social relation approach of gender analysis

1. Haramaya University
College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences
Department of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension
(Msc. Program)
Group Assignment ;-Gender Analysis and Planning Course
Topic;- Social Relations Approach
Haramaya, Ethiopia
December, 2019

2. Group-4
By;
Name ID
1.Abiyot Abayneh SGS/0320/12
2.Awil Abdii SGS/1060/12
3.Mohammed Aliye SGS/0333/12
4.Feyisa Gutema SGS/1147/12
5.Tizita Tefera SGS/0341/12
6.Tamam Abdurhman SGS/0322/12
7.Nadia Abduselam ------------------

3. presentation Outline
Introduction
Aims of the framework
Definition of terms and concepts
Aspects of social relations
Commentary on social relation approach

4. Introduction
 The Social Relations Approach (SRA) to gender and development
planning has been developed by Naila Kabeer ,
 It has been used by government departments and NGOs for
planning programmes in a number of countries. The thinking has a
socialist feminist background.
Key elements of the approach are:
 the goal of development as human well-being;
 the concept of social relations;
 institutional analysis.

5. Aims of the framework
 The SRA is intended for existing gender inequalities in the
distribution of resources, responsibilities, and power, for
designing policies and programmers.
 The framework uses concepts rather than tools to concentrate on
the relationships between people and their relationship to
resources and activities.
• As a method of analyzing existing gender inequalities
– In the distribution of resources, responsibilities, and power,
– For designing policies and programmes which enable women to
be agents of their own development.

6. Aims of the framework….
The framework uses concepts rather than tools to concentrate on the
relationships between people and their relationship to resources
and activities, How these re-worked through 'institutions‘
Kabeer states that a narrow application of the Social Relations
Approach,
• examining a particular institution, will highlight how gender
inequality is,
• formed and reproduced in individual institutions
 A broader application, focusing on a number of institutions in a
given context

7. Main concepts of the framework
Concept 1:
Development as increasing human well-being
In the Social Relations Approach
• Development is primarily about increasing human well-being.
• It is not simply about economic growth or improved productivity.
• Human well-being is seen as concerning survival, security, and
autonomy,
• Development interventions must be assessed not only in terms of
technical efficiency, but also in terms of how well they contribute
to the broader goals of survival, security, and human dignity.

8. Development as increasing human well-
being……….
• The concept of production does not just include market
production but all the activities which contribute to human well-
being
• Including all those tasks which people perform to reproduce
human labour(caring, nurturing, looking after the sick),
• Those which poor people carry out to survive; and those which
people perform in caring for their environment which ultimately
assures their livelihoods.

9. Cont……
Kabeer uses the term 'social relations' to describe the
structural relationships that create and reproduce
systemic differences in the positioning of different
groups of people.
• Social relations produce cross-cutting inequalities, which
ascribe each individual a position in the structure and
hierarchy of their society.
• Gender relations are one type of social relations
(sometimes known as the social relations of gender).
Others include those of class, race, ethnicity, and so on.
• Social relations change; they are not fixed or immutable.
Changes at the macro level can bring about change in
social relations.
Concept 2: Social relations

10. Cont……
• Social relations also determine what tangible and
intangible resources are available to groups and
individuals.
• Poverty arises out of people's unequal social relations,
which dictate unequal relations to resources, claims, and
responsibilities.
• Simply put, people don't start at the same point in the
social system, Poor people in general, and poor women
in particular, are often excluded from formal allocations
of resources,
• so they draw on other resources - determined by their
social relations, which play a critical part in their
survival strategies.
Social relations….

11. • The underlying causes of gender inequality are not
confined to the household and family
• It reproduced across a range of institutions, including
the international community, the state, and the market
place
• Kabeer defines an institution as a framework of rules
for achieving certain social or economic goals.
• Institutions ensure the production, reinforcement,
and reproduction of social relation, hereby create and
perpetuate social difference and social inequality.
• Organizations, defined as the specific structural
forms that institutions take (North 1990, quoted in
Kabeer 1994).
Concept 3: Institutional analysis

12. institutional analysis….
Example of Social Relations Concept 3: Institutional analysis
Key institutional locations Organizational/structural form
State Legal, military, administrative organisations
Market Firms, financial corporations, farming
enterprises, multinationals, and so on
Community Village tribunals, voluntary associations,
informal networks, patron-client relationships,
NGOs
Family/kinship Household, extended families, lineage
groupings, and soon
 Gender-awareness requires us to analyses how these institutions
actually create and reproduce inequalities.
 Kabeer suggests that four key institutional locations, for
analytical purposes,
=>The state, the market, the community, and family kinship.

13. Aspects of social relations shared by institutions
• Kabeer states that institutions differ in many ways;
• for example, they vary in different cultures.
• However, she emphasizes that they do have some
common aspects.
• The Social Relations Approach states that all institutions
possess five distinct,
• but inter-related, dimensions of social relationships:
rules, resources, people, activities, and power.

14. Aspects of social relations shared by institutions….
• These dimensions are significant to the analysis of social
inequality in general, and gender inequality in particular.
• Examining institutions on the basis of their rules,
practices, people, distribution of resources, and their
authority and control structures,
helps you understand who does what, who gains, who
loses (which men and which women).
 This is called undertaking an institutional analysis

15. Five aspects of social relations shared by institutions
1. Rules: how things get done;
• These may be official (written down) and unofficial
(expressed through norms, values, laws, traditions, and
customs).
• What rules do is to allow or constrain the following:
• what is done;
• how it is done;
• by whom it will be done;
• who will benefit.
• Rules allow in everyday activities that decisions to be
made with the minimum of effort.

16. Five aspects of social relations shared by
institutions…...
2. Activities: what is done?
• Institutions do things; they try to achieve goals by
following their own rules.
• These activities can be productive, distributive, or
regulative.
It is important to ask the following questions about activities:
 who does what?
 who gets what?
 who can claim what?

17. Five aspects of social relations shared by
institutions…...
3. Resources: what is used, what is produced?
 Institutions also mobilize and distribute resources.
 Thus, in societies where women are required to
contribute to family food provisions,
they are more likely to enjoy independent access to land
and other resources.

18. Five aspects of social relations shared by
institutions…...
4. People: who is in, who is out, who does what?
Institutions deal with people and are selective about:
who they allow in and whom they exclude;
who is assigned various resources, tasks, and
responsibilities;
who is positioned where in the hierarchy.
 This selection reflects class, gender, and other social
inequalities.

19. Five aspects of social relations shared by
institutions…...
5. Power: who decides, and whose interests are served
 Institutions embody relations of authority and control.
 Few institutions are egalitarian, even if they profess to be so.
 The unequal distribution of resources and responsibilities,
ensures that some institutional actors have authority and
control over others.
 These individuals then promote practices which entrench
their privileged position, and they are most likely to resist
change.

20. Concept 4: Institutional gender policies
 Naila Kabeer classifies policies into three types, depending
on the degree to which they recognize and address gender
issues
 Gender-blind policies:
These recognize no distinction between the sexes.
Policies incorporate biases in favor of existing gender relations
and therefore tend to exclude women.
 Gender-aware policies:
These recognize that women as well as men are development
actors,
They are constrained in different, often unequal, ways as
potential participants and beneficiaries in the development
process.
They may consequently have differing and sometimes
conflicting needs, interests, and priorities.

21. Institutional gender policies ….
 Gender-aware policies can be further sub-divided into three policy types.
1.Gender-neutral policy approaches
• Use the knowledge of gender differences in a given society to overcome biases
in development interventions, Aim to ensure that interventions target and
benefit both sexes effectively to meet their practical gender needs.
2.Gender-neutral policies
• Work within the existing gender division of resources and responsibilities.
• Gender-specific policies use the knowledge of gender differences in a given
context to respond to the practical gender needs of either women or men
• They also work within the existing gender division of resources and
responsibilities
3.Gender-redistributive policies
• Interventions which intend to transform existing distributions to create a more
balanced relationship between women and men. They may target both women
and men, or only one group specifically.
• Gender-redistributive policies touch on strategic gender interests;
• They may work on women's practical gender needs, but do so in ways which
have transformatory potential

22. • Gender-blind policies(often implicitly male-biased)
Gender-sensitive policies
• Gender-neutral Gender-specific
Rethinking Assumption
Rethinking Practice
(interventions intended
to leave distribution of
resources and responsibilities
intact)
Gender-redistributive
(interventions intended
to meet targeted needs of
one or other gender within
resources and
responsibilities)
(interventions intended to
transform existing
distributions in a more
egalitarian direction)
Institutional gender policies ….

23. Concept 5: Immediate, underlying and structural causes
 In analyzing a situation in order to plan an intervention, This framework
explores
 Immediate ,underlying, and
 structural factors which cause the problems, and their effects on the various
actors involved.
Example of Social Relations Concept 5: Causes and effects
Long term effect
Intermediate effect
Immediate effect
The Core problem
Immediate cause
-household level, community level,market,state level
Intermediate cause
-household level
-community level, market level ,state level
Structural cause
-household level, market level ,state level

24. Concept 6: Causes and effects analysis
• This analysis was used to spell out the consequences of this
exclusion for their survival and wellbeing.
• Kabeer and Subrahmanian first carried out an institutional
analysis of the causes and effects of reduced access to credit,
• using Concepts 3 and 5 of the Social Relations Approach.
• This tool helps you decide how an intervention can effectively
address the issues uncovered in the institutional analysis.
• It makes you consider what you want to achieve, how you will
do it, and how you will know whether you have achieved it.

25. Commentary on social relation approach
Uses
Useful for many purposes, and at many levels
The Social Relations Approach can be used for many purposes,
 including project planning and policy development.
 It can also be used at many levels, even at the international level.
Raises awareness of the importance of institutional analysis and
can be used in training
 enables an organization to translate an analysis into action.
Gives a holistic analysis of poverty
 Highlights interactions between various forms of
iniqualities:gender,class,race.
 The framework concentrates on structural analysis, material poverty,
marginalization, and powerlessness, and how those have evolved.
 Sees poverty as not just material deprivation. But also social
marginalization.

26. Commentary on social relation approach….
Aims to place gender at the centre of an entirely new framework
for development theory and practice,
 Conceptualizes gender as a central to development thinking.
Concentrates on institutions
 Offers a way of understanding how various institutions inter-relate.
 Centers analysis around inistitutions:highlights the political aspects
of the institutions.
Dyanamic:tries to uncover process of improvishment and
empowerment.
Highlights gender relations and emphasizes women's and men's
different interests and needs’
 connectedness of men and women through their social relationships,
as well as the ways in which these affect them differently, as separate
groups.

27. Commentary on social relation approach….
Potential limitations
Emphasizes structure rather than agency
Gender may become subsumed in a complex examination of cross
cutting inequalities, posing an obstacle for political action,
 Since it examines all cross-cutting issues of iniqualities,gender can
get subsumed under other analytical categories.
Complexity may intimidate
 The Social Relations Approach Can appear
complecated,detailed and demanding
 The institutional analysis can be performed using three rather than
five categories: rules, practices, and power (which is manifested
through
the rules and practices
 Difficult to use with communities in a participatory way
 Difficulty in determining what is an institution

28. Thank you so much
for your attention!!!