Dr Timbilfou KIENDREBEOGO, Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Researches (INEAR), Department of Livestock Productions (DLP), Non Ruminants Program (NRP), Burkina Faso (Member of the ULP ColeACP consortium: Mango waste for feed )

1. Use of production and transformation waste of mangosUse of production and transformation waste of mangos
for food of poultry in Burkina Faso (West Africa)for food of poultry in Burkina Faso (West Africa)
Dr Timbilfou KIENDREBEOGODr Timbilfou KIENDREBEOGO
Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Researches (INEAR)Institute of Environmental and Agricultural Researches (INEAR)
Department of Livestock Productions (DLP)Department of Livestock Productions (DLP)
Non Ruminants Program (NRP)Non Ruminants Program (NRP)
Burkina FasoBurkina Faso

2. PlanPlan
I.I. IntroductionIntroduction
II.II. Material and MethodsMaterial and Methods
III.III. Results and DuscussionsResults and Duscussions

3. INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION

4. INTRODUCTION (1/8)INTRODUCTION (1/8)
In Burkina Faso, the pig breeding is in significant numeric growth,In Burkina Faso, the pig breeding is in significant numeric growth,
PPoultry farming is in full rise in Burkina Faso. With a manpoweroultry farming is in full rise in Burkina Faso. With a manpower
estimated in 2013 at more than 39 million heads, the die getsestimated in 2013 at more than 39 million heads, the die gets
annually more than 10 billion FCFA to the rural householdsannually more than 10 billion FCFA to the rural households
(MRAH, 2013)(MRAH, 2013)
The contribution of local poultry farming in consumption is ofThe contribution of local poultry farming in consumption is of
13 chickens by household whose average size is of 6,3 people13 chickens by household whose average size is of 6,3 people
(KONDOMBO, 2007).(KONDOMBO, 2007).

5.  However, the productivity of local hen remains low (Ouattara,However, the productivity of local hen remains low (Ouattara,
2008).One records a rate of grows annual of 3%, a weight2008).One records a rate of grows annual of 3%, a weight
carcass from 0,8 to 1 kg (MRA, 2007) and an annual laying ofcarcass from 0,8 to 1 kg (MRA, 2007) and an annual laying of
27 eggs per hen (MRA, 2004);27 eggs per hen (MRA, 2004);
 Various accused constraints explain this weakness and preventVarious accused constraints explain this weakness and prevent
a good development of the breeding of the poultry:a good development of the breeding of the poultry:
INTRODUCTION (2/8)INTRODUCTION (2/8)

6.  Bad conditions of breeding,Bad conditions of breeding, Low technicality of the producersLow technicality of the producers
and the insufficiency of care.and the insufficiency of care.
 Low availability and the expensive cost of food;Low availability and the expensive cost of food; Indeed, theIndeed, the
insufficiency and the dearness of the ingredients entering theinsufficiency and the dearness of the ingredients entering the
composition of the diets intended for the poultry) slow downcomposition of the diets intended for the poultry) slow down
considerably the development of poultry farming (Sanon, 2009;considerably the development of poultry farming (Sanon, 2009;
Coulibaly, 2013)Coulibaly, 2013)
INTRODUCTION (3/8)INTRODUCTION (3/8)

7. INTRODUCTION (4/8)INTRODUCTION (4/8)
Nutritional contraints of local poultry in Burkina FasoNutritional contraints of local poultry in Burkina Faso
Classe of <30 chickens ≥ 30≤50 chickens ≥ 50 chickens
Researching solutions, we thought that use of Mangos wasteResearching solutions, we thought that use of Mangos waste
can contibute to solve this containtcan contibute to solve this containt

8.  According to FAO, the potential production of fresh mangos ofAccording to FAO, the potential production of fresh mangos of
Africa was 810 000 tons in 2010,Africa was 810 000 tons in 2010,
 Only since 2004, the various actors of mangos die of West AfricaOnly since 2004, the various actors of mangos die of West Africa
must face the appearance and with the fast propagation of themust face the appearance and with the fast propagation of the
fruit flies whosefruit flies whose Bactrocera invadensBactrocera invadens is most devastating;is most devastating;
 It infests the orchards and causes losses of production going ofIt infests the orchards and causes losses of production going of
10% at the beginning of country side, to 40%, in medium of10% at the beginning of country side, to 40%, in medium of
countryside, and reached even 80%, at the end of the campaigncountryside, and reached even 80%, at the end of the campaign
for the late varieties such has Brooksfor the late varieties such has Brooks..
INTRODUCTION (5/8)INTRODUCTION (5/8)

9.  Moreover, great quantities (20-40% of volumes transformed)Moreover, great quantities (20-40% of volumes transformed)
of waste of transformation (skin, core and pulp) rejected intoof waste of transformation (skin, core and pulp) rejected into
nature are developed little, apart from the weak taking awaynature are developed little, apart from the weak taking away
by the animals and the stockbreeders.by the animals and the stockbreeders. This waste given up inThis waste given up in
nature is on the other hand potential sources of pollution ofnature is on the other hand potential sources of pollution of
the environment and framework of life of the borderingthe environment and framework of life of the bordering
populationspopulations
INTRODUCTION (6/8)INTRODUCTION (6/8)

10. INTRODUCTION (6/8)INTRODUCTION (6/8)

11.  Paradoxically, the livestock productions in West AfricaParadoxically, the livestock productions in West Africa
encounter constraints of which most crucial is the food. Thisencounter constraints of which most crucial is the food. This
constraint is explained amongst other things by the lowconstraint is explained amongst other things by the low
availability and the dearness of conventional food intended foravailability and the dearness of conventional food intended for
the animals.the animals.
 This situation poses the need for seeking solutions ofThis situation poses the need for seeking solutions of
transformation/conservation of the mango scrap for theirtransformation/conservation of the mango scrap for their
valorization in the food of the livestockvalorization in the food of the livestock
INTRODUCTION (7/8)INTRODUCTION (7/8)

12. MATERIAL AND METHODSMATERIAL AND METHODS

13. MATERIAL AND METHODS (1/5 )MATERIAL AND METHODS (1/5 )
LocalityLocality : Bobo-Dioulasso and: Bobo-Dioulasso and
ToussianaToussiana
-ClimateClimate: Soudano-guinean: Soudano-guinean
-PluviometryPluviometry : 900-1200 mm/an: 900-1200 mm/an
-TemperatureTemperature : 25-32 °C: 25-32 °C
Locality of the studyLocality of the study
Farako-
bâ
N
Légende :
: Limite
département
: Satation de Farako-bâ

14.  We developed two things based on drying and theWe developed two things based on drying and the
mechanics: (i) A process of production of food containingmechanics: (i) A process of production of food containing
mango’s scrap and (ii) Manufacture of a mango Crusher-mango’s scrap and (ii) Manufacture of a mango Crusher-
Screening machineScreening machine
 My institute undertook to protect these two technologies. TheMy institute undertook to protect these two technologies. The
contract has been just awarded to an office council and fromcontract has been just awarded to an office council and from
now to the end September we will be located. This is why Inow to the end September we will be located. This is why I
cannot say some to you more.cannot say some to you more.
 On the other hand I can speak to you about the use of foodOn the other hand I can speak to you about the use of food
produced containing mango scrap in hen rationing of localproduced containing mango scrap in hen rationing of local
race.race.
MATERIAL AND METHODS (2/6 )MATERIAL AND METHODS (2/6 )

15. Compoments
Mango food with
miwe bran
Mango food with
rice bran
DM (%) 92,42 92,79
CP (%) 9,08 6,95
BC (%) 14,44 13,86
Calcium (%) 1,93 1,6
Phosphore (%) 0,42 0,38
Sodium (%) 0,41 0,3
DE (Kcal/Kg MS) 1880,64 1650,9
MATERIAL AND METHODS (3/5 )MATERIAL AND METHODS (3/5 )

16. MATERIAL AND METHODS (4/5 )MATERIAL AND METHODS (4/5 )
Diets compositionDiets composition
Ingrédients CT (%) T1 (%) T2 (%)
Mangos food with rice bran 46,246,2 00 00
Mangos food with maize bran -- 51,251,2
Maize 2424 23,523,5 4848
Ban -- 34,734,7
Cake of soya bean 11,211,2 7,27,2 77
Poudre coquilles d'huîtres 22 22 22
Fish pouder 55 55 55
Vegetable oil 8,258,25 7,87,8 --
NaCl 0,30,3 0,30,3 0,30,3
Methionine 0,50,5 0,50,5 0,50,5
Lysine 0,50,5 0,50,5 0,50,5
CMV 2,02,0 22 22

17. MATERIAL AND METHODS (5/5 )MATERIAL AND METHODS (5/5 )

18. RESULTSRESULTS

19. RESULTS (1/4)RESULTS (1/4)
Nutritionnal composition and cost of the dietsNutritionnal composition and cost of the diets
IngrédientsIngrédients T1T1 T2T2 CTCT
DE (Kcal/kg)DE (Kcal/kg) 2 9032 903 2 9012 901 2 9982 998
ME (Kcal)ME (Kcal) 2 7572 757 2 7562 756 2 8482 848
Crude protein (%)Crude protein (%) 14,0214,02 14,5914,59 14,3814,38
Lysine (%)Lysine (%) 0,830,83 0,960,96 0,890,89
Methionine (%)Methionine (%) 0,650,65 0,680,68 0,690,69
Calcium (%)Calcium (%) 1,161,16 1,151,15 1,091,09
Phosphore. (%)Phosphore. (%) 0,310,31 0,310,31 0,290,29
CB (%)CB (%) 5,555,55 4,884,88 4,544,54
Cost (FCFA/kgMS)Cost (FCFA/kgMS) 244,5244,5 214,9214,9 221,0221,0

20. RESULTS (2/4)RESULTS (2/4)
Traitments N initial Weight (g) final weight(g)
T1 2222 773±141773±141aa
1061±101061±10aa
T2 2727 840±137840±137aa
1188±1551188±155bb
CT 2121 820±136820±136aa
1208±2061208±206bb
Rations N DWG (g) VC (g) IC FCkgV(FCFA)
T1 22 6,86±2,326,86±2,32aa
61,56±3,6061,56±3,60aa
9,96±3,209,96±3,20bb
2409±7802409±780bb
T2 27 8,29±2,668,29±2,66abab
71,96±2,7671,96±2,76bb
9,56±2,989,56±2,98bb
2058±6412058±641abab
CT 21 9,24±3,269,24±3,26bb
62,3962,39aa
7,67±2,857,67±2,85aa
1696±6301696±630aa

21.  The results make it possible to conclude that T2 showsThe results make it possible to conclude that T2 shows
performances of growth almost equal to those of ration CT.performances of growth almost equal to those of ration CT.
Although the performances of the T1are lower than those ofAlthough the performances of the T1are lower than those of
rations T2 and CT, the equality of the IC of the two experimental T1rations T2 and CT, the equality of the IC of the two experimental T1
and T2 means that they are developed on the same level byand T2 means that they are developed on the same level by
chickens, and in comparison with possible substitution partial ofchickens, and in comparison with possible substitution partial of
corn (around 25%) by the mangos food andcorn (around 25%) by the mangos food and
RESULTSRESULTS (3/4)(3/4)

22.  of possible recovery of great quantities of mango waste, we canof possible recovery of great quantities of mango waste, we can
show the checking from the assumption according to which theshow the checking from the assumption according to which the
recourse to nonconventional food containing mango scraprecourse to nonconventional food containing mango scrap
makes it possible to make more available of food for chickensmakes it possible to make more available of food for chickens
RESULTS (4/4RESULTS (4/4

23. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVESCONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES

24. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES (2/3)CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES (2/3)

25. CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES (2/3)CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES (2/3)

26.  This Work made it possible to show with the farmers the possibilityThis Work made it possible to show with the farmers the possibility
of resorting to nonconventional food such as mangos for betterof resorting to nonconventional food such as mangos for better
producing,producing,
 Use of byproducts of mangos is a way to solve food constraint andUse of byproducts of mangos is a way to solve food constraint and
add value to mangos and breedings chainsadd value to mangos and breedings chains
 The use of produced food at base mangos waste contributed toThe use of produced food at base mangos waste contributed to
lower the costslower the costs
CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES (3/3)CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES (3/3)

27. Thank You for your Attention
Thank You for your Attention