The document discusses how biological systems evolve complex gene interactions and networks in response to environmental pressures, rather than being engineered like machines, using examples from neuroscience research on fruit flies, squid, and fish to illustrate how neural systems respond to stimuli in variable and adaptive ways. It also examines theories of how biological systems achieve robustness through degeneracy and maintain behavioral variability through multiple learning systems that balance exploitation and exploration.
5. How Stable Are Gene Interactions? Phenotypeofthetemperature sensitive Syntaxin-1A (Syx1A) mutant: Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin, http://brembs.net 5 % standing time 39°C 25°C van Swinderen & Greenspan (2005)
6. Screening forsyxSuppressors Isolating mutants extending the time standing at 39°C over Syx1A Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie. http://brembs.net 6 Syx- + % standing Syx-Sup + + time at 39°C van Swinderen & Greenspan (2005)
7. Quantifying Gene Interactions In thewildtypebackground… Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Biologie - Neurobiologie. http://brembs.net 7 expected observed Sup1Sup2 + + Sup1Sup2 + + …and in theSyx-background Syx- + % standing Syx- + time at 39°C van Swinderen & Greenspan (2005)
8. A Gene Interaction Matrix The genematrix in WT background 8 The genematrix in Syx-background previous interaction positive interaction missing interaction negative interaction reversed sign new interaction
9.
10. Octopamine and Insect Flight OA isthe relevant amine Flies without OA fly well Flies withblocked TA receptorsfly well Flies without OA and TA do notfly well Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin, http://brembs.net 10 Brembs et al. (2007)
29. Drosophila Turning 13.07.2010 Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin 29 Behavioralvariability in a constantstimulussituation: Actions, not responses
30. Drosophila Turning 13.07.2010 Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin 30 Behavioralvariability in a constantstimulussituation: Actions, not responses
31. Choice or Noise? Decisionsor just noise in complexstimulus-responsesystems?
32. Choice or Noise? 13.07.2010 Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin 32 Maye et al. (2007) PLoSOne Geometric Random Inner Products: GRIP
33. Choice or Noise? 13.07.2010 Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin 33 correlation nonlinearity Maye et al. (2007) PLoSOne Nonlinear (choice) Linear/stochastic (noise)
34. Choice or Noise? Maye et al. (2007) PLoSOne 13.07.2010 Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin 34
35. Choice or Noise? Nonlineardecision-makingsystem underlies spontaneity in flies
44. Action - Outcome Evaluation Brembs & Plendl (2008) CurrentBiology rut-AC dependentSynapticPlasticity Protein Kinase C world self 13.07.2010 Björn Brembs, Freie Universität Berlin 44
45. Conservation PKC but not rut-AC involved in Aplysiaself-learning Aplysiacalifornica F. Lorenzetti, D. Baxter, J. Byrne (2008): Neuron 59, 815-828
60. The Default Mode Network The limitingfactor in theevolutionofbrainsize was energysupply 60
61. The Default Mode Network The limitingfactor in theevolutionofbrainsize was energysupply 61 The additional energyburdenassociatedwith […] theenvironmentmaybeaslittleas .5-1.0% ofthe total energybudget. Marcus Raichle (2006): Science314, p1249
80. Cathy RankinAplysiaconditioning: Fred Lorenzetti Riccardo Mozzachiodi VuHyun Elizabeth Wilkinson Fredy Reyes Jack Byrne Aplysiaimaging: Quentin Gaudry William Kristan Fly spontaneity: Alexander Maye ZacHsieh George Sugihara Fly aggression: Britta Wittek Andrea Baier Ed Kravitz Fly attention: Bruno van Swinderen