Michael Arcinas: Feed Purchase Management: Challenges following the significa...
VIV Asia 2013: Immunoglobilins in piglet nutrition, CropTech-FeedTech Conference, co-organized by WATT
1. Immunoglobulins in Piglet Nutrition
VIV 2013 Bangkok
Thursday – 14 March
15:00-16:00 h
CropTech-FeedTech Asia 2013 Conference, by WATT
1
2. Immunoglobulins in Piglet Nutrition
Presentation by
Thomas Heile, Dipl.-Ing. agr.
Product & Trial Manager, EW Nutrition
www.ew-nutrition.com
Hall 106 Booth C 020
2
3. Who we are…
EW Nutrition is a young company with:
Functional & Innovative Products Offering Added
Value
Solutions Backed by Scientific Research
Natural Solutions
Basic Production
3
7. Background
• Immunoglobulins have been part of young piglets
nutrition for almost 20 years.
• Natural sources of ingredients to enhance immunity
are needed world wide
7
8. Background
• Immunology is extremely difficult!
So, it’s best left to the experts...
• Immunology is extremely important!
So, we better at least understand the basics...
8
11. Basic Immunology…
The Immune system is like an army
• Many defense systems
• Many layers of protection
but,
the most advanced weapon are immunoglobulins
11
13. Basic Immunology…
IMMUNOGLOBULINS
• Natural compounds
• Globular proteins
• Found in all animals
• Last line of defense
• Antigen-specific design
• Extremely effective
• Costly for the organism
13
15. Birds
• Mammals have IgG
• Birds possess IgY (Y = “yolk”) IgG
Hinge
• IgY provide passive immunity to chicks
• IgY are heavier because they posses one
IgY
extra region IgY posses one extra region
• IgY has higher affinity (more binding sites)
• IgY has higher avidity (binds stronger)
15
17. Mode of action
Absence of IgY Presence of IgY
intestinal wall
sporozoids
Y
Y
bacteria IgY
Y
Y
virus
Y
membrane receptor
Y
17
18. Two fold mode of action
• Ig binds bacteria and viruses in the gut
• Ig occupies binding sites on epithelium
Tagged pathogens are ‘cleared’ for extermination
Blocked pathogens cannot bind to epithelium
Blocked sites cannot host pathogens
Reduced pathogenic load = increased gut health
18
19. Sources of Immunoglobulins
• Sow colostrum and milk (suckling pigs)
• Spray-dried bovine colostrum and whey
• Spray-dried animal plasma
• Spray-dried hyper-immunized eggs
19
21. Best Meal in a Lifetime!
...nature’s best meal...
21
22. Sow colostrum
• Colostrum is rich in IgG
• IgG are absorbed intact only in the first hours
• Piglets deprived of colostrum often die
• Immunoglobulins in colostrum are hard to replace
in contrast to other nutrients!
22
27. Dried whey powder
• WPC and WPI are concentrated forms of Ig
• IgA is a more ‘generic’ form of Ig
• Not specific to piglet antigens
• Concentration varies considerably
• Quality varies considerably
• Results with WPC/WPI variable
• Pellets harden at high levels of WPC/WPI
27
30. Animal Plasma
• From pig and cattle slaughterhouses
• Spray-dried to preserve functional properties
• Off-cream color
• Characteristic aroma and metallic taste
• Free-flowing powder
• Expensive, at 3-4 euros per kg
• Added at approx. 5% in piglet diets
30
32. Animal Plasma
Effect most prominent
in the first couple of weeks post-weaning
in below-average health pigs and continuous-flow nurseries
in combination with low-quality diets
32
33. Issues with Animal Plasma
• Not allowed in many countries (due to BSE)
• Not used in many countries (due to BSE regulations that
require separate lines of feed production)
• Not preferred in many countries due to lack of confidence in
biosecurity
33
34. Mode of Action
• Taste and aroma? = No!
(Ermer et al. (1994) J.Anim.Sci. Vol. 72, pp.1548-1554
• Protein digestibility and quality? = No!
Other proteins with even better nutritive value don’t have similar effects...
• Glutamine concentration? = No!
Results of other studies with glutamine not so strong or repeatable..
34
35. Mode of Action of Animal Plasma
Casein Plasma Albumin Ig Rest
Weight gain
19a 134b 78ab 158c 50a
(g/day)
Feed intake
181a 262b 244ab 273b 191a
(g/day)
source: Gatnau & Zimmerman (1995)
Pigs were weaned at 19 days of age, and diets were fed for 15 days post-weaning.
35
36. Mode of Action of Animal Plasma
source: Owen et al (1995) J. Anim. Sci. Vol 73(1):81
Pigs were weaned at 21 days of age, and diets were fed for 2 weeks post-weaning.
36
37. Mode of Action of Animal Plasma
Pierce et al (2005) J. Anim. Sci. Vol 83:2876-2885
Pigs were weaned at 21 days of age, and diets were fed for 1 week post-weaning.
37
38. Mode of Action
It is clear that the mode of action of animal plasma is through
its immunoglobulin fraction.
Is it possible to replace immunoglobulin's from plasma?
38
40. Egg Immunoglobulins
• Natural component of all eggs
• Provide passive immunity to chicks
• Old farm-remedy for piglets with diarrhea...
Break a few eggs (from same farm) into piglet’s liquid
milk-based soup for a few days...or until diarrhea
disappears!
40
41. Egg Immunoglobulins
• Today, flocks are immunized against specific piglet
pathogens
• Eggs are collected and spray-dried
• Resulting egg powder is rich in IgY
Benefits: enhanced piglet health and growth
41
43. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
Passive immunization of IgY against K88-, K99-, and 987P-
fimbriae by experimental enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
infection in neonatal piglets
Infection and Immunity (1992, 60: 998-1007)
43
44. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
Animals: Neonatal pigs
Antibody: against K88, K99, and 987P fimbria of
enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)
Groups: 1. Control
2. IgY (1 titer, 4 titers, 16 titers)
Challenge: K88+ and K99+ ETEC; 1 x 1012 CFU / piglet
987P+ ETEC; 1 x 1010 CFU / piglet
Test period: 1 to 7 days of age
Observed: 1. Clinical symptoms
2. Bacteria detection
44
46. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
Incidence of diarrhea (%)
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 1 3 5
Days after challenge
Control (n=7) 1 (n=7) 4 (n=7) 16 (n=7)
46
47. Egg Immunoglobulins against TGE
Passive immunization of IgY against experimental
Transmissible Gastroenteritis of swine (TGE) in
neonatal piglets
Internal trial GHEN, 2000
47
48. Egg Immunoglobulins against TGE
Mortality Duration of Cumulative Weight gain
(%) diarrhea fecal score (%)
(days)
Control 80 12.4 70.0 -19.9
(n=5)
IGY 0* 5.2** 21.5** 7.7**
(n=6)
* p<0.05, ** P<0.01, compared with control group
48
49. Latest Research
• New studies focus on replacing plasma immunoglobulins
with egg immunoglobulins
• Advantages: Less expensive, more specific
• Results are promising!
49
50. IgY Replaces Plasma !
Control Plasma IgY
Weight gain (g/day) 100 138 134
Feed intake (g/day) 147 187 186
Days with diarrhea 7 4 3
Mortality 40 7 7
Pigs were weaned at 10 days of age, and diets were fed for 7 days post-weaning.
50
54. Comparison of available Ig sources
Sow colostrum Bovine Animal plasma Hyper
& milk colostrum & immunized eggs
dried whey
Swine specific
X - X XX
antibodies
Potential carrier
X - XX -
of disease
Cost low high high mid
Standardized
- X - XX
Ig Product
54
55. Immunoglobulins in Piglet Nutrition
• In-feed immunoglobulins are important!
• Piglet health and performance depend on Ig
• Sources vary in quality, concentration, potency
• Specific Ig have been shown to offer best results
55
56. Immunoglobulins in Piglet Nutrition
• When we buy piglet feed, we must ask about the source and
specificity of Ig of the feed, the same way we do about lysine,
lactose, and energy!
• When we formulate piglet feeds, we should think in terms of Ig,
not of plasma, milk, eggs, etc..
56
60. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
Passive immunization of IgY against F18-fimbriae by
experimental enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in
weaned pigs
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science (1997, 59: 917-921)
60
61. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
Animals: Weaned pigs
Antibody: against F18-fimbrial of Escherichia coli
Groups: Control
IgY (1 titer, 5 titers)
Challenge: F18+ ETEC; 1 x 1011 CFU / piglet
Test period: 28 to 36 days of age
Observed: 1. Clinical symptoms
2. Bacteria detection
3. Body weight
61
62. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
Incidence of diarrhea (%)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Days after challenge
Control (n=28) 1 (n=18) 5 (n=28)
62
63. Egg Immunoglobulins against ETEC
80 79,9**
70
60
Body weight gain (%)
52,4 52,1
50
40
30
20
10
0
Control (n= 28) Titer x1 (n=18) Titer x5 (n=28)
63