Policy Coherence & the 2030 Agenda Building on the PCD experience
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
1 gefällt mir•755 views
Policy Coherence & the 2030 Agenda Building on the PCD experience James Mackie, Martin Ronceray & Eunike Spierings EU PCD Focal Points meeting – Brussels, 22 February 2017
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (16)
Andere mochten auch
Andere mochten auch (9)
Ähnlich wie Policy Coherence & the 2030 Agenda Building on the PCD experience
Ähnlich wie Policy Coherence & the 2030 Agenda Building on the PCD experience (20)
Mehr von European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM)
Mehr von European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Policy Coherence & the 2030 Agenda Building on the PCD experience
- 1. Policy Coherence & the 2030 Agenda Building on the PCD experience James Mackie, Martin Ronceray & Eunike Spierings EU PCD Focal Points meeting – Brussels, 22 February 2017
- 2. Content / outline here 1. Objectives of paper 2. Approaches to integrated policy making 3. Creating a PCSD system 4. Recommendations
- 3. 1. Objectives of the paper
- 4. • On-going dialogue with a number of European PCD focal points Transition to the 2030 Agenda • Understand nature of PCSD • See how it differs from PCD • Can we build on the PCD experience for working with PCSD? 1. Objectives of paper
- 5. 2. Approaches to integrated policy making
- 6. 2. Approaches to integrated policy making Identified 4 different approaches 1. PCD tradition: Policy coherence for development • Other policies should not undermine core policy / Unidirectional 2. Issue-based mainstreaming • Integrate specific concern in core policy / Unidirectional 3. Multi-sector approaches: nexus approach – SDGs have similar approach • Address concerns of several sectors simultaneously / Multi-directional 4. Collective Responsibility: cabinet responsibility, whole-of-government • Unified strategy to which all ministers adhere / Multi-directional
- 7. 2. Analysed how they worked against 8 criteria • Rationale • Problem Definition • Goal • Direction of coherence • Mechanisms • Legal and policy statements • Coherence promoting system • Implementing Authority • Impact • Monitoring and evaluation • Constraints and challenges PCD tradition was well developed with more tools than others; system idea important; some similar tools were used in different approaches
- 8. 3. Creating a PCSD system
- 9. 3. Creating a PCSD system • Analysis of what tools might be useful for PCSD • Table with Summary of lessons for PCSD – using same 8 criteria Some examples • Coherence promotion system • PCD ‘champions’ or ‘policy entrepreneurs’ has worked well could extend this to PCSD: Multiple champions working as a group • Focus on a limited number of issues - lesson from Nexus + PCD • Implementing Authority • All approaches: need for clear authority at appropriate level for leadership, to encourage synergies and adjudicate on trade-offs • Monitoring and evaluation • Lessons from PCD useful: impact assessments, peer reviews, PCD Reports, dialogues with different actors and independent scrutiny
- 11. 4. Recommendations • Both PCD and PCSD matter • Delegate PCSD to sectoral advocates – multiple sector champions • Make PCSD your own – importance of political commitment, pay attention to political economy for different actors and to incentives • Build a PCSD System with interdependent parts • Framework – legal / policy statements – clear locus of authority • Mechanisms – group of champions, consultations systems, etc. • Knowledge systems – analysis, monitoring • Accountability – peer review, reporting, independent scrutiny • Communicate on the added value of PCSD – principle needs support
- 12. Thank you! jm@ecdpm.org www.ecdpm.org European Centre for Development Policy Management