Presentation at the March 2013 dialogue workshop of the Biosciences for Farming in Africa media fellowship programme in Accra, Ghana.
Please see www.sti4d.com/b4fa for more information
B4FA 2013 Ghana: Cassava mosaic disease resistance - Paul Asare
1. Characterization and screening for
Cassava mosaic disease
(CMD)resistance
Paul. A. Asare (Ph.D)
Department of Crop Science
U. C. C
2. Outline of presentation
• Introduction
• Objective
• Materials and method
• Results
• Conclusion
• Some breeding work at UCC
3. Introduction
• Cassava (Manihot esculenta)
– Is one of the world’s most important tropical plants
– The fifth source of carbohydrate in the tropics
• Contributes 22% of the total Agriculture Gross
Domestic Product (AgGDP) (Parkes 2009)
• It is also a source of income for most rural
dwellers.
4. CMD is an important
constraint to cassava
production in Africa
(Geddes, 1990; Zhou et al.,
1997; Huiping et al., 2010).
Estimated total crop yield
losses due to CMD on the
continent amounts to about
US $440 million per annum
(Thresh et al., 1997).
5. Objectives of the study
• The objectives of the study were:
– to characterize the various accessions using
morphological descriptors and molecular
markers.
– to screen for mosaic resistant accessions.
6. Materials and methods
• Forty three (43) different cassava plants (accessions)
were used
• Land preparation
– A portion of land, at the School of Agriculture Teaching and
Research farm, was cleared, ploughed and harrowed
• Planting of cassava accessions
– Single row planting method of 1m x 1m length was used.
– Ten cuttings for each accession.
7. Morphological Characterization
• The accessions were first characterized base on
morphological descriptors (IITA, 1990).
• Both qualitative and quantitative data were
taken on shoot and root morphology
• Data collection started six weeks after planting
through to 12 months after planting (MAP).
8. Molecular Characterization
–Molecular characterization
• DNA extraction was done using the CTAB
protocol I (Murray and Thompson 1990).
• DNA quality and quantitation was done
using spectrophotometer.
• DNA was stored at -20oC.
9. Molecular Characterization cont’d
• PCR Amplification
– PCR amplification was carried out using 36 pairs
of cassava SSR primers
– hPAGE was used
– Documentation
– 20 SSR primers that produced clear bands were
used for the analysis
10. Fig. 1 Distribution of first leaf colour in cassava germplasm
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Light green Dark green Green purple Purple
PercentageFrequency
Colour of first leaf
Results
11. Figure 2: Distribution of petiole colour in cassava germplasm.
Light green Dark green Green purple Purple
Petiole colour
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
PercentageFrequency
12. Figure 3: Distribution of petiole length in cassava germplasm.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
5-14 15-24 >25
PercentageFrequency
Petiole lenght (cm)
13. Figure 4: Distribution of stem colour in cassava germplasm.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Silver green Light brown/orange Dark brown
PercentageFrequency
Stem colour
14. Figure 5: Distribution of root surface colour in cassava germplasm.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
White/Cream Light brown Dark brown
PercentageFrequency
Root surface colour
15. Figure 6: Distribution of storage root pulp colour in cassava germplasm.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
White Yellow
PercentageFrequency
Storage root pulp colour
32. Marker Assisted Selection
• Laboratory screening.
– Six (6) pairs of CMD diagnostic primers were
used to check for the various strains of the
virus
– Four (4) pairs of primers associated with
resistant (CMD2 gene) to the virus were used.
33. Lab. Screening…cont’d
• PCR amplification
Table 2: Nucleotide sequences of DNA primers used in polymerase
chain reaction for the detection of cassava mosaic begomovirus
Harrison et al. (1997) and that of Zhou et al. (1997)
CMD2 markers were SSRY28, NS156, NS169 and RME1
(Akano et al., 2002; Fregene et al., 2001 )
Virus Name of primer Sequence (5’ to 3’)
ACMV ACMV-F1 (P1)
ACMV-R1
ACMV-F2 (P2)
ACMV-R2
ACMV-AL1/F (P3)
ACMV-ARO/R
ACMV-1 (P3)
ACMV-2
TTC AGT TAT CAG GGC TCG TAA
GAG TG AAG TTG ACT CAT GA
GTG AGAAAG ACA TTC TTG GC
CCT GCAATT ATA TAG TGG CC
GCG GAA TCC CTAACA TAA TC
GCT CGT ATG TAT CCT CTA AGG CCT
GCTC AAC TGG AGA CAC ACT TG
CCT GCAACA TAC TTA CGC TT
EACMV/EACMV UV-AL3/F (P5)
UV-AL1/F1
TAC ACA TGC CTC RAA TCC TG
CTC CGC CAC AAA CTT ACG TT
EACMV-Ug UV-AL1/F1 (P6)
ACMV-CP/R3
TGT CTT CTG GGA CTT GTG TG
TGC CTC CTG ATG ATT ATA TGTC
34. NoneCAPEVARS
P4ADEHYE
P1NKABOM
ADW053
OFF063
P1 & P4
AFS041
OFF023
P1 & P3
P1, P2 & P4DMA002
AFS136
KW181
P2 & P4
P2, P3 & P4UCC470
UCC517
ADW051
ADW063
KW085
OFF058
OFF093
OFF146
P1 P2 & P4
OFF086
OFF136
P1, P3 & P4
NN42
NN43
OFF019
OFF025
OFF029
OFF145
OHYEOKA
UCC153
UCC506
ADW004
AFS001
AFS027
AFS048
AFS126
AFS131
ASAMAN
B.BOTAN
BESEREBEMA
DMA066
KW001
KW070
KW148
KW161
P1, P2, P3 & P4
0.000.050.100.150.200.250.30
Figure 3: Dendrogram showing 43 cassava accessions reaction patterns with four mosaic primers as determined by the unweighted pair
group method with arithmetic averages of binary character matrices using the similarity coefficient index (Nei, 1983)
35. Conclusion
• The 43 cassava accessions used were genetically
variable and clustered into groups not necessarily
based on the source of collection.
• Molecular markers were more efficient in
distinguishing the 43 accessions into 9 clusters,
compared to morphological markers, which
grouped them into 4 clusters
• The only CMG strain responsible for the disease
symptoms in the study area was ACMV.
36. Conclusion cont’d
This study identified
only one genotype
(Capevars) as
resistant to the
cassava mosaic
disease CMD.
37. Some plant breeding work at UCC
• Cassava germplasm collection – Central & Western
Regions
– 516 accessions from 23 districts
– Through conventional breeding 2 varieties were released
to farmers
• Characterization of water yam accessions using both
morphological and molecular techniques.
• Molecular characterization of Ghanaian Avocado pear
• Screening work
– Striga resistance in cowpea
– Drought resistance in cowpea
– Drought resistance and ‘stay green’ trait in sorghum
– Blight tolerance/resistance in taro