching for chemical information using PubChem
Searching for chemical information using PubChemSearching for chemical information using PubChem
Searching for chemical information using PubChem
Sunghwan Kim
 
COUNTER stats: applying JR1
COUNTER stats: applying JR1COUNTER stats: applying JR1
COUNTER stats: applying JR1
Jason Price, PhD
 
The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...
The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...
The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure
 
Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...
Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...
Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure
 
ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...
ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...
ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure
 
Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...
Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...
Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure
 
Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...
Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...
Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Small Molecules in Big Data - Analytica Munich
Small Molecules in Big Data - Analytica MunichSmall Molecules in Big Data - Analytica Munich
Small Molecules in Big Data - Analytica Munich
 
RSC ChemSpider Science Commons Symposium Pacific Northwest #scspn
RSC ChemSpider Science Commons Symposium Pacific Northwest #scspnRSC ChemSpider Science Commons Symposium Pacific Northwest #scspn
RSC ChemSpider Science Commons Symposium Pacific Northwest #scspn
 
Connecting Chemists to the Internet Through ChemSpider
Connecting Chemists to the Internet Through ChemSpiderConnecting Chemists to the Internet Through ChemSpider
Connecting Chemists to the Internet Through ChemSpider
 
US EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard Data Integration Hub to Support Environmen...
US EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard Data Integration Hub to Support Environmen...US EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard Data Integration Hub to Support Environmen...
US EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard Data Integration Hub to Support Environmen...
 
ChemSpider and How The Wisdom Of The Crowds Can Improve The Quality Of ...
ChemSpider  and How The Wisdom Of The  Crowds  Can  Improve The  Quality Of  ...ChemSpider  and How The Wisdom Of The  Crowds  Can  Improve The  Quality Of  ...
ChemSpider and How The Wisdom Of The Crowds Can Improve The Quality Of ...
 
ChemSpider Overview Presentation at Special Libraries Association
ChemSpider Overview Presentation at Special Libraries AssociationChemSpider Overview Presentation at Special Libraries Association
ChemSpider Overview Presentation at Special Libraries Association
 
Citation Analysis in Web of Science
Citation Analysis in Web of ScienceCitation Analysis in Web of Science
Citation Analysis in Web of Science
 
UMN Scopus & SciVal Meeting 12-1-11
UMN Scopus & SciVal Meeting 12-1-11UMN Scopus & SciVal Meeting 12-1-11
UMN Scopus & SciVal Meeting 12-1-11
 
Wiley Online Library
Wiley Online LibraryWiley Online Library
Wiley Online Library
 
Searching for chemical information using PubChem
Searching for chemical information using PubChemSearching for chemical information using PubChem
Searching for chemical information using PubChem
 
Global standards in honey bee research
Global standards in honey bee researchGlobal standards in honey bee research
Global standards in honey bee research
 
COUNTER stats: applying JR1
COUNTER stats: applying JR1COUNTER stats: applying JR1
COUNTER stats: applying JR1
 
2014.jul.em
2014.jul.em2014.jul.em
2014.jul.em
 
The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...
The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...
The EPA Comptox Chemicals Dashboard as a Data Integration Hub for Environment...
 
Crawling Across the Web of Chemistry Using ChemSpider
Crawling Across the Web of Chemistry Using ChemSpider Crawling Across the Web of Chemistry Using ChemSpider
Crawling Across the Web of Chemistry Using ChemSpider
 
Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...
Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...
Structure identification by Mass Spectrometry Non-Targeted Analysis using the...
 
ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...
ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...
ChemSpider – A Community Platform for Chemistry and Resources Supporting the ...
 
Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...
Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...
Web-based access to data for >600 disinfection by-products via the EPA CompTo...
 
Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...
Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...
Structure identification approaches using the EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard...
 
PubChem for drug discovery and chemical biology
PubChem for drug discovery and chemical biologyPubChem for drug discovery and chemical biology
PubChem for drug discovery and chemical biology
 

Ähnlich wie Open Science: the time is now, the place is Europe

Holy Cross Lunch and Learn
Holy Cross Lunch and LearnHoly Cross Lunch and Learn
Holy Cross Lunch and Learn
rachelmccullough
 
University at Albany Lunch and Learn
University at Albany Lunch and LearnUniversity at Albany Lunch and Learn
University at Albany Lunch and Learn
rachelmccullough
 
SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008
SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008
SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008
Elizabeth Brown
 
David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017
David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017
David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017
Crossref
 
Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"
Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"
Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"
colleeflower22
 
Latest Developments in Open Access
Latest Developments in Open AccessLatest Developments in Open Access
Latest Developments in Open Access
BioMedCentral
 

Ähnlich wie Open Science: the time is now, the place is Europe (20)

SciVerse @ TJU
SciVerse @ TJUSciVerse @ TJU
SciVerse @ TJU
 
Web of Science NUI Galway October 2018
Web of Science NUI Galway October 2018Web of Science NUI Galway October 2018
Web of Science NUI Galway October 2018
 
Egyptian knowledge bank
Egyptian knowledge bankEgyptian knowledge bank
Egyptian knowledge bank
 
Afternoon Talk on Open Access and Predatory Journals
Afternoon Talk on Open Access and Predatory JournalsAfternoon Talk on Open Access and Predatory Journals
Afternoon Talk on Open Access and Predatory Journals
 
Preprints: a journey though time
Preprints: a journey though timePreprints: a journey though time
Preprints: a journey though time
 
Open Access and Publishers - Michael Mabe (2007)
Open Access and Publishers - Michael Mabe (2007)Open Access and Publishers - Michael Mabe (2007)
Open Access and Publishers - Michael Mabe (2007)
 
Afternoon Talk on Impact Factor and Improved Access to Papers (July 2018)
Afternoon Talk on Impact Factor and Improved Access to Papers (July 2018)Afternoon Talk on Impact Factor and Improved Access to Papers (July 2018)
Afternoon Talk on Impact Factor and Improved Access to Papers (July 2018)
 
Holy Cross Lunch and Learn
Holy Cross Lunch and LearnHoly Cross Lunch and Learn
Holy Cross Lunch and Learn
 
The value of the scholarly-led, non-profit business model to achieve Open Acc...
The value of the scholarly-led, non-profit business model to achieve Open Acc...The value of the scholarly-led, non-profit business model to achieve Open Acc...
The value of the scholarly-led, non-profit business model to achieve Open Acc...
 
The Value of the Scholarly-led, Non-profit Business Model to Achieve Open Acc...
The Value of the Scholarly-led, Non-profit Business Model to Achieve Open Acc...The Value of the Scholarly-led, Non-profit Business Model to Achieve Open Acc...
The Value of the Scholarly-led, Non-profit Business Model to Achieve Open Acc...
 
Syracuse Lunch and Learn
Syracuse Lunch and LearnSyracuse Lunch and Learn
Syracuse Lunch and Learn
 
University at Albany Lunch and Learn
University at Albany Lunch and LearnUniversity at Albany Lunch and Learn
University at Albany Lunch and Learn
 
SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008
SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008
SPARC Overview and Update, October 2008
 
Derk Haank: Open Access publishing at Springer
Derk Haank: Open Access publishing at SpringerDerk Haank: Open Access publishing at Springer
Derk Haank: Open Access publishing at Springer
 
Como aumentar el impacto de tus publicaciones - How to improve your publicati...
Como aumentar el impacto de tus publicaciones - How to improve your publicati...Como aumentar el impacto de tus publicaciones - How to improve your publicati...
Como aumentar el impacto de tus publicaciones - How to improve your publicati...
 
Journal impact measures: the Impact Factor
Journal impact measures: the Impact FactorJournal impact measures: the Impact Factor
Journal impact measures: the Impact Factor
 
‘How does Open Access research sit in a Citation network?’ - Guillaume Rivall...
‘How does Open Access research sit in a Citation network?’ - Guillaume Rivall...‘How does Open Access research sit in a Citation network?’ - Guillaume Rivall...
‘How does Open Access research sit in a Citation network?’ - Guillaume Rivall...
 
David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017
David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017
David Shotton - OpenCon Oxford, 1st Dec 2017
 
Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"
Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"
Boston SciVerse "Brunch & Learn"
 
Latest Developments in Open Access
Latest Developments in Open AccessLatest Developments in Open Access
Latest Developments in Open Access
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
Scintica Instrumentation
 
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune WaterworldsBiogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Sérgio Sacani
 
Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.
Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.
Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.
Silpa
 
Digital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptx
Digital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptxDigital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptx
Digital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptx
MohamedFarag457087
 
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learningModule for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
levieagacer
 
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Silpa
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Selaginella: features, morphology ,anatomy and reproduction.
Selaginella: features, morphology ,anatomy and reproduction.Selaginella: features, morphology ,anatomy and reproduction.
Selaginella: features, morphology ,anatomy and reproduction.
 
Gwalior ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Gwalior ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
Gwalior ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Gwalior ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRLGwalior ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Gwalior ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
Gwalior ❤CALL GIRL 84099*07087 ❤CALL GIRLS IN Gwalior ESCORT SERVICE❤CALL GIRL
 
Grade 7 - Lesson 1 - Microscope and Its Functions
Grade 7 - Lesson 1 - Microscope and Its FunctionsGrade 7 - Lesson 1 - Microscope and Its Functions
Grade 7 - Lesson 1 - Microscope and Its Functions
 
Role of AI in seed science Predictive modelling and Beyond.pptx
Role of AI in seed science  Predictive modelling and  Beyond.pptxRole of AI in seed science  Predictive modelling and  Beyond.pptx
Role of AI in seed science Predictive modelling and Beyond.pptx
 
Proteomics: types, protein profiling steps etc.
Proteomics: types, protein profiling steps etc.Proteomics: types, protein profiling steps etc.
Proteomics: types, protein profiling steps etc.
 
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
(May 9, 2024) Enhanced Ultrafast Vector Flow Imaging (VFI) Using Multi-Angle ...
 
Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx .
Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx       .Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx       .
Factory Acceptance Test( FAT).pptx .
 
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune WaterworldsBiogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
Biogenic Sulfur Gases as Biosignatures on Temperate Sub-Neptune Waterworlds
 
Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.
Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.
Cyathodium bryophyte: morphology, anatomy, reproduction etc.
 
Climate Change Impacts on Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems.pptx
Climate Change Impacts on Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems.pptxClimate Change Impacts on Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems.pptx
Climate Change Impacts on Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems.pptx
 
Clean In Place(CIP).pptx .
Clean In Place(CIP).pptx                 .Clean In Place(CIP).pptx                 .
Clean In Place(CIP).pptx .
 
Digital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptx
Digital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptxDigital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptx
Digital Dentistry.Digital Dentistryvv.pptx
 
PSYCHOSOCIAL NEEDS. in nursing II sem pptx
PSYCHOSOCIAL NEEDS. in nursing II sem pptxPSYCHOSOCIAL NEEDS. in nursing II sem pptx
PSYCHOSOCIAL NEEDS. in nursing II sem pptx
 
TransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRings
TransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRingsTransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRings
TransientOffsetin14CAftertheCarringtonEventRecordedbyPolarTreeRings
 
Use of mutants in understanding seedling development.pptx
Use of mutants in understanding seedling development.pptxUse of mutants in understanding seedling development.pptx
Use of mutants in understanding seedling development.pptx
 
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 2) Basic concept of organic chemistry
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 2) Basic concept of organic chemistry GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 2) Basic concept of organic chemistry
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 2) Basic concept of organic chemistry
 
Site Acceptance Test .
Site Acceptance Test                    .Site Acceptance Test                    .
Site Acceptance Test .
 
Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical aspects
Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical  aspectsDr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical  aspects
Dr. E. Muralinath_ Blood indices_clinical aspects
 
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learningModule for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
Module for Grade 9 for Asynchronous/Distance learning
 
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
Phenolics: types, biosynthesis and functions.
 

Open Science: the time is now, the place is Europe

  • 1. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Science: the time is now, the place is Europe! Kamila Markram, PhD Co-founder & CEO, Frontiers Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne ESOF 2018, July 11th
  • 2. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access works
  • 3. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 4.2 0.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 Subscription Open Access Articles(2015-17),Millions 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 Subscription Open Access AverageCites(2015-17) Articles Average Citations (1,459 journals)(12,131 journals)(1,459 journals)(12,131 journals) Open Access journals get more cites on average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
  • 4. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
  • 5. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 6. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 7. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 8. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 9. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 10. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Access journals get more cites across publishers 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 11. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 2.7 2.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 APS OUP ACS Springer Nature Frontiers RSC IOP IEEE PLOS Wiley MDPI Taylor & Francis AIP Elsevier Hindawi CUP Wolters Kluwer Sage Walter de Gruyter SPIE AverageCites(2015-2017) Subscription Open Access Market subscription average Market OA average Open Access journals get more cites across publishers Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/ American Physical Society Oxford University Press American Chemical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Institute of Physics
  • 12. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers is the 4th most cited publisher 0.83 1.37 1.38 1.65 1.7 1.74 1.92 2.07 2.1 2.16 2.35 3.01 3.1 3.17 3.25 3.64 3.65 3.79 5.01 6.59 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Walter de Gruyter Cambridge University Press Taylor & Francis Hindawi American Institute of Physics Sage IOP Publishing Wolters Kluwer IEEE BMJ Publishing Group Springer Nature Wiley MDPI Elsevier PLOS Oxford University Press Frontiers American Physical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Chemical Society Average citations #4Most cited (out of the 20 largest) Frontiers Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
  • 13. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers is the 4th most cited publisher 0.83 1.37 1.38 1.65 1.7 1.74 1.92 2.07 2.1 2.16 2.35 3.01 3.1 3.17 3.25 3.64 3.65 3.79 5.01 6.59 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Walter de Gruyter Cambridge University Press Taylor & Francis Hindawi American Institute of Physics Sage IOP Publishing Wolters Kluwer IEEE BMJ Publishing Group Springer Nature Wiley MDPI Elsevier PLOS Oxford University Press Frontiers American Physical Society Royal Society of Chemistry American Chemical Society Average citations #4Most cited (out of the 20 largest) Frontiers Source: Scimago (2018). Data based on 20 top publishers by volume in 2017. Total document and citation counts are for the 3-year period ending 2017. Publisher and business model assignments based on Scopus, DOAJ and official journal listings on publisher websites. More info and full dataset: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/11/scientific-excellence-at-scale-open-access-journals-have-a-clear-citation-advantage-over-subscription-journals/
  • 14. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers open access journals are top cited 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Displayed is the total number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
  • 15. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open access journals are top cited 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) Multidisciplinary Science (64 journals) Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Displayed is the total number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
  • 16. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on Impact Factor 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (JCR, Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Journals are ranked by their 2017 Impact Factor percentile within the 23 categories where Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are indexed. Across all 11,655 titles in the 2017-JCR, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 74th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 91th percentile. The Impact Factor is the average number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
  • 17. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on Impact Factor 2017 Journal Citation Reports (Clarivate Analytics, 2018) Data Source: 2017 Journal Citation Reports (JCR, Clarivate Analytics, 2018). Journals are ranked by their 2017 Impact Factor percentile within the 23 categories where Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are indexed. Across all 11,655 titles in the 2017-JCR, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 74th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 91th percentile. The Impact Factor is the average number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking/
  • 18. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on CiteScore 2017 CiteScore, Scopus (Elsevier) Data Source: 2017 CiteScore, Scopus database (Elsevier). Journals are ranked by their 2017 CiteScore percentiles within the 55 Scopus categories in which 35 different Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are indexed. Across all 25,322 titles in the CiteScore (Scopus) 2017 edition, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 85th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 96th percentile. The CiteScore is the average number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking
  • 19. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Frontiers journals rank in the top percentiles on CiteScore 2017 CiteScore, Scopus (Elsevier) Data Source: 2017 CiteScore, Scopus database (Elsevier). Journals are ranked by their 2017 CiteScore percentiles within the 55 Scopus categories in which 35 different Frontiers journals (yellow dots) are indexed. Across all 25,322 titles in the CiteScore (Scopus) 2017 edition, Frontiers journals rank, on average, at the 85th percentile, with the highest journal ranking at the 96th percentile. The CiteScore is the average number of citations generated in 2017 to articles published in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Read also: https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/07/02/impact-factor-scientific-academic-journal-ranking
  • 20. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Scientific excellence at scale
  • 21. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
  • 22. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 80’000 Editors & Reviewers 1,432 932 746 704 563 541 524 481 460 410 374 362 355 345 313 313 310 297 283 272 271 271 271 259 256 250 245 243 240 239 University of California System Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) Harvard University University of Texas System National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) State University System of Florida Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) Chinese Academy of Sciences Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (HZ) Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (CNR) Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (MPG) University College London Johns Hopkins University Stanford University University of Michigan Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) University of Pittsburgh The State University of New York (SUNY) Universidade de São Paulo Sapienza Università di Roma University of Oxford University of Toronto Universität Zürich King's College London University of Pennsylvania Università degli Studi di Padova University of Cambridge The University of Queensland Imperial College London Data Source: Frontiers, total number of editors and reviewers on the Frontiers editorial boards.
  • 23. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 90’000 published articles – 64% from world’s top 300 institutions 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Top 10 Top 20 Top 30 Top 40 Top 50 Top 60 Top 70 Top 80 Top 90 Top 100 Top 110 Top 120 Top 130 Top 140 Top 150 Top 160 Top 170 Top 180 Top 190 Top 200 Top 210 Top 220 Top 230 Top 240 Top 250 Top 260 Top 270 Top 280 Top 290 Top 300 6% 33% 20% 52% 64% Based on Web of Science university ranking 2018 Data Source: Cumulated % of published Frontiers authors based on Web of Science university ranking
  • 24. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
  • 25. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Submission Independent Review Interactive Review Decision Final Validation Published
  • 26. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
  • 27. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
  • 28. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 420 million article views & downloads Data Source: Frontiers article metrics, total views and downloads to ~90’000 articles published, views and downloads sampled in June 2018.
  • 29. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 420 million article views & downloads 15,000,000 13,000,000 Data Source: Frontiers article metrics, total views and downloads to ~90’000 articles published, views and downloads sampled in June 2018.
  • 30. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th
  • 31. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Science now
  • 32. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th All publicly funded scientific papers published in Europe are to be made free to access by 2020. Carlos Moedas, European Commissioner for Research, Science and Innovation May 27th 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/may/28/eu-ministers-2020-target-free-access-scientific-papers?CMP=twt_a-science_b-gdnscience 14% 37% 53% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Global UK EU-Funded Proportion of articles accessible immediatly on publication (Gold and Green Open Access) Global: Scimago 2016, Scopus, UK: 2016 data from Monitoring the transition to Open Access (2017), EU funded: 2014 data
  • 33. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Europe North America Asia Oceania South America Africa 49% of all Frontiers articles from Europe 81,000 editors 33,757 26,082 10,930 3,355 2,389 647 42% of all Frontiers editors from Europe 90,000 articles 43,958 31,860 20,361 4,893 3,954 1,233 305,000 authors 125,415 79,931 75,268 10,495 12,932 2,979 41% of all Frontiers authors from Europe Open Science has been embraced by the European academic community Data: Frontiers, as of July 2018
  • 34. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th European research has high impact (based on Frontiers sample) Data: Frontiers, average views and downloads on Frontiers articles published in 2013, average citations to Frontiers articles published in 2013. Average views and downloads per article 5,373 5,032 4,620 4,607 4,485 4,485 4,439 4,411 4,321 4,203 United Kingdom Netherlands United States Switzerland Germany Japan France Spain Australia Canada Netherlands Australia France Spain United States Germany Canada United Kingdom Italy Japan Average citations per article 16.3 15.9 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.4 13.1
  • 35. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th European research has high impact (based on Frontiers sample) Data: Frontiers, average views and downloads on Frontiers articles published in 2013, average citations to Frontiers articles published in 2013. Average views and downloads per article 5,373 5,032 4,620 4,607 4,485 4,485 4,439 4,411 4,321 4,203 United Kingdom Netherlands United States Switzerland Germany Japan France Spain Australia Canada Netherlands Australia France Spain United States Germany Canada United Kingdom Italy Japan Average citations per article 16.3 15.9 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.4 13.1
  • 36. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th EU funded research has highest impact (based on Frontiers sample) Data: Frontiers, average views and downloads on Frontiers articles published in 2013, average citations to Frontiers articles published in 2013. 5,373 5,032 5,003 4,620 4,607 4,485 4,485 4,439 4,411 4,321 4,203 United Kingdom Netherlands EU Funded United States Switzerland Germany Japan France Spain Australia Canada EU Funded Netherlands Australia France Spain United States Germany Canada United Kingdom Italy Japan 19.0 16.3 15.9 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.4 13.1 Average views and downloads per article Average citations per article
  • 37. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th 103 collaborations with universities and funders simplify the process for authors
  • 38. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th First Landmark National Open Access Agreements “The Austrian Science Fund (FWF) is pleased to be one of the first signatories of the fully transparent Gold open access Agreement with Frontiers. Transparency of costs, conditions and services is a precondition to strengthen Open Science; hence, this agreement may serve as a role model in terms of openness for further agreements” Klement Tockner President of the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) https://blog.frontiersin.org/2017/12/20/open-access-publishing-deal-university-vienna-austrian-science-fund/ “We are now making clear that entering into agreements with gold Open Access publishers is an important route to reaching the goal of immediate Open Access” Anna Lundén Head of National Coordination of Libraries National Library of Sweden https://blog.frontiersin.org/2018/06/01/sweden-open-access-publishing-deal/
  • 39. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Open Science Machine- readable AI-ready
  • 40. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th Innovation Economic Growth Sustainable Future
  • 41. Kamila Markram at ESOF 2018, July 11th

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. • Centralize APC payments to make it easier for authors to publish with us • 50 to now 103 plans and we expect this number to keep growing rapidly. • Started collaborating with funders too – agreed with the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation so all of their grantees' APCs are paid centrally now • Last year at the summit we promised also a first national deal…
  2. Any questions on these deals or collaborations with universities – do reach out to Ronald! Flipping sound on the horizon