Acting on the Future: Practical Foresight Implementation in Canada
1. Acting on the Future:
Practical Foresight
Implementation in Canada
John M Schmidt
CANSYNTH
July 27, 2015
WorldFuture 2015
Global Issues
2.
3. Most governments operate using institutions designed
for an era gone by.
Increasing collisions with “unforeseeable events” and
opportunities lost.
In chaotic circumstances, small actions can powerfully
influence ultimate outcomes.
We cannot rely indefinitely on crisis management, no
matter how adroit. We need to get ahead of events.
Anticipatory Governance:
4. Need to institutionalize three basic
management systems:
(1) a system for integrating foresight into
policy development and execution;
(2) a networked system;
(3) a feedback system.
Requirements:
5. Governments and their agencies need a
foresight function to help them:
• understand and challenge their own assumptions;
• anticipate plausible futures, including the expected
and unexpected outcomes of current decisions;
• observe key indicators;
• offset negative drivers or ameliorate their effects;
6. Governments and their agencies need a
foresight function to help them:
• be sensitive to weak signals and the emergence of
disruptive wild cards, as well as to more established
“trends”;
• pre-decide contingent strategies;
• respond quickly and adapt to change processes and
events;
• fulfill their mandates and meet their goals.
7. Not an easy sell, even if broad agreement on need.
Near-term emergencies always trump longer-term
challenges.
The question is how to achieve strategic coherence.
Government systems are outmoded for today’s kind
of problems, which are “complex” rather than just
“complicated.”
Anticipatory Governance:
8.
9. Outcomes:
• Intended
• Unintended
Foresight
Intelligence
• Emerging trends
• Scenarios/what-ifs
• Weak signals
• Outliers, Black swans
• Resiliency factors
• Drivers & Signposts
• Current/Operational
• Tactical forecast
• Strategic forecast
• Current trends
• Statistical predictions
• Monitoring/Warning
Planning
& Policy
Decisions
Actions
Near Far
Range of interest
Requirements
& Tasking
A Complete and Interactive System
10. • intelligence directed at supporting action (or
counter-action)
• foresight directed at supporting preparedness
and resiliency
• collaboration and mutual support between
the two
A Complete and Interactive System:
11. Government agency executives are often:
• uncertain how to effectively develop and
implement a foresight capacity;
• hesitant without having a clear idea of the
likely cost-benefit consequences.
17. • Some United Nations agencies
• European Union, OECD, NATO
• Other bilateral and multilateral international
bodies
• Some national governments
• Some specific government agencies
Public Sector Foresight Implementation:
18. Dreyer & Stang (2013)
Country
Foresight
program(s)
implemented
Well resourced
& widely used
Multiple
departments
Central agency
Arms-length
research agency
Canada X X X X
France X X X X
Netherlands X X X X
Singapore X X X X
UK X X X X
Finland X X X X
Sweden X X X X
Germany X X X
U.S. X X X
Japan X X X X
South Korea X X X
Australia X X
China X ? X? ? ?
Norway X X
Brazil X
Switzerland X
Italy X
South Africa X
Russia X
India
Indonesia
Mexico
Government implementation of foresight
19. • Centralised – foresight responsibility vested in one
or a few central, whole-of government agencies or
external authorities
• Decentralized – foresight responsibility vested in
line departments and agencies
• Distributed – both central agency and line agency
responsibilities, non-hierarchical and networked
Implementation Approaches:
21. • Foresight program formally established in 1994
• Science & innovation investment framework report of
2004
– All departments to do horizon scanning and be linked
– Office of S&T Horizon Scanning Centre
– Chief Scientific Adviser to provide strategic context
• In 2009, the foresight program was determined to be
effective and broadened beyond S&T policy to the
full public policy agenda
United Kingdom
22. United Kingdom
• More recently, has become badly coordinated
• Central oversight now absent
• Interdepartmental analyst-level networks poorly
coordinated and maintained
• Horizon scanning performance inconsistent and not
generally systematic
• Foresight networks not centrally managed
• Civil service siloing affected foresight activities and
outcomes
23. • As of 2012, few departments and agencies had
foresight functions
• Now, at least fifty use foresight in some form
• Some are well-established, programmatic units
• Others are rapidly developing foresight capabilities
• In some, though, foresight activities have declined
• There is still no central foresight agency with whole-
of-government foresight responsibility
United States
24. United States
Federal Foresight Community of Interest
• Informal, but well-established network
• Sharing foresight methods, best practices and results
• Community document repository (on Max.gov)
• Peer analysis, expertise and resources
• Fostering cross-agency research and collaboration
• Partnering with non-government organizations
• Demonstrating the value of foresight in government
• Promoting connectivity and leadership engagement
25. • growing interest in foresight
• scanning most developed; scenario use increasing
• some department head committees supportive
• Policy Horizons Canada the central foresight agency
• most departments in Environmental Scanning Practice
Group
• few groups with mandate to do foresight, but changing
• nine government departments identified as doing
foresight
Canada in 2012
27. Policy Horizons Canada (Horizons):
• evolved in 2011
• provides foresight to help the federal public
service anticipate emerging policy challenges
and opportunities in a rapidly changing and
complex world
• works with others, inside and outside the
federal family
Canada Now
28. Policy Horizons Canada (Horizons):
• reports to a Committee of Deputy Ministers.
(department heads)
• 16 professional and 10 administrative staff
• produces one or two major and contributing
reports per year
Canada Now
29.
30. October, 2012
Driving Policy on a Shifting Terrain: Understanding the Changing Policy Environment
Amid 21st-Century Complexity
Innovation Labs: Bridging Think Tanks and Do Tanks
The Emerging Neurotechnologies: Recent Developments and Policy Implications
The Next Economy: Transformation and Resilience in Times of Rapid Change
December, 2012
Transforming Off-line Commitment to Online Engagement: Year one in Creating a
Community of Practice on a Social Media Platform
Observing the Big Blue Marble: A Policy Lever
Manufacturing Goes Digital with 3D Printing
June, 2013
Viral Change in Organizations
The Future is History
Benefits and Challenges of ICTs for Citizens
Sharing Ideas with Visuals
Technology: Governing the Ungovernable?
August, 2013
Agricultural and Natural Manufacturing Technology
Building Familiarity with Federal Foresight Approaches and Tools in the Yukon
Neurotechnology and Cognitive Technologies
Nanotechnology and Materials Science
The Rise of the Otherwise-abled
Health Technology
Digital and Communication Technology
31.
32.
33. Canada
Departments and agencies
• Approximately 215 officially listed
• 10 to 15 known to have active foresight programs
• No foresight network in place
• Information gaps likely
• CALWC, in cooperation with Horizons and the
Conference Board of Canada, recently conducted an
inventory exercise
34. Canada
Foresight Inventory
• Existence and formality of foresight function
• Unit size and proportion of foresight work
• Location in the organization
• Links to wider structure and governance processes
• Maturity
• Participation and acceptance
• Training
• Products, success stories and lessons learned
35. Canada
Foresight Inventory
• Well over 100 questionnaires sent out to people in
key positions in departments and agencies most
likely to have foresight activities
• Horizons and ten departments and agencies
provided completed questionnaires
• Not all agencies with previously known foresight
functions replied, but some new ones did
36. Canada
Foresight Inventory Results
• Four types:
1. Formal foresight function/unit
2. Foresight as non-primary responsibility of
other staff
3. Foresight projects/activities done
4. No identified foresight activity
38. Canada
No network!
• CBoC FuSION brings people from across the
government together for foresight training
and exercises, but is generally limited to that
• No shared place/mechanism to develop,
exchange and store knowledge and results
• Agency foresight efforts can sprout, wither
and disappear without outside awareness or
support
39. Canada
Conclusion:
Canada is a long way from having a sound
foresight regime. While it has an established
central foresight agency, its focus is almost
entirely on whole-of-government issues.
Agency-based implementations are few,
mostly still quite tentative and generally
isolated from one another, especially without
a network to support effective collaboration.
40. Thinking about the Future, Guidelines for Strategic Foresight, Andy Hines and Peter
Bishop, Eds., http://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Future-Guidelines-Strategic-
Foresight/dp/097893170X
Anticipatory Governance – Practical Upgrades, Leon Fuerth and Evan Faber,
http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja
&sqi=2&ved=0CCkQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wilsoncenter.org%2Fsites%2Fdefa
ult%2Ffiles%2FAnticipatory_Governance_Practical_Upgrades.pdf&ei=qkR5UqzwNLOM
yAHd0IGYCA&usg=AFQjCNE3uMEeJPjcKN-TqHEiy2VzvQRf_w
"Co-Creating Foresight Culture in Government", Greg Van Alstyne,
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ec4lenpkpxqribc/VanAlstyne%2CG_2013_CoCreatingFore
sightCultureinGovt_sLab-OCADU.pdf
UH Foresight Bibliography, University of Houston group,
http://www.andyhinesight.com/?attachment_id=1446 (click on the UH Foresight
Bibliography link, updated regularly, or on one of the floating words/phrases )
The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World, Peter
Schwartz, http://www.amazon.com/The-Art-Long-View-Uncertain/dp/0385267320/
ref=pd_sim_b_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=0X54JFZ85TCY72B5PEYM#reader_0385267320
41. Foresight in governments – practices and trends around the world, Iana Dreyer and
Gerald Stang,
http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0C
C4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.iss.europa.eu%2Ffileadmin%2Feuiss%2Fdocumen
ts%2FBooks%2FYearbook%2F2.1_Foresight_in_governments.pdf&ei=bKbBUtbGKI2tkAf
X8oCwDQ&usg=AFQjCNEwRvI5ub_YptwsbkdpEZiuX3ZQvw&bvm=bv.58187178,d.cWc
Foresight for Government, David M. Walker, http://www.wfs.org/futurist/foresight-
for-government
Creating Strategic Foresight in Government, John M. Kamensky,
http://www.businessofgovernment.org/blog/business-government/creating-strategic-
foresight-government
Scenario Planning Handbook: Developing Strategies in Uncertain Times, Ian Wilson
and Bill Ralston, http://www.amazon.com/Scenario-Planning-Handbook-Developing-
Strategies/dp/0324312857/ref=pd_sim_b_2
Scenario Planning in Organizations – How to create, use and assess scenarios, Thomas
J Chermack, http://www.amazon.com/Scenario-Planning-Organizations-Berrett-
Koehler-Organizational/dp/1605094137
42. Davos 2013: Resilience as a 21st Century Imperative, Arianna Huffington,
http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20130122234855-143695135-davos-
2013-resilience-as-a-21st-century-imperative?trk=vsrp_influencer_content_res_name
&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A1254205651390819108605%2CVSRPtargetId%3A10890%2
CVSRPcmpt%3Aprimary&_mSplash=1
Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds, U.S. National Intelligence Council,
http://www.dni.gov/index.php/about/organization/national-intelligence-council-
global-trends
Practicing Strategic Foresight in Government – the cases of Finland, Singapore and
the European Union (monograph), Tuomo Kuosa, S. Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, 2011, http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/monographs/Monograph19.pdf
MetaScan 2: Building Resilience in the Transition to a Digital Economy and a
Networked Society, Policy Horizons Canada, http://www.horizons.gc.ca/eng/content/
building-resilience-transition-digital-economy-and-networked-society
MetaScan 3: Emerging technologies, Policy Horizons Canada,
http://www.horizons.gc.ca/eng/content/metascan-3-emerging-technologies-0
43. Intelligence, Strategic Warning and Foresight: Completing the Package for Decision-
Makers, John M. Schmidt, IALEIA Journal of Intelligence Analysis, 22-2, April 2015
Special Edition: Intelligence Canaries: Applications in Strategic Early Warning – Towards
a New Intelligence Analysis Paradigm, http://www.ialeia.org/images/Journal/
JIA%2022-2%20Abstracts.pdf
Policy, Planning, Intelligence and Foresight in Government Organizations, John M.
Schmidt, Foresight (Emerald), 17-5, August 2015 (in print)