SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 6
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Foothills Land Trust
CE Baseline Annotated Template


The baseline documentation report (BDR) provides a snap shot of the biophysical condition of a property subject to
a conservation easement and represents an agreement between the Land Trust and landowner. It serves as a
basis for monitoring compliance and to inform the enforcement process and/or defense of the CE in court. The
BDR states the purpose of the conservation easement and documents the conservation value of the property,
current land uses, biophysical conditions and potential threats at the time of securement.

1.0 BACKGROUND
The background section of the BDR provides general information on the property, landowner and individual
preparing the baseline, as well as a legal description of property and reference to the CE.

The majority of landowners are knowledgeable about their land and buildings. Maintaining strong land owner
relations is a priority stewardship goal for any land trust. Thus it is advisable to involve the landowner in the BDR.
This can be done by having the landowner participate in the field visit and/or through an interview process (See
suggested questions in Appendix 2).

    1.1. Property Name
                 •   Name of CE property (used to refer to easement by FLT)

    1.2. Property Contact
                 •   Owner name
                 •   Contact Person (if different from above)
                 •   Contact information including phone number, fax number, email and mailing address

    1.3. Baseline Prepared by
    The BDR is a component of legal defense. FLT should keep on file the resume of the volunteer or contractor
    who prepared the BDR. The BDR should include a brief statement of the qualifications of the
    volunteer/contractor who prepared the BDR such as relevant training, professional designation, and years of
    experience.
                 •   Name of individual completing baseline
                 •   Date(s) of field visit
                 •   Contact information including phone number, email and mailing address
                 •   Statement of qualifications/expertise

    1.4. Legal Description
    Refer to land titles for legal description, but also provide details for areas (zones) that are exempt from CE
    clauses and/or where permissions need to be granted from the land trust.

                 •   Legal Description (ATS) (LLD or LSD.
                 •   Area of CE (acres, hectares)
                 •   Area (acres, hectares, m3) of take-out parcels
                 •   Area descriptions (location using local landmarks, GPS waypoints (nad83).

                                           www.foothillslandtrust.org
•   Relevant title encumbrances (refer to land title)

        Appendix 1 Copy of the Land title(s) after CE is registered
        Appendix 2: Potential questions to ask landowner/land manager to inform baseline report

    1.5. Conservation Easement Reference Statement
    Refer back to the CE (may include the date CE was signed) and provide a brief history of donation of CE,
    indicate if CE is donation, split receipt, paid and/or an Ecological Gift under Environment Canada’s Ecological
    Gift Program.

                •   Provide a reference to the conservation easement agreement,
                •   Date it was signed,
                •   Description of donation/acquisition of property.

    1.6 Partnership Approach
                • Describe the link between the FLT mission statement and the land owner’s interest in placing
                    a CE on the property.
                • Attach the Letter of Intent from the landowner

2.0 PURPOSE OF CE
The purpose of the CE states the intent of the conservation easement and the common purpose of the CE from the
landowner and land trust perspectives. In this section, regional and local conservation values that the CE protects
are highlighted. There is debate around focusing the purpose on regional or local conservation values, because of
instances whereby documentation is considered either too vague or too specific in describing the purpose. Clarity
is important when describing the conservation value and a land trust needs to consider landscapes as dynamic
entities and that a CE is for perpetuity. For example, describing the purpose of a CE in protecting habitat for an
endangered species could be problematic in court if the species becomes extirpated from the region. In addition,
the language linking the CE and BDR must be consistent.

The reader of the BDR should understand the reason the landowners and land trust have entered into a CE. For
example, is there a common purpose or shared conservation values? Attaching a letter of intent from the
landowner and referring to the FLT mission statement, if appropriate, will help readers to understand the intent of
the CE.

                 Context
    2.1 Regional Context
        A regional context will be provided by highlighting the general conservation values (e.g. species at risk,
        ecological systems/landscapes of interest, Ecologically Significant Areas) of the property in relation to the
        MD of Foothills and lands adjacent and/or nearby the CE (e.g. other government or privately protected
        lands).

    2.2 Local Context
              Context
        Highlight specific natural features of the landscape, including any specific sensitive ecosystem types or
        features found on the property.

        Insert Map 1 – Surrounding context - include roads, rivers and streams, protected areas, other parcels of
        interest (as detailed in regional context)



FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template                                                                           2
3.0 Anthropogenic Features and Land Use Activities
A BDR documents the current condition of the land at the time of signing. To monitor for compliance, all
anthropogenic features occurring on the CE property will be documented. This section will be tied into the CE
restrictions and will include a list of features to be grandfathered into the CE. If a planned feature does not yet
exist on the property, it should be stated as such in the BDR. All features will be mapped and photographed to
provide clarity to the baseline and the purpose of the structures will be explained.

                 Anthropogenic
    3.1 Existing Anthropogenic features (Grandfathered into CE)
                 •   Provide a written description (include purpose of feature), map (UTM (using GPS unit) and
                     photograph (include UTM (using GPS unit) of photo, direction of photo (using compass
                     directions) and photo description) all existing human made features on the landscape.
                 •   Some features to consider based on FLT restrictions;
                             o All building structures and associated infrastructure
                             o Fences (record height and number of wire strands)
                             o Roads and Trails
                             o Soil disturbance (cleared areas)
                             o Mining (sand, rock, gravel piles)
                             o Existing oil and gas infrastructure
                             o Garbage, waste or debris sites
                             o Water systems (irrigation, troughs, wells, dugouts)
                             o Wildlife traps
                             o Areas where chemicals ( pesticides, fertilizers and herbicides) have been applied
                             o May need to consider other features as well depending on specifics of the CE
                                  and the property

        Map 2 – Anthropogenic Features- location within CE of features described above

    3.2 Land Use Activity
    To enable the land trust to assess the level of risk on a property, the BDR will describe the historic and current
    land uses on the property and on neighboring parcels. For example, are there any areas on or near the
    property that may be zoned for conflicting activities that might put the conservation values of the property at
    risk? Does the landowner have existing management plans in place to guide land management (e.g. forestry,
    grazing)? All current management plans being used by the landowner will be documented. The BDR can
    inform and guide the development of any future management plans for the property.

                 •   Describe historical (if relevant) and current land use activities for the CE and specified areas if
                     applicable.
                 •   Current zoning.
                 •   Refer to existing management plans.
                 •   Highlight land use activities on surrounding parcels.

        Appendix 3 Existing Management Plans for Property
        Appendix 4: Photo table of locations, map and photos

4.0 Natural Features
All water features should be identified by type (river, stream, pond, lake, and wetland), mapped and photographed.
Note if the water features are ephemeral or year round, direction of flow, and activities up stream that may impact
health.
FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template                                                                             3
CE clauses that refer to the health or condition of water features may be difficult to measure. The land trust needs
to develop protocols for how it will determine if this clause is in compliance.

                     Features
    4.1 Hydrological Features
                • Provide a written description, map (UTM (using GPS unit) and photograph (UTM (using GPS
                     unit), direction of photo (using compass) and photo description) all existing water features on
                     the CE.
                • Water features may include:
                               o Rivers, streams
                               o Water bodies (lakes, ponds, wetlands)
                               o Springs
    4.2 Water Quality
                • Note activities occurring on the CE that may impact water health?
                               o Wildlife / stock watering
                               o Trails / roads through water systems
                               o proximity to an agricultural field
                               o Recreational use
                               o Chemical usage
                               o Wildlife presence / absence

                •   Water sampling approaches
                           o Water samples will be taken where a stream enters and exits the property to
                              generate a baseline of water quality. Future monitoring of the effect of activities
                              will refer to the baseline.

        Map 4 – Water Features- location within CE of features described above

    4.2 Vegetation
    Vegetation communities should be documented on map, with photos and described in the BDR. In addition,
    threats to the native vegetation should be documented (e.g. invasive species).
                •   Provide a written description (include dominant species, rare and unusual flora, human –made
                    habitat), map (UTM (using GPS unit) and photograph (UTM (using GPS unit), direction of photo
                    (using compass) and photo description) all vegetation communities including natural and
                    human-made on the CE.
                •   Common types of vegetation communities include native grassland, wetland, riparian,
                    croplands, tame forage, aspen and spruce forest. (May be able to use remote sensing or
                    Alberta Vegetation Index or Alberta Plant Community Guides as a starting point).
                •   Document threats to native vegetation communities.
                •   Describe and list invasive species occurring on the CE (document larger patches on map,
                    using UTM (GPS Unit).

        Map 5 – Vegetation Communities - location within CE of features described above

    4.3 Surficial Bedrock Geology and Soils
                •   Identify surface and underlying geology
                •   Use AGRSID to determine soil series


FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template                                                                          4
Map 6 – Soil Series

4.3 Wildlife
In this section of the BDR describe important wildlife habitat (e.g. ungulate winter range, grizzly bear movement
corridor), species of interest or any other ecological values. Include in this section rare, endangered species
(including rank) that may occur on the property. This section may reply heavily on landowner knowledge, local
expert knowledge (local fish and wildlife officers, biologists) or research reports.
                  • List specific habitat occurring on the property for terrestrial or aquatic species and/or
                      species groups of interest
                  • List any important migrating species that use the property as permanent or seasonal
                      habitat or for movement opportunities for specific groups and or species?
                  • Reference other research/reports that document the importance of this area for
                      species groups and/or species.
                  • List any rare or endangered species occurring on the property. Specify rank and if
                      recovery plan is in place.

Appendix 3: Photo table of locations, map and photos

5.0 Monitoring Recommendations
A BDR should include a series of recommendations about how to monitor the property and to help inform the
management plans developed by FLT.
               • List any recommendations for future monitoring (e.g. invasive species of concern,
                   addressing threats outlined in the BDR).
               • Time of year for monitoring to occur.
               • How often monitoring should occur
               • Frequency of using certain types of field methodologies if appropriate to CE clauses or
                   existing management plan (e.g. range health, riparian health)

6.0 Owner Acknowledgement of Condition
             • Include a section for signatures, where FLT and landowners agree to the BDR as
                accurately representing the current condition of the property.
             • Date of completion.

    Appendix 1: Land Title
    Appendix 2: Landowner Interview –suggested questions to inform BDR
          a. Length of time as owner of property
          b. Existing land uses of property (also historical if different) e.g. agriculture, ranching,
              recreation and forestry)
          c. Current management regime (Are there any management plans?).
          d. Are there areas/topics you feel you would like to know more about?
          e. Discuss anthropogenic features on the landscape and purpose of features.
          f. Discuss water features on the landscape – location of features
          g. Do you have invasive species on the property (list species if possible) and discuss
              location of patches. As well as history (eg. pathways of invasion)


FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template                                                                       5
h. Are you aware of any water quality assessments on this property? Are you interested in
               learning more about water health issues?
            i. Are there areas where chemical pesticides or fertilizers have been used on the property?
               If yes, please explain why?
            j. Please list species you have seen on the property and frequency of sightings?
            k. Are there things you are concerned about from a stewardship perspective that FLT might
               be able to assist you with?

    Appendix 3: Photo Location table, map and photos (with description)

Photo #       UTM East           UTM West             Date




        Map 7 – Photograph locations




Prepared by Miistakis Institute for Foothills Land Trust

With support from Alberta Real Estate Foundation and The Calgary Foundation




Disclaimer
This Baseline Documentation Report Template was created for the Foothills Land Trust and may or may
not be appropriate for all land trust organizations. It is available for any land trust to use and to adapt for
its own purposes. Foothills Land Trust is not responsible for any results achieved or decisions made
through the use of the Baseline Documentation Report Template.

FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template                                                                      6

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Cialdea - input2012
Cialdea - input2012Cialdea - input2012
Cialdea - input2012INPUT 2012
 
Impact of policies on soil erosion in the European Union
Impact of policies on soil erosion in the European UnionImpact of policies on soil erosion in the European Union
Impact of policies on soil erosion in the European UnionExternalEvents
 
Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...
Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...
Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...Pepe
 
Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, California
Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, CaliforniaWater Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, California
Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, CaliforniaKaila694m
 
Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwater
Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwaterTopographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwater
Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwaterAlexander Decker
 
The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...
The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...
The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...IJSRED
 
PM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.b
PM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.bPM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.b
PM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.bPhilip Martinson
 
Mangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan Final
Mangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan FinalMangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan Final
Mangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan FinalIan Kissoon
 
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...QUESTJOURNAL
 
Paper2 justwan
Paper2 justwanPaper2 justwan
Paper2 justwaneisakti
 
EIA scoping report -
EIA scoping report -EIA scoping report -
EIA scoping report -Roberta Nanci
 

Was ist angesagt? (18)

Cialdea - input2012
Cialdea - input2012Cialdea - input2012
Cialdea - input2012
 
Impact of policies on soil erosion in the European Union
Impact of policies on soil erosion in the European UnionImpact of policies on soil erosion in the European Union
Impact of policies on soil erosion in the European Union
 
Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...
Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...
Report on the evaluation and future orientations of the Strategic Action Prog...
 
Alaska
AlaskaAlaska
Alaska
 
Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, California
Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, CaliforniaWater Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, California
Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines - Costa Mesa, California
 
Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwater
Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwaterTopographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwater
Topographic attributes control groundwater flow and groundwater
 
The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...
The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...
The Impact of Seismic Facies Analysis on the Reservoir Architecture of “CHARL...
 
PM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.b
PM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.bPM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.b
PM.12-EXAMPLE-PME-Quarry Plan-101.b
 
Payne developing criteria for soil health
Payne developing criteria for soil healthPayne developing criteria for soil health
Payne developing criteria for soil health
 
Using soil data to inform soil health
Using soil data to inform soil healthUsing soil data to inform soil health
Using soil data to inform soil health
 
West virginia
West virginiaWest virginia
West virginia
 
Mangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan Final
Mangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan FinalMangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan Final
Mangrove Restoration Monitoring Plan Final
 
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
Soil Organic Carbon as observed in lowlands of Continuous Rice Cropping in Gu...
 
Geotechnics report
Geotechnics report Geotechnics report
Geotechnics report
 
Geotechnics
GeotechnicsGeotechnics
Geotechnics
 
Scert final
Scert finalScert final
Scert final
 
Paper2 justwan
Paper2 justwanPaper2 justwan
Paper2 justwan
 
EIA scoping report -
EIA scoping report -EIA scoping report -
EIA scoping report -
 

Ähnlich wie Baseline template 2009 18 foothills land trust 4 of 5

Environmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryEnvironmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryAshleyTso1
 
Environmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryEnvironmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryAshleyTso1
 
Field work in geology courses by different science
Field work in geology courses by different scienceField work in geology courses by different science
Field work in geology courses by different scienceThomIya
 
Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12
Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12
Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12Christopher Hayes
 
Deliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Deliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master PlansDeliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Deliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master PlansCarlos Jimenez
 
SITE_ANALYSIS.pptx
SITE_ANALYSIS.pptxSITE_ANALYSIS.pptx
SITE_ANALYSIS.pptxAnjuWanti1
 
2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)
2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)
2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)Yohan Mudhoo
 
Space standards for facility areas and utilites
Space standards for facility areas and utilitesSpace standards for facility areas and utilites
Space standards for facility areas and utilitesgayathrysatheesan1
 
Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01
Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01
Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01Louisette Lanteigne
 
Soil Atlas of Asia: Japan
Soil Atlas of Asia: JapanSoil Atlas of Asia: Japan
Soil Atlas of Asia: JapanExternalEvents
 
Landuse landcover mapping
Landuse landcover mappingLanduse landcover mapping
Landuse landcover mappingAditya Kushwaha
 
Application of remote sensing in coastal zone management
Application of remote sensing in coastal zone managementApplication of remote sensing in coastal zone management
Application of remote sensing in coastal zone managementMayur Tade
 
Environmental Issues Related to Construction Projects
Environmental Issues Related to Construction ProjectsEnvironmental Issues Related to Construction Projects
Environmental Issues Related to Construction Projectsbuckje123
 
Best Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR Projects
Best Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR ProjectsBest Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR Projects
Best Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR Projects Trihydro Corporation
 

Ähnlich wie Baseline template 2009 18 foothills land trust 4 of 5 (20)

Environmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryEnvironmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian Country
 
Environmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian CountryEnvironmental Permitting in Indian Country
Environmental Permitting in Indian Country
 
Ebmp pdf 4
Ebmp pdf 4Ebmp pdf 4
Ebmp pdf 4
 
Nelson quarry lanteigne
Nelson quarry lanteigneNelson quarry lanteigne
Nelson quarry lanteigne
 
Field work in geology courses by different science
Field work in geology courses by different scienceField work in geology courses by different science
Field work in geology courses by different science
 
Conservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions
Conservation Restrictions in Conservation SubdivisionsConservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions
Conservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions
 
Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12
Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12
Mapd conservation development presentation 6 7-12
 
Deliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Deliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master PlansDeliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master Plans
Deliverables per system Land Use Strategic Master Plans
 
chapter 4.ppt
chapter 4.pptchapter 4.ppt
chapter 4.ppt
 
SITE_ANALYSIS.pptx
SITE_ANALYSIS.pptxSITE_ANALYSIS.pptx
SITE_ANALYSIS.pptx
 
2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)
2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)
2 site and temporary of works r0riginal (stu.ed)
 
Space standards for facility areas and utilites
Space standards for facility areas and utilitesSpace standards for facility areas and utilites
Space standards for facility areas and utilites
 
Lecture 10p
Lecture 10pLecture 10p
Lecture 10p
 
Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01
Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01
Nelsonquarrylanteigne 121011161032-phpapp01
 
Soil Atlas of Asia: Japan
Soil Atlas of Asia: JapanSoil Atlas of Asia: Japan
Soil Atlas of Asia: Japan
 
File287
File287File287
File287
 
Landuse landcover mapping
Landuse landcover mappingLanduse landcover mapping
Landuse landcover mapping
 
Application of remote sensing in coastal zone management
Application of remote sensing in coastal zone managementApplication of remote sensing in coastal zone management
Application of remote sensing in coastal zone management
 
Environmental Issues Related to Construction Projects
Environmental Issues Related to Construction ProjectsEnvironmental Issues Related to Construction Projects
Environmental Issues Related to Construction Projects
 
Best Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR Projects
Best Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR ProjectsBest Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR Projects
Best Practices for NEPA Compliance and Related Permitting for EOR Projects
 

Mehr von Alberta Real Estate Foundation

Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5
Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5
Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5Alberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5
Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5
Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5Alberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5
Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5
Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5Alberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practisesAlberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practisesAlberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship funding
Alberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship fundingAlberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship funding
Alberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship fundingAlberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentation
Alberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentationAlberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentation
Alberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentationAlberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practices
Alberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practicesAlberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practices
Alberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practicesAlberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring training
Alberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring trainingAlberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring training
Alberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring trainingAlberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Re-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders Report
Re-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders ReportRe-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders Report
Re-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders ReportAlberta Real Estate Foundation
 
Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000
Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000
Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000Alberta Real Estate Foundation
 

Mehr von Alberta Real Estate Foundation (19)

Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5
Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5
Legal defense costs 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 2 of 5
 
Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5
Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5
Conservation easement 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 3 of 5
 
Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5
Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5
Policies and procedures 2009 18 foothills land trust $24,420 1 of 5
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practisesAlberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
Alberta land trust 2009 03 4 of 6-best stewardship practises
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship funding
Alberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship fundingAlberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship funding
Alberta land trust 2009 03 3 of 6-dedicated stewardship funding
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentation
Alberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentationAlberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentation
Alberta land trust 2009 03 1 of 6-baseline documentation
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practices
Alberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practicesAlberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practices
Alberta land trust 2009 03 5 of 6-beneficial management practices
 
Alberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring training
Alberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring trainingAlberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring training
Alberta land trust 2009 03 2 of 6-stewardship monitoring training
 
Re-Imagining our Neighbourhoods Slides
Re-Imagining our Neighbourhoods SlidesRe-Imagining our Neighbourhoods Slides
Re-Imagining our Neighbourhoods Slides
 
Re-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders Report
Re-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders ReportRe-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders Report
Re-imagining our Neighbourhoods - Thought Leaders Report
 
Sustainability at Home: A toolkit for Albertans
Sustainability at Home: A toolkit for AlbertansSustainability at Home: A toolkit for Albertans
Sustainability at Home: A toolkit for Albertans
 
Carsharing in Greater Forest Lawn
Carsharing in Greater Forest LawnCarsharing in Greater Forest Lawn
Carsharing in Greater Forest Lawn
 
Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000
Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000
Cows and fish 2009 29 communicating ecological worth $50,000
 
Baseline documentation foothills land trust 5 of 5
Baseline documentation foothills land trust 5 of 5Baseline documentation foothills land trust 5 of 5
Baseline documentation foothills land trust 5 of 5
 
6 of 6 fund development
6 of 6 fund development 6 of 6 fund development
6 of 6 fund development
 
bow valley private land
bow valley private landbow valley private land
bow valley private land
 
Sustainable Action Canmore
Sustainable Action CanmoreSustainable Action Canmore
Sustainable Action Canmore
 
Greening Roofs in Edmonton
Greening Roofs in EdmontonGreening Roofs in Edmonton
Greening Roofs in Edmonton
 
Green Calgary Your New Home
Green Calgary Your New HomeGreen Calgary Your New Home
Green Calgary Your New Home
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdflior mazor
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoffsammart93
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...apidays
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationjfdjdjcjdnsjd
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Miguel Araújo
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationRadu Cotescu
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc
 
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVKhem
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)Gabriella Davis
 
Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonAnna Loughnan Colquhoun
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfsudhanshuwaghmare1
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘RTylerCroy
 
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...apidays
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAndrey Devyatkin
 
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?Igalia
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...apidays
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Building Digital Trust in a Digital Economy by Veron...
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organizationScaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
Scaling API-first – The story of a global engineering organization
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CVReal Time Object Detection Using Open CV
Real Time Object Detection Using Open CV
 
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
A Domino Admins Adventures (Engage 2024)
 
Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘🐬  The future of MySQL is Postgres   🐘
🐬 The future of MySQL is Postgres 🐘
 
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Tata AIG General Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
Apidays New York 2024 - The value of a flexible API Management solution for O...
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
A Year of the Servo Reboot: Where Are We Now?
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 

Baseline template 2009 18 foothills land trust 4 of 5

  • 1. Foothills Land Trust CE Baseline Annotated Template The baseline documentation report (BDR) provides a snap shot of the biophysical condition of a property subject to a conservation easement and represents an agreement between the Land Trust and landowner. It serves as a basis for monitoring compliance and to inform the enforcement process and/or defense of the CE in court. The BDR states the purpose of the conservation easement and documents the conservation value of the property, current land uses, biophysical conditions and potential threats at the time of securement. 1.0 BACKGROUND The background section of the BDR provides general information on the property, landowner and individual preparing the baseline, as well as a legal description of property and reference to the CE. The majority of landowners are knowledgeable about their land and buildings. Maintaining strong land owner relations is a priority stewardship goal for any land trust. Thus it is advisable to involve the landowner in the BDR. This can be done by having the landowner participate in the field visit and/or through an interview process (See suggested questions in Appendix 2). 1.1. Property Name • Name of CE property (used to refer to easement by FLT) 1.2. Property Contact • Owner name • Contact Person (if different from above) • Contact information including phone number, fax number, email and mailing address 1.3. Baseline Prepared by The BDR is a component of legal defense. FLT should keep on file the resume of the volunteer or contractor who prepared the BDR. The BDR should include a brief statement of the qualifications of the volunteer/contractor who prepared the BDR such as relevant training, professional designation, and years of experience. • Name of individual completing baseline • Date(s) of field visit • Contact information including phone number, email and mailing address • Statement of qualifications/expertise 1.4. Legal Description Refer to land titles for legal description, but also provide details for areas (zones) that are exempt from CE clauses and/or where permissions need to be granted from the land trust. • Legal Description (ATS) (LLD or LSD. • Area of CE (acres, hectares) • Area (acres, hectares, m3) of take-out parcels • Area descriptions (location using local landmarks, GPS waypoints (nad83). www.foothillslandtrust.org
  • 2. Relevant title encumbrances (refer to land title) Appendix 1 Copy of the Land title(s) after CE is registered Appendix 2: Potential questions to ask landowner/land manager to inform baseline report 1.5. Conservation Easement Reference Statement Refer back to the CE (may include the date CE was signed) and provide a brief history of donation of CE, indicate if CE is donation, split receipt, paid and/or an Ecological Gift under Environment Canada’s Ecological Gift Program. • Provide a reference to the conservation easement agreement, • Date it was signed, • Description of donation/acquisition of property. 1.6 Partnership Approach • Describe the link between the FLT mission statement and the land owner’s interest in placing a CE on the property. • Attach the Letter of Intent from the landowner 2.0 PURPOSE OF CE The purpose of the CE states the intent of the conservation easement and the common purpose of the CE from the landowner and land trust perspectives. In this section, regional and local conservation values that the CE protects are highlighted. There is debate around focusing the purpose on regional or local conservation values, because of instances whereby documentation is considered either too vague or too specific in describing the purpose. Clarity is important when describing the conservation value and a land trust needs to consider landscapes as dynamic entities and that a CE is for perpetuity. For example, describing the purpose of a CE in protecting habitat for an endangered species could be problematic in court if the species becomes extirpated from the region. In addition, the language linking the CE and BDR must be consistent. The reader of the BDR should understand the reason the landowners and land trust have entered into a CE. For example, is there a common purpose or shared conservation values? Attaching a letter of intent from the landowner and referring to the FLT mission statement, if appropriate, will help readers to understand the intent of the CE. Context 2.1 Regional Context A regional context will be provided by highlighting the general conservation values (e.g. species at risk, ecological systems/landscapes of interest, Ecologically Significant Areas) of the property in relation to the MD of Foothills and lands adjacent and/or nearby the CE (e.g. other government or privately protected lands). 2.2 Local Context Context Highlight specific natural features of the landscape, including any specific sensitive ecosystem types or features found on the property. Insert Map 1 – Surrounding context - include roads, rivers and streams, protected areas, other parcels of interest (as detailed in regional context) FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template 2
  • 3. 3.0 Anthropogenic Features and Land Use Activities A BDR documents the current condition of the land at the time of signing. To monitor for compliance, all anthropogenic features occurring on the CE property will be documented. This section will be tied into the CE restrictions and will include a list of features to be grandfathered into the CE. If a planned feature does not yet exist on the property, it should be stated as such in the BDR. All features will be mapped and photographed to provide clarity to the baseline and the purpose of the structures will be explained. Anthropogenic 3.1 Existing Anthropogenic features (Grandfathered into CE) • Provide a written description (include purpose of feature), map (UTM (using GPS unit) and photograph (include UTM (using GPS unit) of photo, direction of photo (using compass directions) and photo description) all existing human made features on the landscape. • Some features to consider based on FLT restrictions; o All building structures and associated infrastructure o Fences (record height and number of wire strands) o Roads and Trails o Soil disturbance (cleared areas) o Mining (sand, rock, gravel piles) o Existing oil and gas infrastructure o Garbage, waste or debris sites o Water systems (irrigation, troughs, wells, dugouts) o Wildlife traps o Areas where chemicals ( pesticides, fertilizers and herbicides) have been applied o May need to consider other features as well depending on specifics of the CE and the property Map 2 – Anthropogenic Features- location within CE of features described above 3.2 Land Use Activity To enable the land trust to assess the level of risk on a property, the BDR will describe the historic and current land uses on the property and on neighboring parcels. For example, are there any areas on or near the property that may be zoned for conflicting activities that might put the conservation values of the property at risk? Does the landowner have existing management plans in place to guide land management (e.g. forestry, grazing)? All current management plans being used by the landowner will be documented. The BDR can inform and guide the development of any future management plans for the property. • Describe historical (if relevant) and current land use activities for the CE and specified areas if applicable. • Current zoning. • Refer to existing management plans. • Highlight land use activities on surrounding parcels. Appendix 3 Existing Management Plans for Property Appendix 4: Photo table of locations, map and photos 4.0 Natural Features All water features should be identified by type (river, stream, pond, lake, and wetland), mapped and photographed. Note if the water features are ephemeral or year round, direction of flow, and activities up stream that may impact health. FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template 3
  • 4. CE clauses that refer to the health or condition of water features may be difficult to measure. The land trust needs to develop protocols for how it will determine if this clause is in compliance. Features 4.1 Hydrological Features • Provide a written description, map (UTM (using GPS unit) and photograph (UTM (using GPS unit), direction of photo (using compass) and photo description) all existing water features on the CE. • Water features may include: o Rivers, streams o Water bodies (lakes, ponds, wetlands) o Springs 4.2 Water Quality • Note activities occurring on the CE that may impact water health? o Wildlife / stock watering o Trails / roads through water systems o proximity to an agricultural field o Recreational use o Chemical usage o Wildlife presence / absence • Water sampling approaches o Water samples will be taken where a stream enters and exits the property to generate a baseline of water quality. Future monitoring of the effect of activities will refer to the baseline. Map 4 – Water Features- location within CE of features described above 4.2 Vegetation Vegetation communities should be documented on map, with photos and described in the BDR. In addition, threats to the native vegetation should be documented (e.g. invasive species). • Provide a written description (include dominant species, rare and unusual flora, human –made habitat), map (UTM (using GPS unit) and photograph (UTM (using GPS unit), direction of photo (using compass) and photo description) all vegetation communities including natural and human-made on the CE. • Common types of vegetation communities include native grassland, wetland, riparian, croplands, tame forage, aspen and spruce forest. (May be able to use remote sensing or Alberta Vegetation Index or Alberta Plant Community Guides as a starting point). • Document threats to native vegetation communities. • Describe and list invasive species occurring on the CE (document larger patches on map, using UTM (GPS Unit). Map 5 – Vegetation Communities - location within CE of features described above 4.3 Surficial Bedrock Geology and Soils • Identify surface and underlying geology • Use AGRSID to determine soil series FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template 4
  • 5. Map 6 – Soil Series 4.3 Wildlife In this section of the BDR describe important wildlife habitat (e.g. ungulate winter range, grizzly bear movement corridor), species of interest or any other ecological values. Include in this section rare, endangered species (including rank) that may occur on the property. This section may reply heavily on landowner knowledge, local expert knowledge (local fish and wildlife officers, biologists) or research reports. • List specific habitat occurring on the property for terrestrial or aquatic species and/or species groups of interest • List any important migrating species that use the property as permanent or seasonal habitat or for movement opportunities for specific groups and or species? • Reference other research/reports that document the importance of this area for species groups and/or species. • List any rare or endangered species occurring on the property. Specify rank and if recovery plan is in place. Appendix 3: Photo table of locations, map and photos 5.0 Monitoring Recommendations A BDR should include a series of recommendations about how to monitor the property and to help inform the management plans developed by FLT. • List any recommendations for future monitoring (e.g. invasive species of concern, addressing threats outlined in the BDR). • Time of year for monitoring to occur. • How often monitoring should occur • Frequency of using certain types of field methodologies if appropriate to CE clauses or existing management plan (e.g. range health, riparian health) 6.0 Owner Acknowledgement of Condition • Include a section for signatures, where FLT and landowners agree to the BDR as accurately representing the current condition of the property. • Date of completion. Appendix 1: Land Title Appendix 2: Landowner Interview –suggested questions to inform BDR a. Length of time as owner of property b. Existing land uses of property (also historical if different) e.g. agriculture, ranching, recreation and forestry) c. Current management regime (Are there any management plans?). d. Are there areas/topics you feel you would like to know more about? e. Discuss anthropogenic features on the landscape and purpose of features. f. Discuss water features on the landscape – location of features g. Do you have invasive species on the property (list species if possible) and discuss location of patches. As well as history (eg. pathways of invasion) FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template 5
  • 6. h. Are you aware of any water quality assessments on this property? Are you interested in learning more about water health issues? i. Are there areas where chemical pesticides or fertilizers have been used on the property? If yes, please explain why? j. Please list species you have seen on the property and frequency of sightings? k. Are there things you are concerned about from a stewardship perspective that FLT might be able to assist you with? Appendix 3: Photo Location table, map and photos (with description) Photo # UTM East UTM West Date Map 7 – Photograph locations Prepared by Miistakis Institute for Foothills Land Trust With support from Alberta Real Estate Foundation and The Calgary Foundation Disclaimer This Baseline Documentation Report Template was created for the Foothills Land Trust and may or may not be appropriate for all land trust organizations. It is available for any land trust to use and to adapt for its own purposes. Foothills Land Trust is not responsible for any results achieved or decisions made through the use of the Baseline Documentation Report Template. FLT CE Baseline Annotated Template 6