Kala jadu for love marriage | Real amil baba | Famous amil baba | kala jadu n...
Agriculture at a Cross Roads
1. SCIENCE | AGRICULTURE | CURRENT AFFAIRS
“Although considered by many to be a success story, the benefits of productivity increases in
world agriculture are unevenly spread. Often the poorest of the poor have gained little or noth-
ing; and 850 million people are still hungry or malnourished with an additional 4 million more
Agriculture
at a
joining their ranks annually. We are putting food that appears cheap on our tables; but it is
Crossroads
food that is not always healthy and that costs us dearly in terms of water, soil and the biological
diversity on which all our futures depend.”
—Professor Bob Watson, director, IAASTD
The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Devel-
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge,
opment (IAASTD) , on which Agriculture at the Crossroads is based, was a three-year collab-
orative effort begun in 2005 that assessed our capacity to meet development and sustainabil- Science and Technology for Development
ity goals of:
• Reducing hunger and poverty
• Improving nutrition, health and rural livelihoods
• Facilitating social and environmental sustainability
Governed by a multi-stakeholder bureau comprised of 30 representatives from government
and 30 from civil society, the process brought together 110 governments and 400 experts, rep-
resenting non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the private sector, producers, consumers,
the scientific community, multilateral environment agreements (MEAs), and multiple interna-
tional agencies involved in the agricultural and rural development sectors.
In addition to assessing existing conditions and knowledge, the IAASTD uses a simple set of
model projections to look at the future, based on knowledge from past events and existing
trends such as population growth, rural/urban food and poverty dynamics, loss of agricultural
land, water availability, and climate change effects.
This set of volumes comprises the findings of the IAASTD. It consists of a Global Report, a
Executive Summary
brief Synthesis Report, and 5 subglobal reports. Taken as a whole, the IAASTD reports are an
indispensable reference for anyone working in the field of agriculture and rural development,
whether at the level of basic research, policy, or practice.
Cover design by Linda McKnight, McKnight Design, LLC
Cover photos (left to right): Steve Raymer, Dean Conger, and
William Albert Allard of National Geographic Stock, Mark
Edwards (both images) of Peter Arnold, Inc.
of the Synthesis Report
Washington • Covelo • London
www.islandpress.org
All Island Press books are printed on recycled, acid-free paper.
2. IAASTD
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science
and Technology for Development
Executive Summary of
the Synthesis Report
00-fm EXEC.indd 1 11/3/08 12:04:17 PM
4. IAASTD
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science
and Technology for Development
Executive Summary of
the Synthesis Report
This summary was approved in detail by the Governments attending the IAASTD
Intergovernmental Plenary in Johannesburg, South Africa (7-11 April 2008).
00-fm EXEC.indd 3 11/3/08 12:04:31 PM
6. Contents
vii Foreword
viii Preface
x Statement by Governments
1 Executive Summary
12 Annex A Reservations on Executive Summary
13 Annex B Authors and Review Editors of Global and Sub-Global Reports
20 Annex C Secretariat and Cosponsor Focal Points
21 Annex D Steering Committee for Consultative Process and Advisory Bureau for Assessment
00-fm EXEC.indd 5 11/10/08 1:50:53 PM
8. Foreword
The objective of the International Assessment of Agricul- retariat. We would specifically like to thank the cosponsor-
tural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development ing organizations of the Global Environment Facility (GEF)
(IAASTD) was to assess the impacts of past, present and and the World Bank for their financial contributions as well
future agricultural knowledge, science and technology on as the FAO, UNEP, and the United Nations Educational,
the: Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for their
• reduction of hunger and poverty, continued support of this process through allocation of staff
• improvement of rural livelihoods and human health, resources.
and We acknowledge with gratitude the governments and
• equitable, socially, environmentally and economically organizations that contributed to the Multidonor Trust
sustainable development. Fund (Australia, Canada, the European Commission,
France, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United King-
The IAASTD was initiated in 2002 by the World Bank and dom) and the United States Trust Fund. We also thank the
the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Na- governments who provided support to Bureau members,
tions (FAO) as a global consultative process to determine authors and reviewers in other ways. In addition, Finland
whether an international assessment of agricultural knowl- provided direct support to the Secretariat. The IAASTD was
edge, science and technology was needed. Mr. Klaus Töepfer, especially successful in engaging a large number of experts
Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Pro- from developing countries and countries with economies in
gramme (UNEP) opened the first Intergovernmental Plenary transition in its work; the Trust Funds enabled financial as-
(30 August-3 September 2004) in Nairobi, Kenya, during sistance for their travel to the IAASTD meetings.
which participants initiated a detailed scoping, preparation, We would also like to make special mention of the Re-
drafting and peer review process. gional Organizations who hosted the regional coordinators
The outputs from this assessment are a Global and five and staff and provided assistance in management and time
Sub-Global reports; a Global and five Sub-Global Sum- to ensure success of this enterprise: the African Center for
maries for Decision Makers; and a cross-cutting Synthesis Technology Studies (ACTS) in Kenya, the Inter-American
Report with an Executive Summary. The Summaries for De- Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) in Costa
cision Makers and the Synthesis Report specifically provide Rica, the International Center for Agricultural Research in
options for action to governments, international agencies, the Dry Areas (ICARDA) in Syria and the WorldFish Center
academia, research organizations and other decision makers in Malaysia.
around the world. The final Intergovernmental Plenary in Johannesburg,
The reports draw on the work of hundreds of experts South Africa was opened on 7 April 2008 by Achim Steiner,
from all regions of the world who have participated in the Executive Director of UNEP. This Plenary saw the accep-
preparation and peer review process. As has been customary tance of the Reports and the approval of the Summaries for
in many such global assessments, success depended first and Decision Makers and the Executive Summary of the Synthe-
foremost on the dedication, enthusiasm and cooperation of sis Report by an overwhelming majority of governments.
these experts in many different but related disciplines. It is
the synergy of these interrelated disciplines that permitted
IAASTD to create a unique, interdisciplinary regional and Signed:
global process.
We take this opportunity to express our deep gratitude Co-chairs
to the authors and reviewers of all of the reports—their Hans H. Herren
dedication and tireless efforts made the process a success. Judi Wakhungu
We thank the Steering Committee for distilling the outputs
of the consultative process into recommendations to the Director
Plenary, the IAASTD Bureau for their advisory role during Robert T. Watson
the assessment and the work of those in the extended Sec-
vii
00-fm EXEC.indd 7 11/3/08 12:04:32 PM
9. Preface
In August 2002, the World Bank and the Food and Agri- Goals (MDGs): the reduction of hunger and poverty; the
culture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations initiated improvement of rural livelihoods and human health; and fa-
a global consultative process to determine whether an in- cilitating equitable, socially, environmentally and economi-
ternational assessment of agricultural knowledge, science cally sustainable development. Realizing these goals requires
and technology (AKST) was needed. This was stimulated acknowledging the multifunctionality of agriculture: the chal-
by discussions at the World Bank with the private sector lenge is to simultaneously meet development and sustainabil-
and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) on the state of ity goals while increasing agricultural production.
scientific understanding of biotechnology and more specifi- Meeting these goals has to be placed in the context of a
cally transgenics. During 2003, eleven consultations were rapidly changing world of urbanization, growing inequities,
held, overseen by an international multistakeholder steer- human migration, globalization, changing dietary prefer-
ing committee and involving over 800 participants from all ences, climate change, environmental degradation, a trend
relevant stakeholder groups, e.g., governments, the private toward biofuels and an increasing population. These condi-
sector and civil society. Based on these consultations the tions are affecting local and global food security and put-
steering committee recommended to an Intergovernmental ting pressure on productive capacity and ecosystems. Hence
Plenary meeting in Nairobi in September 2004 that an in- there are unprecedented challenges ahead in providing food
ternational assessment of the role of AKST in reducing hun- within a global trading system where there are other com-
ger and poverty, improving rural livelihoods and facilitating peting uses for agricultural and other natural resources.
environmentally, socially and economically sustainable AKST alone cannot solve these problems, which are caused
development was needed. The concept of an International by complex political and social dynamics, but it can make
Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Tech- a major contribution to meeting development and sustain-
nology for Development (IAASTD) was endorsed as a multi- ability goals. Never before has it been more important for
thematic, multi-spatial, multi-temporal intergovernmental the world to generate and use AKST.
process with a multistakeholder Bureau cosponsored by the Given the focus on hunger, poverty and livelihoods,
FAO, the Global Environment Facility (GEF), United Na- the IAASTD pays special attention to the current situation,
tions Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations issues and potential opportunities to redirect the current
Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations Educa- AKST system to improve the situation for poor rural peo-
tional, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the ple, especially small-scale farmers, rural laborers and others
World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO). with limited resources. It addresses issues critical to formu-
The IAASTD’s governance structure is a unique hybrid lating policy and provides information for decision makers
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confronting conflicting views on contentious issues such as
and the nongovernmental Millennium Ecosystem Assess- the environmental consequences of productivity increases,
ment (MA). The stakeholder composition of the Bureau was environmental and human health impacts of transgenic
agreed at the Intergovernmental Plenary meeting in Nairobi; crops, the consequences of bioenergy development on the
it is geographically balanced and multistakeholder with 30 environment and on the long-term availability and price of
government and 30 civil society representatives (NGOs, food, and the implications of climate change on agricultural
producer and consumer groups, private sector entities and production. The Bureau agreed that the scope of the assess-
international organizations) in order to ensure ownership of ment needed to go beyond the narrow confines of science
the process and findings by a range of stakeholders. and technology (S&T) and should encompass other types
About 400 of the world’s experts were selected by the of relevant knowledge (e.g., knowledge held by agricultural
Bureau, following nominations by stakeholder groups, to producers, consumers and end users) and that it should also
prepare the IAASTD Report (comprised of a Global and assess the role of institutions, organizations, governance,
five Sub-Global assessments). These experts worked in their markets and trade.
own capacity and did not represent any particular stake- The IAASTD is a multidisciplinary and multistakeholder
holder group. Additional individuals, organizations and enterprise requiring the use and integration of information,
governments were involved in the peer review process. tools and models from different knowledge paradigms in-
The IAASTD development and sustainability goals were cluding local and traditional knowledge. The IAASTD does
endorsed at the first Intergovernmental Plenary and are con- not advocate specific policies or practices; it assesses the ma-
sistent with a subset of the UN Millennium Development jor issues facing AKST and points towards a range of AKST
viii
00-fm EXEC.indd 8 11/3/08 12:04:32 PM
10. IAASTD Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report | ix
options for action that meet development and sustainability and open to comments by anyone. The authors revised the
goals. It is policy relevant, but not policy prescriptive. It drafts based on numerous peer review comments, with the
integrates scientific information on a range of topics that assistance of review editors who were responsible for ensur-
are critically interlinked, but often addressed independently, ing the comments were appropriately taken into account.
i.e., agriculture, poverty, hunger, human health, natural re- One of the most difficult issues authors had to address was
sources, environment, development and innovation. It will criticisms that the report was too negative. In a scientific
enable decision makers to bring a richer base of knowledge review based on empirical evidence, this is always a difficult
to bear on policy and management decisions on issues previ- comment to handle, as criteria are needed in order to say
ously viewed in isolation. Knowledge gained from historical whether something is negative or positive. Another difficulty
analysis (typically the past 50 years) and an analysis of some was responding to the conflicting views expressed by review-
future development alternatives to 2050 form the basis for as- ers. The difference in views was not surprising given the
sessing options for action on science and technology, capacity range of stakeholder interests and perspectives. Thus one of
development, institutions and policies, and investments. the key findings of the IAASTD is that there are diverse and
The IAASTD is conducted according to an open, trans- conflicting interpretations of past and current events, which
parent, representative and legitimate process; is evidence need to be acknowledged and respected.
based; presents options rather than recommendations; as- The Global and Sub-Global Summaries for Decision
sesses different local, regional and global perspectives; pres- Makers and the Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report
ents different views, acknowledging that there can be more were approved at an Intergovernmental Plenary in April
than one interpretation of the same evidence based on differ- 2008. The Synthesis Report integrates the key findings from
ent worldviews; and identifies the key scientific uncertainties the Global and Sub-Global assessments, and focuses on eight
and areas on which research could be focused to advance Bureau-approved topics: bioenergy; biotechnology; climate
development and sustainability goals. change; human health; natural resource management; tradi-
The IAASTD is composed of a Global assessment and five tional knowledge and community based innovation; trade
Sub-Global assessments: Central and West Asia and North and markets; and women in agriculture.
Africa – CWANA; East and South Asia and the Pacific – ESAP; The IAASTD builds on and adds value to a number of
Latin America and the Caribbean – LAC; North America and recent assessments and reports that have provided valuable
Europe – NAE; Sub-Saharan Africa – SSA. It (1) assesses the information relevant to the agricultural sector, but have not
generation, access, dissemination and use of public and private specifically focused on the future role of AKST, the institu-
sector AKST in relation to the goals, using local, traditional tional dimensions and the multifunctionality of agriculture.
and formal knowledge; (2) analyzes existing and emerging These include: FAO State of Food Insecurity in the World
technologies, practices, policies and institutions and their (yearly); InterAcademy Council Report: Realizing the Prom-
impact on the goals; (3) provides information for decision ise and Potential of African Agriculture (2004); UN Mil-
makers in different civil society, private and public organi- lennium Project Task Force on Hunger (2005); Millennium
zations on options for improving policies, practices, institu- Ecosystem Assessment (2005); CGIAR Science Council
tional and organizational arrangements to enable AKST to Strategy and Priority Setting Exercise (2006); Comprehen-
meet the goals; (4) brings together a range of stakeholders sive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture: Guid-
(consumers, governments, international agencies and re- ing Policy Investments in Water, Food, Livelihoods and
search organizations, NGOs, private sector, producers, the Environment (2007); Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
scientific community) involved in the agricultural sector and Change Reports (2001 and 2007); UNEP Fourth Global
rural development to share their experiences, views, under- Environmental Outlook (2007); World Bank World Devel-
standing and vision for the future; and (5) identifies options opment Report: Agriculture for Development (2008); IFPRI
for future public and private investments in AKST. In addi- Global Hunger Indices (yearly); and World Bank Internal
tion, the IAASTD will enhance local and regional capacity Report of Investments in SSA (2007).
to design, implement and utilize similar assessments. Financial support was provided to the IAASTD by
In this assessment agriculture is used to include produc- the cosponsoring agencies, the governments of Australia,
tion of food, feed, fuel, fiber and other products and to in- Canada, Finland, France, Ireland, Sweden, Switzerland, US
clude all sectors from production of inputs (e.g., seeds and and UK, and the European Commission. In addition, many
fertilizer) to consumption of products. However, as in all organizations have provided in-kind support. The authors
assessments, some topics were covered less extensively than and review editors have given freely of their time, largely
others (e.g., livestock, forestry, fisheries and the agricultural without compensation.
sector of small island countries, and agricultural engineer- The Global and Sub-Global Summaries for Decision
ing), largely due to the expertise of the selected authors. Makers and the Synthesis Report are written for a range of
Originally the Bureau approved a chapter on plausible fu- stakeholders, i.e., government policy makers, private sector,
tures (a visioning exercise), but later there was agreement NGOs, producer and consumer groups, international orga-
to delete this chapter in favor of a more simple set of model nizations and the scientific community. There are no recom-
projections. Similarly the Bureau approved a chapter on ca- mendations, only options for action. The options for action
pacity development, but this chapter was dropped and key are not prioritized because different options are actionable
messages integrated into other chapters. by different stakeholders, each of whom have a different
The IAASTD draft Report was subjected to two rounds set of priorities and responsibilities and operate in different
of peer review by governments, organizations and individu- socioeconomic and political circumstances.
als. These drafts were placed on an open access Web site
ix
00-fm EXEC.indd 9 11/3/08 12:04:33 PM
11. Statement by Governments
All countries present at the final intergovernmental plenary Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belize, Benin,
session held in Johannesburg, South Africa in April 2008 Bhutan, Botswana, Brazil, Cameroon, People’s Republic of
welcome the work of the IAASTD and the uniqueness of China, Costa Rica, Cuba, Democratic Republic of Congo,
this independent multistakeholder and multidisciplinary Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Finland,
process, and the scale of the challenge of covering a broad France, Gambia, Ghana, Honduras, India, Iran, Ireland,
range of complex issues. The Governments present recog- Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic,
nize that the Global and Sub-Global Reports are the conclu- Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Maldives, Republic
sions of studies by a wide range of scientific authors, experts of Moldova, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan,
and development specialists and while presenting an overall Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Republic of Palau,
consensus on the importance of agricultural knowledge, sci- Romania, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Solomon Islands, Swazi-
ence and technology for development they also provide a land, Sweden, Switzerland, United Republic of Tanzania,
diversity of views on some issues. Timor-Leste, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, United King-
All countries see these Reports as a valuable and im- dom of Great Britain, Uruguay, Viet Nam, Zambia (58
portant contribution to our understanding on agricultural countries).
knowledge, science and technology for development recog-
nizing the need to further deepen our understanding of the
challenges ahead. This Assessment is a constructive initia- While approving the above statement the following govern-
tive and important contribution that all governments need ments did not fully approve the Executive Summary of the
to take forward to ensure that agricultural knowledge, sci- Synthesis Report and their reservations are entered in An-
ence and technology fulfils its potential to meet the develop- nex A.
ment and sustainability goals of the reduction of hunger and
poverty, the improvement of rural livelihoods and human Australia, Canada, United States of America (3 countries).
health, and facilitating equitable, socially, environmentally
and economically sustainable development.
In accordance with the above statement, the following
governments approve the Executive Summary of the Syn-
thesis Report.
x
00-fm EXEC.indd 10 11/3/08 12:04:33 PM
12. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD)
Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report
Writing team: Tsedeke Abate (Ethiopia), Jean Albergel (France),
Inge Armbrecht (Colombia), Patrick Avato (Germany/Italy),
Satinder Bajaj (India), Nienke Beintema (the Netherlands),
Rym Ben Zid (Tunisia), Rodney Brown (USA), Lorna M. Butler
(Canada), Fabrice Dreyfus (France), Kristie L. Ebi (USA),
Shelley Feldman (USA), Alia Gana (Tunisia), Tirso Gonzales
(Peru), Ameenah Gurib-Fakim (Mauritius), Jack Heinemann
(New Zealand), Thora Herrmann (Germany), Angelika Hilbeck
(Switzerland), Hans Hurni (Switzerland), Sophia Huyer (Canada),
Janice Jiggins (UK), Joan Kagwanja (Kenya), Moses Kairo
(Kenya), Rose R. Kingamkono (Tanzania), Gordana Kranjac-
Berisavljevic (Ghana), Kawther Latiri (Tunisia), Roger Leakey
(Australia), Marianne Lefort (France), Karen Lock (UK), Thora
Herrmann (Germany), Yalem Mekonnen (Ethiopia), Douglas
Murray (USA), Dev Nathan (India), Lindela Ndlovu (Zimbabwe),
Balgis Osman-Elasha (Sudan), Ivette Perfecto (Puerto Rico),
Cristina Plencovich (Argentina), Rajeswari Raina (India),
Elizabeth Robinson (UK), Niels Roling (Netherlands), Mark
Rosegrant (USA), Erika Rosenthal (USA), Wahida Patwa Shah
(Kenya), John M.R. Stone (Canada), Abid Suleri (Pakistan), Hong
Yang (Australia)
1
01-EXEC.indd 1 11/3/08 12:04:58 PM
14. Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report of the
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science
and Technology for Development (IAASTD)
This Synthesis Report captures the complexity and diver- place by the state were the primary drivers of the adoption
sity of agriculture and agricultural knowledge, science and of new technologies. The general model has been to con-
technology (AKST) across world regions. It is built upon the tinuously innovate, reduce farm gate prices and externalize
Global and five Sub-Global reports that provide evidence costs. This model drove the phenomenal achievements of
for the integrated analysis of the main concerns necessary to AKST in industrial countries after World War II and the
achieve development and sustainability goals. It is organized spread of the Green Revolution beginning in the 1960s. But,
in two parts that address the primary animating question: given the new challenges we confront today, there is increas-
how can AKST be used to reduce hunger and poverty, im- ing recognition within formal S&T organizations that the
prove rural livelihoods, and facilitate equitable environmen- current AKST model requires revision. Business as usual is
tally, socially, and economically sustainable development? In no longer an option. This leads to rethinking the role of
the first part we identify the current conditions, challenges AKST in achieving development and sustainability goals;
and options for action that shape AKST, while in the second one that seeks more intensive engagement across diverse
part we focus on eight cross-cutting themes. The eight cross- worldviews and possibly contradictory approaches in ways
cutting themes include: bioenergy, biotechnology, climate that can inform and suggest strategies for actions enabling
change, human health, natural resource management, trade the multiple functions of agriculture.
and markets, traditional and local knowledge and commu- In order to address the diverse needs and interests that
nity-based innovation, and women in agriculture. shape human life, we need a shared approach to sustain-
The International Assessment of Agricultural Knowl- ability with local and cross-national collaboration. We can-
edge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) not escape our predicament by simply continuing to rely on
responds to the widespread realization that despite signifi- the aggregation of individual choices to achieve sustainable
cant scientific and technological achievements in our ability and equitable collective outcomes. Incentives are needed to
to increase agricultural productivity, we have been less at- influence the choices individuals make. Issues such as pov-
tentive to some of the unintended social and environmental erty and climate change also require collective agreements
consequences of our achievements. We are now in a good on concerted action and governance across scales that go be-
position to reflect on these consequences and to outline vari- yond an appeal to individual benefit. At the global, regional,
ous policy options to meet the challenges ahead, perhaps national and local levels, decision makers must be acutely
best characterized as the need for food and livelihood se- conscious of the fact that there are diverse challenges, mul-
curity under increasingly constrained environmental condi- tiple theoretical frameworks and development models and a
tions from within and outside the realm of agriculture and wide range of options to meet development and sustainabil-
globalized economic systems. ity goals. Our perception of the challenges and the choices
This widespread realization is linked directly to the we make at this juncture in history will determine how we
goals of the IAASTD: how AKST can be used to reduce protect our planet and secure our future.
hunger and poverty, to improve rural livelihoods and to fa- Development and sustainability goals should be placed
cilitate equitable environmentally, socially and economically in the context of (1) current social and economic inequities
sustainable development. Under the rubric of IAASTD, we and political uncertainties about war and conflicts; (2) uncer-
recognize the importance of AKST to the multifunctionality tainties about the ability to sustainably produce and access
of agriculture and the intersection with other local to global sufficient food; (3) uncertainties about the future of world
concerns, including loss of biodiversity and ecosystem ser- food prices; (4) changes in the economics of fossil-based en-
vices, climate change and water availability. ergy use; (5) the emergence of new competitors for natural
The IAASTD is unique in the history of agricultural resources; (6) increasing chronic diseases that are partially a
science assessments in that it assesses both formal science consequence of poor nutrition and poor food quality as well
and technology (S&T) and local and traditional knowledge, as food safety; and (7) changing environmental conditions
addresses not only production and productivity, but also and the growing awareness of human responsibility for the
the multifunctionality of agriculture and recognizes that maintenance of global ecosystem services (provisioning,
multiple perspectives exist on the role and nature of AKST. regulating, cultural and supporting).
For many years, agricultural science focused on delivering Today there is a world of asymmetric development, un-
component technologies to increase farm-level productivity sustainable natural resource use, and continued rural and
where the market and institutional arrangements put in urban poverty. Generally the adverse consequences of global
3
01-EXEC.indd 3 11/3/08 12:04:59 PM
15. 4 | Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report
changes have the most significant effects on the poorest and
most vulnerable, who historically have had limited entitle- Multifunctionality
ments and opportunities for growth. The term multifunctionality has sometimes been interpreted
The pace of formal technology generation and adoption as having implications for trade and protectionism. This is not
has been highly uneven. Actors within North America and the definition used here. In IAASTD, multifunctionality is used
Europe (NAE) and emerging economies who have captured
solely to express the inescapable interconnectedness of ag-
significant economies of scale through formal AKST will con-
riculture’s different roles and functions. The concept of multi-
tinue to dominate agricultural exports and extended value
chains. There is an urgent need to diversify and strengthen functionality recognizes agriculture as a multi-output activity
AKST, recognizing differences in agroecologies and social producing not only commodities (food, feed, fibers, agrofuels,
and cultural conditions. The need to retool AKST, to reduce medicinal products and ornamentals), but also non-commod-
poverty and provide improved livelihoods options for the ity outputs such as environmental services, landscape ameni-
rural poor, especially landless and peasant communities, ur- ties and cultural heritages.
ban, informal and migrant workers, is a major challenge. The working definition proposed by OECD, which is used
There is an overarching concern in all regions regarding by the IAASTD, associates multifunctionality with the particu-
poverty alleviation and the livelihoods options available to lar characteristics of the agricultural production process and
poor people who are faced with intra- and inter-regional its outputs; (1) multiple commodity and non-commodity out-
inequalities. There is recognition that the mounting crisis
puts are jointly produced by agriculture; and (2) some of the
in food security is of a different complexity and potentially
non-commodity outputs may exhibit the characteristics of ex-
different magnitude than the one of the 1960s. The ability
and willingness of different actors, including those in the ternalities or public goods, such that markets for these goods
state, civil society and private secter, to address fundamen- function poorly or are nonexistent.
tal questions of relationships among production, social and The use of the term has been controversial and contested
environmental systems is affected by contentious political in global trade negotiations, and it has centered on whether
and economic stances. “trade-distorting” agricultural subsidies are needed for agri-
The acknowledgment of current challenges and the ac- culture to perform its many functions. Proponents argue that
ceptance of options available for action require a long-term current patterns of agricultural subsidies, international trade
commitment from decision makers that is responsive to the and related policy frameworks do not stimulate transitions
specific needs of a wide range of stakeholders. A recogni- toward equitable agricultural and food trade relation or sus-
tion that knowledge systems and human ingenuity in sci-
tainable food and farming systems and have given rise to per-
ence, technology, practice and policy is needed to meet the
verse impacts on natural resources and agroecologies as well
challenges, opportunities and uncertainties ahead. This rec-
ognition will require a shift to nonhierarchical development as on human health and nutrition. Opponents argue that at-
models. tempts to remedy these outcomes by means of trade-related
The main challenge of AKST is to increase the produc- instruments will weaken the efficiency of agricultural trade and
tivity of agriculture in a sustainable manner. AKST must lead to further undesirable market distortion; their preferred
address the needs of small-scale farms in diverse ecosystems approach is to address the externalized costs and negative
and create realistic opportunities for their development impacts on poverty, the environment, human health and nutri-
where the potential for improved area productivity is low tion by other means.
and where climate change may have its most adverse conse-
quences. The main challenges for AKST posed by multifunc-
tional agricultural systems include:
• How to improve social welfare and personal livelihoods
in the rural sector and enhance multiplier effects of ag- Options for Action
riculture? Successfully meeting development and sustainability goals
• How to empower marginalized stakeholders to sustain and responding to new priorities and changing circumstances
the diversity of agriculture and food systems, including would require a fundamental shift in AKST, including sci-
their cultural dimensions? ence, technology, policies, institutions, capacity development
• How to provide safe water, maintain biodiversity, sus- and investment. Such a shift would recognize and give in-
tain the natural resource base and minimize the adverse creased importance to the multifunctionality of agriculture,
impacts of agricultural activities on people and the en- accounting for the complexity of agricultural systems within
vironment? diverse social and ecological contexts. It would require new
• How to maintain and enhance environmental and cul- institutional and organizational arrangements to promote
tural services while increasing sustainable productivity an integrated approach to the development and deployment
and diversity of food, fiber and biofuel production? of AKST. It would also recognize farming communities,
• How to manage effectively the collaborative generation farm households, and farmers as producers and managers
of knowledge among increasingly heterogeneous con- of ecosystems. This shift may call for changing the incentive
tributors and the flow of information among diverse systems for all actors along the value chain to internalize as
public and private AKST organizational arrangements? many externalities as possible. In terms of development and
• How to link the outputs from marginalized, rain fed sustainability goals, these policies and institutional changes
lands into local, national and global markets? should be directed primarily at those who have been served
01-EXEC.indd 4 11/3/08 12:04:59 PM
16. Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report | 5
least by previous AKST approaches, i.e., resource-poor farm-
ers, women and ethnic minorities.1 Such development would Food security [is] a situation that exists when all people, at
depend also on the extent to which small-scale farmers can all times, have physical, social and economic access to suf-
find gainful off-farm employment and help fuel general eco- ficient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs
nomic growth. Large and middle-size farmers continue to and food preferences for an active and healthy life. (FAO, The
be important and high pay-off targets of AKST, especially in
State of Food Insecurity, 2001)
the area of sustainable land use and food systems.
It will be important to assess the potential environmen-
tal, health and social impacts of any technology, and to Food sovereignty is defined as the right of peoples and sover-
implement the appropriate regulatory frameworks. AKST eign states to democratically determine their own agricultural
can contribute to radically improving food security and en- and food policies.3
hancing the social and economic performance of agricul-
tural systems as a basis for sustainable rural and community
livelihoods and wider economic development. It can help to 3
UK.
rehabilitate degraded land, reduce environmental and health
risks associated with food production and consumption and
sustainably increase production.
Success would require increased public and private
investment in AKST, the development of supporting poli- Food security
cies and institutions, revalorization of traditional and local Food security strategies require a combination of AKST
knowledge, and an interdisciplinary, holistic and systems- approaches, including the development of food stock man-
based approach to knowledge production and sharing. agement, effective market intelligence and early warning,
Success also depends on the extent to which international monitoring, and distribution systems. Production measures
developments and events drive the priority given to develop- create the conditions for food security, but they need to
ment and sustainability goals and the extent to which requi- be looked at in conjunction with people’s access to food
site funding and qualified staff are available. (through own production, exchange and public entitlements)
and their ability to absorb nutrients consumed (through ad-
Poverty and livelihoods equate access to water and sanitation, adequate nutrition
Important options for enhancing rural livelihoods include and nutritional information) in order to fully achieve food
increasing access by small-scale farmers to land and eco- security.
nomic resources and to remunerative local urban and export AKST can increase sustainable agricultural production
markets; and increasing local value added and value cap- by expanding use of local and formal AKST to develop and
tured by small-scale farmers and rural laborers. A power- deploy suitable cultivars adaptable to site-specific condi-
ful tool for meeting development and sustainability goals tions; improving access to resources; improving soil, water
resides in empowering farmers to innovatively manage soils, and nutrient management and conservation; pre- and post-
water, biological resources, pests, disease vectors, genetic di- harvest pest management; and increasing small-scale farm
versity, and conserve natural resources in a culturally appro- diversification. Policy options for addressing food security
priate manner. Combining farmers’ and external knowledge include developing high-value and underutilized crops in
would require new partnerships among farmers, scientists rain fed areas; increasing the full range of agricultural ex-
and other stakeholders. ports and imports, including organic and fair trade prod-
Policy options for improving livelihoods include access ucts; reducing transaction costs for small-scale producers;
to microcredit and other financial services; legal frameworks strengthening local markets; food safety nets; promoting
that ensure access and tenure to resources and land; re- agro-insurance; and improving food safety and quality. Price
course to fair conflict resolution; and progressive evolution shocks and extreme weather events call for a global system
and proactive engagement in intellectual property rights of monitoring and intervention for the timely prediction of
(IPR) regimes and related instruments.2 Developments are major food shortages and price-induced hunger.
needed that build trust and that value farmer knowledge, AKST investments can increase the sustainable produc-
agricultural and natural biodiversity; farmer-managed me- tivity of major subsistence foods including orphan and un-
dicinal plants, local seed systems and common pool resource derutilized crops, which are often grown or consumed by
management regimes. Each of these options, when imple- poor people. Investments could also be targeted for institu-
mented locally, depends on regional and nationally based- tional change and policies that can improve access of poor
mechanisms to ensure accountability. The suite of options people to food, land, water, seeds, germplasm and improved
to increase domestic farm gate prices for small-scale farmers technologies.
includes fiscal and competition policies; improved access to
AKST; novel business approaches; and enhanced political Environmental sustainability
power. AKST systems are needed that enhance sustainability while
maintaining productivity in ways that protect the natural
resource base and ecological provisioning of agricultural
systems. Options include improving nutrient, energy, wa-
1
Botswana. ter and land use efficiency; improving the understanding of
2
USA. soil-plant-water dynamics; increasing farm diversification;
01-EXEC.indd 5 11/3/08 12:04:59 PM
17. 6 | Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report
supporting agroecological systems, and enhancing biodiver- • Increasing food safety can be facilitated by effective,
sity conservation and use at both field and landscape scales; coordinated, and proactive national and international
promoting the sustainable management of livestock, forest food safety systems to ensure animal, plant, and human
and fisheries; improving understanding of the agroecologi- health, such as investments in adequate infrastructure,
cal functioning of mosaics of crop production areas and public health and veterinary capacity, legislative frame-
natural habitats; countering the effects of agriculture on cli- works for identification and control of biological and
mate change and mitigating the negative impacts of climate chemical hazards, and farmer-scientist partnerships for
change on agriculture. the identification, monitoring and evaluation of risks.
Policy options include ending subsidies that encourage • The burden of infectious disease can be decreased by
unsustainable practices and using market and other mecha- strengthening coordination between and the capacity of
nisms to regulate and generate rewards for agro/environ- agricultural, veterinary, and public health systems; inte-
mental services, for better natural resource management grating multi-sectoral policies and programs across the
and enhanced environmental quality. Examples include food chain to reduce the spread of infectious diseases;
incentives to promote integrated pest management (IPM) and developing and deploying new AKST to identify,
and environmentally resilient germplasm management, monitor, control, and treat diseases.
payments to farmers and local communities for ecosystem • The burden of chronic disease can be decreased by poli-
services, facilitating and providing incentives for alternative cies that explicitly recognize the importance of improv-
markets such as green products, certification for sustainable ing human health and nutrition, including regulation of
forest and fisheries practices and organic agriculture and the food product formulation through legislation, interna-
strengthening of local markets. Long-term land and water tional agreements and regulations for food labeling and
use rights/tenure, risk reduction measures (safety nets, credit, health claims, and creation of incentives for the produc-
insurance, etc.) and profitability of recommended technolo- tion and consumption of health-promoting foods.
gies are prerequisites for adoption of sustainable practices. • Occupational and public health can be improved by de-
Common pool resource regimes and modes of governance velopment and enforcement of health and safety regula-
that emphasize participatory and democratic approaches tions (including child labor laws and pesticide regula-
are needed. tions), enforcement of cross-border issues such as illegal
Investment opportunities in AKST that could improve use of toxic agrochemicals, and conducting health risk
sustainability and reduce negative environmental effects assessments that make explicit the tradeoffs between
include resource conservation technologies, improved tech- maximizing livelihood benefits, the environment, and
niques for organic and low-input systems; a wide range of improving health.
breeding techniques for temperature and pest tolerance; re-
search on the relationship of agricultural ecosystem services
and human well-being; economic and non-economic valua- Equity
tions of ecosystem services; increasing water use efficiency For AKST to contribute to greater equity, investments are re-
and reducing water pollution; biocontrols of current and quired for the development of context-specific technologies,
emerging pests and pathogens; biological substitutes for and expanded access of farmers and other rural people to oc-
agrochemicals; and reducing the dependency of the agricul- cupational, non-formal and formal education. An environ-
tural sector on fossil fuels. ment in which formal science and technology and local and
traditional knowledge are seen as part of an integral AKST
Human health and nutrition system can increase equitable access to technologies for a
Inter-linkages between health, nutrition, agriculture, and broad range of producers and natural resource managers.
AKST affect the ability of individuals, communities, and na- Incentives in science, universities and research organizations
tions to reach sustainability goals. These inter-linkages exist are needed to foster different kinds of AKST partnerships.
within the context of multiple stressors that affect popula- Key options include equitable access to and use of natural
tion health. A broad and integrated approach is needed to resources (particularly land and water), systems of incen-
identify appropriate use of AKST to increase food security tives and rewards for multifunctionality, including ecosys-
and safety, decrease the incidence and prevalence of a range tem services, and responding to the vulnerability of farming
of infectious (including emerging and reemerging diseases and farm worker communities. Reform of the governance
such as malaria, avian influenza, HIV/AIDS and others) and of AKST and related organizations is also important for
chronic diseases, and decrease occupational exposures, in- the crucial role they can play in improving community-level
juries and deaths. Robust agricultural, public health, and scientific literacy, decentralization of technological oppor-
veterinary detection, surveillance, monitoring, and response tunities, and the integration of farmer concerns in research
systems can help identify the true burden of ill health and priority setting and the design of farmer services. Improving
cost-effective, health-promoting strategies and measures. equity requires synergy among various development actors,
Additional investments are needed to maintain and improve including farmers, rural laborers, banks, civil society organi-
current systems and regulations. zations, commercial companies, and public agencies. Stake-
• Increasing food security can be facilitated by promot- holder involvement is also crucial in decisions about IPR,
ing policies and programs to diversify diets and improve infrastructure, tariffs, and the internalization of social and
micronutrient intake; and developing and deploying ex- environmental costs. New modes of governance to develop
isting and new technologies for the production, process- innovative local networks and decentralized government,
ing, preservation, and distribution of food. focusing on small-scale producers and the urban poor (ur-
01-EXEC.indd 6 11/3/08 12:04:59 PM
18. Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report | 7
ban agriculture; direct links between urban consumers and health, natural resource management, trade and markets,
rural producers) will help create and strengthen synergistic traditional and local knowledge and community-based in-
and complementary capacities. novation and women in agriculture.
Preferential investments in equitable development (e.g.,
literacy, education and training) that contribute to reduc- Bioenergy
ing ethnic, gender, and other inequities would advance de- Rising costs of fossil fuels, energy security concerns, in-
velopment goals. Measurements of returns to investments creased awareness of climate change and potentially positive
require indices that give more information than GDP, and effects for economic development have led to considerable
that are sensitive to environmental and equity gains. The use public attention to bioenergy. Bioenergy includes traditional
of inequality indices for screening AKST investments and bioenergy, biomass to produce electricity, light and heat and
monitoring outcomes strengthens accountability. The Gini- first and next generation liquid biofuels. The economics and
coefficient could, for example, become a public criterion the positive and negative social and environmental exter-
for policy assessment, in addition to the more conventional nalities differ widely, depending on source of biomass, type
measures of growth, inflation and environment. of conversion technology and local circumstances.
Primarily due to a lack of affordable alternatives, mil-
Investments lions of people in developing countries depend on traditional
Achieving development and sustainability goals would en- bioenergy (e.g., wood fuels) for their cooking and heating
tail increased funds and more diverse funding mechanisms needs, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.
for agricultural research and development and associated This reliance on traditional bioenergy can pose consider-
knowledge systems, such as: able environmental, health, economic and social challenges.
• Public investments in global, regional, national and New efforts are needed to improve traditional bioenergy
local public goods; food security and safety, climate and accelerate the transition to more sustainable forms of
change and sustainability. More efficient use of increas- energy.
ingly scarce land, water and biological resources re- First generation biofuels consist predominantly of bio-
quires investment in research and development of legal ethanol and biodiesel produced from agricultural crops
and management capabilities. (e.g., maize, sugar cane). Production has been growing fast
• Public investments in agricultural knowledge systems to in recent years, primarily due to biofuel support policies
promote interactive knowledge networks (farmers, sci- since they are cost competitive only under particularly fa-
entists, industry and actors in other knowledge areas); vorable circumstances. The diversion of agricultural crops
improved access to information and communication to fuel can raise food prices and reduce our ability to allevi-
technologies (ICT); ecological, evolutionary, food, nu- ate hunger throughout the world. The negative social effects
trition, social and complex systems’ sciences; effective risk being exacerbated in cases where small-scale farmers
interdisciplinarity; capacity in core agricultural scienc- are marginalized or displaced from their land. From an en-
es; and improving life-long learning opportunities along vironmental perspective, there is considerable variation, un- “green
the food system. certainty and debate over the net energy balance and level of (GHG
• Public-private partnerships for improved commerciali- GHG emissions. In the long term, effects on food prices may file
zation of applied knowledge and technologies and joint be reduced, but environmental effects caused by land and
funding of AKST, where market risks are high and water requirements of large-scale increases of first genera-
where options for widespread utilization of knowledge tion biofuels production are likely to persist and will need
exist. to be addressed.
• Adequate incentives and rewards to encourage private Next generation biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol and
and civil society investments in AKST contributing to biomass-to-liquids technologies allow conversion into bio-
development and sustainability goals. fuels of more abundant and cheaper feedstocks than first
• In many developing countries, it may be necessary to generation. This could potentially reduce agricultural land
complement these investments with increased and more requirements per unit of energy produced and improve life-
targeted investments in rural infrastructure, education cycle GHG emissions, potentially mitigating the environ-
and health. mental pressures from first generation biofuels. However,
next generation biofuels technologies are not yet commer-
In the face of new global challenges, there is an urgent need cially proven and environmental and social effects are still
to strengthen, restructure and possibly establish new in- uncertain. For example, the use of feedstock and farm resi-
tergovernmental, independent science and evidence-based dues can compete with the need to maintain organic matter
networks to address such issues as climate forecasting for in sustainable agroecosystems.
agricultural production; human health risks from emerg- Bioelectricity and bioheat are important forms of renew-
ing diseases; reorganization of livelihoods in response to able energy that are usually more efficient and produce less
changes in agricultural systems (population movements); GHG emissions than liquid biofuels and fossil fuels. Digest-
food security; and global forestry resources. ers, gasifiers and direct combustion devices can be success-
fully employed in certain settings, e.g., off-grid areas. There
Themes is potential for expanding these applications but AKST is
The Synthesis Report looked at eight AKST-related themes needed to reduce costs and improve operational reliability.
of critical interest to meeting development and sustainabil- For all forms of bioenergy, decision makers should carefully
ity goals: bioenergy, biotechnology, climate change, human weigh full social, environmental and economic costs against
01-EXEC.indd 7 11/3/08 12:05:00 PM
19. 8 | Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report
realistically achievable benefits and other sustainable energy potentially undermining local practices that enhance food
options. security and economic sustainability. In this regard, there is
particular concern about present IPR instruments eventually
Biotechnology3 4
inhibiting seed-saving, exchange, sale and access to propri-
The IAASTD definition of biotechnology is based on that etary materials necessary for the independent research com-
in the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Carta- munity to conduct analyses and long term experimentation
gena Protocol on Biosafety. It is a broad term embracing the on impacts. Farmers face new liabilities: GM farmers may
manipulation of living organisms and spans the large range become liable for adventitious presence if it causes loss of
of activities from conventional techniques for fermentation market certification and income to neighboring organic
and plant and animal breeding to recent innovations in tissue farmers, and conventional farmers may become liable to GM
culture, irradiation, genomics and marker-assisted breeding seed producers if transgenes are detected in their crops.
(MAB) or marker assisted selection (MAS) to augment natu- A problem-oriented approach to biotechnology research
ral breeding. Some of the latest biotechnologies (“modern and development (R&D) would focus investment on local
biotechnology”) include the use of in vitro modified DNA priorities identified through participatory and transparent
or RNA and the fusion of cells from different taxonomic processes, and favor multifunctional solutions to local
families, techniques that overcome natural physiological re- problems. These processes require new kinds of support for
productive or recombination barriers. Currently the most the public to critically engage in assessments of the techni-
contentious issue is the use of recombinant DNA techniques cal, social, political, cultural, gender, legal, environmental
to produce transgenes that are inserted into genomes. Even and economic impacts of modern biotechnology. Biotech-
newer techniques of modern biotechnology manipulate her- nologies should be used to maintain local expertise and
itable material without changing DNA. germplasm so that the capacity for further research resides
Biotechnology has always been on the cutting edge within the local community. Such R&D would put much
of change. Change is rapid, the domains involved are nu- needed emphasis onto participatory breeding projects and
merous, and there is a significant lack of transparent com- agroecology.
munication among actors. Hence assessment of modern
biotechnology is lagging behind development; information Climate change
can be anecdotal and contradictory, and uncertainty on ben- Climate change, which is taking place at a time of increasing
efits and harms is unavoidable. There is a wide range of per- demand for food, feed, fiber and fuel, has the potential to
spectives on the environmental, human health and economic irreversibly damage the natural resource base on which ag-
risks and benefits of modern biotechnology; many of these riculture depends. The relationship between climate change
risks are as yet unknown. and agriculture is a two-way street; agriculture contributes
Conventional biotechnologies, such as breeding tech- to climate change in several major ways and climate change
niques, tissue culture, cultivation practices and fermenta- in general adversely affects agriculture.
tion are readily accepted and used. Between 1950 and 1980, In mid- to high-latitude regions moderate local increases
prior to the development of genetically modified organisms in temperature can have small beneficial impacts on crop
(GMOs), modern varieties of wheat increased yields up to yields; in low-latitude regions, such moderate temperature
33% even in the absence of fertilizer. Modern biotechnolo- increases are likely to have negative yield effects. Some nega-
gies used in containment have been widely adopted; e.g., the tive impacts are already visible in many parts of the world;
industrial enzyme market reached US$1.5 billion in 2000. additional warming will have increasingly negative im-
The application of modern biotechnology outside contain- pacts in all regions. Water scarcity and the timing of water
ment, such as the use of genetically modified (GM) crops is availability will increasingly constrain production. Climate
much more contentious. For example, data based on some change will require a new look at water storage to cope with
years and some GM crops indicate highly variable 10-33% the impacts of more and extreme precipitation, higher intra-
yield gains in some places and yield declines in others. and inter-seasonal variations, and increased rates of evapo-
Higher level drivers of biotechnology R&D, such as transpiration in all types of ecosystems. Extreme climate
IPR frameworks, determine what products become avail- events (floods and droughts) are increasing and expected to
able. While this attracts investment in agriculture, it can amplify in frequency and severity and there are likely to be
also concentrate ownership of agricultural resources. An significant consequences in all regions for food and forestry
emphasis on modern biotechnology without ensuring ad- production and food insecurity. There is a serious potential
equate support for other agricultural research can alter for future conflicts over habitable land and natural resources
education and training programs and reduce the number such as freshwater. Climate change is affecting the distribu-
of professionals in other core agricultural sciences. This tion of plants, invasive species, pests and disease vectors and
situation can be self-reinforcing since today’s students de- the geographic range and incidence of many human, animal
fine tomorrow’s educational and training opportunities. and plant diseases is likely to increase.
The use of patents for transgenes introduces additional A comprehensive approach with an equitable regulatory
issues. In developing countries especially, instruments such framework, differentiated responsibilities and intermediate
as patents may drive up costs, restrict experimentation targets are required to reduce GHG emissions. The earlier
by the individual farmer or public researcher while also and stronger the cuts in emissions, the quicker concentra-
tions will approach stabilization. Emission reduction mea-
sures clearly are essential because they can have an impact
4
China and USA.
01-EXEC.indd 8 11/3/08 12:05:00 PM
20. Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report | 9
due to inertia in the climate system. However, since further and growing consumer awareness increase the need for
changes in the climate are inevitable adaptation is also im- effective, coordinated, and proactive national food safety
perative. Actions directed at addressing climate change and systems. Health concerns that could be addressed by AKST
promoting sustainable development share some important include the presence of pesticide residues, heavy metals, hor-
goals such as equitable access to resources and appropriate mones, antibiotics and various additives in the food system
technologies. as well as those related to large-scale livestock farming.
Some “win-win” mitigation opportunities have already Strengthened food safety measures are important and
been identified. These include land use approaches such as necessary in both domestic and export markets and can im-
lower rates of agricultural expansion into natural habitats; pose significant costs. Some countries may need help in meet-
afforestation, reforestation, increased efforts to avoid defor- ing food control costs such as monitoring and inspection,
estation, agroforestry, agroecological systems, and restora- and costs associated with market rejection of contaminated
tion of underutilized or degraded lands and rangelands and commodities. Taking a broad and integrated agroecosystem
land use options such as carbon sequestration in agricultural and human health approach can facilitate identification of
soils, reduction and more efficient use of nitrogenous inputs; animal, plant, and human health risks, and appropriate
effective manure management and use of feed that increases AKST responses.
livestock digestive efficiency. Policy options related to regu- Worldwide, agriculture accounts for at least 170,000
lations and investment opportunities include financial incen- occupational deaths each year: half of all fatal accidents.
tives to maintain and increase forest area through reduced Machinery and equipment, such as tractors and harvesters,
deforestation and degradation and improved management account for the highest rates of injury and death, particu-
and the development and utilization of renewable energy larly among rural laborers. Other important health hazards
sources. The post-2012 regime has to be more inclusive of include agrochemical poisoning, transmissible animal dis-
all agricultural activities such as reduced emission from de- eases, toxic or allergenic agents, and noise, vibration and
forestation and soil degradation to take full advantage of the ergonomic hazards. Improving occupational health requires
opportunities offered by agriculture and forestry sectors. a greater emphasis on health protection through develop-
ment and enforcement of health and safety regulations. Poli-
Human health cies should explicitly address tradeoffs between livelihood
Despite the evident and complex links between health, nu- benefits and environmental, occupational and public health
trition, agriculture, and AKST, improving human health is risks.
not generally an explicit goal of agricultural policy. Agricul- The incidence and geographic range of many emerging
ture and AKST can affect a range of health issues including and reemerging infectious diseases are influenced by the in-
undernutrition, chronic diseases, infectious diseases, food tensification of crop and livestock systems. Serious socioeco-
safety, and environmental and occupational health. Ill heath nomic impacts can arise when diseases spread widely within
in the farming community can in turn reduce agricultural human or animal populations, or when they spill over from
productivity and the ability to develop and deploy appropri- animal reservoirs to human hosts. Most of the factors that
ate AKST. Ill health can result from undernutrition, as well contribute to disease emergence will continue, if not inten-
as over-nutrition. Despite increased global food production sify. Integrating policies and programs across the food chain
over recent decades, undernutrition is still a major global can help reduce the spread of infectious diseases; robust
public health problem, causing over 15% of the global dis- detection, surveillance, monitoring, and response programs
ease burden. Protein energy and micronutrient malnutrition are critical.
remain challenges, with high variability between and within
countries. Food security can be improved through policies Natural resource management4 5
and programs to increase dietary diversity and through de- Natural resources, especially those of soil, water, plant and
velopment and deployment of existing and new technologies animal diversity, vegetation cover, renewable energy sources,
for production, processing, preservation, and distribution climate, and ecosystem services are fundamental for the
of food. structure and function of agricultural systems and for social
AKST policies and practices have increased production and environmental sustainability, in support of life on earth.
and new mechanisms for food processing. Reduced dietary Historically the path of global agricultural development has
quality and diversity and inexpensive foods with low nu- been narrowly focused on increased productivity rather than
trient density have been associated with increasing rates of on a more holistic integration of natural resource manage-
worldwide obesity and chronic disease. Poor diet through- ment (NRM) with food and nutritional security. A holistic,
out the life course is a major risk factor for chronic dis- or systems-oriented approach, is preferable because it can
eases, which are the leading cause of global deaths. There is address the difficult issues associated with the complexity
a need to focus on consumers and the importance of dietary of food and other production systems in different ecologies,
quality as main drivers of production, and not merely on locations and cultures.
quantity or price. Strategies include fiscal policies (taxation, AKST to resolve NRM exploitation issues, such as
trade regimes) for health-promoting foods and regulation the mitigation of soil fertility through synthetic inputs and
of food product formulation, labeling and commercial in- natural processes, is often available and well understood.
formation.
Globalization of the food supply, accompanied by con- 5
Capture fisheries and forestry have not been as well covered as
centration of food distribution and processing companies, other aspects of NRM.
01-EXEC.indd 9 11/3/08 12:05:00 PM
21. 10 | Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report
Nevertheless, the resolution of natural resource challenges among, and within, countries that in many cases have not
will demand new and creative approaches by stakeholders been favorable for small-scale farmers and rural livelihoods.
with diverse backgrounds, skills and priorities. Capabilities These distributional impacts call for differentiation in policy
for working together at multiple scales and across different frameworks and institutional arrangements if these coun-
social and physical environments are not well developed. tries are to benefit from agricultural trade. There is growing
For example, there have been few opportunities for two-way concern that opening national agricultural markets to in-
learning between farmers and researchers or policy makers. ternational competition before basic institutions and infra-
Consequently farmers and civil society members have sel- structure are in place can undermine the agricultural sector,
dom been involved in shaping NRM policy. Community- with long-term negative effects for poverty, food security
based partnerships with the private sector, now in their early and the environment.5 6
stages of development, represent a new and promising way Trade policy reform to provide a fairer global trading
forward. system can make a positive contribution to sustainability
The following high priority NRM options for action are and development goals. Special and differential treatment
proposed: accorded through trade negotiations can enhance the ability
• Use existing AKST to identify and address some of the of developing countries to pursue food security and devel-
underlying causes of declining productivity embedded opment goals while minimizing trade-related dislocations.
in natural resource mismanagement, and develop new Preserving national policy flexibility allows developing
AKST based on multidisciplinary approaches for a bet- countries to balance the needs of poor consumers (urban
ter understanding of the complexity in NRM. Part of and rural landless) and rural small-scale farmers. Increasing
this process will involve the cost-effective monitoring of the value captured by small-scale farmers in global, regional
trends in the utilization of natural resource capital. and local markets chains is fundamental to meeting devel-
• Strengthen human resources in the support of natural opment and sustainability goals. Supportive trade policies
capital through increased investment (research, training can also make new AKST available to the small-scale farm
and education, partnerships, policy) in promoting the sector and agroenterprises.
awareness of the societal costs of degradation and value Developing countries would benefit from the removal
of ecosystems services. of barriers for products in which they have a comparative
• Promote research “centers of AKST-NRM excellence” advantage; reduction of escalating tariffs for processed com-
to facilitate less exploitative NRM and better strategies modities in industrialized and developing countries; deeper
for resource resilience, protection and renewal through preferential access to markets for least developed countries;
innovative two-way learning processes in research and increased public investment in rural infrastructure and the
development, monitoring and policy formulation. generation of public goods AKST; and improved access to
• Create an enabling environment for building NRM ca- credit, AKST resources and markets for poor producers.
pacity and increasing understanding of NRM among Compensating revenues lost as a result of tariff reductions
stakeholders and their organizations in order to shape is essential to advancing development agendas.6 7
NRM policy in partnership with public and private sec- Agriculture generates large environmental externalities,
tors. many of which derive from failure of markets to value envi-
• Develop networks of AKST practitioners (farmer or- ronmental and social harm and provide incentives for sus-
ganizations, NGOs, government, private sector) to fa- tainability. AKST has great potential to reverse this trend.
cilitate long-term natural resource management to en- Market and trade policies to facilitate the contribution of
hance benefits from natural resources for the collective AKST to reducing the environmental footprint of agricul-
good. ture include removing resource use–distorting subsidies;
• Connect globalization and localization pathways that taxing externalities; better definitions of property rights;
link locally generated NRM knowledge and innova- and developing rewards and markets for agroenvironmen-
tions to public and private AKST. tal services, including the extension of carbon financing, to
provide incentives for sustainable agriculture.
When AKST is developed and used creatively with active The quality and transparency of governance in the
participation among various stakeholders across multiple agricultural sector, including increased participation of
scales, the misuse of natural capital can be reversed and the stakeholders in AKST decision making is fundamental.
judicious use and renewal of water bodies, soils, biodiver- Strengthening developing country trade analysis and ne-
sity, ecosystems services, fossil fuels and atmospheric quality gotiation capacity, and providing better tools for assessing
ensured for future generations. tradeoffs in proposed trade agreements are important to im-
proving governance.
Trade and markets
Targeting market and trade policies to enhance the ability Traditional and local knowledge and community-
of agricultural and AKST systems to drive development, based innovation
strengthen food security, maximize environmental sustain- Once AKST is directed simultaneously toward production,
ability, and help make the small-scale farm sector profitable profitability, ecosystem services and food systems that are
to spearhead poverty reduction is an immediate challenge site-specific and evolving, then formal, traditional and lo-
around the world.
Agricultural trade can offer opportunities for the poor, 6
USA.
but current arrangements have major distributional impacts 7
Canada and USA.
01-EXEC.indd 10 11/3/08 12:05:01 PM
