Open Science is perfectly adapted to support the basic needs for impact in a "Publish or Perish" reality, so why is community uptake low? With inertia on numerous advocacy and e-infrastructure initiatives funded by EC and national funders in the ERA, the cultural barriers and discipline-specific behaviour are becoming the bottle neck. The presentation focuses on how to get the right mix of advocacy and infrastructure development, in order to support long-term implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to Scientific Knowledge (Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6).

1. Advocacy
e-­‐Infrastructures
Ivo
Grigorov,
DTU
AQUA
@EUROBASIN
Project
Manager
EGI
Community
Forum,
Helsinki,
20
May
2014
Mixing
it
right
&
Open
Science

2. EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

3. 1
Advocacy
for
Open
Science
What
did
we
do
wrong
?
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

4. *scepVcal,
suspicious
&
scienVfic
Who
is
the
target
audience?
Homo
SSSapiens*
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

5. Administrator
ScienVst
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu
So,
what
are
the
consequences
for
advocacy?

6. 2And
why
is
this
relevant
to
to
e-­‐Infrastructures
?
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

7. Because
advocacy
and
infrastructures
must
have
a
clear
WHY,
the
HOW
comes
second
…
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

8. Source:
Bryn
Nelson
2009,
Data
Sharing:
Empty
Archives,
Nature
461,
160-­‐163
(2009)
…
or
we
risk
this:
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

9. HOW
DO
«MARINE
USERS»
USE
e-­‐INFRASTRUCTURE
?
3EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

10. “Research
Cycle”
adapted
from
Tenopir
C,
Allard
S,
Douglass
K,
Aydinoglu
AU,
et
al.
(2011)
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
h"p://www.plosone.org/ar0cle/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
IDEA
&
PROPOSAL
TESTS
DATA
MODEL
CODE
ARTICLES
Idealised
Research
Lifecycle
Open
Notebook
Science
DOI
OpenAIRE
DOI
GitHub
DOI
REF
IMPACT

11. We
archive
data
at
generaVon
…
and
(hopefully)
publish
as
peer-­‐reviewed
data
products
&
reanalysis
in
a
number
of
journals
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

12. 90
%
of
publicaXons
are
Open
Access
(vs
20-­‐40%
avrg.)
SOCIAL
MEDIA
ATTENTION

13. Source: Personal Trials 2009-2011
using Google Scholar
…
among
“OCEAN
ACIDIFICATION”
&
“GEO-­‐ENGINEERING”
publicaVons
…
2008
2009
2010
visible
on
Google
Scholar
<40%

14. WHERE
next
?
4EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

15. FUNDERS:
NaXonal
&
EC
Academic
Staff
Today`s
Graduate
Student
ScienXst
of
Tomorrow
Project
Managers
INSTITUTIONS
Knowledge
Managers
Join
the
experiment:
www.fosteropenscience.eu
@fosterscience
#fosteropenscience
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

16. #OpenScience
feeds
the
need
for
impact
in
a
“Publish
or
Perish”
reality
…
…
so
we
have
to
make
openness
part
of
REF*
credit
!
*Research
Excellence
Frameworks
measuring
research
performance
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

17. Thank you
for the invitation & your attention!
Join the Open Science experiment at
www.fosteropenscience.eu
@ fosterscience
# fosteropenscience
ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
EGI Community Forum, Helsinki, 20 May 2014 www.fosteropenscience.eu

18. FP7
FOSTER
(Science
in
Society)
DuaraVon:
2014-­‐2015
(24
months)
Eloy
Rodrigues,
Un.
Minho
FOSTER
Coordinator
eloy@sdum.uminho.pt
Petr
Knoth,
Open
University
Research
Associate
WP3
Leader
e-­‐Learning
Placorm
Iryna
Kuchma,
eIFL
WP4
Leader
Training
iryna.kuchma@eifl.net
Ivo
Grigorov,
DTU
Aqua
FP7
Project
Manager,
WP2
Lead
Content
&
ValidaXon
ivgr@aqua.dtu.dk
Birgit
Schmidt,
Un.
Goehngen
FP7
OpenAIRE
Project
Officer
&
WP5
Leader
Networking
bschmidt@sub.uni-­‐goehngen.de
Jose
Carvalho,
Un.
Minho
FOSTER
Project
Manager
jcarvalho@sdum.uminho.pt