Today it's very common for companies to design global websites and applications. This means people with many different cultural backgrounds will use your product. How can we as designers & consultants take care of people's needs & goals and business goals when creating something for a global, cultural diverse audience like e.g. China and the US ? What do we need to consider if we do not have the resources to do a detailed user research for all the cultural diverse user groups? We will take a look at Hofstede's theory about cultural dimensions which could be applied to elements in User Interface Design and which can serve as a starting point and a rough guideline when we design for people with very different cultural backgrounds.
1. or: know who you’re targeting.
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Intercultural
Aspects of
Interface Design
2. *PS Name’s got a history
Hello, I'm Stefanie of The Geekettez
[gi:kettz]* :)
We’re a design studio for digital
products & a UX Team of 2
Stefanie Kegel Jennifer Moss
Berlin & Mannheim
Stalking here:
@thegeekettez
@guerillagirl_
@missmoss
3. Introduction to Hofstedes’ Dimensions
Example / Key Takeaways
The role of culture in product design & strategy
What we cover
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
4. The role of culture in product design
& strategy
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
01
5. Todays challenges
We create products for a global diverse
audience, so:
1. Products should attract people with very
different backgrounds.
2. Products need to be understood by those
people
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
6. Todays challenges
To design for a cross cultural experience
means we need a basic understanding
of culture / social & societal psychology
and avoid stereotypical thinking – or at
least be aware of it if we do so.
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
7. What makes a successful product?
Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum – why high-tech
products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity
10. Robbins, Stephanie S. and Stylianou, Antonis C., "Reflections of Culture in Global Corporate Web
Sites" (2000). AMCIS 2000 Proceedings. Paper 278.
http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2000/278
What is culture?
Culture can be defined as a shared set of
values that influence societal perceptions,
attitudes, preferences, and
responses.“
„
12. Culture shapes what we feel attracted &
connected to
Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum – why high-tech
products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity
13. Culture takes an effect on….
…what catches our attention
…how we look for information
…what seems important / not that important to us
…what seems trustworthy/shady to us
…our purchase decisions
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
14. Introduction to Geert Hofstedes’
cultural dimensions
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
02
15. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
1.Power Distance Index (PDI, high vs low)
2.Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
3.Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
4.Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI, high vs low)
5.Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
6.Indulgance vs Restraint (we will not cover this)
16. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
https://geert-hofstede.com/united-states.html
Example: Hofstedes dimensions USA vs Germany vs Russia
17. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
1.Power Distance Index (PDI, high vs low)
2.Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
3.Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
4.Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI, high vs low)
5.Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
6.Indulgance vs Restraint (we will not cover this)
18. Power Distance Index (PDI) - High vs low
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Expresses the attitude and acceptance of
the culture concerning inequalities and
authority among individuals.
19. Power Distance Index (PDI) - High vs low
Distribution of Power distance according to Hofstede. Red marked countries ranked higher in Power distance, which
means society have accepted a certain hierarchy order Green/yellow marked countries are ranked lower in PD and
prefer more flatter hierarchies Source: http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=45061
20. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
1.Power Distance Index (PDI, high vs low)
2.Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
3.Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
4.Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI, high vs low)
5.Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
6.Indulgance vs Restraint (we will not cover this)
21. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
The ‚I‘ vs ‚We‘ dimension in terms of the self-image.
Self image as individual versus self image as group
member
Do I prefer to focus on ‚myself’, decide for myself or should
I care more about my in-group than myself?
It is about autonomy and personal freedom vs. cohesive
groups and loyalty.
22. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
Distribution of individualism vs collectivism according to Hofstede. Red marked countries are more individualist.
Green/yellow marked countries are more collectivist. Source: http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?
reportId=9826
23. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
1.Power Distance Index (PDI, high vs low)
2.Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
3.Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
4.Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI, high vs low)
5.Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
6.Indulgance vs Restraint (we will not cover this)
24. Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS Index)
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Is the society more masculine or feminine oriented?
Masculine societies are more competitive, success and
goal/achievement driven than feminine societies,
which value cooperation, modesty, taking care of the
weak individuals etc.
25. Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS Index)
Distribution of masculinity vs femininity according to Hofstede. Red marked countries are more masculine
Green/yellow marked countries are more feminine. Source: http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?
reportId=35509
26. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
1.Power Distance Index (PDI, high vs low)
2.Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
3.Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
4.Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI, high vs low)
5.Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
6.Indulgance vs Restraint (we will not cover this)
27. Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI, high vs low)
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
How do people of a society deal with uncertainty/
ambiguity of possible future risks? How do people
handle the fact that they can not control the future?
Are we open to new ideas or do we prefer the familiar
over the unfamiliar?
28. Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI, high vs low)
Distribution of UAI according to Hofstede. Red marked countries have a high UAI score. Orange
medium & yellow countries (e.g China) have a low UAI score Source: http://www.targetmap.com/
viewer.aspx?reportId=35503 and https://geert-hofstede.com/china.html
29. Dimensions of culture
(Hofstede, 1980)
1.Power Distance Index (PDI, high vs low)
2.Individualism vs Collectivism (IDV)
3.Masculinity vs Femininity (MAS)
4.Uncertainty Avoidance (UAI, high vs low)
5.Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
6.Indulgance vs Restraint (we will not cover this)
30. Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Long termed goals like working hard for the future
(or: live for the future, future-orientated) vs. short
termed goals like quick results (live in the moment)
31. Distribution of LTO according to Hofstede. Red marked countries have a high LTO score. Orange &
yellow medium & green (USA) have a low LTO score. Source: http://www.targetmap.com/
viewer.aspx?reportId=6691
Long Term vs Short Term Orientation (LTO)
32. Example & Takeaway: Individualism
vs Collectivism
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
03
33. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Which kind of messages could be important for the
individualist culture that is predominant in the USA?
What kind of messages are more appealing to collectivist
cultures like China?
34. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
The ‚I‘ vs ‚We‘ dimension in terms of the self-image.
Self image as individual versus self image as group
member
Do I prefer to focus on ‚myself’, decide for myself or should
I care more about my in-group than myself?
It is about autonomy and personal freedom vs. cohesive
groups and loyalty.
35. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
Example: Pfizer Inc., German site: „Me“ not „We“
http://www.pfizer.de/
„Me“ not „We“ approach
„Read her
story“Identification
Individual approach in
imagery and content
36. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
Pfizer: Chinese site: „We“ rather than „Me“
http://www.pfizer.com.cn/(S(rqsopb55n5t2ie455oqdruuo))/index_en.aspx (04, 2016)
„We“ not „Me“ approach
Focus on the in-group
37. Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV vs COL)
Pfizer: Korean site: „We“ rather than „Me“
http://www.pfizer.co.kr/ (04, 2016)
„We“ not „Me“ approach
38. Key Takeaways
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
If you want your digital product to succeed in terms of engagement and
conversion you should consider cognitive cultural differences and keep
them in mind to start building your design „hypothesis“ on it – because
people with different cultural backgrounds will perceive your messages –
like imagery, tone of voice and content strategy – differently and this will
have an influence on their behaviour and decisions.
39. Key Takeaways
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Hofstedes dimensions can serve as a starting point for
this challenge.
Thank you!
40. Further reading
Katharina Reinecke, Sonja Schenkel, Abraham Bernstein, "Modeling a User's Culture. In: The Handbook of
Research in Culturally-Aware Information Technology: Perspectives and Models ", IGI Global, 2010
http://people.seas.harvard.edu/~reinecke/Publications_files/ModelingAUsersCulture.pdf
The Hofstede Centre. Strategy, Culture, Change
https://geert-hofstede.com
Barber, W., and Badre, A., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Culturability: The Merger of Culture and Usability
http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/att4/proceedings/barber/
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Colors in culture: http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/colours-in-cultures/
41. References
World map : http://www.vecteezy.com/map-vector/50156-9-stylish-vector-world-map-vector
Desireable Product: Cooper, A. (2004). The inmates are running the asylum – why high-tech
products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity
Colors in culture: http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/colours-in-cultures/
Images
Articles &
Papers
The Hofstede Centre. Strategy, Culture, Change
https://geert-hofstede.com
The Geekettez. Design Studio and User Experience Consultancy. Mannheim & Berlin
Barber, W., and Badre, A., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
Culturability: The Merger of Culture and Usability
http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/hfweb/att4/proceedings/barber/
Nisbett, Richard E. The geography of thought, 2003