This document discusses different types of intersections and interchanges, including their key elements and design considerations. It describes at-grade intersections, channelization techniques, and different interchange configurations like diamonds, cloverleafs, and trumpets. The document also covers factors in curb radius, turn lane, and sight distance design, and provides examples of determining sufficient sight distance at intersections.
2. 10/23/2012
2
At‐grade intersections
• All highways have intersections at grade
except freeways so that the intersection areaexcept freeways, so that the intersection area
is a part of every connecting road or street.
• In this area, crossing and turning movements
occur.
• Some intersection are channelized
– minimize traffic accidents, speed control,
prevention of prohibited turns, refuge may be
provided for pedestrians.
At‐grade Intersections Types
Unchannelized T
Unchannelized YUnchannelized Y
Flared T
3. 10/23/2012
3
3‐leg intersections
Y with turning roadways
Unchannelized
Channelized
• Traffic circles
–Rotaries: large diameter > 300 ft, allows
At‐grade Intersections Types (Cont.)
Rotaries: large diameter 300 ft, allows
speeds > 30 mph with minimum horizontal
deflection of the path of through traffic
–Neighborhood traffic circle: small diameter,
for local streets, traffic calming
–Roundabout
• Yield control at each approach
• Separation of conflicting movements
• Speed < 30 mph (typically)
4. 10/23/2012
4
Intersection: Key Elements
• Safety and efficiency
• Consider both vehicles and pedestrians
• Minimize severity of potential conflicts
• In general, these conflicts may be classified as:
M i fli t
Merging
Diverging
Basic Principles
– Merging conflicts
• Occurs when vehicles enter a traffic stream
– Diverging conflicts
• Occurs when vehicles leave the traffic stream
– Weaving conflicts
• Occurs by merging then diverging
– Crossing conflicts
• Occurs when they cross paths directly
Weaving
Crossing
5. 10/23/2012
5
Crossing Conflicts Solutions
• Time‐sharing
• Space‐sharing
• Grade separation (Interchanges)
INTERCHANGES
• Are classified according to the way they
h dl l ft t i t ffihandle left‐turning traffic.
INTERCHANGE CONFIGURATION
‐ are selected on the basis of structural cost,
right of way costs and ability to serve trafficright‐of‐way costs, and ability to serve traffic.
7. 10/23/2012
7
Cloverleaf Interchange
Cloverleaf InterchangeCloverleaf Interchange Cloverleaf InterchangeCloverleaf Interchange
Employ Employ loop rampsloop ramps, in , in
which vehicles turn left which vehicles turn left
by turning 270 degrees by turning 270 degrees
to the right.to the right.
12. 10/23/2012
12
Intersection Design Considerations
• 4 or fewer legs (within functional area)
• As close to 90 degrees as possible
• Approach (flat and straight as possible)
– Avoid > 6% on low speed (< 40 mph) and > 3% on high
speed (≥ 50 mph)
• Provide min. grades and max. vertical curve lengths
• Make adjustments away from intersection
23
• Traffic lanes should be visible and obvious to
motorists
• Motorists should understand the path they are
supposed to take
Elements of Design
• Design of alignment
D i f h li t• Design of channeling system
• Determination of minimum required widths of
turning roadways
– Speeds > 15 mph
• Intersection sight distance
24
• Determination of number of lanes
– Provision of turning lanes
13. 10/23/2012
13
Alignment Horizontal
• 90° intersection of approaches
• Skewed
– Visibility
25
– Longer crossing times in some cases
Profile (Vertical)
• Should facilitate driver’s control of vehicle
• Avoid significant changes in grade
• Typically ≤ 3%
• Continue major street grade through
intersection
26
19. 10/23/2012
19
fh Fl b l H h D
37
Source: wwwfhwaFlexibility in Highway Design
- Chapter 8 - FHWA.htm
High Speed Turns
38
20. 10/23/2012
20
Channelization
• Separates conflicting movements into definite
paths of travel
• Uses pavement markings or traffic islands
• Directs vehicle paths so no more than 2 paths
cross at one point
• Controls merging, diverging, and crossing angle of
vehicles
• Provides clear path for different movements
39
• Provides pedestrian refuge
• Provides storage area for turning vehicles
• Controls prohibited turns
• Restricts speed
Types of Channelization
• Raised islands
– Urban
– Provides refuge for
pedestrians
– <= 50 ft2 in urban areas
– <= 75 ft2 in rural areas
P t ki
40
• Pavement markings
– Low pedestrian volume,
low approach speeds
26. 10/23/2012
26
Adequate Sight Distance – ISD
Allow drivers to have an unobstructed view of
intersection
D fi iti R i d ISD i th l th f d• Definition: Required ISD is the length of cross road
that must be visible such that the driver of a
turning/crossing vehicle can decide to and complete
the maneuver without conflict with vehicles
approaching the intersection on the cross road.
51
Adequate Sight Distance – ISD
Sight Triangle – area free of obstructions necessary
to complete maneuver and avoid collision – needed
for approach and departure (from stop sign forfor approach and departure (from stop sign for
example) – Exhibit 9‐50
Allows driver to anticipate and avoid collisions
Allows drivers of stopped vehicles enough view of
the intersection to decide when to enter
52
27. 10/23/2012
27
Sight Triangle
area free of obstructions necessary to
l t d id lli icomplete maneuver and avoid collision –
needed for approach and departure (from
stop sign for example)
Consider horizontal as well as vertical, object
below driver eye height may not be an
53
y g y
obstruction
AASHTO assumes 3.5’ above roadway
54
28. 10/23/2012
28
Sight Distance Obstruction
Hidd V hi lHidden Vehicle
55
ISD Cases
• No control: vehicles adjust speed
• Stop control: where traffic on minor roadway must• Stop control: where traffic on minor roadway must
stop prior to entering major roadway
• Yield control: vehicles on minor roadway must yield
to major roadway traffic
• Signal control: where vehicles on all approaches are
required to stop by either a stop sign or traffic signal
56
• All way stop
• Stopped major roadway left‐turn vehicles – must
yield to oncoming traffic
29. 10/23/2012
29
Case A– No Control
• Rare? – Not really ‐ Iowa
• Minimum sight triangle sides = distance traveled in 3• Minimum sight triangle sides = distance traveled in 3
seconds (design or actual?) = 2 seconds for P/R and 1
second to actuate brake/accel.
• Assumes vehicles slow ~ 50% of midblock running
speed
57
Case A– No Control
• Prefer appropriate SSD on both approaches
(minimum really)(minimum really)
• Provided on lightly traveled roadways
• Provide control if sight triangle not available
• Assumes vehicle on the left yields to vehicle on the
right if they arrive at same time
58
32. 10/23/2012
32
63
da = 220 feet
Large
Tree
b = 72’
Example
25 mph
db
a = 47’
45 mph
b
d
64
45 mph
ddaa = 220 feet= 220 feet
ddbb = a __= a __ddaa__ =__ = 47’ (220’)47’ (220’) == 69.9’69.9’
ddaa –– b 220’b 220’ –– 72’72’
da
33. 10/23/2012
33
65
db = 69.9 feet
corresponds to 15
mph
Large
Tree
b = 72’
Example
25 mph
db
a = 47’
45 mph
b
d
66
45 mph
25 mph > 15 mph, stopping sight25 mph > 15 mph, stopping sight
distance is not sufficient fordistance is not sufficient for
25 mph25 mph
da
34. 10/23/2012
34
Case B – Stop Control
Three Sub Cases – Maneuvers
• Turn left on to major roadway (clear traffic left enter• Turn left on to major roadway (clear traffic left, enter
traffic right)
• Turn right on to major roadway (enter traffic from
left)
• Crossing (clear traffic left/right)
67
Case B – Stop Control
• Need ISD for departure and completion even if p p
vehicle comes into view at point of departure = 1.47
Vmajor * tg where tg=7.5‐11.5s; add more for grade
or multilane; decrease by 1s for right turns
68
or multilane; decrease by 1s. for right turns
36. 10/23/2012
36
Case C ‐ Yield Control
• Minor Roadway Yields – must be able to see
left/right – adjust speed – possibly stop
• Sight distance exceeds that on stop control• Sight distance exceeds that on stop control
• Similar to no‐control
71
Case C ‐ Yield Control
• Must use minimum stopping sight distances
for da and db rather than values from Table 7.7
(page 251, Garber and Hoel)(page 251, Garber and Hoel)
• SSD calculation should include effect of grade
• Required distance = P/R + stop
72
37. 10/23/2012
37
Case C ‐ Yield Control
• Typically Known – a, b
• Typically Assume Va or Vb
73
Case C ‐ Yield Control
• Typically Known – a, b
• Typically Assume Va or Vb
• Similar triangle can be used to calculate safeSimilar triangle can be used to calculate safe
approach speeds (given one approach speed) or
allowable a and b.
• da/db = (da – b)/a
• db = (da *a)/ (da – b)
74
38. 10/23/2012
38
db
75
Critical speed is set to stopping distance dCritical speed is set to stopping distance dbb = (d= (daa *a)/ (d*a)/ (daa –– b)b)
da
Yield Control
• Case C I: Crossing maneuver from minor road
• Assumes that minor road vehicles that do not stop
decelerate to 60% of minor road speed
• Vehicle should be able to:
• Travel from decision point to intersection decelerating
to 60% of design speed
C d l th i t ti t th d
76
• Cross and clear the intersection at the same speed
41. 10/23/2012
41
db
da
81
ddbb = 82 ft to accommodate left and right turns= 82 ft to accommodate left and right turns
da : similar to da for stopda : similar to da for stop--controlled but increasecontrolled but increase
time gaps by 0.5 sectime gaps by 0.5 sec
da:
length
of major
approach
82
43. 10/23/2012
43
Sighting Rod and Target Rod
(AASHTO)
• For vertical sight
distance with verticaldistance with vertical
curves
• Sighting rod‐ 3.5 feet
tall
• Target rod‐ 4.25 feet tall
(Top portion and
b f
Sighting
Rod
85
bottom 2 feet are
painted orange) Target Rod
Measuring at an Uncontrolled
Intersection
Assistant
Obstruction
X
86
Observer
Decision
Point
Obstruction
Y