SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 1
Assessment results indicate that participants found the structure and content of the
workshop valuable to work involving research data. The learning outcomes of the
DataDay workshop resulted in several benefits within the organization. Immediately
following the workshop and in the 3-month follow-up, participants reported many
positive outcomes compared to the pre-assessment, including increased knowledge,
confidence, skills, and awareness around research data issues and resources.
We believe that involving potential trainees in the design process of the workshop helped
meet the training needs of the organization while increasing participants’ engagement in
and receptivity to training.
Survey results revealed that participants were:
• 35% more likely to report that they understand the basic stages of the research
data lifecycle immediately after participating in the DataDay Workshop
• 31% more likely to report understanding the stages of the research data lifecycle 3
months after the workshop than before the training
• 35% more likely to report feeling confident in their ability to assist researchers with
their data immediately after the workshop
• 30% more likely to report feeling confident in their ability to assist researchers with
their data 3 months after the workshop than prior to the training
Participants reported a number of learning outcomes from the workshop in the 3-
month follow-up survey. When asked to list the most important thing that they
learned in the workshop, participants listed the following most frequently:
Understanding models for creating services with an awareness of what others in
the region are already doing (40%)
Identifying researcher needs in departments with which they liaise (25%)
Developing practical strategies for offering research data support to researchers in
the immediate future (25%)
DataDay: Participant-driven training for library research data services
Megan Bresnahan
Science & Engineering Librarian
Andrew Johnson
Research Data & Metadata Librarian
Introduction
Workshop Design
Outcomes & Conclusions
Participant Input in Training Design
Overall indicator of training need for survey topics
Preferred training formats (# of responses)
Exercise 1: -Identify researcher needs in each stage
of data lifecycle
-Brainstorm library roles based on these
needs
Exercise 2: -Examine actual data sets
-Come up with advice for researcher that
produced data
-Identify resources for these researchers
-Compare/contrast this experience with
a “traditional” reference question
Exercise 3: -Develop an outreach tool for marketing
data services to faculty
Exercise 4: -Apply workshop content to a five-
minute paper on a novel situation
(request for help with a data
management plan)
Preliminary Workshop Assessment Results
POST-PRE-
What do you imagine your role will be in supporting
researchers with their data?
Future Directions
Contact Information
Many libraries interested in offering research data services must train current personnel
to engage in new roles and to extend existing services to research data. Even libraries
with dedicated positions and/or technical infrastructure for research data management
and curation may find greater success if others within the organization understand these
new efforts and can incorporate relevant aspects into their duties.
At the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder), local demand for training around
research data issues emerged from a broader assessment of training needs for subject
librarians. This assessment involved potential trainees in the identification of areas of
training need as well as in the design of training opportunities. The results of the
assessment led to the development of a hands-on workshop on research data services.
In the summer of 2012, we distributed a survey to all subject librarians at CU-Boulder.
This instrument was designed to assess the training needs of subject librarians related to a
number of emerging and established roles for librarians in areas like scholarly
communication and research data. Specifically, questions attempted to identify levels of
anxiety and knowledge, as well as perceived professional relevance, associated with each
topic.
The results of this needs assessment revealed that subject librarians reported high levels
of anxiety and lack of knowledge associated with the survey topics related to research
data. Taking all factors into account (e.g., anxiety, knowledge, relevance), we created an
overall indicator of training need for each survey topic. As shown below, a comparison of
these indicators suggested that training for research data topics should be prioritized.
Strongly Agree
Strongly Disagree
In response to the training needs assessment results, we developed an interactive workshop called DataDay that allowed
participants to explore strategies for meeting research data needs through their reference work and liaison activities with
researchers on campus. Participants examined potential library roles in research data support and applied skills associated with
familiar and existing liaison duties to research data services. The workshop incorporated hands-on exercises with panel
presentations and informal discussions, and participants also received a print handout with tips, resources, and tools.
Participants were also asked to indicate preferences for training formats. Participants
reported a strong desire for practical training around research data topics. As shown
below, participants preferred formats such as one-day workshops, panel presentations,
print handouts, and informal discussions.
Workshop Learning Goals
Participants will be able to:
Articulate basic stages of the data lifecycle
Define the library’s potential role in research
data services
Apply skills from workshop to novel data
situations
Develop customized outreach plans for
promoting new services to their departments
Feel comfortable discussing the issues
associated with new research data services
Effectively engage with researchers when
advocating for how the library can support
their research
Assessment Tools
Several assessment tools were used to evaluate
the effectiveness of the DataDay workshop:
Pre-Workshop Survey
Post-Workshop Survey
5-Minute Paper Exercise (participants were
asked to apply skills from the workshop to a
novel situation)
3-Month Follow-up Survey
Survey results for knowledge and confidence
DataDay Workshop: December 11, 2012
We plan to analyze the workshop assessment results in greater depth, including a
detailed content analysis of survey and 5-minute paper responses, in order to further
evaluate the effectiveness of the workshop and to identify areas in need of additional
training for CU-Boulder subject librarians. We will also conduct another broad training
needs assessment as part of the iterative process of helping those librarians who work
most closely with researchers develop the knowledge and skills necessary to provide
support for research data.
Megan Bresnahan
Science & Engineering Librarian
(303) 492-4679
megan.bresnahan@colorado.edu
Andrew Johnson
Research Data & Metadata Librarian
(303) 492-6102
andrew.m.johnson@colorado.edu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...
RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...
RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service Experiences
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service ExperiencesRDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service Experiences
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service ExperiencesASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...
RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...
RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...
RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...
RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)
RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)
RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...
RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...
RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in Practice
RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in PracticeRDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in Practice
RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in PracticeASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...
RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...
RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...
RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...
RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge Broker
RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge BrokerRDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge Broker
RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge BrokerASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research Data
RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research DataRDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research Data
RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research DataASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide Collaboration
RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide CollaborationRDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide Collaboration
RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide CollaborationASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...
RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...
RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...
RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...
RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...ASIS&T
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...
RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...
RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...ASIS&T
 

Mehr von ASIS&T (20)

RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...
RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...
RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...
 
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service Experiences
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service ExperiencesRDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service Experiences
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service Experiences
 
RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...
RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...
RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...
 
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...
RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...
 
RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...
RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...
RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...
 
RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)
RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)
RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...
RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...
RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in Practice
RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in PracticeRDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in Practice
RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in Practice
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...
RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...
RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...
RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...
RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge Broker
RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge BrokerRDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge Broker
RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge Broker
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...
RDAP 16 Lightning: An Open Science Framework for Solving Institutional Challe...
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...
RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository Sys...
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research Data
RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research DataRDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research Data
RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research Data
 
RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide Collaboration
RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide CollaborationRDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide Collaboration
RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide Collaboration
 
RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...
RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...
RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...
 
RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...
RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...
RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...
 
RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...
RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...
RDAP 16 Poster: Librarian Research Data: Customizing the DMP Assistant for Pr...
 

Poster RDAP13 DataDay: Participant-driven training for library research data services

  • 1. Assessment results indicate that participants found the structure and content of the workshop valuable to work involving research data. The learning outcomes of the DataDay workshop resulted in several benefits within the organization. Immediately following the workshop and in the 3-month follow-up, participants reported many positive outcomes compared to the pre-assessment, including increased knowledge, confidence, skills, and awareness around research data issues and resources. We believe that involving potential trainees in the design process of the workshop helped meet the training needs of the organization while increasing participants’ engagement in and receptivity to training. Survey results revealed that participants were: • 35% more likely to report that they understand the basic stages of the research data lifecycle immediately after participating in the DataDay Workshop • 31% more likely to report understanding the stages of the research data lifecycle 3 months after the workshop than before the training • 35% more likely to report feeling confident in their ability to assist researchers with their data immediately after the workshop • 30% more likely to report feeling confident in their ability to assist researchers with their data 3 months after the workshop than prior to the training Participants reported a number of learning outcomes from the workshop in the 3- month follow-up survey. When asked to list the most important thing that they learned in the workshop, participants listed the following most frequently: Understanding models for creating services with an awareness of what others in the region are already doing (40%) Identifying researcher needs in departments with which they liaise (25%) Developing practical strategies for offering research data support to researchers in the immediate future (25%) DataDay: Participant-driven training for library research data services Megan Bresnahan Science & Engineering Librarian Andrew Johnson Research Data & Metadata Librarian Introduction Workshop Design Outcomes & Conclusions Participant Input in Training Design Overall indicator of training need for survey topics Preferred training formats (# of responses) Exercise 1: -Identify researcher needs in each stage of data lifecycle -Brainstorm library roles based on these needs Exercise 2: -Examine actual data sets -Come up with advice for researcher that produced data -Identify resources for these researchers -Compare/contrast this experience with a “traditional” reference question Exercise 3: -Develop an outreach tool for marketing data services to faculty Exercise 4: -Apply workshop content to a five- minute paper on a novel situation (request for help with a data management plan) Preliminary Workshop Assessment Results POST-PRE- What do you imagine your role will be in supporting researchers with their data? Future Directions Contact Information Many libraries interested in offering research data services must train current personnel to engage in new roles and to extend existing services to research data. Even libraries with dedicated positions and/or technical infrastructure for research data management and curation may find greater success if others within the organization understand these new efforts and can incorporate relevant aspects into their duties. At the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-Boulder), local demand for training around research data issues emerged from a broader assessment of training needs for subject librarians. This assessment involved potential trainees in the identification of areas of training need as well as in the design of training opportunities. The results of the assessment led to the development of a hands-on workshop on research data services. In the summer of 2012, we distributed a survey to all subject librarians at CU-Boulder. This instrument was designed to assess the training needs of subject librarians related to a number of emerging and established roles for librarians in areas like scholarly communication and research data. Specifically, questions attempted to identify levels of anxiety and knowledge, as well as perceived professional relevance, associated with each topic. The results of this needs assessment revealed that subject librarians reported high levels of anxiety and lack of knowledge associated with the survey topics related to research data. Taking all factors into account (e.g., anxiety, knowledge, relevance), we created an overall indicator of training need for each survey topic. As shown below, a comparison of these indicators suggested that training for research data topics should be prioritized. Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree In response to the training needs assessment results, we developed an interactive workshop called DataDay that allowed participants to explore strategies for meeting research data needs through their reference work and liaison activities with researchers on campus. Participants examined potential library roles in research data support and applied skills associated with familiar and existing liaison duties to research data services. The workshop incorporated hands-on exercises with panel presentations and informal discussions, and participants also received a print handout with tips, resources, and tools. Participants were also asked to indicate preferences for training formats. Participants reported a strong desire for practical training around research data topics. As shown below, participants preferred formats such as one-day workshops, panel presentations, print handouts, and informal discussions. Workshop Learning Goals Participants will be able to: Articulate basic stages of the data lifecycle Define the library’s potential role in research data services Apply skills from workshop to novel data situations Develop customized outreach plans for promoting new services to their departments Feel comfortable discussing the issues associated with new research data services Effectively engage with researchers when advocating for how the library can support their research Assessment Tools Several assessment tools were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the DataDay workshop: Pre-Workshop Survey Post-Workshop Survey 5-Minute Paper Exercise (participants were asked to apply skills from the workshop to a novel situation) 3-Month Follow-up Survey Survey results for knowledge and confidence DataDay Workshop: December 11, 2012 We plan to analyze the workshop assessment results in greater depth, including a detailed content analysis of survey and 5-minute paper responses, in order to further evaluate the effectiveness of the workshop and to identify areas in need of additional training for CU-Boulder subject librarians. We will also conduct another broad training needs assessment as part of the iterative process of helping those librarians who work most closely with researchers develop the knowledge and skills necessary to provide support for research data. Megan Bresnahan Science & Engineering Librarian (303) 492-4679 megan.bresnahan@colorado.edu Andrew Johnson Research Data & Metadata Librarian (303) 492-6102 andrew.m.johnson@colorado.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License