SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
2D:4D Digit Ratio and Autism Severity in Boys
                                                                                                   Green, C., Dissanayake, C., Loesch, D.Z.
                                                                                          Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Australia

Background
It has been suggested that the digit ratio of the 2nd to 4th fingers (2D:4D) may be
negatively correlated with prenatal testosterone. Digit ratio can be viewed as an
index of testosterone level by the 14th week of pregnancy1, with a low 2D:4D                                                                                                                               Table 3
indicating longer 4th digits relative to 2nd digits. The lower the 2D:4D ratio, the
higher the prenatal testosterone level. In general, males have a low 2D:4D while
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Differences in 2D:4D Ratios between Participants with ASD compared to
females have a higher 2D:4D, indicating a negative correlation between digit ratio
                                                                                                                                                                                                           those with AD
and prenatal testosterone levels.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            95% CI
Many studies have reported that prenatal levels of testosterone correlate with                                                                                                                               Classification
autistic traits during infancy and early childhood2-5, as well as with language                                                                                                                                                               n            M (SD)                    t (df)              P             LL            UL   Cohen’s d
                                                                                                                                                                                                                Cut-Offs
development6. Children with AD have been reported to have lower 2D:4D than                                                                                                                                 SA            ASD                 15        0.934 (0.02)               0.36 (42)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      0.80         -0.020       -0.026      0.09
children with HFA/AspD. Cognitive and psychological profiles have also been related                                                                                                                                      AD                  58        0.931 (0.04)
to 2D:4D, especially measures of systemising and empathising, although the results                                                                                                                         SA + RRB      ASD                 8         0.941 (0.03)               0.64 (57)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      0.64         -0.023       0.037       0.20
have been mixed7-12.                                                                                                                                                                                                     AD                  51        0.934 (0.04)
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Severity      ASD                 8         0.939 (0.02)               0.28 (59)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      0.78         -0.025       -0.034      0.13
Inconsistencies in the literature are likely to be due to differences in measurement                                                                                                                                     AD                  53        0.935 (0.04)
method, as well as differences in operationalizing autistic traits and other variables
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Note. ASD = Participants above the ASD cut-off; AD = Participants above the AD cut-off; CI =
of interest. To date, autistic characteristics have been defined by scores on a variety                                                                                                                    Confidence Interval; LL = Lower Limit; UL = Upper Limit.
of measures, including the Autism Quotient (AQ) and the Autism Diagnostic                    Table 1
Observation Schedule (ADOS), as well as other measures thought to reflect autistic
strengths and weaknesses.                                                                    Correlations of Parental 2D:4D to Child 2D:4D                                                                 Discussion
                                                                                                                                                                                                           • This is the first study to compare 2D:4D ratio in individuals with AD and ASD as
Objectives                                                                                                                                   2D:4D Correlations                                              determined by autism severity cut-offs across ADOS modules 1-3. The revised
The objective in the current study was to compare 2D:4D ratios between boys with                                                                                                                             ADOS algorithm severity score allows for comparison amongst individuals with
an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) boys to ascertain                                     Mother                        Father                         Mother + Father           ASD, regardless of age and verbal ability.
if boys with ASD have lower 2D:4D ratios, and presumably have had higher exposure                                                                                                                          • Consistent with previous research, the data indicated a lower 2D:4D ratio amongst
                                                                                             Diagnosis         n           r        p       n         r           p            n         r           p
to prenatal testosterone. Associations between 2D:4D ratio and autism severity, as                                                                                                                           boys with an ASD, implying higher prenatal testosterone levels compared to TD
rated by the ADOS revised algorithms13, were also explored.                                  TD               35       0.269      0.12     27      -0.133        0.51         37      0.056        0.74      boys.
                                                                                                                                                                                                           • No associations were found between children’s and parents’ measurements,
                                                                                             ASD              67       -0.033     0.79     31      0.183         0.32         69      0.059        0.629     indicating that familial factors are not implicated in determining the digit ratios
Method
Participants comprised of 77 boys (4-16 years of age) with an ASD and 38 TD boys,            TD +ASD          102      0.053      0.60     58      0.118         0.34         106     0.061        0.53      studied here.
along with their parents. DSM IV diagnosis of ASD was confirmed by administration                                                                                                                          • As with many autism measurements, there was more variability in 2D:4D ratios in
of the ADOS. Measurements of the second and fourth fingers were obtained by                  Note. Mother + Father = Average 2D:4D of Mother and Father for each participant.
                                                                                                                                                                                                             the ASD group than in the TD group, possibly reflecting the increased
measuring from the metacarpophalangeal joint to the finger-tip to establish 2D:4D                                                                                                                            heterogeneity inherent in affected individuals.
ratios for all the boys and their parents. Measurements were collected as part of a                                                                                                                        References
larger, ongoing, longitudinal study; an average of 2D:4D ratios was calculated for           Table 2                                                                                                       1. Galis, F., Ten Broeck, C., Van Dongen, S., & Wijnaendts, L. (2009). Sexual Dimoprhism in the Prenatal
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 57-62.
each participant based on the number of visits each participant had completed to                                                                                                                           2. Knickmeyer, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Fetal testosterone and sex differences. Early Human
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Development, 82, 755-760.
date. In order to preserve the variability of the ASD group, outliers were adjusted          Correlation between 2D:4D and ADOS Revised Algorithm Totals and Severity                                      3. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Chapman, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Foetal
                                                                                                                                                                                                           testosterone and the child systemizing quotient. European Journal of Endocrinology, 155, 123-130.
according to the method recommended by Tabachnick and Fidell (2007)14.                                                                                                                                     4. Chapman, E., Baron-Cohen, S., Auyeung, B., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal
                                                                                             Algorithm              ADOS                                                                                   testosterone and empathy: Evidence from the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the "Reading the Mind in
                                                                                                                                             n                            r                    p           the Eyes" test. Social Neuroscience, 1(2), 135-148.
Results                                                                                      Totals                 Module                                                                                 5. Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Raggatt, P., Hackett, G., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Fetal testosterone and
                                                                                                                                                                                                           empathy. Hormones and Behavior, 49(3), 282-292.
  The 2D:4D ratio was significantly lower in boys with ASD (M = 0.931, SD = .04)                                      1                     19                           0.20                 0.41         6. Manning, J. T., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Sanders, G. (2001). The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and
                                                                                             SA                       2                     11                           0.28                 0.41         autism. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43, 160-164.
  compared to TD boys (M = 0.952, SD = 0.03), t(113) = 2.99, p = .003, d = .62, 95%                                                                                                                        7. van Honk, J., Schutter, D., Bos, P., Kruijt, A., Lentjes, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Testosterone
                                                                                                                      3                     34                           0.04                 0.81         administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio.
  CI = [0.01, 0.04] (Figure 1)                                                                                                                                                                             Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (8), 3448-3452.
                                                                                                                      1                     19                           0.00                 0.99         8. Putz, D., Gaulin, S., Sporter, R., & McBurney, D. (2004). Sex hormones and finger length: What does
  The 2D:4D ratios of the mothers of boys with ASD (M = 0.958, SD = 0.04) and TD             RRB                      2                     11                          -0.00                 0.99         2D:4D indicate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 182-199.
  (M = 0.962, SD = 0.04) and fathers of boys with ASD (M = 0.945, SD =0.03) and TD                                    3                     34                           0.00                 0.99
                                                                                                                                                                                                           9. Voracek, M., & Dressler, S. (2006). Lack of correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and Baron-Cohen’s
                                                                                                                                                                                                           “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test, empathy, systemising, and autism-spectrum quotients in a
  (M = 0.955, SD = 0.03) did not differ significantly between, or within, groups.                                     1                     19                           0.15                 0.53         general population sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1481-1491.
                                                                                                                                                                                                           10. von Horn, A., Bäckman, L., Davidsson, T., & Hansen, S. (2010). Empathizing, systemizing and finger
   Parental measures of 2D:4D did not correlate with child measures of 2D:4D                 SA + RRB                 2                     11                           0.20                 0.55         length ratio in a Swedish sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 31–37.
                                                                                                                                                                                                           11. Manning, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Fink, B. (2010) Is digit ratio (2D:4D) related to
  (Table 1)                                                                                                           3                     34                           0.04                 0.83         systemizing and empathizing? Evidence from direct finger measurements reported in the BBC internet
                                                                                                                                                                                                           survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 767-771.
  There were no significant correlations between 2D:4D and autism severity, nor                                                                                                                            12. Valla, J., & Ceci, S. (2011). Can sex differences be tied to the long reach of prenatal hormones?
  between 2D:4D and algorithm totals (Table 2)                                               Severity                1-3                    64                          0.09                  0.46         Brain organization theory, digit ratio (2D/4D), and sex differences in preferences and cognition.
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 134-146.
  There were no significant differences between AD and ASD groups on 2D:4D                                                                                                                                 13. Gotham, K., Pickles, A., & Lord, C. (2009). Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39 (5), 693-705.
  ratios (as determined by the different ADOS algorithm classifications) (Table 3)           Note. SA = Social Affect; RRB = Restricted Repetitive Behaviours.
                                                                                                                                                                                                           14. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Pearson International
                                                                                                                                                                                                           Edition.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Empfohlen

AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Applitools
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at WorkGetSmarter
 

Empfohlen (20)

AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
 
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
12 Ways to Increase Your Influence at Work
 
ChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slidesChatGPT webinar slides
ChatGPT webinar slides
 
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike RoutesMore than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
More than Just Lines on a Map: Best Practices for U.S Bike Routes
 

2D:4D Digit Ratio and Autism Severity in Boys (IMFAR 2011)

  • 1. 2D:4D Digit Ratio and Autism Severity in Boys Green, C., Dissanayake, C., Loesch, D.Z. Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Australia Background It has been suggested that the digit ratio of the 2nd to 4th fingers (2D:4D) may be negatively correlated with prenatal testosterone. Digit ratio can be viewed as an index of testosterone level by the 14th week of pregnancy1, with a low 2D:4D Table 3 indicating longer 4th digits relative to 2nd digits. The lower the 2D:4D ratio, the higher the prenatal testosterone level. In general, males have a low 2D:4D while Differences in 2D:4D Ratios between Participants with ASD compared to females have a higher 2D:4D, indicating a negative correlation between digit ratio those with AD and prenatal testosterone levels. 95% CI Many studies have reported that prenatal levels of testosterone correlate with Classification autistic traits during infancy and early childhood2-5, as well as with language n M (SD) t (df) P LL UL Cohen’s d Cut-Offs development6. Children with AD have been reported to have lower 2D:4D than SA ASD 15 0.934 (0.02) 0.36 (42) 0.80 -0.020 -0.026 0.09 children with HFA/AspD. Cognitive and psychological profiles have also been related AD 58 0.931 (0.04) to 2D:4D, especially measures of systemising and empathising, although the results SA + RRB ASD 8 0.941 (0.03) 0.64 (57) 0.64 -0.023 0.037 0.20 have been mixed7-12. AD 51 0.934 (0.04) Severity ASD 8 0.939 (0.02) 0.28 (59) 0.78 -0.025 -0.034 0.13 Inconsistencies in the literature are likely to be due to differences in measurement AD 53 0.935 (0.04) method, as well as differences in operationalizing autistic traits and other variables Note. ASD = Participants above the ASD cut-off; AD = Participants above the AD cut-off; CI = of interest. To date, autistic characteristics have been defined by scores on a variety Confidence Interval; LL = Lower Limit; UL = Upper Limit. of measures, including the Autism Quotient (AQ) and the Autism Diagnostic Table 1 Observation Schedule (ADOS), as well as other measures thought to reflect autistic strengths and weaknesses. Correlations of Parental 2D:4D to Child 2D:4D Discussion • This is the first study to compare 2D:4D ratio in individuals with AD and ASD as Objectives 2D:4D Correlations determined by autism severity cut-offs across ADOS modules 1-3. The revised The objective in the current study was to compare 2D:4D ratios between boys with ADOS algorithm severity score allows for comparison amongst individuals with an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and typically developing (TD) boys to ascertain Mother Father Mother + Father ASD, regardless of age and verbal ability. if boys with ASD have lower 2D:4D ratios, and presumably have had higher exposure • Consistent with previous research, the data indicated a lower 2D:4D ratio amongst Diagnosis n r p n r p n r p to prenatal testosterone. Associations between 2D:4D ratio and autism severity, as boys with an ASD, implying higher prenatal testosterone levels compared to TD rated by the ADOS revised algorithms13, were also explored. TD 35 0.269 0.12 27 -0.133 0.51 37 0.056 0.74 boys. • No associations were found between children’s and parents’ measurements, ASD 67 -0.033 0.79 31 0.183 0.32 69 0.059 0.629 indicating that familial factors are not implicated in determining the digit ratios Method Participants comprised of 77 boys (4-16 years of age) with an ASD and 38 TD boys, TD +ASD 102 0.053 0.60 58 0.118 0.34 106 0.061 0.53 studied here. along with their parents. DSM IV diagnosis of ASD was confirmed by administration • As with many autism measurements, there was more variability in 2D:4D ratios in of the ADOS. Measurements of the second and fourth fingers were obtained by Note. Mother + Father = Average 2D:4D of Mother and Father for each participant. the ASD group than in the TD group, possibly reflecting the increased measuring from the metacarpophalangeal joint to the finger-tip to establish 2D:4D heterogeneity inherent in affected individuals. ratios for all the boys and their parents. Measurements were collected as part of a References larger, ongoing, longitudinal study; an average of 2D:4D ratios was calculated for Table 2 1. Galis, F., Ten Broeck, C., Van Dongen, S., & Wijnaendts, L. (2009). Sexual Dimoprhism in the Prenatal Ratio (2D:4D). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 57-62. each participant based on the number of visits each participant had completed to 2. Knickmeyer, R., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Fetal testosterone and sex differences. Early Human Development, 82, 755-760. date. In order to preserve the variability of the ASD group, outliers were adjusted Correlation between 2D:4D and ADOS Revised Algorithm Totals and Severity 3. Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Chapman, E., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Foetal testosterone and the child systemizing quotient. European Journal of Endocrinology, 155, 123-130. according to the method recommended by Tabachnick and Fidell (2007)14. 4. Chapman, E., Baron-Cohen, S., Auyeung, B., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal Algorithm ADOS testosterone and empathy: Evidence from the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the "Reading the Mind in n r p the Eyes" test. Social Neuroscience, 1(2), 135-148. Results Totals Module 5. Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., Raggatt, P., Hackett, G., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy. Hormones and Behavior, 49(3), 282-292. The 2D:4D ratio was significantly lower in boys with ASD (M = 0.931, SD = .04) 1 19 0.20 0.41 6. Manning, J. T., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Sanders, G. (2001). The 2nd to 4th digit ratio and SA 2 11 0.28 0.41 autism. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 43, 160-164. compared to TD boys (M = 0.952, SD = 0.03), t(113) = 2.99, p = .003, d = .62, 95% 7. van Honk, J., Schutter, D., Bos, P., Kruijt, A., Lentjes, E., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Testosterone 3 34 0.04 0.81 administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. CI = [0.01, 0.04] (Figure 1) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108 (8), 3448-3452. 1 19 0.00 0.99 8. Putz, D., Gaulin, S., Sporter, R., & McBurney, D. (2004). Sex hormones and finger length: What does The 2D:4D ratios of the mothers of boys with ASD (M = 0.958, SD = 0.04) and TD RRB 2 11 -0.00 0.99 2D:4D indicate? Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 182-199. (M = 0.962, SD = 0.04) and fathers of boys with ASD (M = 0.945, SD =0.03) and TD 3 34 0.00 0.99 9. Voracek, M., & Dressler, S. (2006). Lack of correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and Baron-Cohen’s “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test, empathy, systemising, and autism-spectrum quotients in a (M = 0.955, SD = 0.03) did not differ significantly between, or within, groups. 1 19 0.15 0.53 general population sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1481-1491. 10. von Horn, A., Bäckman, L., Davidsson, T., & Hansen, S. (2010). Empathizing, systemizing and finger Parental measures of 2D:4D did not correlate with child measures of 2D:4D SA + RRB 2 11 0.20 0.55 length ratio in a Swedish sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 31–37. 11. Manning, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Fink, B. (2010) Is digit ratio (2D:4D) related to (Table 1) 3 34 0.04 0.83 systemizing and empathizing? Evidence from direct finger measurements reported in the BBC internet survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 767-771. There were no significant correlations between 2D:4D and autism severity, nor 12. Valla, J., & Ceci, S. (2011). Can sex differences be tied to the long reach of prenatal hormones? between 2D:4D and algorithm totals (Table 2) Severity 1-3 64 0.09 0.46 Brain organization theory, digit ratio (2D/4D), and sex differences in preferences and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 134-146. There were no significant differences between AD and ASD groups on 2D:4D 13. Gotham, K., Pickles, A., & Lord, C. (2009). Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39 (5), 693-705. ratios (as determined by the different ADOS algorithm classifications) (Table 3) Note. SA = Social Affect; RRB = Restricted Repetitive Behaviours. 14. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Pearson International Edition.