2011 Private Well Symposium - The importance for Fixing Private Wells in Pennsylvania - The Marcellus Shale Factor-Concurrent Session 3: Hydrofracturing and Its Impact on Groundwater
Testing Private Wells for Contaminants in Northeast PA
1.
2. Getting The Waters Tested The Marcellus Shale Factor Old Issues New Issues Environment Water Resources Private Wells In PA
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. Properly Constructed Wells and Poorly Constructed Wells Confining Bed Sea Level Stagnant Water – no to little flow Saline Water Proper Construction Brine Water 600 to 1200 ft Fresh Water Poorly Constructed
18. Image Source: Luzernecounty.org Recent Baseline Testing in Luzerne County, PA 320 Private Wells Tested Conducted by Certified Laboratories Third Party Samplers Not Wilkes University Study Area
19. The Source of the Data I am Presenting Today Certified – Third Party Samplers All Testing Completed by Certified Laboratories Using Approved Methods Samples include rigorous QC/QA including Blanks/ Duplicates All wells purged using Standards of Practice Purging Time Based on Stabilized Well Parameters (pH, conductivity, and temperature) The data is the baseline data that was done by EnCana. Homeowners had to approve releasing the data – over 90 % said Yes.
20. Up to 3% influenced by Saline Water – These same samples have methane approaching 7 mg/L or more. Source – Wilkes University Database Total Coliform (49%) 20% E Coli. Positive Lead (22 %) Plasticizers (8%) Arsenic (6%)
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27. Methane Gas Video from Salt Springs State Park – Fall 2010, by Brian Oram http:// www.friendsofsaltspringspark.org “At the base of the gorge is a bubbling salt spring, traces of an 1850s woolen mill, and mid-19th century farmhouses and barns.” Go to: http://youtu.be/2QugRgXGdIQ
28. Methane Gas Migration- Not Related to Marcellus Shale Private Well Landfill Wetland 600 to 1200 ft 1200 to 3000+ ft Gas from Non-Marcellus Shale Groundwater Flow Lake
29. Rock Sample from Quarry – West of Dimock Sandstone Unit – Containing Plant Materials, Organic Muds – Possible Shallow Methane Source
30.
31. It looks like background methane levels may follow a linear/ curvilinear trend. Cabot – Quick Look
32. Bedrock Fractures and Fractured Zones High Yielding Well (High Methane ?) Fractured Zone Lower Yielding Well (Low Methane?)
33. Purge Time, minutes C O N C E N T R A T I O N Methane Increases with Purge Time. How Many Private Well Owner Normally Let Water Run for 45 minutes
34.
35.
36.
37. PSU Study -Migration and Disturbance During Drilling- losing circulation Proper Construction Poor Construction Key Points 1. Proper Casing and Cement of Marcellus Shale Wells 2. Knowing How Private Wells Are Constructed 3. Isolation Distances will not Solve This Problem. 4. Fixing Private Wells has to be part of the Solution. 5. This may account for the data on bromide from PSU. 6. The issue may not be well radial distance, but construction and drilling issue. 7. Recommend closed loop drilling with water within freshwater aquifer (no muds) or water-based muds. up to 2000 ft Lined Pit Could this explain the Bromide Issue??
38. Catskill Formation “ Bluestone Quarry – West of Dimock” Note – Preferential Flow Pathways Along Joints and Bedding Planes 80 feet
39. Migration Concepts- Multiple Casements and Recreate Confining Layers- Need Good Cement Bonds- Cement up to Deepest Casement or Surface Older Younger Water Table Private Well Confining Layer More Conventional Reservoir Target
40. Could Radon Gas be a Good Surrogate for Methane Migration? It cost less to test for Radon than Methane- Not Suggesting we Eliminate Methane- add Radon 9000 psi 4000 psi Is this Possible ? Very Deep Private Well- We have some that are 900 + feet deep
46. Correlation of DRASTIC and Incidences of Contamination Comparison of Relative DRASTIC index vulnerabilities to frequencies of the occurrence of Total Coliform contamination of Buda and Salansky well water samples- Thanks to Encana and the local private well owners. Poor Correlation. – I think poor well construction making wells more vulnerable than anticipated.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
Hinweis der Redaktion
The Marcellus Shale Factor is the reality that private wells in PA provide 1.5 Million citizens with water that does not meet a drinking water standard and as a state we have no real licensing program for well drillers, private well constructions standards, or the ability to fix wells that have been poortly cited and constructed – Part One – The Private Well Factor
Water-soluble products that are placed on the land surface and in streams or surface impoundments Land Disposal Stockpiles and mine tailings Disposal of sewage and sludge Salt spreading Animal feedlots Fertilizers and pesticides Accidental spills Particulate matter from airborne sources Substances that are deposited in the ground above the water table Septic systems, cesspools, and privies. Surface impoundments and lagoons Landfills Waste disposal in excavations Leakage from underground storage tanks Leakage from underground pipelines Artificial recharge Sumps and dry wells Grave yards Disposal, storage, or extraction of materials below the water table Waste disposal in wet excavations Drainage wells and canals Abandoned and exploration wells Water supply wells Waste disposal wells Mines
DRASTIC is a groundwater quality model for evaluating the pollution potential of large areas using the hydrogeologic settings of the region (Aller et al., 1985, Aller et al., 1987, Deichert et al., 1992). This model was developed by EPA and NWWA in the 1980's. A hydrogeologic setting is defined as a mappable unit with common hydrogeologic characteristics. This model employs a numerical ranking system that assigns relative weights to various parameters that help in the evaluation of relative groundwater vulnerability to contamination. DRASTIC is an acronym for the seven hydrogeologic weighted factors used in a rating system that produces a numerical value called the DRASTIC index. The seven parameters are depth to water (D), net recharge (R), aquifer media (A), soil media (S), topography (T), impact of the vadose zone media (I), and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer (C). Higher DRASTIC index values relate to a specific area of greater potential to pollution and contamination while lower DRASTIC index values indicate a specific area of lower potential to pollution and contamination. DRASTIC includes various hydrogeologic settings which influence the pollution potential of a region. The higher the DRASTIC index, the greater the relative pollution potential. The DRASTIC index can be further divided into four categories: low, moderate, high, and very high. The sites with high and very high categories are more vulnerable to contamination and consequently need to be managed more closely. The weights assigned are relative, therefore a site with a low pollution potential may still be susceptible to groundwater contamination but it is less susceptible to contamination compared to the sites with high DRASTIC ratings.
If there is a positive correlation, then we should s