1. Youth and community
work in emancipatory
interconnections of
marginalised young
people with museums
Ioannis Athanasiou
6 July 2017
2. Working title
Museum education for
development and social
justice: Exploring young
peopleâs experiences of
museum spaces for
âyouth developmentâ
3. The policy context
Published by the Department for Media,
Culture and Sport in March 2016, the first
White Paper for Culture in over 50 years
emphasize the importance of increasing
access to the arts organisations for young
people from disadvantaged backgrounds and
promises meaningful engagement with their
culture and heritage (The Culture White
Paper 2016: 20, my emphasis).
4. 1st case study
âThe Stories of Becontreeâ
heritage not only as a way to develop historical
knowledge of young people or form new
territories of interpretation, but also as a catalyst
for identity work and social change
5. How museums define social
exclusion and inclusion in youth
work development?
6. Museums attracted visits from schools located in
areas with some of the highest levels of deprivation in
England and where child poverty was highest
measured by the percentage of pupils eligible for free
school meals (Hooper-Greenhill et al. 2009).
7. âyouth were considered at risk if they
lived in rural communities where
resources were scarce, were children
of colour, were impoverished, came
from single-parent homes, or were
young girls â all young people cut off
from access to the so-called
âAmerican Dreamââ
8. an âunderlying perception of youth
deficiency reinforced by the demand of
museums to measure and demonstrate
social impactâ under the pressure of
funding (Tsibazi 2013)
9. What does the underlying perception of cultural
deficit in museumsâ work with young people
mean for museum and education professionals?
How do discourses of âriskâ influence museum
cultures of learning, participation and social
justice?
How can museums evolve into spaces of change
for one of the most underrepresented museum
audiences?
10. The impact of risk society on
youth identity formations and
professional museum practices is
better analysed on the
contradictory and risky ground of
young people being simultaneously
âconsumersâ and potential
âproblemsâ individuals (Powell
2014, original emphasis); or more
accurately being designated both
âat riskâ and âas riskâ by public and
institutional discourses (Nichols
2017).
13. âthe emotions and sensory skills
are hardly utilised or encouraged in
academic, textually based
education [an approach to social
issues through the arts] encourages
a sense of place, new modes or
perception and enhancement of
older and taken-for-granted
modes, teaches new skills and
promotes often high impact but
non-verbal means of
communication and consciousness
raisingâ (Clammer 2015:124).
14. âour ideas about âotherâ people could be âquestioned in
between locations, at the frontiers of traditional
disciplinary boundaries, and beyond the confines of
institutional spacesâ (Golding 2009:2, original emphasis)
At the museum frontiers âŠ
15. âąâŻ Youth and community work as emancipatory museum
practice moves away from a conception of youth work
development as primarily an economic phenomenon to
understanding it as a socio-cultural one âto be
measured in terms of quality of life, self-reliance,
cultural viability and vitality, human freedom, civil and
social justice and equality of opportunity for health,
growth and creativityâ (Murphy 1999).
âąâŻ It can develop young peopleâs awareness of a reality, in
which âimagination and conjecture about a different
world than the one of oppression are as necessary to the
praxis of historical 'subjects' (agents) in the process of
transforming realityâ (Freire 1994:39).