Peter Budd (University of Manchester) - Novel Membranes for Carbon Capture - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015
•
1 gefällt mir•1,489 views
Peter Budd (University of Manchester) - Novel Membranes for Carbon Capture - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Was ist angesagt?
Was ist angesagt? (20)
Ähnlich wie Peter Budd (University of Manchester) - Novel Membranes for Carbon Capture - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015
Ähnlich wie Peter Budd (University of Manchester) - Novel Membranes for Carbon Capture - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015 (20)
Mehr von UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre
Mehr von UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Peter Budd (University of Manchester) - Novel Membranes for Carbon Capture - UKCCSRC Cranfield Biannual 21-22 April 2015
- 1. Peter M. Budd Professor of Polymer Chemistry School of Chemistry University of Manchester Novel membranes for carbon capture CCS IN ACTION - CRANFIELD BIANNUAL 21-22 April 2015
- 2. Membrane processes Size/ nm 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 Particle filtration Microfiltration Ultrafiltration Nanofiltration Pervaporation Reverse osmosis Vapour permeation Gas separation Suspensions Emulsions Colloids Macromolecules Liquid mixtures Solutions Vapour/ gas mixtures Membrane process Example
- 3. Requirements Selectivity Productivity (permeability, flux) PERMEABILITYSELECTIVITY Membrane materials
- 4. Requirements Selectivity Productivity (permeability, flux) PERMEABILITY SELECTIVITY Membrane materials
- 5. Requirements Selectivity Productivity (permeability, flux) PERMEABILITY SELECTIVITY Membrane materials
- 7. Requirements Selectivity Productivity (permeability, flux) Processability Mechanical properties Chemical / thermal stability Long-term performance (resistance to ageing, fouling…) Trade-off Membrane materials
- 8. Post-combustion CO2 capture Low concentration 1015% CO2 in N2 Large volume 600 MW coal-fired power station produces 10,000 tonnes CO2 per day Low pressure
- 9. Post-combustion CO2 capture Low concentration 1015% CO2 in N2 Large volume 600 MW coal-fired power station produces 10,000 tonnes CO2 per day Low pressure Cannot get high purity and high recovery using a single-stage membrane process
- 10. MTR CO2 capture process
- 11. MTR CO2 capture process Pre-concentrated CO2, reduces membrane area and power
- 12. MTR CO2 capture process Air sweep, no compression or vacuum
- 13. Test system at National Carbon Capture Centre (NCCC)
- 14. High CO2 permeance is necessary to reduce cost
- 15. Polymers of Intrinsic Microporosity Flexible polymer chains can rearrange Rigid polymer chains pack together Rigid, contorted polymer chains cannot fill space
- 16. Polymers of Intrinsic Microporosity Molecular sieve
- 17. PIM-1 5,5’,6,6’-tetrahydroxy- 3,3,3’,3’-tetramethyl- 1,1’-spirobisindane tetrafluoro- terephthalonitrile K2CO3 dimethylformamide 65 ºC PIM-1 P.M. Budd et al., Chem. Commun., 2004, 230. Kadhum Msayib
- 18. Gas separation 1 10 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 O2/N2selectivity O2 permeability / Barrer Robeson 1991 Various polymers PDMS PTMSP Teflon AF2400 PIM-1 PIM-1 after MeOH P.M. Budd et al., J. Membr Sci., 2005, 252, 263; 2008, 325, 851.
- 19. Gas separation P.M. Budd et al., J. Membr Sci., 2005, 252, 263; 2008, 325, 851. 1 10 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 O2/N2selectivity O2 permeability / Barrer Robeson 2008 Robeson 1991 Various polymers PDMS PTMSP Teflon AF2400 PIM-1 PIM-1 after MeOH
- 20. Gas separation P.M. Budd et al., J. Membr Sci., 2005, 252, 263; 2008, 325, 851. 1 10 100 1000 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 CO2/N2selectivity CO2 permeability / Barrer Robeson 2008 Various polymers PDMS PTMSP Teflon AF2400 PIM-1
- 21. PIM-1 + Inorganic porous materials Metal- organic frameworks Organic cage molecules Organic polymer frameworks Carbons Silicalite C.R. Mason et al., Polymer, 2013, 54, 2222. Uni. Manchester Uni. Calabria ITM-CNR ICT Prague ZIF-8 A.F. Bushell et al., J. Membr. Sci., 2013, 427, 48. Uni. Manchester TIPS-RAS ITM-CNR ICT Prague Cage-3 A.F. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Edn., 2013, 52, 1253. Uni. Manchester Uni. Liverpool ITM-CNR PAF-1 C.H. Lau et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Edn., 2014, 53, 5322. CSIRO Uni. Colorado Monash Uni. Nanotubes M.M.Khan et al., J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 436, 109. HZG Mixed matrix membranes
- 22. PIM-1 / carbon nanotubes Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht M. Khan et al., Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2012, 7, 504. MWCNTs functionalised with PEG PIM-1 0.5 wt% f-MWCNTs 1 wt% f-MWCNTs 3 wt% f-MWCNTs 2 wt% f-MWCNTs
- 23. PIM-1 chains tend to align themselves parallel to graphene sheets. A. Gonciaruk et al., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 2015, 209, 126. PIM-1 / graphene
- 24. PIM-1 / cage CC3 CC3 windows ca. 0.6 nm T. Tozawa et al., Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 973. J.T.A. Jones et al., Nature, 2011, 474, 367.
- 25. PIM-1 / cage CC3 T. Tozawa et al., Nat. Mater., 2009, 8, 973. J.T.A. Jones et al., Nature, 2011, 474, 367. CC3 packs window to window in crystal structure, generating an interconnected pore network.
- 26. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. (1) In-situ crystallization of porous imine cage-3R (CC3) from molecular solution.
- 27. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. (1) In-situ crystallization of porous imine cage-3R (CC3) from molecular solution. (2) Dispersion of preformed racemic CC3 nanocrystals (nanoCC3).
- 28. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. (1) In-situ crystallization of porous imine cage-3R (CC3) from molecular solution. (2) Dispersion of preformed racemic CC3 nanocrystals (nanoCC3). (3) Reduced, non-porous amine form of CC3 (redCC3).
- 29. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. PIM-1/CC3 wt. ratio 10:2 wt. fraction 0.17 PIM-1/nanoCC3 PIM-1/redCC3
- 30. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. In-situ crystallization
- 31. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. In-situ crystallization 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 P/Barrer Weight fraction of cage CO2 N2 Ethanol-treated membranes
- 32. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. In-situ crystallization 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 P/Barrer Weight fraction of cage CO2 N2 Pre-formed nanocrystals Ethanol-treated membranes
- 33. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. In-situ crystallization Pre-formed nanocrystals 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 P/Barrer Weight fraction of cage CO2 N2 Reduced CC3, non-porous Ethanol-treated membranes
- 34. PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. Ageing 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 100 200 300 400 P(CO2)/Barrer Time / days PIM-1
- 35. 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 100 200 300 400 P(CO2)/Barrer Time / days PIM-1 Pre-formed nanocrystals PIM-1/CC3 10:2 10:1 PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. Ageing
- 36. 1,000 10,000 100,000 0 100 200 300 400 P(CO2)/Barrer Time / days PIM-1 In-situ crystallization PIM-1/CC3 10:3 10:2 10:1 PIM-1 / cage CC3 A. Bushell et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1253. Ageing
- 37. PIM-1 / PAF-1 C.H. Lau et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5322. CSIRO Division of Materials Science and Engineering; University of Colorado; Monash University; Australian National University “Ending aging” in super glassy polymer membranes
- 38. Acknowledgements Wayne Harrison Rupesh Bhavsar Bekir Satilmis Khalid Althumayri Muhanned Khdhayyer Bann Dawood Lei Gao Chris Mason Alexandra Bushell Louise Maynard-Atem Hosna Shamsipour Martin Attfield Flor Siperstein Aleksandra Gonkiaruk Annalaura del Regno Laura Leay Neil McKeown Kadhum Msayib Mariolino Carta Grazia Bezzu John Jansen Gabriele Clarizia Paola Bernardo Fabio Bazzarelli Elena Tocci Alberto Figoli Andrew Cooper Dave Adams James Jones Tom Hasell